new refuse contract discussion
DESCRIPTION
NEW REFUSE CONTRACT DISCUSSION. October 1, 2013 Erik Grabowsky Department of Environmental Services Solid Waste Bureau. Participation Leadership and Civic Engagement (PLACE). The Opportunity. Bates refuse contract expires on June 30, 2014 : Routes 1,2,3,9,10 - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
NEW REFUSE CONTRACTDISCUSSION
October 1, 2013
Erik Grabowsky
Department of Environmental Services
Solid Waste Bureau
Participation Leadership and Civic Engagement (PLACE)
2
The Opportunity
Bates refuse contract expires on June 30, 2014: Routes 1,2,3,9,10
kmG refuse contract expires on June 30, 2014: Routes 4,5,6,7,8
3
Background on the County’s Integrated Solid Waste Management System
• In 2004 the County Board adopted the Solid Waste Management Plan (SWMP). This 20-year planning document laid the foundation for the continued enhancement of the County’s solid waste management system and presented a plan for further development of the County’s solid waste services.
• SWMP states, “Arlington County wants to be a leader in solid waste reduction and recycling in the Commonwealth.”
• The SWMP outlines the introduction of year-round yard waste and food waste collection to the already comprehensive list of services provided.
• The 2004 SWMP’s goals for the County’s recycling rate are:– 37% by 2014– 42% by 2019– 47% by 2024
• The Solid Waste Committee’s proposed revisions to the recycling rate goals:– 50% by 2015– 55% by 2020– 60 % by 2025
4
Integrated Solid Waste Management System
MRF – Materials Recovery Facility EPRY – Earth Products Recycling Yard WTE – Waste to Energy
Product Stewardship
Change in Package
Design/ProductManufacturing
Change in Purchasing
Habits
Change in Donation/
Reuse Habits
Improve RecyclingParticipation & Generation
Consumer Purchase Source Reduction
Was
te R
educ
tion
Consumer Diversion
Municipal Solid WasteMinimize Disposal
Domestic/InternationalProduction
(Manufacturing & Packaging)
WTE(Residuals)
Landfill Ash(Monofill)
WTE(Recovery
for Combustion)
EPRYLeaves, Brush
Inert Materials
TrashDisposal
Recovery for Recycling
Expanded recyclingmaterials as tech.
improves
100% reuse of materials generated
within the County
CompostingGrasscycling Reuse
E-WasteComputersTelevisionsElectronics
MRFPlastics, Metal
Paper, Glass
Landfill(Residuals)
Curbside RecyclingProgram
Landfill Ash(Monofill)
Ferrous MetalRecovery
Ferrous Metal RecoveryMunicipal Solid Waste
CompostingYard Waste
Food WasteMetal
White goodsMetal items
Household Solid Waste Rate
• Refuse collection• Refuse disposal• Recycling collection• Brush collection• Metal/white goods
collection• Electronics Collection• Battery collection
• Backdoor collection• Spring yard waste collection• Leaf collection• Refuse/recycling carts• Earth products recycling
yard• Call center• Administration
6
FY14 = $293.76
Regional HSWRs
7City of A
lexandria
Arlington County*
City of F
airfax
Fairf
ax County*
City of F
alls Church
*
Prince
George's County
$0.00$50.00
$100.00$150.00$200.00$250.00$300.00$350.00$400.00 $336.00
$293.92$355.48 $345.00 $345.00 $334.82
FY12/13 Annual Rate
*FY13 Rates
FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14$0.00
$50.00
$100.00
$150.00
$200.00
$250.00
$300.00
$350.00
$400.00
-20.00%
-15.00%
-10.00%
-5.00%
0.00%
5.00%
10.00%
15.00%
20.00%
$260.36$295.80$306.56
$325.68$344.24
$325.72$293.92$293.76
14%
4%6% 6%
-5%
-15%
0%
HSWR
HSWRHSWR % change
JurisdictionYear-Round Yard Waste
Program
VirginiaCity of Alexandria NoArlington County NoCity of Fairfax YesFairfax County YesCity of Falls Church YesTown of Leesburg Yes
MarylandCity of Bowie NoCity of College Park YesCity of Frederick YesFrederick County YesMontgomery County YesPrince George's County Yes
2012 Waste Audit ResultsResidential Refuse Toter Contents
8
RecyclablesNot Diverted
16.5%
MixedWastes24.2%
Yard Waste35.8%
Food Waste& Soiled Paper
23.5%
Note: Average of 4 waste audits in 2012 totaling 9,988 pounds or almost 5 tons of curbside refuse.
Organics Management Today
• Promote grasscycling and composting
• Yard Waste - Recycled into Mulch- Weekly curbside brush collection- Leaf Collection: November-January- Spring Yard Waste: March-April
• Food Waste - Trash
9
Urban Agriculture Task Force Report
• 9 Recommended Priorities– D. Implement an environmentally sound and
effective food waste and recycling system while increasing healthy soils.
• 9. Initiate a municipal composting system to ensure an effective and ecologically appropriate disposal, reuse, and recycling system for food scraps, yard waste and other organic materials.
10
Recycling Rate Impacts
11
10% 25% 33% 50% 75% 100%45%
50%
55%
60%
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
52.1%54.8%
56.2%59.2%
63.7%
68.1%
53.3%
57.7%60.1%
65.1%
72.4%
79.8%
Potential Residential Recycling Rate with Organics Diversion(2012 Residential Recycle Rate = 50.3%)
Yard Waste Only
Yard Waste & Food Waste (SSO)
Additional Diversion of Organics from MSW Stream
Estim
ated
Rec
yclin
g R
ate
CY03 CY04 CY05 CY06* CY07* CY08* CY09 CY10 CY11 CY12
Residential 34.3% 34.8% 36.6% 37.3% 41.3% 42.0% 44.3% 48.0% 50.2% 50.3%
CY03 CY04 CY05 CY06* CY07* CY08* CY09 CY10 CY11 CY12
Residential 34.3% 34.8% 36.6% 37.3% 41.3% 42.0% 44.3% 48.0% 50.2% 50.3%
12
Composting Facilities nearArlington County
Greenhouse Gas Impacts
The EPA Waste Reduction Model (WARM) shows that taking organic waste to a composting facility generates less GHG emissions than taking it to the WTE/incinerator.
13
*Based on EPA WARM model results for 12,953 tons of yard waste and 21,455 tons of single-stream organics (SSO). MTCO2E=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent; MTCE=metric tons carbon equivalent
YARD WASTE YARD & FOOD WASTE (SSO)
to Loudoun Composting
Loudoun County, VAto PG Co. Compost Facility
Prince George's County, MD
GHG Emissions (MTCO2E) -375 -1008
GHG Emissions (MTCE) -102 -275
GHG Savings from 100% Diversion of Residential Organics from WTE*:
For YARD WASTE, this is equivalent to…• Removing annual emissions from 74 Passenger Vehicles• Conserving 42,074 Gallons of Gasoline• Conserving 15,637 Cylinders of Propane Used for Home Barbeques• Conserving 2 Railway Cars of Coal
For YARD WASTE and FOOD WASTE, this is equivalent to…• Removing annual emissions from 198 Passenger Vehicles• Conserving 112,954 Gallons of Gasoline• Conserving 41,981 Cylinders of Propane Used for Home Barbeques• Conserving 5 Railway Cars of Coal
Organic Waste Program Options
1. Bag System: – Self Purchased– County Provided
2. Cart System
3. Bag & Cart Option-Bags now for yard waste and add 3rd cart when food waste collection is implemented
14
Yard waste = leaves, grass, weeds, brush, plants, shrubs, branches
What the Community is Telling Us(Survey Data)
• 496 survey responses
• Which of the following program and operational changes for the county’s Solid Waste Management System would you support?
– Additional curbside yard waste and food waste pickup in the same cart, 70.1%, 337 responses
– Additional curbside yard waste pickup only , 23.5%, 113 responses
– Additional curbside food waste pickup only, 6.4%, 31 responses
15
http://www.peakdemocracy.com/p/105 We've developed a brief informational presentation and a quick survey to find out if, and how, Arlington residents would like to see their curb-side recycling services expanded
In House Management Options
16
17
Three Cart Option
The future could look like this . . .
Budget Decision
• RFP process will move forward.• Negotiated RFP pricing and programs will be
evaluated as part of the budget process. Staff will make a recommendation.
• County Manager will consider options as part of her budget proposal.
• County Board will adopt budget.
18
Questions
19
Thank You!
20