neurosexism

25
neuro sexism Brianna Laugher | Haecksen miniconf | LCA2011

Upload: brianna-laugher

Post on 06-May-2015

1.123 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

"There are so few women in IT because the female brain is nogood at logic or mental rotation of 3D objects... right?"A lightning talk to be given at the Haecksen miniconf on Monday 24 January 2011 at Linux.conf.au.http://haecksen.net/miniconf-schedule

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Neurosexism

neurosexism

Brianna Laugher | Haecksen miniconf | LCA2011

Page 2: Neurosexism

“Delusions of Gender: How Our Minds, Society, and Neurosexism Create Difference” by Cordelia

Fine, 2010

Page 3: Neurosexism
Page 4: Neurosexism

yeah, but why are there so few women in open source??

Page 5: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

???

Page 6: Neurosexism

Slashdot 2006on a story about the founding of

Fedora Women

Page 7: Neurosexism

Women tend toward more social careers. Of course there are exceptions and there are women who choose fields which are more male-oriented by their nature (construction, military service) just as there are men who choose jobs traditionally held by women.Unlike some other fields, women aren't being kept out of programming through any sort of imposed discrimination. [...] Yes, they're a minority, but only out of choice. No one is telling women not to code.

http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=192551&cid=15806271 (2006)

Page 8: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

Men & women choose different careers and hobbies

Page 9: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

Men & women choose different careers and hobbies

???

Page 10: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

Men & women choose different careers and hobbies

“Nurture”experiences,societal norms, culture(sexism)

“Nature”“innate” differences

?

?

Page 11: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

Men & women choose different careers and hobbies

“Nurture”experiences,societal norms, culture(sexism)

“Nature”“innate” differences

?

?

XFeminism has succeeded! No overt discrimination!

Page 12: Neurosexism

Well, actually...

● Still overt discrimination● Sexual harassment – hostile workplace● Unconscious bias in hiring, esp. against mothers● The “second shift”● “We like what (we think) we are good at”● Numerical minority, lack of role models● Stereotype threat● Leadership – "competent but cold" vs "nice but incompetent"

Page 13: Neurosexism

Also...Hard to keep female and work identities compatible in male-dominated domains -

“The easiest solution to the problem of being female in a setting in which women are made to feel that they are inferior and do not belong is to become as unfeminine as possible.” p52

Can encourage “antifemale attitudes”

Page 14: Neurosexism

women are a minority in FLOSS/CS/technology

Men & women choose different careers and hobbies

“Nature”“innate” differences– different brains

different minds – cognitive abilities, personalities

Different how?

Page 15: Neurosexism

Different brains?

● angles in faces● cephalic index (ratio of skull length to skull breadth)● brain size● brain weight● neuroimaging to the rescue!

Page 16: Neurosexism

"The female brain is predominantly hard-wired for empathy. The male brain is

predominantly hard-wired for understanding and building

systems."

-- p1, "The Essential Difference" by Simon Baron-Cohen, 2003

Page 17: Neurosexism
Page 18: Neurosexism

“Blobology”

● Measures proxies for brain activity, not brain activity directly● Not clear what activity implies re involvement● Brain structure => psychological function is obscure – making reverse inferences is fraught● "Some neural differences are inconsequential, because they are offset by other compensatory differences. Other neural differences are alternative pathways to the same behavorial end." – Celia Moore, quoted p 143● “file drawer phenomenon”

Page 19: Neurosexism

Brain responses != “hard-wired” – brain differences are not specially pointed towards "nature", but also effects of socialisation and experience

The brain is malleable!

“Hard-wired”?

Page 20: Neurosexism

'Greater Male Variability' hypothesisThe idea that there is greater spread in male

populations (more idiots, more geniuses)

Even if it is so now... it is not inevitable or immutable. e.g. not seen in all countries.

intellectual ability as a fixed gift vs earned quality that can be developed p 184

Page 21: Neurosexism

“Equal but different”

What's wrong with that?

Page 22: Neurosexism

"Gender Equality 2.0 justifies a status quo in which politics,

wealth, science, technology, and artistic achievement continue to

lie primarily in the hands of (white) men." p 91

Page 23: Neurosexism

"It is not an accident that there is no Nobel Prize for making people

feel included."

– Neil Levy, quoted p 91 (from Hochschild "The Second Shift" 1990)

Page 24: Neurosexism

This work is © Brianna Laugher and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license, except where otherwise noted:

● Book covers and logos © their respective owners ●"Abolish gender” graffiti: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kristofher/4198179990/ CC-BY By Kristofher Muñoz●pink and blue cupcakes: http://www.flickr.com/photos/stuartwebster/4775041577/ CC-BY by Stuart Webster●"gender machine works": http://www.flickr.com/photos/trevorblake/3147797753/ CC-BY-SA By Trevor Blake●FMRI image (right): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:FMRI.jpg released into the public domain.●PET image (left): http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PET_Normal_brain.jpg Public domain, US government work.●Bell curve: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ci_generos.png CC-BY By User:Xjmos●Quote person: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Quoting.gifreleased into the public domain.

Page 25: Neurosexism

thanks!

[email protected]

identi.ca/pfctdayelise

brianna.laugher.id.au