networking of engineering college … affiliated to jntu, kakinada in andhra pradesh: ... the world...

International Journal of Digital Library Services

IJODLS | Geetanjali Research Publication 17

Vol. 6, January - March 2016, Issue - 1 www.ijodls.in

ISSN:2250-1142 (Online), ISSN 2349-302X (Print)

NETWORKING OF ENGINEERING COLLEGE

LIBRARIES AFFILIATED TO JNTU, KAKINADA IN

ANDHRA PRADESH: A PROTOTYPE DESIGN

BASED ON INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOUR

OF FACULTY

Dr. B. R. Doraswamy Naick

Asst. Professor in Library and Information Science

University College of engineering Kakinada

JNT University Kakinada 533003 (A.P) INDIA.

Email:[email protected]

Abstract

Information as a concept bears a diversity of meanings, from everyday usage to

technical settings. Generally speaking, the concept of information is closely related

to notions of constraint, communication, control, data, form, instruction,

knowledge, meaning, mental stimulus, pattern, perception and representation.

Information is anything that can change a person‟s state of knowledge and physical

representations of abstractions that can cause the change. It is evident that, relevant

information increases knowledge, reduces uncertainly and is usable for the

intended purpose. This paper is explain Networking of Engineering College

Libraries Affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada in Andhra Pradesh: A Prototype Design

based on Information Seeking Behaviour of Faculty

KEYWORDS: Information Seeking Behavior, Networking, Faculty, Library, Prototype

Design, Academic community, information-seeking.

INTRODUCTION

Information is needed in all stages of human development. People need information for

almost everything in their life. The human being is, thus considered as an „information-

seeker‟. However, information-seeking can often be an expensive and time-consuming

process. Much time could be required to sift through irrelevant items to locate the

required information. As we know, for information to be of optimum use, it must possess

the qualities such as relevance, accuracy, timeliness, currency, completeness, clarity and

cost-effectiveness. Also, these are some of the qualities that an information-seeker will be

looking for. Information-Seeking Behavior or „information behavior‟ as said frequently,

has emerged and grown as a subject of academic research. Through the years, it has

originated as the field of potential aid to the development of library and information

services too. The world has witnessed its transition from information status to that of a

subject for research at Doctoral and higher level further. In its developmental stage this

field has led to a division between the needs of academic community in terms of theory





and practice. The pursuit of knowledge has been revolutionized, mainly through the vast

expansion of information accessible via the networked systems. Increased knowledge of

the information-seeking behaviors of social sciences and humanities faculties is crucial to

meeting their information needs.

OBJECTIVES

To trace the genesis, growth and development of Engineering Education in

Andhra Pradesh

To survey the Engineering College Libraries affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada in A.P.

To identify the information needs and Information Seeking Behavior of

engineering college faculty affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada.

To offer suggestions for improvement of library services of JNTU Kakinada.

To design and develop a prototype networking model for the engineering college

libraries affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada.

HYPOTHESES

The Growth and development of engineering education in A.P show linear trend.

The libraries of engineering colleges affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada do not confirm

the AICTE norms.

There is no uniformity in the information needs and information seeking behavior

of the sample engineering faculty.

The sample faculties are not satisfied with the availability of resources in their

respective college libraries.

There is a feasibility to design and develop a prototype Networking model for

Engineering colleges affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada.

LIMITATIONS

The study limited to the faculty working in Engineering colleges affiliated to

JNTU, Kakinada.

The study is covers only engineering colleges affiliated to the JNTU, Kakinada,

do not cover the students of colleges.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

In this study, questionnaire method was mainly used for collection of data. Two types of

questionnaire were prepared for collection of data from the libraries and faculty members

from their respective Engineering Colleges Affiliated to JNTU,Kakinada. was also Data

collected from annual reports and other reference books needed for the study. the Data

collected during the period from May 2008 to July 2009. There are 197 engineering

colleges affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada. Fifty Engineering colleges have been selected for

the study. The colleges selected for the study which have been established before 2002.

From each college 30 faculty members of various engineering subjects have been

selected. In total 1500 faculty members have been considered for the study randomly





Table -1: District wise distribution of questionnaires and responses received

S.No. Name of the District Questionnaires

distributed

Questionnaires

received Percentage

1 Srikakulam 3 3 100.00

2 Vizianagaram 4 4 100.00

3 Visakhapatnam 8 8 100.00

4 East Godavari 8 8 100.00

5 West Godavari 8 8 100.00

6 Krishna 5 5 100.00

7 Guntur 6 6 100.00

8 Prakasam 8 8 100.00

Total 50 50 100.00

Sample of Fifty Engineering College Libraries affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru

Technological University were considered for the analysis purpose.

Table-1: shows distribution of questionnaires and responses received from the Librarians.

A total of 50 questionnaires were distributed in all affiliated engineering colleges and 50

questionnaires were receives with 100 per cent response rate.

Table-2: Distribution of Questionnaires and Responses received from Engineering

Faculty

S.No. Name of the

District

No. of

Colleges

Number of

Questionnaire

Distributed

Responded Percentage

1 Srikakulam 3 90 71 78.89

2 Vizianagaram 4 120 95 79.17

3 Visakhapatnam 8 240 185 77.08

4 East Godavari 8 240 194 80.83

5 West Godavari 8 240 188 78.33

6 Krishna 5 150 120 80.00

7 Guntur 6 180 139 77.22

8 Prakasam 8 240 193 80.42

Total 50 1500 1185 79.00





Tables-2: Shows that total of 50 engineering colleges Affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada and

the entire faculty were considered for this study. Accordingly the questionnaires were

distributed to all the 1185 teaching faculty responded and the response rate is 79 percent.

Table -3: Classification of Respondents by Designation

S. No. Name of the

District Professors

Associate

professors

Assistant

professors Total

1 Srikakulam 8

(0.68)

25

(2.11)

38

(3.21)

71

(5.99)

2 Vizianagaram 10

(0.84)

34

(2.87)

51

(4.30)

95

(8.02)

3 Visakhapatnam 27

(2.28)

62

(5.23)

96

(8.10)

185

(15.61)

4 East Godavari 28

(2.36)

59

(4.98)

107

(9.03)

194

(16.37)

5 West Godavari 28

(2.36)

57

(4.81)

103

(8.69)

188

(15.86)

6 Krishna 21

(1.77)

33

(2.78)

66

(5.57)

120

(10.13)

7 Guntur 22

(1.86)

48

(4.05)

69

(5.82)

139

(11.73)

8 Prakasam 29

(2.45)

65

(5.49)

99

(8.35)

193

(16.29)

Total 173 (14.60) 383 (32.32) 629 (53.08) 1185

(100.0)

Table-3: shows the three levels of faculty positions have been noticed in the survey, such

as Professor, Associate Professor and Assistant Professor. 53.08% of the Assistant

Professors among the respondents and 32.32% are belongs to Associate Professor. Out of

1185 respondents, 14.60% are Professors. The Pie diagram (Figure 5.1) shows the

strength of Assistant Professors are more.

(Figures in Parentheses indicates Percentages)

Figure 1: Classification of Respondents by Designation





Table 4: Classification of Respondents by Sex

Table-4: shows that 71.98% of the respondents (853) are male and the female community

forms only 28.02% (332). It shows that the members play a major role in engineering

colleges

Figure- 2: Classification of Respondents by Sex

Name of the

District Male % Female % Total %

Srikakulam 51 71.83 20 28.17 71 5.99

Vizianagaram 67 70.53 28 29.47 95 8.02

Visakhapatnam 137 74.05 48 25.95 185 15.61

East Godavari 153 78.87 41 21.13 194 16.37

West Godavari 135 71.81 53 28.19 188 15.86

Krishna 79 65.83 41 34.17 120 10.13

Guntur 97 69.78 42 30.22 139 11.73

Prakasam 134 69.43 59 30.57 193 16.29

Total 853 71.98 332 28.02 1185 100.00





Table- 5: Classification of Respondents by Age

Name of the

District

Below 30

Years

Between

31-40

Years

Between

41-50

Years

Between

51-60

Years

Above

60

Years

Total

Srikakulam 34

(47.89)

29

(40.85)

4

(05.63)

2

(02.82)

2

(02.82)

71

(5.99)

Vizianagaram 25

(26.32)

28

(29.47)

15

(15.79)

19

(20.00)

8

(08.42)

95

(8.02)

Visakhapatnam 44

(23.78)

42

(22.70)

51

(27.57)

32

(17.30)

16

(08.65)

185

(15.61)

East Godavari 47

(24.23)

68

(35.05)

46

(23.71)

21

(10.82)

12

(06.19)

194

(16.37)

West Godavari 18 (9.57) 103

(54.79)

35

(18.62)

23

(12.23)

9

(04.79)

188

(15.86)

Krishna 21

(17.50)

51

(42.50)

27

(22.50)

18

(15.00)

3

(02.50)

120

(10.13)

Guntur 27

(19.42)

77

(55.40)

17

(12.23)

16

(11.51)

2

(01.44)

139

(11.73)

Prakasam 45

(23.32)

76

(39.38)

42

(21.76)

23

(11.92)

7

(03.63)

193

(16.29)

Total 261

(22.03)

474

(40.00)

237

(20.00)

154

(13.00)

59

(4.98)

1185

(100.0)

Table-5: reveals that, 40% of the samples are in the age group between 31-40 years,

followed by 22.03%in the age group of below 30 years. In other words, about 20% of the

total sample falls in the age group ranging from 41-50 years. A meager percentage of

samples (4.98%) only fall under the age group of above 60 years

(Figures in Parentheses indicates Percentages)

Figure-3: Classifications of Respondents by Age





Motivational factors

A number of factors would motivate any information seeker and in this study a total of

seven variables were identifies and analyzed. These factors might be influenced by the

college‟s affiliation as well the designation of the respondents. Therefore, in this study,

the impact of these factors was analyzed through five point scale and the same is analyzed

in the Table- 6:

Table- 6: Motivation among Faculty Members

Description 1 2 3 4 5 WAM Rank

To prepare for class teaching

143

(12.07)

183

(15.44)

215

(18.14)

281

(23.71)

363

(30.63)

272.87 1

To guide the students/Research

scholars

137

(11.56)

205

(17.30)

215

(18.14)

278

(23.46)

350

(29.54)

270.27 5

For participation in

seminars/conference etc.

144

(12.15)

197

(16.62)

226

(19.07)

302

(25.49)

316

(26.67)

266.93 6

To increase promotional

opportunities

157

(13.25)

184

(15.53)

228

(19.24)

286

(24.14)

330

(27.85)

266.87 7

To improve knowledge in

scholarship

136

(11.48)

188

(15.86)

228

(19.24)

300

(25.32)

333

(28.10)

270.73 4

To write and publish papers

130

(10.97)

188

(15.86)

246

(20.76)

281

(23.71)

340

(28.69)

271.20 3

To set up question papers and

related exam work

140

(11.81)

176

(14.85)

239

(20.17)

283

(23.88)

347

(29.28)

271.73 2

{1Non

Motivator}

{2Weakest

Motivator}

{3Average

Motivator}

{4Fairly

Motivator}

{5Strongest

Motivator}





Table-6: presents the responses given to motivation among faculty members. It shows

that the „strongly motivator‟ marked the highest for „to prepare for class teaching‟

(30.63%) and lowest for „for participation in seminars conference etc‟ (26.67%). The

highest of 25.48% of respondents „fairly motivator‟ for „participation in

seminars/conference etc‟ and lowest of (23.45%) were marked for „to guide the

students/research scholars‟. Further the WAM values for the variables namely „to prepare

for class teaching‟, „to setup question papers and related exam work‟, „to write and

publish papers

Table-7: Use of Materials among Faculty Members

Type of Materials Often % Rarely %

Not

at

all

% WAM Rank

Civil Engineering 285 24.05 423 35.70 477 40.25 427.00 9

Electrical Engineering 275 23.21 419 35.36 491 41.43 431.00 4

Mechanical Engineering 297 25.06 411 34.68 477 40.25 425.00 12

Electronics Engineering 275 23.21 419 35.36 491 41.43 431.00 4

Communication

Engineering 275 23.21 417 35.19 493 41.60 431.33 2

Computer-Science

Engineering 297 25.06 415 35.02 473 39.92 424.33 13

Physics 285 24.05 425 35.86 475 40.08 426.67 10

Chemistry 275 23.21 421 35.53 489 41.27 430.67 6

Mathematics 297 25.06 415 35.02 473 39.92 424.33 13

English 275 23.21 415 35.02 495 41.77 431.67 1

Humanities 275 23.21 420 35.44 490 41.35 430.83 5

Information Technology 294 24.81 415 35.02 476 40.17 425.33 11

Science and Technology 285 24.05 421 35.53 479 40.42 427.33 7

Bio-Technology 285 24.05 423 35.70 477 40.25 427.00 9

Environment Science 297 25.06 411 34.68 477 40.25 425.00 11

Water Resource 285 24.05 423 35.70 477 40.25 427.00 9

Spatial-Information

Technology 275 23.21 418 35.27 492 41.52 431.17 3

Pharmaceutical Sciences 297 25.06 411 34.68 477 40.25 425.00 12

Nano-science-technology 285 24.05 423 35.70 477 40.25 427.00 9

Applied Arts 285 24.05 425 35.86 475 40.08 426.67 10

Painting 297 25.06 411 34.68 477 40.25 425.00 12

Sculpture 285 24.05 422 35.61 478 40.34 427.17 8

Photography 275 23.21 419 35.36 491 41.43 431.00 4





Table- 8: Use of Materials among Faculty Members Vs District wise WAM value WAM-

Weighted Arithmetic Mean} {R-Rank}

Table-8:shows the Weighted Arithmetic (WAM) values for the categories of materials

referred by Faculty members who were working in engineering colleges.





Table-8:presents the WAM values along with rank order for the categories of materials

referring by faculty. The majority of respondents referred by

Rank 1 English (431.67)

Rank 2 Communication Engineering (431.33)

Rank 3 Spatial Information Technology (431.17)

Further, analysis has been made by District wise to gauge any difference among the

faculties of various districts (Table 5.19). The three point scaling results, based on WAM

values, the first three preferences by the respondents according to district wise are as

follows:

Srikakulam

Rank 1 Civil Engineering (27.50)

Rank 1 Electronics Engineering (27.50)

Rank 1 Physics (27.50)

Vizianagaram

Rank 1 Applied Arts (35.33)

Rank 2 Bio-Technology (35.00)

Rank 3 Spatial Information Technology (34.83)

Visakhapatnam

Rank 1 Electrical Engineering (67.67)

Rank 1 Chemistry (67.67)

Rank 1 Humanities (67.67)

East Godavari




West Godavari




Krishna

Rank 1 Civil Engineering (44.67)


Rank 1 Electronics Engineering (44.67)





Guntur


Rank 1 Mechanical Engineering (68.67)


Prakasam

Rank 1 Mechanical Engineering (49.83)

Rank 1 Computer Science Engineering (49.83)

Rank 1 Mathematics (49.83)

FINDINGS

All the engineering colleges impart technical education, the academic and

research need of the faculty would have been similar.

The hypothesis is not proved to be valid in majority of the parameters taken

into consideration to study of information seeking behaviour.

The growth and development of engineering education in A.P show linear

trend. The hypothesis is accepted. The hypothesis is found to be valid in most

of the cases.

There is no significant difference in the purpose of using library among these

engineering colleges. In other words, there are proportions of faculty of all the

engineering colleges affiliated to JNTUK. This hypothesis is found to be valid.

No uniformity in the information need and information seeking behaviour

among the responded Assistant Professors, Associate Professors and

Professors.

Dependence on more than one channel to seek and collect information is

crystal clear.

There is a feasibility to design and develop a prototype networking model for

engineering colleges affiliated to JNTU, Kakinada, have been proved and

found valid.

A PROTOTYPE DESIGN JNTUK-LIBNET

There is a need for the networking of engineering college libraries in India in general and

Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada, in particular, as the concept and

resource sharing is predominant in library services. Hence, it is an urgent need to

network the library materials and resources on web. The ultimate way to perform this

function is networking of library through internet. Therefore, at present there is no

networking for engineering college libraries affiliated to JNTUK, hence it is proposed to

develop a network system for affiliated engineering college libraries and is named as

JNTUK-LIBNET. This is the main page of the JNTUK-LIBNET prototype design. It

contains links for various services provided and shows the present expansion of JNTUK.





Figure- 4: Home page of the JNTUK-LIBNET

By clicking the “online collection” in the main page (Fig-4), the(Fig-5:) will appear,

which will display the online collections of materials available in the libraries of JNTUK-

LIBNET.

Figure -5: Online collection page of the JNTUK-LIBNET

By clicking the “opac” in the main page (Fig-4), the (Fig -6:)will appear, which will

display the login page for participating libraries in the JNTUK-LIBNET





Figure 6: OPAC login page of JNTUK-LIBNET

CONCLUSION AND RECEMENDATIONS

Library Networks Initiatives in India are still at a nascent stage of development. With the

advent of the Internet and World Wide Web, Electronic Library Development in India

begins with the goal of preservation of art, culture and heritage of the country. The

electronic environment in the Indian context is a new concept that became a reality

through projects funded by the government. In Indian scenario, the electronic resource

programmes are in their initial stages and much needs have to be done to prepare a long

term strategy to sustain these efforts and preserve the electronic resources for the future

use. Electronic Library applications span widely disparate content types, values, origins,

longevities and widely disparate user purposes and operating environments.

Libraries electronic or traditional exist to serve diverse purposes and constituencies. An

electronic library deals with organization and access of a large information repository.

The key to an electronic library is not electronic of physical materials, but the

organization of physical and electronic collection for better access. The organization

provides coherence to a massive amount of shared knowledge, while the access provides

convenient retrieval for a wide range of users distributed across a network..

REFERENCE

Menzel, Herbert (1966). Information needs and users in science and technology.

In: Carlos A Cuadra (ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology.

V.1. New York: John Wiley Sons. 41-69

Saul and Herner, Mary, Herbeert (1976). Information needs and uses in science

and technology. In: Carlos A Cuadra (ed). Annual Review of Information Science

and Technology. V.2. New York: John Wiley Sons. 1-34.





Paisley, Willaima J (1968). Information needs and uses. In: Carlos A Cuadra (ed.).

Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. V.3. Chicago:

Encyclopaedia Britannica. 1-30.

Allen, Thomas J (1969). Information needs and uses. In: Carlos A Cuadra and

Ann W Luke (ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. V.4.

Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica. 3-29.

Lipetz, Ben-ami (1970). Information needs and uses. In: Carlos A Cuadra (ed.).


Encyclopaedia Britannica. 3-32

Crane, Diana (1971). Information needs and uses. In: Carlos A Cuadra (ed.).


Encyclopaedia Britannica. 3-39.

Lin, Nan and Garvey, William D (1972). Information needs and uses. In: Carlos A

Cuadra (ed.). Annual Review of Information Science and Technology. V.7.

Washington, DC. American Society for Information Science. 5-37.

Marchionini, Gary and Komlodi, Anita (1998). Design of interfaces for

information seeking. In. Martha E Williams (ed.). Annual Review of Information

Science and Techonolgy. V.33. Medford, NJ: Information Science Today Inc. 89-

130.

Pettigrew, KE: Fidel, R and Bruce, H. (2000). Conceptual frameworks in

information behavior. In. Martha E Williams (ed.). Annual review of Information

Science and Technology. V.35. Medford, NJ: Information Science Today Inc. 43-

78.

Gupta, B M (ed.). (1991). Information seeking behavior, needs and requirements.

Handbook of Libraries, Archives and information centres in Inda. V.11. New

Delhi: Aditya Prakashan. 271-292.

Meho, Lokman I and Tibbo, Helen R. (2003). Modeling the information seeking

behavior of social scientists: Ellis‟s study revisisted. Journal of the American

Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6):1-18.

Hari Krishna Reddy, S and Karisiddappa, C R (1997). Information seeking

behavior of the professionals in the field of disabilities with special reference to

mentally handicapped in India. Annuals of Library Science and Documentation,

44(2): 54-64.

Spink, Amanda: Jaeckel, Martin and Sidberry, Greg (1997). Information seeking

and information needs of low income African American Households:

Wynneewood health neighbourhood project. Available

at:http://www.asis.org/annual-97/spink.html.

Marcella, Rita and Baxter, Graeme (1999). The information needs and the

information seeking behavior of a national sample of the population in the United

Kingdom with special reference to needs related to citizenship. Journal of

Documentation, 55(2): 159-183.





Marcella, Rita and Baxter, Graeme (2000). The information need, information

seeking behavior and participation with special reference to needs related to

citizenship: results of a national survey. Journal of Documentation, 56(2):

136-160.

Ikoja-Odongo, Robert and Ocholla, Dennis N (2003). Information needs and

information seeking behavior of artisan fisher folk of Uganda. Library &

Information Science Research, 25(1):89-105.

Adedibu, L.O. and Adio, G. Information needs and information seeking patterns

of medical students at Lautech, Ogbomoso. ASLIB proceedings, v.49, No.9,

October 1997. P. 238-42.

Hammond, C. and Mitchell, E. Library instruction for the professions:

information needs and libraries. Reference service review, v.25, No.2, 1997. P. 79-

86.

Pelzer, N.L., Wiese W.H. and Leysen, J.M. Library use and information seeking

behavior of veterinary medical students revisisted in the electronic environment.

Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, v.86, No.3, July 1998. P. 346-55.

Hallmark, Julie (2003). Information-Seeking Behavior of Meteorologists and

other Atmospheric Scientists: Access and Retrieval of Cited References. Issues in

Science & Technology Librarianship, 38.Available at http://www.istl.org/03-

summer/index.html.

Ramos, K; Linscheid, R and Schafer, S (2003). Real-time information-seeking

behavior of residency physicians. Family Medicine, 35(4):261-263.

Hert, C.A. Rosenbaum, H and Skutnik, S.C. (1995) Information needs and uses

during Internet training. In. Proceedings of 58th

Annual Meeting of the American

Society for Information Science, 1995.p.61-68.

Marcella. R. (1997) an investigation of need of Internet amongst users. Journal of

Librarianship and Information Science, V.29, No.2, Jun 1997.p.69-76.

Seiden, Peggy; Szymborski, Kris and Norelli, Barbara (1997). Undergraduate

students in the digital library: information seeking behavior in a heterogeneous

environment. Accessed online from http://www.ala.org/acrl/paperhtm/c26.html

Prasada Rao, B. (2010). Networking of Government Polytechnic College Libraries

in Chittoor District : A Prototype Design Based on Survey. M.Phil. thesis

submitted to Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, June 2010. (Research

Supervisor-D.Chandran).

Ramesh Babu, B. and Asok Kumar, S.K. (2007). Networking of Public Libraries

in India (PUBLIBNET): A prototype design. PEARL: A Journal of Library and

Information Science, Vol.1, No.1: p.22-29.

27.Husain, A.A. (2011). Application

of information and communication technologies in special libraries in Kuwait.

Electronic Library, Vol.29, No.4: p.457-469.

networking of engineering college … affiliated to jntu, kakinada in andhra pradesh: ... the world...

Documents