new particles from belle
DESCRIPTION
New Particles from Belle. S. L. Olsen ( U. of Hawaii). GHP 2004 Fermilab, October, 2004. B-factory bonuses:. new insights/puzzles in charm/charmonium spectroscopy. B K K s Kp. h c ’. B K p + p - J/ y. X(3872). M(K s K p ). M( p + p - J/ y). e + e - J/ y cc. B K w J/ y. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
New Particles from BelleNew Particles from Belle
S. L. OlsenS. L. Olsen((U. of Hawaii)U. of Hawaii)
GHP 2004 Fermilab,GHP 2004 Fermilab, October, 2004October, 2004
![Page 2: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
B-factory bonuses:
new insights/puzzles in charm/charmonium
spectroscopy
c’
X(3872)
M(KsK)
BK Ks
BK +-J/
M(+-J/
ccc0
J/recoil mass
e+e-J/cc
??‘
BK J/
M(J/
??
![Page 3: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
bccs is a dominant process
b
c
c
s
Vcb
cosC
J/, ’, c, c1,…
Brs~10-2
(inclusive)
CKMfavored
W-
B mesons are a good source for charm charmonium and other cc states
![Page 4: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
>900pb-1/day(~1M BBs/day)
1.2x1034/cm2/s
KEKB is a good source of Bs
![Page 5: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
![Page 6: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Kinematic variables for the (4S)
CM energy difference:
Beam-constrained mass:
22 )()2( 'c
ppEm KCMbc
BK c
BKc
2/' cmK EEEEc
B
Bϒ(4S)
Ecm/2
e e
Ecm/2
KSK
KSK
Mbc
E
![Page 7: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
1st Observation of the c‘
![Page 8: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
BK (KSK±Ŧ)Mbc for 40 MeV M(KSK) slices
3000 MeV
3640 MeV
BK c
BK c’42fb-1
KSK
KSK
![Page 9: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Fit each bin
Nevt = 45.3 ± 12.6 Mc’ = 3653 ± 10 MeV
c’ = 33 ± 22 MeV
Nevt = 90.5 ± 14.9 Mc = 2978 ± 5MeV
c = 33 ± 16 MeV M(KSK)
Mbc E
c:
c’:3.55 GeV
3.60 GeV
3.65 GeV
3.70 GeV
3.75 GeV
…
…
![Page 10: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Subsequent measurementsconfirm higher mass value
KSK
KSK
eeJ/X
Mx
BaBar(preliminary)
3630 MeV
3642 MeV
3633 MeV
CLEOhep-ex/0306060
elle
c c‘
![Page 11: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
c’: current status
Mavg =3637±4 MeV(Crystal Ball excluded)
M(1S) = MJ/ – Mc = 117±1 MeV
M(2S) = 49 ± 4 MeV
smaller
![Page 12: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
The X(3872) with 253 fb-1
![Page 13: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
B±K±+-J/ (275M (4S)BB decays)
Nev = 48.6 ± 7.8M = 3872.4 ± 0.7 MeV(width consistent with resol)
Mbc for 5 MeV M(J/) bins
![Page 14: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Now M( is really -like
background estimated from Mbc-E sidebands
![Page 15: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Confirmed by CDF & D0
PRL 93, 262001(2003) hep-ex/031202
X(3872) X(3872)
CDF D0
hep-ex/0405004
![Page 16: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
3.5 σ effect
also seen by BaBar
M=3873.4 ± 1.4 MeVB(BKX)B(XJ/) = (1.28± 0.24) x 105
Belle (1.3± 0.3) x 10-5
hep-ex/0406022
![Page 17: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
X(3872) Mass
D+D*- threshold
(Plot from Soon Yun Jun’s FPCP04 CDF hot topics talk)
![Page 18: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Charmonium possibilities
J/c
c’ ’
”
hc
c0c1
c2
c”
hc’c1’
c2
2 3
cc level spectrum
3872 MeVMD+ MD*
2MD
![Page 19: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
No obvious cc candidates for X(3872)
c”
hc’
c1’
2
c2
3
M too low; too small
c should dominateJ/
J/ decays violate isospin
angular dist’n rules out 1
M too low;J/ too small
c too small; m wrong
c& DD) too small; m wrong
![Page 20: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Look at BK J/
![Page 21: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
M()
M(J
/ )
BK J/
XJ/ BK X(3872);
![Page 22: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
1: look at BK J/Dalitz Plot
M
Mbc
EM
2(J
/
)
M2(K)
BK* J/K
cut here
![Page 23: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Slice into 40 MeV-wide M(J/) bins
Large deviationfrom phase-space
Fit
![Page 24: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Slice into 40 MeV-wide M(J/) bins
Adding a BWhelps
FitM≈3940 ± 11 MeV≈ 92 ± 24 MeV
![Page 25: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
M(K) for the signal region
M(K) (GeV)
3880 <M(J/)<3900 MeV
No peakingIn M(K)
![Page 26: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Look back at the masses
76’s28’s
Very clear signal
20’s26’s
![Page 27: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
What is it? Charmonium?Charmonium?
– Conventional wisdom: J/ should not be a discovery mode for a cc state with mass above DD & DD* threshold!
Some kind of Some kind of -J/-J/ threshold interaction threshold interaction??
– the J/ is not surrounded by brown muck; can it act like an ordinary hadron?
cc-gluon hybrid?cc-gluon hybrid?– Predicted by lattice QCD, including states with large hadron+cc widths,
but the masses are predicted to be 4.3 ~ 4.4 GeV
J/
![Page 28: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Evidence for X3872K J/
![Page 29: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
M(J/) vs M() revisited
M()
M(J
/ )
BK X(3872)
J/
look along here
![Page 30: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
M(3 J/) = MX(3872) ± 16.5 MeV(±3)
Look at 25 MeV-wide M() mass bins
E Mbc
![Page 31: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
B-meson yields vs M()
12.4 ± 4.2 evts
![Page 32: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
“Sidebands”
BKJ/Non-resonant
or “peaking bkgdsidebands
Overlapregion
![Page 33: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Cross-talk from BKJ/enhancement?
f dm = 0.75 ±0.14 evts
Check : signal yield for M(3 J/)= M X(3872) +1–3(no overlap with band) 12.4 evts 11.5 evts (expect 11.0 for no X-talk)
![Page 34: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Other sidebands(no significant signals)
4.3 ±6.2 evts
6.4 ± 5.6 evts
Area of I and III each= 4x Area of signal bin
Non-res bkd in signal bin = 1.3 ± 1.0 evts
![Page 35: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
M(K3) for signal bin
![Page 36: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Branching fraction
Br(X J/)Br(XJ/)
Nev( J/) (2J/)Nev(J/)(3J/)
=
0.188
0.036
12.4 ± 4.2
62.6 ± 8.3
= 1.1 ± 0.4 (stat) ± 0.3 (syst)
Accept:ance: 10%Xtalk/Bkgnd: -20%X J/: +25%M(3)<750 MeV
significance ≈ 4
![Page 37: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Consistent with sub-threshold X(3872) J/
MM + M + MJ/J/ = 3879 MeV (7 MeV above 3872) = 3879 MeV (7 MeV above 3872)
– X J/ occur via virtual ’s, 3 masses cluster at the kinematic limit.
(X(XJ/J/)/)/(X(X J/ J/) = 1.1±0.4 ± 0.3) = 1.1±0.4 ± 0.3
In agreement with Swanson’s DD* bound-state model for the In agreement with Swanson’s DD* bound-state model for the X(3872)X(3872) [PLB 588,189 (2004)][PLB 588,189 (2004)]
Smoking gun for qqqq interpretation of X(3872)?Smoking gun for qqqq interpretation of X(3872)?
- -
![Page 38: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
continuum e+e-J/ (cc) with 287 fb-1
Details in Tom Ziegler’s talk in session B3Sunday, Snakepit 5:08PM
![Page 39: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
L=101 fb-1
2002L=155 fb-
1
2003
287 fb -1
c c0
‘c
4th peak!!non-zero continuumbelow DD threshold
• J/ J/ negligible
• confirm c’
• e+e-J/ (cc) > e+e-J/ glue
• (e+e-J/ c) > 10x theory
• evidence for c’ 2004
-
![Page 40: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
What is the 4th peak?the reconstruction and selection procedure is the same the reconstruction and selection procedure is the same as beforeas before
Extend the fit regionExtend the fit region
no signal of X(3872)significant (>4) peak at M=3940 11 MeVN=14833 (4.5)the width is consistent w/ resolution (= 32 MeV)
X(3872)
c
c
c0
c‘
‘
What is it? c0? c ??‘ “
![Page 41: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Look at e+e-J/ D(D(*))
•Reconstruct a J/ & a D•use D0K-+ & D+K-++
•Determine recoil mass
![Page 42: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Look at M(DD(*))
DD*
DD
3940 MeV
9.9 ± 3.3 evts(4.5 )
4.1 ± 2.2 evts(2.1 )
c0 DD*‘
c DD“
![Page 43: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
What is this one?
Is it too narrow to be the same as the Is it too narrow to be the same as the J/J/ peak at 3940 MeV??? peak at 3940 MeV??? under investigationunder investigation– We are looking for J/ recoiling from a J/ in the continuum
– & BK “Y(3940)”; “Y(3940)”DD*
c0c0 or or cc most likely charmonium states most likely charmonium states
– DD* signal rules against c0
– Mass is a little low for c
• M(3S) would be ≈ 100MeV
• can M(3S) > M(2S)?
‘ “
“‘
![Page 44: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
JP of the DsJ(2317) and DsJ(2457) from BDsJD decays
Details in Alexey Drutskoy’s talk in session C1Monday, 1-West 2:36PM
![Page 45: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
DsJ(2317) Ds*0
DsJ(2317) Ds0
DsJ(2317) and DsJ(2457)
BaBar - DsJ(2317) CLEO
DSJ(2317)
DSJ(2457)
KKDS
0 KKDS
Masses are significantly lower than potential model P-level predictions - speculations about 4-quark, DK-molecule and Dsπ atom, csghybrid…
DSJ(2317)
M(Ds0)
M(Ds0)
M(Ds*0)
![Page 46: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
DsJ(2317)Ds0
DsJ(2460) Ds* 0
DsJ(2460)D s
BelleDSJ(2317)
DSJ(2457)
DSJ(2457)
DsJ properties are consistent with two lowerst P-level states
DsJ(2457) consistent with JP=1+ DsJ(2317) consistent with 0+ No Ds0 decay rules out 0+,1- Flat decay angle distribution Ds decay rules out 0+,0- No Ds+ - and Ds decays Helicity in BD DsJ(2457) prefer J=1
J=1
J=2
J=1
J=0
DsJ(2317) Ds0
DsJ(2460) Ds
DSJ(2317)
DSJ(2457)
B D DsJ(2317) (and DsJ(2457))
![Page 47: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Summary
cc’ established ’ established M(2S) < M(2S) < M(1S) M(1S) (as expected)(as expected)
(X(3872)(X(3872)J/J/ ≈ ≈ (X(3872) (X(3872) J/J/))– good for molecules; bad for charmonium
Broad near-threshold Broad near-threshold J/J/ peak at 3940 MeV peak at 3940 MeV– too broad for charmonium– too light for cc-glue hybrid?– threshold interaction involving a J/ ?
Narrow(?) peak at 3940 in e+e- Narrow(?) peak at 3940 in e+e- J/J/ X recoils X recoils– May be too narrow to be the J/ state seen in B decays– seen in DD* (rules out c0’)– mass too low to be thec”
DDsJsJ consistent with J consistent with Jpp=0=0++ for D for DsJsJ(2317) (2317) and Jand Jpp=1=1++ for D for DsJsJ(2457)(2457)
![Page 48: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Backup Slides
![Page 49: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Other results on the X(3872) - Look for X(3872)c2 ( c2
- J/- J/ helicity angle dist inconsistent with J helicity angle dist inconsistent with JPCPC = 1 = 1
- rules out X=21P1 (hc’)
Mbc Mc2
X
2=75/9
|cosJ/
(Xc2)(XJ)
<1.1
- Contrary to expectations for charmonium 3D3
expect: dNdcosJ/
sin2
![Page 50: New Particles from Belle](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022051316/5681401c550346895dab7279/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
BKc1; c1J/
no X(3872)Br(XJ/)
Br(XJ/) <0.4
Probably not the c1’
M( J/)-M(J/)
90% CL upper limit:
BK J/
Other new results on the X(3872), cont’d