new civil engineer airports
TRANSCRIPT
New Civil Engineer AirportsInmarsat, London
18 May 2017
Content
• Where Dublin airport is currently
• North Runway – the story so far
• Procurement status
• What next
Dublin Airport – the story so far
14thBEST CONNECTED
AIRPORT IN EUROPE
MILLION
PASSENGERS
27.9 No.1 BUSIEST ROUTE IN EUROPE
No. 2 IN THE WORLD
AIRLINES
37+11%PASSENGER GROWTH
VERSUS PREVIOUS
PERIOD
15,700JOBS DIRECTLY
SUPPORTED BY
DUBLIN AIRPORT
180DESTINATIONS
+2,200DEPARTING FLIGHTS PER WEEK
Source: Dublin Airport, January 2017
DUBLIN-LONDON
OVER
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
1 -2.1 0.3 0.4 1.1 1.5 3.3 2.9
2 18,431 18,741 19,100 20,167 21,712 25,050 27,907
3 -10% 2% 2% 6% 8% 15% 11%
-10%2%
2%
6%
8%
15%
11%
-15%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
15.0
17.0
19.0
21.0
23.0
25.0
27.0
29.0
Passengers
(m
illio
ns)
Dublin Airport has seen six years of consecutive growth to 27.9m in 2016
Source: Dublin Airport 2017
Continuing Growth with 14 new Routes & Services 2016
• Athens – Greece
• Cancun – Mexico
• Cluj – Romania
• Hamburg – Germany
• Hartford, Connecticut – USA
• LA – USA
• Montego Bay – Jamaica
• Montpelier – France
• Newark, New York – USA
Pisa – Italy
• Sofia – Bulgaria
• Vancouver – Canada
• Vigo – Spain
• Murcia - Spain
The
FASTESTgrowing major airport in
EUROPE
11.5%VS
5.1% European average
Source: ACI Europe and Dublin Airport 2016
Abolition of Air
Travel Tax in
2014
Ryanair growthexisting and new
routes
Competitive
short haul fares
Transatlantic
growthnew routes, new and
existing operators
... key growth drivers
Transfer Growth
1.2m passengers
in 2016
Traffic Growth
19 new routes
4 new airlines
A Key Economic Enabler
Critical piece of national
infrastructure enabling growth
Contributes 20% of Fingal’s
employment
Total economic impact
97,400 jobs
GDP: €7bn = 4%
Facilitates Foreign Direct
Investment
Gateway for island of Ireland
Connectivity
Direct flights to 180 destinations in 40 countries on 4 continents
Tourism/Travel
Local economic impact: 16,000
direct jobs
GDP: €1.3bn
20% Economic Value Added in
Fingal
Dublin Airport – On Campus Employment
Source: Intervistas Economic Impact Study, Dublin Airport 2015
We Need the Capacity that North Runway will Deliver
For summer 2017:
• 86% of slots between 0500 and 0000(local time) are utilised
• Full or nearly full for arrivals at 0900,2200 (local)
• Full or nearly full for departures at 0600,1600 (local)
• Full or nearly full for total movements at0600, 0800, 0900, 1000, 1100, 1200,1600, 1700, 1800, 1900 (local) (1700 –1900 Full)
Significant other capital projects delivering enhanced capacity
• Adding bussing
lounges and
departure gates and
other terminal
enhancements
Significant other capital projects delivering enhanced capacity
• Adding stands
and taxiways on
airfield
VISION Be the Best Performing
Airport
in Europe
Content
• Where Dublin airport is currently
• North Runway – the story so far
• Procurement status
• What next?
• Aer Ríanta developed a plan for a parallel runway system in the 1960’s.
• By 1972 this was in the County Development Plan – protecting surrounding land use.
• 1989 – First parallel runway delivered.
North Runway History
North Runway History
“The process to
develop the second
runway at Dublin
Airport will
commence, to ensure
the infrastructure
necessary for the
airport’s position as a
secondary hub and
operate to global
markets without
weight restrictions is
available when
needed.”
National Aviation Policy,
2015.
Year Development
1970s Incorporated in successive County Development Plans since the
1970s.
2005 Planning application lodged.
2007 Permission granted – 2 challenging conditions attached.
2008 Passenger numbers reach 23.4m., economic decline starts.
2009 Project put on hold.
2009-10 Passenger numbers fall by 5m.
2011-12 Fragile return to growth: passengers +2% p.a.
2014 Passenger growth of 8%.
2015 Growth of 15%: Passenger numbers reach 25m.
2016 National Aviation Policy endorses runway project.
2016 Decision to proceed with North Runway.
North Runway – Benefitting the Entire Economy
By 2043, North Runway will facilitate:
– 31% increase in connectivity
– New services to US, Africa, Far East
– €2.2bn growth in GDP
– 31,200 new jobs (7,000 of those by
2023; 1,200 during development)
North Runway Location and Technical Details• Parallel to the existing
Runway 10/28
• Separation between the
centrelines of 1690m.
• 60m wide plus pavement of
7.5m each side
• CAT III B instrument landing
system.
• Served by a parallel taxiway
to the south.
• Rapid exit taxiways to serve
each runway direction
• Taxiway separations
designed to accommodate
larger aircraft.
• Airfield and approach lighting
that permit automatic landing
in low visibility conditions
• A satellite fire station
• A perimeter road with a 6m
carriageway
• External road diversions
IAA as the Competent Authority
• EU regulation
598/2014
• Application of the
Balanced Approach to
Airport noise
• September 2016 – IAA
designated as the
Competent Authority
• Statutory Instrument
awaited
• Further public
consultation
Construction UnderwayConstruction Package 1
This initial phase of the project includes:
• Removal of hedgerows
• Tree felling
• Topsoil stripping
• New road construction
• Services diversions
• Compound formation
• Erection of site security fencing
96
A0 maps issued by request
Stakeholder Engagement
1067
client records on database
1450 email correspondence
between daa and
external stakeholders
207local residents met with (in a group
or individually) by daa
111Elected Representatives
have been met with (in a
group or individually) by
daa
59Parliamentary
Questions
raised in Dail
424
media articles relating to North
Runway
666 subscribers to
North Runway
project updates
696
correspondence via letter
with external stakeholders
15
public consultation and scheme
information days
6
community liaison
group meetings
30
staff briefings
38,000
leaflets dropped to
local communities
15,000
pieces of
consultation
material printed
YOU WILL NEVER DO
ENOUGH
Content
• Where Dublin airport is currently
• North Runway – the story so far
• Procurement status
• What next?
Procurement - Business Objectives
• Best possible technical solution
• Comply fully with OJEU legislation
• Early engagement of the market
• Harness extensive design expertise
• On time delivery
• Best value solution: fit for purpose runway, within budget/lowest & fixed cost
• Effective risk transfer
North Runway work packages breakdown
• Engine test Site – traditional client design and contract
• Site Clearance & Services Diversions including substantial
archaeological investigations - traditional client design and contract
• Building Insulation Scheme –
management contract
• Main Contract Works – D&B
Method of Procurement
• Objective needs to consider business requirements/expected outcomes
• Completion criteria form the basis of approach e.g. detailed design or
performance spec (ERD*)
• ‘Trinity’ of sourcing
* Employer’s Requirements Document
Contract Type
• Different types e.g.
o NEC (c) – collaborative
o FIDIC (yellow) amended – “all” risks transfer e.g. D&B
• Amount of risk we transfer (all/more/less)
• How we intend to manage variations
• daa Practice – generally use heavily amended FIDIC for D&B
Contract Form
• D&B (Design &Build)
o Time/schedule
o Scope (ERD driven)
o Resources required
• Traditional (Employers Design)
• Management contract
Commercial Model
• Fixed fee lump sum
• Gross Max Price (GMP)
• Target pricing
• Cost reimbursement – actual costs incurred
• Bill of quantities + O/H’s
Procurement Option Chosen
• Design and build– Fastest route to market
– Detailed Employers Requirements
– Reference design that deals with the big design issues/facilitates planning submission
– Access to multiple design teams
• Call for competition/shortlisting of tenderers
• Preconstruction services agreement with tenderers requiring compliant responses
• Competitive dialogue process allowing positive engagement with Tenderers
• Fixed price lump sum following competitive dialogue process during which:– Employers requirements are fully interrogated and understood
– Contractors design has been developed to demonstrate compliance
– Risks are fully understood and mitigated where possible
• FIDIC Yellow book conditions of contract; well known international form of contract and used
in Ireland
• Fits with Regulatory framework and airline expectations regarding fixed price
Main Contract Works - Interfaces• Decommissioning of existing operational facilities
– Aircraft parking stands
– Engine test facilities
• Existing physical taxiway system
• Integration with future known developments
– Taxiways
– Stands
– Control systems
– Electrical infrastructure
– New ATC control tower
– Drainage systems
• Integration with existing systems
– AGL lighting and control systems
– CCTV and security
• Defining the restrictions on delivery
– Mostly landside site
– Airside element requires controlled access and compliance with airport operational procedures
• Amendments to Airport documentation, operating procedures, manuals etc
Headline Programme
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Early enabling works
Engine Test Site
Main contract works
Procurement
Construction
Commissioning
ORAT
Building insulation
Package
Learnt to Date
• Run a good pre-qualification process for D&B consortia
• Be clear on risk transfer; mitigate where possible
• Ring fence scope; avoid change
• Spend time defining the interfaces and close the gaps
• Meticulously plan the physical integration of the Runway into the existing infrastructure
• Leave sufficient time for developing documentation for Regulatory submissions in design and
at completion
• Engage the Customer to ensure they know what they need to do to take on the Runway
• Plan for ORAT and start the process early
34
Price, Cost Certainty and Value Considerations
Price, Cost Certainty & Value Considerations
• Ultimately, Price will be set by the market
• Cost certainty and value can be mutually exclusive (can be a heads or tails decision)
• Cost certainty “models” require the supplier to evaluate risk before implementation and
include these in the tendered costs. Once included in a fixed price lump sum model there is
no opportunity to recover these costs at a later point - The risk is sold
• Risk evaluation can heavily distort the final tendered costs – broad range depending on the
suppliers evaluation of the level of risk transferred (primarily driven by prior knowledge)
• Allocation of these risk costs also distort cost analysis and make commercial negotiations
difficult – some suppliers will refuse to provide cost breakdowns (dichotomy of the transfer all
risk contractually v. commercial negotiations to remove cost of risk)
Thank You