nick partnership delivery

8/9/2019 Nick Partnership Delivery

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/nick-partnership-delivery 1/59

Partnership Delivery for Flood & CoastErosion Schemes

Nick LynessEnvironment Agency Wessex Area Flood & Coast Risk Manager



TOPICS

• Introduction

• W y !artners i"s• EA Role• C allenges and legacy assets• !artners i" A""roac• #and$ic• !ortsmit• W it%y• Cleveleys• um%er

•I"s$ic• 'ridg$ater • Weymout• !oole• #ummary



South West“ !aritime "e#ion$



Preparations for %inter '()*(+



What storms,- nd to ) th Decem.er '(/

- / rd to ) th 0anuary '()- 1 th to 2 th 0anuary '()- ( st Fe.ruary '()- ) th to 3 th Fe.ruary '()- ( th Fe.ruary '()- () th to (1 th Fe.ruary '()- / rd !arch '()4



5yme "e#is 6 The Co..



Waves & Ener#y

(

)anuary & Fe%ruary Wave eig ts* West 'ay +,reen line Average* 'lack line Max-



7urton 7radstoc8



. e Little # i" /t

Fe%ruary #ource ''C

5andslides &"oc8falls 'urton 'radstock

7ournemouth

Portland



Welcome

01

s%ell + th Fe.ruary '()



+#ource ,uardianNe$s"a"er 2 Fe%ruary

. e #torm o5 / t Fe%ruary 6 Wind Force 789 $aves (:/m



STO"! D ! 9EStorm Wave Dama#e



What we manage



Environment #encyNon de"artmental "u%lic %ody* res"onsi%le to ;EFRA 5or<

• Climate c ange mitigation and ada"tation

• #ustaina%le "laces 6 s"atial "lanning and develo"ment

• Flood and Coastal Risk Management +FCRM-

• Fis eries and %iodiversity

• Water and land =uality

• Regulating %usiness 6 e:g: $aste management• Water resource management

• Incident management



Environment #ency and the Coast

DEF"Strate#ic Overvie%Po%ersEvidenceFundin#Statutory Plannin# ConsulteeClimate Chan#e*Sea 5evel7athin# %aters: pollution:etc



!any CommunitiesDependant onE;istin#Infrastructure



5e#acyssets



The Scale of the pro.lem444

In 3101 491*111 "ro"erties at #igni5icant risk'y 31>/ an additional >/1*111 $ill %e at risk i5investment levels maintained in cas terms:.o maintain num%ers at risk at 3101 level*investment $ill need to dou%le to ?0141 million"lus in5lation %y 31>/ +71@ increase on 3101-

'ut::: Not all o5 t at as to %e 5unded %yCentral ,overnment



Investment pro#ramme '(+- ' (



Partnership Fundin#

istorically Winner .akes AllIncreasing ;emandLimited FundingEncourage innovation!rivate "artici"ationIntegrated #olutionsel" t ose most vulnera%le

! r o

A e c t s a

% o v e

t e

l i n e

! r o

A e c

t s

% e

l o $

t e

l i n e

011@ grant

some grant

011@ grant

no grant

!asta""roac es

!artners i"Funding



Sand%ich

To%n Enterprise <one



Sand%ich =ital Statistics

Will cost ?3>m B ?>m li5etime maintenanceFCRM economic %ene5its ?334m!rotects 472 omes* 91 %usinesses?03:7m FCRM ,iA?2:/m !5i er ?/m Dent County Council;eal includes maintenance "ayments



Portsmouth> strate#ic approach

5o%er contri.ution need ?i#her contri.ution need



Portsmouth@uantifyin# the fundin# shortfall



Cleveleys

7111 "ro"erties"rotected?31 million;e5ra8Wyrecouncil8Euro"eanregional ;evelo"ment

Fund +ER;F- 5unding



Whit.y ?ar.our Piers

0/9 "ro"erties"rotected +5lood-274 "ro"oerties"rotected +erosion-?7:/ million sc eme$it ?4:3 million

5unding 5rom#car%oroug 'C



9ro%th Deal - economic development throu#hinvestment in FC"!

>2



Hope we can show as an example to the rest of the country how we canimprove the speed of planning without compromising our statutoryobligations Lord askins* LE! C air:



I"s$ic .idal 'arrier 09(1s 0/km 5lood de5ence 0 in 31 #G!

Ne$ 'arrier $ill "rovide 0 in >11 #G!

0*217 ouses & 433 %usinesses at risk

#c eme cost ?/7:/m

F;,IA ?31:3m Local Levy ?0:3mRest ?>(:0m Regional ,ro$t * LE!* I'C* !rivate

4*111 ne$ o%s and 01 a 5or develo"ment



'ridg$ater< Case#tudy



!lanned ,ro$t and ur%an regeneration in 'ridg$ater re=uired a strategicrat er t an a "iecemeal a""roac to 5lood risk:

!re5erred 5lood risk solution is a #urge 'arrier kno$n as H. e !arrett'arrier estimated cost ?3/m: Identi5ied in Lo$er !arrett and .one 5loodRisk Management #trategy:

Need 5or "olicy a""roac to deal $it !!#3/ re=uirements 5or ne$develo"ment to %e sa5e 5or its li5etime taking climate c ange into account

;ra5t #u""lementary !lanning ;ocument +#!;- $as com"leted in >mont s 6 EA8#;C: 6 delivers a Hroo5 tax H on all ne$ develo"ment

In Excess o5 ?>million already collected and eld %y #;C

The Plannin# 7ac8#round



Illustrative of proposed "iver Parrett Tidal Sur#e 7arrier 6 9atesClosed



Weston =illa#es 6 Ar.an E;tension

Nort #omerset Council identi5ied as 3 nd ig est 5lood riskin country:!artner $it N#C since 3112 to develo" t e WestonJision: Integrated "lan 5or 5lood risk management*em"loyment* ousing* regeneration and tourism#ea ;e5ences and #ea5ront En ancements com"leted3101:. e Weston Jillages ur%an extension $ill include /*/11ne$ omes and at least >(:( a o5 em"loyment landExtensive 5lood risk to existing "ro"erties and WestonJillages addressed t roug com"re ensive ?01million5lood management solutions to t e K" ill ,reat R yne &River 'an$ell:

• 5o% Standard of Flood Defence



• Decline in pu.lic realm• Fe% Buality hotels• Decline in tourism num.ers• Poor pu.lic ima#e



Defra 6 the %ider pictureig "riority %ut little 5unding nationallyIntegrated %id "ro"osal 6 linked to 5uture regeneration

demonstrates a oined u" a""roac 5rom government %yallo$ing t e Council to make use o5 regeneration 5unds$ ic mig t ot er$ise %e lost



Seafront Enhancements



Economic impacts

.ourism generates 311m8yr "lus(*111*111 visitors in 3101Increased s"end8visitor 5rom ?40:34 in 311( to?/(:97 in 3100



. e "ro"osed 5lood de5ence sc eme does not meet national eligi%ility criteria 5or;e5ra ,rant in Aid 5unding

. is means t at in t e s ort term* develo"ment $ill %e constrained +due to 5lood risk- and in t e longer term t e to$n $ill su55er more 5re=uent direct

economic* social and environmental 5looding im"acts



The Opportunity…

A " ased a""roac

& An agreed mec anism5or contri%utions



vaila.le Fundin#

F;,iA

LA Contri%utions !olicy8CIL

Local Levy

,ov t 5unding +regeneration8artetc-

!rivate 5unding



The 5ocal Plannin# 7ac8#round

Strategic flood defence solution required ifsignificant planned growth at Weymouth is to beaccommodated, given extent of flood risk.Preferred solution is:

• eplacement of quayside defences• Wave return wall and cut!off to "splanade• #idal surge barrier to Weymouth $arbour • "stimated cost %&& million

'elivered through SP', but will be superseded by(ommunity )nfrastructure *evy +()* - /0

Central !oole &



am$ort y

Maintain rockrevetment

Raise existing 5lood$all in medium term

Ne$ =uay $all and de5ence

Ne$ set %ack $alland raised de5ence

Maintainexisting

Maintain existing de5ence*raise in long term

"ecommendation

Short Term '- 'yrs !edium Term '- +'yrs 5on# Term +'-(''yrsImprove de5ences Improve de5ences: Sustain de5ences

Local im"rovements * some viaregeneration

#electively re"lace andim"rove de5ences asre=uired

Maintain de5encesagainst sea level rise



Dealin# %ith "esidual Flood "is8Locating ig ly & more vulnera%le uses suc as residential on "arts o5t e site at less risk o5 5looding

Ksing ground 5loors o5 %uildings 5or less vulnera%le and $atercom"ati%le uses i:e: commercial develo"ment* non residentialinstitutions* marinas* amenity o"en s"ace* nature conservation* car"arking

Raising 5loor levels $ ere a""ro"riate in design terms & taking intoaccount access considerations

Ksing 5lood resilient construction met ods suc as 6 $ater resistantmaterials 5or 5loors* $alls & 5ixtures* siting electrical controls* ca%les

etc a%ove 5lood level:

A to$n centre 5lood $arning & evacuation "lan



Flood Risk Management #trategy

• In5rastructure delivery t roug develo"ment and

regeneration•

Community In5rastructure Levy



Conundrum*Opportunity,

Investment in Flood ;e5ence in5rastructuresigni5icantly %oosts con5idence and in$ardinvestment

Average ratio o5 ?7 %ene5it 5or every ?0invested



1ake sustainable development easier

G55er oint Client Relations i" Manager +CRM- coordinator and Hena%ler *Res"ond "rom"tly & collectively to investorsre=uests 5or early engagement

#et out ex"ectations* standards andre=uirements early* including t e in5ormationneeded to determine "ermits and licenses:Meet statutory res"onse times: W ere t is isnot "ossi%le* let #tatutory Agency and Local

Aut ority CRMs kno$ $it in ( $orking days:



5essons 5earned;evelo"ing long term relations i"s takes time & e55ort,et in earlyWe ave to Hcome to t e ta%le $it somet ing to o55er;i55erent organi ations ave di55erent timelines* "rioritiesand drivers

Flexi%ility and o"enness are 5undamental.aking and s aring measured 5inancial risks. e overriding control on t is engagement model isdevelopment via.ility 6 i:e t e si e o5 t e Hcake & canonly %e cut so many $ays

!artners i" $orking is all a%out com"romise 6understanding and $orking $it t e agenda o5 ot ersKnderstand and %rigade 5uture 5unding ga"s

nick partnership delivery

Documents