new global delivery vendor model · new global delivery vendor model ... best-in-class local...
TRANSCRIPT
Devices
Our Unique View: Businesses Services Software
enterprise consumer
Active Directory Enterprise Access
Live
Live
RE&F Functions
Client requirements Market analysis Workplace strategy Portfolio strategy
Design Construct Lease Integrate
Employee services Facility operations Environmental mgmt Capital renewal
Regional and Local RE&F
Functional Subject Matter Experts Guidelines and Standards Consultation Global Best Practices Governance
Global COE
Platforms
Organization Structure
Business Operations
Global Resources
Center of Excellence
•Workplace strategy •Environmental •Capital planning •PER Governance •Vendor management •Governance •Communications •IT & Data systems •ROB management •RE & Planning Platform •IFM Platform •PM Platform •Infrastructure •Procurement Excellence
Typical sub-structure Area
Manager
Area
Manager
Area
Manager
Execution
Regional
Directors
Workplace Strategies
Portfolio Manager
Portfolio Manager
Global
Procurement
EMEA Puget Sound Americas Asia
Portfolio Manager
Regional and Local RE&F Professionals • Client Point of Contact
• Greater focus on CRM, business strategy
• Partner (MSIT, HR, FIN, CPG) relationships
Global Vendor Integrator • Provide global accountability of Service Delivery
• Industry leading processes, tools and standard metrics reporting and KPIs
Best-in-Class Local Providers • By Geography and Function • Project Management, Brokerage, Integrated
Facilities Management
• Understand Business Needs
• Accountability for local plans, solutions and services
• Inform, adopt, and adapt global COE resources to local needs
• Innovate new best practices
RE&F Global Business Model
Global RE&F Centers of Excellence Guidelines, standards and Functional Subject Matter Experts (SMEs). Provides consultation and development global best practices for local adaptation and vendor governance.
• Global Resources Team
• FM, D&D, RE, ES & Technology
• SRM & Global Programs
• Communications
• Global Workplace Strategies
• Workplace Research
• Design Guidelines
• Change Management
• Global Procurement Group
• Regional and Global Sourcing
Be more strategic, more efficient, more effective – Deliver greater value to the business
Desired Outcomes The Model
Regional and Local RE&F Teams • Less tactical oversight--More strategic engagement
• Solutions strategically aligned to business
• Spending more time on client and partner relations
• Using information to manage vendors
• Translating business needs to real estate solutions
Global Vendor Integrator – CB Richard Ellis • Consistent quality of delivery across services and geos
• More agile, flexible processes -- quicker time to market
• Remove conflict of interest opportunities
• Single accountability for local PM, Brokerage, IFM, Data, Lease Admin & Prop Mgmt. delivery
• One platform for global metrics and reporting
• Responsible for sourcing, onboarding
Integrated Facilities Management • Gain efficiencies and leverage buying power
• Services that meets local business needs
• Consistent excellence in execution
• 3-4 IFM companies contracted globally
• Maintain choice for handling performance issues
• 3 year consolidation roadmap
Project Management • Scalability and choice–Best team on day
• Streamlined selection, execution and cost
• Improved execution--On Scope, On Time, On Budget
• Stable Model: 2-3 companies in each market
• Contracts with agreed pricing terms
• New Tier 1 contracts by November
Real Estate Brokerage • Choice and quality on day of delivery
• Performance Tension and leverage via Integrator
• Stable Model – 2-3 brokers by market on bid list
• New Tier 1 contracts by November
Finance Opportunities • Reduce time spent on tactical functions related to RE&F
• Improved data driven decision making
• Move Lease admin and payment management to Integrator
• Minimize PO/Invoicing by consolidating through Integrator
• Consistent RE&F financial reporting at country/region level
Challenges
RE&F
CBRE
Tier 1 Vendors
Tier 2 Vendors
RE&F
CBRE
• Over 9,400 People
• Over 150 Leaders
• 25 +/- Core I Firms
• 1 Direction
Solution • Governance leadership framework composed of
policies, processes, and performance measures
• Define expectations, accountability, authority, and responsibility among member partners
• Including its structure, stakeholders, and relationships.
• Governing Model
• Rules of the Road
• RASCI
• ROB
• CPIs, KPIs & SLAs
• Playbooks
Integrated Governance Plan
Strategic Evaluation Team
(SET)
Partnership Board of Directors
Regional Leadership Team
Functional Leadership Team
Guiding Coalition
Governing Organization
Vendor Model Definition APM Offsite
FY09
APM feedback – What want to do and what can’t get to: More client engagement
E&Y engaged to identify help frame up the solution, client and cross regional RE&F feedback
Brought in cross group regional and COE representation to kick off and define RFP
RFP sent to market mid-March FY11, bids back April
Vendor interviews in May, selection in June
RFP for Consultants
Opportunity Analysis Recommendations
FY10
E&Y Engaged Decision to Proceed
Team Kickoff RFP & Draft Governance
H1 FY11 Q4 FY11 Q3 FY11
Q1
FY12
Implementation Timeline Select Vendor Integrator
June FY11
Integrator vendor selected June
Work with Integrator to select LOB providers by geography
Define detailed change management plan and vendor transition timelines
Based on quality of service level need by geographies and function
No change for in flight Project Delivery and Real Estate Transactions
Work with new regional B3 Integration Managers for planning transitions
Select Project Delivery and Real Estate Vendors by Geography
Program Transition Plan and Activities
Transition New Project Delivery, Real Estate Services
Q1 FY12 Q2 FY12 Q3 FY12 Q4 FY12
Selection and Transition of Facilities Mgmt Vendors by Geography
© 2010 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Microsoft, Microsoft Dynamics, the Microsoft Dynamics logo, and [list other trademarks] are trademarks of the Microsoft group of companies.
The information herein is for informational purposes only and represents the current view of Microsoft Corporation as of the date of this presentation. Because Microsoft must respond to changing market conditions, it should not be interpreted to be a commitment on the part of Microsoft, and Microsoft cannot guarantee the accuracy of any information provided after the date of this presentation.
MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, AS TO THE INFORMATION IN THIS PRESENTATION.