nel & fmc intercomparison revc - euramet center located in erie, pa usa. the mv test system is a...

BI-LATERAL INTERCOMPARISON OF OIL FLOW FACILITIES

BETWEEN NEL AND FMC TECHNOLOGIES

A Report for

FMC Technologies 1602 Wagner Avenue

Erie, PA 16510 USA

Project No: FGTR11 Report No: 2011/435 Date: January 2012

This report is issued as part of the contract under which the work has been carried out for the client.

NOTES 1 This report may be published in full by the client unless it includes information

supplied in confidence by TUV SUD NEL Ltd or any third party. Such information, if included within the report, shall be identified as confidential by TUV SUD NEL Ltd.

2a The prior written consent of TUV SUD NEL Ltd shall be obtained by the client

before publication by them of any extract from, or abridgement of, this report. 2b The prior written consent of TUV SUD NEL Ltd shall be obtained by the client

before publication:

Where such publication is made in connection with any public enquiry, legal proceedings or arbitration.

Where such publication is made in connection with any company prospectus or

similar document.

Where the client has notice that TUV SUD NEL Ltd is seeking or intends to seek patent or like protection for any intellectual property produced in the course of rendering the services.

NEL

Project No: FGTR11 of 44 January 2012 Report No: 2011/435

TUV SUD NEL Ltd EAST KILBRIDE

GLASGOW G75 OQF UK

Tel: +44(0)1355 220222 Fax: +44(0)1355 272999

www.tuvnel.com

For Michael Valente

Managing Director

Date: January 2012

BI-LATERAL INTERCOMPARISON OF OIL FLOW FACILITIES

BETWEEN NEL AND FMC TECHNOLOGIES

A Report for

FMC Technologies 1602 Wagner Avenue

Erie, PA 16510 USA

Prepared by: Approved by:

Chris Mills Richard Paton

NEL


CONTENTS Page

1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 5 2 TEST FACILITIES AND METER PACKAGE .............................................. 5 2.1 FMC Test Facilities and Package ................................................................ 5 2.2 NEL Test Facilities ....................................................................................... 6 2.3 Intercomparison Package ............................................................................ 8 2.4 Test Conditions ............................................................................................ 9 3 CONDUCT OF THE INTERCOMPARSION ................................................. 11

4 TEMPERATURE CORRECTION ................................................................. 11

5 TEST RESULTS .......................................................................................... 12

6 CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................... 12

TABLE 3 SUMMARY OF NEL LOW VISCOSITY RESULTS ................... 13 TABLE 4 SUMMARY OF NEL HIGH VISCOSITY RESULTS ................... 14 TABLE 5 SUMMARY OF FMC LOW VISCOSITY RESULTS ................... 15 TABLE 6 SUMMARY OF FMC HIGH VISCOSITY RESULTS .................. 16 TABLE 7 SUMMARY RESULTS AND EQUIVALENCE RATIO ............... 17 APPENDIX A NEL CERTIFICATES FOR LOW VISCOSITY TESTS ....... 20 APPENDIX B NEL CERTIFICATES FOR HIGH VISCOSITY TESTS ....... 29 APPENDIX C FMC RESULTS FOR LOW VISCOSITY TESTS ................ 38 APPENDIX D FMC RESULTS FOR HIGH VISCOSITY TESTS ............... 41 APPENDIX E FMC NVLAP ACCREDITATION RANGE ........................... 43

NEL


1 INTRODUCTION This document provides the detail of a bilateral comparison undertaken between the high viscosity oil calibration facilities at TUV SUD NEL Ltd (NEL) and FMC Technologies (FMC). After discussion with FMC a transfer meter package and test program was agreed upon. NEL were contracted to provide a bilateral intercomparison opportunity for FMC following the commissioning of their oil flow calibration facility located in Erie, PA, USA. FMC manufacture various types of flowmeter and have recently completed the commissioning of an ISO 17025:2005 (NVLAP laboratory code 200939-0) accredited flow calibration test facility in support of the manufacture and development of their products. To provide confidence in the performance of the flow facility, a requirement of ISO 17025 accreditation is to participate in intercomparison of measurement with other accredited laboratories. TUV SUD NEL Ltd (NEL) is custodian of the National Standards for flow measurement in the UK. In fulfilling this role NEL holds a wide range of flow test facilities covering water, a variety of oils, gas and multiphase flow. The single phase flow facilities are accredited to ISO 17025 by United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS Accreditation no. 0009) As the designated National Measurement Institute for flow measurement in the UK, NEL participates in the European co-operation for metrology institutes (EURAMET) and has participated in many national and international intercomparisons. The Flow capability has been accepted into the Key Comparison Data-Base held by BIPM on behalf of the CIPM. The roles and positions of BIPM and CIPM as the coordinators of world metrology can be seen at www.bipm.org. NEL recently completed the International Key Comparison for Hydrocarbon flow where equivalence was established between institutes in Europe and the Asia pacific metrology area, APMP. The role and description of the CIPM key comparison work, and its support for the international Mutual Recognition Agreement (MRA), can be obtained from the web site of the BIPM (www.bipm.org). The results of the hydrocarbon Key Comparison are available from: http://kcdb.bipm.org/AppendixB/appbresults/ccm.ff-k2/ccm.ff-k2.pdf As a designated national metrology institute NEL is entitled to place the CIPM MRA logo and accompanying explanation as part of calibration certificates (see Appendices 1 and 2). 2 TEST FACILITIES AND METER PACKAGE The test facilities, the test procedure, and details of the package are summarised below. Additional details are provided in the calibration certificates in the Appendices. 2.1 FMC Test Facilities The Multi-Viscosity (MV) Test System is part of the FMC Technologies Flow Research and Test Center located in Erie, PA USA. The MV Test System is a closed loop test system, with two (2) separate test lines. A test is run through either test line and the other test line is isolated using double block-and-bleed valves. The lines can accommodate nominal pipe sizes from 3” to 16”, and larger sizes with limited upstream piping. The system can operate at line pressures up to 7 bar (100 psi (g)) with flow rates up to 1,270 m3/h (8,000 bbl/h).

NEL


Figure 1 provides a schematic diagram of the flow circuits. The oil for the 11.5 m3 (3,000 gal) closed test circuit is drawn from one (1) of four (4) 11.5 m3 (3,000 gal) supply tanks. The system is pressurized with a screw pump upstream of two (2) variable speed positive displacement pump that control the flow rate. The fluid continually passed through a 25 ton chiller to maintain the fluid at a predetermined temperature from 21°C to 43°C (70°F to 110°F). Each test line can accommodate up to 7.6 m (25 ft) of horizontal straight lengths or alternative configurations as required. At the outlet of each test section, the fluid can be directed through the Small Volume meter Prover (SVP) and / or one of the two (2) the Master flowmeters. The SVP and / or the Master Meters are isolated from the test system using double-block-and-bleed valves when not in use. There is a transfer pump system to change the test fluid in the test circuit.

Figure 1 Schematic Diagram of the FMC Technologies MV Test System The “Meter Under Test” (MUT) can be calibrated by the Direct Proving Method (DPM) or by the Master Meter Proving Method (MMPM). When using the MMPM the master meter is first calibrated over flow rate at operating conditions prior to calibrating the MUT. The “Running Start-and-Stop” gate method is used for both the DP and MM prove methods. The DP method utilizes the SVP to gate “prove run”. For the MMP method the MUT is used to gate the “prove run”. The Master Prover is the primary reference standard for the MV Test System. It was gravimetrically calibrated at the manufactures facility Honeywell Enraf Americas, Inc. Roswell, GA USA to an expanded uncertainty of 0.016% at k=2. The NVLAP accreditation range and proficiency test range are listed in Appendix E. 2.2 NEL Test Facilities The UK National Standards Oil Flow Facility, located at NEL in Glasgow, Scotland, consist of two separate flow circuits (A and B), each with a high capacity and a low capacity flow line. These can accommodate nominal pipe sizes from 0.5” to 10”, and can operate at line pressures up to 10 bar. Test fluids can be delivered at flowrates up to 720 m3/h.

NEL


Figure 2 provides a schematic diagram of one of the flow circuits. The oil for each circuit is drawn from a 30 m3 supply tank into the suction stream of the main pumps, from where it is discharged to the test lines. A conditioning circuit, linked to each tank, maintains the oil temperature to within ± 1 ºC of a pre-selected value (itself set in the range 5 – 45 ºC). Each test line can accommodate up to 30 m of horizontal straight lengths or alternative configurations as required. At the outlet of each test section, a manifold directs the fluid back to the storage tank or to one of the calibrated weigh tanks. Line temperature and pressure are monitored both upstream and downstream of the test section.

Figure 2 Schematic Diagram of the NEL Oil Flow Test Facility

The flow lines share a common primary standard weighbridge system consisting of four separate weightanks of 150, 600, 1500 and 6000 kg capacity. The facility is fully traceable to National Standards and is accredited by the United Kingdom Accreditation Service (UKAS). For ‘primary’ calibrations, a gravimetric ‘standing-start-and-finish’ method is used to determine the quantity of fluid (volume or mass) which has passed through the flowmeter under test and into the selected weightank. The gravimetric weightanks constitute the primary reference standard of the NEL oil flow facility. Using the above technique, the overall expanded uncertainty in the quantity of fluid passed through the MUT is 0.03 % at k = 2 (approximating to 95% confidence). This applies to oils with a kinematic viscosity between 2 – 30 cSt. For oils with a kinematic viscosity greater than 30 cSt, the overall expanded uncertainty in the quantity of fluid passed through the MUT is 0.25 % at k = 2 (approximating to 95% confidence). In the evaluation programme for the low viscosity data (2 cSt), the oil flow facility was operated in ‘standing-start-and-finish’ mode and the test meter compared against the primary gravimetric reference system. As such, the overall uncertainty in the quantity of fluid passed through the MUT, is 0.03 % (k = 2). In the evaluation programme for the high viscosity data (200 cSt), the oil flow facility was operated in ‘standing-start-and-finish’ mode and the test meter compared against the primary gravimetric reference system. As such, the overall uncertainty in the quantity of fluid passed, is 0.25 % (k = 2).

NEL


2.3 Intercomparison Package The intercomparison package was supplied by NEL. The transfer flow meter used in the intercomparison programme was a 200 mm (8 inch) rotary-vane, positive displacement flowmeter serial number LK143770, manufactured by FMC Technologies Smith MetersTM. (Figure 3).

Figure 3 Smith MetersTM PD Reference Flowmeter Installed at NEL This package met the requirements and had a good track record of stability and repeatability when used over a number of years at NEL as a master reference flowmeter. This package was selected for its flow range, history and capability. The meter was configured to provide a pulsed output with a nominal K-factor of 10 Pulses/litre (P/L).

Figure 4 Smith MetersTM PD Reference Flowmeter Installed at FMC

NEL


The positive displacement flowmeter provided an output of electronic pulses proportional to the volumetric flow. The performance indicator for the intercomparison was chosen to be K-factor. K-factor is a term used to describe the performance of meters, such as positive displacement meters, whose output is in the form of a series of electrical pulses, and where the total pulse count, (n) is proportional to the volume (VT) passed, and the pulse frequency; (dn/dt) is proportional to the flowrate. It is defined as:

T

F V

nK (1)

2.4 Test Conditions Both laboratories used different test fluids for the intercomparison. Two nominal fluid viscosities, 2 cSt and 200 cSt, were selected for the intercomparison. For the low viscosity comparison, NEL used an EXXON kerosene substitute with a nominal viscosity of approximately 2 cSt at 28 °C. For the high viscosity comparison, NEL used a white mineral oil, Siptech, with a nominal viscosity of approximately 200 cSt at 28 °C. For the low viscosity comparison FMC used a kerosene/gas oil substitute with a nominal viscosity of approximately 3.3 cSt at 28°C. For the high viscosity comparison, FMC used refined lubricating oil, with a nominal viscosity of approximately 400 cSt at 28 °C. Tests were carried out in both laboratories at a temperature of 28 °C using the low viscosity fluid. However the high viscosity fluid tests were completed at 28 °C at NEL and 36 °C at FMC. Deviation in the temperature and viscosity of the fluid can cause significant change in the response of rotary-vane positive displacement devices. The differences in viscosity and temperature can produce different K-factors at a given volumetric flowrates. To ensure that the influence of viscosity and temperature differences on the comparison was minimised, the high viscosity comparison was carried out at nominally the same kinematic viscosity (approximately 200 cSt) and a temperature correction factor derived by NEL applied to normalise the results to a common reference temperature. This procedure was also followed for the low viscosity comparison at a kinematic viscosity of approximately 2.6 cSt.. This meant that several test conditions were completed at both NEL and FMC. The NEL test conditions and the FMC test conditions have been summarised in Tables 1 and 2 respectively.

Test conditions A1 – E1 and F – J were completed in August 2011. Test conditions F – J were repeated in December 2011 after the test work at FMC had been completed and the flowmeter returned to NEL. Tests A2 – E2 were completed in December 2011 to match the low viscosity tests completed at FMC in October 2011.

NEL


TABLE 1

NEL INTERCOMPARISON TEST MATRIX

Test Condition

Flow Kin. Visc Temp Repeats

[l/s] [cSt] [°C]

A1 10 2.0 28 5

B1 30 2.0 28 5

C1 50 2.0 28 5

D1 70 2.0 28 5

E1 90 2.0 28 5

A2 10 2.6 16 5

B2 30 2.6 16 5

C2 50 2.6 16 5

D2 70 2.6 16 5

E2 90 2.6 16 5

F 10 200 28 5

G 30 200 28 5

H 50 200 28 5

I 70 200 28 5

J 90 200 28 5

TABLE 2

FMC INTERCOMPARISON TEST MATRIX

Test Condition

Flow Kin. Visc Temp Repeats

[l/s] [cSt] [°C]

K1 10 2.6 40 5

L1 30 2.6 40 5

M1 50 2.6 40 5

N1 70 2.6 40 5

O1 90 2.6 40 5

K2 10 3.3 28 5

L2 30 3.3 28 5

M2 50 3.3 28 5

N2 70 3.3 28 5

O2 90 3.3 28 5

P 10 220 36 5

Q 30 220 36 5

R 50 220 36 5

S 70 220 36 5

T 90 220 36 5

NEL


3 CONDUCT OF THE INTERCOMPARSION The package was set up and calibrated at NEL. The results were recorded and analysed according to NEL’s quality system procedures. The package was then shipped to FMC’s test facility in Erie, PA, and was installed and then calibrated according to FMC’s quality system procedures. The installation set up and test was witnessed by an NEL representative. No modifications were made to the flowmeter. The meter was then returned to NEL where it was again tested according to the test matrix outlined in Table 1. Following the FMC calibration the results were provided to NEL for analysis and reporting. In both sets of tests, a number of repeat points were carried out at each flowrate. A minimum number of five repeat points were collected at each flowrate. After five points were collected the uncertainty of the mean was tested by ensuring that the spread of results fell within 0.05%. If the spread was outside 0.05% additional points were collected until the spread of results fell within the tabulated values given in the API Manual of Petroleum Measurement Standards, Chapter 4.8, Table A – 1. This table provides spread values which will give an uncertainty in the mean of better than ±0.027% for any given number of test points. The uncertainty of the mean value is defined as:

n

tU r

(2)

Where t is Students t value for n results at 95% confidence, σ is the sample standard deviation of the results and n is the number of test points. 4 TEMPERATURE CORRECTION The “K-factor” of the flowmeter selected for the intercomparison programme can be considered to be a function of three main parameters: the volumetric flowrate (Q), the liquid viscosity () and the fluid temperature (T). The volumetric flowrate and liquid viscosity of the test fluid for the two laboratories was preselected to ensure good agreement between the two facilities. However, although it was possible to match the fluid viscosity or fluid temperature between the two facilities, it was not possible to match both simultaneously. As such, fluid viscosity was matched and the fluid temperature altered between the two test laboratories. To correct for the effect of temperature on the flowmeter, a temperature correction was devised from previous test data and applied to the device. The temperature correction applied is defined as: TKK FTCF (3)

Where KF is the devices uncorrected K-factor value, α is the temperature correction factor and ΔT is the temperature difference between the two calibration fluids.

NEL


From an examination of previous test data collected at NEL for this meter, the temperature coefficient, α, for the device was found to be 0.0007 P.L-1.°C-1. 5 TEST RESULTS The results of the NEL calibrations are given in Appendices A and B in the form of test certificates. The results of the FMC calibrations are given in Appendices C and D in the form of report tables. The low and high viscosity results from the NEL comparisons are summarised in Tables 3 and 4 respectively. The low and high viscosity results (temperature corrected and uncorrected) from the FMC comparisons are summarised in Tables 5 and 6. The intercomparison is shown graphically for both meters in Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8. The type A uncertainty based on the repeatability of each test is given in Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6. This uncertainty contribution is calculated as shown in equation (4). The overall uncertainty for each test flowrate was calculated by combining the repeatability uncertainty of the mean (Ur) with the reference uncertainty (Ul) quoted by each laboratory.

22

rl UUU (4)

These uncertainty bands are shown as error bars around each test point on the graphs (Figures 5, 6, 7 and 8). The length of each bar indicates the overall uncertainty. The equivalence of the laboratories can be quantified by calculating the normalised deviation, or equivalence, in the form of the En value1:

22

FMCNEL

FMCNELn

UU

KKE

(5)

where K is the mean K-factor from NEL’s or FMC’s results at a mean flowrate and U is the combined uncertainty from NEL or FMC data set as applicable. If En is less than 1, there is equivalence between the results within 95% confidence limits. The results are summarised in Table 7. At all flowrates the value En is less than 1 showing that equivalence has been established between the NEL and FMC results. 6 CONCLUSION It can be concluded from the results in Section 4 that the FMC Technologies oil flow calibration laboratory and the corresponding UK National standards operated by NEL are equivalent in terms of their reference measurements of volume passed through the meter under test. This result validates the traceability of the FMC laboratory and its associated statement of uncertainty. It is underpinned by the ISO 17025 accreditation of the NEL facility. This is reinforced by the position of NEL as custodian of the UK National Standard for flow measurement and hence the inclusion of the facilities in regular internationally recognised intercomparison exercises.

1 K. Beissner (2002), On a measure of constancy in comparison measurements, Metrologia 2002, 39, 59-63

NEL


TABLE 3

SUMMARY OF NEL LOW VISCOSITY RESULTS

Date Sep-11 Laboratory Uncertainty 0.03 %

No of points

Flowrate K- factor Spread Spread abs Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.06133 0.00029 0.0000289 0.01387 0.0001387 0.03305 0.003332 5 30 10.06951 0.00027 0.0000269 0.01590 0.0001590 0.03395 0.003423 5 50 10.07044 0.00011 0.0000111 0.00602 0.0000602 0.03060 0.003084 5 70 10.07107 0.00012 0.0000121 0.00665 0.0000665 0.03073 0.003095 5 90 10.07341 0.00013 0.0000127 0.00598 0.0000598 0.03059 0.00308

Date Dec-11 Laboratory Uncertainty 0.03 %

No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.06210 0.00030 0.0000301 0.01347 0.0001347 0.03289 0.003312 5 30 10.06712 0.00016 0.0000158 0.00818 0.0000818 0.03110 0.003133 5 50 10.06835 0.00021 0.0000213 0.01133 0.0001133 0.03207 0.003234 5 70 10.07162 0.00014 0.0000138 0.00743 0.0000743 0.03091 0.003115 5 90 10.07475 0.00021 0.0000213 0.00988 0.0000988 0.03159 0.00318

NEL Low Viscosity Results Meter LK143770

NEL Low Viscosity Results Meter LK143770 (Repeat)

NEL


TABLE 4

SUMMARY OF NEL HIGH VISCOSITY RESULTS

Date Sep-11 Laboratory Uncertainty 0.25 %

No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.05682 0.0004 0.0000419 0.0200 0.0001998 0.25080 0.025222 5 30 10.05577 0.0002 0.0000193 0.0098 0.0000980 0.25019 0.025163 5 50 10.05616 0.0003 0.0000259 0.0129 0.0001289 0.25033 0.025174 6 70 10.05419 0.0002 0.0000241 0.0103 0.0001034 0.25021 0.025165 5 90 10.05154 0.0003 0.0000311 0.0152 0.0001520 0.25046 0.02518

Date Nov-11 Laboratory Uncertainty 0.25 %

No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.05513 0.0001 0.0000072 0.0034 0.0000336 0.25002 0.025142 5 30 10.05603 0.0003 0.0000294 0.0159 0.0001592 0.25051 0.025193 5 50 10.05684 0.0001 0.0000146 0.0065 0.0000651 0.25008 0.025154 6 70 10.05576 0.0003 0.0000263 0.0134 0.0001345 0.25036 0.025185 5 90 10.05471 0.0003 0.0000319 0.0162 0.0001622 0.25053 0.02519

NEL High Viscosity Results Meter LK143770 (Repeat)

NEL High Viscosity Results Meter LK143770

Note: the higher uncertainty value relates to the high viscosity fluid utilised as explained in section 2.2.

NEL


TABLE 5

SUMMARY OF FMC LOW VISCOSITY RESULTS

Laboratory Uncertainty 0.046 %

No of points

Flowrate K- factor Spread Spread abs

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 9 10 10.04347 0.1040% 0.00010 0.0255 0.00025 0.0526 0.005282 5 30 10.05002 0.0350% 0.00004 0.0176 0.00018 0.0492 0.004953 5 50 10.05419 0.0050% 0.00001 0.0034 0.00003 0.0461 0.004644 5 70 10.05273 0.0163% 0.00002 0.0084 0.00008 0.0468 0.004705 5 90 10.05848 0.0125% 0.00001 0.0073 0.00007 0.0466 0.00468

Temperature Correction 0.0007 P/L/°C


No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.06048 0.00106 0.00011 0.0261 0.0003 0.0529 0.005322 5 30 10.06703 0.00035 0.00004 0.0177 0.0002 0.0493 0.004963 5 50 10.07131 0.00005 0.00001 0.0036 0.0000 0.0461 0.004654 5 70 10.06992 0.00016 0.00002 0.0084 0.0001 0.0468 0.004715 5 90 10.07573 0.00013 0.00001 0.0074 0.0001 0.0466 0.00469


No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 8 10 10.04833 0.0964% 0.00010 0.0269 0.00027 0.0533 0.005352 5 30 10.05595 0.0369% 0.00004 0.0170 0.00017 0.0490 0.004933 5 50 10.05763 0.0138% 0.00001 0.0074 0.00007 0.0466 0.004694 5 70 10.06162 0.0119% 0.00001 0.0057 0.00006 0.0463 0.004665 5 90 10.06698 0.0112% 0.00001 0.0058 0.00006 0.0464 0.00467

FMC Low Viscosity 2.6cSt Temp Corrected Results Meter LK143770

FMC Low 2.6cSt Viscosity Results Meter LK143770

FMC Low 3.3cSt Viscosity Results Meter LK143770

NEL


TABLE 6

SUMMARY OF FMC HIGH VISCOSITY RESULTS


No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.04908 0.0419% 0.00004 0.0237 0.00024 0.0518 0.005202 5 30 10.04861 0.0476% 0.00005 0.0214 0.00021 0.0507 0.005103 5 50 10.04469 0.0050% 0.00001 0.0027 0.00003 0.0461 0.004634 5 70 10.04629 0.0106% 0.00001 0.0054 0.00005 0.0463 0.004655 5 90 10.04319 0.0338% 0.00003 0.0150 0.00015 0.0484 0.00486

Temperature Correction 0.0007 P/L/°C


No of points


Uncertainty A

Uncertainty A

Uncertainty total

Uncertainty total

l/s p/l % % %1 5 10 10.05515 0.00046 0.00005 0.0265 0.0003 0.0531 0.005342 5 30 10.05454 0.00049 0.00005 0.0220 0.0002 0.0510 0.005123 5 50 10.05066 0.00005 0.00000 0.0023 0.0000 0.0461 0.004634 5 70 10.05206 0.00010 0.00001 0.0054 0.0001 0.0463 0.004665 5 90 10.04882 0.00034 0.00003 0.0152 0.0002 0.0485 0.00487

FMC High Viscosity Temperature Corrected Results Meter LK143770

FMC High Viscosity Results Meter LK143770

NEL


TABLE 7

SUMMARY RESULTS AND EQUIVALENCE RATIO

Average Flowrate

Average K - F

UABS Average Flowrate

Average K - F

UABS Mean Flowrate

En Ratio

10 10.0621 0.0033 10 10.0605 0.0053 10 0.2588830 10.0671 0.0031 30 10.0670 0.0050 30 0.0148150 10.0684 0.0032 50 10.0713 0.0046 50 -0.5235270 10.0716 0.0031 70 10.0699 0.0047 70 0.3014290 10.0748 0.0032 90 10.0757 0.0047 90 -0.17186

Average Flowrate

Average K - F

UABS Average Flowrate

Average K - F

UABS Mean Flowrate

En Ratio

10 10.0568 0.0252 10 10.0552 0.0053 10 0.0647230 10.0558 0.0252 30 10.0545 0.0051 30 0.0479650 10.0562 0.0252 50 10.0507 0.0046 50 0.2147070 10.0542 0.0252 70 10.0521 0.0047 70 0.0834790 10.0515 0.0252 90 10.0488 0.0049 90 0.10611

2.6cSt @ 16degC 2.6cSt @ 40degC

200cSt @ 27degC 220cSt @ 36degC

High Viscosity En Ratio for Flowmeter LK143770

NEL FMC

Low Viscosity En Ratio for Flowmeter LK143770

NEL FMC

Note: The temperature correction detailed in section 4 has been applied to the FMC low viscosity (2.6 cSt) data.

NEL


10.015

10.025

10.035

10.045

10.055

10.065

10.075

10.085

10.095

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

K-F

ac

tor

[Pu

lse

s/l

itre

]

Reference. Vol. Flow [Litre/second]

8 " FMC PD Meter SN: LK143770K - Factor

NEL 2.6 cSt (16degC)

FMC MM 2.6 cSt (40degC)

Uncertainty bars at k=2

Bar indicates overall uncertainty

Figure 5 Low Viscosity Comparison for Flowmeter LK143770

10.015

10.025

10.035

10.045

10.055

10.065

10.075

10.085

10.095

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

K-F

act

or

[Pu

lse

s/li

tre

]



NEL 2.6 cSt (16degC)

FMC MM 2.6 cSt (40degC) Temp Corrected



Figure 6 Low Viscosity Temperature Corrected Comparison for Flowmeter LK143770

NEL


10.015

10.025

10.035

10.045

10.055

10.065

10.075

10.085

10.095

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

K-F

ac

tor

[Pu

lse

s/l

itre

]



NEL 200 cSt (27degC)

FMC MM 220 cSt (36degC)







Figure 7 High Viscosity Comparison for Flowmeter LK143770

10.015

10.025

10.035

10.045

10.055

10.065

10.075

10.085

10.095

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

K-F

ac

tor

[Pu

lse

s/l

itre

]



NEL 200 cSt (27degC)

FMC MM 220 cSt (36degC) Temp Corrected



Figure 8 High Viscosity Temperature Corrected Comparison for Flowmeter LK143770

NEL


0009

APPENDIX A

NEL CERTIFICATES FOR

LOW VISCOSITY TESTS FOR METER LK143770

This certificate is consistent with the calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs) that are included in Appendix C of the Mutual Recognition .Arrangement (MRA)drawn up by the International Committee for Weights and. Measures (CIPM). Under the MRA, all participating institutes recognize the validity of each other’s calibration and measurement certificates for the quantities, ranges and measurement uncertainties specified in Appendix C (for details see http://www.bipm.org).

NEL


Page 1 of 4Issued By: TUV NEL Ltd

TUV NEL Limited 0009

East KilbrideGlasgow G75 0QFUnited Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)1355 220222Fax: +44 (0)1355 272999 R.Paton

e-mail: [email protected] Date of Issue:web: www.tuvnel.comTitle:

Customer: FMC Technologies Date Received:Address: 1602 Wagner Avenue Date of Test:

Erie16510 Job/Project No:USA Responsible Operator:

Test Meter: Description:Manufacturer:Type/ Model:

Output Signal Type:Nominal Size:

Serial No:Customer Tag No/ID:

Condition & Treatment:

Configuration Settings:

Test Conditions: Flow Range, Min: 36 m3/hr (Approximate specification)

Max: 324 m3/hrNominal Temperature: 26 °C

Nominal Pressure: 2 BarTest Fluid: Kerosene

Nom. Viscosity: 2 cSt at 26 °CNom. Density: 0.789 kg/l at 26 °C

Pipe Straight Lengths: Upstream: Downstream: (diameters)

Distribution: No.of copies: 1 NEL Project File Format: Electronic1 FMC Technologies PDF

27-Jan-12

Certificate No:

Additional Test Information:

CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION

Approved Signatory

This certificate is issued in accordance with the laboratory accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. Itprovides traceability of measurement to recognised national standards, and to units of measurement realised at the National PhysicalLaboratory or other recognised national standards laboratories. This certificate may not be reproduced other than in full, except with theprior written approval of the issuing laboratory.

H-8 SmithMeter Pulse8 - inchLK143770M21

Bi-lateral intercomparison of oil flow facilities between NEL and FMC Technologies

TUV NEL is the trading name of TUV NEL Limited, registered in Scotland at East Kilbride, Glasgow , G75 0QF, UKRegistered number: SC215164. TUV NEL Ltd is a company of the TÜV SÜD Group.

22-Jul-1122-Jul-11

Ronnie Rushworth

Very good

Additional Information On

Device:

Postive Displacement DeviceFMC TECHNOLOGIES

NEL


CERTIFICATE OF CALIBRATION CERTIFICATE NUMBER: Title: Page 2 of 4

For:Using: NEL Oil Flow Facility (UKAS Calib.Lab.No.0009) Date of Issue: 27-Jan-12


The uncertainty in the density of fluid at the meter under test is estimated as 0.02 per cent.

RESULTS

FMC Technologies

The device was calibrated by comparison of the output value with the value derived from a reference gravimetric weighing system. The method used was a standing-start-and-finish technique where the flow was started quickly and stopped at the end of the test.

The uncertainty in the derived performance indicator of K-Factor or error due to the resolution of the meter output of ±1 pulse / unit varies according to the quantity collected and should be added to the above uncertainty for each test point.

The flowmeter package was installed in the TUV NEL National Standards Oil Flow Measurement Facility, as shown in Figure 1.

TEST FACILITIES, MEASUREMENTS AND METHOD

Using the test method outlined, the uncertainty in the measurement of the quantity of fluid passed through the device under test is estimated to be 0.03 per cent.

The results are tabulated in Table 1 and shown graphically in Figure 2. Test Point numbering may be non-consecutive due to intermediate checks, which are not shown.

The flowrate was calculated using the time taken for the quantity of fluid to pass through the meter. All measurements are fully traceable to National Standards.

UNCERTAINTYThe uncertainty estimates quoted are expanded uncertainties based on a standard uncertainty multiplied by a coverage factor k=2. This provides a level of confidence of approximately 95%. The uncertainty estimate has been carried out in accordance with the methods recommended in international standards (GUM and ISO 5168). Components of uncertainty given below can be added by root sum square methods to give overall uncertainty in the given parameters. If not specifically stated, additional uncertainty has to be estimated and added by the user, based on the spread or repeatability of the data and the influence factors present when the instrument is in service.

The K-Factor (K) of the device under test was derived from the total number of pulses (P) output by the device divided by the reference quantity (Q):

QP

K

NEL




Table 1Summary Report Facility: NEL Oil Flow Facility

Test Desc: 8 Inch PD Meter IntercomparisonQuantity Type: Volume

Device Under Test: Test Details:Description: M21 PD Meter Project No.: FGTR11

Serial No: <n/a> Test No.: 8031-s1NEL DAQ ID: 25 Test Date: 22-Jul-11

Fluid Properties: Operator: CRDensity @ 20°C: kg/l Calib. Method: Gravimetric

Exp. Factor: /°C Line ID: B

Test Point

Collection Date & Time

Ave. Temp. Ave. Press.g

Fluid Density

Fluid Kin. Viscosity

Tank Fill Total Corr. Mass

Total Corr. Volume

Ref. Mass Flow

Ref. Vol. Flow

Meter Signal

Frequency Meter Est. Value

K Factor

°C Bar.g kg/m³ cSt sec kg litre kg/s litre/s Pulses Hz litre/s Pulses/litre1 22/07/11 15:05 31.14 1.62 789.69 2.0 82.23 5787.485 7328.81 70.378 89.121 73827 897.76 89.78 10.0742 22/07/11 15:12 31.14 1.62 789.69 2.0 82.20 5784.782 7325.42 70.374 89.117 73793 897.72 89.77 10.0743 22/07/11 15:21 31.10 1.62 789.72 2.0 82.38 5797.298 7340.99 70.372 89.110 73952 897.68 89.77 10.0744 22/07/11 15:29 31.07 1.62 789.73 2.0 82.30 5790.789 7332.58 70.363 89.098 73865 897.53 89.75 10.0745 22/07/11 15:37 31.08 1.62 789.73 2.0 81.68 5746.530 7276.59 70.352 89.084 73294 897.31 89.73 10.0736 22/07/11 15:48 30.96 1.63 789.82 2.0 104.69 5768.759 7303.91 55.104 69.768 73555 702.61 70.26 10.0717 22/07/11 15:56 30.78 1.63 789.95 2.0 104.54 5759.845 7291.40 55.098 69.749 73427 702.40 70.24 10.0708 22/07/11 16:05 30.66 1.63 790.04 2.0 105.38 5807.308 7350.68 55.107 69.752 74031 702.50 70.25 10.0719 22/07/11 16:13 30.55 1.63 790.11 2.0 105.32 5802.401 7343.75 55.095 69.730 73963 702.29 70.23 10.07210 22/07/11 16:21 30.47 1.63 790.17 2.0 104.64 5766.452 7297.74 55.106 69.739 73499 702.38 70.24 10.07111 22/07/11 17:23 30.89 1.47 789.86 2.0 146.63 5798.899 7341.71 39.549 50.071 73930 504.21 50.42 10.07012 22/07/11 17:33 30.55 1.47 790.10 2.0 146.09 5777.567 7312.46 39.547 50.053 73637 504.04 50.40 10.07013 22/07/11 17:42 30.22 1.48 790.34 2.0 145.75 5766.550 7296.32 39.564 50.060 73481 504.15 50.42 10.07114 22/07/11 17:52 29.90 1.48 790.57 2.0 146.47 5797.289 7333.06 39.581 50.067 73847 504.19 50.42 10.07015 22/07/11 18:01 29.61 1.48 790.78 2.0 146.64 5803.495 7338.98 39.575 50.046 73910 504.01 50.40 10.07116 22/07/11 18:14 29.12 1.48 791.13 2.1 186.75 4479.714 5662.39 23.988 30.321 57008 305.26 30.53 10.06817 22/07/11 18:23 28.81 1.48 791.35 2.1 187.64 4501.842 5688.78 23.991 30.317 57277 305.24 30.52 10.06818 22/07/11 18:39 28.33 1.48 791.71 2.1 187.35 4495.530 5678.28 23.996 30.309 57183 305.23 30.52 10.07019 22/07/11 18:47 28.12 1.48 791.86 2.1 187.56 4492.525 5673.40 23.952 30.248 57133 304.61 30.46 10.07020 22/07/11 19:06 28.52 1.52 791.57 2.1 182.18 4483.515 5664.06 24.610 31.091 57040 313.10 31.31 10.07121 22/07/11 19:30 29.52 1.61 790.86 2.0 362.03 2902.999 3670.70 8.019 10.139 36925 102.00 10.20 10.05922 22/07/11 19:42 29.82 1.61 790.64 2.0 362.71 2906.705 3676.39 8.014 10.136 36991 101.98 10.20 10.06223 22/07/11 19:55 30.07 1.61 790.46 2.0 361.64 2898.495 3666.87 8.015 10.140 36897 102.03 10.20 10.06224 22/07/11 20:07 30.39 1.61 790.23 2.0 362.27 2902.101 3672.48 8.011 10.137 36951 102.00 10.20 10.06225 22/07/11 20:19 30.66 1.61 790.03 2.0 363.03 2906.708 3679.23 8.007 10.135 37019 101.97 10.20 10.062


FMC Technologies

0.797607-0.000904950

NEL




Figure 2


FMC Technologies

0.04

%

10.0

58

10.0

60

10.0

62

10.0

64

10.0

66

10.0

68

10.0

70

10.0

72

10.0

74

10.0

76

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

70.0

080

.00

90.0

010

0.00

K Factor, Pulses/litre

Ref

. Vol

. Flo

w, l

itre

/s

M2

1 P

D M

eter

, s/n

: <n

/a>

(T8

03

1-s

1, 2

2-J

ul-1

1)

NEL





Tel: +44 (0)1355 220222Fax: +44 (0)1355 272999 R.Paton











Nominal Pressure: 2 BarTest Fluid: Kerosene

Nom. Viscosity: 2.6 cSt at 26 °CNom. Density: 0.8 kg/l at 26 °C



27-Jan-12

Certificate No:



Approved Signatory

This certificate is issued in accordance with the laboratory accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. Itprovides traceability of measurement to recognised national standards, and to units of measurement realised at the National PhysicalLaboratory or other recognised national standards laboratories. This certificate may not be reproduced other than in full, except with theprior written approval of the issuing laboratory.




20-Dec-1120-Dec-11

Ronnie Rushworth

Very good


Device:


NEL




(End of Text)



RESULTS

FMC Technologies










QP

K

NEL





Test Desc: Calibration of M21 PD Meter Quantity Type: Volume


Serial No: M21 Test No.: 8092-s1NEL DAQ ID: 25 Test Date: 20-Dec-11

Fluid Properties: Operator: C RooneyDensity @ 20°C: kg/l Calib. Method: Gravimetric

Exp. Factor: /°C Line ID: BTest Point


Ave. Temp.

Ave. Press.g

Fluid Density



Total Corr. Volume

Ref. Mass Flow

Ref. Vol. Flow

Meter Signal


K Factor

°C Bar.g kg/m³ cSt sec kg litre kg/s litre/s Pulses Hz litre/s Pulses/litre1 20/12/11 20:04 15.89 1.584 800.503 2.614 113.2 4502.266 5624.30 39.78 49.70 56624.00 500.33 49.78 10.072 20/12/11 20:11 15.95 1.583 800.458 2.611 113.3 4504.469 5627.36 39.77 49.69 56656.00 500.25 49.78 10.073 20/12/11 20:18 15.95 1.584 800.457 2.611 113.1 4499.663 5621.37 39.77 49.69 56602.00 500.31 49.78 10.074 20/12/11 20:26 15.92 1.584 800.480 2.613 112.9 4488.047 5606.70 39.76 49.67 56445.00 500.01 49.75 10.075 20/12/11 20:33 15.89 1.585 800.497 2.614 113.2 4500.864 5622.59 39.76 49.66 56617.00 500.09 49.76 10.076 20/12/11 20:44 15.97 1.642 800.449 2.610 104.1 5817.909 7268.31 55.90 69.83 73206.00 703.34 69.98 10.077 20/12/11 20:53 15.99 1.640 800.435 2.610 103.8 5809.999 7258.55 55.96 69.91 73109.00 704.19 70.07 10.078 20/12/11 21:00 15.99 1.642 800.435 2.609 103.3 5770.847 7209.64 55.88 69.81 72610.00 703.04 69.95 10.079 20/12/11 21:10 16.01 1.642 800.417 2.608 103.5 5781.061 7222.56 55.86 69.79 72746.00 702.93 69.94 10.0710 20/12/11 21:21 16.02 1.640 800.412 2.608 103.1 5773.351 7212.97 55.99 69.95 72640.00 704.48 70.10 10.0711 20/12/11 21:35 16.11 1.751 800.356 2.604 80.6 5739.807 7171.57 71.25 89.03 72244.00 896.81 89.24 10.0712 21/12/11 14:28 16.32 1.754 800.200 2.593 81.2 5784.568 7228.90 71.20 88.98 72837.00 896.50 89.20 10.0813 21/12/11 14:37 16.71 1.754 799.920 2.574 81.7 5812.608 7266.49 71.17 88.97 73205.00 896.35 89.19 10.0714 21/12/11 14:45 16.83 1.755 799.834 2.568 81.1 5772.656 7217.32 71.17 88.99 72715.00 896.55 89.21 10.0815 21/12/11 14:52 16.98 1.754 799.725 2.561 81.0 5765.147 7208.91 71.18 89.01 72629.00 896.77 89.23 10.0717 21/12/11 16:33 16.39 1.494 800.136 2.590 119.1 2886.426 3607.42 24.24 30.29 36315.00 304.91 30.34 10.0718 21/12/11 16:40 16.37 1.494 800.145 2.590 118.7 2878.316 3597.24 24.24 30.29 36216.00 304.99 30.35 10.0719 21/12/11 16:47 16.36 1.494 800.158 2.591 118.8 2881.119 3600.69 24.25 30.30 36245.00 305.02 30.35 10.0720 21/12/11 16:54 16.33 1.494 800.178 2.593 119.0 2885.225 3605.73 24.25 30.30 36301.00 305.08 30.36 10.0721 21/12/11 17:00 16.28 1.494 800.215 2.595 119.7 2904.250 3629.34 24.25 30.31 36538.00 305.13 30.36 10.0723 21/12/11 17:54 16.15 1.499 800.310 2.602 375.7 2896.539 3619.27 7.71 9.63 36412.00 96.91 9.64 10.0624 21/12/11 18:07 16.22 1.500 800.254 2.598 376.1 2899.844 3623.65 7.71 9.63 36463.00 96.95 9.65 10.0625 21/12/11 18:21 16.31 1.502 800.188 2.593 375.0 2893.736 3616.32 7.72 9.64 36387.00 97.03 9.65 10.0626 21/12/11 18:32 16.26 1.502 800.227 2.596 375.9 2900.144 3624.15 7.72 9.64 36472.00 97.03 9.66 10.0627 21/12/11 18:43 16.18 1.502 800.288 2.600 375.9 2900.845 3624.75 7.72 9.64 36472.00 97.02 9.65 10.06


FMC Technologies

0.797431-0.000903316

NEL




Figure 2


FMC Technologies

0.04

%

10.0

58

10.0

60

10.0

62

10.0

64

10.0

66

10.0

68

10.0

70

10.0

72

10.0

74

10.0

76

10.0

78

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

70.0

080

.00

90.0

010

0.00


Ref

. Vol

. Flo

w, l

itre

/s

M2

1 P

D M

eter

, s/n

: M2

1(T

80

92

-s1

, 20

-Dec

-11)

NEL


0009

APPENDIX B

NEL CERTIFICATES FOR

HIGH VISCOSITY TESTS FOR METER LK143770

This certificate is consistent with the calibration and measurement capabilities (CMCs) that are included in Appendix C of the Mutual Recognition .Arrangement (MRA)drawn up by the International Committee for Weights and. Measures (CIPM). Under the MRA, all participating institutes recognize the validity of each other’s calibration and measurement certificates for the quantities, ranges and measurement uncertainties specified in Appendix C (for details see http://www.bipm.org).

NEL





Tel: +44 (0)1355 220222Fax: +44 (0)1355 272999 R.Paton











Nominal Pressure: 2 BarTest Fluid: Siptech




27-Jan-12

Certificate No:



Approved Signatory

This cert ificate is issued in accordance with the laboratory accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditation Service. Itprovides traceability of measurement to recognised national standards, and to units of measurement realised at the National PhysicalLaboratory or other recognised national standards laboratories. This certificate may not be reproduced other than in full, except with theprior written approval of the issuing laboratory.




05-Jul-1105-Jul-11

Ronnie Rushworth

Very good


Device:


NEL






RESULTS

FMC Technologies





Using the test method outlined, the uncertainty in the measurement of the quantity of fluid passed through the device under test is estimated to be 0.25per cent.





QP

K

NEL





Test Desc: FMC 8 inch PD Meter Intercomparison Quantity Type: Volume


Serial No: M21 Test No.: 8023-s1NEL DAQ ID: 25 Test Date: 05-Jul-11

Fluid Properties: Operator: RRDensity @ 20°C: kg/l Calib. Method: Gravimetric

Exp. Factor: /°C Line ID: A

Test Point


Ave. Temp.

Ave. Press.g

Fluid Density



Total Corr. Volume

Ref. Mass Flow

Ref. Vol. Flow

Meter Signal Frequency Meter Est. Value

K Factor

°C Bar.g kg/m³ cSt sec kg litre kg/s litre/s Pulses Hz litre/s Pulses/litre4 05/07/11 15:18 27.26 2.60 861.32 200.45 74.742 5760.33 6687.82 77.069 89.48 67234 899.55 89.51 10.05325 05/07/11 15:30 27.18 2.57 861.37 201.39 75.362 5811.70 6747.07 77.117 89.53 67818 899.90 89.54 10.05156 05/07/11 15:43 27.25 2.58 861.32 200.61 75.777 5838.73 6778.78 77.051 89.46 68142 899.24 89.48 10.05227 05/07/11 16:00 27.42 2.56 861.22 198.68 75.466 5804.39 6739.74 76.914 89.31 67735 897.56 89.31 10.05018 05/07/11 16:13 27.79 2.56 860.99 194.50 75.414 5798.88 6735.15 76.894 89.31 67693 897.62 89.32 10.050710 06/07/11 09:01 27.23 2.14 861.31 200.85 96.398 5820.01 6757.16 60.375 70.10 67939 704.77 70.13 10.054411 06/07/11 09:13 27.41 2.15 861.20 198.81 96.466 5848.84 6791.51 60.631 70.40 68280 707.82 70.43 10.053712 06/07/11 09:25 26.96 2.16 861.48 203.97 96.198 5831.72 6769.45 60.622 70.37 68061 707.51 70.40 10.054113 06/07/11 09:36 26.87 2.15 861.53 205.02 95.975 5813.10 6747.41 60.569 70.30 67846 706.91 70.34 10.055114 06/07/11 10:02 26.93 2.14 861.49 204.30 95.972 5809.09 6743.06 60.529 70.26 67802 706.48 70.30 10.055115 06/07/11 10:17 26.93 2.15 861.50 204.35 95.235 5774.75 6703.17 60.637 70.39 67385 707.56 70.40 10.052716 06/07/11 10:33 26.77 1.84 861.58 206.33 132.868 5805.49 6738.20 43.694 50.71 67751 509.91 50.74 10.054817 06/07/11 10:45 26.16 1.85 861.95 213.80 132.347 5800.48 6729.44 43.828 50.85 67672 511.32 50.88 10.056118 06/07/11 11:01 25.43 1.89 862.41 223.42 133.518 5822.90 6751.86 43.611 50.57 67894 508.50 50.60 10.055619 06/07/11 11:13 25.47 1.87 862.38 222.76 134.136 5807.18 6733.88 43.293 50.20 67725 504.90 50.24 10.057420 06/07/11 11:25 27.63 1.83 861.04 196.25 135.642 5821.21 6760.68 42.916 49.84 67992 501.26 49.88 10.057021 06/07/11 11:41 27.19 1.66 861.31 201.37 173.940 4507.00 5232.75 25.911 30.08 52613 302.48 30.10 10.054622 06/07/11 12:10 27.44 1.65 861.15 198.47 175.392 4519.02 5247.66 25.765 29.92 52771 300.87 29.94 10.056123 06/07/11 12:40 26.98 1.72 861.43 203.72 175.264 4509.21 5234.53 25.728 29.87 52641 300.35 29.89 10.056524 06/07/11 12:55 27.71 1.73 860.98 195.34 174.917 4501.10 5227.87 25.733 29.89 52573 300.56 29.91 10.056325 06/07/11 13:09 26.95 1.77 861.46 204.18 172.298 4495.19 5218.09 26.090 30.29 52470 304.53 30.30 10.055427 06/07/11 14:46 26.30 1.68 861.86 212.03 338.198 2914.96 3382.18 8.619 10.00 34012 100.57 10.01 10.056228 06/07/11 15:11 26.08 1.68 861.99 214.78 337.487 2911.75 3377.93 8.628 10.01 33975 100.67 10.02 10.057929 06/07/11 15:27 25.97 1.69 862.06 216.20 337.960 2917.46 3384.28 8.633 10.01 34042 100.73 10.02 10.058930 06/07/11 15:43 25.88 1.69 862.12 217.35 337.535 2917.06 3383.60 8.642 10.02 34027 100.81 10.03 10.056531 06/07/11 15:57 25.77 1.70 862.19 218.79 336.100 2908.55 3373.46 8.654 10.04 33919 100.92 10.04 10.0547


FMC Technologies

0.865670-0.000718459

NEL




Figure 2


FMC Technologies

0.1%

10.0

30

10.0

35

10.0

40

10.0

45

10.0

50

10.0

55

10.0

60

10.0

65

10.0

70

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

70.0

080

.00

90.0

010

0.00


Ref

. Vol

. Flo

w, l

itre

/s

M2

1 P

D M

eter

, s/n

: M2

1(T

80

23

-s1

, 05

-Jul

-11

)

NEL





Tel: +44 (0)1355 220222Fax: +44 (0)1355 272999 R.Paton











Nominal Pressure: 2 BarTest Fluid: Siptech




27-Jan-12

Certificate No:



Approved Signatory

This certificate is issued in accordance with the laboratory accreditation requirements of the United Kingdom Accreditat ion Service. Itprovides traceability of measurement to recognised national standards, and to units of measurement realised at the National PhysicalLaboratory or other recognised national standards laboratories. This certificate may not be reproduced other than in full, except with theprior written approval of the issuing laboratory.




02-Dec-1102-Dec-11

Ronnie Rushworth

Very good


Device:


NEL






RESULTS

FMC Technologies










QP

K

NEL





Test Desc: Cal of 3 x 8 inch PD Meters @ 25 deg CQuantity Type: Volume

Device Under Test: Test Details:Description: M21 PD Meter 3 Project No.: FHRE

Serial No: M21 Test No.: 8085-s1NEL DAQ ID: 27 Test Date: 02-Dec-11

Fluid Properties: Operator: RRDensity @ 20°C: kg/l Calib. Method: Gravimetric

Exp. Factor: /°C Line ID: ATest Point


Ave. Temp.

Ave. Press.g

Fluid Density



Total Corr. Volume

Ref. Mass Flow

Ref. Vol. Flow

Meter Signal


K Factor

°C Bar.g kg/m³ cSt sec kg litre kg/s litre/s Pulses Hz litre/s Pulses/litre3 02/12/11 15:09 25.63 1.87 861.558 194.13 222.684 5818.80 6753.813 26.130 30.329 67901 304.92 30.34 10.05374 02/12/11 15:30 25.30 1.78 861.752 198.80 226.832 5801.98 6732.773 25.578 29.682 67709 298.50 29.70 10.05665 02/12/11 15:44 25.54 1.78 861.610 195.47 227.478 5805.59 6738.065 25.522 29.621 67761 297.88 29.64 10.05646 02/12/11 15:59 25.39 1.78 861.699 197.54 227.623 5815.40 6748.756 25.548 29.649 67870 298.17 29.67 10.05677 02/12/11 16:13 25.31 1.79 861.750 198.72 226.937 5803.48 6734.534 25.573 29.676 67727 298.44 29.70 10.05678 02/12/11 16:44 25.30 1.93 861.760 198.76 133.692 5775.85 6702.388 43.203 50.133 67409 504.21 50.17 10.05759 02/12/11 16:58 25.35 1.94 861.733 198.11 133.252 5776.85 6703.759 43.353 50.309 67413 505.91 50.34 10.056010 02/12/11 17:11 25.10 1.94 861.881 201.66 134.076 5821.00 6753.833 43.416 50.373 67922 506.59 50.41 10.056811 02/12/11 17:24 24.98 1.95 861.951 203.34 132.868 5784.96 6711.470 43.539 50.512 67499 508.02 50.55 10.057312 02/12/11 17:37 24.95 1.94 861.970 203.81 133.191 5804.28 6733.741 43.579 50.557 67719 508.44 50.59 10.056713 02/12/11 18:11 24.80 2.15 862.076 206.11 97.276 5820.60 6751.842 59.836 69.409 67890 697.91 69.44 10.055014 02/12/11 18:45 25.03 2.10 861.933 202.68 97.574 5795.97 6724.385 59.401 68.915 67630 693.11 68.97 10.057415 02/12/11 18:56 25.52 2.12 861.642 195.70 96.794 5782.76 6711.324 59.743 69.336 67481 697.16 69.37 10.054816 02/12/11 19:08 25.53 2.12 861.633 195.50 97.714 5834.62 6771.583 59.711 69.300 68097 696.90 69.34 10.056317 02/12/11 19:36 25.50 2.11 861.652 195.93 96.794 5785.46 6714.387 59.771 69.368 67515 697.52 69.40 10.055318 02/12/11 19:54 25.52 2.38 861.655 195.62 75.973 5768.84 6695.070 75.933 88.125 67325 886.17 88.18 10.055919 02/12/11 20:17 25.61 2.37 861.605 194.47 75.938 5785.86 6715.218 76.191 88.430 67517 889.10 88.47 10.054320 02/12/11 20:30 25.54 2.38 861.644 195.36 75.798 5788.27 6717.697 76.364 88.626 67553 891.22 88.68 10.056021 02/12/11 20:48 25.48 2.38 861.684 196.30 75.760 5805.29 6737.137 76.627 88.927 67727 893.96 88.95 10.052822 02/12/11 21:00 25.49 2.39 861.678 196.13 75.421 5793.67 6723.709 76.818 89.149 67604 896.35 89.19 10.054623 02/12/11 21:16 25.16 1.54 861.822 200.82 330.821 2905.35 3371.168 8.782 10.190 33898 102.47 10.20 10.055324 02/12/11 21:32 25.06 1.53 861.878 202.20 333.545 2913.36 3380.242 8.735 10.134 33990 101.91 10.14 10.055525 02/12/11 21:47 25.30 1.53 861.739 198.86 331.937 2910.85 3377.882 8.769 10.176 33965 102.32 10.18 10.055126 02/12/11 22:04 25.26 1.52 861.758 199.32 332.423 2904.85 3370.837 8.738 10.140 33893 101.96 10.15 10.054827 02/12/11 22:21 25.83 1.51 861.420 191.49 334.193 2910.75 3379.018 8.710 10.111 33976 101.67 10.12 10.0550


FMC Technologies

0.864813-0.000692110

NEL




Figure 2


FMC Technologies

0.1%

10.0

30

10.0

35

10.0

40

10.0

45

10.0

50

10.0

55

10.0

60

10.0

65

10.0

70

0.00

10.0

020

.00

30.0

040

.00

50.0

060

.00

70.0

080

.00

90.0

010

0.00


Ref

. Vol

. Flo

w, l

itre

/s

M2

1 P

D M

eter

, s/n

: M2

1(T

80

85

-s1

, 02

-Dec

-11)

NEL


APPENDIX C

FMC RESULTS FOR

LOW VISCOSITY TESTS

NEL


FMC 2.6 cSt TEST RESULTS

Run Date Flow Time Viscosity Tmm Pmm CTLmm CCFmm Nmm MFmm IVmm GSVmm Tm Pm CTLm CCFm N Ivm ISVm MFm KFm KFm Temp

l/s s mm2/s °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre P/Litre P/Litre

1 05/10/11 10.069 197.953 2.6 40.389 2.241 0.978 0.979 12509 1.001 1988.8 1947.9 41.00 2.227 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1943.46 1.002 10.041 10.0492 05/10/11 10.069 197.987 2.6 40.444 2.220 0.978 0.979 12508 1.001 1988.6 1947.7 41.00 2.206 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1943.46 1.002 10.042 10.0513 05/10/11 10.069 197.875 2.6 40.667 2.241 0.978 0.979 12508 1.001 1988.6 1947.3 40.22 2.220 0.978 0.979 20002 1987.53 1944.83 1.001 10.051 10.0604 05/10/11 10.069 197.954 2.6 40.056 2.234 0.978 0.980 12508 1.001 1988.6 1948.2 40.78 2.213 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1943.86 1.002 10.041 10.0495 05/10/11 10.069 197.947 2.6 40.278 2.241 0.978 0.980 12508 1.001 1988.6 1947.9 40.39 2.220 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1944.53 1.002 10.046 10.0556 05/10/11 10.069 197.863 2.6 40.056 2.241 0.978 0.980 12507 1.001 1988.5 1948.1 40.67 2.220 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1944.05 1.002 10.043 10.0517 05/10/11 10.025 198.170 2.6 40.167 2.248 0.978 0.980 12508 1.001 1988.6 1948.1 40.67 2.227 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1944.05 1.002 10.043 10.0518 05/10/11 10.025 198.144 2.6 40.222 2.234 0.978 0.980 12507 1.001 1988.5 1947.8 41.00 2.220 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1943.46 1.002 10.041 10.0509 05/10/11 10.069 198.024 2.6 40.389 2.234 0.978 0.979 12508 1.001 1988.6 1947.8 40.78 2.213 0.978 0.978 20002 1987.53 1943.86 1.002 10.043 10.0521 05/10/11 30.075 66.209 2.6 40.333 2.227 0.978 0.978 12520 1.000 1990.5 1946.9 40.39 2.227 0.978 0.978 20003 1987.64 1944.62 1.001 10.052 10.0612 05/10/11 30.031 66.243 2.6 40.278 2.234 0.978 0.978 12525 1.000 1991.3 1947.7 40.44 2.241 0.978 0.978 20010 1988.33 1945.23 1.001 10.051 10.0593 05/10/11 30.031 66.228 2.6 40.222 2.234 0.978 0.978 12521 1.000 1990.7 1947.2 40.56 2.234 0.978 0.978 20003 1987.64 1944.35 1.001 10.049 10.0574 05/10/11 30.031 66.249 2.6 40.333 2.234 0.978 0.978 12521 1.000 1990.7 1947.1 40.50 2.241 0.978 0.978 20003 1987.64 1944.45 1.001 10.050 10.0595 05/10/11 30.031 66.253 2.6 40.333 2.234 0.978 0.978 12522 1.000 1990.8 1947.2 40.61 2.234 0.978 0.978 20003 1987.64 1944.26 1.002 10.048 10.0571 05/10/11 50.081 39.728 2.6 40.444 2.227 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.2 40.56 2.261 0.978 0.978 20003 1987.64 1944.35 1.001 10.054 10.0632 05/10/11 50.081 39.726 2.6 40.444 2.234 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.2 40.56 2.275 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.45 1.001 10.054 10.0633 05/10/11 50.081 39.726 2.6 40.444 2.234 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.2 40.61 2.275 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.35 1.001 10.054 10.0634 05/10/11 50.081 39.731 2.6 40.500 2.234 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.1 40.61 2.268 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.35 1.001 10.054 10.0635 05/10/11 50.081 39.737 2.6 40.500 2.227 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.1 40.61 2.268 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.35 1.001 10.054 10.0631 05/10/11 70.175 28.351 2.6 40.556 2.241 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.4 40.67 2.324 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.27 1.001 10.052 10.0612 05/10/11 70.175 28.350 2.6 40.556 2.234 0.978 0.978 12516 1.000 1989.9 1946.4 40.67 2.337 0.978 0.978 20005 1987.83 1944.37 1.001 10.053 10.0623 05/10/11 70.175 28.349 2.6 40.556 2.241 0.978 0.978 12515 1.000 1989.7 1946.3 40.67 2.324 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.27 1.001 10.053 10.0624 05/10/11 70.175 28.379 2.6 40.556 2.234 0.978 0.978 12528 1.000 1991.8 1948.3 40.67 2.344 0.978 0.978 20025 1989.82 1946.31 1.001 10.053 10.0625 05/10/11 70.175 28.522 2.6 40.556 2.241 0.978 0.978 12592 1.000 2002.0 1958.3 40.67 2.317 0.978 0.978 20124 1999.66 1955.93 1.001 10.052 10.0601 05/10/11 90.093 22.073 2.6 40.611 2.248 0.978 0.978 12509 1.000 1988.8 1945.4 40.72 2.420 0.978 0.978 20005 1987.83 1944.29 1.001 10.058 10.0672 05/10/11 90.093 22.074 2.6 40.611 2.241 0.978 0.978 12508 1.000 1988.6 1945.2 40.72 2.420 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.19 1.001 10.058 10.0673 05/10/11 90.093 22.082 2.6 40.667 2.248 0.978 0.978 12514 1.000 1989.6 1946.1 40.72 2.413 0.978 0.978 20014 1988.72 1945.16 1.000 10.059 10.0684 05/10/11 90.093 22.071 2.6 40.667 2.248 0.978 0.978 12509 1.000 1988.8 1945.3 40.72 2.406 0.978 0.978 20004 1987.74 1944.19 1.001 10.058 10.0675 05/10/11 90.093 22.075 2.6 40.667 2.248 0.978 0.978 12508 1.000 1988.6 1945.1 40.72 2.413 0.978 0.978 20005 1987.83 1944.29 1.000 10.059 10.068

System Master Meter Meter Under Test

NEL


FMC 3.3 cSt TEST RESULTS

Run Date Flow Time Viscosity Tmm Pmm CTLmm CCFmm Nmm MFmm IVmm GSVmm Tm Pm CTLm CPLm CCFm N Ivm ISVm MFm KFm

l/s s mm2/s °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre P/Litre

1 05/10/11 9.937 200.219 3.3 28.778 2.268 0.988 0.988 12519 1.000 1990.4 1967.4 29.611 2.241 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.43 1.002 10.0432 05/10/11 9.937 200.045 3.3 29.222 2.255 0.988 0.988 12518 1.000 1990.2 1966.6 29.278 2.227 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1964.00 1.001 10.0513 05/10/11 9.937 199.925 3.3 29.222 2.248 0.988 0.988 12518 1.000 1990.2 1966.6 29.000 2.227 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1964.48 1.001 10.0534 05/10/11 9.937 199.991 3.3 28.944 2.268 0.988 0.988 12519 1.000 1990.4 1967.1 29.111 2.248 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1964.30 1.001 10.0495 05/10/11 9.937 200.083 3.3 29.000 2.268 0.988 0.988 12518 1.000 1990.2 1966.9 29.611 2.241 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.43 1.002 10.0466 05/10/11 9.937 200.189 3.3 29.167 2.255 0.988 0.988 12518 1.000 1990.2 1966.6 29.667 2.234 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.33 1.002 10.0477 05/10/11 9.937 200.286 3.3 29.444 2.261 0.988 0.988 12519 1.000 1990.4 1966.4 29.333 2.241 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.91 1.001 10.0518 05/10/11 9.937 200.447 3.2 29.278 2.261 0.988 0.988 12518 1.000 1990.2 1966.5 29.833 2.241 0.987 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.03 1.002 10.0461 05/10/11 29.943 66.407 3.3 29.722 2.234 0.988 0.986 12529 0.999 1992.0 1965.0 29.389 2.234 0.988 1.000 0.988 20002 1987.53 1963.81 1.001 10.0582 05/10/11 29.943 66.415 3.3 29.389 2.234 0.988 0.987 12530 0.999 1992.1 1965.6 29.500 2.234 0.988 1.000 0.988 20003 1987.64 1963.72 1.001 10.0543 05/10/11 29.943 66.415 3.3 29.444 2.234 0.988 0.987 12529 0.999 1992.0 1965.3 29.389 2.234 0.988 1.000 0.988 20003 1987.64 1963.91 1.001 10.0564 05/10/11 29.943 66.422 3.3 29.389 2.241 0.988 0.987 12529 0.999 1992.0 1965.4 29.333 2.241 0.988 1.000 0.988 20003 1987.64 1964.00 1.001 10.0565 05/10/11 29.943 66.426 3.3 29.278 2.241 0.988 0.987 12529 0.999 1992.0 1965.6 29.333 2.234 0.988 1.000 0.988 20003 1987.64 1964.00 1.001 10.0551 05/10/11 50.037 39.767 3.3 29.278 2.248 0.988 0.987 12528 0.999 1991.8 1965.6 29.278 2.282 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.21 1.001 10.0572 05/10/11 50.037 39.766 3.3 29.278 2.241 0.988 0.987 12527 0.999 1991.6 1965.4 29.222 2.275 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.30 1.001 10.0583 05/10/11 50.037 39.768 3.3 29.222 2.248 0.988 0.987 12528 0.999 1991.8 1965.7 29.167 2.282 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.40 1.001 10.0574 05/10/11 50.037 39.767 3.3 29.222 2.241 0.988 0.987 12527 0.999 1991.6 1965.5 29.167 2.275 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.40 1.001 10.0585 05/10/11 50.037 39.762 3.3 29.167 2.241 0.988 0.987 12527 0.999 1991.6 1965.5 29.167 2.289 0.988 1.000 0.988 20003 1987.64 1964.30 1.001 10.0581 05/10/11 70.131 28.347 3.3 29.111 2.255 0.988 0.987 12521 0.999 1990.7 1965.0 29.056 2.344 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.61 1.000 10.0622 05/10/11 70.131 28.350 3.3 29.056 2.268 0.988 0.987 12522 0.999 1990.8 1965.2 29.056 2.296 0.988 1.000 0.988 20005 1987.83 1964.70 1.000 10.0613 05/10/11 70.131 28.346 3.3 29.056 2.275 0.988 0.987 12521 0.999 1990.7 1965.1 29.056 2.324 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.61 1.000 10.0614 05/10/11 70.131 28.345 3.3 29.056 2.220 0.988 0.987 12521 0.999 1990.7 1965.0 29.056 2.372 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.62 1.000 10.0625 05/10/11 70.131 28.349 3.3 29.056 2.234 0.988 0.987 12522 0.999 1990.8 1965.2 29.000 2.365 0.988 1.000 0.988 20006 1987.95 1964.92 1.000 10.0621 05/10/11 89.695 22.152 3.3 29.000 2.255 0.988 0.987 12514 0.999 1989.6 1964.3 28.944 2.427 0.988 1.000 0.988 20006 1987.95 1965.02 1.000 10.0672 05/10/11 89.739 22.152 3.3 29.000 2.255 0.988 0.987 12516 0.999 1989.9 1964.6 28.944 2.420 0.988 1.000 0.988 20007 1988.04 1965.11 1.000 10.0663 05/10/11 89.739 22.149 3.3 29.000 2.255 0.988 0.987 12513 0.999 1989.4 1964.2 28.944 2.420 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.81 1.000 10.0674 05/10/11 89.695 22.151 3.3 29.000 2.255 0.988 0.987 12513 0.999 1989.4 1964.2 28.944 2.413 0.988 1.000 0.988 20004 1987.74 1964.81 1.000 10.0675 05/10/11 89.695 22.152 3.3 29.000 2.255 0.988 0.987 12514 0.999 1989.6 1964.3 28.944 2.427 0.988 1.000 0.988 20006 1987.95 1965.02 1.000 10.067


NEL


APPENDIX D

FMC RESULTS FOR

HIGH VISCOSITY TESTS

NEL


FMC 220 cSt TEST RESULTS

Run Date Flow Time Viscosity Tmm Pmm CTLmm CCFmm Nmm MFmm IVmm GSVmm Tm Pm CTLm CCFm N Ivm ISVm MFm KFm

l/s s mm2/s °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre °C Bar Pulses Litre Litre P/Litre

1 04/10/11 9.937 200.789 217 37.056 1.772 0.985 0.982 12555 0.997 1996.1 1960.9 36.444 1.772 0.985 0.985 20002 1987.53 1958.33 1.001 10.0502 04/10/11 9.937 200.788 220 37.000 1.772 0.985 0.982 12556 0.997 1996.2 1961.1 36.167 1.772 0.985 0.985 20002 1987.53 1958.71 1.001 10.0513 04/10/11 9.937 200.790 222 36.611 1.772 0.985 0.983 12555 0.998 1996.1 1961.6 36.056 1.772 0.985 0.986 20002 1987.53 1958.87 1.001 10.0494 04/10/11 9.937 200.828 224 36.333 1.786 0.985 0.983 12556 0.998 1996.2 1962.3 35.889 1.786 0.986 0.986 20002 1987.53 1959.11 1.002 10.0475 04/10/11 9.937 200.822 220 36.389 1.779 0.985 0.983 12555 0.998 1996.1 1962.0 36.167 1.779 0.985 0.985 20002 1987.53 1958.71 1.002 10.0471 04/10/11 29.678 67.070 221 36.500 1.758 0.985 0.982 12564 0.997 1997.5 1962.4 36.111 1.868 0.985 0.986 20004 1987.74 1958.99 1.002 10.0462 04/10/11 29.678 67.078 226 36.722 1.765 0.985 0.982 12563 0.997 1997.4 1962.0 35.722 1.862 0.986 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.45 1.001 10.0513 04/10/11 29.678 67.073 228 36.389 1.758 0.985 0.983 12564 0.997 1997.5 1962.6 35.556 1.862 0.986 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.69 1.001 10.0494 04/10/11 29.678 67.077 227 36.389 1.765 0.985 0.983 12563 0.997 1997.4 1962.4 35.611 1.875 0.986 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.61 1.001 10.0495 04/10/11 29.678 67.076 226 36.333 1.779 0.985 0.983 12563 0.997 1997.4 1962.5 35.722 1.882 0.986 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.45 1.002 10.0481 04/10/11 49.772 39.997 215 36.556 1.751 0.985 0.982 12566 0.997 1997.8 1962.0 36.611 1.986 0.985 0.985 20004 1987.74 1958.29 1.002 10.0452 04/10/11 49.772 39.999 215 36.611 1.751 0.985 0.982 12566 0.997 1997.8 1961.9 36.611 1.986 0.985 0.985 20003 1987.64 1958.20 1.002 10.0453 04/10/11 49.772 39.998 216 36.556 1.744 0.985 0.982 12566 0.997 1997.8 1962.0 36.556 1.979 0.985 0.985 20003 1987.64 1958.28 1.002 10.0454 04/10/11 49.772 39.997 216 36.500 1.751 0.985 0.982 12566 0.997 1997.8 1962.1 36.500 1.972 0.985 0.985 20003 1987.64 1958.36 1.002 10.0455 04/10/11 49.772 39.994 217 36.444 1.744 0.985 0.982 12566 0.997 1997.8 1962.2 36.444 1.979 0.985 0.985 20004 1987.74 1958.53 1.002 10.0451 04/10/11 69.557 28.624 219 36.333 1.765 0.985 0.982 12568 0.997 1998.2 1962.0 36.278 2.144 0.985 0.985 20003 1987.64 1958.69 1.002 10.0472 04/10/11 69.557 28.623 219 36.278 1.765 0.985 0.982 12569 0.997 1998.3 1962.3 36.278 2.151 0.985 0.985 20004 1987.74 1958.80 1.002 10.0463 04/10/11 69.557 28.657 220 36.222 1.758 0.985 0.982 12584 0.997 2000.7 1964.7 36.222 2.137 0.985 0.985 20030 1990.33 1961.43 1.002 10.0474 04/10/11 69.557 28.624 220 36.222 1.772 0.985 0.982 12570 0.997 1998.5 1962.5 36.167 2.151 0.985 0.986 20005 1987.83 1959.06 1.002 10.0465 04/10/11 69.557 28.623 221 36.167 1.765 0.985 0.982 12569 0.997 1998.3 1962.4 36.111 2.144 0.985 0.986 20004 1987.74 1959.04 1.002 10.0461 04/10/11 89.916 22.150 222 36.111 1.758 0.985 0.982 12571 0.997 1998.6 1963.0 36.056 2.330 0.985 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.04 1.002 10.0432 04/10/11 89.916 22.151 222 36.056 1.772 0.985 0.982 12571 0.997 1998.6 1963.1 36.056 2.324 0.985 0.986 20004 1987.74 1959.14 1.002 10.0433 04/10/11 89.916 22.150 222 36.056 1.772 0.985 0.982 12571 0.997 1998.6 1963.1 36.056 2.330 0.985 0.986 20007 1988.04 1959.42 1.002 10.0454 04/10/11 89.916 22.155 222 36.000 1.786 0.985 0.982 12574 0.997 1999.1 1963.6 36.000 2.330 0.985 0.986 20005 1987.83 1959.31 1.002 10.0415 04/10/11 89.916 22.151 222 36.000 1.793 0.985 0.982 12571 0.997 1998.6 1963.2 36.000 2.324 0.985 0.986 20003 1987.64 1959.12 1.002 10.043


NEL


APPENDIX E

FMC NVLAP ACCREDITATION RANGE

NEL


TABLE 8

FMC MULTI – VISCOSITY TEST SYSTEM ACCREDITATION RANGE

Viscosity Range (cSt) Temp

Range Prove

Method(1)

Flow Rate (m3/h) Flow Rate (l/s) Flow Rate (bph) Expanded Uncertainty

(2)

min max min max min max

2 150 21°C

to 43°C

70°F

to 110°F

DMP 30 135 8.3 37.5 190 850 0.065%

135 1,270 37.5 352.8 850 8,000 0.047%

MMPM 60 103 16.7 28.6 380 650 0.091%

103 1,270 28.6 352.8 650 8,000 0.084%

150 250 DMP 30 135 8.3 37.5 190 850 0.055%

135 1,270 37.5 352.8 850 8,000 0.042%

1.) DPM (Direct Proving Method); MMPM (Master Meter Proving Method)

2.) Expanded uncertainty based on a coverage factor of, k = 2, with a level of confidence of approximately 95%.

nel & fmc intercomparison revc - euramet center located in erie, pa usa. the mv test system is a...

Documents