ninth international phoenics user conference september 23 – 27 2002, moscow, russia
DESCRIPTION
National Tunisian Engineering School (ENIT). L A M S I N. Two-dimensional free surface modelling for a non-dimensional Dam-Break problem. M. Ben Haj , Z. Hafsia , H. Chaker and K. Maalel. Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia
Two-dimensional free surface modelling for a non-dimensional Dam-Break
problem M. Ben Haj , Z. Hafsia , H. Chaker and K. Maalel
National Tunisian Engineering School (ENIT)
LAMSIN
![Page 2: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
0
0
Dam-site
Length (m)
Hei
ght (
m)
Initial state
He i
g ht (
m)
Length (m)
t
t
Dam break profile at t = 20 s
Problem position
![Page 3: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
The mathematical model will need to:
• Locate the unknown inter-fluid boundaries;• Satisfy the field equations governing conservation of mass, momentum;• Be consistent with the boundary conditions.
Free Surface Equation
: High of a point from the free surface to a reference plan
: High of a point to the same reference plan
0),( sztxzF
),( txzsz
![Page 4: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The fluid flow equations
South (S) North (N)
High (H)
Low (L)
P
P = Center of the cell
z
y
Control volume
h
n
l
s
PTLHSN
TTLLHHSSNNP aaaaaa
Saaaaa
In discrete and implicit formulation:
S ) . ( μ ) u . (ρ ρt
the continuity equation ; 1 u the momentum equation
![Page 5: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The free surface model
)( ρ ) (1ρ ρ LG
)( ) (1 LG } single-phase treatments
0 1 gas cell ; liquid cell
Boundary conditions
surface free at the aPP bottom at the n.u un
![Page 6: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
• The Scalar Equation Method (SEM)
0 ) u . (Φ. tΦ
Governing Equation:
Van Leer discretisation of the scalar-convection terms:
ni(U)
Faces
i P
iinin
PnP ΦV
ΔtAn . u - Φ Φ
1
11
0 for 2)/ ( . )/( nnPPn dtudydyd
0 for 2)/ ( . )/( nnNNn dtudydyd
CFL condition: dt = min (dy/v, dz/w )
![Page 7: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
S NP
P = Center of the cell
z
yNorth face
ns
0 n
![Page 8: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
z7
6
5
1
2
3
4
Definition of variables for HOL
MT - ML
ML
TL
T
V M
LMΦ
• The Height of Liquid Method (HOL)
![Page 9: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
y = 0
The problem position
300 m 300 m
10 m U1 = 0
• NY1 = 60 for SEM and NY1 = 300 for HOL (upstream);
• NY2 = 60 for SEM and NY2 = 300 for HOL (downstream);
• NZ1 = 20 for both SEM and HOL;
• The computations are performed for a time of 15 s and with a time step ∆t = 0,2 s for SEM and ∆t = 0,04 s for HOL.
![Page 10: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
1 * if 1 1
yhh
2 * 1 if *2 91 )( 2
1 yyh
h
2 * if 0 1
yhh
1ghy *
ty
Non-dimensional analytical solution of Dam-Break Problem
{Where and h1 is the initial upstream flow depth in the reservoir.
y* = -1 y* = 2y* = 0
1 1h
h
![Page 11: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Non-dimensional Free Surface Profiles for SEM method
![Page 12: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Non-dimensional Free Surface Profiles for HOL method
![Page 13: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Non-dimensional Free Surface Profiles: a) For SEM method b) For HOL method
a) b)
![Page 14: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Non-dimensional Front Location for SEM method
![Page 15: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Non-dimensional Front Location for HOL method
![Page 16: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Non-dimensional Front Location: a) For SEM method b) For HOL method
a) b)
![Page 17: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Time Variation of Flow Depth at Dam Site for SEM method
![Page 18: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Time Variation of Flow Depth at Dam Site for HOL method
![Page 19: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Time Variation of Flow Depth at Dam Site: a) For SEM method b) For HOL method
a) b)
![Page 20: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Pressure History at Dam Site for SEM method
![Page 21: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Pressure History at Dam Site for HOL method
![Page 22: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
a) b)
Pressure History at Dam Site a) For SEM method b) For HOL method
![Page 23: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Evolution of Pressure Distribution at Dam Site for SEM method
![Page 24: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Evolution of Pressure Distribution at Dam Site for HOL method
![Page 25: Ninth International PHOENICS User Conference September 23 – 27 2002, Moscow, Russia](https://reader035.vdocuments.site/reader035/viewer/2022081422/56815d74550346895dcb816d/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
1. The location of the tip in the cases of SEM and HOL is under predicted by the analytical model, as compared with the numerical result.
2. The two dimensional effects reduce the rate at which the tip advances on a dry bed for SEM and HOL which is smaller than a value of 2 as suggested by Ritter 1892. These results indicate a significant long-term effect of non-hydrostatic pressure distribution, in the case of dry-bed condition.
3. Ritter’s (1892) solution, which use the hydrostatic assumption, predict that the flow depth at the dam site attains a constant value of 4/9 instantaneously upon the dam break. However, with the SEM and HOL methods, the flow depth at the dam site takes some times to attain this constant value.
4. In both cases of SEM and HOL, the pressure is not equal but greater than the hydrostatic pressure at the beginning due to the streamline curvature. It eventually approaches the hydrostatic value as time progress.
Some Conclusions