nbf p 17264811

Upload: erlanggaherp

Post on 14-Apr-2018

224 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    1/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    2/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    3/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 3 of 40

    What about the prospects for both indicators in 2013? For

    inflation, as long as no government policy on the subsidized

    fuel price increases, it is expected that inflation will remain

    subdued, despite a 15% hikes in electricity tariff and an

    average increase of the provincial minimum wage by around

    20%. Mandiri economic team expects inflation to be at 5.4%

    with core inflation remained under control at a range of 5%. A

    positive factor of our economic growth is balanced growth on

    both sides, i.e. the demand side (private consumption) and the

    production side (investment). As a result, the price stability

    can be maintained, reflected by stable core inflation. The

    absence of an increase in subsidized fuel price will make

    inflation indeed remain low in 2013; however, the cost to be

    borne is the ballooning budget of subsidized fuel in the 2013state budget to nearly IDR 200 trillion, or about 12% of the

    total state budget of 2013. This surely cannot be maintained if

    we want to continue to balance the domestic sector in the

    medium term. The government must courageously take a fuel

    price adjustment policy, given the distortion of the non-

    subsidized fuel price and the subsidized fuel price is so large,

    reaching more than 2 times. This large price distortion will not

    give incentives to the running of the energy conversion

    program and even it will encourage inefficiency in the use of

    energy resources as well as further encourage the smuggling

    of subsidized fuel. As a result, it is possible that the realizationof subsidized fuel in the 2013 state budget will exceed its

    budget as it did in the last 2012 state budget.

    And what about the prospect of our trade balance? The low

    global demand as economic recovery in developed countries

    takes slower than expected will surely give a limited space for

    our exports to return to normal. Instead, the rapid investment

    growth and robust private consumption along with the

    growing middle class society will encourage the growth of

    imports along this year. Moreover, in the absence of an

    appropriate policy on subsidized fuel, the consumption ofsubsidized fuel is estimated to exceed the Governments

    target, which will further encourage increased imports. As a

    result, the deficit in our trade balance is expected to continue

    to occur this year or in other words the external sector

    imbalances will continue this year.

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    4/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    5/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 5 of 40

    to depreciate, lowers Loan to Value ratio and raises Down

    Payment for property and automotive sectors and raises

    interest rates of Bank Indonesia Deposit Facility (FASBI) by 25

    basis points in August 2012. These policies aim to restrain

    import growth acceleration and less productive investments.

    The combination of these policies is expected to be reapplied

    by BI in 2013 when the deficit in the trade balance

    deteriorates, thus expanding our current account deficit.

    From the government side, some policies that have been and

    will be conducted by the government include encouraging

    downstream industries so as to reduce dependence on

    imported raw materials and capital goods, application of

    export duties and regulations on trade and provision of taxincentives for some strategic industries in tax holiday for 5-10

    years to improve the competitiveness of national industries. In

    the near future the Government will also implement a policy

    on tightening importation of consumer goods, such as mobile

    phones, laptops and tablet computers in order to encourage

    domestic production and reduce imports of consumer goods.

    These policies are aimed to encourage companies producing

    these products to make Indonesia its production base of their

    business and not just using Indonesia as a market for their

    products. Thus, the impact on Indonesia will be more positive,

    because it can create new jobs for Indonesian workers.

    If the above steps and policies are executed consistently and

    continuously by the Government and BI, it is expected that

    our external imbalance problems can be overcome in the

    medium term. Of course, the classic problem in our economy

    over the years ie. the availability of adequate infrastructure,

    must also be our common concern and need to be improved.

    Thus, Indonesias sustainable economic growth can be realized

    through a balance in domestic and external sectors.

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    6/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 6 of 40

    Bond Market Outlook 2013

    Handi Yunianto ([email protected])

    Low yield, higher volatility

    Rupiah bond market again delivered strong gains in the last

    four years although the return continued to decline, as the

    yields have extremely been low. Foreign fund inflows and

    warehousing of government bonds by Bank Indonesia

    remained as the key pillars of support for the bond market in

    2012.

    For 2013, we expect yields to remain low but with increased

    volatility and minimal scope for bond prices to appreciate

    further. Some catalysts that will support low yields in 2013:

    Low inflation and flush liquidity as a result of the ultra-loose

    monetary policies resorted by most central banks , Bank

    Indonesia still is projected to be the big potential buyer of

    government bonds to speed up its plan to use the bonds as

    monetary instruments to replace SBI. We expect the 10-year

    government bonds will trade between 5.2-5.5% in 2013, thus

    we believe the return of investing in the government bonds

    this year will be lower than 2012. Volatility might increase, as

    foreigners still dominate the government bond ownership,

    while the rupiah is still under pressure, trading above to IDR

    9.800 against the US dollar.

    Three risks that must be considered are: (1) higher supply of

    government bonds due to potentially increasing budget deficit

    (2) higher inflation if government increases subsidized fuel

    prices and (3) expectation of rupiah further weakening that

    can trigger foreign fund outflows.

    Bond outlook for 2013: yields to remain low but volatility

    might increase

    As the yields has extremely low level compared to history and

    global economic outlook will likely record a mild recovery,

    assessing bond market outlook 2013 will be more challenging

    than usual. However, we still believe that low yields might be

    sustained but higher volatility in 2013, as foreigners remain

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    7/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 7 of 40

    dominant in government bonds and rupiah currency trading

    closed to IDR 9.800 levels against US dollar.

    Some catalysts to support low yields in 2013

    There are at least four factors to support low yield in our view:

    1. Interest rate will remain low. Austerity measure

    undertaken by the Euro area, lackluster economy in the US

    and economic slowdown in China hampered global

    economic recovery. The IMF revised down its world

    economic growth forecast to 3.3% and 3.6% in 2012 and

    2013 from 3.5% and 3.9% respectively in October forecast.

    With fiscal problem continue, we believe ultra low interest

    rate will be kept longer that will make demand for higher-yielding assets should remain firm. According to

    Bloomberg market consensus survey, Fed Fund Rate and

    ECB rate projected at lower rate i.e. 0.25% until mid 2015

    and 0.75% until mid of 2014. On domestic news, we

    expect inflation rate will remain within the range of BIs

    target although at upper bound of the 3.5-5.5% due to

    increasing electricity tariff and assuming no increase in

    fuel price subsidies. Thus, BI rate will likely be kept stable

    at 5.75%.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Dec-04

    Dec-05

    Dec-06

    Dec-07

    Dec-08

    Dec-09

    Dec-10

    Dec-11

    Dec-12

    Dec-13

    Rate(%)

    FFR

    ECB rate

    Figure 1. The IMF revise down its world economic growth forecast to 3.6% in 2013 from 3.9% in

    October forecast (left figure). Low interest rate will keep longer that will make demand on higher-

    yielding asset should remain firm (right figure). (Source: IMF, Bloomberg)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    8/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 8 of 40

    2. Indonesias economic fundamental has proven its

    resiliency. Solid domestic demand and significant growing

    in investment make Indonesian source of growth morebalance and it make more resilient to global economic

    slowdown. Our economist expects economy is likely to

    remain robust in 2013 at 6.3%. The impact of the global

    economic slowdown, we believe, is to be limited as it

    could be compensated by the domestic demand supported

    by healthy consumer purchasing power, lower cost of

    fund, and faster infrastructure development. The increase

    in minimum wage will also be one of the catalysts, as it

    transfers income from capital owners to

    households/labors. Investment spending will also be

    projected to continue to be strong on the back of foreigndirect investment and infrastructure development.

    3. Continue stronger fiscal health. When the average debts

    to GDP ratio for countries in the developed world is on

    average at 114% and rising, meanwhile in Indonesia the

    ratio in only 38% as of Sep12 and will likely continue to

    fall. This will support low yields relative to the developed

    world. Meanwhile, the budget deficit level is still

    maintained at a safe level of only IDR 153.3tn (1.7% of

    GDP), and the ratio of government debt is also targeted to

    continue to decline to a level of 23% of the GDP 2013.Solid economic fundamentals will be positive for bonds

    market as the sovereign rating is projected to be

    maintained at investment-grade level with stable outlook.

    1.9

    2.7 2.93.1

    0.6

    2.1

    2.6 2.4

    (2.0)

    (1.0)

    -

    1.0

    2.0

    3.0

    4.0

    5.0

    6.0

    7.0

    2006 2011 9M12 3Q12

    GDP growth contribution

    (ppt)

    Net exports

    Gross Fixed Capital Formation

    Government spending

    Private consumption

    BBB-

    BB+

    BB-

    B+

    B-

    B

    B+

    BB-

    BB

    BB+

    BBB-

    Jun-97

    Dec-97

    Jan-98

    Feb-98

    Mar-98

    Aug-02

    Nov-03

    Jan-05

    Feb-08

    Jan-10

    Dec-11

    Fitch Rating For Indonesia's Sovereign Debt

    S&P : BB+ (Positive)

    Moody's : Ba1 (Stable)

    Fitch : BBB- (Stable)

    Figure 2. Indonesia GDP still projected 6.3% although global economic tend to weaken; private

    consumption and investment are engine of growth (left figure). Stronger fiscal health will be

    maintained Indonesia investment grade level in 2013 (right figure). (Source: CEIC, DMO)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    9/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 9 of 40

    4. Supply of government bonds to be higher in 2013, but

    still manageable, as government will issue new

    instruments. Higher issuance of government bonds is

    inevitable as the government uses it as the main source of

    funding for its budget deficit. The budget deficit is

    expected to be 1.7% of GDP or IDR 153.3tn in 2013.

    Although it is expected to be lower than in 2012 (IDR

    190tn but the realization might be lower to deficit IDR

    156tn), the net bond issuance is expected to rise to around

    IDR 178tn as it plans to reduce offshore loans by IDR

    19.4tn. As maturing bonds in 2013 will reach IDR 80tn, the

    government is projected to issue IDR 281.3tn in gross

    amount, including bond buyback. Although higher

    issuances, total outstanding government bonds to GDPwas still projected low i.e. 16% as of 2013 vs. 16.2% in

    2012. In addition, government also plans to issue new

    instrument in 2013 i.e. USD issuances for domestic and

    opening the green shoe option to fulfill the target.

    Hopefully, this plan will generate deeper financial system

    and attract further USD liquidity parked offshore.

    If we compare with the 2012 strategy, there are no significant

    policy changes in government securities financing strategy.

    1. Optimizing domestic market by issuing rupiah bonds.

    According to debt management strategy, government will

    continue to issue bonds more on domestic rather than

    global issuances. In 2012, the government reduced global

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    DebttoGDP%

    1.1

    0.5

    0.9

    1.3

    0.1

    1.6

    0.7

    1.3

    2.2

    1.7

    -50

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    2004

    2005

    2006

    2007

    2008

    2009

    2010

    2011

    2012

    2013

    Rp tn

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    % of GDP

    Other/Non Debt-Nett

    External Loan - Nett

    Goc't Securites - Nett

    Budget Deficit, % of GDP

    Government

    securities financing

    strategy in 2013: not

    change significantly

    Figure 3. Government uses bond issuances as the main source of funding for budget deficit (left

    figure). However debt to GDP ratio continues to decline (right figure). (Source: DMO)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    10/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 10 of 40

    bond issuances slightly to 21% of total gross issuance

    although slightly higher than initial target of 18% and

    average 23% in the last five years. The government again

    plan the maximum global bond issuance is 14% of the total

    issuances for 2013. It will be including plan to sell

    USD500mn-1bn for domestic investors in 2H 2013. Thus, it

    will need to issue IDR 241.9tn in the local currency

    including private placement and retail bonds-in the form

    of conventional and syariah papers- in 2013. Assuming

    that private placement and retail bond issuance will be the

    same as in 2012 of IDR 26.3tn and IDR 15.3tn respectively,

    the government still needs to issue IDR 16.7tn on average

    per month or slightly higher than IDR 14.3tn in 2012.

    2. Maintain front loading policy. We still believe that the

    government will do front-loading strategy in order to

    mitigate the impacts of global uncertainties. This strategy

    will also be in line with government maturity profile, which

    projected more than IDR 48tn governments bonds will

    mature in 1H while only IDR 32tn in 2H 2013. Government

    announced new benchmark series for 2013 i.e. 5-yr

    FR0066, 10-yr FR0063, 15-yr FR0064 and 20-yr FR0065.

    0%

    10%

    20%

    30%

    40%

    50%

    60%

    70%

    80%

    90%

    100%

    2009 2010 2011 2012

    1Q 2Q 3Q 4Q

    87.0102.4

    137.2

    174.1

    212.9241.9

    39.3

    46.7

    25.2

    30.4

    55.9

    39.4

    -

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013-

    Target

    Rpt

    rillion

    0%

    5%

    10%

    15%

    20%

    25%

    30%

    35%

    Do me st ic I ssu an ce s G lobal I ssuan ce s

    % Global to t otal issuances (RHS)

    Figure 4. Continue optimizing domestic market by issuing rupiah bonds (left figure). We expect

    front loading policy will continue (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    11/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 11 of 40

    Bonds

    MaturityDate Coupon(%) Duration(yrs) Price as of31-Dec-12 YTM (%)

    FR066 May-18 5.25 4.7 102.74 4.67

    FR063 May-23 5.625 8.0 104.25 5.09

    FR064 May-28 6.125 10.2 103.85 5.74

    FR065 May-33 6.625 11.6 106.18 6.09

    3. Lengthening liability duration. With flattened yield curve

    and government aim to mitigate refinancing risk, we

    believe that government will continue to lengthening their

    duration liability as they projected to issue more long-term

    debts, with those over 10 years targeted to be 57% of the

    total issuances, while the 1-year notes only 14%.

    2011 2012 2013F

    Budget deficit 88 190 153

    % of GDP 1.3 2.2 1.7Net Issuances 121 160 178

    Redemption and

    Buyback84 109 104

    Gross issuances 205 269 282

    Domestic bonds 174 85% 213 79% 243 86%

    Conventional FR/VR 99 48% 123 45%

    T-bills/ZC bonds 41 20% 31 11%

    Retail bonds (ORI &

    Sukuk)18 9% 26 9%

    Domestic sukuk 5 2% 17 6%

    Private placement 11 5% 15 5%

    Global bonds 30 15% 56 21% 39 14%

    Yankee bonds 21 10% 39 14%

    Global sukuks 9 4% 10 3%Samurai bonds 0% 7 2%

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    Q1

    Q2

    Q3

    Q4

    Rp trillion

    Fixed

    Fixed Retail

    Non tradale

    Sukuk Ijarah

    Sukuk Ijarah Retail

    Zero Coupon Bill

    Zero Coupon Bond

    Figure 5. New government bond benchmark series for 2013 (left figure). More than IDR 48 tn bonds

    will mature in 1H while only IDR 32 tn in 2H 2013 (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)

    Figure 6. Lengthening government bonds liability duration might continue (left figure). Gross

    issuances by instrument: Sukuk issuance projected to increase (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri

    estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    12/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 12 of 40

    After foreigners and bank Indonesia became the biggest net

    buyer in 2012, we believe that it will be the same for 2013 due

    to the low yields offer currently in market. Foreigners booked

    the highest net buy of the government bonds followed by

    Bank Indonesia, who together snapped up almost 69% of net

    issuances in 2012. Pension funds and mutual funds we believe

    will continue to switch their portfolios from government

    bonds to time deposit, corporate bonds and the stock market

    to enhance their returns. Demand from mutual funds might

    also continue to lessen since a 5% tax will be slapped on

    mutual fund industry over this year and it will give the same

    tax treatment of 15% in 2014. In 2012, mutual funds cut their

    portfolio in government bonds a total IDR 3.9tn. While

    pension funds government bonds add quite significant by IDR

    22.1n, but we believe the data is misleading as theres IDR

    22.8tn of transfer bonds from insurances happened in 4-Dec

    and 26-Dec which should be the same entity. Excluding

    transfer transaction, pension fund portfolio in government

    bonds fell by IDR 0.7tn in 2012 after reporting net sell of IDR

    3.1tn in the last two consecutive years.

    Bank Indonesia is still buying government bonds to speed up

    its plan to use the bonds as monetary-policy instruments to

    manage liquidity in the financial market to replace SBI. Bank

    Indonesias active purchases of government bonds will notboost liquidity as the central bank absorbs back some of the

    liquidity through reverse-repo deals. In 2012, BI bought

    government bonds totaling IDR 18.7tn although lower than

    2011 which reported IDR 42.8tn, but reverse repo with banks

    totaling IDR 81.4tn or almost 18% of their Open Market

    Operation (OMO) (vs. only 12% in 2011). Under the base

    scenario, BI would need to buy an additional IDR 78tn

    assuming excess liquidity growth is in line with nominal GDP

    (11%), SBI outstanding constant (IDR 78.9tn) and increasing

    tradable securities to 47% of OMO. We calculate that

    weighted average yield to maturity of government bondsowned by Bank Indonesia is 6.3%. We believe this is the

    support level for rupiah bond market in 2013, currently the

    average yield to maturity of government bond is 5.5%.

    Demand outlook: We

    believe there will be no

    significant changes in

    bond investors in 2013

    Bank Indonesia is still

    projected to be the big

    potential buyer of

    government bonds to

    speed up its plan to use

    the bonds as monetary

    instrument to replace

    SBI.

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    13/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 13 of 40

    *) based on survey by MoF

    **) Theres IDR 22.8tn of transfer bonds from insurances happened in 4-Dec and 26-Dec which should be the same entity.

    Excluding transfer transaction, pension fund portfolio in government bonds fell by IDR 0.7tn in 2012 after reporting net

    sell of IDR 3.1tn in the last two consecutive years.

    According to the latest survey by the Ministry of Finance, the

    net potential demand for government bonds for 2013 is

    projected to reach almost IDR 80tn. This is still lower than its

    2010 NetBuy

    2010 %ownership

    2011 NetBuy

    2011 %ownership

    2012 NetBuy

    2012 %ownership

    2013 NetBuy*)

    Foreigners 87.3 30 27.6 31 47.7 33 n.a

    Banks (39.4) 33 (5.1) 29 10.9 27 32.7

    Bank Indonesia (2.4) 4 42.8 9 18.7 10 n.a

    Onshore-non banks 13.8 33 17.1 31 19.4 30 47.2

    Insurances **) 6.7 12 13.8 13 (9.5) 10 2.4

    Mutual Funds 5.9 8 (3.9) 7 (3.9) 5 6.0

    Pension Funds **) (0.8) 6 (2.4) 5 22.1 7 12.4

    Others 2.0 7 9.6 7 10.7 8 26.4

    Total 59.3 100 82.4 100 96.7 100

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    Feb-11 May-11 Aug-11 Nov-11 Feb-12 May-12 Aug-12 Nov-12

    R

    pT

    rillion

    Government Bonds owned by Bank Indonesia

    SBI

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

    % of OMO

    20,000

    30,000

    40,000

    50,000

    60,000

    70,000

    80,000

    90,000BI's

    ownership in

    government

    bonds (Rp bn)

    Figure 8. Bank Indonesia continues buying government bonds to speed up its plan to use the bonds

    as monetary policy instruments (left figure). Reserve repo continues to increase in OMO of Bank

    Indonesia (right figure). (Source: Bloomberg, Mandiri estimate)

    Figure 7. New government bond benchmark series for 2013 (left figure). More than IDR 48 tn bonds

    will mature in 1H while only IDR 32 tn in 2H 2013 (right figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    14/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 14 of 40

    issuance target for this year, but the survey does not include

    retail and global bond issuances. The highest demand might

    be coming from banks i.e. IDR 53.4tn followed by others and

    pension funds, which are projected to be IDR 25.1tn and IDR

    12.4tn respectively.

    We made a portfolio simulation to compare their performance

    due to some yield curve scenario in 2013. There are three

    scenarios (1) Yield curve stable at current level. As yield curve

    in 2012 has normal shape, thus investors can sell the bonds at

    lower yields by YE13 we called it riding the yield curve. (2)

    Using implied forward yield curve (3) Using fair yield

    regression model assuming that BI rate stable at 5.75%,

    inflation rises slightly to 5.5%, the rupiah appreciate slightly to9,600 and the Fed Fund Rate stable at 0.25% thus the two-and

    ten-year bond yields are predicted to be 4.7% and 5.4% in

    2013. From three scenarios, we found that the barbell

    strategy will give the optimum performance this year but the

    return is much lower than 2012. We also suggest overweight

    on corporate bonds with good ratings, as their risk premiums

    are still higher than the average long-term spread.

    Yield movement

    outlook and their

    potential returns

    in 2013

    4.5

    4.8

    5.2

    5.9

    6.3

    5.6

    6.1

    6.4

    5.1

    4.8

    5.0

    4.7

    5.4

    6.1

    6.5

    4.0

    4.5

    5.0

    5.5

    6.0

    6.5

    7.0

    0 5 10 15 20

    Time to maturity (yrs)

    YTM (%)

    Scenario 1: Yield curve stable

    Scenario 2: Implied Forward

    Scenario 3: Fair yield model

    4.6 4.6 4.64.5

    1.9

    2.83.0

    3.3

    3.6

    3.2

    2.6

    3.8

    -

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    FR0063 FR0064 FR0065 FR0066

    Expected Total

    Return 2013 (%)

    Scenario1: Yield curve stable

    Scenario 2: Implied forwardl

    Scenario 3: Fair yield model

    Meanwhile, latest

    survey by MoF

    showed that Banks

    and Others investors

    are the highest net

    potential demand for

    government bonds in

    2013.

    Figure 9. Yield curve scenario in 2013 (left figure). Projected lower bonds return expectations in

    2013 (right figure). (Source: Mandiri estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    15/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 15 of 40

    There are still some critical risk factors in our opinion that

    might drag down return in bond market in 2013:

    1. Weakening rupiah following deteriorating current

    account data

    The rupiahs movement against the US dollar will be the

    most critical factor to be watched as foreign investors

    holding in the governments rupiah bonds is still high.

    Historically, the rupiahs depreciation usually triggered

    fund outflows as foreigners tried to reduce exchange rate

    risks. Widen current account deficit underpinned by

    weaker exports, stronger import growth, and higher

    income repatriation from FDI might increase pressure on

    the rupiah currency. Based on our sensitivity calculations,if the USD rises above IDR9,828/USD, it can trigger foreign

    outflows since the average entry point of foreigners into

    Indonesia's government bond market since 2009 is

    IDR9,130/USD and average yield at 7.8%.

    2. Increasing inflation due to risk increase in subsidized fuelprices

    Rising inflation could be triggered by increase in subsidized

    fuel prices in 2013. As the government delayed the fuel

    price subsidy increase this year, fuel subsidies are rising

    significantly. In 2012, energy subsidies are projected reach

    3.6% of GDP (IDR306tn) or higher than in 2008 and 2005 of

    2.8% and 3.5% of GDP respectively when subsidized fuel

    However, there are

    two main risks

    investing in thegovernment bonds

    2013: weaker rupiah

    against USD and

    rising inflation.

    (40,000)

    (30,000)

    (20,000)

    (10,000)

    -

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

    Rp

    bn

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    Aerage

    YTM%

    Foregn inflow/(outflow) - LHS

    YTM - RHS

    (40,000)

    (30,000)

    (20,000)

    (10,000)

    -

    10,000

    20,000

    30,000

    Jul-09 Jan-10 Jul-10 Jan-11 Jul-11 Jan-12 Jul-12

    Rpbn

    8,000

    8,500

    9,000

    9,500

    10,000

    10,500

    IDR

    /USD

    Foregn inflow/(outflow) - LHS

    IDR - RHS

    Figure 10. Average entry level of foreign into Indonesias government bond market since 2009 was

    average yield at 7.7% (left figure). Average entry level of foreign into Indonesias government bond

    market since 2009 was IDR 9,130/USD (left figure). (Source: DMO, Mandiri estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    16/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    17/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 17 of 40

    As a conclusion, for 2013 we expect low yields might be

    sustained but with higher volatility and minimal bond price

    appreciation. Some positive factors: (1) low inflation and flush

    liquidity as a result of the ultra-loose monetary policies

    resorted by most central banks and (2) Bank Indonesia is still

    projected to be the big potential buyer of government bonds

    to speed up its plan to use the bonds as monetary instrument

    to replace SBI. We look for the 10-year government bonds will

    trade at range of between 5.2-5.5% in 2013, thus we believe

    the return of investing in government bonds will be lower

    than 2012. To enhance the return, we maintain suggestion to

    overweight on corporate bonds with good ratings, as their risk

    premiums are still higher than the average long-term spread.

    Risk factors that must be considered are: (1) higher supply ofgovernment bonds (2) higher inflation if government increases

    subsidized fuel prices (3) weakening in the rupiah following

    deteriorating BoP data that can trigger foreign fund outflows.

    IDR corporate bond market outlook 2013: Continue to

    improve

    Corporate rupiah bond market continues to improve as new

    issuances reported IDR 69.3tn the highest in history. We

    believe there are four factors behind significantly corporate

    bonds issuances Rupiah in 2012:

    1. Lower risk-free yields that make cost of borrowing in

    bond market continue to decline.

    2. Refinancing motives are higher as there are IDR 24tn

    bonds matured in 2012.

    3. Robust domestic economic growth will trigger

    companies to expanse their business. Thus, total

    issuances continue to be higher than maturing bonds

    (IDR 58.8tn vs. IDR 24.2tn in 2012). The only amount of

    issuance which is less than the matured one happened

    in 2008, as yield rose significantly amid soaringsubprime mortgage crisis in US.

    4. New regulation by Bapepam-LK on Continual Public

    Offering (Penerbitan Umum Berkelanjutan) that allows

    companies easier to issue bonds as it only requires a

    one effective statement for a period of two years. Note

    that there is 25 companies used this new regulation

    totaling IDR 44.4tn issuances in 2012.

    Total issuances in

    2012 recorded the

    highest in history; we

    still expect issuances

    will remain high in2013

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    18/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 18 of 40

    We believe that all those factors will still be positive for 2013.

    As we expect that risk-free yields would continue to remain

    low this year, we believe appetite for corporate bond issuance

    is also still high. In 2013 and 2014 there is also IDR 22.8tn and

    IDR 31.9tn which will mature, also trigger refinancing motives

    to remain high in 2013. We expect total issuances of

    corporate bonds will range IDR 50-60tn this year. Multi

    finances and banking still the most dominant sector that

    issued bonds. However, the trend is declining as some new

    sectors starting coming to the market such as infrastructure,

    property and mining.

    In the secondary market, trading activity is also rising

    following higher demand as government bond yields

    continued to decline. Trading volume reported IDR 0.6tn on

    average per day or almost double compared to average last

    two years. Liquidity risk in corporate bonds also lower asforeign ownership in corporate bonds also continued to

    increase to 5.7% from 4.8% from total outstanding in 2011.

    We still maintain our prediction that corporate bonds will

    continue to improve in 2013 both in the primary and

    secondary markets.

    Financial

    Company

    40%

    Banking

    26%

    Consumer

    Goods

    9%

    Telecommunica

    tion

    7%

    Automotive

    Related Industry

    5%

    Mining Oil &

    Natural Gas

    3%

    Property &

    Construction

    6%

    Transportasi

    0%

    Infrastructure

    2%

    Advertising,

    Printing & Media

    2%

    30.0

    12.9

    29.7

    38.944.8

    69.3

    13.3

    24.4

    13.9 12.4 11.7

    27.5

    84.6

    73.0

    88.8

    115.3

    148.4

    190.2

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    200

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    New Issuances

    Matured

    Outstandings

    Figure 13. Total outstanding amount of Rupiah corporate bonds continue to increase (left figure).

    However, financial companies still dominate issuance (66.5% of total issuance in 2012) (left figure).

    (Source: IDX)

    Liquidity risk is lower

    as trading volume

    continue to improve

    due to high average

    size issuances per

    series and increasing

    foreign ownership

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    19/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 19 of 40

    Since global crisis in 2008, most of local investor institution

    has limited their investing in corporate bonds only at very high

    rating at least A rated. As almost 95% of corporate bonds

    ownership is dominated by local investors, thus new issuances

    -

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

    x

    -

    500

    1,000

    1,500

    2,000

    2,500

    Rpb

    n

    Average trading volume per day

    Freq trading

    3.0%

    3.5%

    4.0%

    4.5%

    5.0%

    5.5%

    6.0%

    Jan-11 Apr-11 Jul-11 Oct-11 Jan-12 Apr-12 Jul-12

    %o

    ftotalouts

    0

    1,000

    2,000

    3,000

    4,000

    5,000

    6,000

    7,000

    8,000

    9,000

    10,000

    Rpbn

    Portfolio amount (RHS)

    Share of total outs (LHS)

    Bonds NameMaturity

    DateRating

    Duration

    (yrs)

    Coupon

    (%)

    Outstanding

    (RP bn)

    Avg trading

    volume per

    day (Rp bn)

    Last

    transaction

    Date

    Price YTM (%)

    PNBN04SB Subordinasi Bank Panin I I I Tahun

    2010

    17-Nov idAA-

    /A+(idn)

    3.8 10.5 2,460 24 27-Dec-12 100 10.5

    MEGA01 Subordinasi Bank Mega Tahun 2007 13-Jan BBB(idn) 0.1 11.5 1,000 21 27-Dec-12 100.03 10.7

    ASDF01CCN1 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap I

    Tahun 2012 Seri C

    17-Feb idAA+ 3.5 8.6 2,250 6 3-Jan-13 100.3 8.51

    ADMF01CCN3 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap III

    Tahun 2012 Seri C

    17-Sep idAA+ 3.9 8.75 673 9 14-Dec-12 100.05 8.74

    ADMF01BCN3 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap III

    Tahun 2012 Seri B

    15-Sep idAA+ 2.5 7.75 578 19 28-Dec-12 100 7.75

    ASDF01ACN2 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Tahap II

    Tahun 2012 Seri A

    13-Oct idAA+ 0.8 6.65 589 16 3-Jan-13 100.08 6.54

    APLN02 Agung Podomoro Sei II Tahun 2012 17-Aug idA 3.8 9.38 1,200 10 2-Jan-13 100 9.37

    ISAT08B Indosat Seri VIII Tahun 2012 Seri B 22-Jun idAA+ 6.6 8.88 1,500 7 28-Dec-12 105.64 8.02

    BNGA02SB Subordinasi I I Bank CIMB Niaga

    Tahun 2010

    20-Dec AA(idn) 5.5 10.85 1,600 9 26-Dec-12 107.9 9.43

    SANF02C SAN Finance II Tahun 2012 Seri C 15-Jan AA(idn); 1.9 8.4 807 11 26-Dec-12 101.89 7.4

    BMTR01B Global Mediacom I Tahun 2012 Seri

    B

    17-Jul idA+ 3.6 10.5 1,000 18 2-Jan-13 100 10.5

    BBTN01CN1 Obligasi Berkelanjutan I Bank BTN

    Tahap I Tahun 2012

    22-Jun idA A/AA (id

    n)

    6.7 7.9 2,000 9 21-Dec-12 101.15 7.73

    ISAT08A Indosat VIII Tahun 2012 Seri A 19-Jun idAA+ 5 8.63 1,200 8 14-Dec-12 103.42 7.95

    MEDC03 Medco Energi Internasional I II Tahun

    2012

    17-Jun idAA- 3.8 8.75 1,500 6 20-Dec-12 100 8.75

    BNII01SB Subordinasi I Bank BII Tahun 2011 18-May idAA 4.2 10.75 1,500 8 21-Dec-12 105.5 9.44

    Credit risk

    measurement: Still

    positive as mostly

    corporate revenue was

    driven by domestic

    demand

    Figure 14. Trading in secondary market also improved following rising demand as government

    bond yields continue to fall (left figure). Foreign participant continue to rise (left figure). (Source:

    IDX)

    Figure 15. Top 15 the most active bonds traded in secondary market . (Source: IDX)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    20/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 20 of 40

    coming to the market are also much selected and mostly

    higher than A rated. Weighted average credit score bonds

    rating issuances in 2012 is 3.4 (AA rated) slightly lower than

    2011 i.e. 3.3. According to Pefindo rating agency calculation,

    probability of default 1 year ahead of higher A rated was only

    4.4%. This condition also affects lowering defaulted bonds in

    2012.

    We try to calculate a simple Altman Z-Score model for all non-

    financial companies that listed in bourse. We found that

    shipping marine transportation and wood-based sector still

    gives the lowest score. Meanwhile the highest scores

    reported by consumer and retail sectors. Based on the latest

    transaction data, some corporate bonds names haveattractive valuation in our view are JMPD14JM10, SSMM01B

    and TBLA02.

    A ve ra ge S tD ev

    AAA 101 183 224 108 337 244 223 273 270 169 62

    AA+ 117 207 242 122 356 267 262 301 302 190 66

    AA 135 234 261 138 376 292 308 333 337 214 71

    AA- 157 264 282 156 397 319 362 367 376 241 77

    A+ 182 298 304 177 419 350 425 406 420 272 84A 210 337 328 200 442 383 499 448 469 307 93

    A- 244 381 354 226 467 419 586 495 524 346 105

    BBB+ 282 431 381 256 492 458 689 547 585 390 119

    BBB 327 487 411 289 520 501 809 604 654 441 136

    BBB- 378 550 444 327 549 549 951 667 730 499 158

    1 1- De c 1 2- De c2004-Oct2012

    7-Dec 8-Dec 9-Dec 10-DecRating 4-Dec 5-Dec 6-Dec

    Figure 16. One year rating transition rate (1996-2010). (Source: Pefindo)

    Figure 17. Theoretical risk premium by rating: still higher the average long-term spread . (Source:

    IDX)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    21/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 21 of 40

    Sectors

    Average

    Rating

    The

    highest

    Rating

    The lowest

    Rating

    Number

    bond

    series

    Total

    outstanding

    bondsBanking 4.2 1.0 9.0 96 70,588

    Financial Company 3.4 2.0 9.0 113 48,155

    Infrastructure 2.9 2.0 6.0 29 21,618

    Telecommunication 2.1 1.0 4.0 18 13,350

    Mining Oil & Natural Gas 5.3 3.0 9.0 12 8,427

    Consumer Goods 3.9 2.0 6.0 12 8,340

    Property & Construction 5.9 4.0 8.0 17 6,230

    Automotive Related Industry 4.8 3.0 6.0 13 3,494

    KIK EBA 1.0 1.0 1.0 5 2,206

    Wood Based & Agro Industries 14.5 6.0 18.0 6 1,967

    Advertising, Printing & Media 5.0 5.0 5.0 2 1,250

    Securities Company 7.2 6.0 9.0 5 850

    Shipping & Marine Transport Services 12.5 7.0 18.0 4 842

    Fertilizer 3.0 3.0 3.0 2 791

    Chemicals 5.7 5.0 7.0 3 773

    Retail 4.7 4.0 5.0 6 757

    Poultry 2.0 2.0 2.0 1 300

    Transportasi 8.0 8.0 8.0 1 150

    Computer and Peripheral 8.0 8.0 8.0 1 900%

    2%

    4%

    6%

    8%

    10%

    12%

    (2) (1) - 1 2 3 4 5 6

    Altman Z-Score

    YieldS

    preada

    verRiskfree

    JMPD14JM10SSMM01B

    TBLA02

    Figure 18. Average rating per sector (left figure). Altman z-score and yield spread comparison (rightfigure). (Source: IDX)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    22/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 22 of 40

    Sector

    Company Rating

    Altman Z Score

    TypeFY11

    3Q12

    /2Q12 *

    Chemicals Lautan Luas id A- 1.91 1.79 Manufacture (Public)

    Automotive Services Serasi Autoraya id A+ 1.20 1.36 Non-Manufacture

    Consumer Goods Bentoel AAA (idn) 3.14 2.75 Manufacture (Public)

    Fast Food Indonesia id AA 7.42 8.42 Manufacture (Public)

    Indofood Sukses Makmur id AA+ 3.30 3.08 Manufacture (Public)

    Mayora Indah id AA- 4.20 4.87 Manufacture (Public)

    Fertilizer Pupuk Kaltim id AA 2.77 2.81 Manufacture

    Industrial Selamat Sempurna id AA- 3.61 2.97 Manufacture

    Infrastructure Jasa Marga id AA 2.17 3.72 Non-Manufacture

    Perusahaan Listrik Negara id AA+ 1.03 1.14 Non-Manufacture

    Media Global Mediacom id A+ 4.07 4.58 Non-Manufacture

    Mining Oil & Natural Gas Aneka Gas Industri BBB (idn) 1.24 1.23 Non-Manufacture

    Aneka Tambang id AA 4.78 4.01 Non-Manufacture

    Apexindo Pratama Duta id A 1.22 1.24 Non-Manufacture

    Medco Energi International id AA- 1.59 1.52 Non-Manufacture

    Trading and Logistics AKR Corporindo id AA- 3.10 3.04 Non-Manufacture

    Pastoral & Agricultural Malindo Feedmill id AAA 4.41 4.71 Manufacture (Public)

    Japfa id A 3.98 3.62 Manufacture (Public)

    Plantation BW Plantation id A 2.18 2.08 Manufacture (Public)

    Salim Ivomas Pratama id AA 2.51 2.59 Manufacture (Public)

    Sinar Mas Agro Resources and Tech id AA- 4.97 4.63 Manufacture (Public)

    Tunas Baru Lampung id A 2.40 2.19 Manufacture (Public)

    Property & Construction Adhi Karya id A 1.70 1.65 Non-Manufacture

    Agung Podomoro Land id A 3.41 3.03 Non-Manufacture

    Bakrieland Development id B 0.75 0.46 Non-Manufacture

    Bumi Serpong Damai id A+ 3.47 3.53 Non-Manufacture

    Summarecon Agung id A 2.33 2.32 Non-Manufacture

    Surya Semesta Internusa id A 1.10 1.10 Non-ManufactureWaskita Karya id A- 1.76 1.28 Non-Manufacture

    Telecommunication Indosat id AA+ 1.46 1.27 Non-Manufacture

    Telkom id AAA 3.92 4.15 Non-Manufacture

    Retail Matahari Putra Prima id A+ 1.95 2.05 Non-Manufacture

    Mitra Adiperkasa id AA- 4.10 4.38 Non-Manufacture

    Shipping & Marine

    Transport Arpeni Pratama Ocean Line

    id D

    (disc) (1.13) (2.64) Non-Manufacture

    Bahtera Adimina Samudra n.a. (28.05) (173.14) Non-Manufacture

    Berlian Laju Tanker id D 0.63 0.63 Non-Manufacture

    Transportation Panorama Transportasi id BBB+ 1.00 1.00 Non-Manufacture

    Wood Based & Agro

    Industries Ciliandra Perkasa id A+ 2.24 2.35 Manufacture

    Indah Kiat id D 0.53 0.48 Manufacture

    Lontar Papyrus id D 0.13 0.09 Manufacture

    Pindo Deli id D 0.63 0.65 ManufactureTitan Petrokimia Nusantara A+ (idn) 1.36 1.43 Manufacture (Public)

    Tjiwi Kimia id BBB 1.13 1.12 Manufacture (Public)

    Figure 19. Altman z-score calculation. (Source: Bloomberg, Mandiri Estimate)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    23/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 23 of 40

    Strengthening Domestic Connectivity Towards ASEAN Economic

    Community (AEC) 2015Mamay Sukaesih ([email protected])

    ASEAN as a regional organization has become an important

    factor in the economic order, politics and global security.

    According to IMF data, the GDP share of ASEAN-5 to the global

    GDP was 3.65% with a GDP value of USD 1,827.6 billion in

    2011. In terms of the economy, ASEAN countries have a

    diverse economic profile and main exports. Cooperation

    between ASEAN countries has a strategic role and is able to

    influence a variety of important activities in the order ofinternational relations to be able to spearhead international

    cooperation through trade and capital flows or investments.

    ASEAN connectivity will assist in the facilitation of a single

    market and a more integrated production network and

    encourage trade and investments between the countries in

    the region. A simple description of ASEAN connectivity is as

    shown in Figure 20.

    Figure 20. Interaction Between ASEAN Connectivity and ASEAN Economic Community. (Source:

    Masterplan on ASEAN Connectivity)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    24/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 24 of 40

    Development of Intra-ASEAN Trade

    Target of realized ASEAN connectivity is only 2 years away.

    But, the homework related transportation sector for

    Government and Private has still many. ASEAN connectivity

    can be an opportunity and challenge for Indonesia. Indonesias

    readiness towards ASEAN connectivity is essential that the

    ASEAN connectivity can give positive impacts on the economy.

    Proportion of intra-ASEAN trade to total ASEAN trade has

    increased for 10 years, from 21,8% in 2001 to 25% in 2011.

    Intra-ASEAN export growth was 256%, from USD 86.3 billion in

    2001 to USD 309 billion in 2011. Meanwhile, intra-ASEAN

    import growth was 282%, from USD 71.3 billion in 2001 to

    USD 272.5 billion in 2011.

    Furthermore from 7 ASEAN countries, Singapore, Thailand and

    Malaysia have trade surplus in intra-ASEAN trade for 5 years.

    Singapore has the largest trade surplus in 2011. While

    Indonesia, Cambodia, Philippines and Vietnam have trade

    deficit. In intra-ASEAN trade, share of Singapores export to

    ASEAN countries and share of Singapores import from ASEAN

    countries was the largest in 2011. Meanwhile, share of

    Indonesiae export to ASEAN countries and share of

    Indonesias import from ASEAN countries was 14% and 19%. It

    shows that Indonesia has still become market for ASEAN

    countries. The opportunity of ASEAN community has not been

    used optimal by Indonesia.

    Figure 21. In 10 years, proportion of intra-ASEAN trade to total ASEAN trade has increased, from

    21,8% in 2001 to 25% in 2011. Singapore, Thailand and Malaysia have trade surplus in intra-ASEAN

    trade for 5 years (Source: ASEAN Community in figure 2011 and Intracen)

    Intra-ASEAN Trade Trade Balance intra-ASEAN by Countries

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    25/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 25 of 40

    Indonesias Competitiveness in ASEAN

    The level of competitiveness of Indonesias transport

    infrastructure among ASEAN countries is still relatively low.

    Indonesias infrastructure quality was ranked 92nd of 144

    countries in the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) in

    2012/2013, lower than the Global Competitiveness Report

    (GCR) in 2011/2012 which was ranked 82nd out of 142

    countries. Of eight ASEAN countries included in the CGR in

    2012/2013, the quality of Indonesias infrastructure was

    ranked on the third lowest (before Philippines and Vietnam)

    and was below the global average of infrastructure quality

    rating.

    Furthermore, almost all the transport infrastructure quality

    suffered a downgrade from the previous year and was below

    the global average except the railway infrastructure quality.

    The lowest transport infrastructure quality in the CGR in

    2012/2013 was the port infrastructure, which was ranked

    104th of 144 countries. The rating of the port infrastructure

    quality was at the third lowest of the eight ASEAN countries

    included in the CGR in 2012/2013. Meanwhile, the road

    infrastructure quality and the air transport infrastructure

    quality were respectively ranked 90th and 89th out of 144

    countries in the CGR in 2012/2013. When compared to the

    Share of Export intra-ASEAN Trade by Country, 2011 Share of Import intra-ASEAN Trade by Country, 2011

    Figure 22. In intra-ASEAN trade, share of Singapores export to ASEAN countries and share of

    Singapores import from ASEAN countries was the largest in 2011. (Source: Intracen)

    Others

    6% Others

    6%

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    26/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 26 of 40

    other eight ASEAN countries included in the CGR in

    2012/2013, it was the second lowest ranking for the road

    infrastructure quality and the third lowest ranking for the airtransport infrastructure.

    Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in 2012/2013

    Road Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in 2012/2013 Railway Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in

    2012/2013

    Air Transport Infrastructure Quality Rating in

    CGR in 2012/2013Port Infrastructure Quality Rating in CGR in

    2012/2013

    Figure 23. Competitive level of the transport infrastructure quality of Indonesia was still relatively

    low. In the Global Competitiveness Report (GCR) in 2012/2013, Indonesia was ranked 92nd of 144

    countries. When compared to other ASEAN countries, the position of the Indonesias infrastructure

    ualit was at the third lowest rankin . Source: Global Com etitiveness Re ort

    Competitive Level of Transport Infrastructure Quality of

    Indonesia

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    27/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 27 of 40

    Compared to other ASEAN countries, Indonesia has the

    longest road length in ASEAN. But, Indonesias paved network

    only 65.85% of road length. This percentage was under

    Singapore (100%), Philippines (79.2%), Malaysia (81.1%),

    Thailand (94.5%) and Brunei (92.2%). Based on world bank

    data, cost to export in Indonesia reached USD 644 per

    container in 2012. Indonesia was at 4th the highest of cost to

    export in ASEAN. While, cost to import in Indonesia reached

    USD 660 per container in 2012 or 4th the lowest of cost to

    import in ASEAN.

    Road Length in ASEAN countries, 2011 Percentage of Paved Network to Road Length in ASEAN

    countries, 2011 (%)

    Figure 24. Indonesia has the longest road length in ASEAN but the percentage of paved network to

    road length in Indonesia was 6th largest in ASEAN countries. (Source: ASEAN Statistics)

    Cost to Export (USD per Container) Cost to Import (USD per Container)

    Figure 25. Indonesias Cost to export was at 4th the highest in ASEAN. While Indonesias cost

    import was at 4th the lowest in ASEAN. (Source: World Development Indicators)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    28/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    29/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    30/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 30 of 40

    To improve domestic connectivity, the Government has issued

    a Masterplan for the Acceleration and Expansion of

    Indonesias Economic Development (MP3EI) 2011-2025 in

    May 2011. Financing of MP3EI for transportation sector was

    Proportion of Transport Sector to Nominal GDP

    (%)

    2012*: cumulative of quarter I to quarter III

    Proportion of Transport Sub-sector to Nominal GDP,

    2012* (%)

    Figure 27. Transport sectors contribution to GDP in 2012* was 3.43%, lower than 2007. Road

    transport had the greatest contribution. (Source: BPS)

    Growth of Transport Sector and National GDP

    (%yoy)

    2012*: cumulative of quarter I to quarter III

    Growth of Transport Sector GDP, (% yoy)

    Figure 28. Growth in the transport sector since 2009 was above the national growth despite the

    decline in 2012*. This decrease was because the growth in the air transports and railway transports

    decreased significantly. Even since 2011, the growth of railway transports was negative. (Source:

    BPS

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    31/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 31 of 40

    mainly for road infrastructure. The sources of financing of

    MP3EI were from Government, SOE, and Private. However,

    the realization of MP3EI is felt not optimal.

    The realized investment of MP3EI in 2012 reached IDR 623.91

    trillion, IDR 243 billion of which is allocated for road

    infrastructure, transports and water resources and energy.

    Meanwhile, the indication of MP3EI investment needed in

    2014 reached IDR 4,012 trillion. In 2013, the Government planto build twelve of new airport. For port infrastructure, the

    Government is going to build ninety one of port and

    implement Pendulum Nusantara concept. The Government

    also is going to build railway to Soekarno Hatta Airport.

    Conclusion

    The weak competitiveness of Indonesia compared to other

    ASEAN countries is a challenge to be overcome before the

    application of the ASEAN connectivity. Indonesia with the

    largest population in ASEAN, which amounted to 39.1% of the

    total population of ASEAN in 2010, will only be a market forother ASEAN countries if there is no improvement in the

    domestic connectivity. Accelerated implementation of the

    domestic connectivity concept is very important since the

    implementation of the ASEAN connectivity is only 2 years

    away.

    MP3EI: Indication of Infrastructure Investment (IDR Tn)

    Figure 29. Financing of MP3EI for transportation sector was mainly for road infrastructure.

    (Source: KP3EI)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    32/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 32 of 40

    Commodities Insight: Natural Rubber

    M. Ajie Maulendra ([email protected])

    Global natural rubber consumption in 2013 is estimated at

    11.6 million tons or 4% growth (yoy). Growth in rubber

    consumption in 2013 is higher than in 2012 by 2.4% (yoy).

    Consumption growth is still coming from the auto sector

    growth, especially in China and Asia regions. Meanwhile,

    demand from the European Union this year is expected to fall,

    because of unsolved recession. As an illustration, the EU

    demand for natural rubber in the first half of 2012 fell by 15%

    (yoy). A bright outlook of global demand for natural rubber isalso seen in the positive expectations of auto sales in the

    United States (U.S.). In Q3 of 2012 and Q4 of 2012, U.S. auto

    sales grew by 13.8% (yoy) and 10% (yoy), and the positive

    trend is expected to continue in 2013 in line with the

    agreement of the U.S. government in the management of

    fiscal policy to prevent the United States from the threat of

    recession. U.S. auto sales this year is expected to reach 15

    million units, up 4.2% from 14.4 million units from the last

    year.

    Natural rubber consumption growth in Asia is expected to

    record positive trend in 2013. As it is supported by the Chinese

    governments infrastructure spending plan announced in

    September 2012, Chinas natural rubber consumption in 2013

    has been forecasted to grow by 5.5% (yoy). These China

    infrastructure projects is believed can boost the production of

    automotive and transportation sectors. Automobile

    purchasing in India also supports Indias rubber demand,

    which is expected to grow by 4% (yoy) in 2013. Meanwhile,

    Japan is expected to grow only 2% (yoy), given its economic

    recovery from the disaster of 2011 is still running slow. As

    economic recession is still haunting EU, rubber consumption in

    EU in 2013 is expected to fall -0.1% (yoy). On the

    otherside,U.S. rubber consumption, which is mostly absorbed

    to automotive sector, is forecasted to grow by 4% (yoy) in

    2013.

    Thailand, Indonesia and Malaysia are known as the

    International Tripartite Rubber Council (ITRC) because these

    three countries become the largest producers of natural

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    33/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 33 of 40

    rubber. Thailand became the largest producer of natural

    rubber with 3.5 million tons rubber production in 2012, while

    Indonesia took in second place with 3 million tons rubberproduction in the same period, followed by Malaysia with

    natural rubber production of 946 thousand tons in the same

    period.

    The worlds natural rubber production in 2013 is forecasted to

    grow 4% (yoy) or reach 11.7 million tons. Global rubber

    production this year is estimated to be better than last year.

    Several assumptions support the reason are favorable climate

    condition, restrictions on rubber exports by the three

    countries ended in March 2013 will improve rubber price and

    provide incentive to farmers in doing tapping. The rubberprice in 2013 (on average) is expected to increase compared

    to 2012. Data from the Economist Intelligent Unit (EIU) shows

    that the average price of rubber in 2013 is estimated at 3.9

    USD/kg, up by 1.4% yoy from 3.8 USD/kg in 2012. Bullish

    factors to the rubber price are also caused by the global

    rubber stocks in 2013, which are expected to be tighter than

    the previous year. This is caused by the impact of export

    restrictions by the three countries, which have been

    implementing from October 2012 and will have been finished

    by March 2013. If rubber price are still under pressure, ITRC

    will extend its policy.

    Countries of members of rubber manufacturers association or

    the International Tripartite Rubber Council (ITRC), Indonesia,

    Thailand and Malaysia, agreed to cut exports of 300,000 tons

    natural rubber from the three countries this year. This was

    motivated by the deteriorating rubber price during the first 8

    months of 2012 which reach USD 2.5/kg (in August), or down

    by 28% (ytd) from the beginning of 2012 at USD 3.2/kg.

    Indonesia gets a rubber export quota reduction of 117 000

    tons, Thailand of 140,000 tons and Malaysia of 43,000 tons.

    GAPKINDO stated that 117 000 tons reduction in Indonesias

    rubber exports was divided into two periods. First, October to

    December 2012 period, rubber export cut by 60% or 70,200

    tons. Secondly, January to March 2013 rubber export will be

    cut by 40% or 46,000 tons. Once the restriction plan was

    announced on August 16, 2012, the rubber price (the Daily

    Composite Price in the three countries) immediately jumped

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    34/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 34 of 40

    from USD 2.54 per kilogram to around USD 2.9 per kilogram in

    early December 2012. Currently, the rubber price (rubber

    Tokyo market) was at the level of USD 3.3/kg. ITRC will askVietnam to join ITRC to maintain the rubber price stability. In

    fact, statistically, Vietnam rubber production also has a fairly

    high portion in Southeast Asia (in 2012 it exceeded 860

    thousand tons). Four countries, namely Indonesia, Thailand,

    Malaysia and Vietnam, will control 74 percent of the world

    market.

    The Rubber Association of Indonesia (Gabungan Perusahaan

    Karet Indonesia Gapkindo) set rubber export allocation for

    each region in Indonesia. South Sumatra will be the largest

    rubber exporter followed by North Sumatra, Jambi and WestKalimantan. Started on October 1, 2012, during the last three

    months of 2012, South Sumatra had rubber export allocation

    of 206,779 tons per month. Meanwhile, North Sumatra had

    export allocation of 51,037 tons per month, and Jambi of

    30,627 tons per month.

    3,790

    1005777

    2,390

    1,134

    264

    1,107

    616

    94

    China

    India

    Japan

    Other

    Asia

    EU O

    ther

    Europe

    North

    America

    Latin

    America

    Africa

    0.00

    2.00

    4.00

    6.00

    8.00

    10.00

    12.00

    14.00

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F

    -15.0%

    -10.0%

    -5.0%

    0.0%

    5.0%

    10.0%

    15.0%

    20.0%

    Konsumsi Karet Alam Global Pertumbuhan KonsumsiGlobal Consumption of

    Natural RubberProduction Growth

    Figure 30. Worlds consumption of natural rubber (left figure). Natural rubber demand in several

    contries (right figure). (Source: EIU, IRSG)

    Worlds Consumption of Natural Rubber

    (Million Ton)Natural rubber demand in Several Countries

    (000 tons)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    35/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 35 of 40

    Thailand, 31.2%

    Others, 7.5%

    Vietnam, 7.7%

    India, 8.2%

    Malaysia, 8.4% Indonesia,

    26.8%

    Cte d'Ivoire,

    2.2%

    Brazil, 1.2%

    China, 6.8%

    Country 2011 2012 Growth

    United States 12,733,015 14,440,574 13.4%

    China 18,533,406 17,493,506 -5.6%

    India 2,512,441 2,563,196 2.0%

    Japan 4,210,227 5,031,230 19.5%

    Indonesia 894,164 1,026,768 14.8%

    Europe 16,850,926 15,049,083 -10.7%

    Automotive Sales in Several Countries

    (unit)

    Shares of Global Natural Rubber Production,

    2012

    Figure 31. Automotive sales in several countries (left figure). Shares of global natural rubber

    production (right figure). (Source: EIU, IRSG)

    US Japan China Singapore South Korea

    3.

    4 3.

    8

    3.

    6

    4.

    6

    6

    5.

    6

    4.

    9

    4 4.

    2

    3.

    9

    3.

    7

    3.

    7

    3.

    78

    3.

    9

    3.

    94

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Q110

    Q210

    Q310

    Q410

    Q111

    Q211

    Q311

    Q411

    Q112

    Q212

    Q312

    Q412

    Q113

    Q213

    Q313

    Q413

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    Rubber Price (lhs) WTI Price (rhs)

    Worlds Natural Rubber Prices

    (USD / kg)Market Shares of Indonesias Natural Rubber

    Exports in Some Countries of Major Destination

    Figure 32. Worlds natural rubber (left figure). Market shares of Indonesias natural rubber exports

    in some countries of major destination (right figure). (Source: EIU)

    2.76 2.75

    2.4

    2.7

    3 3.04

    2.77

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013F

    Figure 33. Indonesias Natural Rubber Production. (Source: Ministry of Agriculture)

    Indonesias Natural Rubber Production

    (mn ton)

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    36/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 36 of 40

    mandiri leading economic index (LEI)January2013

    Mandiri Leading Economic Index (MLEI) fluctuated in the

    range of 99.2 to 100.7 during the period of January to

    November 2012. The index has decreased to 100.6 (-

    0.1%MoM) in November 2012, from an increased 0.4%MoM

    in October 2012. From several constituent indicators of MLEI

    such as JCI index, export index, exchange rate index and the

    volume of savings index showed a decline in November 2012.

    It is predicted that the domestic economy will still experiencea relatively flat growth at current level to 2Q13.

    From recent data, Indonesia's trade deficit in November 2012

    narrowed from the previous month's record high, but exports

    remain weak in line with the uncertainty in global economy.

    The trade deficit narrowed to USD 480 million from a record

    high USD 1.54 billion in October 2012. In November 2012,

    imports rose grew 9.92 % (YoY), slower than October's 10.8%

    (YoY) increase. Exports in November 2012 were down 4.6%

    (YoY) or less than the previous month's 7.61% (YoY) drop.

    Trade deficits in the G20 economy also have put pressure onthe rupiah which weakened around 6,0% against US Dollar in

    2012. Indonesia is bracing for stagnant exports due to weak

    overseas demand attributed to the sluggish recovery of the

    global economy.

    Indonesia's GDP (gross domestic product) grew 6.2%YoY in

    3Q12 (was above 6,0% for the eighth straight quarter) as

    domestic consumption and investment remained strong

    despite a deteriorating global economy. Although Indonesia's

    economy has so far remained resilient in the face of a global

    slowdown, The Government said that Indonesias economymight only expand by about 6.6% this year, versus the initial

    forecast of 6.8% as stated in the 2013 State Budget Law and

    Rupiah might trade as low as 9,700 per US Dollar in 2013, is

    weaker than that stipulated in the 2013 state budget, which

    requires the currency to trade at an average of 9,300 to the

    greenback.

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    37/40

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    38/40

    Oce of Chief EconomistPage 38 of 40

    MACRO ECONOMIC INDICATORS AND FORECAST 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012F 2013F 2014F

    National Account

    Real GDP (% yoy) 6.3 6.0 4.6 6.2 6.5 6.3 6.3 6.6Domestic Demand (% yoy) 6.0 7.5 5.4 5.3 5.7 6.6 6.7 7.5

    Real Consumption: Private (% yoy) 5.0 5.3 4.9 4.7 4.7 5.3 5.3 5.5

    Real Consumption: Government (% yoy) 3.9 10.4 15.7 0.3 3.2 3.0 2.9 5.8

    Real Gross Fixed Capital Formation (% yoy) 9.3 11.9 3.3 8.5 8.8 10.8 11.1 11.9

    Real Exports (% yoy) 8.5 9.5 (9.7) 15.3 13.6 1.0 4.6 7.0

    Real Imports (% yoy) 9.1 10.0 (15.0) 17.3 13.3 4.8 6.5 8.5

    GDP (IDR tn) - nominal 3,951 4,949 5,606 6,436 7,427 8,392 9,579 10,893

    GDP (USD bn) - nominal 432 511 539 708 846 893 993 1,125

    GDP per capita (USD) - nominal 1,916 2,234 2,328 2,981 3,572 3,723 4,090 4,579

    External Sector

    Exports (%yoy,USD) - Merchandise 14.0 18.3 (14.3) 32.1 27.0 (5.1) 7.0 9.0

    Imports (%yoy,USD) - Merchandise 15.4 36.9 (24.0) 43.7 30.3 8.5 9.0 9.0

    Trade Balance (USD bn) 32.8 22.9 30.9 30.6 34.8 10.6 7.7 8.4

    Current Account (% of GDP) 2.4 0.0 2.0 0.7 0.2 (2.4) (2.3) (1.8)

    Current Account (USD bn) 10.5 0.1 10.6 5.1 1.7 (21.7) (23.3) (20.3)

    External Debt (% of GDP) 32.7 30.4 32.1 28.6 26.6 27.8 27.5 26.7

    International Reserves (USD bn) 56.9 50.0 66.1 96.2 110 111 113 118

    Import cover (months) 8.0 5.1 8.9 9.1 8.0 7.4 6.9 6.6

    IDR/USD (period average) 9,139 9,692 10,408 9,087 8,776 9,396 9,646 9,681

    IDR/USD (year end) 9,235 11,028 9,470 8,963 9,000 9,670 9,606 9,677

    Other

    BI rate (% period average) 8.4 8.8 6.9 6.5 6.6 5.8 5.8 5.8

    BI rate (% year end) 8.0 9.3 6.5 6.5 6.0 5.8 5.8 5.8

    Headline Inflation (% yoy, period average) 6.4 10.3 4.3 5.3 5.1 4.3 5.4 4.9

    Headline Inflation (% yoy, year end) 6.4 11.1 2.8 7.0 3.8 4.5 5.4 4.7

    Fiscal Balance (% of GDP) (1.3) (0.1) (1.6) (0.6) (1.5) (1.6) (1.5) (1.5)

    S&P's Rating - FCY BB- BB- BB- BB BB+ BB+ BB+ BB+

    S&P's Rating - LCY BB+ BB+ BB+ BB+ BBB- BBB- BBB- BBB-

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    39/40

    Oce of Chief Economist Page 39 of 40

    Disclaimer: This material is for information only, and we are not soliciting any action based upon it. This report is not to beconstrued as an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy any security in any jurisdiction where such an offer orsolicitation would be illegal. The information herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but we do notwarrant that it is accurate or complete, and it should not be relied upon as such. Opinion expressed is our current opinion as ofthe date appearing on this material only, and subject to change without notice. It is intended for the use by recipient only andmay not be reproduced or copied/photocopied or duplicated or made available in any form, by any means, or redistributed toothers without written permission of PT Bank Mandiri Tbk. Additional information is available upon request. For furtherinformation please contact: Office of Chief Economist, Ph. (021) 524 5516/5272 or Facs. (021) 521 0430.

    INDONESIA CURRENT DATA

    2013

    Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

    Exchange Rate

    End of Period IDR/USD 9393 10900 9390 8978 9069 8990 9023 9146 9189 9400 9433 9467 9581 9589 9608 9594 9658

    Average IDR/USD 9354 1167 9462 9021 9059 9071 9020 9251 9175 9320 9442 9451 9505 9565 9599 9620 9634

    Monetary Sector

    Base money M0, eop IDRtn 379.58 344.69 402.12 518.45 613.49 594.08 578.96 586.03 596.59 604.98 627.36 634.99 657.96 638.87 648.11 647.98 7 04.84

    Narrow money M1 IDRtn 450.06 456.79 515.82 605.38 733.99 696.32 683.25 714.25 720.92 749.45 779.41 771.79 772.42 795.51 774.98 801.40

    Broa d Money M2 IDRtn 1,649.66 1,883.85 2,141.38 2,469.40 2,877.22 285.49 284.97 291.19 292.72 299.20 305.03 305.48 308.90 312.55 316.77 320.51

    Outstanding Loan IDRtn 995.11 1,313.87 1,446.81 1,783.60 2,223.69 218.34 222.77 229.15 234.34 241.17 248.00 249.87 253.92 258.42 261.50 266.10

    O ut st an di ng D ep os it I DR tn 1 ,4 59 .4 4 1, 67 3. 82 1 ,9 14 .1 1 2 ,2 08 .7 2 2 ,5 96 .3 3 2 ,5 40 .2 4 2 ,5 67 .3 6 2 ,6 24 .5 1 2 ,6 36 .0 4 2 ,6 97 .1 0 2 , 73 5. 35 2 ,7 38 ,9 26 .0 9 2 ,7 61 ,2 30 2 ,7 99 ,0 56 2 ,8 34 ,5 44 2 ,8 77 ,1 01

    Lending rate (working capital) % p.a 13.00 15.22 13.69 12.83 12.16 12.09 12.02 12.01 11.86 11.78 11.79 11.78 11.73 11.70 11.68 11.61

    3-month deposit rate, eop % p.a 7.42 11.97 6.85 7.06 6.81 6.68 6.52 6.31 6.00 5.89 5.76 5.67 5.61 5.69 5.66 5.81

    Overnight rate, eop % p.a 4.50 9.40 6.24 5.72 4.55 4.02 3.75 3.76 3.76 3.93 4.05 4.06 4.09 4.10 4.18 4.15 4.19

    Prices

    Headline CPI (2007=100) Index 155.5 113.86 117.03 1 25.17 129.91 130.9 130.96 131.05 131.32 131.41 132.23 133.16 134.43 134.45 134.67 134.76 135.49

    Year on year inflation rate % 6.59 11.06 2.78 6.96 3.79 3.65 3.56 3.97 4.50 4.45 4.53 4.56 4.58 4.31 4.61 4.32 4.30

    Month on month inflation rate % 1.1 -0.04 0.33 0.92 0.57 0.76 0.05 0.07 0.21 0.07 0.62 0.70 0.95 0.01 0.16 0.07 0.54

    Year to date inflation rate % N/A 11.06 2.78 6.96 3.79 0.76 0.81 0.88 1.09 1.15 1.79 2.50 3.48 3.49 3.66 3.73 4.30

    Wholesale Price Index (2000=100) Index 217 238.0 167.35 1 77.87 185.76 187.11 187.77 188.54 189.45 189.72 190.22 190.76 191.81 192.11 192.19 192.00 192.06

    Trade

    Export USDbn 10.86 8.69 13.35 1 6.83 17.20 15.49 15.69 17.25 16.17 16.82 15.44 16.10 14.05 15.89 15.32 16.44

    Oil USDbn 2.51 1.24 2.50 3.26 3.60 2.97 3.35 3.48 3.56 3.72 2.89 2.91 2.78 2.77 2.65 2.70

    Non oil USDbn 8.36 7.45 10.85 13.57 13.60 12.51 12.33 13.76 12.61 13.11 12.55 13.17 11.26 13.12 12.67 13.73

    Import USDbn 6.81 6.29 10.33 13.15 16.34 14.55 14.86 16.32 16.93 17.03 16.72 16.35 13.81 15.34 17.21 16.92

    Oil USDbn 2.39 0.98 2.10 2.64 3.63 2.98 3.49 4.00 4.12 3.44 3.35 2.76 3.31 3.44 3.83 4.06

    Non oil USDbn 4.42 5.31 8.22 1 0.50 12.71 11.53 11.37 12.31 12.81 13.60 13.37 13.60 10.55 11.90 13.38 12.85

    Trade Balance USDbn 4.06 2.40 3.02 3.68 0.86 0.94 0.83 0.93 (0.76) (0.21) (1.28) (0.25) 0.24 0.55 -1.89 -0.48

    Output

    G DP ( cu rren t p rice ) I DR tn 1034.86 1274.29 1450.82 1670.52 1921.56 1972.35 2050.09 212.28

    GDP (constant price at 2000) IDRtn 493.37 518.94 547.54 585.10 623.96 632.77 650.58 671.47

    Real Growth % YoY 5.88 5.20 5.43 6.89 6.49 6.32 6.37 6.17

    Capital Market

    JCI Index, eop Index 2 74 5. 83 1 35 5.4 1 25 34 .3 6 3 70 3. 51 38 21. 99 39 41 .6 9 3 98 5.2 1 4 12 1.5 5 4 18 0. 73 3 832 .82 3 955 .57 4 142 .3 3 4 06 0. 33 4 262 .5 6 4,350.29 4,276.14 4,316.68

    Volume, avg shares mn 3 15 5. 65 1 74 3.2 5 34 22 .1 0 3 96 5. 38 34 96. 38 40 45 .4 9 3 48 2.6 0 2 75 1.1 6 4 40 7. 93 3 092 .99 2 936 .69 2 529 .6 6 2 62 4. 87 3 796 .5 5 3,916.49 5,289.28 3,059.99

    Value, avg IDRbn 4 34 0. 55 1 45 4.6 1 23 32 .4 2 3 95 9. 30 26 84. 29 32 69 .5 0 4 16 1.3 9 3 77 3.3 0 4 10 3. 34 3 967 .34 3 216 .60 3 347 .2 3 3 06 8. 91 3 518 .6 7 3,623.31 6,734.35 3,868.71

    Consumer Confidence Index 99.10 90.60 108.70 109.30 116.60 119.20 111.70 107.30 102.50 109.00 114.40 113.50 115.70 117.70 119.50 120.10 1 16.40

    2011Indicators Unit 20102012

    2007 2008 2009

  • 7/29/2019 Nbf p 17264811

    40/40