ngr750_410

8/3/2019 ngr750_410

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/ngr750410 1/53

National Guard Regulation 750-410

Maintenance of Supplies and Equipment

Army NationalGuard AviationNondestructiveTesting Program

Departments of the Army and the Air ForceNational Guard BureauArlington, VA 22202-323127 February 2009

UNCLASSIFIED

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


SUMMARY of CHANGE

NGR 750-410Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive Testing Program

27 February 2009

This is a new Army National Guard regulation

o Establishes guidance for executing the Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive TestingProgram.

o Establishes policy and objectives for the Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive TestingProgram (Para 1-4).

o Specifies and defines responsibility for Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive TestingProgram at the National Guard Bureau and Army National Guard Aviation Units and Facilities. (Para1-5 through 1-8).

o Specifies minimum nondestructive training and experience requirements for ARNG aircraftmaintenance related personnel. (Para 3-3 and 3-4).

o Specifies the use of the Training Experience and Certification Tracking System (TEACTS) toadminister and manage the Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive Testing Program [Para 3-5.c. (2)].

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

ii

1-3. Explanation of Abbreviations and Terms

1-4. Policy and Objectives

Section II

Responsibilities

1-5. Director, Army National Guard (DARNG)

1-6. Chief, Aviation and Safety Division (NGB-AVS)

1-7. Chief, Aviation Systems Branch (NGB-AVS-A)

1-8. Program Manager, ARNG Aviation NDT Program

Chapter 2

Program Overview2-1. Applicability

2-2. Common NDT Methods

2-3. Levels of NDT Qualification and Certification (Commander Appointment)

Chapter 3

Qualification Requirements

3-1. General Qualification Requirements

3-2. Specific Qualification Requirements

3-3. Training Requirements

3-4. Experience Requirements

3-5. Commander Certification (Appointment)

Appendices

A. References

B. Training Experience and Certification Tracking System (TEACTS)

C. Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) and Evaluation Process

D. Sample NDT SOP

E. TSQ Checklists

F. Management Control Evaluation Checklist

Table List

3-1. Minimum Formal Training Hours

3-2. Minimum Experience Requirements

C-1. TSQ Currency and Proficiency MaintenanceC-2. TSQ Evaluator Checklist

C-3. Unit Equipment Requirement Checklist

Figure List

2-1. ARNG Aviation NDT Program Overview

Glossary

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

1

Chapter 1

General Provisions

Section I

Introduction

1-1. Purpose

a. This regulation provides the policies and procedures for the establishment, management and operational

maintenance of the ARNG Aviation Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Program.

b. This regulation establishes the minimum requirements for the qualification and certification (Commander

appointment) of ARNG and government aviation maintenance related personnel involved in the application of NDT,

Nondestructive Inspection (NDI), or Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) on ARNG aircraft and aircraft components

IAW AR 750-1, TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-366-23, and applicable aircraft TMs. These requirements include

documented formal training, experience, evaluations, and examinations. For the purposes of this regulation NDT,

NDI, and NDE will be collectively referred to as NDT.

1-2. References

References used in this regulation are found listed in appendix A.

1-3. Explanation of Abbreviations and Terms

Abbreviations and special terms used in this regulation are explained in the glossary.

1-4. Policy and Objectives

a. Improve aviation safety through enhanced NDT training, inspection procedures and equipment use.

b. Increase aircraft readiness rates and operational availability.

c. Increase the probability of detection of faults in aircraft and aircraft components.

d. Decrease supply demands due to replacement of components erroneously identified as having faults.

e. Qualify ARNG personnel utilizing NDT equipment, techniques, procedures and inspections.

f. Qualify, certify (appoint), and maintain a minimum of two NDT trained and task specific qualified (TSQ)

personnel at each ARNG aircraft maintenance location, i.e., Aviation Classification Repair Activity Depot

(AVCRAD), Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF), and Army Aviation Training Site (AATS).

g. Appoint and maintain an appropriate number of TSQ Evaluators to support TSQ evaluation requirements

(approximately 25 TSQ Evaluators – 5 per AVCRAD plus 5 “at large”).

h. Establish each AVCRAD as the NDT and TSQ coordinator for their respective supported States.

Section II

Responsibilities

1-5. Director, Army National Guard (DARNG)

The Director, Army National Guard establishes policy and provides resources necessary to implement and maintain

the program.

1-6. Chief, Aviation and Safety Division (NGB-AVS)

The Chief, Aviation and Safety Division has staff responsibility for monitoring the program and to identify the

resources necessary to effect NDT policy and standards throughout the ARNG aviation community.

1-7. Chief, Aviation Systems Readiness Branch (NGB-AVS-A)The Chief, Aviation Systems Readiness Branch shall:

a. Program, acquire, manage and distribute resources in support of the program.

b. Develop and publish program guidance.

c. Exercise operational control over the program.

d. Provide the personnel and funding resources necessary to manage and maintain the program.

e. Review periodically the program.

f. Establish specific personnel qualification and certification (appointment) goals based on the objectives in

paragraph 1-4.

g. Appoint a Program Manager (PM).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

2

1-8. Program Manager, ARNG Aviation NDT Program (NGB-AVS-A)The Program Manager shall manage the ARNG Aviation NDT Program IAW this regulation.

Chapter 2

Program Overview

2-1. Applicability

a. This regulation applies to all categories of non-mobilized ARNG aviation maintenance related personnel, and

government employees, using NDT methods to process, or evaluate for acceptance, ARNG aircraft systems,

subsystems, or components, or materials, products, subsystems, or components of aircraft systems or subsystems.

b. Aviation maintenance related personnel are individuals who are required to possess aircraft maintenance

skills, knowledge, and abilities in order to perform their duties. Personnel must be qualified in an aviation

maintenance related area in one of the following categories:

(1) Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) in Career Management Field (CMF) 15 – Aviation.

(2) Aviation Branch 15.

(3) Equivalent aviation maintenance related government classification.

c. The NDT PM may add any additional levels of qualification and certification (appointment), that are

appropriate; however, in no manner can any subordinate organization eliminate or reduce the minimum

requirements of this regulation in its qualification and certification (appointment) procedures. Any reference withinthis regulation regarding NGB approval for certifications (appointments), waivers, NDT sources, etc. shall be in

writing from the NDT PM.

2-2. Common NDT Methods a. This regulation contains detailed requirements for the applicable training, experience, and examinations for

the following common NDT methods:

(1) Liquid Penetrant Testing (PT)

(2) Magnetic Particle Testing (MT)

(3) Eddy Current Testing (ET)

(4) Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

(5) Radiography Testing (RT)

b. The requirements for personnel training, experience, and examinations for other NDT methods not listed

above shall be as directed by the NDT PM.

2-3. Levels of NDT Qualification and Certification (Commander Appointment) a. The levels of qualification established by this regulation are:

(1) Trainee

(2) Task Specific Qualification (TSQ)

(3) Level I

(4) Level II

(5) Level III

(6) Instructor

(7) NDT Auditor

(8) TSQ Evaluator

b. The levels of Certification (Commander Appointment) established by this regulation are:

(1) TSQ(2) Level I

(3) Level II

(4) Level III

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

3

Or

Figure 2-1. ARNG Aviation NDT Program Overview

* INITIAL TRAINING

(for each NDT method)

PT = 32 hrs

MT = 32 hrs

ET = 80 hrs

UT = 80 hrs

RT = 80 hrs

* (Meets Level II training

requirement - by method)

(Must pass course

completion exams)

TEACTS DOCUMENTED

EXPERIENCE

(Forms 623 & 1098)

Self-studyAssisted Inspections

TSQ Exams

TSQ Inspections

NDT Workshops

TASK SPECIFIC

QUALIFICATION (TSQ) EXAM

(Prerequisite is 10% of Level I experience -

by NDT method)

PT = 13 hrs

MT = 13 hrsET = 40 hrs

UT = 40 hrs

RT = 40 hrs

(Commander certifies TSQ appointment)

TSQ

MAINTENANCE

(Perform 180 day

currency inspection and

pass annual proficiency

evaluation)

TSQ

MAINTENANCE

(Perform 180 day


pass annual TSQ

proficiency evaluation)

TEACTS DOCUMENTED

EXPERIENCE

(Forms 623 & 1098)Self-study

Assisted Inspections

TSQ Exams

TSQ Inspections

NDT Workshops

TSQ Evaluations (Evaluators)

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of TRAINEE

to LEVEL I(Upon accrual of required

experience hours and pass all

Level I exams)

PT = 130 hrs

MT = 130 hrs

ET = 400 hrs

UT = 400 hrs

RT = 400 hrs

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of LEVEL I to

LEVEL II

(Upon accrual of required experience

hours and pass all Level II exams)

(meets min. Level II training with

additional Level I experience)

PT = 270 hrs

MT = 400 hrs

ET = 1200 hrsUT = 1200 hrs

RT = 1200 hrs

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of TRAINEE to

LEVEL II



(meets min. Level II training &

Trainee experience - without Level I)

Certification)

PT = 400 hrs

MT = 530 hrs

ET = 1600 hrsUT = 1600 hrs

RT = 1600 hrs

NDT Refresher

Workshops &

Site Visits

NDT RefresherWorkshops &

Site Visits

or

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

4

Chapter 3

Qualification Requirements

3-1. General Qualification Requirements

a. Qualification: To qualify as NDT Trainee, TSQ, Level I, Level II, or Level III, in a particular NDT method,

an individual shall meet established MOS qualifications, technical qualifications, and vision prerequisites, as well as

complete sufficient organized training to become proficient with the principles and practices of the applicable NDT

method and techniques. The training shall be conducted in accordance with a detailed course outline approved by a

responsible Level III (an NDT PM approved source). The training shall cover basic principles, products, equipment

operating procedures, techniques, applicable specifications, codes and instructions used by the ARNG aviation

community.

b. Qualification Examinations: The examinations needed to verify the visual acuity and technical qualifications

of NDT personnel being tested shall consist of a visual examination, a general knowledge examination, a specific

knowledge examination and a practical (hands-on) examination. The general and specific knowledge examination

questions shall only be made available to examinees during administration of the qualification examinations. All

examinations given, to include the practical examinations, shall be approved by the PM, or an NDT PM approved

source.

(1) Vision Exam: The Vision examination shall ensure that the individual’s near vision and color perception

meet the requirements specified below. Near vision tests shall be administered annually and color perception tests

shall be administered prior to certification (appointment) or recertification (reappointment). These tests shall be

administered by local qualified personnel.(a) Near Vision Requirements: Pass the near vision test chart (Jaeger #1) at not less than 12 inches, or

equivalent visual examination, as determined by medical personnel. Individual must meet requirements with at least

one eye, either natural or corrected.

(b) Color Perception Requirements: Distinguish and differentiate between the colors used in the method for

which certification (appointment) is sought. Limitations in color perception shall be evaluated and documented by

the responsible Level III, through the individual’s Commander to NDT PM, or an NDT PM approved source, prior

to certification (appointment).

(2) General Knowledge Exam: The general knowledge examination for all levels shall be a closed book

examination consisting of questions that cover the cross-section of the applicable NDT method at the appropriate

level. A minimum of 40 questions shall be used for the general examination at each level. For the Level III, the

general knowledge examination questions will address the general knowledge of other methods as well as the

method for which certification (appointment) is sought. Individuals in possession of a current American Society for

Nondestructive Testing (ASNT) NDT Level III certificate, or equivalent certificate, may be satisfactory evidencethat the general knowledge examination requirement is satisfied.

(3) Specific Knowledge Exam: The specific knowledge examination for all levels shall be a closed book

examination and shall cover the requirements and use of the specifications, codes, equipment, operating procedures,

and test techniques that the individual may use in the performance of their duties. A minimum of 30 questions shall

be used for the specific knowledge examination at each level. The examination will be administered by a Level III,

or an NDT PM approved source.

(4) Practical (hands-on) Exam: The practical examination shall consist of a demonstration of proficiency in

performing tasks that are typical of those to be accomplished in the performance of the individual’s duties. If the

individual is required to process product, as well as interpret the results, proficiency shall be demonstrated using test

samples which may include actual hardware. If the individual does not perform the actual NDT process (such as

generating x-ray images), and is only required to interpret the test results, proficiency may be demonstrated using

processed material (images) for evaluation. Written checklists covering the topics detailed in the sub-paragraphs

below shall be developed by the responsible Level III or NDT PM approved source to ensure adequate coverage andto assist in the administration and grading of the examination. The examination will be administered by a Level III

or NDT PM approved source.

(a) TSQ Practical Exam (TSQ Evaluation): The individual shall demonstrate proficiency by processing and

examining at least one test sample for each technique for which TSQ certification (appointment) is sought. The test

samples shall be representative of the specific product, i.e., aircraft, aircraft component or subcomponent, to be

encountered by the individual in the performance of their duties. The individual shall interpret, evaluate and

document the results of the examination of the test samples. The TSQ Checklist(s) used shall include proficiency in

the use and standardization of equipment and materials, adherence to procedural details, and the accuracy and

completeness of interpretation and evaluations of indications. (See appendix C)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

5

(b) Level I Practical Exam: The individual shall demonstrate proficiency by using the appropriate method to

examine at least one test sample for each technique (example for ET: material sorting and crack detection) for which

certification (appointment) is sought. At least two test samples shall be evaluated for each method. The test

samples shall be representative of the products to be encountered by the individual in the performance of their

duties. The checklist [IAW paragraph 3-1.b. (4)] shall address proficiency in the use of the equipment and

materials, adherence to procedural details and the documentation of the results.

(c) Level II Practical Exam: The individual shall demonstrate proficiency by using the appropriate method

to examine at least one test sample for each technique (example for ET, material sort and crack detection) for which

certification (appointment) is sought. At least two test samples shall be evaluated for each method. The test

samples shall be representative of the products to be encountered by the individual in the performance of their

duties. The individual shall interpret, evaluate and document the results of the examination of the test samples. The

checklist [IAW paragraph 3-1.b. (4)] shall include proficiency in the use of equipment and materials, adherence to

procedural details, and the accuracy and the completeness of interpretation and evaluation of indications.

(d) Level III Practical Exam: The individual shall demonstrate proficiency by preparing an NDT procedure

appropriate to their mission requirements. In the event that the individual has already developed satisfactory

procedures, then it is not necessary to develop another one for the practical examination. Procedures developed for

a previous organization may be used to satisfy this requirement if their adequacy can be verified and documented.

When the individual’s duties will include inspection or evaluation of products, then proficiency in performance of

such tasks shall be demonstrated to the requirements of paragraph 3-1.b. (4) (c). The checklist [IAW paragraph 3-

1.b. (4)] shall address the practical and technical adequacy of the interpretation and evaluation of indications. The

results of the practical examination shall be documented. (See paragraph 3-4.c)c. Administration: A certified Level III in the method for which the examinations are given, or an approved

NDT PM source knowledgeable and familiar with the specifications, standards, codes, techniques and products

associated with the ARNG, shall be responsible for the administration of all qualification examinations. The

administration and grading of those examinations using multiple choice or true/false type questions can be delegated

by the Level III. If an outside agency is used to provide this function, then the PM shall ensure that the individual

who performs the administration of the examinations is fully qualified. In no case can an examination be self-

administered or administered by a subordinate.

d. Grading: The individual seeking certification (appointment) must achieve a minimum grade of 70% on the

general knowledge and specific knowledge qualification examinations. The individual must detect all

discontinuities or conditions specified by the Level III during the practical (hands-on) examination and achieve a

minimum score of 70%. The individual must have an average score (of all three exams) of no less then 80% in

order to be eligible for certification (appointment). All examination scores shall be of equal weight in determining

the average score. Scores for third party exams where grading is a pass/fail, the value of pass used for the averagescore shall be 80%.

e. Re-Examination: Individuals failing any examination, (general, specific or practical) shall receive additional

training from a Level III, or NDT PM approved source, before attempting re-examination of the failed exam. The

additional training shall be documented and shall address those areas found deficient in the individual’s skills or

knowledge. The re-examination shall not utilize the same tests or specimens that were used in the initial

examination.

f. Approval of Instructors: Instructors shall be approved by the Level III, in coordination with the NDT PM or

an NDT PM approved source, and shall meet at least one of the following criteria:

(1) Be certified to Level III in the method for which they will be designated an instructor.

(2) Possess the equivalent of a B.S. in engineering, physical science or technology and have adequate

knowledge in the method for which they will be designated as an instructor.

(3) Possess an associate’s degree in physical science or technology and have a minimum of 2 years

experience, or equivalent, as a Level II in the method for which they will be designated as an instructor.(4) Possess a minimum of 4 years experience as a Level II, or equivalent, in the method for which they will

be designated as an instructor.

g. Approval of NDT Auditors: Personnel performing audits, surveys or assessments shall be approved in

writing by the NDT PM.

Note. Personnel who have successfully completed formal training per table 3-1, and have obtained the necessary

experience hours per table 3-2, will be required to pass the visual, general knowledge, specific knowledge and

Practical (hands-on) examinations prior to being recommended for Commander Certification (Appointment).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

6

3-2. Specific Qualification Requirements

a. Trainee: An NDT Trainee is an individual who is participating in this qualification program for an NDT

method and is not yet certified (appointed). An NDT Trainee shall:

(1) Obtain work experience under the supervision of a Task Specific Qualified individual or certified Level I (on

that specific task), Level II or Level III in the same method. However, as the situation dictates, a trained individual

may accrue hours of experience by performing the tasks as outlined in (2) below, when qualified individuals are

unavailable.

(2) Obtain and document experience while performing calibration checks, practice inspections using test

samples or condemned aircraft components, and continuing education approved by an NDT PM approved source.

(3) Not independently conduct tests or perform any other NDT function. Trainees shall not make, accept, or

reject decisions.

b. Task Specific Qualification (TSQ): Trainees and Level I personnel may be certified (appointed) by their

Commander to perform task specific NDT inspections, after passing a TSQ evaluation administered by an appointed

TSQ Evaluator, and upon the recommendation of the NDT PM or other NDT PM approved source. Commanders,

through their appointed certifier, are responsible to ensure that documentation and records are maintained for all

personnel that are Task Specific Qualified. The minimum hours of training required prior to TSQ evaluation will

not be less than the training hours required for Level II in the appropriate method (See paragraph 3-3, table 3-1).

The minimum hours of experience required prior to TSQ evaluation shall not be less then 10% of the experience

hours required for Level I in the appropriate method (See paragraph 3-4, table 3-2). Personnel undergoing initial

TSQ or TSQ requalification shall reference appendix C for additional requirements. Due to the complexity of the

subject matter and changes in technology, it is highly recommended that TSQ personnel attend refresher trainingwithin 5 years of their initial training anniversary. Individuals who are TSQ certified (appointed) by their

Commander may:

(1) Perform specific NDT inspections on specific materials, parts, part features, or assemblies.

(2) Make accept/reject decisions only on task(s) for which TSQ appointed.

c. Level I: The Level I individual shall:

(1) Have the skills and knowledge to process parts and perform equipment standardization.

(2) Be knowledgeable of any necessary preparation of parts before or after inspection.

(3) Be able to follow procedures in the techniques for which certified.

(4) Receive guidance or supervision from a Level II or III individual when necessary.

d. Level II: The Level II individual shall:

(1) Have the skills and knowledge to set up and standardize equipment, conduct tests, interpret, and evaluate

for acceptance or rejection, and document results in accordance with procedures approved by the NDT PM approved

Level III source.(2) Be thoroughly familiar with the scope and limitations of the method in which they are certified and as

directed, be capable of providing the necessary guidance to Trainees and Level I personnel.

(3) Be familiar with the codes, standards, and other governing documents that control the method as utilized

by the ARNG.

(4) Be capable of developing procedures for approval by a Level III.

(5) When required by aviation safety or maintenance messages, Level II personnel will be Task Specific

Qualified. (Example: UH-60 Planetary Gear Carrier inspection)

e. Level III: The Level III individual shall:

(1) Have the skills and knowledge to interpret codes, standards, and other governing documents that control

the method as utilized by the ARNG aviation community.

(2) Be capable of selecting the method and technique for a specific inspection.

(3) Prepare and verify the adequacy of NDT procedures.

(4) Approve NDT procedures and other NDT related work instructions for technical adequacy in the methodto which they are certified.

(5) Have general knowledge of all other NDT methods utilized by the ARNG aviation community.

(6) Be capable of conducting or directing the training and examination of personnel in the method certified.

(7) Conduct NDT for the acceptance of parts only when a demonstration of proficiency in this capability was

included in the practical examination during certification testing.

f. Instructors: Instructors shall have the skills and knowledge to plan, organize, and present classroom,

laboratory, or on-the-job training programs of instruction, in accordance with approved course outlines.

g. Specialist Personnel [Subject Matter Expert (SME)]: With the exception of specialist personnel, training

shall be presented by an instructor or a Level III qualified to NGR 750-410 requirements. Specialist personnel not

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

7

qualified to NGR 750-410 requirements may be used to provide instruction on highly specialized topics (i.e.,

Radiological Safety Course). Selection of specialist personnel must be approved by the NDT PM, or NDT PM

approved source.

h. NDT Auditor: An NDT Auditor shall have the education, training, skills and knowledge to understand the

processes and procedures utilized in the application of NDT processes. The individual shall be familiar with the

applicable codes, standards, and other governing documents that control the method.

i. TSQ Evaluator: A TSQ Evaluator is an individual appointed by the NDT PM to perform TSQ evaluations.

TSQ Evaluators shall meet the following minimum qualifications:

(1) Successfully complete Level II training.

(2) Accumulate Level I experience hours in a particular method.

(3) Successfully complete TSQ Evaluator training and testing, as approved by the NDT PM.

(4) Receive written appointment from the NDT PM as a TSQ Evaluator.

3-3. Training Requirements

a. Individuals seeking a Commander’s Certification (Appointment) as a Level I or Level II shall complete

sufficient organized training to become proficient with the principles and practices of the applicable test method and

techniques. The training shall be conducted in accordance with a detailed course outline approved by the

responsible Level III, or NDT PM approved source. The training shall cover basic principles, products, equipment

operating procedures, techniques, applicable specifications, codes and instructions used by the ARNG aviation

community.

b. Minimum Required Training Hours: The minimum training hours for Levels I and II are given in table 3-1for the specified NDT methods. The minimum training hours for those methods not covered by table 3-1 shall be as

determined by the responsible Level III, or NDT PM approved source. NGR 750-410 or SNT-TC-1A may be used

as a guideline for those methods not included in paragraph 2-2.a. There are no additional training requirements to

transition from Level II to Level III, nor can an individual have sufficient training to allow certification

(appointment) to Level III without prior certification (appointment) as a Level II or performance equivalent to a

Level II.

c. Previous Training: Previous training shall be documented and reviewed for acceptability by the NDT PM on

a case-by-case basis. For personnel credited with prior NDT training and not Task Specific Qualified or certified

within 12 months of their training, additional NDT training must be completed. Additional NDT training may be

conducted by an NDT PM approved source. The additional NDT training shall cover the following subjects with the

depth of coverage of each subject determined by the Level III or NDT PM approved source responsible for the

program:

(1) Set-up and standardization.(2) Safety.

(3) Operation of applicable test or inspection equipment.

(4) Specific test or inspection procedures.

(5) Interpretation and evaluation of test or inspection results.

(6) Applicable codes, standards and specification.

Note. Individuals who have completed the U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command (TRADOC) NDT

Apprentice course (i.e. ASI N2, military or technician) or MOS 15D Advanced Individual Training (AIT) are

required to obtain the additional hours of formal training to meet the minimum formal training hours per this

regulation, prior to requesting a TSQ evaluation.

Table 3-1 Minimum Formal Training Hours - Level I, Level II, And Level III

Hours

Method Level I Level II1 Level II2 Level III3 Penetrant 16 16 32 N/A

Magnetic particle 16 16 32 N/A

Eddy Current 40 40 80 N/A

Ultrasonic 40 40 80 N/A

Radiography 40 40 80 N/A

Notes:1 Level II, with prior Level I Certification (appointment)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

8

Table 3-1 Minimum Formal Training Hours (Continued)

2 Level II, no prior Level I Certification (appointment)3 Level III, there are no additional formal training requirements

3-4. Experience Requirementsa. Experience: Individuals seeking a Commanders’ Certification (Appointment) as TSQ, Level I, II or III shall

have sufficient practical experience to ensure that they are capable of performing the duties of the level for which

certification (appointment) is sought. The minimum requirements for TSQ, Level I, II and III are in table 3-2.

b. Previous Experience: An individual’s experience with a previous employer may be accepted by NDT PM

only if that experience is documented.

c. Equivalent Experience: For personnel certified under previous revisions of this document or other

qualification/certification programs, the equivalency of their previous experience to the requirements of table 3-2

will be determined and documented by the Level III or NDT PM approved source. Personnel completing TRADOC

NDT Apprentice course (i.e. ASI N2, military or technician) will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, through the

Commander to NDT PM. (See glossary, Section II, Terms - Grandfather Clause).

Table 3-2 Minimum Experience Requirements

Experience

METHOD TSQ1 Level I2 Level II3 Level II4 Level III5 Level III6 Level III7

Penetrant 13hrs 130hrs 270hrs 400hrs 4yrs 2yrs 1yrMag particle 13hrs 130hrs 400hrs 530hrs 4yrs 2yrs 1yr

Eddy Current 40hrs 400hrs 1200hrs 1600hrs 4yrs 2yrs 1yr

Ultrasonic 40hrs 400hrs 1200hrs 1600hrs 4yrs 2yrs 1yr

Radiography 40hrs 400hrs 1200hrs 1600hrs 4yrs 2yrs 1yr

Notes:1 TSQ, total NDT experience for TSQ.2 Trainee, total NDT experience for Level I. Experience in method must be at least half this time.*3

Level I, total NDT experience for Level II. Experience in method must be at least half this time.*4

Trainee, total NDT experience for direct certification (appointment) to Level II. Experience in method must be at

least half this time.*5 Level II or equivalent experience required for Level III with no college degree. Experience in multiple methods

may be accumulated simultaneously.6 Level II or equivalent experience required for Level III with technical associate degree. Experience in multiplemethods may be accumulated simultaneously.7 Level II or equivalent work experience required for Level III with technical bachelors degree. Experience in

multiple methods may be accumulated simultaneously.

Note: Equivalency of the work experience shall be determined and documented by the Level III, or NDT PM

approved source responsible for the program. Experience in multiple methods may be accumulated simultaneously.

* Applies when remaining time is in other NDT methods when approved by the responsible Level III

or NDT PM approved source.

3-5. Commander Certification (Appointment)

a. General: Nondestructive inspections require application by trained, experienced and proficient personnel.

The reliability of these inspections is dependant upon the NDT methods employed, equipment utilized, and theproper interpretation of the inspection results. The proficiency of NDT trained personnel can only be maintained by

allocating sufficient time for theoretical study and practicing hands-on application. Commanders and supervisors

are highly encouraged to provide adequate time for NDT trained personnel to practice with NDT equipment to

increase their experience hours and to maintain technical proficiency.

b. Certification (Appointment) Procedures: Individuals with certified documentation showing that they possess

the appropriate hours of formal training and experience, passed the required examinations and evaluations IAW this

regulation, and are recommended by a TSQ Evaluator or a designated Level III (as appropriate), are eligible for

certification (appointment) by their Commander. (See glossary, section II, Terms - Grandfather Clause, for

additional information).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

9

Note. Commander certification (appointment) is not required for personnel who are designated as instructors or

NDT Auditors.

c. Responsibilities:

(1) Individuals shall maintain documentation (personal log) of all NDT formal training hours, experience

hours, completed evaluations, recommendations for NDT certifications (appointments), and copies of certification

(appointment) orders. Appropriate documentation shall be verified by a certifier.

(2) Instructors and TSQ Evaluators shall maintain appropriate documentation on the Training Experience

and Certification Tracking System (TEACTS) database for individuals to which they have provided NDT formal

training hours, completed evaluations, and recommendations for NDT certifications (appointments).

(3) Certifiers shall verify and submit appropriate documentation to the NDT Center of Excellence at

AMCOM for entry into the TEACTS database, for their NDT personnel as necessary.

(4) Commanders may certify (appoint) individuals who have the appropriate certified documentation and

recommendations IAW this regulation.

d. Certifier: Commanders, or their appointed certifier, shall ensure that all documents (see e. & f. below) are

submitted and maintained on the TEACTS database for their NDT personnel for as long as their certification

(appointment) is in effect.

e. Records: The records shall be maintained for a minimum of 3 years after certification (appointment) is

terminated (See appendix B for guidance on forms and records).

Note. Individuals are also required to maintain a personal log of all NDT time (inspection time, On the Job Training

(OJT), Calibrations, etc)

As a minimum the records shall include:(1) Name of the individual.

(2) Level, method, and techniques for which individual is certified.

(3) Method and techniques for which individual is Task Specific appointed.

(4) Date and expiration of current certification (appointment). (i.e. orders)

(5) Training history to include dates of training and course hours.

(6) Experience hours by method.

(7) Results of the current visual acuity examination.

f. Forms: The following forms shall be used to record personnel information:

(1) NDT Form 623: NDT Experience Log. (See appendix B)

(2) NDT Form 1098: NDT Task Specific Qualification Record. (See appendix B)

(3) NDT Forms 1098-1 to -12: NDT Task Specific Qualification Checklists. (See appendix E)

(4) Memorandum for Completion of NDT Task(s) Specific Qualification (TSQ). (See appendix B)

(5) Memorandum for Duty Appointment Order. (See appendix B)g. Loss of Certification (Appointment): Certification (appointment) may expire, be suspended, or be revoked.

Certification (appointment) shall expire when NDT responsibilities are terminated, or when the certification

(appointment) interval has lapsed with no recertification (reappointment) issued.

(1) Certification (Appointment) shall be suspended when the visual acuity examination is overdue, the

individual does not perform in the method certified for at least 12 consecutive months, or the individual’s

performance is found to be deficient in any manner, or directed by the Commander, or the NDT PM. This includes

failure of any recertification examinations or proficiency evaluations.

(2) Certification (Appointment) shall be revoked when the individual does not perform in the method

certified (appointed) for at least 24 consecutive months, the individuals conduct is found to be unethical or

incompetent, or directed by the Commander.

(3) Reinstatement of Certification (Appointment): Certifications (Appointments) that have been suspended

may be reinstated when the cause for the suspension has been corrected. Certifications (Appointments) that have

expired or been revoked may not be reinstated except by requalification (proficiency) evaluation.h. Loss of TSQ Qualification. If inspections are not performed within the 180 day currency period the TSQ is

suspended and a requalification (proficiency) evaluation will be required.

i. Certification/Qualification Maintenance (Recertification/Requalification)

(1) TSQ: TSQ personnel shall requalify annually, not to exceed the end of the month of their original

appointment.

Note. TSQ requalification is not applicable while an individual is mobilized, but requalification must be

accomplished NLT 90 days from post-mobilization.

(2) TSQ Evaluator: TSQ Evaluators shall requalify every three years, not to exceed the end of the month of

their original appointment.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

10

Note. TSQ Evaluator requalification is not applicable while an individual is mobilized, but requalification must be


(3) Level I and Level II: Level I and Level II personnel shall requalify at intervals not to exceed five years.

The general knowledge, specific knowledge and practical (hands on) examinations, equivalent to those required for

initial qualification, shall be required. Additionally, the certifier shall be responsible for ensuring technical currency

(TEACTS database) is maintained for their Level I and Level II personnel. Documentation of proficiency

maintenance shall be the responsibility of the Commander, or their designated certifier. Examples may include

continuing education, midterm evaluations, Level III observations of part processing, and attending NDT refresher

training clinics.

(4) Level III: Level III personnel shall requalify at intervals not to exceed five years. Requalification,

including the practical examination, may be accomplished by documented experience or by re-examination. If

equipment operation or accepting production hardware is required on a regular basis as a primary part of their duties,

a practical examination equivalent to initial certification (appointment) shall be administered. Revoked Level III

certifications (appointments) shall be reinstated only by examination equivalent to initial qualification.

(5) Certification (Appointment)/Qualification Extensions:

(a) TSQ: An extension of the certification (appointment) may be granted with the approval of the

responsible Level III, through the Commander to NDT PM, or NDT PM approved source. TSQ extensions shall not

exceed 30 days from the end of the month of their current certification (appointment).

(b) TSQ Evaluator: An extension of the certification (appointment) may be granted with the approval of the

responsible Level III, through the Commander to NDT PM, or NDT PM approved source. Extensions shall not

exceed one (1) year from the end of the month of their current certification (appointment).(c) Level I, Level II, and Level III: An extension for the general, specific, and practical portions of the

qualification may be granted with the approval of the responsible Level III, through the Commander to NDT PM, or

NDT PM approved source. Extensions shall not exceed one (1) year from the end of the month of their current

certification (appointment).

j. Outside Agency: NDT PM may utilize an outside agency to develop a qualification program, train and

examine NDT personnel and perform any other Level III function. An outside agency can qualify, but not certify

(appoint) personnel. NDT PM shall approve the suitability of any outside source selected to perform any function to

meet the requirements of this regulation. The documentation provided by the outside source shall be of sufficient

detail to verify/validate that the outside agency is capable of performing the required Level III functions.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

11

Appendix A

References

Section I

Required Publications

This section contains no entries

Section II

Related Publications

AR 750-1

Army Materiel Maintenance Policy

DA Pam 385-24

The Army Radiation Safety Program

DA Pam 738-751

Functional Users Manual for the Army Maintenance Management System-Aviation (TAMMS-A)

FM 3-04.500 (FM 1-500)Aviation Maintenance Management

NAS 410

NAS Certification & Qualification of Nondestructive Test Personnel

TM 1-1500-335-23

Nondestructive Inspection Methods

TM 1-1500-344-23-1 thru 4

Aircraft Weapons Systems Cleaning and Corrosion Control

TM 1-1520-253-23

Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for CH/MH-47 Helicopter Series

TM 1-1520-254-23 Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for OH-58 A/C Helicopter Series

TM 1-1520-256-23

Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for UH-1 Helicopter Series

TM 1-1520-264-23

Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for AH-64A Helicopter Series

TM 1-1520-265-23 Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for H-60 Helicopter Series

TM 1-1520-266-23Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for OH-58 D Helicopter Series

TM 1-1500-366-23

Nondestructive Inspection General Procedures and Process Controls

TM 55-1500-345-23

Painting and Marking of Army Aircraft

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

12

American Society for Nondestructive Testing (ASNT)

Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A - Personnel Qualification and Certification in Nondestructive Testing

Section III

Prescribed Forms

This section contains no entries

Section IV

Referenced Forms

NDT Form 623

NDT Experience Log

NDT Form 1098-1 to -12NDT Task Specific Qualification Record

Appendix BTraining Experience and Certification Tracking System (TEACTS)

B-1. Scope

To detail the documentation and record keeping required by paragraph 3-5c. and d. of NGR 750-410. The

documentation and records required shall be maintained in two separate folders, one by the NDT individual and the

other by a certifier appointed by the Commander.

B-2. ResponsibilityThe responsibility of maintaining TEACTS documentation is as follows:

a. NDT Individual: Responsibilities include documenting inspections performed on NDT Form 623.

b. NDT Supervisor/Certifier –

(1) Responsibilities include tracking personnel training, experience, levels of qualification, certification

(appointment) and Task Specific Qualifications (TSQ). Records shall be maintained on NDT Form 623 and NDTForm 1098.

(2) Monthly updates to the TEACTS Database.

(3) Initiates and maintains Commander’s orders for qualifications, certification (appointment) and TSQ.

B-3. NDT Experience Record, NDT Form 623 (as NDT Individual Log)

(Expanded explanation of sample Form 623 - see sample 1 Form 623 below)

a. NAME – Last, First, Middle Initial.

b. ORGANIZATION - (example, AASF #1, Columbus, OH or A Co, 8/101st, Ft. Campbell, KY).

c. IND - NDT Individual tracking form, mark appropriate box.

d. NDT METHOD - Mark NDT test method being logged, one method per page only.

e. DATE - DD/MMM/YY.

f. TASK ID - Record TM/TB and paragraph number or SOF/ASAM/MIM to include item inspected

nomenclature i.e., T/R pitch beam.g. HOURS - Time, logged in half hour increments required to accomplish a task.

h. T/HRS - Total (accumulated) experience hours acquired in an individual test method.

i. CERTIFIER – (See glossary)

j. REMARKS – As needed.

Note. Successive page numbers shall be numbered per method , example: Method ET, Page 1 to be followed by

Method ET, Page 2 etc.

B-4. NDT Experience Record, NDT Form 623 (NDT Supervisor/Certifier Log)


8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

13

a. NAME – Last, First, Middle Initial.

b. ORGANIZATION - (example, AASF #1, Columbus, OH or A Co. 8/101st, Ft. Campbell, KY).

c. CERTIFIER - Mark appropriate box.

d. NDT METHOD - Mark NDT test method being logged, one method per page only.

e. DATE - DD/MMM/YY.

f. TASK ID – (optional for certifier) Record TM/TB and paragraph number or the SOF, ASAM, MIM number

along with the component inspected nomenclature i.e., T/R pitch beam.

g. HOURS – Monthly total verified from individuals NDT Form 623.

h. T/HRS - Total (accumulated) experience hours acquired in an individual test method.

i. CERTIFIER – Certifies technician data has been updated on TEACTS database.

j. REMARKS – As needed.

Note. Individual NDT records should be verified monthly and updated on the TEACTS database at the end of each

calendar month.

B-5. NDT Form 1098 - Task Specific Qualification (TSQ)


a. TASK or RECURRING TRAINING – Enter TM, ASAM, SOF, MIM number along with the component

inspected nomenclature.

b. DATE PERFORMED - Enter date TSQ was performed.

c. PRINT/SIG. of CERTIFYING OFFICIAL – Printed name and signature of TSQ Evaluator.

d. PID of TRAINEE – Acknowledging TSQ has been conducted.e. SCORE – Pass/Fail grade.

f. TYPE – Method of NDT utilized (ET, UT, RT, MT, PT).

g. FREQUENCY- TSQ will be accomplished annually.

h. DUE DATE – Date shall be one (1) year from the date individual passed the TSQ evaluation. Personnel not

successfully accomplishing a TSQ assessment SHALL receive additional training as prescribed by the Commander,

NDT PM, NDT Level III or an NDT PM approved source.

i. Last, First, Middle Initial.

j. Individuals PID.

k. Organization.

Note. Personnel re-qualifying on a TSQ shall enter the requalification date as a new entry.

B-6. Sample TSQ Recommendation Memo

See example for required information and format

B-7. Sample TSQ Appointment OrderSee example for required information and format

B-8. NDI Folders

All additional forms required by paragraph 3-5. NGR 750-410 shall be included in the folders maintained by the

NDT Certifier (example, training certificates, test scores etc.).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

14

NDT EXPERIENCE RECORD (Individual) - NDT FORM 623 (Sample 1)

NDT Form 623

C

NAME: X IND

D

RT X ET PT

UT MT VT

E G H

DATE HRS T/ HRS

26-Feb-03 0.5 0.5

18-Mar-03 2.0 2.5

19-Mar-03 4.0 6.5

23-Mar-03 1.5 8.0

Created 26 Feb 03 Method ET Page 1

F I J

DOE JANE R.

AASF #1, COLUMBUS, OH.

CERTIFIER

ORGANIZATION:

NDT METHOD

D. MORROW

(PRINT/SIG.)

D. MORROW

(PRINT/SIG.)S. HUDDLESTON

(PRINT/SIG)

MIM UH-1-03-01 TAIL

ROTOR PULLEY BRACKET

TM 1-1520-265-23, Para.2.29

UH-60 T/R pitch beam

TASK ID

TM 1-1520-265-23, Para. 3.18

Aluminum crack standard TM 1-1520-265-23, Para. 3.18

Aluminum crack standard

REMARKSCERTIFIERD. MORROW

(PRINT/SIG.)

ONE ACFT INSPECTED

A

B

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

15

NDT EXPERIENCE RECORD (Certifier) - NDT FORM 623 (Sample 2)A C

NAME: IND X

D

RT X ET PT

UT MT VT

E G H

DATE HRS T/ HRS

28-Feb-03 0.5 0.5

31-Mar-03 7.5 8.0

NDT Form 623Created 26 Feb 03

Method ET Page 1

F I J

DOE JANE R.

AASF #1, COLUMBUS, OH.

B

CERTIFIER

ORGANIZATION:

NDT METHOD

D. MORROW

(PRINT/SIG.)

TASK ID

(optional)

REMARKSCERTIFIERD. MORROW

(PRINT/SIG.)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

16

NDT Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) RECORD – NDT FORM 1098 (Sample 3)

INITIALS

OF

TRAINEE

PASS

FAIL OR

SCORE TYPE FREQUENCY DUE DATE

A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H.

SOF UH-60-03-01 PGC 14-Feb-03

S. HUDDLESTONE.P. FAIL UT ANNUAL RETEST

SOF UH-60-03-01 PGC

21-Feb-03

S. HUDDLESTON

E.P. PASS UT ANNUAL 21-Feb-04

SOF UH-60-03-01 PGC

21-Feb-04

D. MORROW

E.P. PASS UT ANNUAL 21-Feb-05

J. INITIALS

E.P.

NDT Form 1098Created 26 Feb 03

Page ___ of ___

SPECIAL TASK CERTIFICATION AND RECURRING TRAINING

PRESLEY, ELVIS A.

K. ORGANIZATION

AASF#1 TUPELO, MS.

TASK OR RECURRING

TRAINING AND TECHNICAL

REFERENCE

S

DATE

PERFORMED

PRINT/SIG. OF

CERTIFYING

OFFICIAL

EVALUATION OF TRAINING

I. NAME OF NDT INDIVIDUAL ( Last, First , Middle Initial)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

17

SAMPLE TSQ RECOMMENDATION MEMO

LETTER HEAD

OFFICE SYMBOL: DATE:

MEMORANDUM FOR:

SUBJECT: Completion of NDT Task(s) Specific Qualification (TSQ)

REFERENCES: NGR 750-410

1. The following individual has successfully completed the evaluation for Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) in

accordance with NGR 750-410 as verified on TSQ Checklist.

Name Type Task ID Date Due date

Elvis Presley UTUH-60-03-01,

PGC inspection21Feb03 21Feb04

2. Recommend appointment in the Task(s) above in accordance with NGR 750-410, Para 3-2.b.

3. Proficiency and currency requirements will be maintained in accordance with NGR 750-410, Para 3-5.g.

4. TSQ hours will count toward the individual’s total certification (appointment) time.

5. POC for TSQ training is MSG Jane Doe

DSN/COMM:

E-Mail:

TSQ Evaluator’s signature block

DISTRIBUTION:

(as required)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

18

SAMPLE TSQ APPOINTMENT ORDER

LETTER HEAD

OFFICE SYMBOL Date

MEMORANDUM FOR SEE DISTRIBUTION

SUBJECT: Duty Appointment order # xxxxx

1. Effective DD/MMM/YY, the following personnel are appointed as (Method & Level, Task Specific Qualification

[TSQ]) inspectors:

MSG Jane Doe

SSG John Smith

SPC Orville Oatmeal

2. Authority: NGR 750-410, ARNG Aviation Nondestructive Testing Program.

3. Purpose: To perform (Method and Level, Task(s) Specific Qualification [TSQ]) inspections on aircraftstructures, panels and components.

4. Period: (DD/MMM/YY) through (DD/MMM/YY).

5. Special Instructions: Maintain appointment IA/W NGR 750-410.

Commander’s signature block

DISTRIBUTION:(as required)

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

19

Appendix C

Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) and Evaluation Process

C-1. Scope

To describe the requirements of the Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) and requalification evaluation process in

paragraph 3-2.b. of NGR 750-410. This appendix provides checklists for assessing and documenting the proficiency

of NDT personnel performing common NDT tasks.

C-2. Responsibility

TSQ Evaluators, appointed by the NDT PM, will be responsible for administering TSQ evaluations. Personnel

administering TSQ evaluations shall receive TSQ Evaluator instruction and pass applicable TSQ Evaluator exams,

prior to performing TSQ evaluations. TSQ Evaluators shall be active members of the NG Technician program.

a. TSQ Evaluator responsibilities:

(1) Verifies TSQ Evaluator Checklist requirements are met prior to TSQ evaluation. (Ref: appendix C, TSQ

Evaluator Checklist, table C-2)

(2) Conducts, grades and records TSQ evaluation(s) on applicable NDT Form 1098-1 thru -12.

(3) Completes and forwards to the Commander the TSQ Checklist and memorandum of recommendation.

b. Unit/Facility Certifier responsibilities:

(1) Tracks personnel training, experience, levels of qualification, certification, and Task Specific

Qualifications (TSQ).

(2) Records data on NDT Form 623 and NDT Form 1098.(3) Monitors the currency and proficiency of TSQ individuals IAW NGR 750-410.

(4) Inputs monthly updates to the TEACTS Database.

(5) Initiates and maintains appointment orders for qualifications, certification and TSQ.

(6) Provides TSQ Evaluator with checklist documents prior to individual being TSQ evaluated.

C-3. Equipment

TSQ evaluations shall only be conducted using equipment approved by NDT PM, or NDT PM approved source.

Equipment process control checks shall be addressed within each TSQ Checklist. Refer to table C-3 for required

equipment.

C-4. Task Specific Qualification Methods/Inspections

TSQ may be conducted for Trainee and Level I personnel. When required by NDT PM, Level II personnel shall

TSQ on specific methods/inspections. Currently the following methods of NDT or specific applications of NDTmethodologies (MT, PT, RT, UT, ET) shall have TSQ evaluations performed. Preferably TSQ should be conducted

at the unit facility. TSQ shall be maintained IAW the TSQ Currency and Proficiency Maintenance Table, table C-1.

a. Penetrant Testing (PT). (1) Method B / D, (Stationary equipment). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the

penetrant inspection process. Two different test articles shall be evaluated during the examination. One test article

may be a process control panel, and the other shall be representative of an aircraft component to be encountered by

the examinee during the performance of their duties. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test

articles.

(2) Method C, (Portable). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the penetrant inspection

process. Two different test articles shall be evaluated during the examination. One test article may be a process

control panel the other shall be representative of an aircraft component to be encountered by the examinee during

the performance of their duties. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test articles.

b. Magnetic Particle Testing (MT).(1) Stationary (wet bath). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the magnetic particle

inspection process. Two different test articles shall be evaluated during the examination. One test article may be a

process control standard, and the other shall be representative of an aircraft component to be encountered by the

examinee during the performance of their duties. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test articles.

(2) Portable (yoke/coil). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the magnetic particle

inspection process. Two different test articles shall be evaluated during the examination. One test article may be a

process control standard, the other shall be representative of an aircraft component to be encountered by the

examinee during the performance of their duties. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test articles.

c. Eddy Current Testing (ET).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

20

(1) Eddy Current (general) TSQ:

(a) Material Sorting, 50-500 kilohertz (KHz). The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the eddy

current calibration and inspection process. The individual shall be able to identify the material type of an aircraft

component which would be encountered by the examinee during the performance of their duties.

(b) General inspection, 50-500 kilohertz (KHz). The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the eddy

current calibration and inspection process. Two different test articles shall be evaluated for each TSQ examination.

Test samples shall be representative of aircraft components to be encountered by the examinee during the

performance of their duties. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test article.

(c) General inspection, 2 Megahertz (MHz). The examinee shall properly perform the calibration of the

eddy current instrument. The TSQ may require the performance of a test article inspection.

(2) UH-60 M/R Hub 11 O’clock Bolt Hole Eddy Current Inspection (Use of special kit required). TSQ: The

examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the eddy current calibration and inspection process. This TSQ

requires a minimum of four bolt holes (1 main rotor hub) to be properly inspected for TSQ. The examinee shall

determine the acceptability of the test article.

(3) CH-47 Rotor Head Lighting Hole Eddy Current Inspection (Use of special kit required). TSQ: The

examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the eddy current calibration inspection process. This TSQ requires a

minimum of 12 lightening holes (1 rotor head) to be properly inspected for TSQ. The examinee shall determine the

acceptability of the test article.

d. Ultrasonic Testing (UT).

(1) AH-64 Strap Pack OTBD Bolt Ultrasonic Inspection (Use of special kit required). TSQ: The examinee

shall properly perform all aspects of the ultrasonic calibration and inspection process. This TSQ requires aminimum of four bolts (1main rotor hub) to be properly inspected for TSQ. The examinee shall determine the

acceptability of the test article.

(2) UH-60 Spindle Lug Inspection (Use of special kit required). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform

all aspects of the ultrasonic calibration and inspection process. This TSQ requires a minimum of 16 spindle lugs (1

main rotor hub) to be properly inspected for TSQ. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test article.

(3) UH-60 Bifilar Weight Inspection. TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the

ultrasonic calibration and inspection process. This TSQ requires a minimum of four weights to be properly

inspected for TSQ. The examinee shall determine the acceptability of the test article.

e. Radiography Testing (RT).

(1) Radiography (general). TSQ: The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the radiographic

inspection process. This TSQ requires a minimum of two test articles to be radiographed. The examinee shall

determine the acceptability of the test article. Film interpretation shall be included in this TSQ

(2) UH-1 Tail Boom Radiographic Inspection. TSQ: This TSQ requires the generation of two sets of acceptable film. The examinee shall properly perform all aspects of the radiographic inspection. The examinee

shall also be knowledgeable of safety requirements and hazards associated with radiography inspections.

Note. This TSQ does not qualify personnel to interpret radiographs.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

21

Table C-1

TSQ Currency and Proficiency Maintenance

NDT Method

CurrencyMaintenance

(180 days)

[1] [2] [3]

Proficiency

Maintenance

[4]

Penetrant (PT)

Method B / D 1 inspection Annual review

Method C 1 inspection Annual review

Magnetic Particle (MT)

Wet bath (Stationary) 1 inspection Annual review

Yoke/Coil (Portable) 1 inspection Annual review

Eddy Current (ET)

General 1 inspection Annual reviewUH-60 M/R Hub 11

o'clock bolt hole

1 inspection Annual review

CH-47 M/R HeadLightening holes

1 inspection Annual review

Ultrasonic Testing (UT)

AH-64 Strap Pack Bolt 1 inspection Annual review

UH-60 Spindle Lug 1 inspection Annual review

UH-60 Bifilar Weights 1 inspection Annual review

Radiography Testing (RT)

General (Water/FOD) 1 inspection Annual review

UH-1 Vertical Fin 1 inspection Annual review[1] Task verified by certifier, entries made on individuals NDT Form 623.

[2] Inspections performed shall utilize the specific inspection application technique as required by maintenance

manuals, SOF, ASAM or for just cause.

[3] If inspections are not performed within the 180 day period the TSQ is suspended and a requalification

(proficiency) evaluation will have to be conducted.

[4] NDT 1098 entry required

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

22

C-5. TSQ Evaluator Checklist

The TSQ Evaluator Checklist requirements will be verified by the TSQ Evaluator prior to arrival at the requesting

facility.

Table C-2

TSQ Evaluator Checklist

Pre-TSQ Requirements

Requirement DescriptionAvailable

(Yes/No)

Training Certificate(FAX'd)

Does the individual have initial training certificate for NDT method

Documented Experience(FAX'd)

Does the individual have 10% of the Level I hours in NDT method

Current Eye Examination(FAX'd)

Near Vision and Color Perception

NDT Equipment Available and operational

Process Control

EquipmentAvailable and operational

Aircraft or TSQ

Evaluator Kit AvailableTSQ is optimized when performed on-aircraft – but not required

Publications/Manuals/Pr

ocedures

Current publications/procedures for inspection and equipment, i.e

Maintenance Manuals, NDT Manual (TM 1-1500-335-23), Aircraft

NDT Manuals

On-Station Requirements

Requirement DescriptionAvailable

(Yes/No)

NDT EquipmentAvailable, operational and adequate, i.e. PT Method D vs A; Type 1 vs

Type 2

Process Control

EquipmentAvailable and operational

Publications/Manuals

/Procedures

Current procedures for inspection and equipment, i.e Maintenance

Manuals, NDT Manual (TM 1-1500-335-23), Aircraft NDT Manuals

FormsProper forms being used for documenting Process Control, Radiation

Safety, Component Inspection

C-6. Unit Equipment Requirement ChecklistUnit equipment requirements are mandatory process control items which must be locally purchased prior to TSQ

evaluation being conducted for the applicable test method.

Table C-3

Unit Equipment Requirement Checklist

Item Qty NSN orP/N Method Usage

Process Control Kit 1 6635-01-256-3418 PT Stationary

PSM-5 2 5895-01-225-5532 PT Stationary/Portable

Black/White Light Radiometer 1 6695-01-434-5112 PT/MT Stationary/PortableQuantitative Quality Indicator (QQI) 8 * xx-230 MT Stationary/Portable

Magnetic Field Indicators 4 6635-00-391-0058 MT Stationary/Portable

Applicable Probe/Transducer Kits 1 As required UT/ET Portable

TLD, EPD2/PD10i, Survey Meters as

needed-

RT Portable

* Vendor P/N will vary. QQI's should be .250" x .250" miniature design with 30% flaw depth.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

23

C-7 Task Specific Qualification (TSQ) Checklist

The TSQ Checklist shall be filled out by the TSQ Evaluator. An "X" shall be entered in either the PASS or FAIL

column for each evaluation checkpoint. Evaluation points not applicable to the TSQ being performed shall be filled

in with "N/A". Specific areas of the TSQ Checklist are shaded in and contain an asterisk (*), these areas are talking

points. The TSQ evaluator should discuss the topic with the examinee, sharing knowledge as well as querying the

examinees knowledge and understanding of the specific requirement. (See appendix E for TSQ Checklists)

C-8. TSQ Example Checklist

The checklist below is provided as an example of a completed TSQ evaluation. It is recommended the evaluator

have the examinee sign the form in the comments section to provide acknowledgement of the documented results on

the TSQ.

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ ULTRASONIC

(H-60 SPINDLE LUG)

NAME PVT Oatmeal ORGANIZATION B Co., 193rd AVN

DATE 5 June 2003 TSQ EXPIRES 5 June 2004

Inspection/Instrument Preparation: P a s s

F a i l

1. Did examinee select the proper standard and transducer(s)? X

2. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23,

TM 1-1500-344-23 and inspection procedure?X

Calibration:1. Were the correct instrument settings entered into the UT instrument? X

2. Examinee's overall familiarity with test instrument. X

3. Was the RH EDM notch located IAW the inspection procedure? X

4. Proficiency of the examinee performing the RH calibration. X

5. Was the electronic GATE positioned IAW the inspection procedure? X

6. Was the LH EDM notches located IAW the inspection procedure? X

7. Proficiency of the examinee performing the LH calibration. X

Inspection Process:

1. Was adequate couplant applied to the lug surface? X

2. Did the examinee provide inspection coverage of all applicable lug surface utilizing the

RH transducer?X

3. Was the gain adjusted to compensate for variances in the LH and RH transducers and

EDM notches? X

4. Did the examinee provide inspection coverage of all applicable lug surfaces utilizing the

LH transducer?X

Interpretation/Evaluation:

1. Did the inspection performed exhibit excessive signal noise possibly from couplant or

paint variances?* *

2. Was the examinee capable of discerning relevant signal responses from non-relevant

indications?X

3. Did the examinee detect and correctly interpret all relevant indications? X

Documentation:

1. Were inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *

*Shaded evaluation areas are talking points with examinee. * *

Examiner: /Evaluator Signature/ Date: 5 June 2003 Pass FailPage 1 of 1

Comments: PVT Oatmeal displayed a thorough understanding of the inspection procedure

/ Signed PVT Oatmeal /

NDT Form 1098-11

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

24

Appendix D

Sample NDT SOP

This Nondestructive Testing Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is provided by the

Nondestructive Testing Center of Excellence

SFAE-AV-AS-AGBldg 7770, Lab 18, Redstone Arsenal, AL 35898

DSN 897-0211, Commercial (256) 313-0211

Email: [email protected]

This document is intended to be a guide for organizations to develop or enhance their own SOP.

Aviation Units should modify this document to meet organizational needs.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

25

Page

Applicability 3

Purpose 3

References 3

Objective 3

Revisions 3

Responsibilities 4

Personnel 5

Physical Requirements 5

NDT Qualification/Certification Maintenance 5

Equipment 6

Process Material 6

Part Preparation 6

NDT Operations 7

Safety 7

ARNG Aviation NDT Program Overview 8

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

26

D-1. Applicability:

a. This SOP applies to all persons performing or responsible for the performance of nondestructive testing

(NDT) and/or safety related activities associated with the utilization of nondestructive methodologies within ( Enter

Unit’s Name).

b. Deviation from the guidelines set forth by this SOP may only be authorized by the Unit Commander.

D-2. Purpose:

a. To define Nondestructive Testing standard operating procedures, responsibilities, qualification/certification

policies, operational/process control procedures, and safety requirements for personnel performing nondestructive

testing.

b. To provide the guidelines necessary for active Army, National Guard and Reserve activities to support the

requirements of Army Aviation Nondestructive Testing.

c. Commanders SHALL ensure compliance with these requirements for all aviation resources under their

control. All activities that perform nondestructive test methods shall prepare a written NDT plan.

D-3. References: Related publications are listed in appendix-A.

a. AR 385-10, Army Safety Program

b. DA Pam 385-24, The Army Radiation Safety Program

c. NGR 750-410, Maintenance of Supplies and Equipment Army National Guard Aviation Nondestructive

Testing Program

d. TM 1-1500-335-23, Nondestructive Inspection Methodse. TM 1-1500-344-23, Aircraft Weapons Systems Cleaning and Corrosion Control

f. TM 55-1500-345-23, Painting and Marking of Army Aircraft

g. TM 1-1500-366-23, Nondestructive Inspection Procedures for OH-58 D Helicopter Series

D-4. Objectives:

a. To provide safe, fully mission capable aircraft to meet all training and tactical mission requirements.

b. To ensure maximum operational readiness of equipment.

c. To detect and correct early potential equipment failure.

d. To enhance aircraft material readiness.

e. To standardize process controls, personnel qualification, and applicable procedures.

D-5. Revisions: This SOP SHALL be reviewed and if necessary revised, each and every time a new or revised

Department of Army (DA) publication that impacts the contents of this SOP is fielded. All personnel who arepermanently assigned and/or attached to (Unit Name) may submit proposed changes to this document to the

Commander (Unit Name).

D-6. Responsibilities:

a. ( Enter Unit’s Name) Commander

(1) Overall responsibility for the supervision of an effective and safe NDT program.

(2) Responsible for overall function of NDT operations.

(3) Responsible for authorizing only trained and qualified personnel to conduct nondestructive inspections.

(4) *Establish in writing, a formal radiation safety program consistent with Federal and Army Regulations to

ensure that adequate resources (personnel, funding, material) are provided to implement and maintain an effective

program.

(5) *Responsible for appointing a Radiation Safety Officer (RSO), Assistant Radiation Safety Officer(ARSO), NDT Supervisor, and any other essential personnel required by applicable documents.

b. *Radiation Safety Officer/Assistant Radiation Safety Officer.

(1) The Radiation Safety Officer SHALL establish and manage the radiation protection program

(2) Additional specific duties of the RSO/ARSO are defined in DA Pam 385-24 and TM 1-1500-335-23.

c. Radiography and/or NDT Supervisor.

(1) *Radiography Supervisor.

(a) *Supervise overall industrial radiography operations and ensure compliance with all aspects of the

radiation protection program.

(b) *Additional specific duties of the Radiography Supervisor are defined in TM 1-1500-335-23.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

27

(2) **NDT Supervisor or Powertrain Shop NCOIC.

(a) **Supervise overall NDT Program to ensure compliance with all aspects of personnel qualification,

radiation safety, and equipment/material process control per NGR 750-410 and TM-1500-335-23.

* As required by Units (active duty and National Guard) owning industrial radiographic equipment.

** Relative to National Guard Regulation NGR-750-410.

D-7. Personnel: NDT methods in the hands of a trained and experienced technician are capable of detecting flaws

or defects with a high degree of accuracy and reliability. It is important NDT personnel are fully knowledgeable of

the capabilities of each method but it is equally important they recognize the limitations of the methods. Personnel

SHALL meet the minimum QUALIFICATIONS (formal training, on the job training, physical requirements).

a. Active Army – SHALL be qualified by successful completion of the TRADOC Inter-service Training and

Review Organization (ITRO) NDT Apprentice Course (ASI N2), or MOS 15D AIT Course after 1 Oct 2007.

b. ARNG, AGR, M-DAY, SAD, ADSW, IDT, and AT Technicians - Shall be trained, qualified, and certified

per the requirements of NGR 750-410 or NAS 410.

c. On the job training (OJT). Hands-on training for the practical application of NDT disciplines SHALL be

received from personnel qualified and certified for the inspection being performed. All OJT SHALL be documented

and the documents SHALL indicate the name of the trainee, the name and signature of the OJT trainer, the date of

the training, the NDT procedure used and the signature of the certifier.

D-8. Physical Requirements.a. NDT personnel SHALL receive a near vision acuity test (Jaeger #1 not less than 12 inches) or its equivalent

prior to initial certification and annually while certified. The near vision test is required for only one eye either

natural or corrected.

b. NDT personnel SHALL receive a color perception test prior to initial certification and recertification. Any

limitations in color perception SHALL be evaluated by the responsible Level III or other responsible party.

Limitations SHALL be entered in the individual’s training records, and SHALL not interfere with the method being

certified.

D-9. NDT Qualification/Certification Maintenance

a. Personnel qualified to perform inspection tasks per NGR 750-410 shall maintain task specific qualification

IAW the requirements of NGR 750-410.

b. Personnel certified as NDT Level I, Level II, or Level III shall maintain certification IAW NGR 750-410 or

NAS 410.c. NDT personnel qualification/certification developmental flow chart for NDT technicians NOT

qualified/certified under the Grandfather Clause.

D-10. Equipment

a. All equipment SHALL be kept in good operating condition through periodic maintenance and routine

inspections.

b. The use of “non-standard” (other than fielded by PM AGSE) NDT equipment SHALL be coordinated and

approved through the NDT CoE, Redstone Arsenal, AL.

c. Equipment purchased for specific weapon systems or other purposes SHALL NOT be used in lieu of Army

issued equipment without the proper Item Manager/Engineering approval along with a written NDT Level III

approved inspection procedures.

d. Equipment and material process control checks and system performance checks SHALL be performed and

recorded at the appropriate intervals IAW TM 1-1500-366-23.

Note. Eddy Current, Ultrasonic and Bond Testing instruments do not require calibration by TMDE

but, SHALL be calibrated before use and at least at the conclusion of the inspection to a reference

standard designed for the specific inspection procedure.

D-11. Process Materials: Materials used for NDT shall be initially qualified by reviewing the material

certification and assuring that the material is listed in the latest revision of the associated Quality Products List

(QPL).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

28

D-12. Part Preparation: All items submitted for inspection will be free of contaminates such as corrosion, grease,

oil, carbon, dirt etc.

a. Access to surfaces and part preparation: Access to aircraft surfaces (e.g. panel removal) requiring

Nondestructive Testing, SHALL be accomplished by maintenance personnel who have properly documented

training and have experience in those particular specialties. Improper cleaning procedures/materials can cause

severe damage to the material under inspection. Preparation of parts to include, but not limited to, paint removal

and chemical etching SHALL be accomplished by maintenance personnel who are properly trained, and experienced

in those particular specialties and are aware of the effects on the part/material due to the use of these chemicals and

methods. Refer to TM 1-1500-344-23, TM 1-1500-345-23, and other applicable documents for further information.

b. Paint removal: All items requiring paint removal SHALL be performed IAW the applicable document. All

fluorescent penetrant procedures SHALL have the paint and coatings removed. Mechanical and abrasive materials

are prohibited unless permitted in writing by the responsible engineering authority. All magnetic particle inspection

procedures SHALL NOT be performed over any coating measuring greater than 0.003 inch thick. All landing gear

and critical rotating engine parts SHALL have the paint removed prior to magnetic particle inspections.

D-13. NDT Operations: Rarely should an NDI method ever be considered conclusive. Often but not always, a

defect indication detected by one method must be confirmed by another method to be considered relevant.

a. Inspection. All NDT inspections SHALL be performed IAW an approved procedure through the appropriate

TM, TB, SOF, ASAM, or other applicable publications. All procedures SHALL be followed completely. There

SHALL be no deviation to any procedure without proper written authorization from the responsible NDT Level III.

b. Work Orders. Each item or component requiring NDT will be processed through the proper channels with awork order/job request as applicable. All work orders will reference the TM/TB/SOF/ASAM- page, paragraph or

any other applicable document requiring the NDT procedure.

c. Disassembly. All components will be disassembled as required to perform the requested NDT procedure

prior to inspection. If the capability or capacity does not exist for disassembly the item SHALL be work ordered

through the appropriate shop or inspection activity.

D-14. Disposition. The NDT technician completing the inspection SHALL sign off on the appropriate forms, logs,

and/or tags for proper disposition. The paper work being signed off only pertains to the NDT inspection performed.

It does not guarantee a part has gone through all the required inspections (e.g. part meeting required thickness, bolt

hole out of tolerance, maximum repairs performed, etc.)

D-15. Safety: The following are general safety precautions and instructions individuals must understand and apply

during many phases of operation and maintenance to ensure personal safety, health and the protection of U.S. Armyproperty. Additional safety precautions are contained in Army AR 385-10 and DA Pam 385-24 as related to

radiation safety.

a. Warnings, Cautions, and Notes: WARNINGS and CAUTIONS used throughout nondestructive inspection

manuals and inspection procedures are used to highlight operating or maintenance procedures, practices, conditions,

or statements considered essential to the protection of personnel or equipment. NOTES may precede or follow the

step or procedure, depending upon the information to be highlighted.

b. Hazardous Material Warnings: Consult Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) Occupational Safety and Health

Administration (OSHA) Form 20 or equivalent for specific information on hazards, effects, and protective

equipment requirements.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

29

D-16. ARNG Aviation NDT Program Overview. Overview of ARNG Aviation NDT Program

or

or

* INITIAL TRAINING

(for each NDT method)

PT = 32 hrs

MT = 32 hrs

ET = 80 hrs

UT = 80 hrs

RT = 80 hrs

* (Meets Level II training

requirement - by method)

(Must pass course

completion exams)

TEACTS DOCUMENTED

EXPERIENCE

(Forms 623 & 1098)Self-study


TSQ Exams

TSQ Inspections

NDT Workshops

TASK SPECIFIC

QUALIFICATION (TSQ) EXAM

(Prerequisite is 10% of Level I experience -

by NDT method)

PT = 13 hrsMT = 13 hrs

ET = 40 hrs

UT = 40 hrs

RT = 40 hrs

(Commander certifies TSQ appointment)

TSQ

MAINTENANCE

(Perform 180 day


pass annual proficiency

evaluation)

TSQ

MAINTENANCE

(Perform 180 day


pass annual TSQ

proficiency evaluation)

TEACTS DOCUMENTED

EXPERIENCE(Forms 623 & 1098)

Self-study


TSQ Exams

TSQ Inspections

NDT Workshops

TSQ Evaluations (Evaluators)

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of TRAINEE

to LEVEL I

(Upon accrual of required

experience hours and pass all

Level I exams)

PT = 130 hrs

MT = 130 hrs

ET = 400 hrs

UT = 400 hrs

RT = 400 hrs

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of LEVEL I to

LEVEL II



(meets min. Level II training with

additional Level I experience)

PT = 270 hrs

MT = 400 hrs

ET = 1200 hrs

UT = 1200 hrs

RT = 1200 hrs

COMMANDER

CERTIFICATION of TRAINEE to

LEVEL II



(meets min. Level II training &

Trainee experience - without Level I)

Certification)

PT = 400 hrs

MT = 530 hrsET = 1600 hrs

UT = 1600 hrs

RT = 1600 hrs

NDT Refresher

Workshops &

Site Visits

NDT Refresher

Workshops &

Site Visits

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

30

Appendix E

TSQ Checklists: NDT Forms 1098-1 through -12

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ EDDY CURRENT (GENERAL)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRESPASS FAIL

Sorting P1/P2

1. Did examinee select the proper standards and probes?

2. Was the inspection procedure followed correctly?

3. Did the instrument accurately display the conductivity curve?

4. Was the examinee able to determine the material type of the test article?

General 50-500 kHz

Set Up and Calibration


2. Were the appropriate instrument inspection parameters selected IAW the inspection

procedure?

3. Did the calibration screen display meet the inspection procedure criteria (horizontal lift off,

5 screen division vertical deflection from the .040” EDM notch)?

4. Examinee’s overall familiarity with instrument functions and operation.Pre-Cleaning:

Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-

344-23 and the inspection procedure?

Inspection:

1. Did examinee re-null on the test piece prior to beginning the inspection?

2. Did the examinee take into consideration the effects of paint on the test part and its effect

on crack detectability when performing the instrument calibration?

3. Was the examinee knowledgeable of the inspection requirements (i.e. area of interest)?

4. Did the examinee cover the inspection area thoroughly?

5. Was the examinee able to identify nonrelevant indications (edge effect, lift off and

conductivity changes)?


1. Is the examinee knowledgeable of the potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the partbeing inspected?

2. Did the examinee detect all the required discontinuities?

3. Did the examinee accurately interpret the eddy current indications?

Documentation:

Were inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *

Post Inspection Standardization

Was post inspection standardization performed?

General 2 MHz * *

Set Up and Calibration


2. Were the appropriate instrument inspection parameters selected IAW the inspection

procedure?

3. Did the calibration screen display meet the inspection procedure criteria (horizontal lift off,5 screen division vertical deflection from the .040” EDM notch)?

4. Was post inspection standardization performed?

5. Examinee’s overall familiarity with instrument functions and operation.

*Shaded evaluation areas are talking points with examinee.

Examiner: * *

Comments: Date: Pass Fail

NDT Form 1098-1

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

31

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ EDDY CURRENT

(H-60 M/R HUB 11 O'CLOCK BOLT HOLE)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES

Set-Up:

PASS FAIL

1. Did examinee select the proper standards and probes?2. Were the appropriate instrument inspection parameters selected IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Did the calibration screen display meet the inspection procedure criteria (horizontal lift off, 5

screen division vertical deflection from the .040” EDM notch)?


Pre-Cleaning:

Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-23

and inspection procedure?

Inspection:


2. Did the examinee take into consideration the effects of paint on the test part and its effect on

crack detectability when performing the instrument calibration?


4. Did the examinee cover the inspection area thoroughly?5. Was the examinee able to identify nonrelevant indications (edge effect, lift off and conductivity

changes)?


1. Is the examinee knowledgeable of the potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part being

inspected?





Documentation:



Examiner: Date: Pass FailComments:

NDT Form 1098-2

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

32

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ EDDY CURRENT

(CH-47 ROTOR HUB)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES

Set-Up:

Pass Fail

1. Did examinee select the proper standards and probes?2. Were the appropriate instrument inspection parameters selected IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Did the calibration screen display meet the inspection procedure criteria (horizontal lift off, 5

screen division vertical deflection from the .040” EDM notch)?


Pre-Cleaning:



Inspection:


2. Did the examinee take into consideration the effects of paint on the test part and its effect on

crack detectability when performing the instrument calibration?


4. Did the examinee cover the inspection area thoroughly?5. Was the examinee able to identify nonrelevant indications (edge effect, lift off and conductivity

changes)?


1. Is the examinee knowledgeable of the potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part

being inspected?





Documentation:

Were inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? *

*


Examiner: Date: Pass FailComments:

NDT Form 1098-3

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

33

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ RADIOGRAPHY (GENERAL)NAME ORGANIZATION


Basic:

1. Does the examinee have documentation of attending the required eight hours of

annual radiographer safety refresher training (if applicable)?

* *

2. Does the examinee have the proper safety equipment (TLD, Personnel dosimeter)?

3. Were the appropriate number of survey meters available and in calibration?

4. Examinee's ability to calibrate the survey meter and knowledge of its use.

5. Candidate is familiar with documentation for equipment, exposures and personnel monitoring

devices; candidate documents required information set forth in TM 1-1500-335-23?* *

Pre-Cleaning:

Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-

23 and inspection procedure?

Equipment Set Up:

1. Did the examinee establish the required 100mR and 2mR boundaries?

2. Was the x-ray tube head set up IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Is the examinee knowledgeable of the inspection details (i.e., are of interest,

placement of film, location of the penetrameter)?4. Were x-ray operations set up in an area free from visual obstructions (If NO, were the

appropriate number of Radiation Safety Monitor Assistants available)?

Inspection

1. Was the examinee familiar with operation of the x-ray unit?

2. Did the examinee verify the 2mR boundary prior to making the exposure?

3. Was the x-ray exposure conducted IAW the inspection procedure?


1. Did the radiograph generated meet the density and sensitivity requirements IAW the x-ray

procedure?

2. Was the exposure unsharpness (Ug) at an acceptable level as to not hinder film

interpretation?

3. Did the examinee correctly interpret the radiograph?

Documentation:Inspection results are documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *


Examiner: Date: Pass Fail

Comments:

NDT Form 1098-4

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

34

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/ RADIOGRAPHY (UH-1 VERTICAL FIN)

NAME ORGANIZATION


Basic:

1. Does the examinee have documentation of attending the required eight hours of annual

radiographer safety refresher training (if applicable)?* *

2. Does the examinee have the proper safety equipment (TLD, Personnel dosimeter)?

3. Were the appropriate number of survey meters available and in calibration?

4. Examinee's ability to calibrate the survey meter and knowledge of its use.

5. Candidate is familiar with documentation for equipment, exposures and personnel monitoring

devices; candidate documents required information set forth in TM 1-1500-335-23?* *

Pre-Cleaning:



Equipment Set Up:

1. Did the examinee establish the required 100mR and 2mR boundaries?

2. Was the x-ray tube head set up IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Is the examinee knowledgeable of the inspection details (i.e., are of interest, placement of film,

location of the penetrameter)?4. Were x-ray operations set up in an area free from visual obstructions (If NO, were the

appropriate number of Radiation Safety Monitor Assistants available)?

Inspection

1. Was the examinee familiar with operation of the x-ray unit?

2. Did the examinee verify the 2mR boundary prior to making the exposure?

3. Was the x-ray exposure conducted IAW the inspection procedure?


1. Did the radiograph generated meet the density and sensitivity requirements IAW the x-ray

procedure.

2. Was the exposure unsharpness (Ug) at an acceptable level as to not hinder film interpretation?

3. Is the area of interest acceptable for interpretation?

Documentation:

Inspection results are documented IAW DA Pam 738-751. * **Shaded evaluation areas are talking points with examinee. * *


Comments:

NDT Form 1098-5

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

35

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/PENETRANT (PORTABLE)

NAME ORGANIZATION


Set-Up:

1. Is the radiometer calibration current?

2. Verification of black light intensity.3. Verification of ambient light intensity. * *

Pre-Cleaning:

1. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-

23 and inspection procedure?

2. Verification that abrasive mechanical methods were not employed in the pre-cleaning operation,

unless detection is required because of abrasive operations?* *

Penetrant Application/Dwell:

1. Was the specimen temperature between 60 - 100 degrees (Temperatures outside the standard

operating range require additional considerations; refer to TM 1-1500-335-23)?

2. Was the penetrant applied properly?

3. Was the area of inspection completely covered with penetrant?

4. Was the appropriate dwell time utilized?

Penetrant Removal:1. Was the removal process conducted under a black light?

2. Was the specimen wiped clean with a lint free dry rag or towel by making a single pass? Were

successive passes performed by folding the rag or towel to provide fresh surface for each

succeeding wipe?

3. When the surface penetrant was reduced to a minimum, was a rag or towel moistened lightly

with solvent remover utilized to remove the remaining penetrant?

4. Was a final dry wipe performed prior to developer application?

Developer Application/Dwell:

1. Was the solvent remover allowed to completely evaporate from the part surface prior to

applying the developer?

2. Was the nonaqueous developer applied in a fine spray or mist?

3. Was the metallic luster of the base material apparent through the developer coating? If not,

developer coating is too thick, reprocess part. * *4. Was the appropriate developer dwell time utilized (verify minimum)?

Interpretation/Evaluation: * *

1. Was candidate knowledgeable of potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part being

inspected?* *

2. Was candidate familiar with the appearance of penetrant indications? * *

3. Did the examinee wait the proper time for dark room adaption? * *

4. Did candidate accurately interpret penetrant indications?

5. Was the "bleed back" technique employed and performed properly?

Post-Cleaning/Documentation:

1. Was the component thoroughly post-cleaned IAW TM 1-1500-335-23 and TM 1-1500-344-23?

2. Were the inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *



Comments:

NDT Form 1098-6

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

36

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/PENETRANT (STATIONARY)

NAME ORGANIZATION


Set-Up:


2. Verification of black light intensity.3. Verification of ambient light. * *

4. Verification of material performance.

4a. Verification of remover performance/contamination check. * *

4b. Verification of dryer temperature. * *

4c. Verification of water content (hydrophilic) test. * *

4d. Verification of wash nozzle check. * *

4e. Verification of penetrant wetability/surface wetting. * *

Pre-Cleaning:

1. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-

344-23 and inspection procedure?

2. Verification that abrasive mechanical methods were not employed in the pre-cleaning

operation, unless detection is required because of abrasive operations.* *

Penetrant Application/Dwell:1. Was the area of inspection or component completely covered with penetrant?

2. Was the specimen temperature between 60 - 100 degrees (Temperatures outside the standard

operating range require additional considerations; refer to TM 1-1500-335-23)?

3. Was the appropriate penetrant dwell time used?

4. Was the part rotated during the dwell time to minimize pooling?

Penetrant Removal:

1.Lipophilic Process–

1a. Was the test area or component adequately covered with the emulsifier for the entire dwell

time?

1b. Was the part rotated during the dwell time to minimize pooling?

1c. Was the prescribed dwell time closely adhered to?

2. Hydrophilic Process–

2a. Was an adequate pre-rinsed performed prior to application of the emulsifier?2b. Was the test area or component completely covered with emulsifier and agitated the entire

dwell time?

3. Lipophilic and Hydrophilic Processes-

3a. Was the removal process conducted under a black light (Applicable for Lipophilic and

Hydrophilic processes)?

3b. Was the background fluorescence acceptable after the final rinse?

Developer Application/Dwell:

1. Was the area of interest or component completely dry before application of developer (non-

aqueous or dry developer)?

2. Did the application of the developer adequately cover the area of interest (water suspended,

water soluble, non-aqueous, and dry developer)?* *

3. If applicable, was the non-aqueous developer applied in a fine spray or mist? * *

4. With the developer dwell time not starting until the developer is completely dry, was theappropriate dwell time utilized (water suspended, water soluble)?

Interpretation/Evaluation: * *

1. Was candidate knowledgeable of potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part being

inspected?* *

2. Was candidate familiar with the appearance of penetrant indications? * *


4. Did candidate accurately interpret penetrant indications?

5. Was the “bleed back” technique employed and performed properly?

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

37


1. Was the component thoroughly post-cleaned IAW TM 1-1500-335-23 and TM 1-1500-344-

23?


* Shaded evaluation areas are talking points with examinee. * *


Comments:NDT Form 1098-7

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

38

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/MAGNETIC PARTICLE (PORTABLE)

NAME ORGANIZATION


Set-Up:


2. Verification of black light intensity.3. Verification of ambient light intensity. * *

4. Performance of dead weight test (Yoke/Probe ONLY).

5. Verification of field indicator operation.

Pre-Cleaning:



Continuous Method:

1. Did the examinee place the yoke/probe in the proper locations per the inspection procedure?

2. Did the examinee place the coil or place the part in the coil as called out in the inspection

procedure?

3. Was the suspension properly agitated prior to application?

4. Was the “continuous method” properly performed (Did spraying of the magnetic particle

medium cease PRIOR to the termination of the induced magnetic fields)?Interpretation/Evaluation:

1. Was the examinee knowledgeable of potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part being

inspected?


3. Did the examinee thoroughly inspect the test article?

4. Did the examinee successfully interpret the magnetic particle indications?

Demagnetization:

Was the component properly demagnetized IAW TM 1-1500-335-23?


1. Was the component thoroughly post-cleaned IAW TM 1-1500-335-23 and TM 1-1500-

344-23?


*Shaded evaluation areas are talking points with examinee. * *Examiner: Date: Pass Fail

Comments:

NDT Form 1098-8

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

39

TASK SPECIFIC QUALIFICATION/MAGNETIC PARTICLE (STATIONARY)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES

Set-Up:

Pass Fail


2. Verification of black light intensity.3. Verification of ambient light. * *

4. Verification of settling testing

5. Verification of system effectiveness test.

6. Verification of quick break and amperage indicator check. * *

7. Verification of field indicator operation.

Pre-Cleaning:

Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-23 and

inspection procedure?

Continuous Method:

1a. Did the examinee place the component for circular magnetization IAW the inspection procedure

(i.e., central conductor, head stocks)?

1b. Was the amperage selected IAW the inspection procedure? * *

1c. Was the “continuous method” properly performed (Was the application of the magnetic particleinspection medium diverted PRIOR to the termination of electrical current)?

2a. Did the examinee place the component in the inspection coil for longitudinal magnetization IAW

the inspection procedure (i.e., bottom, centered)?

2b. Was the amperage selected IAW the inspection procedure? * *

2c. Was the “continuous method” properly performed (Was the application of the magnetic particle

inspection medium diverted PRIOR to the termination of the induced magnetic fields)?


1. Is the examinee knowledgeable of potential types of discontinuities peculiar to the part being

inspected?* *


3. Did the examinee thoroughly inspect the test article?

4. Did the examinee successfully interpret the magnetic particle indications?

Demagnetization:Was the specimen properly demagnetized IAW TM 1-1500-335-23?


1. Was the component thoroughly post-cleaned IAW TM 1-1500-335-23 and TM 1-1500-344-23?




Comments:

NDT Form 1098-9

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

40


(AH-64 STRAP PACK BOLT)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES


F a i l

1. Did examinee select the proper standard and transducer (s)?2. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-

344-23 and inspection procedure?

Calibration:

1. Were the correct instrument settings entered into the UT instrument?

2. Was the electronic GATE positioned IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Examinee’s familiarity with the test instrument.

4. Were the correct signal amplitudes obtained from the upper and lower OD EDM notches as

required per the inspection procedure?

5. Did the examinee rotate the transducer within the positioner to minimize baseline noise? * *

6. Was the examinee familiar with the thread run-out groove signal’s amplitude and time

baseline location?

7. Were the correct signal amplitudes obtained from the upper and lower ID notches?

Inspection Process:1. Was adequate couplant applied to the bolt surface prior to locating the positioner?

2. Were two (2) 360 degree passes made on the ID scan IAW the inspection procedure?

3. Was an OD calibration verified again prior to conducting the OD scan?

4. Were two (2) 360 degree passes made on the OD scan IAW the inspection procedure?


1. Did the inspection performed exhibit excessive signal noise possibly from a loss of

couplant, excessive couplant, inherent noise, contamination, etc.?* *

2. Was the examinee capable of discerning relevant signal responses from non-relevant

indications?

3. Did the examinee detect and correctly interpret all relevant indications?



Documentation:Were inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *



Comments:

NDT Form 1098-10

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

41


(H-60 SPINDLE LUG)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES


F a i l

1. Did examinee select the proper standard and transducer(s)?2. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-23


Calibration:


2. Examinee's overall familiarity with test instrument.

3. Was the RH EDM notch located IAW the inspection procedure?

4. Proficiency of the examinee performing the RH calibration.


6. Was the LH EDM notches located IAW the inspection procedure?

7. Proficiency of the examinee performing the LH calibration.

Inspection Process:

1. Was adequate couplant applied to the lug surface?

2. Did the examinee provide inspection coverage of all applicable lug surfaces utilizing the RHtransducer?

3. Was the gain adjusted to compensate for variances in the LH and RH transducers and EDM

notches?

4. Did the examinee provide inspection coverage of all applicable lug surfaces utilizing the LH

transducer?


1. Did the inspection performed exhibit excessive signal noise possibly from couplant or paint

variances?* *

2. Was the examinee capable of discerning relevant signal responses from non-relevant indications?




Documentation:Were inspection results documented IAW DA Pam 738-751? * *



Comments:

NDT Form 1098-11

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

42


(H-60 BIFILAR WEIGHT)

NAME ORGANIZATION

DATE TSQ EXPIRES


F a i l

1. Did examinee select the proper standard and transducer(s)?2. Was the area under inspection cleaned and prepped IAW TM 1-1500-335-23, TM 1-1500-344-23


Calibration:


2. Examinee's overall familiarity with test instrument.

3. Was the transducer directed at several locations to achieve optimum signal amplitude? Does

examinee understand concept?

4. Did examinee finger dampen signal to verify origin? * *


Inspection Process:

1. Was adequate couplant applied to the lug surface?

2. Did the examinee scan in a manner that would interrogate both the upper and lower portions of the

sintered bond line?Interpretation/Evaluation:

1. Did examinee understand the specific zone rejection criteria? * *

2. Did the examinee properly utilize the 6dB down technique? As a minimum examinee should

explain the concept.




Documentation:




Comments:

NDT Form 1098-12

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

43

Appendix F

Management Control Evaluation Checklist

F-1. Function

The function covered by this checklist is the inspection, evaluation, and operation of the ARNG Aviation

Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Program.

F-2. Purpose

The purpose of this checklist is to assist commanders, managers, and supervisors in evaluating the key management

controls outlined below. It is not intended to cover all controls.

F-3. Instruction

Answers must be based on the actual testing of key management controls (e.g., document analysis, direct

observation, sampling, simulation, other). Answers which indicate deficiencies must be explained and corrective

action indicated in supporting documentation. These management controls must be evaluated at least once every

five years. Certification that this evaluation has been conducted must be accomplished on DA Form 11-2-R

(Management Control Evaluation Certification Statement).

F-4. Test questions

a. Are NDT qualified and TSQ personnel appointed on orders by their Commander IAW NGR 750-410?

b. Has the Commander designated a certifier to maintain TEACTS records for NDT personnel?c. Does the certifier verify and maintain TEACTS records for NDT personnel?

d. Does the facility/activity have an NDT SOP?

e. Are near vision examinations administered annually and color perception examinations administered prior to

certification or recertification?

f. Is all hazardous waste generated from NDT inspections removed and disposed IAW Federal and Sate

regulations?

F-5. CommentsHelp make this a better test for evaluating management controls. Submit comments to NGB-AVS-A (NGR 750-

410), ARNG Readiness Center, 111 South George Mason Drive, Arlington, VA 22204-1382.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

44

Glossary

Section I

Abbreviations

AAFA

Army Aviation Flight Activity

AASF

Army Aviation Support Facility

AATSArmy Aviation Training Site (i.e., Eastern AATS, High Altitude AATS, Western AATS, Fixed Wing AATS)

ADSW

Active Duty Special Work

AG

Adjutant General

AGRActive Guard/Reserve

AIT Advanced Individual Training

AR

Army Regulation

ARNG

Army National Guard

ASIAdditional Skill Identifier

ASNT

American Society for Nondestructive Testing

ATAnnual Training

AVCRAD

Aviation Classification Repair Activity Depot

B.S.

Bachelor of Science

CFM

Career Management Field

ETEddy Current Test

IAW

In Accordance With

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

45

IDTInactive Duty for Training

KHz

Kilo Hertz

MHz

Mega Hertz

MOSMilitary Occupational Specialty

MT

Magnetic Particle Test

NDT/NDI/NDENondestructive Testing/Nondestructive Inspection/Nondestructive Evaluation

NAS

National Aerospace Standard

NGB

National Guard Bureau

NGR

National Guard Regulation

NLTNot Later Than

OJT

On the Job Training

PID

Personal Identifier

POTO

Plans, Operations and Training Office (State Army National Guard)

PT

Penetrant Test (Liquid/Dye)

PM

Program Manager

RTRadiography Test (X-Ray)

SAAO

State Army Aviation Officer

SAD

State Active Duty

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

46

SME

Subject Matter Expert

SNT-TC-1A

Society for Nondestructive Testing – Technical Committee – 1A

TEACTS

Training Experience and Certification Tracking System

TM

Technical Manual

TRADOCU.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command

TSQ

Task Specific Qualification

UT

Ultrasonic Test

Section II

Terms

Certification (Appointment)

Orders issued by a Commander certifying an individual has met the applicable training and experience requirements

IAW NGR 750-410, and is approved to perform NDT inspections for which qualified.

Certifier

Commander, or designated representative, with the responsibility and authority to document that an individual meets

the applicable requirements IAW NGR 750-410. (See Para 3-5.d. certifier)

ChecklistThe written checklist is a guide to ensure the proper use of equipment, and materials, to include adherence to

procedural details and the documentation of the results. This includes but is not limited to flaw detection and

interpretation.

Closed Book Examination

An examination administered without access to reference material, except as provided during the examination.

Reference material such as specifications, tables, formulas, etc. may be provided as determined by the responsible

Level III. Questions utilizing such material shall require understanding of the information contained therein rather

that merely finding its location.

CommanderThe AVCRAD, AASF, AATS, or Unit (M-DAY) person authorized to place individuals on “duty appointment

orders” to perform NDT inspections.

Currency

Performance in a specific method (example, ET, UT, RT, etc.) or TSQ during time periods as defined in NGR 750-

410.

Direct Readout Instrument

Direct readout instruments physically display values either as digital readout or an analog display, such as a

scale/pointer configuration. Direct readout instruments do not involve adjusting signal displays such as gates,

delays, gain, or phase to obtain measurements.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

47

DocumentedThe condition of being in written form.

Evaluation

The determination of the significance of indications.

Examination

A formal, controlled, documented test conducted in accordance with a written procedure.

ExperienceActual performance or observation conducted in the work environment resulting in the acquisition of knowledge and

skill after initial training in each specific method.

Formal Training

An organized and documented program or activities designed to impart the knowledge and skills necessary to be

qualified to this standard. This program may be a mix of classroom, laboratory and programmed self-instruction as

approved by the responsible Level III or NDT PM approved source.

General Examination

A written examination addressing the basic principles of the applicable NDT method.

Grandfather Clause

NDT personnel certified to Level I or Level II by their Commander no later than 30 Sep 02 are considered certified

in accordance with this regulation. Personnel certified after 30 Sept 02 must meet the requirements of this

regulation, unless a waiver is obtained from NDT PM. Personnel completing TRADOC NDT Apprentice course

(i.e. ASI N2, military or technician) will be evaluated on a case by case basis, through the Commander to NDT PM.

However, all personnel must comply with the certification maintenance requirements as outlined in paragraph 3-5.i.

(Certification/Qualification Maintenance), NGR 750-410.

Indication

Evidence of a material condition that requires interpretation to determine its significance.

InstructorAn individual qualified and designated, in accordance with this NGR 750-410, to provide classroom or laboratory

training for NDT personnel.

Interpretation

The determination of whether indications found during NDT are relevant or non-relevant.

M-Day

Traditional ARNG Soldier.

Method

One of the disciplines of nondestructive inspection or testing (e.g. radiography) within which different techniques

exist.

NAS-410 (National Aerospace Standard 410)A standard which establishes the minimum requirements for the qualification and certification of personnel involved

in NDT. These requirements include training, experience and examinations for personnel performing NDT.

NDT AuditorAn individual qualified to review NDT facilities and procedures for compliance to requirements. (See paragraph 3-

1.g. Approval of NDT Auditors, NGR 750-410).

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


NGR 750-410 27 February 2009

48

NDT Organization

Organization responsible for administering qualification of NDT personnel as designated by NDT PM.

NGB Approval (SOURCE)

Written documentation from the NDT Program Manager or other authorized authority.

NGB ARNG Aviation NDT Program Manager

NGB person assigned responsibility for the NGB ARNG Aviation NDT program.

NDT Supervisor

Individual designated by the Commander to manage their NDT Program. This individual should be a certified

(appointed) Level II, but may be the most NDT qualified individual available, if a Level II is not available.

On-The-Job-Training

Includes but not limited to training in the work environment in learning instrumentation set-up, equipment operation,

recognition of indications, and interpretation under supervision of Level II or a NDT PM approved source. (i.e.

Level I Task(s) Specific)

Outside Agency

As approved by NDT PM, an independent body providing training and examination of NDT personnel, or any other

NDT services to the requirements of NGR 750-410. Consultants and self-employed individuals are included in thisdefinition.

Personal Identifier (PID)

The PID is made up with the first and last name initials, plus last four numbers of the person’s Social Security

Account Number (SSAN).

Practical Examination

The examination used to demonstrate an individual’s ability in conducting the NDT methods that will be performed

for ARNG. Questions and answers need not be written, but observations and results must be documented.

Procedure

A detailed, written instruction for conducting NDT.

Proficiency

A thorough competence derived from training and practice.

Portable Equipment

NDT equipment that is capable of being carried.

Process Control

Actions and documentation that are necessary for an NDT method to be effective in detecting conditions of interest.

Qualification

The skill, training, knowledge, experience and visual acuity required for personnel to properly perform to a

particular Level.

Specific ExaminationThe written examination to determine an individual’s understanding of procedures, codes, standards and

specifications for a given method used, administered by an NDT PM approved source.

SNT-TC-1A (Society for Nondestructive Testing-Technical Committee-1A)A set of NDT qualification guidelines called the Recommended Practice No. SNT-TC-1A. Establishes levels of

qualification based upon a combination of education, training, experience, and qualification examinations.

8/3/2019 ngr750_410


27 February 2009 NGR 750-410

Stationary Equipment

NDT equipment intended to be used in a fixed location.

Technique

A category within a method; for example, ultrasonic immersion testing or ultrasonic contact testing.

Test Samples/Training Aids

Parts or images containing known defects and used in the practical examination or training to demonstrate the

individual’s proficiency in using a particular method. Test samples can refer to images of actual hardware, e.g.

radiographs. Parts shall be readily identified as training aids and stored in a secure area preventing accidental usage

or application.

TraineeIndividuals who have attended an approved training program and have not qualified to the next level of certification.

Training Program

Any NDT PM approved Training Program providing NDT method training to include DoD ASI awarding programs,

(ex: TRADOC), college/university programs or other approved training entities.

TSQ Evaluator

Individual approved by NDT PM to perform TSQ evaluations. Minimum qualifications for TSQ Evaluator are:successfully complete Level II training; accumulate Level I experience hours in a particular method; successfully

complete TSQ evaluator training and testing, as approved by NDT PM; and, receive written approval from NDT PM

as a TSQ Evaluator.

TSQ Requalification (Proficiency)

An evaluation used to assess and document the proficiency of TSQ personnel.

Note. TSQ requalification is not applicable while an individual is mobilized, but requalification must be


ngr750_410

Documents