neuroinformatics research at uo
DESCRIPTION
Neuroinformatics Research at UO. Experimental Methodology and Tool Integration. 16x256 bits per millisec (30MB/m). CT / MRI. segmented tissues. EEG. NetStation. BrainVoyager. processed EEG. mesh generation. source localization constrained to cortical surface. Interpolator 3D. EMSE. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Neuroinformatics Research at UO
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
Experimental Methodology and Tool Integration
source localization constrained to cortical surface
processed EEG
BrainVoyager
BESA
CT / MRI
EEG segmentedtissues
16x256bits permillisec(30MB/m)
mesh generation
EMSEInterpolator 3D
NetStation
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
NeuroInformatics Center (NIC) at UO Application of computational science methods to
human neuroscience problems Tools to help understand dynamic brain function Tools to help diagnosis brain-related disorders HPC simulation, large-scale data analysis, visualization
Integration of neuroimaging methods and technology Need for coupled modeling (EEG/ERP, MR analysis) Apply advanced statistical analysis (PCA, ICA) Develop computational brain models (FDM, FEM) Build source localization models (dipole, linear inverse) Optimize temporal and spatial resolution
Internet-based capabilities for brain analysis services, data archiving, and data mining
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
Funding Support
BBMI federal appropriation DoD Telemedicine Advanced Technology Research
Center (TATRC) $40 million research attracted by BBMI $10 million gift from Robert and Beverly Lewis family
Established Lewis Center for Neuroimaging (LCNI) NSF Major Research Instrumentation
“Acquisition of the Oregon ICONIC Grid for Integrated COgnitive Neuroscience Informatics and Computation”
New proposal NIH Human Brain Project Neuroinformatics “GENI: Grid-Enabled Neuroimaging Integration”
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
Electrical Geodesics Inc. (EGI)
EGI Geodesics Sensor Net Dense-array sensor technology
64/128/256 channels 256-channel geodesics sensor net
AgCl plastic electrodes Carbon fiber leads
Net Station Advanced EEG/ERP data analysis
Stereotactic EEG sensor registration Research and medical services
Epilepsy diagnosis, pre-surgical planning
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
NeuroInformatics for Brainwave Research Electroencephalogram (EEG)
EEG time series analysis Event-related potentials (ERP)
Averaging to increase SNR Linking brain activity to sensory–motor, cognitive
functions (e.g., visual processing, response programming) Signal cleaning (removal of noncephalic signal, “noise”) Signal decomposition (PCA, ICA, etc.) Neural Source localization
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
EEG Dense-Array Methodology
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
APECS: A new tool for EEG data decomposition
Automated Protocol for Electromagnetic Component Separation Motivation
EEG data cleaning (increases SNR) Separation of EEG components (addresses superposition) Data preprocessing prior to source localization
Distinctive Features Implements variety of algorithms (PCA, ICA, SOBI, etc.) Uses multiple metrics for fast, automatic classification of
extracted components Applies multiple criteria to evaluate success of decomposition (to
ensure that artifacts are cleanly separated from cortical activity) Calls high-performance, parallel C++ implementations of
Infomax and FastICA algorithms
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
APECS Evaluation: Qualitative Criteria
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
APECS Evaluation: Quantitative Criteria
Covariance between “baseline” (blink-free) and ICA-filtered data. Yellow, Infomax; blue, FastICA.
Infomax gives consistently better results. FastICA results are more variable.
ICA decompositions most successful when only one spatial projector is strongly correlated with blink “template” (spatial filter).
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
High-Performance ICA
Parallel FastICA: Over 130 times faster than MATLAB fastica.m Greater than 8-fold increase in
performance on 32 processors
Parallel Infomax: Over 3 times faster than MATLAB runica.m Greater than 3-fold increase in performance on 4 processors
NeuroInformatics Center Feb 2005BBMI: Brain, Biology, Machine Initiative
Brain, Machine, and Education Pittsburgh Science of Learning Center (PSCL) Collaboration
http://pslc.hcii.cs.cmu.edu/tiki-index.php LearnLab Research Facility (U. Pittsburgh, CMU)
Authoring tools for online courses, experiments, and integrated computational learner models
Support for running in vivo learning experiments Longitudinal microgenetic data from entire courses Data analysis tools, including software for learning curve
analysis and semi-automated coding of verbal data Parallel studies of learning using cognitive neuroscience (EEG,
fMRI) methods Multidisciplinary Effort
Computer Science (e.g., Maxine Eskanazi, Jamie Callan — CMU) Linguistics & ESL (e.g., Alan Juffs — U. Pittsburgh ) Psychology (Charles Perfetti — U. Pittsburgh)