noaa/nws ohio river forecast center hydrology 1913 to 2013. ohio state severe weather symposium

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yNOAA/NWS

Ohio River Forecast Center

Hydrology 1913 to 2013.Ohio State Severe Weather

Symposium

Jim NoelService Coordination Hydrologist

Robin Belton-GerhardtHydrologist

March 22, 2013

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yOutline

Hydrology of 1913 Duration of 1913 flood Magnitude of 1913 flood Big floods in the Ohio Valley 1913 in 20131913, 1997 and 2010 in 2013 Today’s Advances in Hydrology

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yHydrology of 1913

There was no snowpack prior to the event Soil conditions were wet leading into the event Streamflow conditions were not really elevated 1913 was an extreme event but also had a lot of

classic historic event characteristics Most of the intense rain fell in a few days Runoff rates were very high, close to 1, complete

runoff Rivers responded fast to the runoff Systems failed as Mother Nature exceeded the

capabilities of the system (both natural and man-made)

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yHydrology of 1913

River gages where 1913 flood of record still stands.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yDuration of Flooding from 1913

Flood happened fast in the faster responding upper Ohio River and Great Lakes basins.

LegendDays Above Flood Stage

1-33-10

10-2020-30

>30

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yMagnitude of Flooding from 1913

Minor flooding begins to appear in northern Ohio ahead of the main storm

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Flood expands across northern Indiana to northern Ohio and western Pennsylvania in faster responding areas.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Significant flooding occurring rapidly in faster responding tributaries

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Widespread major flooding is occurring across the northern Ohio Valley into the Lake Erie drainage areas

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Significant flooding subsiding in upstream tributaries but continues in downstream tributaries into Ohio River.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Flooding is shifting from the fast responding to slower responding rivers by March 28, 2013

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


Flooding now focused on lower Wabash, lower White basins of Indiana into Ohio River.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert


By April 1 the flood is now mainly in the Ohio River and heading downstream. It usually takes about a week for the water to move down the Ohio River.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yBig floods in the Ohio Valley Big floods are common in the Ohio Valley

Do these sound familiar: 1913, 1927, 1937, 1959, 1964, 1997, 2005, 2008, 2010, 2011 to name a few. Many more. Next one is 201?

Why? Crossroads of the jet stream. Ohio River Forecast Center is one of the busiest in the country,

usually in top three of 13 RFCs. Flooding occurs in most months of the year. Most big floods have a similar look! Most meteorologists and hydrologists focus on the 500 mb trough.

However, OHRFC research suggests the Southeast Ridge is even more important – like a ball hitting a wall!

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yBig floods in the Ohio Valley

1913 500 hPa

Composite2010 500 hPa

1997 500 hPa

ATL= 585 ATL= 585

ATL= 585 ATL= 582

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Youngstown, Ohio crest would be lower and faster with local water getting in faster. Also, Army Corps of Engineers holds water in their projects and release later for longer recession.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Zanesville, Ohio crest would be substantially lower as upstream projects of the Army Corps of Engineers and Muskingum Conservancy District hold water and release later for longer recession.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Columbus, Ohio crest would be similar or possibly slightly higher. However, due to levee failures (1913) and other complexities, confidence is low at this point.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Dayton, Ohio crest would be substantially lower as upstream projects of the Miami Conservancy District hold water and release later for longer recession. Flood Stage would not occur.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Fort Wayne, Indiana crest would be slightly higher and later with faster recession. This is likely a combination of urbanization and water getting into system faster.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Terre Haute, Indiana crest would be lower and faster with similar recession. Local water gets into system slightly faster. Much of the landscape remains agriculture over this time.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913 flood in 2013

Indianapolis, Indiana crest would be lower with double crest from local water, then upstream water arriving. Urbanization is responsible for initial crest. Recession is slower.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y1913, 1997 and 2010 flood in 2013

So, can we have worse floods in terms of rainfall than the 1913 flood?

Answer is YES! If so, what would some other recent floods, such

as the 1997 Kentucky flood and 2010 Nashville flood, look like today?

19138-10+ inches

19979-11+ inches

201010-15+ inches

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y

Columbus, Ohio – Convective extreme events such as the 2010 event in Nashville of up to 15+” of rain would cause extreme rises. Exact crests would be driven by how the system can maintain itself. Crests likely lower than shown here because things could fail.

1913, 1997 and 2010 flood in 2013

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

y

Dayton, Ohio – Flooding would be far less than in 1913 due to the impressive system built. 1913 today would be similar to 1997 today with 2010 being a more impressive system, but still well below 1913.

1913, 1997 and 2010 flood in 2013

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yToday’s Advances in Hydrology

Flood systems are in place, as in parts of the Miami and Muskingum systems.

Awareness is much better.Forecasting is now available with decent lead times. River modeling continues to improve.Ensemble and probabilistic forecasting are advancing. Flood mapping is expanding.Hydrology is in the rapid growth period much like

meteorology was in 1985.

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yToday’s Advances in Hydrology

River Ensemble Forecasting System

http://www.erh.noaa.gov/mmefs

Nati

onal

Wea

ther

Ser

vice

Pr

otec

ting

Live

s and

Pro

pert

yQuestions!

[email protected]

NOAA/NWS/OHRFC Service Coordination Hydrologist

THANKS!

mailto:[email protected]

noaa/nws ohio river forecast center hydrology 1913 to 2013. ohio state severe weather symposium

Documents