7/25/2019 NCAA referees evaluation form

1/2

2015-16 NCAA Division I Mens Basketball

Officials Evaluation Form

(over)

Referee Umpire 1 Umpire 2

Individuals Name

Game Information

vs. Date: Time:Description Rating

Difficulty of game to officiate Average Difficult

Rating Codes

1 = Unsatisfactory 2 = Satisfactory 3 = Exceptional

Note:If you evaluate an official as UNSATISFACTORY in any category, please note any specifics in the comment section.

Evaluation Official

Description Rating

1.

Fitness/mobility.

Official was fit enough to keep up with the pace of the game and get in good position toobserve and officiate plays in his area(s) of responsibility.

1 2 3

2. Communication skills.Communicates as needed; treats coaches, players and table personnel in a professional

manner.

1 2 3

3.

Illegal contact/flow of the game.Official found an acceptable balance between marginal contact, illegal contact and

reducing physical play.

1 2 3

4. Bench decorum/sportsmanship.

Official dealt properly with bench decorum and player sportsmanship issues. 1 2 3

5.

Call accuracy throughout the game.Based on the observations of the evaluator; assess the play calling accuracy of the

official.

1 2 3

6. Game management/mechanics.

Official was aware of and correctly handled all administrative, dead ball, time outs,

substitutions, scoring and timing and rules issues.1 2 3

7. Use of monitor/end of game officiating.

Including authorized use of courtside monitor to end game correctly. 1 2 3 N/A

COMMENTS

Fitness/Mobility

Communication Skills

7/25/2019 NCAA referees evaluation form

2/2

2015-16 NCAA Division I Mens Basketball

Officials Evaluation Form

Illegal Contact/Flow of the Game

Bench Decorum/Sportsmanship

Call Accuracy Throughout the Game

Game Management/Mechanics

Time of Plays for Review

Use of Monitor/End of Game Officiating

Summary