nircam dhas and array characterization john stansberry uofa nircam team

19
NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Upload: archibald-wilson

Post on 02-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization

John Stansberry

UofA NIRCam team

Page 2: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Pipeline/DHAS Implementation

• NCDHAS Written in C++ for speed (fitsio libraries required)

80 MB per frame/group if running all 10 arrays FITS extensions (slope & uncertainty; intercept & uncertainty; …)

• Modular design (implemented modules)

1. Reference pixel subtraction

2. Dark (ramp?) subtraction (don’t have satisfactory cal frame yet)

3. “CR” detection/removal

4. Linearity correction, saturation detection

5. Slope & intercept determination Ramp fitting Slope from frame0

6. Flat-fielding

7. IPC/Hysteresis? At what stage in this flow?

Page 3: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Other Data Processing and Analysis Tools

• FITS packer for Teledyne data (UA data OK as is) All frames/groups placed into a data cube Much simpler directory structure, I/O Data organization vastly simpler with this format

• Data Visualization IDL GUI (ncview) based on ATV Pan, zoom, scale Pixel/region values, slope or DN images, ramps/fits Currently limited to single-SCA support

• Accumulator Converts “raw” data to flight-like multiaccum/grouped

data

Page 4: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

NCView

Latent-decay exposure

Functionality: DN images; Pixel rampsTo Do: other images, region statistics,…

Page 5: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Array Characterization at UofA• UofA array testing facilities

Leach controller (4 SCAs 25-frame exposures; 1 SCA 90-frames) Linux workstation, scripting capability, telemetry logging Luppino dewar, 1-4 SCAs or SW FPA, LED sources (diffuse)

• Performance/Sensitivity Readnoise, dark-current, QE, gain, operability from Teledyne All but QE confirmed post-delivery at UofA

• “Features” Dark-current settling (problem resolved) Latent images Nonlinear response Cosmic-ray like: RTN / popcorn; snowballs 1st Frame effect Reference pixel ramps

Page 6: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Dark Current “Settling”

• Early dark measurements at UofA were not very stable Decreasing dark current vs.

time Spatial pattern of dark also

time dependent

Page 7: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Dark Current “Settling”

• Effect may be due to incorrect array voltages after data collection system crashes As if the arrays were flooded with charge Decay time-constant much longer than for latent images, though.

• Also mitigated by double-resets, and adequate settling time after system is brought up• Unlikely to be an issue when running w/ ASICs (to be confirmed soon)

Latent image patternHigh dark-current pattern

Page 8: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Latent Images

• Latents unlikely to be a big problem

• Data collected Saturating flood illumination

(~200k e-) in 4 frames

• Latent strength, decay <0.05% @ 100 seconds <~ 0.5% @ 10 seconds

• To Do Range of brightnesses,

temperatures Higher time resolution to

measure the decay

C042 32K Latent

-5.000

0.000

5.000

10.000

15.000

20.000

25.000

30.000

0 2 4 6 8 10

Ramp No.

AD

Us

Run 1 Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 0.05 Percent

200sec data ramps

0.05% level

Page 9: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Nonlinear Response

• Ramps are nonlinear ~10% effect near saturation

• Correction strategy Extensive data sets being

collected 2nd O polynomial works well

• Correction verification may only be possible on-orbit Calibration observations over

wide range of source brightness

No absolutely calibrated sources available for I&T

Run 11 Linearity

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

0 100 200 300 400 500

Time (sec)A

DU

s -

C042 Patch C042 Patch Lin Fit

C042 Patch 2nd O Fit C042 patch High linearity

Page 10: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Popcorn / Random Telegraph Noise

• 63 900sec dark exposures, 10.6sec sample time, part C048 <1% of pixels show event in a 1000 second ramp Location of single events depends strongly on output amp. Few 100 DN amplitude

Single event per ramp Multiple Events

0.29% 0.095% 1.2% .002%

Page 11: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Fitted function

Reference level(from top RP’s)

First-Frame Effect

• NIRCam only issue (?) Elevated DN in 1st frame

after reset Decays w/ ~ 30usec Affects ~20 detector

rows @ edge w/ outputs RPs and active pixels

Dark-like correction Impact on grouped data

Group-1 includes 1st frame

NIRCam also gets 1st frame separately

Page 12: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Correction of First-Frame Effect

Page 13: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Reference Pixel Ramps

• Reference Pixels “integrate” Darks: RP’s show no measurable slope Strong illumination: RP’s show distinct slopes

Appears to be coupling in the multiplexer Do the active pixels also show this effect? Testing…

C035 Active Pixels

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

0 50 100 150 200 250

Time (sec)

AD

Us -

Stripe 1 Stripe 2 Stripe3 Stripe4

C035 Top Ref pixels

5000

5500

6000

6500

7000

7500

8000

0 50 100 150 200 250

Time (Sec)

AD

Us

-

R2045 S1 R2045 S2 R0245 S3 R2045 S4

R2046 S1 R2046 S2 R2046 S3 R2046 S4

R2047 S1 R2047 S2 R2047 S3 R2047 S4

R2048 S1 R2048 S2 R2048 S3 R2048 S4

Page 14: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Backup

Page 15: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Summary of Flight Candidate Properties

SCA Dark

Current Read NoiseCDS Read

Noise [email protected] [email protected] Operabilitye/sec e e

Req 0.01 9 21 0.7 0.8 0.96FM FPA #1 C038 0.001 8.3 18.3 0.69 0.99 0.99

C073 0.001 6.7 13.7 N/A 0.98 0.99C043 <0.001 6.5 17.0 0.83 0.99 0.99C045 <0.001 7.4 20.1 0.90 0.84 0.99

FM FPA#2 C044 0.0001 7.5 18.8 0.91 0.91 0.99C063 <0.001 7.6** 16.7** 0.69 0.96 0.985C072 0.01* 6.9 17.8 N/A 0.8 0.988C074 0.01* 8.2 16.3 N/A 0.81 0.986

Spare C049 <0.001 7.0 18.6 0.87 1.00 0.95C064 <0.001 7.3** 16.5** 0.75 0.92 0.986C067 0.001 7.2 19.4 N/A 0.91 0.98C041 <0.001 7.9 15.3 0.49 0.79 0.98

**Based on Az analysis of TIS data

-- : data not yet received from TIS

N/A : removed short wavelength tests

: Formally misses SCA-level req but top-level sensitivity spec not violated (assuming no other problems)

Page 16: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Flight FPA #1 Candidate Arrangement

C073 C038

C043 C045

Note that SCAs can only be positioned with their connectors along the top or bottom edges of the FPA.

Illuminated Dark

Page 17: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Dark Current “Settling”

High dark current condition Low dark current condition

Page 18: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Qualification SW FPA

In the clean room handling jig. In the metrology dewar. In the GL performance dewar.

On the way to San Jose (eg. Vibe)

Metrology and performance measurements have been repeated post-vibe: No changes were seen relative to pre-vibe!

Qual FPA has been taken to LM ATC for use in FPE check out (w/ ASICs).

After FPE check out, the qual FPA will return to Arizona for use if anomalies or detector issues need investigation.

Page 19: NIRCam DHAS and Array Characterization John Stansberry UofA NIRCam team

Flight FPA #2 Candidate Arrangement

C063 C074

C044 C072

Illuminated Dark