new iaea coordinated research project on thermal
TRANSCRIPT
NEW IAEA COORDINATED RESEARCH PROJECT ON THERMAL-HYDRAULICS OF SUPERCRITICAL WATER COOLED REACTORS
Katsumi Yamada
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA),
Vienna, Austria
Laurence Leung Canadian Nuclear Laboratories
(CNL), Ltd., Chalk River, Ontario, Canada
Walter Ambrosini University of Pisa,
Pisa, Italy
ABSTRACT
In view of the high interest among a number of Member
States in the Supercritical Water Cooled Reactor (SCWR)
concept, the IAEA launched the second Coordinated
Research Project (CRP) on thermal-hydraulics of SCWRs,
entitled “Understanding and Prediction of Thermal-
Hydraulics Phenomena Relevant to SCWRs” in 2014 to
foster international collaboration. The key objectives of this
new CRP are to (i) improve the understanding and prediction
accuracy of thermal-hydraulics phenomena relevant to
SCWRs and (ii) benchmark numerical toolsets for their
analyses. At present, 12 institutes participate in the CRP from
10 IAEA Member States, and the OECD/NEA is in
cooperation, based on a special agreement with the IAEA, to
host a database housing experimental and analytical results
contributed from the CRP participants. The expected
outcomes from this CRP include (i) enhancement of the
understanding of thermal-hydraulics phenomena, (ii) sharing
of experimental and analytical results, and the prediction
methods for key thermal-hydraulics parameters, and (iii)
cross-training of personnel between participating institutes
through their close interactions and collaboration.
This paper describes the plan of the new CRP: overall and
specific research objectives; tasks and sub-tasks; schedule;
and expected outcomes and outputs. It also introduces briefly
other IAEA activities to facilitate and support R&D for
SCWR technology in Member States, which include
technical meetings and training courses.
1. INTRODUCTION
The SCWR is one of the innovative water cooled reactor
(WCR) concepts mainly for large scale production of
electricity. Operated at supercritical pressures, the SCWR can
achieve much higher core outlet coolant temperature, leading
to around 1.3 time higher thermal efficiency than current
WCRs. In addition, the system configuration can be
simplified compared to conventional WCRs. Hence, the
SCWR concepts have the potential for improved economics.
The SCWR concept was selected as one of the six
Generation IV nuclear energy systems and has been
developed in the framework of Generation IV International
Forum (GIF), and it is the only WCR concept among them
[1]. The major technical challenges to develop the SCWR
concept are: thermal-hydraulics of supercritical pressure
water; materials development and water chemistry; and
system integration and assessment [1].
There has been high interest in research and development
of SCWRs in a number of IAEA Member States. In 2008, the
IAEA officially launched the CRP on "Heat Transfer
Behaviour and Thermo-hydraulics Code Testing for SCWRs”,
which promoted international collaboration among 16
institutes from 9 Member States and 2 International
Organizations. The CRP was completed in September 2012.
Information gathered and generated in the CRP was
documented in an IAEA TECDOC [2]. A database of
thermal-hydraulics parameters of interest to SCWR
development was compiled and is currently housed in the
OECD/NEA databank.
Despite of the completion of the CRP, several
collaborations continued between institutes participating in
the CRP. Most of these institutes expressed their strong
interest and support to initiate a new CRP on
thermal-hydraulics of SCWRs to continue the momentum of
international collaborations. Experimental and analytical
information has been generated at those institutes and is
ready to be shared with others to advance the technology.
The IAEA has recently started the second CRP on
thermal-hydraulics of SCWRs. This new CRP is expected to
advance more application-oriented technology for
thermal-hydraulics of SCWRs based on the outcomes of the
previous CRP, which focused on fundamental research to
understand key thermal-hydraulics phenomena of
supercritical fluids. The objective of the new CRP is to
improve the understanding and prediction accuracy of
thermal-hydraulics phenomena relevant to SCWRs and to
benchmark numerical toolsets for their analyses.
Proceedings of the 2016 24th International Conference on Nuclear Engineering ICONE24
June 26-30, 2016, Charlotte, North Carolina
ICONE24-60876
1 Copyright © 2016 by ASME
The new CRP also aims to provide opportunities for
cross-training of personnel between participating institutes
through closer interactions and collaboration in Member
States.
The identified scope of collaboration covers key
thermal-hydraulics phenomena, both experimentally and
analytically, to the success in developing SCWR concepts
such as heat transfer and pressure drop characteristics of
supercritical-pressure fluids, natural circulation and parallel
channel stability, critical flow and critical heat flux (CHF)
near the critical pressure. It also includes several benchmark
exercises of computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools and
sub-channel codes, with the objectives to enhance their
prediction accuracy and extend their applicability.
2. SCWR CONCEPTS
The SCWR is a WCR concept that uses water pressurized
above the thermodynamic critical pressure (i.e., 22.1 MPa) as
reactor coolant. At supercritical pressures, water experiences
no phase change between liquid and steam. Reactor coolant
entering the core as low temperature, high density fluid
(liquid-like fluid) comes out of the core as high temperature,
low density fluid (steam-like fluid), which facilitates a
once-through reactor as in a pressurized water reactor (PWR).
Because the outlet temperature of the coolant is high and the
density is low, most of the SCWR concepts are designed as a
direct thermodynamic cycle system like a boiling water
reactor (BWR). The use of supercritical-pressure water as
coolant enables to achieve not only higher thermal efficiency
but also simpler reactor system configuration, which is the
combination of a once-through reactor and a direct cycle
system, than those of conventional WCRs.
A typical SCWR system has operating pressure of 25 MPa
and average core outlet coolant temperature targeted from
500 to 625 °C depending on concepts. Figure 1 compares the
pressure and temperature ranges of a typical SCWR core with
conventional WCR cores.
Fig. 1 Typical pressure and temperature ranges
of reactor coolant at various reactor types
The coolant temperature of conventional WCRs is
generally limited to the saturation temperature of its operating
pressure because heat transfer is decreased drastically when
fuel surfaces are covered with steam (sometimes called
‘boiling crisis’), but the SCWR could overcome the limitation
because no boiling occurs at fuel surfaces although attention
should be paid to heat transfer ‘deterioration’, which could
occur at low flow rate and high heat flux conditions but is
much milder than the boiling crisis.
Table 1 summarizes features of various SCWR design
concepts that are being developed worldwide ([3]-[8]).
The SCWR can be designed as pressure-vessel (PV) type
reactor like conventional light water reactors (LWRs) or as
pressure-tube (PT) type reactor like conventional heavy water
reactors (HWRs). Proposed fuel assemblies are based on
traditional WCR fuels, and the core can be designed as
thermal, fast, or even mixed-spectrum by adjusting the
amount and distribution of moderator in the core. Various
types of SCWR design concepts have been proposed with a
combination of the reactor type and the neutron spectrum.
For the reactor type, Canadian SCWR is pressure tube
type; and the others are pressure vessel type. Regarding the
neutron spectrum, some have thermal spectrum, and others
have fast spectrum. The SCWR-M concept is unique because
it has a mixed neutron spectrum that means the core has both
thermal and fast spectrum regions. The operation pressure,
the core outlet coolant temperature and the thermal efficiency
have been discussed above. For core flow path, most of the
design concept adopt double or triple core flow path that
means the reactor coolant passes the core region twice or
three times between the core inlet and the outlet.
One of the main advantages of the SCWR is that most
systems are based on existing WCR technologies, in which
extensive design, construction and operating experiences
have been accumulated worldwide, and on supercritical fossil
fuel-fired power plant (SC-FPP) technologies, which also
have substantial experiences in constructions and operations.
Proposed SCWR designs are expected to incur low capital
cost attributed to its high thermal efficiency and simplified
reactor system configurations. In addition, the possibility of a
fast neutron spectrum core would enable the SCWR to be a
high converter, or even a breeder, or a burner of
minor-actinides.
To realize the SCWR concept, on the other hand, extensive
and comprehensive R&D is necessary mainly because
operating pressure and temperature conditions are different
from those of conventional WCRs, and its flow channel
configuration is completely different from that of SC-FPP
boilers. One of the most important R&D areas is
thermal-hydraulics of supercritical-pressure water in fuel
assemblies. Precise prediction of fuel cladding temperature is
indispensable to evaluate the fuel rod integrity and safety
margin. Another critical area is materials for in-core
structures, especially for fuel claddings, and water chemistry.
It is necessary to adopt materials that can withstand under
high pressure, high temperature and irradiated water
conditions. And also, development of analysis tools for
system integration and safety assessment is necessary for new
reactor system design. The R&D needs mentioned above are
common to all SCWR concepts, and it makes collaboration
beneficial for the institutes having R&D activities and/or
developing their concepts.
2 Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Table 1 Comparison of Various SCWR Design Concepts under Development
Concept Name
[Reference]
Canadian
SCWR [3]
SCWR-M
[4]
CSR 1000
[5]
HPLWR
[6]
Super FR
[7]
VVER-SCP
[8]
Reactor Type1) PT PV PV PV PV PV
Neutron Spectrum2) Thermal Mixed Thermal Thermal Fast Fast
Moderator Heavy
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water (None) (None)
Normal Operation
Pressure (MPa) 25 25 25 25 25 24.5
Core Outlet Coolant
Temperature (deg-C) 625 510 500 500 508 540
Plant Thermal
Efficiency (%) 48 44 43.5 43.5 44 4345
Core Coolant Light
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water
Light
Water
Core Flow Path3) Single Double Double Triple Double Single
/Double
[Notes]
1) Reactor Type: PT means a pressure tube type reactor; and PV means a pressure vessel type reactor.
2) Neutron Spectrum: Mixed neutron spectrum means that the core has both thermal and fast spectrum
regions.
3) Core Flow Path:
Single core flow path means that the coolant passes the core region only once between the core inlet
and the outlet like the conventional PWRs;
Double core flow path means that the coolant passes the core region twice between the core inlet and
the outlet; and
Triple core flow path means that the coolant passes the core region three times between the core inlet
and the outlet.
3 Copyright © 2016 by ASME
3. OBJECTIVE OF THE CRP
The overall objective of the CRP is to improve the
understanding of thermal-hydraulics phenomena and
prediction accuracy of thermal-hydraulics parameters related
to SCWRs and to benchmark numerical toolsets for SCWR
thermal-hydraulics analyses.
More specifically, the CRP aims to:
1) Improve predictive capability of heat transfer, pressure
drop, sub-channel mixing, and critical heat flux (CHF)
at near critical pressures for SCWR fuel related
geometries including separate effects, and
2) Improve predictive capability of parallel channel
stability boundary, natural circulation flow and critical
flow.
4. PARTICIPATING INSTITUTES AND RESEARCH
COORDINATION MEETINGS
Twelve (12) institutes from 10 IAEA Member States are
participating in the CRP. These institutes are:
• Canadian Nuclear Laboratories (CNL), Canada;
• University of Ontario Institute of Technology (UOIT),
Canada;
• China Institute for Atomic Energy (CIAE), China;
• Shanghai Jiao Tong University (SJTU), China;
• Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany;
• Budapest University of Technology & Economics
(BME), Hungary;
• Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC), India;
• University of Pisa, Italy;
• JSC OKB Gidropress, Russian Federation;
• University of Sheffield, UK;
• National Technical University of Ukraine (NTTU),
Ukraine; and
• University of Wisconsin, USA.
The OECD/NEA is supporting the CRP, under a special
agreement with the IAEA, and hosts the thermal-hydraulics
experimental and direct numerical simulation (DNS)
database.
The Chief Scientific Investigators (CSIs) and observers
from participating institutes gathered at the first Research
Coordination Meeting (RCM) held at the IAEA Headquarters
in October 2014 to: 1) share information on R&D activities
so far and future plan related to thermal-hydraulics of
SCWRs at each participating institute; 2) discuss and
establish the tasks and their plan for the CRP; and 3) create
an Integrated Research Plan (IRP) for the 1st CRP period (i.e.,
between the 1st and 2nd RCMs). It was found that a substantial
amount of R&D activities had been performed, is on-going
and/or being planned at the participating institutes. These
activities are either supplementary or complementary to
others, and are of interest to most CSIs. The CSIs discussed
and established the task plan, as described in the next chapter,
was established to achieve the objective of the CRP. It
describes R&D activities in each institute and their common
interests.
The 2nd RCM was convened in Mumbai, India, in
November 2015 to: 1) review the R&D activities related to
the CRP at each participating institute during the 1st period;
2) discuss possible modifications to the CRP plan and tasks;
and 3) create IRP for the 2nd CRP period (i.e., between the 2nd
and 3rd RCMs). The CSIs presented their R&D activities and
discussed the results in detail. Based on the presentations and
discussion, the CSIs modified the task plan and established
the IRP for the 2nd period (i.e., between the 2nd and the 3rd
RCMs).
5. TASK PLAN OF THE CRP
The task plan established by the CSIs consists of eight
tasks and 19 sub-tasks, which are closely related and each led
by one of the CSIs.
5.1 Task 0: SCWR concepts update
Several SCWR concepts have been revised or newly
created since the survey in the previous CRP. This task has
been established to review and update the system parameters
of SCWRs under development such as operation pressure,
reactor coolant flow rate, core inlet and outlet temperatures
and geometries of the core and fuel assembly.
The outcome of this task will be up-to-date descriptions of
SCWR concepts and parametric ranges of interest for
thermal-hydraulics.
5.2 Task 1: Heat transfer in non-bundle geometries
Heat transfer tests in tubes and/or annuli have been
on-going in several participating institutes. In addition, DNS
is planned in an institute. It is expected that information from
the tests and simulation will improve the understanding of
fundamental mechanisms of heat transfer to supercritical
fluids and the prediction accuracy of cladding temperatures.
This task is separated into three sub-tasks: tests and
database update; correlations and scaling; and CFD analyses
and benchmark exercises.
5.3 Task 2: Heat transfer in rod bundles
Heat transfer tests in rod bundles are on-going or planned
in several institutes. Each test bundle has a different
geometry from others. Comparisons of heat-transfer
characteristics of these bundles would improve the
understanding of complex thermal-hydraulics phenomena and
enhance the prediction capability of the analytical toolsets
supporting the design and optimization of SCWR fuel
assemblies. This task is closely related to Task 1 and Task 7.
This task is separated into three sub-tasks: tests and
database construction; correlations for bundle geometries;
and numerical analyses and benchmark exercises.
5.4 Task 3: Pressure drop
Several institutes have obtained or plan to obtain new data
on pressure drop in tubes, annuli and bundles with
supercritical fluids. These data will be compiled into the
existing database to improve the understanding of hydraulics
characteristics and the prediction accuracy of pressure drops
over fuel assemblies.
This task is separated into two sub-tasks: tests and database
4 Copyright © 2016 by ASME
update; and correlation assessment, CFD analyses and
benchmark exercises.
5.5 Task 4: Natural circulation and parallel channel
stability
Supercritical pressure fluid flow can be unstable due to the
drastic change of density across the pseudo-critical point.
Single and two parallel channel experiments with natural
circulation of supercritical fluids are on-going or planned at
several participating institutes to improve the understanding
and prediction accuracy of natural circulation heat transfer
and parallel channel stability.
This task is separated into two sub-tasks: tests and database
update; and numerical analysis and benchmark exercises.
5.6 Task 5: Critical flow
Understanding critical flow characteristics is essential for
safety analyses and the design of pressure-relieve valves.
Two critical flow experiments with flow restrictions, such as
orifices and valves, are on-going. Data from these
experiments will be applied in model development. In
addition, a numerical analysis is planned.
This task is separated into two sub-tasks: tests and database
update; and numerical analyses and model development.
5.7 Task 6: CHF at near critical pressure (sub-critical)
CHF at sub- and near critical pressures is one of the
thermal limitations during pressure transients of SCWRs.
Very few data have been compiled from literature reviews.
CSIs have indicated that four (4) tests are planned with water
or surrogate fluids.
This task is separated into two sub-tasks: tests and database
update; and data analyses and correlation development.
5.8 Task 7: Sub-channel model improvement
Performing full-scale fuel assembly experiments is
premature at the conceptual design phase of SCWRs. Fuel
design and optimization are performed using sub-channel
codes. Most sub-channel codes have been qualified for use in
analyses at sub-critical pressures. Further qualifications
/improvements are required to understand and predict the
sub-channel effects at supercritical pressures. This task aims
at improving prediction accuracy of sub-channel models for
supercritical flow using CFD codes and DNS.
This task is separated into four sub-tasks: inter-subchannel
mixing; spacer effects on heat transfer; axial/radial power
profile effects on heat transfer; and sub-channel shape effects.
6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS
The expected outcomes of the CRP are:
1) Improved understanding of SCWR thermal-
hydraulic phenomena;
2) Improved accuracy of SCWR thermal-hydraulic
predictions;
3) Coordinated strategy for SCWR thermal-hydraulic
R&D;
4) Enhanced interactions and cooperation among
participating institutes; and
5) Enhanced education and knowledge management.
The outputs from the CRP include:
1) An IAEA TECDOC synthesizing the main results of
the CRP;
2) Joint papers in national/international scientific
journals and conferences; and
3) A thermal-hydraulics database.
7. OTHER IAEA ACTIVITIES RELATED TO SCWRS
In addition to the above-mentioned CRPs, the IAEA have
organized several initiatives regarding the SCWR in
collaboration with the CRP participants and other experts in
Member States.
In order to provide a platform for detailed presentations
and technical discussions, the IAEA holds Technical
Meetings on various areas, which lead to the exchange of
results, the fostering of world-wide collaboration in research
activities, improved communications between industry
(utilities, vendors, etc.), regulatory organizations and research
institutes, and the review and updating of the science and
engineering in the areas of common interest.
A Technical Meeting on “Heat transfer,
Thermal-hydraulics and System Design for SCWRs” was
held at the University of Pisa in Pisa, Italy, July 2010. The
Technical Meeting had the following main objectives with an
emphasis on application and design issues:
• To review progress in the development of correlations,
equations and methods to describe the heat transfer
behaviour with fluids under supercritical pressure
conditions;
• To evaluate comparisons of analyses and numerical
predictions of thermal-hydraulics codes against
theoretical estimates and experimental data;
• To review the status of core design and neutronics
studies for current SCWR concepts; and
• To review the status of current SCWR concepts,
system design and approach to safety.
The second Technical Meeting on the same topic is being
organized in August 2016.
Two Technical Meetings on “Materials and Chemistry for
SCWRs” were held at the Institute for Energy, Joint Research
Centre of the European Commission (EC/JRC) in Petten, the
Netherlands, July 2011, and at the Nuclear power Institute of
China in Chengdu, China, July 2013. Main objectives of
these Technical Meetings were:
• To review progress of international initiatives and
national programs related to R&D of materials for key
components of SCWRs;
• To exchange information related to testing
methodologies and experimental setups for
examination of candidate materials for SCWR
components;
• To review progress of international and national
programs related to the development of water
chemistry control strategies for the SCWR;
• To support further pre-normative research and code
qualification activities and their coupling with
numerical predictions models for the SCWR; and
• To identify the need for a new IAEA Coordinated
Research Project related to SCWR materials and water
5 Copyright © 2016 by ASME
chemistry.
As a means to disseminate the knowledge gathered through
the work performed under the CRPs and through the
presentations and discussion at Technical Meetings, the
IAEA has developed a one-week course on "Science and
Technology of SCWRs". The course provides a
comprehensive and up-to-date review of the science and
engineering of SCWR concepts, including thermodynamics,
thermal-hydraulics and heat transfer, neutronics and core
designs, materials and chemistry, system design and safety,
and a description of various SCWR concepts currently under
development in the world. Three courses were held at the
International Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP) in Trieste,
Italy, June 2011, at McMaster University in Hamilton,
Canada, July 2012, and at Shanghai Jiao Tong University in
Shanghai, China, August 2013. Participants in these courses
included graduate students, university professors, engineers
and regulators from IAEA Member States.
8. CONCLUSIONS
One of the IAEA’s key functions is to “foster the exchange
of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of
atomic energy”. The IAEA recently started the CRP on
“Understanding and Prediction of Thermal-Hydraulics
Phenomena Relevant to SCWRs”, to foster international
collaboration in Member States. The identified scope of the
CRP is considered as an application-oriented extension of the
previous CRP on "Heat Transfer Behaviour and
Thermo-hydraulics Code Testing for SCWRs” that was
completed in 2012.
Thermal-hydraulics of supercritical pressure water is one
of the most important areas to be clarified in order to analyze
and integrate the SCWR concept. The scope of this new CRP
covers key thermal-hydraulics phenomena, both
experimentally and analytically, relevant to SCWRs. This
CRP also hosts several benchmark exercises of CFD tools
and sub-channel codes.
The plan of the new CRP has been described. Other IAEA
activities, such as the organization of technical meetings and
training courses relating to SCWR development, have been
presented.
NOMENCLATURE
BWR: Boiling Water Reactor
CHF: Critical Heat Flux
CFD: Computational Fluid Dynamics
CRP: Coordinated Research Project
DNS: Direct Numerical Simulation
GIF: Generation-IV International Forum
HWR: Heavy Water Reactor
IRP: Integrated Research Plan
LWR: Light Water Reactor
PT: Pressure Tube
PV: Pressure Vessel
PWR: Pressurized Water Reactor
RCM: Research Coordination Meeting
SC-FPP: SuperCritical Fossil fuel-fired Power Plant
WCR: Water Cooled Reactor
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors express their gratitude to Chief Scientific
Investigators from the participating institutes for their
contribution to the CRP on “Understanding and Prediction of
Thermal-Hydraulics Phenomena Relevant to SCWRs”. They
are: Mr. I. Pioro, University of Ontario Institute of
Technology (UOIT), Canada; Mr. Y. Chen, China Institute of
Atomic Energy (CIAE), China; Mr. X. Liu, Shanghai Jiao
Tong University (SJTU), China; Mr. X. Cheng, Karlsruhe
Institute of Technology (KIT), Germany; Mr. A. Kiss,
Budapest University of Technology & Economics (BME),
Hungary; Mr. P.K. Vijayan, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre
(BARC), India; Mr. A. Churkin, JSC OKB Gidropress,
Russian Federation; Mr. V. Razumovskiy, National Technical
University of Ukraine (NTUU), Ukraine; Mr. S. He,
University of Sheffield, UK; and Mr. M. Anderson,
University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
The authors also acknowledge the OECD Nuclear Energy
Agency (NEA) for their cooperation in hosting the database
to collect and share experimental and analytical data for the
CRP.
REFERENCES
1. Generation IV International Forum, “Technology
Roadmap Update for Generation IV Nuclear Energy
Systems”, OECD/NEA, January 2014.
2. IAEA-TECDOC-1746, "Heat Transfer Behaviour and
Thermo-hydraulics Code Testing for Supercritical Water
Cooled Reactors (SCWRs)”, Vienna, 2014.
3. M. Yetsir, M. Gaudet and D. Rhodes, “Development and
Integration of Canadian SCWR Concept with
Counter-Flow Fuel Assembly”, Proceedings of the 6th
International Symposium on Supercritical Water-Cooled
Reactors, Shenzhen, China, March 3-7, 2013.
4. X. Cheng., X.J. Liu, Y.H. Yang, “A Mixed Core for
Supercritical Water-cooled Reactors”, Nuclear
Engineering and Technology, 40(2) (2007) 117–126.
5. Nuclear Power Institute of China, “Status report -
Chinese Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor
(CSR1000)”, IAEA ARIS Database
(https://aris.iaea.org/), March 2016.
6. T. Schulenberg and J. Starflinger (eds.), “HIGH
PERFORMANCE LIGHT WATER REACTOR Design
and Analysis”, KIT Scientific Publication, 2012.
7. Y. Oka, s. Koshizuka, el at., “Super Light Water
Reactors and Super Fast Reactors: Supercritical-Pressure
Light Water Cooled Reactors”, Springer, July 2010.
8. S.B. Ryzhov, P.L. Kirillov, et al., “Concept of a
single-circuit RP with vessel type supercritical
water-cooled reactor”, Proceedings of the 5th
International Symposium on Supercritical Water-Cooled
Reactors (ISSCWR-5), Vancouver, British Columbia,
Canada, March 13–16, 2011.
6 Copyright © 2016 by ASME