neasc presentation
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Patricia O'Brien, Deputy Director of the NEASC Commission on Institutions of Higher Education for NELINET members on March 20, 2009.TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Preparing your Library for Preparing your Library for NEASC AccreditationNEASC Accreditation
NELINET WorkshopNELINET WorkshopMarch 20, 2009March 20, 2009
Patricia O’Brien, NEASC-CIHEPatricia O’Brien, NEASC-CIHEGai Carpenter, Hampshire CollegeGai Carpenter, Hampshire College
![Page 2: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Topics for today’s workshopTopics for today’s workshop
• Overview of the accreditation process
• Heightened emphases in the Standards for Accreditation
• The Commission’s new data forms
• Preparing for the visit
![Page 3: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
• a status granted to an educational institution or a program that has been found to meet or exceed stated criteria of educational quality
• voluntary
• non-governmental
• self-regulatory
• institutional or specialized
Accreditation isAccreditation is
![Page 4: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Dual purposes of Dual purposes of accreditation:accreditation:
““public” and “private”public” and “private”Assure quality
Foster improvement
Accreditation certifies that an institution:
• Has appropriate purposes
• Has the resources needed to accomplish its purposes
• Demonstrates that it is accomplishing its purposes
• Has the ability continue to accomplish its purposes
![Page 5: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
New England
Middle States
Southern
North Central (Higher Learning Commission)
North Western
Western
Six regional accrediting associations in Six regional accrediting associations in the United Statesthe United States
![Page 6: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
New England Association of New England Association of Schools and CollegesSchools and Colleges
Commission on Institutions of Commission on Institutions of Higher EducationHigher Education
• Accredits 245 colleges and universities in New England and six countries abroad
• 23 commissioners; 9 staff members; hundreds of volunteers
• Compact geography; wide institutional diversity; preponderance of independent institutions
![Page 7: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Standards for AccreditationStandards for Accreditation form the basis form the basis for the evaluationfor the evaluation
• Mission and Purposes
• Planning and Evaluation
• Organization and Governance
• The Academic Program
• Faculty
• Students
• Library & Other Information Resources
• Physical Resources
• Financial Resources
• Public Disclosure
• Integrity
Accreditation = Standards + MissionAccreditation = Standards + Mission
![Page 8: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
• Full self-study for re-accreditation every 10 years
• Interim report every 5 years
• Special reports and/or focused visits as recommended by Commission
• Annual report
• Substantive changes
Accreditation is an “ongoing relationship” that Accreditation is an “ongoing relationship” that involves periodic review of institutions:involves periodic review of institutions:
![Page 9: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
Three part process:Three part process:
• Self-study
• Site Visit
• Commission action
![Page 10: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
Process• 18 – 24 months• Steering
Committee• Widespread
participation• A candid
evaluation of the institution
Product• About 100 pages• One chapter for
each standard• Three-part analytic
framework: description, appraisal, projection
• Data forms
Step 1: Self Study … a process and a productStep 1: Self Study … a process and a product
![Page 11: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Step 2: Site visitStep 2: Site visit
• Sunday afternoon - Wednesday morning
• 6-10 team members, from peer institutions, knowledgeable about the Standards
• Meetings with administrators, faculty members, students, trustees, alumni
• Visits to branch campuses, as appropriate
• Document room
• Exit report
![Page 12: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
Step 3: Commission ActionStep 3: Commission Action
• Semester following site visit
• Commission reviews self-study, Team report and confidential recommendation, institutional response to Team report
• President and Team Chair attend Commission meeting
• Letter to President
![Page 13: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Range of Commission ActionsRange of Commission Actions
• Granting or denial of candidacy status
• Granting or denial of initial accreditation
• Continued accreditation
• Focused report or visit
• Formal notice of concern
• Probation
• Termination of accreditation
![Page 14: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Heightened emphases in the StandardsHeightened emphases in the Standards
• Institutional capacityCan the institution do and do well all that it proposes to do?
• Public disclosure What does Aunt Miriam want to know?
• Institutional effectiveness and assessment
• Educational quality and student success
• Use of evidence
![Page 15: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Mission & Standards
Institutional Effectiveness
Assessment*
*What and how students are learning
Heightened emphasis on assessment and institutional Heightened emphasis on assessment and institutional effectivenesseffectiveness
![Page 16: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Clearer expectations regarding assessment Clearer expectations regarding assessment and institutional effectivenessand institutional effectiveness
• Engagement (“It’s always on our agenda”)o campus communityo external community
• Mission-appropriate approach
• Evidence of what students know and can do
• Broad support from administration, faculty
• Use of assessment results for improvement
• Ongoing commitment, integrated into campus culture
![Page 17: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Educational QualityEducational QualityIn light of the institution’s mission, teams evaluate the quality of:
• Academic programs: curricula, degree objectives
• Student achievement
• Faculty
• Student support services
• Recruiting and admissions procedures
• Library and information resources
• Physical facilities and equipment
• Fiscal and administrative services
• Website, catalogs and other institutional “publications”
![Page 18: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Shifts in approaches to understanding and Shifts in approaches to understanding and assessing qualityassessing quality
Inputs
There are sufficient, qualified faculty
There is appropriate access to adequate library resources
Processes
Students receive good academic advising
Students use library resources
Outcomes
Faculty are demonstrably effective
Students develop skills of information literacy
![Page 19: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
An appropriate level of student successAn appropriate level of student success
The Commission’s Standards expect that:
• Learning goals for each program include knowledge, intellectual and academic skills, and methods of inquiry and, if relevant, creative abilities and values and/or specific career-preparation practices
• Goals for student learning reflect the mission and character of the institution and general expectations of the larger academic community for the level of degree awarded and the field of study
• Goals for retention and graduation reflect institutional purposes
![Page 20: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Measures of Student SuccessMeasures of Student Success
• Retention and graduation
• Other measures related to the institution’s mission, including:
• Pursuing higher degrees
• Pursuing mission-related paths
• Working in fields for which they were not explicitly prepared
• Pursuing other mission-explicit achievements
• Licensure passage rates
• Job placement rates
![Page 21: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Heightened emphasis on evidenceHeightened emphasis on evidence
Evidence answers the question: “How do you know?”
• Enrollment data: admissions, retention, advising
• Publications: website, catalogs, factbooks
• Institutional work products: policy statements, program reviews, strategic plans, committee minutes, task force reports
• Assessment results: normed exams, portfolios, work samples, self-reported gains, external reviews of student work
• Surveys of faculty, students, staff, alumni, employers, community
![Page 22: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Data forms to report on assessment and student success
The E-Series: Making Assessment More Explicit
Select and declare a basic approach to assessment and summarize the findings
The S-Series: Documenting Student Success
Report data on retention rates, graduation rates, and other measures of success appropriate to the
institution’s mission
![Page 23: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Data First Forms
A series of forms (at least one for each Standard) designed to allow you to report key institutional data.
Many forms ask you to report trends over time.
New!
A few examples …
Std 3: Off-campus locations, distance education
Std 4: Enrollment at all levels & locations
Std 5: Faculty salaries & assignments
Std 6: Admissions, student debt
Std 7: Library collections, personnel, instruction, use
Std 10: Public disclosure
![Page 24: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Library Data Form 3 yrs prior
2 yrs prior
Last year
Current year
Next yr goal
Expenditures/FTE student
Collections
Personnel (FTE)
Library Instruction
Reference & Reserves
Circulation
Availability/ attendance
URL of most recent library annual report
URL of Info Literacy reports
![Page 25: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
IT Data Form 3 yrs prior
2 yrs prior
Last year
Current year
Next yr goal
Number (percent) of students w/computers
Course management system
Bandwith
Network
Multimedia classrooms (percent)
IT Personnel (FTE)
Software systems and versions
![Page 26: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Using the data forms in the self-study processUsing the data forms in the self-study process
• Start early so the data can be collected, analyzed, and used by those engaged in the self-study process.
• Appraisal provides an opportunity to reflect on the findings. How well has your institution developed the capacity to collect, analyze and use important institutional data, especially data about student achievement and success?
• Projection provides an opportunity to state commitments about improvements to institutional efforts to collect, analyze and use data – especially data about student achievement and success – for planning and decision making.
![Page 27: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Exhibits for the team roomExhibits for the team room
• Strategic plan for library • Annual reports
• Collection development plans • Budgets for multiple years
• Lists of electronic resources • Consultant reports
• Consortial agreements • Usage statistics
• Information literacy outcomes • Reports & meeting minutes
• List of library liaisons • Surveys & survey results
• Library training schedules • Peer comparisons
• Technology plan IPEDS and ACRL surveys
• Technology policies
• Tech training schedules
• Technology learning outcomes
![Page 28: NEASC Presentation](https://reader033.vdocuments.site/reader033/viewer/2022061217/54b52c994a7959e46f8b4598/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
Your questions, comments, insights …
Patricia M. O'Brien, Deputy DirectorDirect phone line: [email protected]
Commission on Institutions of Higher EducationNew England Association of Schools and Colleges209 Burlington Road, Suite 201Bedford, MA 01730-1433Phone: (781) 271-0022Fax: (781) 271-0950http:cihe.neasc.org
Thank you!Thank you!