no. 39 silverleaves ave. silverleaves phillip island
TRANSCRIPT
No. 39 SILVERLEAVES AVE.
SILVERLEAVES
PHILLIP ISLAND
COASTAL HAZARD
VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT
prepared for
Zacacorp Builders Pty Ltd
March 2013
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C
Document Title Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment
Property at No. 39 Silverleaves Ave., Silverleaves
Client Zacacorp Pty Ltd
Document Code 13-756vic-pobrp
First Issue Date 05th March 2013
Document Status Record
Revision Date
Chapter/section/pages revised,
plus any remarks.
Authority
code Revised Author Reviewed
A 05Mar13 Initial Release POB HPR
B 07Mar13 Arithmetic correction made POB HPR
C 04Jun13 Include Melbourne Water levels HPR POB
Coastal Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd
25 Wirilda Way
Fish Creek
VIC 3959
Australia
tel : + 61 3 5683 2495
email : [email protected]
Coastal Engineering Solutions Pty Ltd
P.O. Box 677
59 Hulcombe Road
Samford QLD 4520
Australia
tel : + 61 7 3289 7011
fax : + 61 7 3289 7022
email : [email protected]
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C
Table of Contents
SUMMARY........................................................................................................................................... 1
1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................ 2
1.1 General .................................................................................................................................. 2
1.2 Location and Property Characteristics .................................................................................. 2
2 ASSESSMENT PARAMETERS .............................................................................................. 4
2.1 Overview ................................................................................................................................ 4
2.2 Storm Tide and Surge ............................................................................................................ 5
2.3 Coastal Processes .................................................................................................................. 7
3 PRESENT-DAY VULNERABILITY ......................................................................................... 9
3.1 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event..................................................... 9
3.1.1 Existing Inundation Risk ............................................................................................ 9
3.1.2 Existing Coastal Erosion Risk ................................................................................... 9
3.2 Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 9
4 VULNERABILITY OVER A PLANNING PERIOD TO 2040 ......................................... 10
4.1 Storm Parameters................................................................................................................ 10
4.2 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event................................................... 10
4.2.1 Inundation Risk in 2040 ........................................................................................... 10
4.2.2 Coastal Erosion Risk in 2040 .................................................................................. 10
4.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 10
5 VULNERABILITY OVER A PLANNING PERIOD TO 2100 ......................................... 11
5.1 Storm Parameters................................................................................................................ 11
5.2 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event................................................... 11
5.2.1 Inundation Risk in 2100 ........................................................................................... 11
5.2.2 Coastal Erosion Risk in 2100 .................................................................................. 11
5.3 Mitigation ............................................................................................................................ 11
6 REFERENCES .......................................................................................................................... 13
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 1
SUMMARY
The property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue in Silverleaves on Phillip Island is the subject
of a proposed planning application for a double storey house. In accordance with the
Victorian Coastal Strategy 2008, this Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment (CHVA)
has been completed for the site.
At the time that the original CHVA was prepared in March 2012 the Client was not aware
that Melbourne Water had prepared over-riding flood levels for Westernport and Port Phillip
Bays. This revised CHVA has been prepared to include the Melbourne Water criteria.
No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue is set back some 78 metres from the natural shoreline of
Westernport Bay. This considerable physical buffer consists of naturally vegetated sand
ridges - with ridge levels exceeding +5 metres AHD in height. Consideration of existing
and likely future coastal processes indicate that the proposed development is well beyond
the effects of any shoreline erosion in the period up to and including 2100.
Existing land levels vary over the property - being approximately +3.04 metres AHD at the
northern (rear) property boundary, sloping down to approximately +1.94 metres AHD at the
south-west corner of the block (fronting Silverleaves Avenue). Apart from a small area at
the south-west corner of the property, these levels are above the influences of 100 year
return period storm tide events as defined by CSIRO. However, Melbourne Water
nominates a 100 year flood level for Westernport Bay of +2.7 metres AHD; consequently
whilst the property is currently not at risk of storm tide inundation it is at risk from flooding.
By 2040, the combined effects of future climate change (including predicted sea level rise
and increased “storminess”) mean that the occurrence of a 100 year return period storm at
that time will be such that there will be minor inundation from elevated sea levels due to the
storm tide across the street-side property boundary - up to a depth of around 51cm only.
Habitable areas of the proposed redevelopment will not be at risk of inundation by this
ocean storm tide during this possible future scenario. However, Melbourne Water
nominates a 100 year flood level for Westernport Bay of +2.9 metres AHD for the year
2040 and also requires a 600mm freeboard above this level. Consequently to
accommodate this criterion, the minimum floor level for the redevelopment will need to be
set at +3.5 metres AHD.
For the predicted climate change scenario in the year 2100, existing ground levels are such
that there would be some inundation across the property during a 100 year ARI event due
to the storm tide at that time. Based on the existing ground levels, the maximum depth of
such inundation could be around 111cm at the front of the property - reducing to around nil
at the rear boundary. However, the Melbourne Water requirement for flooding in the year
2100, nominates a flood level of +3.5 metres AHD - requiring a minimum habitable floor
level of +4.1 metres AHD so as to include a 600mm freeboard.
Whilst much of the land may be inundated during a 100 year ARI flood event in future
years of 2040 and 2100, safe egress from the property would still be available via the
higher coastal dune system.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 2
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 General
A double storey house is proposed on the property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue in
Silverleaves on Phillip Island. Drawings for the works have been prepared by Chaule Architect
Pty Ltd as part of the planning approvals process. The applicant has requested that a Coastal
Hazard Vulnerability Assessment (CHVA) for the subject site be prepared in accordance with
the requirements of the Victorian Coastal Strategy 2008 and the Victorian Coastal Hazard
Guide 2012. Flooding criteria introduced by Melbourne Water in 2012 for Westernport and
Port Phillip bays will be the dominant criteria in terms of inundation.
This Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment includes:
A description of the relevant sea level, storm and foreshore characteristics.
Shoreline and site vulnerability to a storm having a 100 year return period for the present-
day climate scenario.
Corresponding shoreline and site vulnerability (including future climate change influences)
over a planning period that extends to the year 2040.
Shoreline and site vulnerability (including future climate change influences) over a planning
period to 2100.
The vulnerability of the site to coastal hazards over these various timeframes include the
effects of future sea level rise (and other associated increases in storm parameters) as
nominated in the Victorian Coastal Strategy 2008 and flood levels as nominated in
Melbourne Water, 2012.
1.2 Location and Property Characteristics
The location of 39 Silverleaves Avenue in relation to Westernport Bay is shown conceptually
on Figure 1.
The property is set back some 78 metres from the natural shoreline of the Bay. This physical
buffer consists of naturally vegetated sand ridges - with ridge levels exceeding +5 metres AHD
in height.
A survey1 of the site indicates that existing land levels vary over the property - being
approximately +3.04 metres AHD at the northern (rear) property boundary, sloping down to
approximately +1.94 metres AHD at the south-west corner of the block (fronting Silverleaves
Avenue).
Concept plans show that the proposed Finished Floor Levels of habitable areas throughout the
lower levels of the house are proposed at +2.94 metres AHD.
1 Drawing Reference No.A1, dated May 2012 prepared by Chaule Architect Pty Ltd. (under Job No. 1111).
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 3
Figure 1 : Location of No. 39 Silverleaves Ave in relation to Westernport Bay
Figure 2 : Local foreshore frontage to Westernport Bay
No. 39 Silverleaves Ave
Westernport
Bay
Phillip
Island
French
Island
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 4
2 ASSESSMENT PARAMETERS
2.1 Overview
The Victorian Coastal Strategy 2008 includes a policy to plan for a rise above present-day sea
levels of not less than 0.8m by the year 2100. In June 2009 the Victorian State Government
appointed a Coastal Climate Change Advisory Committee (CCCAC) to consider and
recommend appropriate planning responses to the implications of future climate change to the
state's coastal regions.
The CCCAC’s Final Report was released by the Minister for Planning on the 5th June 2012. A
number of recommendations have been accepted by the Government - including the following
amendments to the State Planning Policy Framework which have particular relevance to the
proposed development:
In planning for possible sea level rise, an increase of 0.2 metres over current 1 in 100 year
flood levels by 2040 may be used for new development in close proximity to existing
development (urban infill).
Plan for possible sea level rise of 0.8 metres by 2100, and allow for the combined effects of
tides, storm surges, coastal processes and local conditions such as topography and
geology when assessing risks and coastal impacts associated with climate change.
In conjunction with predicted sea level rise, there are other climate change influences that
need to be addressed - primarily as a consequence of increased “storminess” and the
associated increase in storm tide levels along Victoria’s shoreline.
These factors have been addressed in a CSIRO report (McInnes, et. al. 2005): “Climate
change in Eastern Victoria: Stage 2 report: the effect of climate change on storm surges: a
project undertaken for the Gippsland Coastal Board”. That 2005 study included the
Westernport Bay region.
At about the same time that the CCCAC’s Final Report was released, two further documents
were issued:
Victorian Coastal Hazard Guide (DSE, 2012)
Melbourne Water produced a document Planning for sea level rise, 2012, which
defined flood levels from present-day through to 2100; and also nominated a
mandatory freeboard of 600mm above these levels for habitable floor levels. This
freeboard is nominated to allow for wave effects on top of the flood level.
The information from these documents has been considered in the preparation of the CHVA.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 5
2.2 Storm Tide and Surge
Figure 3 illustrates the primary water level components of a storm tide event. Any increase in
ocean water levels as a consequence of future climate change would be in addition to these
various natural phenomena. A brief discussion of these components is offered below.
Figure 3 : Components of a Storm Tide Event
Astronomical Tide: The astronomical tide is the normal day-to-day rising and falling of
ocean waters in response to the gravitational influences of the sun and the moon. The
astronomical tide can be predicted with considerable accuracy. Astronomical tide is an
important component of the overall storm tide because if the peak of a severe storm were
to coincide with a high spring tide for instance, severe flooding of low lying coastal areas
can occur and the upper sections of coastal structures can be subjected to severe wave
action.
Storm Surge : This increase in ocean water levels is caused by meteorological effects
during severe storms. Strong winds blowing over the surface of the ocean forces water
against the coast at a greater rate that it can flow back to sea. Furthermore sea levels can
rise locally when a low pressure system occurs over the sea - resulting in what is termed
an “inverted barometer” effect. A 10mb drop in atmospheric pressure results in an
approximate 10 cm rise in sea level. In order to predict the height of storm surges, these
various influences and their complex interaction are typically replicated by numerical
modelling techniques using computers - such as has been done for the CSIRO study for
Victoria (McInnes et al, 2005).
Breaking Wave Setup: As storm waves propagate into shallower coastal waters, they
begin to shoal and will break as they encounter the nearshore region. The dissipation of
wave energy during the wave breaking process induces a localised increase in the ocean
water level shoreward of the breaking point which is called breaking wave setup. Through
the continued action of many breaking waves, the setup experienced on a foreshore during
a severe wave event can be sustained for a significant timeframe and needs to be
considered as an important component of the overall storm tide on a foreshore.
ASTRONOMICAL TIDE
SURGE
WAVE SETUP
WAVE RUNUP
STORM TIDE
INCOMING WAVES BROKEN WAVES WAVES ARE BREAKING
LOW WATER DATUM
COASTLINE
Storm Tide = Astronomical Tide + Storm Surge + Breaking Wave Setup
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 6
Wave Runup: Wave runup is the vertical height above the local water level up to which
incoming waves will rush when they encounter the land/sea interface. The level to which
waves will run up a structure or natural foreshore depends significantly on the nature, slope
and extent of the land boundary, as well as the characteristics of the incident waves.
Future climate change scenarios indicate there will be increases in the magnitude of storm
surges due to changed meteorological conditions. The CSIRO report (McInnes, et. al. 2005)
determines the combined effects of future sea level rise and storm tide for a 100 year return
period in Westernport Bay at the nearby coastal location of Stony Point, some 12km north-
north-east of Silverleaves. Given the close proximity of Stony Point to Silverleaves, it is
appropriate for the purposes of this CHVA to adopt the reported storm tide levels at Stony
Point as being indicative of those on foreshores fronting Silverleaves.
The CSIRO report provides predictions for the years 2005, 2030 and 2070 under a range of
possible climate change scenarios - termed low, mid and high-range scenarios. The high-
range storm tide levels are shown plotted below on Figure 4, with storm tide levels
extrapolated to the year 2100.
Figure 4 : Plots of predictions for sea level rise and associated storm tide levels
Based on predictions by CSIRO (McInnes et al, 2005)
The storm tide levels in Figure 4 are consistent with those cited in DSE, 2012. Reference to
these results indicate that the ocean water levels summarised below in Table 1 can be used as
predictions for 100 year return period storm tide levels at Silverleaves under future climate
change scenarios.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 7
Location Current Climate 2040 2100
Silverleaves +2.12 +2.45 +3.05
Table 1 : Predicted 100 year Return Period Storm Tide Levels at Silverleaves
(metres above AHD)
It is pertinent to note that the predicted storm tide level of +2.45m AHD in the year 2040 is 0.33
metres above the predicted present-day level; and differs from the 0.2 metre stated in the
State Planning Policy Framework. This is because by necessity it also includes the effects that
climate change has on meteorological conditions and therefore on future storm surges - not
just a 0.2 metre sea level rise.
However, the CSIRO determinations do not allow for flood levels defined by Melbourne Water.
These flood levels are presented in Table 2.
Location Current Climate 2040 2100
Westernport Bay
(Silverleaves) +2.7 +2.9 +3. 5
Table 2 : Predicted 100 year Return Period Flood Levels at Silverleaves (Melbourne Water) (metres above AHD)
2.3 Coastal Processes
The term “coastal processes” is used to classify the naturally prevailing conditions of waves
and currents that shape and control the stability of foreshores. In this instance, the property at
No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue is located some 78 metres inland from the natural shoreline that
exists along Westernport Bay in this area of Silverleaves. This high naturally vegetated dune
area provides a substantial physical buffer between the property and the waters of the Bay.
The preceding Figure 2 provides a general appreciation of the local setting and nature of the
foreshore opposite No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue.
The coastal processes at the shoreline are driven by the prevailing north-west (winter) to
south-west (summer) winds which generate waves across the Bay from these respective
directions. There will also be some significantly attenuated residual swell entering nearshore
waters from Bass Strait.
The result is a coastal regime where the predominant movement of sand on the local foreshore
is from west towards east. Whilst the beach is mobile, the position of the shoreline has
remained fairly constant in recent decades, implying that there is a sufficient natural supply of
sand to match the volume of sand moved eastward by the waves.
Nevertheless there will be storm events that cause cross-shore erosion of the beach. However
ambient wave conditions following an erosion event will act to restore the beach over time.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 8
The foreshore dunes have a crest level of approximately +5 metres AHD. Natural land levels
behind the dune system are lower - tending to be in the range of +2 metres to +3 metres AHD.
The very substantial 78 metre wide physical buffer between the intertidal beach and the
seaward-most property boundary of 39 Silverleaves Avenue is adequate to accommodate
episodic erosion associated with 100 year ARI storms - even accounting for future climate
change influences to the year 2100. This conclusion is based on experience of similar wave
climate and coastal environments worldwide rather than site specific modelling or calculations
for Solverleaves.
The metocean and nearshore bathymetric survey data required to undertake meaningful site
specific modelling at Silverleaves does not exist. Given the very substantial costs associated
with a detailed Coastal Process Study for the local foreshore it is not practical or equitable to
expect the project proponent to provide it. It is understood that a regional CHVA is presently
being produced for Westernport Bay which should include the necessary modelling or
computations.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 9
3 PRESENT-DAY VULNERABILITY
3.1 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event
3.1.1 Existing Inundation Risk
Land levels across the property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue vary between approximately
+1.94 metres AHD at the front street boundary and +3.04 metres AHD at the rear property
boundary nearest Westernport Bay.
As noted previously in Table 1, the predicted ocean water level currently associated with a 100
year return period event is +2.12 metres AHD along local foreshores. This ocean level is some
0.18 metres above the lowest land level in the south-west corner of the property at No. 39
Silverleaves Avenue. This suggests that whilst the high dune system between the property
and the Bay will prevent the direct access of storm tide reaching the property. However,
Melbourne Water nominate that the 100 year ARI flood event has a level +2.7 metres AHD,
which would inundate up to 50% of the land.
Whilst the 100 year ARI storm tide level is below the proposed Finished Floor Level of +2.94
metres AHD, the Melbourne Water requirement is for a 600 mm freeboard. The proposed
finished floor level would need to be raised to +3.3 metres AHD for present day sea levels and
to allow for a 100 year return period flood event.
3.1.2 Existing Coastal Erosion Risk
The property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue is located some 78 metres inland and will
therefore be well beyond the effects of any storm erosion.
3.2 Mitigation
The finished floor level of the proposed development of the property at No. 39 Silverleaves
Avenue would need to be raised to +3.3 metres AHD to accommodate the effects of a 100
year return period flood event occurring under the present-day climate scenario.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 10
4 VULNERABILITY OVER A PLANNING PERIOD TO 2040
4.1 Storm Parameters
The CSIRO study of future climate change effects in Westernport Bay (McInnes et al, 2005)
predicts an increase in the strength of winds during storms by the year 2040. This increased
“storminess” in conjunction with predicted sea level rise at 2040 results in an estimated 100
year return period storm tide level of +2.45 metres AHD - refer to Table 1.
However, Melbourne Water nominate that the 100 year ARI flood event has a level +2.9
metres AHD, which would inundate up to 70% of the land.
4.2 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event
4.2.1 Inundation Risk in 2040
As stated previously, land levels on the property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue vary between
approximately +1.94 metres AHD at the front street boundary and +3.04 metres AHD at the
rear property boundary nearest the Bay.
Since the predicted ocean water level in 2040 as a consequence of a 100 year return period
event occurring at that time is +2.45 metres AHD, inundation up to 51cm is expected at the
front of the property due to storm tide. The predicted 100 year ARI flood level by Melbourne
Water is 2.9 metres AHD.
Whilst the 100 year ARI flood level is below the proposed Finished Floor Level of +2.94 metres
AHD, the Melbourne Water requirement is for a 600 mm freeboard. The proposed finished
floor level would need to be raised to +3.5 metres AHD for the 2040 sea level and to allow for a
100 year return period flood event.
4.2.2 Coastal Erosion Risk in 2040
As stated in Section 2.3, the 78 metre setback from the Bay at this location provides a wide
physical buffer that can adequately accommodate these predicted shoreline responses.
Consequently coastal processes will not adversely affect the property at No. 39 Silverleaves
Avenue in future years to 2040.
4.3 Mitigation
The finished floor level of the proposed development of the property at No. 39 Silverleaves
Avenue would need to be raised to +3.5 metres AHD to accommodate the effects of a 100
year return period flood event occurring under the 2040 climate scenario.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 11
5 VULNERABILITY OVER A PLANNING PERIOD TO 2100
5.1 Storm Parameters
The Victorian Coastal Strategy requires consideration of a 0.8 metre rise in sea levels by the
year 2100. The CSIRO study of future climate change effects (McInnes et al, 2005) predicts
an increase in the strength of winds during storms by the year 2100. This increased
“storminess” in conjunction with 0.8 metre sea level rise results in a 100 year return period
storm tide level of +3.05 metres AHD by the year 2100 - refer to Table 1.
However, Melbourne Water nominate that the 100 year ARI flood event has a level +3.5
metres AHD, which would inundate all of the land.
5.2 Vulnerability to the 100 year Return Period Storm Event
5.2.1 Inundation Risk in 2100
As stated previously, land levels on the property at No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue vary between
approximately +1.94 metres AHD at the front street boundary and +3.04 metres AHD at the
rear property boundary nearest the Bay.
Since the predicted ocean water level in 2100 as a consequence of a 100 year return period
event occurring at that time is +3.05 metres AHD, inundation is expected across most of the
property - to a maximum depth of around 111cm at the front of the property. The predicted
100 year ARI flood level by Melbourne Water is 3.5 metres AHD which would inundate the
whole site.
The 100 year ARI flood level is above the proposed Finished Floor Level of +2.94 metres AHD.
Allowing for the Melbourne Water requirement for a 600 mm freeboard the proposed finished
floor level would need to be raised to +4.1 metres AHD for the 2100 sea level and to allow for a
100 year return period flood event.
5.2.2 Coastal Erosion Risk in 2100
As stated in Section 2.3, the approximately 78 metre setback from the Bay at this location
provides a wide, high physical buffer that can adequately accommodate these predicted
shoreline responses. Consequently coastal processes will not adversely affect the property at
No. 39 Silverleaves Avenue in future years to 2100.
5.3 Mitigation
The finished floor level of the proposed development of the property at No. 39 Silverleaves
Avenue would need to be raised to +4.1 metres AHD to accommodate the effects of a 100
year return period flood event occurring under the 2100 climate scenario.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 12
It is noted that the dune seaward of 39 Silverleaves is significantly higher than the flood level
and during such a flood event with 2100 water levels, there would be a safe exit from the
property via the coastal dunes.
Coastal Hazard Vulnerability Assessment – Rev C Page | 13
6 REFERENCES
Department of Sustainability and Environment (2012). “Victorian Coastal Hazard Guide”.
Published by Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment. June 2012.
ISBN 978-1-74287-401-2 (print). ISBN 978-1-74287-402-9 (online).
http://www.climatechange.vic.gov.au/adapting-to-climate-change/future-coasts/victorian-coastal-
hazard-guide.
McInnes, K. L.; Macadam, I.; Hubbert, G. D.; Abbs, D. J.; Bathols, J. M. (2005). “Climate
change in Eastern Victoria: Stage 2 report: the effect of climate change on storm surges: a
project undertaken for the Gippsland Coastal Board.”. Prepared for the Gippsland Coastal
Board. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research. June 2005. procite:070d5e68-da36-
4425-8737-76191b418452
Melbourne Water (2012). “Planning for sea level rise - Assessing development in areas prone
to tidal inundation from sea level rise in the Port Phillip and Westernport Region”. Published
by Melbourne Water. June 2010. ISBN 978-1-921603-62-4 (Print) 978-1-921603-63-1 (Web). http://www.dpcd.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/111950/Melbourne-Water-Planning-for-sea-
level-rise-guidelines.pdf.
Victorian Government (2008). “Victorian Coastal Strategy 2008”. Published by the Victorian
Coastal Council. ISBN 978-1-74208-697-2 (print) ISBN 978-1-74208-698-9 (pdf).
ISBN 978-1-74208-698-9 (PDF)