ni executive budget 2010 briefing for cal committee
TRANSCRIPT
NI Executive Budget 2010
BRIEFING FOR CAL
COMMITTEE
Outline
UK background and context
The NI context
DCAL
UK background
Pattern of spending reviews UK borrowing Trends in public spending Public expenditure projections
National Spending Review Coverage
99/00
00/01
01/02
02/03
03/04
04/05
05/06
06/07
07/08
08/09
09/10
10/11
11/12
12/13
13/14
14/15
1998 CSR
SR 2000
SR 2002
SR 2004
2007 CSR
SR 2010
UK Borrowing has reached unsustainable level.
34.0
36.0
38.0
40.0
42.0
44.0
46.0
48.0
50.020
00-0
1
2001
-02
2002
-03
2003
-04
2004
-05
2005
-06
2006
-07
2007
-08
2008
-09
2009
-10
2010
-11
2011
-12
2012
-13
2013
-14
2014
-15
2015
-16
% o
f GD
P
Receipts
Expenditure
Significant reduction in UK public spending
Source: OBR Budget Forecast June 2010 – Table C5, Table C13 and Table C16
-3.0%
-2.0%
-1.0%
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
1991-9
2
1992-9
3
1993-9
4
1994-9
5
1995-9
6
1996-9
7
1997-9
8
1998-9
9
1999-0
0
2000-0
1
2001-0
2
2002-0
3
2003-0
4
2004-0
5
2005-0
6
2006-0
7
2007-0
8
2008-0
9
2009-1
0
2010-1
1
2011-1
2
2012-1
3
2013-1
4
2014-1
5
2015-1
6
% G
row
th
30
32
34
36
38
40
42
44
46
48
% o
f G
DP
% Growth In TME
TME % of GDP
UK PE Projections - Resource
180.0
200.0
220.0
240.0
260.0
280.0
300.0
320.0
340.0
360.0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Source: HM Treasury
£ b
illio
n
Cash
Real
UK PE Projections - Capital
10.0
15.0
20.0
25.0
30.0
35.0
40.0
45.0
50.0
55.0
60.0
2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16
Source: HM Treasury
£ b
illio
n
Cash
Real
Budget 2010 – NI context
How NI is funded Current spending by departments Capital spending by departments Summary of budget position Options for the Executive Current priorities DCAL’s wider contribution Way forward
How NI is funded
HM Treasury, 92.2%
EU Peace, 0.2%
Regional Rates, 5.6%
RRI Borrowing, 2.0%
2010-11 Current Expenditure Spending Plans by Department
DE 21.2%
DEL
DETI
DFPDHSSPS 47.5%
DOE
DRD
DSD DCAL 1%
OtherOFMDFM DARD
Note this excludes the spend on Policing and Justice
2010-11 Capital Investment Spending Plans by Department
DE 10.7%
DEL
DETI
DFP
DHSSPS 12.8%
DRD 35.2%
DSD 17.0%
DOE 11.5%
OFMDFM
Other
DCAL 4%
Note: this excludes the spend on DARD and Policing and Justice
Budget 2010 – Summary Position
Real terms reduction in funding from Treasury.
Inflationary cost pressures offset by: Public Sector Pay Freeze. Lower than expected construction price inflation.
Options for Executive
Increase Income Increase Regional Rate Asset Sales Domestic Water and Sewerage Charges
Additional Savings Reduce Administration Increase Efficiency Prioritise Services
Current Priorities
DCAL Contribution to the Wider Government Agenda
Economy Cultural Tourism Creative Industries
Health Long term impact on
health Ability to combat
preventable conditions
Education STEM Initiatives Creative Learning
Centres
Social Inclusion and EqualityShared futureCommunity cohesion
Way Forward
Identify departmental pressures and bid for resources – End July 2010
Develop Savings Delivery Plans – July to October
Ministerial Bilaterals - August
Outcome of national Spending Review – 22 October
Publish draft Budget & supporting documentation – End of October
Public Consultation – November & December Revised Budget – End of December
DCAL
Spending proposals
Savings allocations
DCAL – spending proposals
Current budget
Inescapable and unavoidable Assessed for alignment with Executive
priorities, impact on PSA indicators, impact on equality, good relations, poverty, social inclusion and sustainable development
DCAL – RESOURCE BIDS
Ulster Scots Academy Electronic Libraries World Police and Fire Games Creative Industries Innovation Fund N/S Language Body Adventure Activities Licensing scheme Equal Pay impact on sponsored bodies Pay and other cost inflation
DCAL – CAPITAL BIDS
Zero based approach
56 bids made, ranked by priority
Total value £485m over 4 years
Resource consequentials also bid for
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
Planning assumptions
Flat cash settlement based on 10/11 Reducing adjustments:
Emergency budget effect on baselines Funding for Executive policy initiatives Unavoidable cost pressures Constraints on access to End Year Flexibility
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
Planning assumptions cont.
• Total savings requirement is pro rated across departments
• Resource bids are met• No contribution from water charging
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
Effect on budgets:
Against an opening baseline of £109.57m –
11/12, a reduction of £5.2m 12/13, a reduction of £4.23m (£9.43m cum) 13/14, a reduction of £4.72m (£14.15m cum) 14/15, a reduction of £4.72m (£18.87 cum)
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
Allocation of savings
Use of approximate pro rating as a first step Differential phasing of budget reductions North South Bodies – need for agreement
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
Effects of proposed savings allocation
Development of savings delivery plans Potential impacts Mitigation of consequences – departure from
pro rating Deliverability
DCAL – SAVINGS EXERCISE
The Committee’s views:
Where should savings be made?