nitrous oxide emissions from soils receiving a combination of dairy manure and mineral nitrogen...
TRANSCRIPT
Nitrous Oxide Emissions Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Soils Receiving a from Soils Receiving a
Combination of Dairy Manure Combination of Dairy Manure and Mineral Nitrogen and Mineral Nitrogen
FertilizerFertilizerCurtis Dell
USDA-ARS-PSWMRUUniversity Park, PA
Nitrous Oxide (NNitrous Oxide (N22O)O)
Approximately 300 times more effective than CO2 as a greenhouse gas
Agriculture is a significant contributor
By-product of both nitrification (aerobic) and denitrification (anaerobic)
Denitrification generally believed to be largest N2O source in soils, but rates vary greatly depending on soil aeration
Manure Management In NE Manure Management In NE USUS
Large number of dairy, poultry, and swine facilities
Limited land base for manure application
Water quality problems resulting from excess P accumulations in soil
Nutrient management planning required in several NE/Chesapeake Bay states
Nutrient Management In NE Nutrient Management In NE USUS
Manure application in excess of plant P requirement discouraged/prohibited in many locations
A larger land base for spreading or costly waste treatment required
Combinations of manure and mineral N fertilizers used more frequently
Manure Applications and NManure Applications and N22O O
EmissionsEmissions Greater potential for N2O production
when manure is fertilizer source because of addition of organic C • Energy source for denitrifying bacteria• Stimulates activity by general microbial
population, depleting O2 supply
Combinations of organic and mineral N fertilizers may have even greater potential for emissions • Organic C from manure and readily
available N from mineral fertilizer
ObjectivesObjectives
Determine if N2O emissions from a corn
field differ when N fertilizer is applied
as NH4NO3, dairy manure,or a
combination of the two.
MethodsMethods
N Source TreatmentsN Source Treatments
N Source TreatmentsN Source TreatmentsAll mineral fertilizer75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: preplant-
incorporated75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: side dress, surface
60 kg ha-1 mineral P: preplant, incorporated
N Source TreatmentsN Source TreatmentsAll mineral fertilizer75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: preplant-
incorporated75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: side dress, surface
60 kg ha-1 mineral P: preplant, incorporated
P-based manure (31 Mg ha-1)
~75 kg ha-1 N as manure: preplant, incorporated
75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: side dress, surface
~60 kg ha-1 P as manure: preplant, incorporated
N Source TreatmentsN Source TreatmentsAll mineral fertilizer75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: preplant-incorporated
75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: side dress, surface60 kg ha-1 mineral P: preplant, incorporated
P-based manure (31 Mg ha-1)
~75 kg ha-1 N as manure: preplant, incorporated75 kg ha-1 N as NH4NO3: side dress, surface~60 kg ha-1 P as manure: preplant, incorporated
N-based manure (62 Mg ha-1)
~150 kg ha-1 N as manure: preplant, incorporated~120 kg ha-1 P as manure: preplant, incorporated
Vented chambersVented chambers
Sampling and AnalysisSampling and Analysis
Additional MeasurementsAdditional Measurements
Gravimetric soil water content
Soil inorganic N (2004 only)
ResultsResults
5/1/03 6/1/03 7/1/03 8/1/03 9/1/03 10/1/03 11/1/03
Dai
ly r
ain
fall
(mm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
5/1/2004 6/1/2004 7/1/2004 8/1/2004 9/1/2004 10/1/2004 11/1/2004
Dai
ly r
ain
fall
(mm
)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2003
2004
RainfallRainfall
Source: Penn State Univ. Dept. of Meteorology
Soil Water ContentSoil Water Content
6/1/03 7/1/03 8/1/03 9/1/03 10/1/03
So
il w
ater
co
nte
nt
(g H
2O g-1
)
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
Mineral fertilizerP-based manaure plus side-dress NN-based manure
5/1/04 6/1/04 7/1/04 8/1/04 9/1/04
Soil Nitrate: 2004Soil Nitrate: 2004
5/1/04 6/1/04 7/1/04 8/1/04
So
il n
itra
te (
mg
N k
g-1)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Mineral fertilizerP-based manure N-based manure
Manure/fertilizer Side-dress N
NN22O Emissions: 2003O Emissions: 2003
6/1/03 7/1/03 8/1/03 9/1/03 10/1/03
N2O
em
issi
on
s (g
N h
a-1 d
-1)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Mineral fertilizerP-based manureN-based manure
Manure /fertilizer
Side-dress N
*
*
NN22O Emissions: 2004O Emissions: 2004
5/1/04 6/1/04 7/1/04 8/1/04 9/1/04
N2
O e
mis
sio
ns
(g
N h
a-1
d-1
)
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
Mineral fertilizerP-based manureN-based manure
Manure /fertilizer Side-dress N
**
*
**
Estimated Seasonal NEstimated Seasonal N22O O EmissionsEmissions
kg N ha-1 % of total applied N
% of available N1
2003 Mineral fertilizer 8.6 3.6 a 6.0 2.5 6.0 2.5 P- Based manure 7.21.9 a 2.30.6 5.01.3 N- Based manure 8.11.7 a 1.60.3 4.7 1.0
2004
Mineral fertilizer 1.91.1a 1.30.8 1.30.8 P- Based manure 4.31.9 b 1.70.7 3.01.3 N- Based manure 3.91.2 b 1.00.3 2.70.8
1Assuming 35% of total N is available during the year of application
ConclusionsConclusions
N2O emissions are potentially greater when all or part of the N was supplied by manure
Application of only manure or a combination of manure and mineral N resulted in similar emissions
ImplicationsImplications
Utilization of manures as a fertilizer source must be a accounted for in the estimation of N2O emissions from cropping systems.
Application of manure to a larger land base, even at lower rates, has the potential to increase overall annual N2O emissions.
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
• Bill Priddy, MaryKay Krasinski, Dianna Sturrock, and Jessica Agnew for all their efforts in the field and lab