neues zur neoadjuvanten vorbehandlung beim rektumkarzinom · 2 disclosure i have the following...
TRANSCRIPT
Prof. Dr. med. R. Fietkau
Strahlenklinik
Neues zur neoadjuvantenVorbehandlung
beim Rektumkarzinom
2
Disclosure
I have the following potential confilct(s) of interest to report:
Type of affiliation/ Name ov commercialfinancial interest company
Receipt of grants/researchsupports
Receit of honoraria or consultationfees:
Participation in a companysponsored speaker‘s bureau:
RochePierre FabreSanofi
Pfizer
3
Rektumkarzinom:
Kurzzeit RT versus
Langzeit RT
4
Rectal-Ca: 5 x 5 Gy vs. RCT (50,4 Gy + 5-FU)
5 x 5Gy(N=163)
RCT (N=163)
Locoreg. recurrences(3 years)
7,5% 4,4% p=0,24
Lokoreg. recurr. distal 6/48 1/31 p=0,21Survival(5 years)
74% 70% p=0,62
Late toxicity G3/G4 5,8% 8,2% p=0,53
Ngan et al. 2012
5
Rektumkarzinom:
RCT mit 5-FU
versus
5-FU / Oxaliplatin
6
CAO/ARO/AIO-94 Rectal Cancer Study: adjuvant vs. neoadjuvant RCT
Locoregional recurrence rate
Sauer et al. 2012
7
Rektum - Karzinom : RCT mit 5-FU versus Capecitabine
Hofheinz et al. 2012
8
Rektum - Karzinom : RCT mit 5-FU versus Capecitabine
Hofheinz et al. 2012
Overall Survival
9
Rektum - Karzinom : RCT mit 5-FU versus Capecitabine
Hofheinz et al. 2012
10
CAO/ARO/AIO-04
OPERATION
5-FU: 500 mg/m2/d als Bolus über 2-5 min. (Tag 1-5), Wiederholung Tag 29, insgesamt 4 Kurse
Chemotherapie:5-Fluorouracil 1000 mg/m²/d Dauerinfusion
1.+5. RT-Woche d 1-5
KONTROLL-ARM:
1 2 3 5 6 4
d 29-33
50.4 Gy:Radiotherapie 28 x 1.8 Gy
Chemotherapie:5-Fluorouracil 250 mg/m²/d
Dauerinfusion
Oxaliplatin 50 mg/m²/d
d 1
d 1-14
d 8 d 22 d 29
EXPERIMENTELLER ARM:
d 22-35
1 2 3 5 6 4
:Radiotherapie 28 x 1.8 Gy 50.4 Gy
Folinsäure 400mg/m2; 2h-Infusion Oxaliplatin 100mg/m²; 2h-Infusion 5-FU Infusion 2400 mg/m²; 46h-Infusion
d 1
5-FU-Infusion über 46 h
Wiederholung d 15; insgesamt 8 Kurse
OX
FS
11
Rektum-Ca: Neoadjuvante RCT mit 5-FU/Ox vs. 5-FU (CAO/ARO/AIO-04)
5-FU/Ox/RTN=624
5-FU/RTN=606
Toxizität Grad ¾ RCT 23% 20%Diarrhoe Grad ¾ RCT 12% 8%RT-Unterbrechungen 10% 7%RT-Abbruch/ RCT 3% 3%CT inkomplett/RCT 15% 21%Adjuvante CT Grad 3/4 36% 36%Adjuvante CT volleDosis
42% 65%
Adjuvante CT alle Zyklen
72% 77%
Rödel et al. 2012
12
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Disease free survival
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
13
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Overall survival
14
Table 2. Intention-to-Treat Analysis of First Events for Primary Endpoint Disease-free Survival
Fluorouracil and oxaliplatin group
(n=613)
Fluorouracil group (n=623)
Macroscopically incomplete local resection
(R2)
4 9
Locoregional recurrence (after R0/R1 resection) 12 23
Distant Metastasis/Progression 107 140
Death 36 26
First Event for Disease-free Survival (Total) 159 198
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
15
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
5-FU/Ox besser
16
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
5-FU/Ox besser
17
Rektum-Ca: neoadjuvante RT und adjuvante RTVergleich 5-FU vs. 5-FU/Oxaliplatin
Rödel et al. ASCO 2014
5-FU/Ox besser
18
ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2
STAR-01 NSAPB R-04 CAO/ARO/AIO-04
Cum.dose of pre-op. concurrentchemotherapy(planned)
Cape 40.000mg/m2
with or without
Ox 360mg/m2
5-FU 8.550mg/m2
with or without
Ox 360mg/m2
5-FU 8.550mg/m2, Cape 40.000mg/m2
with or without
Ox 360mg/m2
5-FU 10.000mg/m2
versus
Ox 200mg/m2
with5-FU 7.000mg/m2
Compliance withpre-op. CRT in Ox-groups
RT: 87%Ox: 41%
RT: 84%Ox: 66%
not reported RT: 94%Ox: 85%
Grade 3-4 Tox: pre-op. CRT
25% vs. 11%(p<0,001)
24% vs. 8%(p<0,001)
15% vs. 7%(p<0,001) (onlygrade 3-4diarrhea)
23% vs. 20%
pCR rate 19% vs. 14% (p=0,09)
16% (p=0.90) 21% vs. 19% (p=0,46)
17% vs. 13% (p=0,04)
Rektum-Ca: Phase-III-Studien 5-FU+Ox/RT vs. 5-FU/RT
nach Rödel et al. 2012
19
Rektumkarzinom:
Adjuvant CT
nach neoadjuvanter RCT
20
Rectal cancer: EORTC – Studie 22921:Effect of adjuvant CT following
chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy
R
OPERAT ION
T 3/4< 75 years
RT
RT 2 x 5-FU/Leucovorin
RT
RT 2 x 5-FU/Leucovorin
4 x 5-FU/Leucovorin
4 x 5-FU/Leucovorin
RT : 1,8 Gy 45 Gy
CT : 5-FU-Bolus 350 mg/m² d 1 – 5Folinsäure 20 mg/m² d 1 - 5
Bosset et al. 2007
21
Rectal cancer: EORTC – Studie 22921: Effect of adjuvant CT following
chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy
Bosset et al. 2014
22
Rektum-Ca: 5-FU/Oxaliplatin/Folsäure versus5-FU/Folinsäure als adjuvante Chemotherapie
nach neoadjuvanter RCT; Phase II-Studie (N=321)
Hong et al. 2014
Disease Free - Survival
23
5-FU / Ox 5-FUCAO/ARO/AIO-04 75,9% 71,2%PETACC – 06 73,9% 74,5%Hong et al. 2014 71,6% 62,9%ACCORD 12/0405-Prodige 2
72,7% 67,9%
Rektum-Ca: „Disease Free Survival“ nach 5-FU versus 5-FU/Oxaliplatin (3 Jahre)
24
Rectal cancer: Adjuvant chemotherapy
How often was adjuvant chemotherapy used?
CAO/ARO/AIO-94 • adjuvant 72%• neoadjuvant 81%
Hong et al. 2014 • neoadjuvant 100%
EORTC 22921 • neoadjuvant 78%
PETACC -06 • neoadjuvant 66%
CAO/ARO/AIO-04 • 5-FU/Ox 81%• 5-FU 82%
25
Rektumkarzinom:
Induktion CT
vor neoadjuvanter RCT
26
Rektum - Karzinom : Zeitpunkt der OP nach RT
Stadium : T2 – T3Radiotherapie : 13 * 3 Gy neoadjuvant
OP nach OP nach 1-2 Wochen 6-8 Wochen
„pathological 10,3 % 26% p = 0,005 down-staging“Spinktererhalt 68% 76% p = 0,27 möglich
Francois et al. (J Clin Oncol 1999); N = 201
27
Interval to Re-Staging
Tulchinsky et al. 2008
> 7 weeks
≤ 7 weeksp=0.05
p=0.03
N=132 patients (T3-4 or N+); 5-FU based CRT 45-50.4 Gy;Surgery scheduled 6-8 weeks after CRT
28
Rektumkarzinom: Induktions-CT + RCT +OP versus RCT + OP + CT(CAPOX)
Fernandez-Martos et al. 2010
CT/RCT RCT+ CT
pCR (%) 14,3 13,5Complete Study treatment 91% 54% p<0,000
01Grad 3/4 Tox during CT
14% 54% p=0,004
Grad 3/4 Tox during RCT
23% 29% p=0,381
29
Rektumkarzinom: Induktions-CT + RCT + OP versus RCT + OP + CT (CAPOX)
Fernandez-Martos et al. 2010
30
Phase-II: CAO/ARO/AIO-12
31
Rektumkarzinom:
Verzicht auf RT
bei alleiniger neoadjuvanter
CT
32
Rektum – Karzinom: alleinige neoadjuvante Chemotherapie
Boland et al. 2014
33
Rektumkarzinom:
Verzicht auf OP
34
Rectal cancer: Wait and See Policyfollowing cCR after CRT
Maas et al. 2011
Patients: 192 pts with cT3 and cT4 carcinomas; > 3 LN
RCT with Capecitabine
21 pts with cCR (MR; biopsy; endoscopy)
1/20 pt with local recurrence (salvage
sucessfully)Median follow-up: 25 months
35
Rectal cancer: Functional outcome of surgery (pCR) versus wait and see strategy
Maas et al. 2011
36
Rectal cancer: RCT versus RT + local excision for cT1; cT2, borderline cT2/T3
Bujko et al. 2013
Patients: N = 89Therapy: 5 x 5 Gy + 4 Gy
or
55,8 Gy + leucovorin/5-FU
LE
good responders: ypT0-1/R0/G1-2/yPN0 LO VO (N = 63; 70%)
no further therapy
37
Short course RT11,8% p=0,04
RCT 6,2% (multivariateanalysis)
Bujko et al. 2013
Rectal cancer: local recurrences (2 years)
38
Zusammenfassung:
1. Neoadjuvante RCT mit 5-Fu weiterhin der Standard im klin. Stadium II/III
2. Adjuvante CT mit 5-FU/Oxaliplatin bei Subgruppen (< 60 J.) nach neoadjuvanter RCT effektiv ?
3. Neue Therapieansätze - neoadjuvante CT / RCT- Verzicht auf RT oder OP in selektionierten Fällen
39
Rektumkarzinom:
Verzicht auf RT
40
Taylor et al. 2011
Preoperative high-resolution MRI can identify goodprognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed bysurgery alone – a prospective, multicenter, european study
41
Taylor et al. 2011
Preoperative high-resolution MRI can identify goodprognosis stage I, II, and III rectal cancer best managed bysurgery alone – a prospective, multicenter, european study
Problempunkte
Nicht auswertbare Patienten 11.3% (52/477)*Nur absolute Angabe der lokalen RezidivratenAnteil Stadium pl 40% (49/122)Anteil Stadium cl 46% (57/122)pT3/4 N0 3,4% (1/29)pN1 2,7% (1/36)pN2 12,5% (1/8)
* Deutsche Rektum-Studie: (3%)