newer antihypertensive drugs bushraabdul hadi philadelphia university
TRANSCRIPT
Newer Antihypertensive Drugs
BushraAbdul Hadi Philadelphia University
Peripheral vascular disease
Morbidity
Disability
Renal disease
CADCHFLVHStroke
Hypertension
National High Blood Pressure Education Program Working Group. Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:186-208.
Hypertension: A Significant CV and Renal Disease Risk Factor
“Older generation drugs used to bring down the B.P. fairly well at reasonable cost.”
Then, Why do we need new drugs ?• Observational and limited controlled trials
then showed marginal benefits of BP lowering for CVAs and IHD
• Unfriendly dosing schedule• Unpleasant side effects
Vasculopathy continuum
Risk Factors Endothelial Dysfunction
CAD CHF CVA PAD
CKD HTN Metabolic syndrome
Hypertension
Na+ Handling Sympathetic N system RAAS
Genetics Environment Psycho-social
HTN : Old and New
• Diuretics • Reserpine• Guanethidine• Alpha Methyl Dopa
ACE InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor BlockersBeta BlockersCentral Alpha Agon.Calcium Channel BlockersDiureticsDirect VasodilatorsAldosterone Anta.NEP Blockers
Heart
– Myocardial hypertrophy
– Interstitial fibrosis
Coronary Arteries
– Endothelial dysfunction with decreased release of nitric oxide
– Coronary constriction via release of norepinephrine
– Formation of oxygen-derived free radicals via NADH
(nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) oxidase
– Promotion of inflammatory response and plaque instability
– Promotion of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol uptake
Adapted from Opie and Gersh. Drugs for the Heart, 2001.
Potential Pathogenic Propertiesof Angiotensin II
Kidneys
– Increased intraglomerular pressure– Increased protein leak– Glomerular growth and fibrosis– Increased sodium reabsorption– Decreased renal blood flow
Adrenal Glands
– Increased formation of aldosterone Coagulation System
– Increased fibrinogen– Increased PAI-1 (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1) relative to
tissue plasminogen factor
Adapted from Opie and Gersh. Drugs for the Heart, 2001.
Potential Pathogenic Propertiesof Angiotensin II (continued)
Aldosterone
Sympathetic activation
Growthfactor stimulation
NA+ retentionH2O retentionK+ excretionMg+ excretion
Vascular smooth muscle constriction
Angiotensinconvertingenzyme(ACE)
Angiotensin II
Liver secretes angiotensinogen
Kidneys secreterenin
The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone (RAA) System
Angiotensinogen Angiotensin I
Adrenal cortex secretes aldosterone
Blood Renin
RAA System Pathways to Target Receptor Sites
AldosteroneAngiotensinogen
Angiotensin I Angiotensin IICE
Renin
Chymase
Bradykinin Inactive
K+Na+
ACTHOtherAdrenal
Vascular
Myocardial
Renal
CNS
LosartanAtenolol
(n=4,605) (n=4,588) RR (%) p-value
Primary composite† 508 588 -13 .021
CV mortality 204 234 -11 .21
Stroke 232 309 -25 .001
MI 198 188 +7 .49
Total mortality 383 431 -10 .13
New onset DM‡ 241 319 -25 <.001
LIFE: Primary and Select Secondary Outcomes
Adjusted*
* For degree of LVH and Framingham risk score at randomization† Number of patients with a first primary event‡ In patients without diabetes at randomization (losartan, n=4,019; atenolol, n=3,979)Adapted from B Dahlöf et al. Lancet. 2002;359:995-1003.
-22(P<.001)
MI, Stroke,CV Death(primary
end point)
-26(P<.001)
CV Death
-20(P<.001)
MI
-32(P<.001)
Stroke
-16(P=.005)
All-causeDeath
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Ris
k R
educ
tion
(%)
HOPE: Risk Reduction of CV EventsAssociated with ACEI (RAS Inhibition)
Treatment
Adapted from The Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:145-153.
Mechanism of Action ofMechanism of Action ofAngiotensin II Receptor AntagonistsAngiotensin II Receptor Antagonists
Angiotensinogen
Angiotensin I
Angiotensin II
AT2 receptor
AT1 receptor Other ATreceptors
Bradykinin
Inactive
peptides
VasodilationAttenuate growth anddisease progression
ACEinhibitors
Alternatepathways
AIIRAs
?
?
Val-HeFT
Results
• Overall mortality was similar in the two groups
• 13% RRR (p=.009) in combined end point
• Predominantly because of a 27% decrease in hospitalization for HF in the valsartan group
• Subgroup analyses:– Valsartan had a favorable effect in patients receiving neither an
ACE inhibitor nor a beta-blocker– Valsartan had a favorable effect in patients receiving an ACE
inhibitor or a beta blocker– Valsartan demonstrated a statistically non-significant trend
towards an adverse outcome in patients receiving an ACE inhibitor and a beta blocker
ADA Guidelines on Management of Diabetic Nephropathy
Hypertensive Type 2 Diabetic Patients*
ARBs are the initial agents of choiceType 1 Diabetics with or without
hypertension*
ACEIs are the initial agents of choice If one class is not tolerated the other
should be substituted* With microalbuminuria and clinical proteinuria. Adapted from American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2002;25:S85-S89.
Effect of ACE Inhibition on Nephropathy in Type 1
Diabetes
* P=.006 vs placebo.* P=.006 vs placebo. Adapted from Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1456-1462.Adapted from Lewis EJ et al. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1456-1462.
Pro
gre
ssio
n t
o D
eath
, Dia
lysi
s,P
rog
ress
ion
to
Dea
th, D
ialy
sis,
or
Tra
nsp
lan
t (%
)o
r T
ran
spla
nt
(%)
CaptoprilCaptopril
PlaceboPlacebo
Follow-up (y)Follow-up (y)
00 11 22 33 4400
1010
2020
3030
4040
**
ACE Inhibitors and ARBs
• Captopril• Enanlapril• Lisinopril• Ramipril• Perindopril• Quinapril
LosartanIrbesartanCandesartanValsartanTelmisartanOlmesartan
Aliskiren
Proven role of Beta Blockers in Various Indications
- Hypertension
- Diabetes Mellitus
- CHF
- CAD
Kje
kshu
s J
et a
l. E
ur H
eart
J 1
990;
11:
43
-50
Effect of Beta-Blockers onmortality following myocardial infarction
Effect of Beta-Blockers onmortality following myocardial infarction
Diabetes mellitus, all
Diabetes mellitus,beta-blocker
No diabetes mellitus,no beta-blockerNo diabetes mellitus,beta-blocker
1 ye
ar-m
orta
lity
(%)
17
7
10
23
13
0
5
10
15
20
25
10
Diabetes mellitus,no beta-blocker
No diabetes mellitus, all
Jona
s et
al.
Am
J C
ardi
ol 1
996
; 77
: 12
73 e
t se
qq.
Usefulness of beta-blocker therapy in patients With Diabetes Mellitus and CAD (BIP)
Usefulness of beta-blocker therapy in patients With Diabetes Mellitus and CAD (BIP)
Year
Without ß-blockers
With
ß-blockers
P= 0.0001
1 2 3 4 50.75
0.80
0.85
0.90
0.95
1.00
Su
rviv
al r
ate
Effect of Beta-Blockers on Mortality in Heart Failure Patients
34% lower risk (0.53–0.81)P=0.0062 after adjusted interim analysis
MERIT-HF (metoprolol)
34% lower riskP< 0.0001
CIBIS-II (bisoprolol)
38% lower risk (18%-53%)P< 0.001
US Carvedilol
35% lower risk*COPERNICUS (carvedilol)
8.5% lower riskP=NS
BEST (bucindolol)
Clinical Trial
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Combined end point: risk of hospitalization or death
All-cause mortality
All-cause mortality
Trial End Point Risk Reduction, % (95% CI)
*Preliminary data from XXII Congress of the European Society of Cardiology
Effects of Metoprolol CR and Placebo on Neurohormonal Activation
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
250
225
200
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
165182
35.9 38.9
105
128
*147
99
30.9
113129
*34.3
Placebo Metoprolol
NS
Plasmarenin ng/ml
Angiotensin II pg/ml
Aldosterone pg/ml
Plasmarenin ng/ml
Angiotensin II pg/ml
Aldosterone pg/ml
Baseline
24 weeks
Baseline
24 weeks
*P<0.05NS: Non Significant
The Resolvd Investigators. 1999.
Mega-trials on: metoprolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol & bucindolol.
Consistent good results in mild / moderate HF.
Significant ↓ in rate of hospitalisation.
Fair improvements in symptoms & QOL.
Improvements in hemodynamics of HF & remodeling.
Results in severe HF are not uniform.
Bucindolol in BEST showed no benefits.
Sub-analysis of CIBIS-II (Bisoprolol) & MERIT-HF: ↓ benefits in more severe HF.
COPERNICUS: significant benefits in severe HF.
Effect of -Blocker in Heart Failure
Lipophilic beta blockers are an ideal choice in patients at
high risk of SCD, prior MI, HT,CHF
Beta Blockers
• Propranolol• Atenolol• Metoprolol( Sustained Release)• Bisoprolol• Carvedilol
DiureticsALLHAT
Because of the superiority of thiazide-type diuretics in preventing one or more major forms of CVD and their lower cost, they should be the drugs of choice for first-step antihypertensive drug therapy.
HydrochlorthiazideMetolazoneFurosemideTorsemideAmiloride
Calcium Channel Blockers
Very effective in lowering BP Safe OD or BID Dose No significant outcome benefits Peripheral edema
Nifedipine(Long Acting)AmlodepineVerapamilNicardepineLercanidipineFelodepine
Miscellaneous• Direct Vasodilators
– Dihydrallazine– Minoxidil– Prazosin
• Central Alpha Agonists– Clonidine– Moxolidine
• Aldosterone antagonists– Spironolactone– Eplerenone
• Indapamide
Benefits of Lowering BP
Average Percent Reduction
Stroke incidence 35–40%
Myocardial infarction 20–25%
Heart failure 50%
U.S. Department of Health and Human
Services
National Institutes of Health
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee onPrevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7)
The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee onPrevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC 7)
National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational High Blood Pressure Education Program
National Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational High Blood Pressure Education Program
Blood Pressure Classification
Normal <120 and <80
Prehypertension 120–139 or 80–89
Stage 1 Hypertension
140–159 or 90–99
Stage 2 Hypertension
>160 or >100
BP Classification SBP mmHg DBP mmHg
Compelling Indications for
Individual Drug ClassesCompelling Indication
Initial Therapy Clinical Trial BasisACC/AHA Heart Failure Guideline, MERIT-HF, COPERNICUS, CIBIS, SOLVD, AIRE, TRACE, ValHEFT, RALES
ACC/AHA Post-MI Guideline, BHAT, SAVE, Capricorn, EPHESUS
ALLHAT, HOPE, ANBP2, LIFE, CONVINCE
THIAZ, BB, ACEI, ARB, ALDO ANT
BB, ACEI, ALDO ANT
THIAZ, BB, ACE, CCB
Heart failure
Postmyocardialinfarction
High CAD risk
Diabetes
Chronic kidney disease
Recurrent stroke prevention
Compelling Indications for Individual Drug Classes
Compelling Indication
Initial Therapy Options
Clinical Trial BasisNKF-ADA Guideline, UKPDS, ALLHAT
NKF Guideline, Captopril Trial, RENAAL, IDNT, REIN, AASK
PROGRESS
THIAZ, BB, ACE, ARB,
CCB
ACEI, ARB
THIAZ, ACEI
Cardiovascular Diseases
• Cerebrovascular disease– Indication for treatment, except immediately
after ischemic cerebral infarction.
• Coronary artery disease–Benefits of therapy well established.
• Left ventricular hypertrophy–Antihypertensive agents (except direct
vasodilators) indicated.–Reduced weight and decreased sodium
intake beneficial.
Cardiovascular Diseases (continued)
• Cardiac failure–ACE inhibitors, especially with digoxin or
diuretics, shown to prevent subsequent heart failure.
• Peripheral arterial disease–Limited or no data available.
For persons over age 50, SBP is a more important than DBP as CVD risk factor
Starting at 115/75 mmHg, CVD risk doubles with each increment of 20/10 mmHg throughout the BP range.
Persons who are normotensive at age 55 have a 90% lifetime risk for developing HTN.
Those with SBP 120–139 mmHg or DBP 80–89 mmHg should be considered prehypertensive who require health-promoting lifestyle modifications to prevent CVD.
New Features and Key Messages
JNC-VII New Features and Key Messages (Continued)
Thiazide-type diuretics should be initial drug therapy for most, either alone or combined with other drug classes.
Certain high-risk conditions are compelling indications for other drug classes.
Most patients will require two or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve goal BP.
If BP is >20/10 mmHg above goal, initiate therapy with two agents, one usually should be a thiazide-type diuretic.
Preventable CHD Events from Control of Hypertension in US Adults
(Wong et al., Am Heart J 2003; 145: 888-95) (cont.)
• The greatest impact (absolute numbers) from control of hypertension occurs in men, older persons, and those with isolated systolic hypertension
• The greatest proportion of preventable CHD events from control of hypertension occurs in women
• Optimal control of blood pressure could prevent more than one third of CHD events in men and more than half of CHD events in women
Evolution of Antihypertensive Therapies
Directvasodilators
-blockers VPIs
OthersPeripheral
sympatholytics
Ganglion blockers
Veratrumalkaloids
Central 2 agonists
Calciumantagonists-
non DHPs
-blockers
Thiazidesdiuretics
Calciumantagonists-
DHPs
ARBs
1940’s 1950 1957 1960’s 1970’s 1980’s 1990’s 2001
ACEinhibitors
Effectiveness
Tolerability
We are still evolving towards finding an Ideal Antihypertensive
Preventable CHD Events from Control of Hypertension in US
Adults(Wong et al., Am Heart J 2003; 145: 888-95)
19
37
31
56
21
11
39
21
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
PA
R%
/ N
NT
Men PAR% Women PAR% Men NNT Women NNT
Treatment to <140/90 mmHg Treatment to <120/80 mmHg
PAR% = population attributable risk (proportion of CHD events preventable), NNT = number needed to treat to prevent 1 CHD event ; <0.01 comparing men and women for PAR%
Compelling Indications for Certain Drug Classes
HTN with CAD Beta blockers: cardioprotective
(reinfarction, arrhythmias and sudden death)
ACE inhibitors: MI with systolic dysfunction- heart failure and mortality improved
Aliskiren is a novel, completely nonpeptide, orally active renin inhibitor that blocks the first and rate-limiting step of the renin-angiotensin system
Alagebrium, an advanced glycation end product (AGE) crosslink breaker, has been shown to reduce SBP in patients with uncontrolled systolic hypertension,
progestin drospirenone and 17beta-estradiol (DRSP/E2), developed for postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy, has been shown to lower both clinic and ambulatory SBP in postmenopausal women
Adapted from: Eichhorn EJ, Bristow MR. Circulation. 1996;94:2285-2296.
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cell death
Altered gene expression
Growth and remodeling
Ischemia and energy depletion
Activation of RAA System, SNS, and cytokines
Increased load
Cardiac injury
Direct toxicity
Apoptosis Necrosis
Reduced systemic perfusion
Pathogenesis of HT
Reasons are
mulitfactorial..
Renin
Angiotensin II Angiotensin I
Increased Na+ & water reabsorption
Vasoconstriction
Summary