no slide titleengineering.richmondcc.edu/courses/eus 220/notes/doble power fac… · 4 august 22,...
TRANSCRIPT
PROPRIETARY INFORMATION
Doble Engineering Company (“Doble”), has full title, right and interest to allsubject matter contained in this presentation (“Proprietary Information”)regardless of the medium. You have been provided a copy of this ProprietaryInformation for private reference purposes only. Doble’s delivery to you ofDoble Proprietary Information does not constitute in any way whatsoever alicense of any kind or vests any interest in Doble’s Proprietary Information(other than private reference use), including, without limitation, the rights tocopy, disseminate, distribute, transmit, display or perform in public (or to thirdparties), reproduce, edit, translate or reformat. You, as recipient, acknowledgeand agree to these terms by your first viewing of this Proprietary Information.You further acknowledge and agree that Doble shall not have an adequateremedy at law in the event of your breach of the conditions hereunder, thatDoble will suffer irreparable damage and injury if you breach any of theconditions stated above, and that such breach occurs, Doble, in addition to anyother rights and remedies available herein or otherwise, shall be entitled toseek an injunction to be issued by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction restrictingthe recipient from committing or continuing any breach of these conditions.
Knowledge Is PowerSM
Apparatus Maintenance and Power Managementfor Energy Delivery
Power Factor Testing - Circuit Breakers
Gary HeustonDoble Engineering Company
August 22, 2004 Doble Training2
Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training3
Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training4
• Terminology
• Circuit breaker tests
• Power factor test
- applicable policies
- procedures
- analysis of results
- diagnostic tests
- case studies
▪ case 1: effect of connected bus
▪ case 2: SF6 breaker in satisfactory condition
▪ case 3: damaged contact assembly
Agenda
August 22, 2004 Doble Training5
▪ case 4: deteriorated grading capacitor dead tank SF6 breaker
▪ case 5: deteriorated bushing in vacuum breaker
▪ case 6: oil breaker not completely closed
▪ case 7: deteriorated air-magnetic breaker
▪ case 8: deteriorated grading capacitor
▪ case 9: contaminated SF6 gas in live tank breaker
Agenda
August 22, 2004 Doble Training6
• Dead tank switching device
Switching device in which a vessel(s) at ground potentialsurrounds and contains interrupter(s) and insulating medium.
• Live tank switching device
Switching device in which the vessel(s) housing theinterrupter(s) is at a potential above ground.
Source: IEEE Dictionary
Terminology
August 22, 2004 Doble Training7
Terminology
August 22, 2004 Doble Training8
1 2
Terminology
August 22, 2004 Doble Training9
42 61 3 5
Terminology
August 22, 2004 Doble Training10
Terminology
1 3 5
2 4 6
August 22, 2004 Doble Training11
Circuit Breaker Tests
Routinely includes these measurements:
• Power factor
- bushings
- circuit breaker
- insulating mineral oil
• Analysis of mechanical operation
• Contact resistance
sensitive to quality of contacts and connections
• Operational
• Infra-red
sensitive to hot-spots
August 22, 2004 Doble Training12
Circuit Breaker Tests
It may also include these measurements:
• Insulation resistance
sensitive to contamination and deterioration
• Insulating fluid
- mineral oil
▪ physical, chemical and electrical properties
▪ dissolved gases and metals
- SF6 gas
▪ moisture, purity, acidity and arc by-products
August 22, 2004 Doble Training13
Power Factor Test
Because of different vessel types and arrangements, differentoperating principles and internal construction, and differentinterrupting methods and mediums, circuit breakers are perhapsthe most complicated apparatus to test. Any procedure shouldstress all insulating components, to include:
• Entrance bushings
• Interrupter assemblies
• Insulated operating rods
• Any grading capacitors
Any procedure should also provide some assistance in locating anycontamination and deterioration.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training14
Applicable Test Policies
It is necessary to address specific aspects of this testing, toinclude:
• Averaging effect
- isolate from system
- perform searching series of tests to maximize sensitivity oftest to localized problems
• High external surface losses
- clean bushings
- perform Hot-Collar test
• High levels of electrostatic interference
in general, breakers are low capacitance specimens
August 22, 2004 Doble Training15
Averaging Effect
Perform searching series of tests to maximize sensitivity of test tolocalized conditions.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training16
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training17
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training18
Power Factor Test
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breaker Procedure 1
• Bushings
- Hot-Collar
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker tests
- 3 open-breaker USTs
Applies to all single-contact SF6 breakers.
Inherently low losses require bus disconnected.
All tests with breaker open.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training19
Power Factor Test
Nothing connected to remaining bushings.
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test ModePosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue2 Open 2 - - GST Ground Red Blue3 Open 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue4 Open 4 - - GST Ground Red Blue5 Open 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue6 Open 6 - - GST Ground Red Blue7 Open 1 2 - UST Measure Red Blue8 Open 3 4 - UST Measure Red Blue9 Open 5 6 - UST Measure Red Blue
Dead Tank SF6 Breaker, Procedure 1
August 22, 2004 Doble Training20
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Left-side bushing• Operating rod• Any left-side support
insulation• SF6 gas
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training21
Power Factor Test
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
Primarily stresses• Right-side bushing• Any right-side support
insulation• SF6 gas
August 22, 2004 Doble Training22
Power Factor Test
Open-Breaker UST Test, UST Mode
Measures• Contact assembly
August 22, 2004 Doble Training23
Case 1 - Effect of Connected Bus
Bus Connected Bus DisconnectedBushing I (mA) Watts % PF I (mA) Watts % PF1 0.690 0.020 0.29 0.520 0.006 0.122 0.520 0.180 3.46 0.350 0.005 0.143 0.680 0.020 0.29 0.520 0.006 0.144 0.500 0.038 0.76 0.350 0.004 0.115 0.690 0.120 1.74 0.520 0.006 0.126 0.520 0.070 1.34 0.350 0.004 0.111 to 2 0.009 0.004 0.007 0.0013 to 4 0.008 0.004 0.007 0.0015 to 6 0.008 0.006 0.007 0.001
ABB 72 – PM – 31 – 12
August 22, 2004 Doble Training24
Dead Tank SF6 with TRV Capacitors
August 22, 2004 Doble Training25
Dead Tank SF6 with TRV Capacitors
August 22, 2004 Doble Training26
Dead Tank SF6 with TRV Capacitors
August 22, 2004 Doble Training27
Power Factor Test
Dead Tank SF6 Breaker with TRV Capacitors, Procedure 1a
• Bushings
- Hot-Collar
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker tests
- 3 open-breaker USTs
- 3 TRV capacitor USTs
Applies to all single-contact SF6 breakers.
Inherently low losses require bus disconnected.
All tests with breaker open.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training28
Power Factor Test
Dead Tank SF6 Breaker with TRV Capacitors, Procedure 1a
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test Mode CommentPosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 Cap - GST Guard Red Blue1a Open 1 Cap - UST Measure Red Blue Capacitor2 Open 2 - - GST Ground Red Blue3 Open 3 Cap - GST Guard Red Blue3a Open 3 Cap - UST Measure Red Blue Capacitor4 Open 4 - - GST Ground Red Blue5 Open 5 Cap - GST Guard Red Blue5a Open 5 Cap - UST Measure Red Blue Capacitor6 Open 6 - - GST Ground Red Blue7 Open 1 Cap 2 UST Measure Blue Ground8 Open 3 Cap 4 UST Measure Blue Ground9 Open 5 Cap 6 UST Measure Blue Ground
Disconnect ground lead from base of each capacitor. This ground lead must beconnected before breaker is energized for service.
Nothing connected to remaining bushings.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training29
Power Factor Test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training30
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training31
Power Factor Test
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breaker, Procedure 2
• Bushings
- Hot-Collar
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker tests
- 3 open-breaker USTs
- 3 closed-breaker tests
Applies to most multi-contact SF6 circuit breakers.
Inherently low losses require bus disconnected.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training32
Power Factor Test
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test ModePosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue2 Open 2 - - GST Ground Red Blue3 Open 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue4 Open 4 - - GST Ground Red Blue5 Open 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue6 Open 6 - - GST Ground Red Blue7 Open 1 2 - UST Measure Red Blue8 Open 3 4 - UST Measure Red Blue9 Open 5 6 - UST Measure Red Blue10 Closed 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue11 Closed 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue12 Closed 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue
Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breaker, Procedure 2
August 22, 2004 Doble Training33
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Left-side bushing• Left-side support
insulation• SF6 gas
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training34
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Right-side bushing• Right-side support
insulation• SF6 gas
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training35
Power Factor Test
Measures• Grading capacitors• Contact assemblies
Open-Breaker UST Test, UST Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training36
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Bushings• Support insulation• Operating rod• SF6 gas
Applies 10 kV directly to operating rod and additional support insulation.
Closed-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training37
It is necessary to address specific aspects of the analysis of resultsand investigation of questionable results, to include:
• Temperature correction
Results for SF6 circuit breakers not corrected for temperaturevariation
• Very low capacitance specimen
- current is 300 µA (80 pF) or less: evaluate dielectric loss
test performed at several voltages: evaluate dielectric lossand its increase
- current is greater than 300 µA (80 pF): evaluate power factorand capacitance
test performed at several voltages: evaluate power factor atlowest test voltage, power factor tip-up and capacitance
Analysis Policies - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
August 22, 2004 Doble Training38
Analysis - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
Compare results:
• with factory data (acceptance test)
• with earlier tests (especially first acceptable test)
• among similar test specimens
- among similar tests
tests (1, 3 and 5) (2, 4 and 6) (7, 8 and 9) (10, 11 and 12)
- among phases
- among similar dead tank SF6 circuit breakers
• with Doble’s database and typical results (TDRB)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training39
Analysis - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
Tests 1 to 6
• Dominated by bushing
also includes operating rod, any support insulation and SF6 gas
• PF generally less than 1.0 %
Diagnostics
• High losses or high PF
degraded bushing, operating rod, support insulation, SF6 gas
- bushing Hot-Collar test
- test at several voltages (power factor tip-up)
- test SF6 gas for moisture content
- internal inspection
August 22, 2004 Doble Training40
Analysis - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
Tests 7, 8 and 9 (no grading capacitors)
• Condition of contact assembly (and SF6 gas)
• Very low current, evaluate losses
losses generally 0.010 Watts or less
Diagnostics
• High losses
degraded contact assembly
- test at several voltages (power factor tip-up)
- test SF6 gas for moisture content
- internal inspection
August 22, 2004 Doble Training41
Analysis - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
Tests 7, 8 and 9 (with grading capacitors)
• Dominated by grading capacitors
also includes contact assembly (and SF6 gas)
• PF generally less than 1.0 %
Diagnostic
• High PF
degraded capacitor, contact assembly
- test at several voltages (power factor tip-up)
- test individual capacitors
- inspect contact assembly
August 22, 2004 Doble Training42
Analysis - Dead Tank SF6 Breaker
Tests 10, 11 and 12 (most multi-contact breakers)
• Dominated by bushings
also includes operating rod, support insulation, SF6 gas
• PF is generally less than 1.0 %
Diagnostic
• High PF
degraded bushing, operating rod, support insulation, SF6 gas
- bushing Hot-Collar tests
- test at several voltages (power factor tip-up)
- test SF6 gas for moisture
- internal inspection
August 22, 2004 Doble Training43
Surface conditions can be determined by performing a single Hot-Collar test with GST Ground mode (GND RB). Collar is normallyplaced underneath first skirt from line terminal.
• If losses are 0.10 Watt or less
surface conditions are acceptable
• If losses are higher than 0.10 Watt
clean weathershed and repeat Hot-Collar test
if necessary, repeat cleaning process and Hot-Collar test
It may be necessary to clean weathershed repeatedly. In somecases it may be necessary to clean weathershed with abrasivematerial.
High External Surface Losses
August 22, 2004 Doble Training44
Case 2 - Breaker in Satisfactory Condition
Bkr Pos Test Ph Test 10 kV Equiv % PF corr CapkV I (mA) Watts meas corr factor (pF)
Open 1 1 10 0.518 0.005 0.10 0.10 1.00 138.752 1 10 0.444 0.005 0.11 0.11 1.00 117.653 2 10 0.526 0.006 0.11 0.11 1.00 140.904 2 10 0.444 0.006 0.14 0.14 1.00 119.655 3 10 0.525 0.007 0.13 0.13 1.00 140.406 3 10 0.444 0.006 0.14 0.14 1.00 118.95
Open 7 1 10 0.010 0.000 3.0008 2 10 0.011 0.000 3.1009 3 10 0.009 0.000 2.900
BBC 121 – PM – 40 – 20B
August 22, 2004 Doble Training45
Case 3 - Damaged Contact Assembly
Bushing Test kV I (mA) Watts % PF1 10 0.599 0.042 0.702 10 0.650 0.030 0.463 10 0.595 0.016 0.274 10 0.651 0.010 0.155 10 0.594 0.016 0.276 10 0.651 0.017 0.261 to 2 10 0.023 0.0253 to 4 10 0.021 0.0015 to 6 10 0.021 0.001
ABB 242 – PMR – 40 – 20
Higher power factors for open-breaker tests 1 and 2, and especiallyhigh losses across contact assembly in same phase. Contactassembly damaged by lightning strike.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training46
Case 4 - Deteriorated Grading Capacitor
Bushing Test kV I (mA) Watts % PF1 10 2.342 0.015 0.062 10 2.686 0.014 0.053 10 2.335 0.023 0.104 10 2.677 0.014 0.055 10 2.654 2.391 9.016 10 2.815 0.937 3.331 to 2 10 1.083 0.036 0.333 to 4 10 1.077 0.036 0.335 to 6 10 1.728 5.880 34.001 and 2 10 3.672 0.007 0.023 and 4 10 3.662 0.007 0.025 and 6 10 3.661 0.007 0.02
ABB 550 – PM – 40 – 30
August 22, 2004 Doble Training47
Vacuum Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training48
Vacuum Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training49
Vacuum Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training50
Power Factor Test
Free Standing Vacuum Circuit Breaker Procedure
• Bushings
- Hot-Collar
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker test
- 3 open-breaker USTs
• Insulating mineral oil in interrupter compartment
Applies to all single-contact vacuum circuit breakers.
Inherently low losses require bus disconnected.
All tests with circuit breaker open.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training51
Power Factor Test
Cubicle Vacuum Circuit Breaker Procedure
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker tests
- 3 open-breaker USTs
Applies to all single-contact vacuum circuit breakers.
All tests with circuit breaker open.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training52
Power Factor Test
Vacuum Circuit Breaker
Nothing connected to remaining bushings.
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test ModePosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue2 Open 2 - - GST Ground Red Blue3 Open 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue4 Open 4 - - GST Ground Red Blue5 Open 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue6 Open 6 - - GST Ground Red Blue7 Open 1 2 - UST Measure Red Blue8 Open 3 4 - UST Measure Red Blue9 Open 5 6 - UST Measure Red Blue
August 22, 2004 Doble Training53
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Left-side bushing• Operating rod• Any support insulation• Any phase barrier• Any insulating oil
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training54
Power Factor Test
Primarily stresses• Right-side bushing• Any support insulation• Any phase barrier• Any insulating oil
Open-Breaker Test, GST Ground Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training55
Power Factor Test
Measures• Vacuum interrupter• Any phase barrier• Any insulating oil
Open-Breaker UST Test, UST Mode
August 22, 2004 Doble Training56
It is necessary to address specific aspects of the analysis of resultsand investigation of questionable results, to include:
• Temperature correction
Results vacuum circuit breakers not corrected for temperaturevariation
• Very low capacitance specimen
- current is 300 µA (80 pF) or less: evaluate dielectric loss
test performed at several voltages: evaluate dielectric lossand its increase
- current is greater than 300 µA (80 pF): evaluate power factorand capacitance
test performed at several voltages: evaluate power factor atlowest test voltage, power factor tip-up and capacitance
Analysis Policies - Vacuum
August 22, 2004 Doble Training57
Analysis of Results - Vacuum
Compare results:
• with factory data (acceptance test)
• with earlier tests (especially first acceptable test)
• among similar test specimens
- among similar tests
tests (1, 3 and 5) (2, 4 and 6) (7, 8 and 9)
- among phases
- among similar vacuum circuit breakers
• with Doble’s database and typical results (TDRB)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training58
Analysis of Results - Vacuum
Tests 1 to 6
• Dominated by bushing
also includes operating rod, any support insulation, any phasebarrier, any mineral oil
• PF generally less than 2.0 %
Diagnostic
• High losses or high PF
degraded bushing, operating rod, support insulation, phasebarrier, insulating mineral oil
- bushing Hot-Collar test
- test insulating mineral oil in interrupter compartment
- internal inspection
August 22, 2004 Doble Training59
Analysis of Results - Vacuum
Tests 7, 8 and 9
• Vacuum interrupter
also includes any phase barriers and any mineral oil
• Very low current, evaluate losses
losses generally 0.010 Watts or less
Diagnostic
• High losses
degraded vacuum interrupter, any phase barrier, any mineral oil
- test any insulating mineral oil in interrupter compartment
- clean vacuum interrupter
- remove any phase barriers
- also, perform AC or DC high-potential test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training60
Case 5 - Deteriorated Bushing
Bushing Test kV I (mA) Watts % PF1 10 0.238 0.037 1.552 10 0.223 0.039 1.753 10 0.236 0.033 1.404 10 0.224 0.049 2.195 10 0.239 0.035 1.466 10 0.221 0.038 1.72
1 to 2 10 0.047 0.0033 to 4 10 0.047 0.0025 to 6 10 0.047 0.002
August 22, 2004 Doble Training61
Oil Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training62
Oil Circuit Breaker
• Bushings
- C1 insulation
- C2 insulation
- Hot-Collar
• Breaker
- 6 open-breaker tests
- 3 closed-breaker tests
- calculate tank-loss index
• Insulating mineral oil
Power Factor Test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training63
Oil Circuit Breaker
No test or ground lead connected to remaining bushings.
Power Factor Test
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test ModePosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue2 Open 2 - - GST Ground Red Blue3 Open 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue4 Open 4 - - GST Ground Red Blue5 Open 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue6 Open 6 - - GST Ground Red Blue7 Closed 1 - - GST Ground Red Blue8 Closed 3 - - GST Ground Red Blue9 Closed 5 - - GST Ground Red Blue
August 22, 2004 Doble Training64
GST Ground
Meter
Stresses• Bushing• Contact assembly• Guide assembly• Upper portion of lift rod
Open-Breaker Test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training65
GST Ground
Meter Oil
Stresses• Bushings• Contact assemblies• Lower portion of lift rod• Any tank liner• Oil
Closed-Breaker Test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training66
Analysis Policies - Oil Circuit Breaker
It is necessary to address specific aspects of the analysis of resultsand investigation of questionable results, to include:
• Tank Loss Index
• Temperature correction
Results for most oil circuit breakers corrected for temperaturevariation
• Peculiarities
- high external surface losses across upper weathershed
- high external surface losses across lower insulation
August 22, 2004 Doble Training67
Primary contributors to lossesOpen-Breaker Test Closed-Breaker Test
• Bushing • Bushings• Contact assembly • Contact assemblies• Guide assembly • Lower portion of lift rod• Upper portion of lift rod • Any tank liner
• Oil
Lessor contributors to lossesOpen-Breaker Test Closed-Breaker Test
• Any tank liner • Guide assembly• Oil
Tank Loss Index
August 22, 2004 Doble Training68
Tank Loss Index
• Open-breaker and especially closed-breaker power factorsdominated by bushings
• Created to analyze condition of remaining insulation
• Calculated for each phase
• Not affected by bushing surface conditions
assuming same surface conditions for Open- and Closed tests
August 22, 2004 Doble Training69
Negative TLI Positive
Contact assemblies Lower portion of lift rodGuide assembly,especially any cross-guide
Any tank linerOil
Upper portion of lift rod
Guidelines for investigating abnormal TLI for oil circuit breakersWatts, referenced to 10 kV
< - 0.20 < - 0.10 to - 0.20 - 0.10 to + 0.05 > + 0.05 to + 0.10 > + 0.10investigate retest normal for most
breakersretest investigate
Tank Loss Index
TLI = Closed-Breaker Losses - Sum of Open-Breaker Losses
August 22, 2004 Doble Training70
Tank Loss Index
What happens to TLI if:
• Water enters oil… swings positive
• Water enters contact assemblies... swings negative
• Water and carbon collect on lift rod... swings positive
• Water saturates tank liner... swings positive
August 22, 2004 Doble Training71
Temperature Correction
Power factors are corrected to a reference temperature of 20°Cusing the following guidelines.
• Bushings
correct C1 insulation power factor using ambient temperature
C2 power factor is not corrected for temperature variation
• Breaker
correct power factor using ambient temperature and bushingpower factor-temperature characteristic
• Insulating mineral oil
correct power factor using oil temperature and oil power factor-temperature characteristic
August 22, 2004 Doble Training72
TABLE OF MULTIPLIERS FOR USE IN CONVERTING POWER FACTOR ATTEST TEMPERATURES TO POWER FACTORS AT 20°C
ABB HAEFELY LAPPTest Type Type Types Class Class
Temperature T O + C COT,COS PRC POC°C °F SOT 15-69 kV 15-765 kV0 32.0 1.02 .87 - .81 1.004 39.2 1.02 .91 - .86 1.008 46.4 1.01 .93 - .89 1.00
12 53.6 1.01 .95 .90 .94 1.0016 60.8 1.00 .98 .95 .97 1.0020 68.0 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0024 75.2 1.00 1.02 1.04 1.03 1.0028 82.4 .99 1.04 1.09 1.07 1.0032 89.6 .97 1.06 1.13 1.11 1.0036 96.8 .96 1.07 1.17 1.13 1.0040 104.0 .94 1.08 1.21 1.15 1.0044 111.2 .91 1.10 1.24 1.15 1.0048 118.4 .87 1.11 126 1.14 1.0052 125.6 .84 1.11 1.28 1.11 1.0056 132.8 .79 1.11 1.30 1.07 1.0060 140.0 .75 1.12 1.27 1.05 1.00
Temperature Correction
August 22, 2004 Doble Training73
TABLE OF MULTIPLIERS FOR USE IN CONVERTING POWER FACTOR ATTEST TEMPERATURES TO POWER FACTORS AT 20°C
Test ConventionalTemperature Insulating Oil°C °F0 32.0 1.564 39.2 1.488 46.4 1.43
12 53.6 1.3116 60.8 1.1620 68.0 1.0024 75.2 .8328 82.4 .7032 89.6 .5836 96.8 .4940 104.0 .4244 111.2 .3648 118.4 .3052 125.6 .2656 132.8 .2160 140.0 .17
Temperature Correction
August 22, 2004 Doble Training74
Analysis of Results - Oil Circuit Breaker
Compare results:
• with factory data (acceptance test)
• with earlier tests (especially first acceptable test)
• among similar test specimens
- among similar tests
▪ open-breaker tests
▪ closed-breaker tests
- among phases (including TLIs)
- among similar oil circuit breakers
• with Doble’s database and typical results (TDRB)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training75
Analysis of Results - Oil Circuit Breaker
In general, an oil circuit breaker is in satisfactory condition when itmeets the following criteria:
• Open-breaker power factors approximate respective bushing C1power factor
• Closed-breaker power factors approximate average of 2respective bushing C1 power factors
• TLI’s are in range of - 0.10 to + 0.05 Watts
August 22, 2004 Doble Training76
Tank Loss Index
Bushing C1 Insulation TestsBushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 1.024 0.027 0.262 1.016 0.025 0.25
Breaker TestsBreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
Open 1 1.152 0.034 0.30Open 2 1.154 0.032 0.28
Closed 1 and 2 2.204 0.058 0.26TLI = – 0.008 Watts
Example 1, acceptable condition
Comment: Bushing C1 insulation power factors, open- and closed-breaker power factors and TLI are acceptable
August 22, 2004 Doble Training77
Tank Loss Index
Bushing C1 Insulation TestsBushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 1.024 0.027 0.262 1.016 0.094 0.93
Breaker TestsBreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
Open 1 1.152 0.034 0.30Open 2 1.154 0.101 0.88
Closed 1 and 2 2.204 0.127 0.58TLI = – 0.008 Watts
Example 2, deteriorated No. 2 bushing
Comment: High No. 2 bushing C1 insulation power factor and HighNo. 2 open-breaker power factor with acceptable TLI.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training78
Tank Loss Index
Example 3, deteriorated contact assemblies, guide assembly andupper portion of lift rod
Comment: High No. 2 open-breaker power factor and highnegative TLI.
Bushing C1 Insulation TestsBushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 1.024 0.027 0.262 1.016 0.025 0.25
Breaker TestsBreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
Open 1 1.152 0.132 1.15Open 2 1.154 0.135 1.17
Closed 1 and 2 2.204 0.119 0.54TLI = – 0.148 Watts
August 22, 2004 Doble Training79
Tank Loss Index
Example 4, deteriorated lower portion of lift rod, tank liner and oil
Comment: High positive TLI. Test oil.
Bushing C1 Insulation TestsBushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 1.024 0.027 0.262 1.016 0.025 0.25
Breaker TestsBreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
Open 1 1.152 0.054 0.47Open 2 1.154 0.049 0.42
Closed 1 and 2 2.204 0.227 1.03TLI = + 0.124 Watts
August 22, 2004 Doble Training80
Tank Loss Index
Example 5, general contamination of internal insulation
Comment: High open- and closed-breaker power factors withacceptable TLI. Surface contamination of bushings? Probably not.Hot-Collar test. Test oil.
Bushing C1 Insulation TestsBushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 1.024 0.027 0.262 1.016 0.025 0.25
Breaker TestsBreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
Open 1 1.152 0.172 1.49Open 2 1.154 0.167 1.45
Closed 1 and 2 2.204 0.372 1.69TLI = + 0.033 Watts
August 22, 2004 Doble Training81
Case 6 - Breaker Not Completely Closed
Test BreakerPosition
Bushing I (mA) Watts % PF
1 Open 1 0.282 0.035 1.22 Open 2 0.294 0.038 1.33 Open 3 0.283 0.029 1.04 Open 4 0.303 0.041 1.45 Open 5 0.279 0.035 1.26 Open 6 0.303 0.040 1.37 Closed 1 and 2 0.715 0.081 1.08 Closed 3 and 4 0.722 0.076 1.19 Closed 5 and 6 0.455 0.420 9.2
TLI (Watts), Phase 1 = + 0.008, Phase 2 = + 0.006, Phase 3 = +0.345 Breaker did not close properly.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training82
Diagnostic Test on Interrupter
2 kV Power Factor Guidelines
Good 10 - 30 %
Questionable 30 - 50
Bad > 50
August 22, 2004 Doble Training83
Diagnostic Test on Wood Components
Material Maximum Limitfor two 3-inch sections
Watts at 10 kV MW at 2.5 kVvarnish woodor plastic-covered components
0.25 15
epoxy-fiber components 0.10 6
August 22, 2004 Doble Training84
Power Factor Test - Oil Circuit Breaker
Summary
• Measure bushing C1 and C2 power factors
and hot-collar losses
• Measure open- and closed-breaker power factors
power factor corrected to 20°C using ambient temperature andbushing characteristic
calculate TLI for each phase
• Measure oil power factor
power factor corrected to 20°C using oil temperature and oilcharacteristic
• Analyze results
perform necessary diagnostic tests
August 22, 2004 Doble Training85
Air-Magnetic Circuit Breakers
Westinghouse Type DHP, 13.8 kV
August 22, 2004 Doble Training86
Air-Magnetic Circuit Breakers
• 6 Open-breaker Guard tests
• 3 Open-breaker USTs
All tests with breaker open.
Power Factor Test
August 22, 2004 Doble Training87
Air-Magnetic Circuit Breakers
Nothing connected to remaining bushings.
Power Factor Tests - Air-Magnetic
Test Breaker HV LV Lead Test ModePosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open 1 2 - GST Guard Red Blue2 Open 2 1 - GST Guard Red Blue3 Open 3 4 - GST Guard Red Blue4 Open 4 3 - GST Guard Red Blue5 Open 5 6 - GST Guard Red Blue6 Open 6 5 - GST Guard Red Blue7 Open 1 2 - UST Measure Red Blue8 Open 3 4 - UST Measure Red Blue9 Open 5 6 - UST Measure Red Blue
August 22, 2004 Doble Training88
It is necessary to address specific aspects of the analysis of resultsand investigation of questionable results, to include:
• Temperature correction
Results for air-magnetic circuit breakers not corrected fortemperature variation
• Very low capacitance specimen
- current is 300 µA (80 pF) or less: evaluate dielectric loss
test performed at several voltages: evaluate dielectric lossand its increase
- current is greater than 300 µA (80 pF): evaluate power factorand capacitance
test performed at several voltages: evaluate power factormeasured at lowest test voltage, power factor tip-up andcapacitance
Analysis Policies - Air-Magnetic
August 22, 2004 Doble Training89
• Abnormally low or negative power factor
Analysis Policies - Air-Magnetic
August 22, 2004 Doble Training90
Analysis of Results - Air-Magnetic
Compare results:
• with factory data (acceptance test)
• with earlier tests (especially first acceptable test)
• among similar test specimens
- among similar tests
tests (1, 3 and 5) (2, 4 and 6) (7, 8 and 9)
- among phases
- among similar air-magnetic circuit breakers
• with Doble’s database and typical results (TDRB)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training91
Analysis of Results - Air-Magnetic
Tests 1 to 6
• Dominated by bushing
also includes operating rod, puffer assembly, phase barrier,auxiliary insulation
Diagnostic
• High losses or high PF
degraded bushing, operating rod, puffer assembly, phasebarrier, auxiliary insulation
- repeat tests with phase barriers and arc-chute removed
August 22, 2004 Doble Training92
Analysis of Results - Air-Magnetic
Tests 7, 8 and 9
• Arc-chute and phase barrier
• Very low current, evaluate losses
Diagnostic
• High losses
- clean and dry arc-chutes and phase barriers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training93
Case 7 - Deteriorated Air-Magnetic Breaker
Bushing Test kV I (mA) Watts % PF1 10 1.023 0.952 9.312 10 1.007 0.378 3.753 10 0.992 0.645 6.504 10 1.047 0.363 3.475 10 0.856 0.442 5.166 10 1.092 0.569 5.211 to 2 10 0.148 0.4183 to 4 10 0.154 0.4535 to 6 10 0.175 0.648
General Electric Type AM, 13.8 kV. Maximum limits are 5.0 % for bushing PF’s and0.50 Watts for arc-chute losses.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training94
Live-Tank Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training95
I-Module Live-Tank Circuit Breakers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training96
Single I-Module Circuit Breaker
• 1 interrupter chamber test
• 1 column test
All tests with breaker open.
Power Factor Test, Single I-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training97
Power Factor Test, Single I-Module
C1 = Interrupter chamberS1C = Support insulatorS1R = Operating rod
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test Mode InsulationPosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open B A - UST Measure Red Ground Blue C12 Open B A - GST Guard Red Blue S1C + S1R
3 Open B A - GST Ground Red Blue C1 + (S1C + S1R)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training98
Power Factor Test, Single I-Module
Test 1
UST Measure Red Blue
August 22, 2004 Doble Training99
Power Factor Test, Single I-Module
Test 2
GST Guard Red Blue
August 22, 2004 Doble Training100
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
ABB Type HPL-362-A2, 362 kV
August 22, 2004 Doble Training101
Single T- or Y-Module Circuit Breaker
• 2 interrupter chamber and grading capacitor tests
• 1 column test
All tests with breaker open.
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training102
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
C1, C2 = Interrupter chambersGC1, GC2 = Grading capacitors
S1C = Support insulatorS1R = Operating rod
Test Breaker HV LV Leads Test Mode InsulationPosition Cable Red Blue
1 Open D A B UST Measure Red Ground Blue C1 + GC12 Open D A B UST Measure Blue Ground Red C2 + GC23 Open D A B GST Guard Red Blue S1C + S1R
August 22, 2004 Doble Training103
Test 1
UST Measure Red Ground Blue
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training104
Test 2
UST Measure Blue Ground Red
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training105
Test 3
GST Guard Red Blue
Power Factor Test, Single T- and Y-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training106
Reyrolle 500 kV
Power Factor Test, Multiple-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training107
Power Factor Test, Multiple-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training108
Power Factor Test, Multiple-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training109
Power Factor Test, Multiple-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training110
Multiple T- or Y-Module Circuit Breaker
• Test each interrupter chamber (normally by UST)
• Test each column (normally by GST Guard)
• Test each operating rod if separated from column
All tests with breaker open.
Power Factor Test, Multiple-Module
August 22, 2004 Doble Training111
Complex Live-Tank Circuit Breakers
BBC Type DLF
Tests 1 to 4 measure interrupter chambers.Test 5 measures column.
Test Energize Ground Guard UST1 B C, F A2 B A, F C3 D E, F C4 D C, F E5 F B, D
August 22, 2004 Doble Training112
• Temperature correction
Results for live-tank circuit breakers not corrected fortemperature variation. An exception is grading capacitorassemblies for General Electric 115/230/345-kV type ATBbreakers.
• Very low capacitance specimen
- current is 300 µA (80 pF) or less: evaluate dielectric loss
test performed at several voltages: evaluate dielectric lossand its increasec
- current is greater than 300 µA (80 pF): evaluate power factorand capacitance
test performed at several voltages: evaluate power factormeasured at lowest test voltage, power factor tip-up andcapacitance
Analysis Policies - Live-Tank
August 22, 2004 Doble Training113
• Abnormally low or negative power factor
investigate electrostatic interference effect
Analysis Policies - Live-Tank
August 22, 2004 Doble Training114
High Levels of Electrostatic Interference
M2H instrument
• Shielding
• Line synchronized reversal
Average of normal and 180° reversed readings at 60 Hz. Is onlyeffective when specimen current is greater than interferencecurrent.
• Polarity indicator
• Interference cancellation circuit (ICC)
August 22, 2004 Doble Training115
High Levels of Electrostatic Interference
M4000 instrument
• Shielding
• Line synchronized reversal
Average of normal and 180° reversed readings at 60 Hz. Is onlyeffective when specimen current is greater than interferencecurrent.
• Line frequency modulation
Average of two readings at ±5% (or ±10%) of the line frequency,e.g. 57 and 63 Hz. This method minimizes effects ofelectrostatic interference and yields superior results in highlevels of electrostatic interference.
August 22, 2004 Doble Training116
Compare results:
• with factory data (acceptance test)
• with earlier tests (especially first acceptable test)
• among similar test specimens
- among similar tests
- among similar phases
- among similar circuit breakers
• with Doble’s database and typical results (TDRB)
Analysis of Results - Live-Tank Breaker
August 22, 2004 Doble Training117
Analysis of Results - Live-Tank Breaker
Interrupter chamber (with grading capacitor)
• dominated by grading capacitor
also includes interrupter chamber and any resistor switchchamber
• Power factor generally less than 1.0 %
Diagnostic
• High power factor
degraded grading capacitor, interrupter chamber, resistor switchchamber
- test separately grading capacitor, interrupter chamber andresistor switch chamber
August 22, 2004 Doble Training118
Analysis of Results - Live-Tank Breaker
Interrupter chamber (no grading capacitor)
• Includes interrupter chamber, any resistor switch chamber
• Very low current, evaluate losses
• Losses generally 0.020 Watts or less
Diagnostic
• High losses
degraded interrupter chamber, resistor switch chamber
- test separately interrupter chamber, resistor switch chamber
August 22, 2004 Doble Training119
Analysis of Results - Live-Tank Breaker
Columns
• Very low current, evaluate losses
• Losses generally 0.030 Watts or less
• Very sensitive to external surface conditions
Diagnostic
• High losses
- perhaps operate breaker and re-test
- test individual column sections
- check for leaks
August 22, 2004 Doble Training120
Case 8 - Deteriorated Grading Capacitor
C1 C2
S1Test Ph Insul Test I (mA) Watts % PF Cap
kV (pF)1 A C1 10 3.801 0.165 0.43 12092 A C2 10 3.811 0.169 0.44 12133 A S1 10 0.196 0.011 624 B C1 10 3.818 0.190 0.50 12155 B C2 10 3.823 0.187 0.49 12166 B S1 10 0.199 0.012 637 C C1 10 3.830 0.205 0.54 12198 C C2 10 3.809 0.369 0.97 12129 C S1 10 0.187 0.008 59
AEG Type S2 – 420, 420 kV
August 22, 2004 Doble Training121
Case 8 - Deteriorated Grading Capacitor
C1 C2
S1Individual grading capacitor tests
Test Phase Capacitor 2 kV 10 kV % PF% PF % PF Tip-Up
1 A C2 0.42 0.42 0.002 B C2 0.46 0.46 0.003 C C2 1.20 0.97 - 0.23
C-phase C2 grading capacitor was replaced
AEG Type S2 – 420, 420 kV
August 22, 2004 Doble Training122
Case 9 - Contaminated SF6 Gas
Siemens 3AT5, 500 kV
Column Test kV I (mA) Watts1 10 0.160 0.0182 10 0.155 0.0123 10 0.161 0.0104 10 0.158 0.0085 10 0.160 0.1806 10 0.166 0.160
Gas PurityColumns 1 and 2 99.7 %Columns 3 and 4 99.5 %Columns 5 and 6 91.7 %
August 22, 2004 Doble Training123
Case 9 - Contaminated SF6 Gas
After 24-hour vacuum and SF6 gas restored to better than 99 %pure.
Column Test kV I (mA) Watts5 10 0.173 0.0246 10 0.175 0.032
Siemens 3AT5, 500 kV
August 22, 2004 Doble Training124
Complex Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breakers
ABB PASS circuit breaker, includes a circuit breaker, disconnector, ground switch and metering unit
August 22, 2004 Doble Training125
Current Transformers
August 22, 2004 Doble Training126
Power Factor Test
Routine procedure is determined by the type of insulation andwhether it has a tap:
• liquid- and gas-filled
- no tap
▪ Overall
▪ Hot-Collar
- with tap
▪ Overall
▪ C1 insulation
▪ C2 insulation
▪ Hot-Collar
August 22, 2004 Doble Training127
Power Factor Test
• dry-type
- Overall at several voltages
August 22, 2004 Doble Training128
Complex Dead Tank SF6 Circuit Breakers
ABB PASS Circuit breaker, included circuit breaker, disconnector, ground switch and metering unit
August 22, 2004 Doble Training129
ABB PASS M0 Circuit breaker, included circuit breaker, disconnector and ground switch
August 22, 2004 Doble Training130
ABB PASS M0 Circuit breaker, included circuit breaker, disconnector and ground switch