new jersey arsenic water quality standards variance ... · new jersey arsenic water quality...
TRANSCRIPT
NEW JERSEY
Arsenic Water Quality Standards
Variance Workgroup Meeting09/28/2017
Department of Environmental Protection
Division of Water Monitoring and Standards
Bureau of Environmental Analysis, Restoration and Standards
Agenda
➢ Why arsenic variance?
➢ What is water quality standards variance
(WQSV)?
➢ NJ’s proposed approach
➢ Workgroup
Goal – Streamlined variance approach
➢ Discussion
➢ Future meetings – Assignments,
schedules etc.
Arsenic – Why do we need variance?
Human Health Criterion = 0.017 µg/L (based on fish and drinking water consumption) in Fresh waters and 0.061 µg/L in Saline waters
• No approved technology for measuring to, or treat to the criteria
• Drinking water MCL = 5 µg/L (treatment and economics factored in)
Natural background levels higher than criteria
• e.g. 0.24 - 0.61 µg/L in Outer Coastal Plains based on geologic conditions
• Still lower than the TBELs in most places
All freshwaters are designated for water supply use (drinking water)
• Criterion applicable to all freshwaters regardless of existing use
Impaired 303(d) listed waters must meet criterion end-of-pipe
➢ NJ statutes and Clean Water Act does not alloweconomic/technology limitations for Human Health criteriadevelopment
➢ Modify WQBELs and not SWQS
➢ Short time frame (3 years)
➢ No relief when natural background concentrations,detection levels or technology based effluent limits >human health criteria
Why existing rules/policies cannot
address Arsenic?
Solutions – Finally ??!!
EPA’s Updated
WQS Rules in 2015
➢ Implementation issues when
attainment is economically or
technologically not feasible
➢ Legacy pollutants (e.g. PCBs),
mercury, nutrients, dissolved oxygen
➢ Stayed/Adjudicated permits
Arsenic
SWQS Variance
for Arsenic and
other
pollutants
Water Quality Standards Variance
(WQSV)(40 C.F.R. § 131.14)
Effective October 20, 2015
Definition: A time-limited designated use and criterion for
a specific pollutant(s) that reflect the highest attainable
condition (HAC) during the term of the WQS variance.
• Applicable for NPDES implementation – Underlying use/criterion remains
• Applies to identified
• Parameter/pollutant
• Water body / waterbody segment(s)
• Permittee(s)
• Term / Duration
• Assumption – Underlying designated use / criteria
achieved at the end of term
WQSV
Pollutant(s)
Water body
Term/Duration +
Reevaluation Schedule if
term > 5 years
Highest Attainable Condition
(HAC)
Supporting documents / justifications
Pollutant Minimization
Program (PMP)
Public participation
Legally binding / State
Attorney general
certification
Terminologies and
Abbreviations specific to WQSV
➢ Term - Duration
➢ Factors
➢ MDV – Multiple Discharge(s) Specific WQSV
➢ DSV – Single Discharge Specific WQSV
➢ Water body variance – WQSV applicable to water body
or waterbody segment(s)
➢ HAC – Highest Attainable Conditions
➢ PMP – Pollutant Minimization Program
Applicability of WQS Variance
➢ Time-limited designated use and/or
criterion
For Arsenic Variance, contemplating 15-20 years (3-4 permit cycles)
Justification:
• No EPA approved analytical method to measure as low as criteria
• No new technology in past 15 years for wastewater treatment
• EPA Drinking water MCL is 10 µg/L (WHO as well)
• NJ Drinking water MCL is 5 µg/L
• Multiple opportunities to evaluate and change
• Triennial Review
• Reevaluation – Synched with permit cycle (5 years)
Factors [40 C.F.R. § 131.10(g)]
1. Naturally occurring pollutant concentrations
2. Natural low/ephemeral/intermittent flow
3. Human caused conditions
4. Hydrologic modifications (Dams/diversions)
5. Natural features of water body (pools, riffles)
6. Substantial economic and social impacts
Highest Attainable Condition (HAC) Must be a quantifiable expression based on:
MDV / DSV
• Interim Criterion
• Interim Effluent Condition
reflecting greatest pollutant
reduction
• Interim criterion or effluent
condition based on optimization
of current treatment and a PMP if
additional controls are not
feasible
Water body Variance
• Interim Use and Criterion
• Interim use or criterion
based on optimization of current
treatment and a PMP if
additional controls are not
feasible
PMP – Pollutant Minimization Program
Definition: “a structured set of activities including an
implementation schedule to improve processes and
pollutant controls that will prevent and reduce pollutant
loadings.”
Guidance ??
Variance ProcessPermittee(s) Request or State Initiates
DEP Adopts WQSV through
Rule Making
EPA Approves
Stakeholder Input
Permittee(s) Input
NJPDES Implements
Public hearing, AG Certification
Duration > 5 years
Criteria met end of
duration
NO YES
Reevaluation at least every 5
years and submit to EPA +
Triennial Review
If permittee fails to submit reevaluation to DEP, original criteria applies
DEP Prepares Variance Package
WQS Variance for Arsenic
NJ SWQS Revision
• Update definitions
• New section to Include WQSV -applicability and requirements
• New section to list all variances
Arsenic Variance
• Multi-discharge(s) specific variance (MDV)
• Single discharge specific variance (DSV)
Anticipated
Process for
Arsenic Variance
* - PQL of 2 µg/L is tentative,
subject to confirmation from
Office of Quality Assurance, NJDEP
Workgroup Asks
• Consensus on arsenic variance process
• Term – 15/20 years??
• Identification of eligible permittees
• PQL as the threshold
• Should maximum reported concentration be
compared to PQL?
• Establishing background concentrations
• Data requirements and sufficiency
• Minimum number of data (10 ?)
• Minimum duration (2 years ?)
• Maximum duration (5 years ?)
• Acceptable frequency (Monthly, seasonal, annual
?? )
➢ Influent and effluent data – How much more?
➢ Anthropogenic sources – How much details?
➢ Legacy contamination – How to prove?
➢ Existing / Available technology – Is DSREH literature review
sufficient?
➢ Affordability for upgrade – When and how?
➢ Cost-effective and reasonable BMPs for nonpoint source – When is
this required?
➢ Documentation of HAC
Workgroup AskWQS Variance Data Requirements
FOR SUBSEQUENT
DISCUSSION
MDV – Multiple Discharge Specific Variance
Workgroup Asks (contd.)
• Identification of minimum concentrations by existing treatment
technologies
• Permittee specific – variable influent concentrations
• Requirements
• Information from Treatability study by Stevens
• What will be the data requirements to satisfy
supporting documentation
• Background/upstream ambient concentration ??
• Guidance document
• Data information requirements for future applicants
• Requirements for PMPs
• Requirements for economic impacts (if factor 6 is opted for)
DSV – Single Discharge Specific Variance
FOR SUBSEQUENT
DISCUSSION
Discussion - Next
Steps
• Communication mode – listserve? MS Office group?
• Scheduling
• Meeting frequency
• Should we create sub-workgroups?
Contact Information➢ Bruce Friedman, Director, Division of Water Monitoring & Standards
(DWM&S)
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 609-748-2001
➢ Kimberly Cenno, Chief, Bureau of Environmental Analysis Restoration
and Standards (BEARS), DWM&S
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 609-292-3075
➢ Biswarup (Roop) Guha, SWQS Lead/Rule Manager, BEARS, DWM&S
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 609-292-1592
➢ Gigi Mallepalle, SWQS Rule Team, BEARS, DWM&S
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 609-292-6015