navigating parenteral nutrition: updates on the …...• limit copper contamination to
TRANSCRIPT
NAVIGATING PARENTERAL
NUTRITION:
UPDATES ON THE LATEST
Amy Sacapano, MS RD CSPCC CNSC
Bone Marrow Transplant RD, Clinical Dietitian III
Children’s Hospital Los Angeles
Disclosures
• None to declare
1
Learning Objectives
1. View available electronic PN resources
2. Review PN components - Concerns for deficiencies
- How to deal with shortages
3. Discuss differences in Injectable Lipid
Emulsions (ILE)
4. Discuss gut microbiome changes
associated with PN
2
PROFESSIONAL RESOURCES
AT YOUR FINGERTIPS
4
5
A.S.P.E.N. Clinical App
https://apps.apple.com/us/app/a-s-p-e-n-clinical-app/id1081990652 Accessed July 2019
6
7
Pediatric RD app
https://www.med.umich.edu/pfans/services/umhspediatricapp.html Accessed July 2019
8
Pediatric RD app
https://www.med.umich.edu/pfans/services/umhspediatricapp.html Accessed July 2019
ASPEN Website: nutritioncare.org
9
10 http://www.nutritioncare.org/PNResources/ Accessed July 2019
ASPEN Website: nutritioncare.org
11
SmartPN Education Resources
12 http://www.nutritioncare.org/smartpn/ Accessed July 2019
PN Nutrition Care Pathway
13 https://www.nutritioncare.org/SmartPN_Pathway.aspx Accessed July 2019
14
PN Care Pathway
https://www.nutritioncare.org/SmartPN_Pathway.aspx Accessed July 2019
Disease States
15
Neonate Pediatrics Adolescents/Adults
In the critical care
setting regardless of
diagnosis
When EN is unable
to meet energy
expenditure and
growth
When intestinal
tract is not
functional
When intestinal
tract cannot be
accessed
When nutrient
needs for growth
are greater than
what can be
provided by oral
intake or EN
support alone
• Do not use PN
based solely on
medical diagnosis
or disease state
Worthington, P. et al “When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?” JPEN Vol 41 No 3 March 2017. pp 324-377. DOI:
10.1177/0148607117695251
When is PN Preferred?
Neonate and Pediatrics Adolescents/Adults
When EN is not feasible or
insufficient to meet total nutrient
needs
When EN is contraindicated or
patient unable to tolerate
adequate EN or lacks sufficient
bowel function to maintain or
restore nutrition status for
patient who are
Malnourished
At risk for malnutrition
16
Worthington, P. et al “When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?” JPEN Vol 41 No 3 March 2017. pp 324-377. DOI:
10.1177/0148607117695251
When is EN not feasible?
Neonate and Pediatrics Adolescents/Adults
A clear contraindication to EN,
such as intestinal injury and
perforation
Assess intestinal function and
perfusion, as well as overall
hemodynamic stability
Evaluate clinical factors derived
from history, physical examination
and diagnostic evaluations
17
Worthington, P. et al “When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?” JPEN Vol 41 No 3 March 2017. pp 324-377. DOI:
10.1177/0148607117695251
Timing of PN
Neonate Pediatrics Adolescents/Adults
Very Low Birth Weight
(VLBW) infant,
birthweight <1500g
Begin PN promptly after
birth
More mature preterm
infants or critically ill
term neonates
Use clinical judgement
assessing:
- hemodynamic
stability
- intestinal function
- intestinal perfusion
- Nutritional status
When evident that patient
will not tolerate full oral or
EN intake for an extended
period
Infants:
Within 1-3 days
Older children:
4-5 days
For patients
Well-nourished and stable
unable to receive 50% or
more of estimated
requirements PO or by EN
After 7 days
Nutritionally-at-risk and
unlikely to achieve
desired oral or EN intake
Within 3-5 days
Baseline moderate or
severe malnutrition when
oral or EN intake is not
possible or sufficient
As soon as feasible
Severe metabolic
instability
Delay until condition
has improved 18
Worthington, P. et al “When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?” JPEN Vol 41 No
3 March 2017. pp 324-377. DOI: 10.1177/0148607117695251
Elements of Appropriate PN Use
• Identify clinical indication of PN, including manifestations of acute and
chronic intestinal failure
• Recognize situations in which PN is not likely to be of benefit
• Initiate PN based on gastrointestinal function, nutrition status, and clinical
status
• Select the vascular access device best suited to the therapy planned
• Implement measures to promote safety and reduce adverse outcomes
• Evaluate response to therapy
• Adjust in the therapeutic plan based on ongoing monitoring
• Assess continued need for PN
• Transition promptly to oral or enteral nutrition as feasible
• Collaborate across disciplines and departmental boundaries
19
ASPEN DOSING GUIDE
20
Appropriate Dosing for PN
21 http://www.nutritioncare.org/PNResources/ Accessed July 2019
ASPEN Dosing Guide
22
ASPEN Recommendations 2012 vs Available MTE
Trace
Element
MULTI-TE PRODUCTS AVAILABLE IN U.S.
(Manufacturer Dosing Recommendations)
ASPEN
Recommendations
TEMPORARY
U.S.
IMPORTATION
Multitrace4
Neonatal®
(per 1 mL)
Multitrace-4
Pediatric®
(per1 mL)
Trace Elements
Injection 4, USP-
Pediatric ®
(per 1 mL)
Peditrace®
(per 1 mL
Zinc 1.5 mg
(0.1 mg/kg/d,
0.3 mg/kg/d
premature infants
<3 kg)
1 mg
(0.1 mg/kg/d)
0.5 mg
(0.1 mg/kg/d)
No changes (0.3 mg/
kg/d premature infants
<3 kg and 0.1 mg/kg/d
for infants/children >3
kg)
0.25 mg (0.25
mg/kg/d ≤15 kg
3.75 mg/d >15
kg)
Copper 0.1 mg
(0.02 mg/kg/d)
0.1 mg
(0.02 mg/kg/d)
0.1 mg
(0.02 mg/kg/d)
0.02 mg/kg/d 0.02 mg (0.02
mg/kg/d ≤15 kg
0.3 mg/d >15 kg)
Manganese 25 mcg
(2–10 mcg/kg/d)
25 mcg
(2–10 mcg/kg/d)
25 mcg
(2–10 mcg/kg/d)
Decrease to 1 mcg/
kg/d in neonates with
maximal daily dose in
pediatrics to 55 mcg/
day
1 mcg (1
mcg/kg/d ≤15 kg
15 mcg/d >15 kg)
Chromium
(mcg)
0.85 mcg
(0.14–0.20
mcg/kg/d)
1 mcg
(0.14–0.20
mcg/kg/d)
1 mcg
(0.14–0.20
mcg/kg/d)
Reduce dose to
recommended values and
have product available
without Cr for patients
at increased risk of
toxicity
0 mcg
23
Recommended Chromium Changes
24
Age Male Female
0–6 months 0.0006 mcg/kg/day
7–12 months 0.012 mcg/kg/day
1–3 years 0.22 mcg/day
4–8 years 0.30 mcg/day
9–13 years 0.5 mcg/day 0.42 mcg/day
14–18 years 0.7 mcg/day 0.48 mcg/day
A.S.P.E.N., American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Adapted from Moukarzel A, Chromium in parenteral
nutrition: too little or too much? Gastroenterology, 2009;137(5)(suppl):S18–S28, with permission from Elsevier.
ASPEN Recommendations vs. Available MTE
Trace
Element
MULTI-TE PRODUCTS AVAILABLE IN U.S.
(Manufacturer Dosing Recommendations)
ASPEN
Recommendations
TEMPORARY U.S.
IMPORTATION
Multitrace4
Neonatal®
(per 1 mL)
Multitrace-4
Pediatric®
(per1 mL)
Trace Elements
Injection 4,
USP-Pediatric ®
(per 1 mL)
Peditrace®
(per 1 mL)
Selenium 0 mcg 0 mcg 0 mcg Add with dose of 2 mcg/
kg/d
2 mcg (2 mcg/kg/d
≤15 kg
Iron -- -- -- Routine supplementation
of PN could be beneficial, but
more research is needed
especially with lipid-containing
PN
--
Molybdenum -- -- -- Insufficient data to recommend
routine administration
--
Iodide -- -- -- Routine supplementation
of PN could be beneficial, but
more research is needed
1 mcg
(1 mcg/kg/d ≤15 kg
15 mcg/d >15 kg)
Fluoride -- -- -- Routine supplementation
of PN could be
beneficial, but more
research is needed
57 mcg
(57 mcg/kg/d ≤15
kg
855 mcg/d >15
kg)
25
Vanek, V. W. et al. “A Call to Action to bring Safer Parenteral Micronutrient Products to the U.S. Market” Nutrition in
Clinical Practice. Vol. 30 No. 4. August 2015. pp 559-569. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615589992
ESPGHAN/ESPEN Recommendations
Iodine R 7.12 Iodine should be provided with PN at a daily dose of 1-10 g/kg
daily in preterms and at least 1 g/kg/day in infants and
children. (LoE 4, RG 0, strong recommendation, strong consensus)
R 7.13 Patients on long-term PN should be regularly monitored for
iodine status by measuring at least thyroid hormone concentrations
(LoE 4, RG 0, conditional recommendation, strong consensus)
Molybdenum R 7.19 Molybdenum should be provided in long term PN at a dose of
1 g/kg per day in LBW infants and 0.25 mg/kg per day (up to a
maximum of 5.0 g/day) in infants and children. (LoE 4, RG 0,
conditional recommendation, strong consensus)
26
ASPEN Recommendations 2012 Position Paper
Parenteral MVI products: Meets requirement for most PN patients.
Separate vitamin D required for patient who on standard therapy continue to be vitamin D depleted and are unresponsive to oral vitamin D supplements.
Pediatric/Neonatal Multi-trace Element (TE) products:
• Decrease manganese to 1 mcg/kg/d in neonates
• Product with no chromium
• Add selenium 2 mcg/kg/d
Parenteral carnitine products: • No change in the product but should provide 2-5
mg/kg/d to all neonates
27
ASPEN Recommendations 2012 Position Paper
Parenteral choline product: • None currently available; requires commercial development
with doses shown below Pediatric/Neonatal:
• 0-6 mo: 125 mg/d
• 7-12 mo: 150 mg/d
• 1-3 y: 200 mg/d
• 4-8 y: 250 mg/d
• 9-13 y: 375 mg/d
• >13 y 550 mg/d
Adults:
• 550 mg/d
TE contamination in all PN components combined: • Limit manganese contamination to <40 mcg/d in final PN
volume
• Limit copper contamination to <0.1 mg/d in final PN volume
28
ASPEN’s Future Research Recs
In Order of Priority
1. Parenteral chromium requirements in adult, pediatric, and neonatal PN patients
2. Research and development of appropriate monitoring strategies for trace element (TE) and vitamin deficiency and toxicity in PN patients
3. Studies on TE contamination of PN products need to be updated, particularly manganese and chromium contamination of neonatal and pediatric formulas
4. Feasibility of adding parenteral iron to PN formulas to include fat emulsion stability and other potential incompatibilities
5. Benefits of carnitine supplements of PN in adult and pediatric patients
6. Benefits of fluoride supplementation of PN in all age groups
7. Benefit of iodide supplementation of PN in all age groups
29
Vanek, V.W., et al. “A Call to Action to Bring Safer Parenteral Micronutrient Products to the U.S. Market”
Nutrition in clinical Practice. Vol 30 No 4. August 2015. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615589992
Injectable Lipid Emulsions
30
http://www.nutritioncare.org/PNResources/ Accessed July 2019
31
Injectable Lipid Emulsions
Comparison of Available ILE Component Intralipid Omegaven SMOFlipid
Soybean oil% 100 30
MCT % 30
Olive Oil % 25
Fish Oil % 100 15
Glycerol, g/100 mL 2.25 2.5 2.5
Egg phospholipid g/100 mL 1.2 1.2 1.2
Phytosterols, mg/L 439 + 5.7 3.66 207
Vitamin E, mg/100 mL 3.8 15-30 16-23
LA,% 50 4.4 21.4
ALA, % 9 1.8 2.5
EPA % 0 19.2 3
DHA, % 0 12.1 2
ARA, % 0 1-4 0.15-0.6
32
ALA, α-linolenic acid; ARA, arachidonic acid; EPA, eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, docosahexaenoic acid; LA, linoleic acid;
Anez-Bustillos, L. et al. “Intravenous Fat Emulsion Formulations for the Adult and Pediatric Patient: Understanding the
Differences” Nutrition in Clinical Practice. Vol. 31 No 5 October 2016 pp 596-609. DOI: 10.1177/0884533616662996
Omegaven
33
https://omegavenusa.com/home/ Accessed July 2019
https://omegavenusa.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/fullpi.pdf Accessed July 2019
FDA approved for pediatrics July 2018
SMOFlipid
34
https://smoflipid.com/characteristics-of-smoflipid/smoflipid-composition/ Accessed July 2019
Awaiting FDA approval for pediatrics
ILE Generation 1
35
Generation 1 (Soybean Oil based) Pros:
– Robust amount of EFA content allows smaller volume to prevent EFAD. To prevent EFAD: LA > 1% of total calories; α-linolenic acid requirements are even less at 0.2-0.5% of total calories
Cons:
– High ratio of n-6 to n-3 PUFA may give rise to pro-inflammatory eicosanoids
– Leads to reduced clearance of reticuloendothelial system (RES), a key player in the phagocytosis of microorganisms, tissue debris, and particulate matter.
– Increased LDL and triglyceride levels, decrease in HDL levels
– May contribute to intestinal failure associated liver disease (IFALD)
Mundi, M.S. et al. “Parenteral Nutrition – Lipids Emulsions and Potential Complications” Nutrition Issues in
Gastroenterology, Series #166. Practical Gastroenterolgy, August 2017
ILE Generation 4
Generation 4 (Fish-Oil Containing)
Pros:
– Improvement or reversal of IFALD
– Higher -tocopherol (antioxidant from Vitamin E family)
– Less pro-inflammatory profile
Cons:
– Concern for development of EFAD given the lower ratio of n-6 PUFAs
.
36
What about EFAD?
Essential Fatty Acid Deficiency
• Biochemical marker – a reduction of ARA 9a tretraenoic -6 fatty acid, resulting in the increase of trienoic nonessential -9 Mead acid
Holman index (triene:tetraene ratio) at >0.2 is considered biochemical EFAD - May appear as early as 7-10 days of EFAs restriction
S/S are detected at >0.4 Presents with growth retardation, reproductive failure, eczematous dermatitis and alopecia
An LA intake of 2%–4% of total energy, and an ALA intake of 0.25%–0.5% of total energy, are recommended to prevent EFAD.
ILE with Lower levels of LA and ALA raised concerns about their ability to prevent EFAD
37
Gramlich, L. et al. “Essential Fatty Acid Requirements and Intravenous Lipid Emulsions” Journal of
Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol. 00 No.0 pp 1-11. 2019 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1537
What about EFAD?
38
What about EFAD?
• Possible retro-conversion pathways
and mobilization from body stores?
• Do DHA and ARA have a role in
preventing EFAD independently of LA
and ALA?
• New biomarker standards?
39
Anez-Bustillos, L. et al. “Redefining essential fatty acids in the era of novel intravenous lipid emulsions.”
Clinical Nutrition. June 2018. 37(3): 784-789. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.004
ASPEN ILE Recommendations
“SMOF is not available in the United States. Until it is approved for use, no recommendation can be made for use in the United States.”
40
Wales, P.W. et al. “A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: Support of Pediatric Patients with Intestinal Failure at Risk of
Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol 38 No 5. July
2014. pp 538-557. DOI: 10.1177/0148607114527772
41
European 2018 Recommendations
R 4.5 In order to prevent essential fatty acids (EFA) deficiency in preterm
infants a lipid emulsion dosage providing a minimum linoleic acid (LA)
intake of 0.25 g/kg/day can be given. This lipid emulsion dosage ensures
an adequate intake of linolenic acid (LNA) with all 20% ILEs currently
registered for paediatric use. (LoE 2¡,RG 0, strong recommendation for,
strong consensus)
R 4.6 In order to prevent EFA deficiency in term infants and in children a lipid
emulsion dosage providing a minimum LA intake of 0.1 g/kg/day can be
given, which also provides an adequate intake of LNA with all 20% ILEs
currently registered for paediatric use.(LoE 3e4, RG 0, conditional
recommendation for, strong consensus)
R 4.7 In preterm infants, newborns and older children on short term PN, pure
soybean oil (SO) ILEs may provide less balanced nutrition than composite
ILEs. For PN lasting longer than a few days, pure SO ILEs should no
longer be used and composite ILEs with or without fish oil (FO) should
be the first choice treatment (LoE 1, RG A, conditional recommendation
for)
WHAT TO DO DURING A
SHORTAGE
42
Reasons for Shortages
43
Holcombe, Beverly. “Appropriate Parenteral Nutrition Prescribing in the Age of Drug Shortages: Introduction” ASPEN
Webinar, June 19, 2019
44
http://www.nutritioncare.org/ProductShortageManagement/ Accessed July 2019
45 https://www.nutritioncare.org/public-policy/product-shortages/ Accessed July 2019
Resources
Resources for Managing Shortages of PN Components
Organization Drug Shortage Resources
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
American Society of Health-System
Pharmacists
American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition
The Joint Commission
The Center for Medicare and Medicaid
Services
https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafe
ty/DrugShortages/default.htm
https://www.ashp.org/Drug-
Shortages
https://www.nutritioncare.org/public
-policy/product-shortages/
http://www.jointcommission.org/ass
ets/1/18/Revision_to_
MM.02.01.01_HAP_20111222.pdf
https://www.cms.gov/Regulations-
and-Guidance/Guidance/
Manuals/downloads/som107ap_a_hos
pitals.pdf
46 Holcombe, B., Mattox, TW. “Drug Shortages: Effect on Parenteral Nutrition Therapy.” Nutrition in Clinical
Practice. February 2018. Vol. 33 No. 1 pp 53-62. DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10052
Practical Steps
I. Stay Informed
o Drug shortage websites
o Institution
o Outside of institution
II. Do not panic…Instead Assess Situation
o How much medication is on hand
o How long with the shortage last
o Where is it located in the hospital
o Possible sources of alternative medications
III. Come up with Plan
IV. Keep Others Impacted informed
V. Return to Practice as Usual
47
Cober, M. Petrea. “Appropriate Parenteral Nutrition Prescribing in the Age of Drug Shortages: Appropriate PN
Prescribing in Pediatrics: What is Best Practice During and After Shortages?” ASPEN Webinar, June 19, 2019
What to do during a shortage
48
Topline Recommendations
• Do not ration nutrient for PN if the supply of those
components is sufficient to provide the full daily dose
• During component shortages, follow PN management
recommendations available on the ASPEN website at http://www.nutritioncare.org/ProductShortageManagement
• Return to appropriate dosing as soon as the component
shortage has resolved
• Rationing and conservation strategies are intended to be
used only during shortages
• The lack of observed adverse events/deficiencies and the
potential cost savings associated with “partial” dosing
should not be impetus to continue less than optimal dosing http://www.nutritioncare.org/uploadedFiles/Documents/Guidelines_and_Clinical_Resources/PN%20Dosing%201-Sheet-
FINAL.pdf Accessed July 2019
PN AND GUT MICROBIOME
49
Changes to GI Immunity with PN
Changes to GI following PN:
• Gut atrophy – decrease of gut-associated lymphoid tissues (GALT)
• Decrease of innate immune cells
• Loss of of mucosal sIgA release
• Impaired epithelial barrier function and chemical secretions
• Up-regulation of proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and
• interferon-γ (IFN-γ)
50
Pierre, JF. “Gastrointestinal immune and microbiome changes during parenteral nutrition” Am J
Pysiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 312: G246-G256. 2017
Changes to the microbiome
51
Demehri, FR, Barrett, M, Teitelbaum, DH. “Changes to the Intestinal Microbiome With Parenteral Nutrition: Review of
Murine Model and Potential Clinical Implications” Nutrition in Clinical Practice Vol.30 No. 6. 2015
52
Demehri, FR, Barrett, M, Teitelbaum, DH. “Changes to the Intestinal Microbiome With Parenteral Nutrition: Review of
Murine Model and Potential Clinical Implications” Nutrition in Clinical Practice Vol.30 No. 6. 2015
Changes in the gut microbiome of infants on PN
53
Dahlgren, A.F. et al. “Longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome of infants on total parenteral nutrition” Pediatric
Research (2019) 86:107–114; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0391-y
Future Studies?
o Factors contributing to microbial shifts
o Intestinal metabolome (ie, the metabolic
composition of the intestinal lumen in driving
changes in the microbiome.)
o Explorations of administering microbial
metabolites, such as Ahr ligands, SCFAs, and
polyamines
54
Demehri, FR, Barrett, M, Teitelbaum, DH. “Changes to the Intestinal Microbiome With Parenteral Nutrition: Review
of Murine Model and Potential Clinical Implications” Nutrition in Clinical Practice Vol.30 No. 6. 2015
Summary
• Electronic PN resources
– Smart phone apps
– ASPEN Website
• PN Component reviews
– Concerns for deficiencies, toxicities
– Strategies during Shortages
• Injectable Lipid Emulsions
• Gut Microbiome and PN
55
References
Anez-Bustillos, Lorenzo, et al. “Redefining essential fatty acids in the era of novel intravenous lipid emulsions.” Clinical Nutrition . Vol. 37 No. 3. pp 784-789. June 2018. DOI:10.1016/j.clnu.2017.07.004
Cober, M. Petrea. “Appropriate PN Prescribing in Pediatrics: What is Best Practice During and After Shortages?” ASPEN Webinar, June 19, 2019
Crill, Catherine M. and Gura, Kathleen M, “Parenteral Nutrition Support.” The ASPEN Pediatric Nutrition Support Core Curriculum 2nd Edition. Ed. Mark R. Corkins: American Society of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. 2015
Dahlgren, Allison, et al. “Longitudinal changes in the gut microbiome of infants on total parenteral nutrition” Pediatric Research. April 2019 Vol 86 pp.107–114; https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-019-0391-y
Demehri, Farokh R. et al. DH. “Changes to the Intestinal Microbiome With Parenteral Nutrition: Review of Murine Model and Potential Clinical Implications” Nutrition in Clinical Practice Vol.30 No. 6. December 2015 pp. 798-806. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615609904
Domell€of M, et al., ESPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Iron and trace minerals, Clinical Nutrition (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.949
Gramlich, L. et al. “Essential Fatty Acid Requirements and Intravenous Lipid Emulsions” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol. 00 No.0 pp 1-11. 2019 DOI: 10.1002/jpen.1537
56
References
Holcombe, B., Mattox, TW. “Drug Shortages: Effect on Parenteral Nutrition Therapy.” Nutrition in Clinical Practice. February 2018. Vol. 33 No. 1 pp 53-62. DOI: 10.1002/ncp.10052
Lapillonne, A et al. “WSPGHAN/ESPEN/ESPR/CSPEN guidelines on pediatric parenteral nutrition: Lipids.” Clinical Nutrition. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2018.06.946
Mundi, M.S. et al. “Parenteral Nutrition – Lipids Emulsions and Potential Complications” Nutrition Issues in Gastroenterology, Practical Gastroenterolgy, August 2017 Series #166
Pierre, JF. “Gastrointestinal immune and microbiome changes during parenteral nutrition” Am J Pysiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 312: G246-G256. 2017. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00321.2016.
Vanek, Vincent W., et al. “A.S.P.E.N. Position Paper: Recommendations for Changes in Commercially Available Parenteral Multivitamin and Multi-Trace Element Products” Nutrition in Clinical Practice. Vol. 27 No. 4. August 2012. pp. 440-491. DOI: 10.1177/0884533612446706
Vanek, Vincent W., et al. “A Call to Action to Bring Safer Parenteral Micronutrient Products to the US Market.” Nutrition in Clinical Practice. Vol. 30 No.4. August 2015. pp. 559-569. DOI: 10.1177/0884533615589992
Wales, P.W. et al. “A.S.P.E.N. Clinical Guidelines: Support of Pediatric Patients with Intestinal Failure at Risk of Parenteral Nutrition-Associated Liver Disease” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol 38 No 5. July 2014. pp 538-557. DOI: 10.1177/0148607114527772
Worthington, Patricia, et al. “When Is Parenteral Nutrition Appropriate?” Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Vol. 41 No. 3. 2017 pp 324-377. DOI: 10.1177/0148607117695251
57
58