nbf p 17264811
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
1/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
2/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
3/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 3 of 40
What about the prospects for both indicators in 2013? For
inflation, as long as no government policy on the subsidized
fuel price increases, it is expected that inflation will remain
subdued, despite a 15% hikes in electricity tariff and an
average increase of the provincial minimum wage by around
20%. Mandiri economic team expects inflation to be at 5.4%
with core inflation remained under control at a range of 5%. A
positive factor of our economic growth is balanced growth on
both sides, i.e. the demand side (private consumption) and the
production side (investment). As a result, the price stability
can be maintained, reflected by stable core inflation. The
absence of an increase in subsidized fuel price will make
inflation indeed remain low in 2013; however, the cost to be
borne is the ballooning budget of subsidized fuel in the 2013state budget to nearly IDR 200 trillion, or about 12% of the
total state budget of 2013. This surely cannot be maintained if
we want to continue to balance the domestic sector in the
medium term. The government must courageously take a fuel
price adjustment policy, given the distortion of the non-
subsidized fuel price and the subsidized fuel price is so large,
reaching more than 2 times. This large price distortion will not
give incentives to the running of the energy conversion
program and even it will encourage inefficiency in the use of
energy resources as well as further encourage the smuggling
of subsidized fuel. As a result, it is possible that the realizationof subsidized fuel in the 2013 state budget will exceed its
budget as it did in the last 2012 state budget.
And what about the prospect of our trade balance? The low
global demand as economic recovery in developed countries
takes slower than expected will surely give a limited space for
our exports to return to normal. Instead, the rapid investment
growth and robust private consumption along with the
growing middle class society will encourage the growth of
imports along this year. Moreover, in the absence of an
appropriate policy on subsidized fuel, the consumption ofsubsidized fuel is estimated to exceed the Governments
target, which will further encourage increased imports. As a
result, the deficit in our trade balance is expected to continue
to occur this year or in other words the external sector
imbalances will continue this year.
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
4/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
5/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 5 of 40
to depreciate, lowers Loan to Value ratio and raises Down
Payment for property and automotive sectors and raises
interest rates of Bank Indonesia Deposit Facility (FASBI) by 25
basis points in August 2012. These policies aim to restrain
import growth acceleration and less productive investments.
The combination of these policies is expected to be reapplied
by BI in 2013 when the deficit in the trade balance
deteriorates, thus expanding our current account deficit.
From the government side, some policies that have been and
will be conducted by the government include encouraging
downstream industries so as to reduce dependence on
imported raw materials and capital goods, application of
export duties and regulations on trade and provision of taxincentives for some strategic industries in tax holiday for 5-10
years to improve the competitiveness of national industries. In
the near future the Government will also implement a policy
on tightening importation of consumer goods, such as mobile
phones, laptops and tablet computers in order to encourage
domestic production and reduce imports of consumer goods.
These policies are aimed to encourage companies producing
these products to make Indonesia its production base of their
business and not just using Indonesia as a market for their
products. Thus, the impact on Indonesia will be more positive,
because it can create new jobs for Indonesian workers.
If the above steps and policies are executed consistently and
continuously by the Government and BI, it is expected that
our external imbalance problems can be overcome in the
medium term. Of course, the classic problem in our economy
over the years ie. the availability of adequate infrastructure,
must also be our common concern and need to be improved.
Thus, Indonesias sustainable economic growth can be realized
through a balance in domestic and external sectors.
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
6/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 6 of 40
Bond Market Outlook 2013
Handi Yunianto ([email protected])
Low yield, higher volatility
Rupiah bond market again delivered strong gains in the last
four years although the return continued to decline, as the
yields have extremely been low. Foreign fund inflows and
warehousing of government bonds by Bank Indonesia
remained as the key pillars of support for the bond market in
2012.
For 2013, we expect yields to remain low but with increased
volatility and minimal scope for bond prices to appreciate
further. Some catalysts that will support low yields in 2013:
Low inflation and flush liquidity as a result of the ultra-loose
monetary policies resorted by most central banks , Bank
Indonesia still is projected to be the big potential buyer of
government bonds to speed up its plan to use the bonds as
monetary instruments to replace SBI. We expect the 10-year
government bonds will trade between 5.2-5.5% in 2013, thus
we believe the return of investing in the government bonds
this year will be lower than 2012. Volatility might increase, as
foreigners still dominate the government bond ownership,
while the rupiah is still under pressure, trading above to IDR
9.800 against the US dollar.
Three risks that must be considered are: (1) higher supply of
government bonds due to potentially increasing budget deficit
(2) higher inflation if government increases subsidized fuel
prices and (3) expectation of rupiah further weakening that
can trigger foreign fund outflows.
Bond outlook for 2013: yields to remain low but volatility
might increase
As the yields has extremely low level compared to history and
global economic outlook will likely record a mild recovery,
assessing bond market outlook 2013 will be more challenging
than usual. However, we still believe that low yields might be
sustained but higher volatility in 2013, as foreigners remain
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
7/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 7 of 40
dominant in government bonds and rupiah currency trading
closed to IDR 9.800 levels against US dollar.
Some catalysts to support low yields in 2013
There are at least four factors to support low yield in our view:
1. Interest rate will remain low. Austerity measure
undertaken by the Euro area, lackluster economy in the US
and economic slowdown in China hampered global
economic recovery. The IMF revised down its world
economic growth forecast to 3.3% and 3.6% in 2012 and
2013 from 3.5% and 3.9% respectively in October forecast.
With fiscal problem continue, we believe ultra low interest
rate will be kept longer that will make demand for higher-yielding assets should remain firm. According to
Bloomberg market consensus survey, Fed Fund Rate and
ECB rate projected at lower rate i.e. 0.25% until mid 2015
and 0.75% until mid of 2014. On domestic news, we
expect inflation rate will remain within the range of BIs
target although at upper bound of the 3.5-5.5% due to
increasing electricity tariff and assuming no increase in
fuel price subsidies. Thus, BI rate will likely be kept stable
at 5.75%.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Dec-07
Dec-08
Dec-09
Dec-10
Dec-11
Dec-12
Dec-13
Rate(%)
FFR
ECB rate
Figure 1. The IMF revise down its world economic growth forecast to 3.6% in 2013 from 3.9% in
October forecast (left figure). Low interest rate will keep longer that will make demand on higher-
yielding asset should remain firm (right figure). (Source: IMF, Bloomberg)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
8/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 8 of 40
2. Indonesias economic fundamental has proven its
resiliency. Solid domestic demand and significant growing
in investment make Indonesian source of growth morebalance and it make more resilient to global economic
slowdown. Our economist expects economy is likely to
remain robust in 2013 at 6.3%. The impact of the global
economic slowdown, we believe, is to be limited as it
could be compensated by the domestic demand supported
by healthy consumer purchasing power, lower cost of
fund, and faster infrastructure development. The increase
in minimum wage will also be one of the catalysts, as it
transfers income from capital owners to
households/labors. Investment spending will also be
projected to continue to be strong on the back of foreigndirect investment and infrastructure development.
3. Continue stronger fiscal health. When the average debts
to GDP ratio for countries in the developed world is on
average at 114% and rising, meanwhile in Indonesia the
ratio in only 38% as of Sep12 and will likely continue to
fall. This will support low yields relative to the developed
world. Meanwhile, the budget deficit level is still
maintained at a safe level of only IDR 153.3tn (1.7% of
GDP), and the ratio of government debt is also targeted to
continue to decline to a level of 23% of the GDP 2013.Solid economic fundamentals will be positive for bonds
market as the sovereign rating is projected to be
maintained at investment-grade level with stable outlook.
1.9
2.7 2.93.1
0.6
2.1
2.6 2.4
(2.0)
(1.0)
-
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2006 2011 9M12 3Q12
GDP growth contribution
(ppt)
Net exports
Gross Fixed Capital Formation
Government spending
Private consumption
BBB-
BB+
BB-
B+
B-
B
B+
BB-
BB
BB+
BBB-
Jun-97
Dec-97
Jan-98
Feb-98
Mar-98
Aug-02
Nov-03
Jan-05
Feb-08
Jan-10
Dec-11
Fitch Rating For Indonesia's Sovereign Debt
S&P : BB+ (Positive)
Moody's : Ba1 (Stable)
Fitch : BBB- (Stable)
Figure 2. Indonesia GDP still projected 6.3% although global economic tend to weaken; private
consumption and investment are engine of growth (left figure). Stronger fiscal health will be
maintained Indonesia investment grade level in 2013 (right figure). (Source: CEIC, DMO)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
9/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 9 of 40
4. Supply of government bonds to be higher in 2013, but
still manageable, as government will issue new
instruments. Higher issuance of government bonds is
inevitable as the government uses it as the main source of
funding for its budget deficit. The budget deficit is
expected to be 1.7% of GDP or IDR 153.3tn in 2013.
Although it is expected to be lower than in 2012 (IDR
190tn but the realization might be lower to deficit IDR
156tn), the net bond issuance is expected to rise to around
IDR 178tn as it plans to reduce offshore loans by IDR
19.4tn. As maturing bonds in 2013 will reach IDR 80tn, the
government is projected to issue IDR 281.3tn in gross
amount, including bond buyback. Although higher
issuances, total outstanding government bonds to GDPwas still projected low i.e. 16% as of 2013 vs. 16.2% in
2012. In addition, government also plans to issue new
instrument in 2013 i.e. USD issuances for domestic and
opening the green shoe option to fulfill the target.
Hopefully, this plan will generate deeper financial system
and attract further USD liquidity parked offshore.
If we compare with the 2012 strategy, there are no significant
policy changes in government securities financing strategy.
1. Optimizing domestic market by issuing rupiah bonds.
According to debt management strategy, government will
continue to issue bonds more on domestic rather than
global issuances. In 2012, the government reduced global
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
DebttoGDP%
1.1
0.5
0.9
1.3
0.1
1.6
0.7
1.3
2.2
1.7
-50
0
50
100
150
200
250
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Rp tn
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
% of GDP
Other/Non Debt-Nett
External Loan - Nett
Goc't Securites - Nett
Budget Deficit, % of GDP
Government
securities financing
strategy in 2013: not
change significantly
Figure 3. Government uses bond issuances as the main source of funding for budget deficit (left
figure). However debt to GDP ratio continues to decline (right figure). (Source: DMO)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
10/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 10 of 40
bond issuances slightly to 21% of total gross issuance
although slightly higher than initial target of 18% and
average 23% in the last five years. The government again
plan the maximum global bond issuance is 14% of the total
issuances for 2013. It will be including plan to sell
USD500mn-1bn for domestic investors in 2H 2013. Thus, it
will need to issue IDR 241.9tn in the local currency
including private placement and retail bonds-in the form
of conventional and syariah papers- in 2013. Assuming
that private placement and retail bond issuance will be the
same as in 2012 of IDR 26.3tn and IDR 15.3tn respectively,
the government still needs to issue IDR 16.7tn on average
per month or slightly higher than IDR 14.3tn in 2012.
2. Maintain front loading policy. We still believe that the
government will do front-loading strategy in order to
mitigate the impacts of global uncertainties. This strategy
will also be in line with government maturity profile, which
projected more than IDR 48tn governments bonds will
mature in 1H while only IDR 32tn in 2H 2013. Government
announced new benchmark series for 2013 i.e. 5-yr
FR0066, 10-yr FR0063, 15-yr FR0064 and 20-yr FR0065.
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
2009 2010 2011 2012
1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q
87.0102.4
137.2
174.1
212.9241.9
39.3
46.7
25.2
30.4
55.9
39.4
-
50
100
150
200
250
300
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-
Target
Rpt
rillion
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
Do me st ic I ssu an ce s G lobal I ssuan ce s
% Global to t otal issuances (RHS)
Figure 4. Continue optimizing domestic market by issuing rupiah bonds (left figure). We expect
front loading policy will continue (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
11/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 11 of 40
Bonds
MaturityDate Coupon(%) Duration(yrs) Price as of31-Dec-12 YTM (%)
FR066 May-18 5.25 4.7 102.74 4.67
FR063 May-23 5.625 8.0 104.25 5.09
FR064 May-28 6.125 10.2 103.85 5.74
FR065 May-33 6.625 11.6 106.18 6.09
3. Lengthening liability duration. With flattened yield curve
and government aim to mitigate refinancing risk, we
believe that government will continue to lengthening their
duration liability as they projected to issue more long-term
debts, with those over 10 years targeted to be 57% of the
total issuances, while the 1-year notes only 14%.
2011 2012 2013F
Budget deficit 88 190 153
% of GDP 1.3 2.2 1.7Net Issuances 121 160 178
Redemption and
Buyback84 109 104
Gross issuances 205 269 282
Domestic bonds 174 85% 213 79% 243 86%
Conventional FR/VR 99 48% 123 45%
T-bills/ZC bonds 41 20% 31 11%
Retail bonds (ORI &
Sukuk)18 9% 26 9%
Domestic sukuk 5 2% 17 6%
Private placement 11 5% 15 5%
Global bonds 30 15% 56 21% 39 14%
Yankee bonds 21 10% 39 14%
Global sukuks 9 4% 10 3%Samurai bonds 0% 7 2%
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Rp trillion
Fixed
Fixed Retail
Non tradale
Sukuk Ijarah
Sukuk Ijarah Retail
Zero Coupon Bill
Zero Coupon Bond
Figure 5. New government bond benchmark series for 2013 (left figure). More than IDR 48 tn bonds
will mature in 1H while only IDR 32 tn in 2H 2013 (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)
Figure 6. Lengthening government bonds liability duration might continue (left figure). Gross
issuances by instrument: Sukuk issuance projected to increase (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri
estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
12/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 12 of 40
After foreigners and bank Indonesia became the biggest net
buyer in 2012, we believe that it will be the same for 2013 due
to the low yields offer currently in market. Foreigners booked
the highest net buy of the government bonds followed by
Bank Indonesia, who together snapped up almost 69% of net
issuances in 2012. Pension funds and mutual funds we believe
will continue to switch their portfolios from government
bonds to time deposit, corporate bonds and the stock market
to enhance their returns. Demand from mutual funds might
also continue to lessen since a 5% tax will be slapped on
mutual fund industry over this year and it will give the same
tax treatment of 15% in 2014. In 2012, mutual funds cut their
portfolio in government bonds a total IDR 3.9tn. While
pension funds government bonds add quite significant by IDR
22.1n, but we believe the data is misleading as theres IDR
22.8tn of transfer bonds from insurances happened in 4-Dec
and 26-Dec which should be the same entity. Excluding
transfer transaction, pension fund portfolio in government
bonds fell by IDR 0.7tn in 2012 after reporting net sell of IDR
3.1tn in the last two consecutive years.
Bank Indonesia is still buying government bonds to speed up
its plan to use the bonds as monetary-policy instruments to
manage liquidity in the financial market to replace SBI. Bank
Indonesias active purchases of government bonds will notboost liquidity as the central bank absorbs back some of the
liquidity through reverse-repo deals. In 2012, BI bought
government bonds totaling IDR 18.7tn although lower than
2011 which reported IDR 42.8tn, but reverse repo with banks
totaling IDR 81.4tn or almost 18% of their Open Market
Operation (OMO) (vs. only 12% in 2011). Under the base
scenario, BI would need to buy an additional IDR 78tn
assuming excess liquidity growth is in line with nominal GDP
(11%), SBI outstanding constant (IDR 78.9tn) and increasing
tradable securities to 47% of OMO. We calculate that
weighted average yield to maturity of government bondsowned by Bank Indonesia is 6.3%. We believe this is the
support level for rupiah bond market in 2013, currently the
average yield to maturity of government bond is 5.5%.
Demand outlook: We
believe there will be no
significant changes in
bond investors in 2013
Bank Indonesia is still
projected to be the big
potential buyer of
government bonds to
speed up its plan to use
the bonds as monetary
instrument to replace
SBI.
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
13/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 13 of 40
*) based on survey by MoF
**) Theres IDR 22.8tn of transfer bonds from insurances happened in 4-Dec and 26-Dec which should be the same entity.
Excluding transfer transaction, pension fund portfolio in government bonds fell by IDR 0.7tn in 2012 after reporting net
sell of IDR 3.1tn in the last two consecutive years.
According to the latest survey by the Ministry of Finance, the
net potential demand for government bonds for 2013 is
projected to reach almost IDR 80tn. This is still lower than its
2010 NetBuy
2010 %ownership
2011 NetBuy
2011 %ownership
2012 NetBuy
2012 %ownership
2013 NetBuy*)
Foreigners 87.3 30 27.6 31 47.7 33 n.a
Banks (39.4) 33 (5.1) 29 10.9 27 32.7
Bank Indonesia (2.4) 4 42.8 9 18.7 10 n.a
Onshore-non banks 13.8 33 17.1 31 19.4 30 47.2
Insurances **) 6.7 12 13.8 13 (9.5) 10 2.4
Mutual Funds 5.9 8 (3.9) 7 (3.9) 5 6.0
Pension Funds **) (0.8) 6 (2.4) 5 22.1 7 12.4
Others 2.0 7 9.6 7 10.7 8 26.4
Total 59.3 100 82.4 100 96.7 100
0
50
100
150
200
250
Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12 May-12 Aug-12 Nov-12
R
pT
rillion
Government Bonds owned by Bank Indonesia
SBI
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12
% of OMO
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000BI's
ownership in
government
bonds (Rp bn)
Figure 8. Bank Indonesia continues buying government bonds to speed up its plan to use the bonds
as monetary policy instruments (left figure). Reserve repo continues to increase in OMO of Bank
Indonesia (right figure). (Source: Bloomberg, Mandiri estimate)
Figure 7. New government bond benchmark series for 2013 (left figure). More than IDR 48 tn bonds
will mature in 1H while only IDR 32 tn in 2H 2013 (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
14/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 14 of 40
issuance target for this year, but the survey does not include
retail and global bond issuances. The highest demand might
be coming from banks i.e. IDR 53.4tn followed by others and
pension funds, which are projected to be IDR 25.1tn and IDR
12.4tn respectively.
We made a portfolio simulation to compare their performance
due to some yield curve scenario in 2013. There are three
scenarios (1) Yield curve stable at current level. As yield curve
in 2012 has normal shape, thus investors can sell the bonds at
lower yields by YE13 we called it riding the yield curve. (2)
Using implied forward yield curve (3) Using fair yield
regression model assuming that BI rate stable at 5.75%,
inflation rises slightly to 5.5%, the rupiah appreciate slightly to9,600 and the Fed Fund Rate stable at 0.25% thus the two-and
ten-year bond yields are predicted to be 4.7% and 5.4% in
2013. From three scenarios, we found that the barbell
strategy will give the optimum performance this year but the
return is much lower than 2012. We also suggest overweight
on corporate bonds with good ratings, as their risk premiums
are still higher than the average long-term spread.
Yield movement
outlook and their
potential returns
in 2013
4.5
4.8
5.2
5.9
6.3
5.6
6.1
6.4
5.1
4.8
5.0
4.7
5.4
6.1
6.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
0 5 10 15 20
Time to maturity (yrs)
YTM (%)
Scenario 1: Yield curve stable
Scenario 2: Implied Forward
Scenario 3: Fair yield model
4.6 4.6 4.64.5
1.9
2.83.0
3.3
3.6
3.2
2.6
3.8
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
FR0063 FR0064 FR0065 FR0066
Expected Total
Return 2013 (%)
Scenario1: Yield curve stable
Scenario 2: Implied forwardl
Scenario 3: Fair yield model
Meanwhile, latest
survey by MoF
showed that Banks
and Others investors
are the highest net
potential demand for
government bonds in
2013.
Figure 9. Yield curve scenario in 2013 (left figure). Projected lower bonds return expectations in
2013 (right figure). (Source: Mandiri estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
15/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 15 of 40
There are still some critical risk factors in our opinion that
might drag down return in bond market in 2013:
1. Weakening rupiah following deteriorating current
account data
The rupiahs movement against the US dollar will be the
most critical factor to be watched as foreign investors
holding in the governments rupiah bonds is still high.
Historically, the rupiahs depreciation usually triggered
fund outflows as foreigners tried to reduce exchange rate
risks. Widen current account deficit underpinned by
weaker exports, stronger import growth, and higher
income repatriation from FDI might increase pressure on
the rupiah currency. Based on our sensitivity calculations,if the USD rises above IDR9,828/USD, it can trigger foreign
outflows since the average entry point of foreigners into
Indonesia's government bond market since 2009 is
IDR9,130/USD and average yield at 7.8%.
2. Increasing inflation due to risk increase in subsidized fuelprices
Rising inflation could be triggered by increase in subsidized
fuel prices in 2013. As the government delayed the fuel
price subsidy increase this year, fuel subsidies are rising
significantly. In 2012, energy subsidies are projected reach
3.6% of GDP (IDR306tn) or higher than in 2008 and 2005 of
2.8% and 3.5% of GDP respectively when subsidized fuel
However, there are
two main risks
investing in thegovernment bonds
2013: weaker rupiah
against USD and
rising inflation.
(40,000)
(30,000)
(20,000)
(10,000)
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12
Rp
bn
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Aerage
YTM%
Foregn inflow/(outflow) - LHS
YTM - RHS
(40,000)
(30,000)
(20,000)
(10,000)
-
10,000
20,000
30,000
Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12
Rpbn
8,000
8,500
9,000
9,500
10,000
10,500
IDR
/USD
Foregn inflow/(outflow) - LHS
IDR - RHS
Figure 10. Average entry level of foreign into Indonesias government bond market since 2009 was
average yield at 7.7% (left figure). Average entry level of foreign into Indonesias government bond
market since 2009 was IDR 9,130/USD (left figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
16/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
17/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 17 of 40
As a conclusion, for 2013 we expect low yields might be
sustained but with higher volatility and minimal bond price
appreciation. Some positive factors: (1) low inflation and flush
liquidity as a result of the ultra-loose monetary policies
resorted by most central banks and (2) Bank Indonesia is still
projected to be the big potential buyer of government bonds
to speed up its plan to use the bonds as monetary instrument
to replace SBI. We look for the 10-year government bonds will
trade at range of between 5.2-5.5% in 2013, thus we believe
the return of investing in government bonds will be lower
than 2012. To enhance the return, we maintain suggestion to
overweight on corporate bonds with good ratings, as their risk
premiums are still higher than the average long-term spread.
Risk factors that must be considered are: (1) higher supply ofgovernment bonds (2) higher inflation if government increases
subsidized fuel prices (3) weakening in the rupiah following
deteriorating BoP data that can trigger foreign fund outflows.
IDR corporate bond market outlook 2013: Continue to
improve
Corporate rupiah bond market continues to improve as new
issuances reported IDR 69.3tn the highest in history. We
believe there are four factors behind significantly corporate
bonds issuances Rupiah in 2012:
1. Lower risk-free yields that make cost of borrowing in
bond market continue to decline.
2. Refinancing motives are higher as there are IDR 24tn
bonds matured in 2012.
3. Robust domestic economic growth will trigger
companies to expanse their business. Thus, total
issuances continue to be higher than maturing bonds
(IDR 58.8tn vs. IDR 24.2tn in 2012). The only amount of
issuance which is less than the matured one happened
in 2008, as yield rose significantly amid soaringsubprime mortgage crisis in US.
4. New regulation by Bapepam-LK on Continual Public
Offering (Penerbitan Umum Berkelanjutan) that allows
companies easier to issue bonds as it only requires a
one effective statement for a period of two years. Note
that there is 25 companies used this new regulation
totaling IDR 44.4tn issuances in 2012.
Total issuances in
2012 recorded the
highest in history; we
still expect issuances
will remain high in2013
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
18/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 18 of 40
We believe that all those factors will still be positive for 2013.
As we expect that risk-free yields would continue to remain
low this year, we believe appetite for corporate bond issuance
is also still high. In 2013 and 2014 there is also IDR 22.8tn and
IDR 31.9tn which will mature, also trigger refinancing motives
to remain high in 2013. We expect total issuances of
corporate bonds will range IDR 50-60tn this year. Multi
finances and banking still the most dominant sector that
issued bonds. However, the trend is declining as some new
sectors starting coming to the market such as infrastructure,
property and mining.
In the secondary market, trading activity is also rising
following higher demand as government bond yields
continued to decline. Trading volume reported IDR 0.6tn on
average per day or almost double compared to average last
two years. Liquidity risk in corporate bonds also lower asforeign ownership in corporate bonds also continued to
increase to 5.7% from 4.8% from total outstanding in 2011.
We still maintain our prediction that corporate bonds will
continue to improve in 2013 both in the primary and
secondary markets.
Financial
Company
40%
Banking
26%
Consumer
Goods
9%
Telecommunica
tion
7%
Automotive
Related Industry
5%
Mining Oil &
Natural Gas
3%
Property &
Construction
6%
Transportasi
0%
Infrastructure
2%
Advertising,
Printing & Media
2%
30.0
12.9
29.7
38.944.8
69.3
13.3
24.4
13.9 12.4 11.7
27.5
84.6
73.0
88.8
115.3
148.4
190.2
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
New Issuances
Matured
Outstandings
Figure 13. Total outstanding amount of Rupiah corporate bonds continue to increase (left figure).
However, financial companies still dominate issuance (66.5% of total issuance in 2012) (left figure).
(Source: IDX)
Liquidity risk is lower
as trading volume
continue to improve
due to high average
size issuances per
series and increasing
foreign ownership
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
19/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 19 of 40
Since global crisis in 2008, most of local investor institution
has limited their investing in corporate bonds only at very high
rating at least A rated. As almost 95% of corporate bonds
ownership is dominated by local investors, thus new issuances
-
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012
x
-
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
Rpb
n
Average trading volume per day
Freq trading
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
6.0%
Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12
%o
ftotalouts
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
9,000
10,000
Rpbn
Portfolio amount (RHS)
Share of total outs (LHS)
Bonds NameMaturity
DateRating
Duration
(yrs)
Coupon
(%)
Outstanding
(RP bn)
Avg trading
volume per
day (Rp bn)
Last
transaction
Date
Price YTM (%)
PNBN04SB Subordinasi Bank Panin I I I Tahun
2010
17-Nov idAA-
/A+(idn)
3.8 10.5 2,460 24 27-Dec-12 100 10.5
MEGA01 Subordinasi Bank Mega Tahun 2007 13-Jan BBB(idn) 0.1 11.5 1,000 21 27-Dec-12 100.03 10.7
ASDF01CCN1 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap I
Tahun 2012 Seri C
17-Feb idAA+ 3.5 8.6 2,250 6 3-Jan-13 100.3 8.51
ADMF01CCN3 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap III
Tahun 2012 Seri C
17-Sep idAA+ 3.9 8.75 673 9 14-Dec-12 100.05 8.74
ADMF01BCN3 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap III
Tahun 2012 Seri B
15-Sep idAA+ 2.5 7.75 578 19 28-Dec-12 100 7.75
ASDF01ACN2 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap II
Tahun 2012 Seri A
13-Oct idAA+ 0.8 6.65 589 16 3-Jan-13 100.08 6.54
APLN02 Agung Podomoro Sei II Tahun 2012 17-Aug idA 3.8 9.38 1,200 10 2-Jan-13 100 9.37
ISAT08B Indosat Seri VIII Tahun 2012 Seri B 22-Jun idAA+ 6.6 8.88 1,500 7 28-Dec-12 105.64 8.02
BNGA02SB Subordinasi I I Bank CIMB Niaga
Tahun 2010
20-Dec AA(idn) 5.5 10.85 1,600 9 26-Dec-12 107.9 9.43
SANF02C SAN Finance II Tahun 2012 Seri C 15-Jan AA(idn); 1.9 8.4 807 11 26-Dec-12 101.89 7.4
BMTR01B Global Mediacom I Tahun 2012 Seri
B
17-Jul idA+ 3.6 10.5 1,000 18 2-Jan-13 100 10.5
BBTN01CN1 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Bank BTN
Tahap I Tahun 2012
22-Jun idA A/AA (id
n)
6.7 7.9 2,000 9 21-Dec-12 101.15 7.73
ISAT08A Indosat VIII Tahun 2012 Seri A 19-Jun idAA+ 5 8.63 1,200 8 14-Dec-12 103.42 7.95
MEDC03 Medco Energi Internasional I II Tahun
2012
17-Jun idAA- 3.8 8.75 1,500 6 20-Dec-12 100 8.75
BNII01SB Subordinasi I Bank BII Tahun 2011 18-May idAA 4.2 10.75 1,500 8 21-Dec-12 105.5 9.44
Credit risk
measurement: Still
positive as mostly
corporate revenue was
driven by domestic
demand
Figure 14. Trading in secondary market also improved following rising demand as government
bond yields continue to fall (left figure). Foreign participant continue to rise (left figure). (Source:
IDX)
Figure 15. Top 15 the most active bonds traded in secondary market . (Source: IDX)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
20/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 20 of 40
coming to the market are also much selected and mostly
higher than A rated. Weighted average credit score bonds
rating issuances in 2012 is 3.4 (AA rated) slightly lower than
2011 i.e. 3.3. According to Pefindo rating agency calculation,
probability of default 1 year ahead of higher A rated was only
4.4%. This condition also affects lowering defaulted bonds in
2012.
We try to calculate a simple Altman Z-Score model for all non-
financial companies that listed in bourse. We found that
shipping marine transportation and wood-based sector still
gives the lowest score. Meanwhile the highest scores
reported by consumer and retail sectors. Based on the latest
transaction data, some corporate bonds names haveattractive valuation in our view are JMPD14JM10, SSMM01B
and TBLA02.
A ve ra ge S tD ev
AAA 101 183 224 108 337 244 223 273 270 169 62
AA+ 117 207 242 122 356 267 262 301 302 190 66
AA 135 234 261 138 376 292 308 333 337 214 71
AA- 157 264 282 156 397 319 362 367 376 241 77
A+ 182 298 304 177 419 350 425 406 420 272 84A 210 337 328 200 442 383 499 448 469 307 93
A- 244 381 354 226 467 419 586 495 524 346 105
BBB+ 282 431 381 256 492 458 689 547 585 390 119
BBB 327 487 411 289 520 501 809 604 654 441 136
BBB- 378 550 444 327 549 549 951 667 730 499 158
1 1- De c 1 2- De c2004-Oct2012
7-Dec 8-Dec 9-Dec 10-DecRating 4-Dec 5-Dec 6-Dec
Figure 16. One year rating transition rate (1996-2010). (Source: Pefindo)
Figure 17. Theoretical risk premium by rating: still higher the average long-term spread . (Source:
IDX)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
21/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 21 of 40
Sectors
Average
Rating
The
highest
Rating
The lowest
Rating
Number
bond
series
Total
outstanding
bondsBanking 4.2 1.0 9.0 96 70,588
Financial Company 3.4 2.0 9.0 113 48,155
Infrastructure 2.9 2.0 6.0 29 21,618
Telecommunication 2.1 1.0 4.0 18 13,350
Mining Oil & Natural Gas 5.3 3.0 9.0 12 8,427
Consumer Goods 3.9 2.0 6.0 12 8,340
Property & Construction 5.9 4.0 8.0 17 6,230
Automotive Related Industry 4.8 3.0 6.0 13 3,494
KIK EBA 1.0 1.0 1.0 5 2,206
Wood Based & Agro Industries 14.5 6.0 18.0 6 1,967
Advertising, Printing & Media 5.0 5.0 5.0 2 1,250
Securities Company 7.2 6.0 9.0 5 850
Shipping & Marine Transport Services 12.5 7.0 18.0 4 842
Fertilizer 3.0 3.0 3.0 2 791
Chemicals 5.7 5.0 7.0 3 773
Retail 4.7 4.0 5.0 6 757
Poultry 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 300
Transportasi 8.0 8.0 8.0 1 150
Computer and Peripheral 8.0 8.0 8.0 1 900%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
(2) (1) - 1 2 3 4 5 6
Altman Z-Score
YieldS
preada
verRiskfree
JMPD14JM10SSMM01B
TBLA02
Figure 18. Average rating per sector (left figure). Altman z-score and yield spread comparison (rightfigure). (Source: IDX)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
22/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 22 of 40
Sector
Company Rating
Altman Z Score
TypeFY11
3Q12
/2Q12 *
Chemicals Lautan Luas id A- 1.91 1.79 Manufacture (Public)
Automotive Services Serasi Autoraya id A+ 1.20 1.36 Non-Manufacture
Consumer Goods Bentoel AAA (idn) 3.14 2.75 Manufacture (Public)
Fast Food Indonesia id AA 7.42 8.42 Manufacture (Public)
Indofood Sukses Makmur id AA+ 3.30 3.08 Manufacture (Public)
Mayora Indah id AA- 4.20 4.87 Manufacture (Public)
Fertilizer Pupuk Kaltim id AA 2.77 2.81 Manufacture
Industrial Selamat Sempurna id AA- 3.61 2.97 Manufacture
Infrastructure Jasa Marga id AA 2.17 3.72 Non-Manufacture
Perusahaan Listrik Negara id AA+ 1.03 1.14 Non-Manufacture
Media Global Mediacom id A+ 4.07 4.58 Non-Manufacture
Mining Oil & Natural Gas Aneka Gas Industri BBB (idn) 1.24 1.23 Non-Manufacture
Aneka Tambang id AA 4.78 4.01 Non-Manufacture
Apexindo Pratama Duta id A 1.22 1.24 Non-Manufacture
Medco Energi International id AA- 1.59 1.52 Non-Manufacture
Trading and Logistics AKR Corporindo id AA- 3.10 3.04 Non-Manufacture
Pastoral & Agricultural Malindo Feedmill id AAA 4.41 4.71 Manufacture (Public)
Japfa id A 3.98 3.62 Manufacture (Public)
Plantation BW Plantation id A 2.18 2.08 Manufacture (Public)
Salim Ivomas Pratama id AA 2.51 2.59 Manufacture (Public)
Sinar Mas Agro Resources and Tech id AA- 4.97 4.63 Manufacture (Public)
Tunas Baru Lampung id A 2.40 2.19 Manufacture (Public)
Property & Construction Adhi Karya id A 1.70 1.65 Non-Manufacture
Agung Podomoro Land id A 3.41 3.03 Non-Manufacture
Bakrieland Development id B 0.75 0.46 Non-Manufacture
Bumi Serpong Damai id A+ 3.47 3.53 Non-Manufacture
Summarecon Agung id A 2.33 2.32 Non-Manufacture
Surya Semesta Internusa id A 1.10 1.10 Non-ManufactureWaskita Karya id A- 1.76 1.28 Non-Manufacture
Telecommunication Indosat id AA+ 1.46 1.27 Non-Manufacture
Telkom id AAA 3.92 4.15 Non-Manufacture
Retail Matahari Putra Prima id A+ 1.95 2.05 Non-Manufacture
Mitra Adiperkasa id AA- 4.10 4.38 Non-Manufacture
Shipping & Marine
Transport Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line
id D
(disc) (1.13) (2.64) Non-Manufacture
Bahtera Adimina Samudra n.a. (28.05) (173.14) Non-Manufacture
Berlian Laju Tanker id D 0.63 0.63 Non-Manufacture
Transportation Panorama Transportasi id BBB+ 1.00 1.00 Non-Manufacture
Wood Based & Agro
Industries Ciliandra Perkasa id A+ 2.24 2.35 Manufacture
Indah Kiat id D 0.53 0.48 Manufacture
Lontar Papyrus id D 0.13 0.09 Manufacture
Pindo Deli id D 0.63 0.65 ManufactureTitan Petrokimia Nusantara A+ (idn) 1.36 1.43 Manufacture (Public)
Tjiwi Kimia id BBB 1.13 1.12 Manufacture (Public)
Figure 19. Altman z-score calculation. (Source: Bloomberg, Mandiri Estimate)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
23/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 23 of 40
Strengthening Domestic Connectivity Towards ASEAN Economic
Community (AEC) 2015Mamay Sukaesih ([email protected])
ASEAN as a regional organization has become an important
factor in the economic order, politics and global security.
According to IMF data, the GDP share of ASEAN-5 to the global
GDP was 3.65% with a GDP value of USD 1,827.6 billion in
2011. In terms of the economy, ASEAN countries have a
diverse economic profile and main exports. Cooperation
between ASEAN countries has a strategic role and is able to
influence a variety of important activities in the order ofinternational relations to be able to spearhead international
cooperation through trade and capital flows or investments.
ASEAN connectivity will assist in the facilitation of a single
market and a more integrated production network and
encourage trade and investments between the countries in
the region. A simple description of ASEAN connectivity is as
shown in Figure 20.
Figure 20. Interaction Between ASEAN Connectivity and ASEAN Economic Community. (Source:
Masterplan on ASEAN Connectivity)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
24/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 24 of 40
Development of Intra-ASEAN Trade
Target of realized ASEAN connectivity is only 2 years away.
But, the homework related transportation sector for
Government and Private has still many. ASEAN connectivity
can be an opportunity and challenge for Indonesia. Indonesias
readiness towards ASEAN connectivity is essential that the
ASEAN connectivity can give positive impacts on the economy.
Proportion of intra-ASEAN trade to total ASEAN trade has
increased for 10 years, from 21,8% in 2001 to 25% in 2011.
Intra-ASEAN export growth was 256%, from USD 86.3 billion in
2001 to USD 309 billion in 2011. Meanwhile, intra-ASEAN
import growth was 282%, from USD 71.3 billion in 2001 to
USD 272.5 billion in 2011.
Furthermore from 7 ASEAN countries, Singapore, Thailand and
Malaysia have trade surplus in intra-ASEAN trade for 5 years.
Singapore has the largest trade surplus in 2011. While
Indonesia, Cambodia, Philippines and Vietnam have trade
deficit. In intra-ASEAN trade, share of Singapores export to
ASEAN countries and share of Singapores import from ASEAN
countries was the largest in 2011. Meanwhile, share of
Indonesiae export to ASEAN countries and share of
Indonesias import from ASEAN countries was 14% and 19%. It
shows that Indonesia has still become market for ASEAN
countries. The opportunity of ASEAN community has not been
used optimal by Indonesia.
Figure 21. In 10 years, proportion of intra-ASEAN trade to total ASEAN trade has increased, from
21,8% in 2001 to 25% in 2011. Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia have trade surplus in intra-ASEAN
trade for 5 years (Source: ASEAN Community in figure 2011 and Intracen)
Intra-ASEAN Trade Trade Balance intra-ASEAN by Countries
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
25/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 25 of 40
Indonesias Competitiveness in ASEAN
The level of competitiveness of Indonesias transport
infrastructure among ASEAN countries is still relatively low.
Indonesias infrastructure quality was ranked 92nd of 144
countries in the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) in
2012/2013, lower than the Global Competitiveness Report
(GCR) in 2011/2012 which was ranked 82nd out of 142
countries. Of eight ASEAN countries included in the CGR in
2012/2013, the quality of Indonesias infrastructure was
ranked on the third lowest (before Philippines and Vietnam)
and was below the global average of infrastructure quality
rating.
Furthermore, almost all the transport infrastructure quality
suffered a downgrade from the previous year and was below
the global average except the railway infrastructure quality.
The lowest transport infrastructure quality in the CGR in
2012/2013 was the port infrastructure, which was ranked
104th of 144 countries. The rating of the port infrastructure
quality was at the third lowest of the eight ASEAN countries
included in the CGR in 2012/2013. Meanwhile, the road
infrastructure quality and the air transport infrastructure
quality were respectively ranked 90th and 89th out of 144
countries in the CGR in 2012/2013. When compared to the
Share of Export intra-ASEAN Trade by Country, 2011 Share of Import intra-ASEAN Trade by Country, 2011
Figure 22. In intra-ASEAN trade, share of Singapores export to ASEAN countries and share of
Singapores import from ASEAN countries was the largest in 2011. (Source: Intracen)
Others
6% Others
6%
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
26/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 26 of 40
other eight ASEAN countries included in the CGR in
2012/2013, it was the second lowest ranking for the road
infrastructure quality and the third lowest ranking for the airtransport infrastructure.
Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in 2012/2013
Road Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in 2012/2013 Railway Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in
2012/2013
Air Transport Infrastructure Quality Rating in
CGR in 2012/2013Port Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in
2012/2013
Figure 23. Competitive level of the transport infrastructure quality of Indonesia was still relatively
low. In the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) in 2012/2013, Indonesia was ranked 92nd of 144
countries. When compared to other ASEAN countries, the position of the Indonesias infrastructure
ualit was at the third lowest rankin . Source: Global Com etitiveness Re ort
Competitive Level of Transport Infrastructure Quality of
Indonesia
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
27/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 27 of 40
Compared to other ASEAN countries, Indonesia has the
longest road length in ASEAN. But, Indonesias paved network
only 65.85% of road length. This percentage was under
Singapore (100%), Philippines (79.2%), Malaysia (81.1%),
Thailand (94.5%) and Brunei (92.2%). Based on world bank
data, cost to export in Indonesia reached USD 644 per
container in 2012. Indonesia was at 4th the highest of cost to
export in ASEAN. While, cost to import in Indonesia reached
USD 660 per container in 2012 or 4th the lowest of cost to
import in ASEAN.
Road Length in ASEAN countries, 2011 Percentage of Paved Network to Road Length in ASEAN
countries, 2011 (%)
Figure 24. Indonesia has the longest road length in ASEAN but the percentage of paved network to
road length in Indonesia was 6th largest in ASEAN countries. (Source: ASEAN Statistics)
Cost to Export (USD per Container) Cost to Import (USD per Container)
Figure 25. Indonesias Cost to export was at 4th the highest in ASEAN. While Indonesias cost
import was at 4th the lowest in ASEAN. (Source: World Development Indicators)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
28/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
29/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
30/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 30 of 40
To improve domestic connectivity, the Government has issued
a Masterplan for the Acceleration and Expansion of
Indonesias Economic Development (MP3EI) 2011-2025 in
May 2011. Financing of MP3EI for transportation sector was
Proportion of Transport Sector to Nominal GDP
(%)
2012*: cumulative of quarter I to quarter III
Proportion of Transport Sub-sector to Nominal GDP,
2012* (%)
Figure 27. Transport sectors contribution to GDP in 2012* was 3.43%, lower than 2007. Road
transport had the greatest contribution. (Source: BPS)
Growth of Transport Sector and National GDP
(%yoy)
2012*: cumulative of quarter I to quarter III
Growth of Transport Sector GDP, (% yoy)
Figure 28. Growth in the transport sector since 2009 was above the national growth despite the
decline in 2012*. This decrease was because the growth in the air transports and railway transports
decreased significantly. Even since 2011, the growth of railway transports was negative. (Source:
BPS
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
31/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 31 of 40
mainly for road infrastructure. The sources of financing of
MP3EI were from Government, SOE, and Private. However,
the realization of MP3EI is felt not optimal.
The realized investment of MP3EI in 2012 reached IDR 623.91
trillion, IDR 243 billion of which is allocated for road
infrastructure, transports and water resources and energy.
Meanwhile, the indication of MP3EI investment needed in
2014 reached IDR 4,012 trillion. In 2013, the Government planto build twelve of new airport. For port infrastructure, the
Government is going to build ninety one of port and
implement Pendulum Nusantara concept. The Government
also is going to build railway to Soekarno Hatta Airport.
Conclusion
The weak competitiveness of Indonesia compared to other
ASEAN countries is a challenge to be overcome before the
application of the ASEAN connectivity. Indonesia with the
largest population in ASEAN, which amounted to 39.1% of the
total population of ASEAN in 2010, will only be a market forother ASEAN countries if there is no improvement in the
domestic connectivity. Accelerated implementation of the
domestic connectivity concept is very important since the
implementation of the ASEAN connectivity is only 2 years
away.
MP3EI: Indication of Infrastructure Investment (IDR Tn)
Figure 29. Financing of MP3EI for transportation sector was mainly for road infrastructure.
(Source: KP3EI)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
32/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 32 of 40
Commodities Insight: Natural Rubber
M. Ajie Maulendra ([email protected])
Global natural rubber consumption in 2013 is estimated at
11.6 million tons or 4% growth (yoy). Growth in rubber
consumption in 2013 is higher than in 2012 by 2.4% (yoy).
Consumption growth is still coming from the auto sector
growth, especially in China and Asia regions. Meanwhile,
demand from the European Union this year is expected to fall,
because of unsolved recession. As an illustration, the EU
demand for natural rubber in the first half of 2012 fell by 15%
(yoy). A bright outlook of global demand for natural rubber isalso seen in the positive expectations of auto sales in the
United States (U.S.). In Q3 of 2012 and Q4 of 2012, U.S. auto
sales grew by 13.8% (yoy) and 10% (yoy), and the positive
trend is expected to continue in 2013 in line with the
agreement of the U.S. government in the management of
fiscal policy to prevent the United States from the threat of
recession. U.S. auto sales this year is expected to reach 15
million units, up 4.2% from 14.4 million units from the last
year.
Natural rubber consumption growth in Asia is expected to
record positive trend in 2013. As it is supported by the Chinese
governments infrastructure spending plan announced in
September 2012, Chinas natural rubber consumption in 2013
has been forecasted to grow by 5.5% (yoy). These China
infrastructure projects is believed can boost the production of
automotive and transportation sectors. Automobile
purchasing in India also supports Indias rubber demand,
which is expected to grow by 4% (yoy) in 2013. Meanwhile,
Japan is expected to grow only 2% (yoy), given its economic
recovery from the disaster of 2011 is still running slow. As
economic recession is still haunting EU, rubber consumption in
EU in 2013 is expected to fall -0.1% (yoy). On the
otherside,U.S. rubber consumption, which is mostly absorbed
to automotive sector, is forecasted to grow by 4% (yoy) in
2013.
Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia are known as the
International Tripartite Rubber Council (ITRC) because these
three countries become the largest producers of natural
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
33/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 33 of 40
rubber. Thailand became the largest producer of natural
rubber with 3.5 million tons rubber production in 2012, while
Indonesia took in second place with 3 million tons rubberproduction in the same period, followed by Malaysia with
natural rubber production of 946 thousand tons in the same
period.
The worlds natural rubber production in 2013 is forecasted to
grow 4% (yoy) or reach 11.7 million tons. Global rubber
production this year is estimated to be better than last year.
Several assumptions support the reason are favorable climate
condition, restrictions on rubber exports by the three
countries ended in March 2013 will improve rubber price and
provide incentive to farmers in doing tapping. The rubberprice in 2013 (on average) is expected to increase compared
to 2012. Data from the Economist Intelligent Unit (EIU) shows
that the average price of rubber in 2013 is estimated at 3.9
USD/kg, up by 1.4% yoy from 3.8 USD/kg in 2012. Bullish
factors to the rubber price are also caused by the global
rubber stocks in 2013, which are expected to be tighter than
the previous year. This is caused by the impact of export
restrictions by the three countries, which have been
implementing from October 2012 and will have been finished
by March 2013. If rubber price are still under pressure, ITRC
will extend its policy.
Countries of members of rubber manufacturers association or
the International Tripartite Rubber Council (ITRC), Indonesia,
Thailand and Malaysia, agreed to cut exports of 300,000 tons
natural rubber from the three countries this year. This was
motivated by the deteriorating rubber price during the first 8
months of 2012 which reach USD 2.5/kg (in August), or down
by 28% (ytd) from the beginning of 2012 at USD 3.2/kg.
Indonesia gets a rubber export quota reduction of 117 000
tons, Thailand of 140,000 tons and Malaysia of 43,000 tons.
GAPKINDO stated that 117 000 tons reduction in Indonesias
rubber exports was divided into two periods. First, October to
December 2012 period, rubber export cut by 60% or 70,200
tons. Secondly, January to March 2013 rubber export will be
cut by 40% or 46,000 tons. Once the restriction plan was
announced on August 16, 2012, the rubber price (the Daily
Composite Price in the three countries) immediately jumped
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
34/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 34 of 40
from USD 2.54 per kilogram to around USD 2.9 per kilogram in
early December 2012. Currently, the rubber price (rubber
Tokyo market) was at the level of USD 3.3/kg. ITRC will askVietnam to join ITRC to maintain the rubber price stability. In
fact, statistically, Vietnam rubber production also has a fairly
high portion in Southeast Asia (in 2012 it exceeded 860
thousand tons). Four countries, namely Indonesia, Thailand,
Malaysia and Vietnam, will control 74 percent of the world
market.
The Rubber Association of Indonesia (Gabungan Perusahaan
Karet Indonesia Gapkindo) set rubber export allocation for
each region in Indonesia. South Sumatra will be the largest
rubber exporter followed by North Sumatra, Jambi and WestKalimantan. Started on October 1, 2012, during the last three
months of 2012, South Sumatra had rubber export allocation
of 206,779 tons per month. Meanwhile, North Sumatra had
export allocation of 51,037 tons per month, and Jambi of
30,627 tons per month.
3,790
1005777
2,390
1,134
264
1,107
616
94
China
India
Japan
Other
Asia
EU O
ther
Europe
North
America
Latin
America
Africa
0.00
2.00
4.00
6.00
8.00
10.00
12.00
14.00
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F
-15.0%
-10.0%
-5.0%
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
Konsumsi Karet Alam Global Pertumbuhan KonsumsiGlobal Consumption of
Natural RubberProduction Growth
Figure 30. Worlds consumption of natural rubber (left figure). Natural rubber demand in several
contries (right figure). (Source: EIU, IRSG)
Worlds Consumption of Natural Rubber
(Million Ton)Natural rubber demand in Several Countries
(000 tons)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
35/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 35 of 40
Thailand, 31.2%
Others, 7.5%
Vietnam, 7.7%
India, 8.2%
Malaysia, 8.4% Indonesia,
26.8%
Cte d'Ivoire,
2.2%
Brazil, 1.2%
China, 6.8%
Country 2011 2012 Growth
United States 12,733,015 14,440,574 13.4%
China 18,533,406 17,493,506 -5.6%
India 2,512,441 2,563,196 2.0%
Japan 4,210,227 5,031,230 19.5%
Indonesia 894,164 1,026,768 14.8%
Europe 16,850,926 15,049,083 -10.7%
Automotive Sales in Several Countries
(unit)
Shares of Global Natural Rubber Production,
2012
Figure 31. Automotive sales in several countries (left figure). Shares of global natural rubber
production (right figure). (Source: EIU, IRSG)
US Japan China Singapore South Korea
3.
4 3.
8
3.
6
4.
6
6
5.
6
4.
9
4 4.
2
3.
9
3.
7
3.
7
3.
78
3.
9
3.
94
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Q110
Q210
Q310
Q410
Q111
Q211
Q311
Q411
Q112
Q212
Q312
Q412
Q113
Q213
Q313
Q413
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Rubber Price (lhs) WTI Price (rhs)
Worlds Natural Rubber Prices
(USD / kg)Market Shares of Indonesias Natural Rubber
Exports in Some Countries of Major Destination
Figure 32. Worlds natural rubber (left figure). Market shares of Indonesias natural rubber exports
in some countries of major destination (right figure). (Source: EIU)
2.76 2.75
2.4
2.7
3 3.04
2.77
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F
Figure 33. Indonesias Natural Rubber Production. (Source: Ministry of Agriculture)
Indonesias Natural Rubber Production
(mn ton)
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
36/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 36 of 40
mandiri leading economic index (LEI)January2013
Mandiri Leading Economic Index (MLEI) fluctuated in the
range of 99.2 to 100.7 during the period of January to
November 2012. The index has decreased to 100.6 (-
0.1%MoM) in November 2012, from an increased 0.4%MoM
in October 2012. From several constituent indicators of MLEI
such as JCI index, export index, exchange rate index and the
volume of savings index showed a decline in November 2012.
It is predicted that the domestic economy will still experiencea relatively flat growth at current level to 2Q13.
From recent data, Indonesia's trade deficit in November 2012
narrowed from the previous month's record high, but exports
remain weak in line with the uncertainty in global economy.
The trade deficit narrowed to USD 480 million from a record
high USD 1.54 billion in October 2012. In November 2012,
imports rose grew 9.92 % (YoY), slower than October's 10.8%
(YoY) increase. Exports in November 2012 were down 4.6%
(YoY) or less than the previous month's 7.61% (YoY) drop.
Trade deficits in the G20 economy also have put pressure onthe rupiah which weakened around 6,0% against US Dollar in
2012. Indonesia is bracing for stagnant exports due to weak
overseas demand attributed to the sluggish recovery of the
global economy.
Indonesia's GDP (gross domestic product) grew 6.2%YoY in
3Q12 (was above 6,0% for the eighth straight quarter) as
domestic consumption and investment remained strong
despite a deteriorating global economy. Although Indonesia's
economy has so far remained resilient in the face of a global
slowdown, The Government said that Indonesias economymight only expand by about 6.6% this year, versus the initial
forecast of 6.8% as stated in the 2013 State Budget Law and
Rupiah might trade as low as 9,700 per US Dollar in 2013, is
weaker than that stipulated in the 2013 state budget, which
requires the currency to trade at an average of 9,300 to the
greenback.
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
37/40
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
38/40
Oce of Chief EconomistPage 38 of 40
MACRO ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECAST 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F
National Account
Real GDP (% yoy) 6.3 6.0 4.6 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.6Domestic Demand (% yoy) 6.0 7.5 5.4 5.3 5.7 6.6 6.7 7.5
Real Consumption: Private (% yoy) 5.0 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.5
Real Consumption: Government (% yoy) 3.9 10.4 15.7 0.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 5.8
Real Gross Fixed Capital Formation (% yoy) 9.3 11.9 3.3 8.5 8.8 10.8 11.1 11.9
Real Exports (% yoy) 8.5 9.5 (9.7) 15.3 13.6 1.0 4.6 7.0
Real Imports (% yoy) 9.1 10.0 (15.0) 17.3 13.3 4.8 6.5 8.5
GDP (IDR tn) - nominal 3,951 4,949 5,606 6,436 7,427 8,392 9,579 10,893
GDP (USD bn) - nominal 432 511 539 708 846 893 993 1,125
GDP per capita (USD) - nominal 1,916 2,234 2,328 2,981 3,572 3,723 4,090 4,579
External Sector
Exports (%yoy,USD) - Merchandise 14.0 18.3 (14.3) 32.1 27.0 (5.1) 7.0 9.0
Imports (%yoy,USD) - Merchandise 15.4 36.9 (24.0) 43.7 30.3 8.5 9.0 9.0
Trade Balance (USD bn) 32.8 22.9 30.9 30.6 34.8 10.6 7.7 8.4
Current Account (% of GDP) 2.4 0.0 2.0 0.7 0.2 (2.4) (2.3) (1.8)
Current Account (USD bn) 10.5 0.1 10.6 5.1 1.7 (21.7) (23.3) (20.3)
External Debt (% of GDP) 32.7 30.4 32.1 28.6 26.6 27.8 27.5 26.7
International Reserves (USD bn) 56.9 50.0 66.1 96.2 110 111 113 118
Import cover (months) 8.0 5.1 8.9 9.1 8.0 7.4 6.9 6.6
IDR/USD (period average) 9,139 9,692 10,408 9,087 8,776 9,396 9,646 9,681
IDR/USD (year end) 9,235 11,028 9,470 8,963 9,000 9,670 9,606 9,677
Other
BI rate (% period average) 8.4 8.8 6.9 6.5 6.6 5.8 5.8 5.8
BI rate (% year end) 8.0 9.3 6.5 6.5 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.8
Headline Inflation (% yoy, period average) 6.4 10.3 4.3 5.3 5.1 4.3 5.4 4.9
Headline Inflation (% yoy, year end) 6.4 11.1 2.8 7.0 3.8 4.5 5.4 4.7
Fiscal Balance (% of GDP) (1.3) (0.1) (1.6) (0.6) (1.5) (1.6) (1.5) (1.5)
S&P's Rating - FCY BB- BB- BB- BB BB+ BB+ BB+ BB+
S&P's Rating - LCY BB+ BB+ BB+ BB+ BBB- BBB- BBB- BBB-
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
39/40
Oce of Chief Economist Page 39 of 40
Disclaimer: This material is for information only, and we are not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not to beconstrued as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer orsolicitation would be illegal. The information herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do notwarrant that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinion expressed is our current opinion as ofthe date appearing on this material only, and subject to change without notice. It is intended for the use by recipient only andmay not be reproduced or copied/photocopied or duplicated or made available in any form, by any means, or redistributed toothers without written permission of PT Bank Mandiri Tbk. Additional information is available upon request. For furtherinformation please contact: Office of Chief Economist, Ph. (021) 524 5516/5272 or Facs. (021) 521 0430.
INDONESIA CURRENT DATA
2013
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Exchange Rate
End of Period IDR/USD 9393 10900 9390 8978 9069 8990 9023 9146 9189 9400 9433 9467 9581 9589 9608 9594 9658
Average IDR/USD 9354 1167 9462 9021 9059 9071 9020 9251 9175 9320 9442 9451 9505 9565 9599 9620 9634
Monetary Sector
Base money M0, eop IDRtn 379.58 344.69 402.12 518.45 613.49 594.08 578.96 586.03 596.59 604.98 627.36 634.99 657.96 638.87 648.11 647.98 7 04.84
Narrow money M1 IDRtn 450.06 456.79 515.82 605.38 733.99 696.32 683.25 714.25 720.92 749.45 779.41 771.79 772.42 795.51 774.98 801.40
Broa d Money M2 IDRtn 1,649.66 1,883.85 2,141.38 2,469.40 2,877.22 285.49 284.97 291.19 292.72 299.20 305.03 305.48 308.90 312.55 316.77 320.51
Outstanding Loan IDRtn 995.11 1,313.87 1,446.81 1,783.60 2,223.69 218.34 222.77 229.15 234.34 241.17 248.00 249.87 253.92 258.42 261.50 266.10
O ut st an di ng D ep os it I DR tn 1 ,4 59 .4 4 1, 67 3. 82 1 ,9 14 .1 1 2 ,2 08 .7 2 2 ,5 96 .3 3 2 ,5 40 .2 4 2 ,5 67 .3 6 2 ,6 24 .5 1 2 ,6 36 .0 4 2 ,6 97 .1 0 2 , 73 5. 35 2 ,7 38 ,9 26 .0 9 2 ,7 61 ,2 30 2 ,7 99 ,0 56 2 ,8 34 ,5 44 2 ,8 77 ,1 01
Lending rate (working capital) % p.a 13.00 15.22 13.69 12.83 12.16 12.09 12.02 12.01 11.86 11.78 11.79 11.78 11.73 11.70 11.68 11.61
3-month deposit rate, eop % p.a 7.42 11.97 6.85 7.06 6.81 6.68 6.52 6.31 6.00 5.89 5.76 5.67 5.61 5.69 5.66 5.81
Overnight rate, eop % p.a 4.50 9.40 6.24 5.72 4.55 4.02 3.75 3.76 3.76 3.93 4.05 4.06 4.09 4.10 4.18 4.15 4.19
Prices
Headline CPI (2007=100) Index 155.5 113.86 117.03 1 25.17 129.91 130.9 130.96 131.05 131.32 131.41 132.23 133.16 134.43 134.45 134.67 134.76 135.49
Year on year inflation rate % 6.59 11.06 2.78 6.96 3.79 3.65 3.56 3.97 4.50 4.45 4.53 4.56 4.58 4.31 4.61 4.32 4.30
Month on month inflation rate % 1.1 -0.04 0.33 0.92 0.57 0.76 0.05 0.07 0.21 0.07 0.62 0.70 0.95 0.01 0.16 0.07 0.54
Year to date inflation rate % N/A 11.06 2.78 6.96 3.79 0.76 0.81 0.88 1.09 1.15 1.79 2.50 3.48 3.49 3.66 3.73 4.30
Wholesale Price Index (2000=100) Index 217 238.0 167.35 1 77.87 185.76 187.11 187.77 188.54 189.45 189.72 190.22 190.76 191.81 192.11 192.19 192.00 192.06
Trade
Export USDbn 10.86 8.69 13.35 1 6.83 17.20 15.49 15.69 17.25 16.17 16.82 15.44 16.10 14.05 15.89 15.32 16.44
Oil USDbn 2.51 1.24 2.50 3.26 3.60 2.97 3.35 3.48 3.56 3.72 2.89 2.91 2.78 2.77 2.65 2.70
Non oil USDbn 8.36 7.45 10.85 13.57 13.60 12.51 12.33 13.76 12.61 13.11 12.55 13.17 11.26 13.12 12.67 13.73
Import USDbn 6.81 6.29 10.33 13.15 16.34 14.55 14.86 16.32 16.93 17.03 16.72 16.35 13.81 15.34 17.21 16.92
Oil USDbn 2.39 0.98 2.10 2.64 3.63 2.98 3.49 4.00 4.12 3.44 3.35 2.76 3.31 3.44 3.83 4.06
Non oil USDbn 4.42 5.31 8.22 1 0.50 12.71 11.53 11.37 12.31 12.81 13.60 13.37 13.60 10.55 11.90 13.38 12.85
Trade Balance USDbn 4.06 2.40 3.02 3.68 0.86 0.94 0.83 0.93 (0.76) (0.21) (1.28) (0.25) 0.24 0.55 -1.89 -0.48
Output
G DP ( cu rren t p rice ) I DR tn 1034.86 1274.29 1450.82 1670.52 1921.56 1972.35 2050.09 212.28
GDP (constant price at 2000) IDRtn 493.37 518.94 547.54 585.10 623.96 632.77 650.58 671.47
Real Growth % YoY 5.88 5.20 5.43 6.89 6.49 6.32 6.37 6.17
Capital Market
JCI Index, eop Index 2 74 5. 83 1 35 5.4 1 25 34 .3 6 3 70 3. 51 38 21. 99 39 41 .6 9 3 98 5.2 1 4 12 1.5 5 4 18 0. 73 3 832 .82 3 955 .57 4 142 .3 3 4 06 0. 33 4 262 .5 6 4,350.29 4,276.14 4,316.68
Volume, avg shares mn 3 15 5. 65 1 74 3.2 5 34 22 .1 0 3 96 5. 38 34 96. 38 40 45 .4 9 3 48 2.6 0 2 75 1.1 6 4 40 7. 93 3 092 .99 2 936 .69 2 529 .6 6 2 62 4. 87 3 796 .5 5 3,916.49 5,289.28 3,059.99
Value, avg IDRbn 4 34 0. 55 1 45 4.6 1 23 32 .4 2 3 95 9. 30 26 84. 29 32 69 .5 0 4 16 1.3 9 3 77 3.3 0 4 10 3. 34 3 967 .34 3 216 .60 3 347 .2 3 3 06 8. 91 3 518 .6 7 3,623.31 6,734.35 3,868.71
Consumer Confidence Index 99.10 90.60 108.70 109.30 116.60 119.20 111.70 107.30 102.50 109.00 114.40 113.50 115.70 117.70 119.50 120.10 1 16.40
2011Indicators Unit 20102012
2007 2008 2009
-
7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811
40/40