new jersey division of investment - the … · new jersey division of investment ... 2017 state...
TRANSCRIPT
NEW JERSEY DIVISION OF
INVESTMENT
Review of IPC’s Asset Allocation Discussion
May 24, 2017
State Investment Council Meeting
The following slides summarize the
Investment Policy Committee (IPC)
discussion held on April 19, 2017
regarding asset allocation.
Agenda Item 4
2 2
Executive Summary: Current Investment Themes and Tactical Asset Allocation
• The Pension Fund has benefitted from increased allocations to Global Growth over the past six years• U.S. Equities remain the highest targeted allocation (30%) within the Fund as the S&P 1500 has realized an annualized return
of 13% since the start of FY11
• Following a period of strong returns driven by higher valuations and extraordinary monetary policy, the Division may tilt the Fund in favor of more conservative asset classes relative to the targeted AA
• valuations for U.S. Equities have reached their highest levels of the past decade and appear to be discounting strong earnings growth and fiscal stimulus, at the same time certain risks appear to be deemphasized
• while longer-term return prospects for fixed income are constrained by still low yields, the move to higher yields over the past nine months provides somewhat more attractive income prospects for an asset class with favorable defensive characteristics
• quarterly pension payments and an improved cash flow outlook for the Fund also favors fixed income relative to an allocation to cash where the return prospects are more modest
• The Division expects to maintain a pronounced home country bias within global equities, but may tilt the allocation somewhat in favor of non-U.S. equities relative to the targeted AA
• Non-U.S. equity valuations are viewed more constructively, particularly in light of more favorable earnings and economic growth potential within EM and an extended period of policy accommodation within DM
• any tilt would likely be modest, as risks remain elevated ahead of Brexit negotiations, continued pressure on the EU institution, elections in Germany, further deleveraging, and the eventual tapering of ECB monetary policy
• Notwithstanding higher valuations and strong returns, Private Equity and Real Estate remain attractive on a longer-term risk-return basis
• However, the pace of commitments should slow based on pacing model, and the current market environment
• Consistent with the FY17 Investment Plan, the Division is recommending modest adjustments to the Policy Benchmark for FY18 that reflect the ongoing implementation of the targeted asset allocation
• the changes would reflect ongoing hedge fund redemptions and a move towards the targeted allocation• the Policy Benchmark weight to U.S. Equities would increase from 28% to 29%, offset by a 1% decline in the weight to Equity-
oriented HF• the Policy Benchmark weight to IG Credit would increase from 9% to 9.5%, offset by a 0.5% decline in the weight to Credit-
oriented HF
Hedge Fund Program Redemption Update
3
Redemptions for the Hedge Fund Program remain on track to meet the allocation target of 6% by Calendar
Year End 2018. Progress in reducing the overall allocation to hedge funds supports a reduction in the weight
of hedge funds for the FY18 Policy Benchmark in favor of U.S. Equities and Investment Grade Credit.
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
8.00%
10.00%
12.00%
Sep-16 Dec-16 Mar-17 Jun-17 (Projected) Dec-17 (Projected) Jun-18 (Projected) Dec-18 (Projected)
New Jersey Hedge Fund Allocation
Absolute Return Hedge Funds Credit-Oriented Hedge Funds Equity-Oriented Hedge Funds
The HF Program is projected
to reach its targeted
allocation (6%) by the end of
2018
Forward S&P 500 Valuations and Subsequent Five Year Returns – March 1990 to present
-5
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27
5 Y
ear
Retu
rn (
% A
nn
ua
lized
)
Forward P/E
The S&P 500’s Forward P/E
(measured quarterly) has been
higher than the current level twenty
times since March 1990. Over the
subsequent five-year period , the
average return was 0.85%.
The S&P 500’s Forward P/E
(measured quarterly) has been
lower than the current level sixty-
four times since March 1990. Over
the subsequent five-year period, the
average return was 12.05%.
Equity valuations have an important impact on forward-looking returns.
Higher beginning valuations tend to subsequently lead to subdued equity market returns.
Forward P/E
as of
12/31/16
Source: Bloomberg
4
5
U.S. Equity Market Is Pricing in Expectations For Favorable EPS Growth
While forward U.S. Equity EPS estimates suggest favorable growth,
current valuations in the marketplace remain high
Consensus estimates for S&P 500 EPS
suggest that earnings will grow at an
annualized pace of 11% in 2017 and
2018. From the 2009 low through 2016,
EPS grew, on average, 9.8% per year.
Over the same horizon, nominal GDP
expanded 3.2% per year.
While the forward PE multiple for the
S&P 500 currently appears stretched,
valuations are somewhat more
reasonable in light of current EPS
growth expectations. The market may
be discounting higher earnings
prospects ahead of proposed tax
reform, deregulation and repatriation.
U.S. Equity Valuations Appear High in Historical Context
Source: FactSet
S&P 500 Earnings
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
Mar-97 Mar-01 Mar-05 Mar-09 Mar-13 Mar-17
Price /
Ea
rnin
gs M
ultip
le (
X)
S&P 500 Forward P/E Ten Yr Avg Twenty Yr Avg
The S&P 500 recently traded at its highest
forward looking multiple since 2002
39.32
50.3446.70 45.49
51.77
56.78
47.4950.48
55.22
68.84
78.56
90.0887.48
73.74
62.02
87.10
98.97
105.25
111.36
118.96118.60 119.15
131.24
146.73
160.74
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
S&
P 5
00
EP
S
6
Non-U.S. Developed Markets and Emerging Markets: Earnings and Valuation
Forward earnings expectations in Europe, the Far East and in Emerging Markets suggest a
sharp rebound following an extended period of declining earnings. Current valuations appear
somewhat more reasonable in the context of strong earnings growth expectations.
EAFE Price / Earnings Multiple
Source: FactSet
EAFE Earnings
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
Mar-97 Mar-01 Mar-05 Mar-09 Mar-13 Mar-17
Price /
Earn
ings M
ultip
le (
X)
EAFE Forward P/E Ten Yr Avg Twenty Yr Avg
52.59 54.1249.98
60.48
45.39
52.01
73.38
98.71
110.17
136.13
162.13
97.90
82.02
126.57
119.47
111.99
121.67
111.54
105.57102.71
118.82
129.10
139.13
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
MS
CI E
AF
E E
PS
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
Oct-99 Oct-03 Oct-07 Oct-11 Oct-15
Price /
Earn
ings M
ultip
le (
X)
EM Forward P/E Ten Yr Avg Seventeen Yr Avg
34.57
22.01 21.26
24.54
32.53
49.88
55.6857.61
71.67
50.56
59.42
85.82
91.61
85.3183.48
74.46
60.02
64.25
76.39
85.03
94.68
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E
MS
CI E
M E
PS
Emerging Markets Price / Earnings MultipleEmerging Markets Earnings
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
5 Y
ear
Retu
rn (
% A
nnualiz
ed)
Beginning Yield (%)
Bloomberg Barclays Agg Beginning Yields and Subsequent Five Year Returns – March 1976 to present
From 1976 through 2012, there
were 4 quarter end periods with
lower beginning bond yields versus
today. The highest subsequent five
year return was 3.1%
Analysis of historical returns suggests beginning yield is a good predictor of long-term returns.
Lower beginning yields may portend subdued fixed income market returns.
Yield as of
03/31/17
Source: Bloomberg
7
8
A Recent Backup in Bond Yields Makes Fixed Income Somewhat More Tactically Attractive
Source: Bloomberg
-4
-2
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
Feb-62 Feb-66 Feb-70 Feb-74 Feb-78 Feb-82 Feb-86 Feb-90 Feb-94 Feb-98 Feb-02 Feb-06 Feb-10 Feb-14
Yie
ld a
nd
Re
turn
(%
)
Ten Year U.S. Treasury Yield Next Ten Years Realized Real Return
Bond yields
remain near all-
time lows
Over longer-term time periods, ten-year Treasuries
have realized an average real return of 2¾%
Global Sovereign Yield Curve Comparisons
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
De
fau
lt R
ate
Op
tio
n A
dju
ste
d S
pre
ad
(O
AS
) in
bp
s
Default Rate (RHS) HY OAS (LHS) Long Term Avg OAS
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Jun-89 Jun-92 Jun-95 Jun-98 Jun-01 Jun-04 Jun-07 Jun-10 Jun-13 Jun-1620%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
Option A
dju
ste
d S
pre
ad (
OA
S)
in b
ps
BB
B a
s %
of Tota
l C
redit I
ndex
BBB as % of U.S. Credit Index (RHS) OAS U.S. Credit Index (LHS) Long Term Avg OAS
While absolute
yields remain
low, U.S. yields
are higher vs.
most sovereign
issuers
Yield seeking investors
have moved credit
spreads lower at the
same time that the credit
profile of the market is
weakening over time
HY spreads have
narrowed while
default rates have
moved higher
While bond yields remain low in an historical context, rates are somewhat more attractive vs a year ago. Tighter credit
spreads have tempered a move to higher Treasury yields at the same time that fundamentals are weakening.
IG Credit Spreads and Creditworthiness
Ten Year Treasury Yields and Real Returns
HY Credit Spreads and Creditworthiness
(800,000,000)
(600,000,000)
(400,000,000)
(200,000,000)
0
200,000,000
400,000,000
600,000,000
800,000,000
Net CF Contributions Distributions
(2,000)
(1,000)
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Net Cash Flow Capital Commitments with NJ discretion
9 9
Private Equity: Update on NJ Portfolio
NJ Private Equity Portfolio Cash Flows
Source: RV Kuhns, State Street, and TorreyCove
Private Equity Pacing Analysis$ (millions)
(500,000,000)
(400,000,000)
(300,000,000)
(200,000,000)
(100,000,000)
-
100,000,000
200,000,000
300,000,000
400,000,000
500,000,000
600,000,000
Net CF Contributions Distributions
NJ Real Estate Portfolio Cash Flows
(1,000)
(500)
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E 2021E 2022E 2023E 2024E
Net Cash Flow Capital Commitments with NJ discretion
Real Estate Pacing Analysis
The NJ allocation to Private Equity and Real Estate are both expected to gradually move towards
their respective TAAs as net distributions remain positive and the pace of new commitments slows
$ (millions)
10
Current and Secular Investment Themes: Implications for Asset Allocation
Risk Mitigation
• downside protection and less
correlated returns of risk mitigating
strategies are attractive in light of
high valuations in equity and fixed
income markets and escalating
geopolitical risk
• central bank policy divergence and
currency and commodity price
instability create higher capital
market volatility which present
trading opportunities for global
macro and relative value strategies
Liquidity
• more manageable projected cash
needs based on higher projected cash
inflows support a more moderate cash
allocation
• U.S. Government bond yields have
moved off their lows and are expected
move gradually higher over longer term
• lack of compelling opportunities in
other asset classes based on
valuations and fundamentals may lead
to slight overweight to government
bonds when excess cash is available
Income
• tightening spreads have lead to higher
valuation in credit markets at the same
time fundamentals have been
weakening
• allocations to investment grade and high
yield credit are expected to be at or
below the target allocation
• private credit markets investors continue
to provide investors with the ability to
lock up capital the opportunity to
generate outsized returns
Real Return
• real estate capitalization rates are near or
below pre-crisis lows
• Fundamentals remain strong across most
market segments, providing support for low
cap rates
• more defensive real estate sectors provide
the most attractive opportunities in the
current environment
• significant dry powder available in the real
estate market suggests a modest pacing
approach is warranted
Global Growth
• U.S. equity market valuations appear stretched relative to historical standards
absent significant earnings growth, perhaps driven by tax and/or regulatory
reform
• non-U.S. markets appear more reasonably valued relative to the US at the same
time as earnings growth appears to be accelerating
• non-U.S. markets are subject to greater geopolitical risk
• a conservative approach to a private equity vintage year diversification strategy
emphasizing value-based managers with a disciplined buy and sell track record
and less dependence on leverage is appropriate in environment characterized by
high multiples
Market Outlook By Asset Class and Recommendation for FY18 Policy Benchmark
11
Asset ClassCurrent
Allocation
Target
Allocation
Long Term
Target RangeCurrent View Relative to Target Allocation
FY 2017
Benchmark
Weight
Recommended
FY 2018
Benchmark
Weight
RISK MITIGATION 4.26% 5.00% 0-10% 5.00% 5.00%
Absolute Return HFs and
Risk Mitigation Hedging4.26% 5.00% 0-10%
Meaningful allocation to Risk Mitigating strategies warranted given high valuations
and increased geopolitical risk. Continue migration of program to FAIR mandate.5.00% 5.00%
LIQUIDITY 8.19% 8.50% 2-15% 8.50% 8.50%
Cash and Cash Equivalents 5.90% 5.50% 0-15%Cash flow projections suggest a more moderate cash allocation is warranted. Likely
to maintain below target allocation all else equal5.50% 5.50%
US Gov't Bonds 2.29% 3.00% 0-10%
Lack of compelling opportunities in other asset classes based on valuations and
fundamentals may lead to slight overweight to government bonds when excess cash
is available
3.00% 3.00%
INCOME 20.62% 21.50% 15-40% 21.50% 21.50%
Investment Grade Credit 9.70% 10.00% 5-20% Allocation to move toward target as credit hedge fund redemptions are received 9.00% 9.50%
High Yield 2.07% 2.50% 0-8% Fundamentals suggest a modest underweight is warranted 2.50% 2.50%
Global Diversified Credit 4.62% 5.00% 0-7% Allocation will move towards target as prior commitments are funded over time 5.00% 5.00%
Credit-Oriented HFs 2.69% 1.00% 0-6% Allocation will be reduced towards target as redemptions are realized 2.00% 1.50%
Debt-Related PE 0.95% 2.00% 0-4% Expected to be area of focus in 2017/2018 to move allocation towards target 2.00% 2.00%
Debt Related Real Estate 0.59% 1.00% 0-4%Conservative pacing expected moving forward. Allocation will move towards target
as prior commitments are funded.1.00% 1.00%
REAL RETURN 8.14% 8.75% 3-12% 8.75% 8.75%
Private Real Assets 2.58% 2.50% 0-7%Pacing suggests allocation will remain near target based on prior year and expected
future commitments2.50% 2.50%
Equity Related Real Estate 5.31% 6.25% 2-9%Conservative pacing expected moving forward. Allocation will move towards target
as prior commitments are funded.6.25% 6.25%
GLOBAL GROWTH 57.93% 56.25% 45-65% 56.25% 56.25%
US Equity 29.26% 30.00% 15-35% 28.00% 29.00%
Non-US Dev Market Eq 11.36% 11.50% 8-20% 11.50% 11.50%
Emerging Market Eq 6.52% 6.50% 5-15% 6.50% 6.50%
Buyouts/Venture Cap 9.26% 8.25% 4-12%Conservative pacing expected moving forward. Allocation will move towards target
over time.8.25% 8.25%
Equity-Oriented HFs 1.53% 0.00% 0-8% Allocation will be eliminated as redemptions are realized 2.00% 1.00%
High valuations suggest caution for overall global equity allocation. On a relative
perspective, Non-US markets appear more attractive. Preference is for equal to
small underweight in U.S. offset by small overweight to Non-U.S. markets