nature’s anonymous donor: the hidden contribution of forests to rural livelihoods
DESCRIPTION
Presentation by Frances Seymour, Director General of CIFOR, 4 March 2011, IFAD Objectives: Highlight the contribution of forests to rural livelihoodsTRANSCRIPT
Nature’s anonymous donor:
The hidden contribution of forests to rural
livelihoods
Frances SeymourIFADMarch 4, 2011
Presentation outline
Brief introduction to CIFORContributions of forests to rural livelihoods
Wood, food, energy, healthAgricultural goods and servicesEmployment
CRP6: A framework for exploiting opportunities and managing risk
Brief introduction to CIFORCIFOR
CIFOR…• an international organization headquartered in Bogor, Indonesiag q g ,• a member of the CGIAR• purpose to conduct research to inform policies and practices that affect forests in developing countriesforests in developing countries
• staff of about 200 globally• annual budget of about $27 million
CIFOR’s visionWe envision a world where:
Forests are high on the political agendaPeople recognize the value of forests for maintaining livelihoods andfor maintaining livelihoods and ecosystemsDecisions that influence forests and the people that depend on them are based on solid science and principles of good governance, and reflect the of good governance, and reflect theperspectives of developing countries and forest‐dependent people
CIFOR’s research domains
1 Enhancing the role of forests in mitigating climate change
Enhancing the role of forests in adapting to climate change2Improving livelihoods through smallholder and3 Improving livelihoods through smallholder and community forestry3Managing trade-offs between conservation and 4 development at the landscape scale4Managing impacts of globalised trade and investment on forests and forest communities5 forests and forest communities5Sustainably managing tropical production forests6
Contributions of forests to rural livelihoodsrural livelihoods
Net change in forest area 2005‐2010(13 million ha lost per year)(13 million ha lost per year)
Source: FAO Forest Resource Assessment (FRA) 2010
On average, households in forest communities derive forest communities derive 24% of their income from forests – not captured in national forests not captured in national accounts
CIFOR’s Poverty and Environment Network study of forest-based contributions to incomes in more than 8,000 households40 study sites in 25 developing countriesIncome and other socio-economic and environmental data, collected on a quarterly basis over a 12-month periodM j it f h i d t b 38 t Majority of research carried out by 38 partners (mainly PhD students) from Asia, Africa & Latin AmericaLaunch planned for June 15 2011 in LondonLaunch planned for June 15, 2011 in London
Wood productspLocal communities exploit forests for construction timber, poles, boats, tools, baskets, and many other usesUlin (ironwood) species identified by local communities in East Kalimantan as one of the most valued forest products
FoodForests provide wild fruits, honey, mushrooms, tubers, grubs, and many other diet supplementsFish are often the most important non timber forest product and Fish are often the most important non-timber forest product, and fisheries depend on healthy forest ecosystems
• Bushmeat can constitute up to 80% of the protein and fat in the diets of households in rural areas of Central Africa
• Research suggests importance of bushmeat to AIDS orphans in Southern Africa
THINKING beyond the canopy
p
Energy
Up to 80 percent of rural energy needs in sub‐Saharan Africa are met by fuelwood and charcoal from forests
HealthHealth
Forests provide:Forests provide:Access to nutritious foodAccess to medicinal plants
lDisease control
Employmentp y
• Research in Cameroon highlights the significance of the domestic timber sectortimber sector
• Some 45,000 people derive income from the sector
THINKING beyond the canopy
Forest-related employment also includes
Gathering non-timber forest products for saleproducts for saleHousehold processing
Such employment is especially important for women, as it is compatible with other household compatible with other household responsibilities
Goods and services to agricultureagriculture
Forests and trees on farms provide fodder and Forests and trees on farms provide fodder and enhance soil fertility
Forests contain the preponderance of the Earth’s Forests contain the preponderance of the Earth s terrestrial biodiversity – including wild relatives of important crop species
Forests provide environmental services important to the agriculture sector, including hydrological regulation and pollination
CRP6: A framework for exploiting opportunities and managing riskopportunities and managing risk
CGIAR Research Program on Forests Trees and AgroforestryForests, Trees, and Agroforestry
Conceptual framework
Component 1 Smallholder production systems and markets
Researchthemes
Enhancing management and production systems for smallholders (food security and nutrition)Increasing income generation and market integration for smallholderssmallholdersImproving policy and institutions to enhance social assets to secure rights in forest- and tree-dependent communitiescommunities
Support to small‐scale producers
• Research suggests significant potential to increase the share
Suppo t to s a sca e p oduce s
potential to increase the share of value captured by small producers of timber and NTFPs
• Example: Teak producers in Example: Teak producers in Java need – better information on
market requirements, andq ,– access to financial services
THINKING beyond the canopy
• Women’s roles in NTFP value chains often invisible• Danger of marginalizing women’s roles in processing through
interventions focused on streamlining production and marketing
THINKING beyond the canopy
M t d ti f f t d t
Research Understanding threats to important tree species and
Component 2 Management and conservation of forest and tree resources
themes Understanding threats to important tree species and formulating genetic conservation strategiesConserving and characterizing high-quality germplasm of important tree crops and their wild relativesimportant tree crops and their wild relativesDeveloping improved silvicultural, monitoring and management practices for multiple useDeveloping tools and methods to resolve conflicts over Developing tools and methods to resolve conflicts over distribution of benefits and resource rights
Certification
CIFOR i t d th F t St d hi
Certification
CIFOR assisted the Forestry Stewardship Council’s efforts to refine FSC certification standards for small-scale operations with prospective application in Brazil prospective application in Brazil, Cameroon, and Mexico.
Beyond timberCIFOR research on the potential of
Beyond timberp
multiple-use management focuses on barriers to integration of timber and Brazil nut production in the Western Amazon.
E i t l i d l d Component 3 Environmental services and landscape
management
Researchthemes
Understanding drivers of forest transitionUnderstanding the consequences of forest transition for environmental services and livelihoodsLearning landscapes: dynamics of multi-functionality
Payments for Environmental S iServices
CIFOR analysis reveals tenure constraints to PES-based approaches to forest conservation in Brazil.
Competitiveness of REDD supply Bottleneck: Land tenure “chaos”
Unknown tenure 53%
Indigenous lands 9%
Agricultural settlements 10%
PA f i bl 9%
Legend
PA for sustainable use 9%
Community lands <1%
Registered properties 1%
CitiesRoadsState limitsWater
Sources: IBAMA, INCRA 2007, Soares-Filho et al. 2006
TenureResearch shows that strengthening community rights to forests can lead to “win-win” outcomes:• improved forest condition • enhanced local incomes
THINKING beyond the canopy
• However, research also shows that communities require: – Support to defend their new rights, and to mobilize forest pp g ,
resource assets to generate income; and– Relief from unnecessary regulatory burdens
THINKING beyond the canopy
Component 4 Climate change adaptation and mitigation
Researchthemes
Harnessing forests, trees and agroforestry for climate change mitigationEnhancing climate change adaptationUnderstanding synergies between climate change mitigation and adaptation
Deforestation and land use change
Risks and opportunities
Deforestation and land use change contribute 12–18% of the world’s total annual carbon emissionsREDD+ ld id h l i ifi t REDD+ could provide channel significant revenue flows to rural communities
Forests themselves are threatened by climate changeForests provide an important source of resilience for adaptation to climate change
Learning from REDD: A global comparative analysiscomparative analysis
CIFOR research input to the Indonesia – Norway Letter of Intent on REDD
Ecosystem-based adaptationp
Joint CIFOR-CATIE research on tropical f d li h d i i forests and climate change adaptation in Honduras influenced the design of one of the first projects ever approved by the UNFCCC’s Adaptation Fund BoardUNFCCC s Adaptation Fund Board.
Component 5 Impacts of trade and investment on forests and people
Researchthemes
Understanding the processes and impacts of forest-related trade and investment Enhancing responses and policy options to mitigate the negative impacts and enhance the positive impacts of trade and investment
Trade and investment
CIFOR research on the implications of biofuel expansion on forests and forest communities
Law enforcement • CIFOR research highlighted danger of local
communities losing livelihood from crackdowns targeting “the little guy with the chainsaw”
THINKING beyond the canopy
targeting the little guy with the chainsaw
Cross cutting themes: GenderApproach:
Gender
Gender disaggregated data collection and analysisGender appropriate research methodsPartnerships with key organizations to build capacity & share knowledge
Example of research:CIFOR study on barriers to women’s participation in forest decision-making and participation in forest decision making and benefit-sharing in Nicaragua and Uganda
Cross-cutting approach:Sentinel Landscapes
Follows key recommendation from the 2009 social science “stripe” review
Sentinel Landscapes
2009 social science stripe review commissioned by the CGIAR Science CouncilBuilds on the CGIAR’s comparative Builds on the CGIAR s comparative advantage to conduct long-term, comparative researchGenerates data about the drivers and Generates data about the drivers and impacts of land use change, as well as approaches to threats and benefits for environmental resilience and the poorenvironmental resilience and the poorIntegrates research and impact pathways to exploit potential synergies across all CRP6 componentsCRP6 components
International, national and local partnershipspartnerships
Levels/Types Research Partners Policy and Practice P
Knowledge‐sharing PPartners Partners
International CIRAD, IRD, CSIRO, Forest Landscape Denmark, IUFRO Norwegian
CPF, FAO, UNEP, World Bank, UN‐REDD, IPCC, FSC IUCN
BBC World Service Trust, Panos, UN‐REDD CPF IUCNIUFRO, Norwegian
University of Life Sciences
FSC, IUCN REDD, CPF, IUCN
Regional CATIE, Amazon Initiative, AFF, COMIFAC, Asia RECOFTC, STCP, CATIE ANAFE, FARA, SEANAFE; ASARECA, CORAF, SAARD, STCP, SA/AP/LAFORGEN
Forest Partnership, ECOWAS
Country or local
NARS, local/national research organizations, FORDA
NARS, government, CBOs, NGOs, private sector companies
Local NGOs and networks, government
Communications and knowledge gsharing “Hurricane” model
enabled by increased i iconnectivity
Impact pathway example:climate changeclimate change
http://www.cifor.cgiar.org/crp6/