nato managing the defence system life cycle cals

Post on 07-Apr-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    1/36

    AUGUST 1998

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    2/36

    MANAGING THE DEFENCE SYSTEM LIFE CYCLE

    The NATO CALS

    Through Life Business Model (TLBM)

    The TLBM presents a vision of how NATO can improve its acquisition and logisticsupport processes by adopting a consistent approach to the management of Defence

    System programs over their full life cycle:

    .. The enablers .

    A Concurrent Engineering approach. Multi Disciplinary Groups, or Integrated Project Teams, involving all stake-

    holders.

    Electronic interaction between participants, based on a Shared DataEnvironment, maintained for the life of the program.

    . The techniques..

    Improved management of requirements, sustained through life. Consistent Life Cycle Strategies for managing risk, quality, configuration,

    acquisition (and re-supply), support and program information.

    Project Optimisation over the life-cycle, including

    Early through life cost modelling, and improved cost awareness Trade-off studies: capability, supportability, cost, risk and in-service dateare treated as independent variables. Continuous review and approval of predicted or measured performanceagainst the current requirement Optimisation of the supply chain, for acquisition and for support.

    Optimisation of support management based on feedback of in-serviceperformance.

    Life cycle management of roles and relationships giving a flexible boundarywith industry.

    Information is managed as an asset.. The outcome

    Faster and cheaper acquisition Improved system availability Cheaper in-service support Safer disposal or re-use

    Interested? Want to know more? Read on.

    For help in using the TLBM, or in managing information more effectively contact the

    NATO CALS Office by Fax: 00 322 707 3598 e mail [email protected]

    We can help you to do better.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    3/36

    TLBM v6.00

    Definition:

    A model to illustrate NATO's improved business processes for

    the through life management of a Defence System, as enabled by a SharedData Environment.

    Scope:

    The model illustrates the core activities which are required to

    respond successfully to the Validated Mission Need and BusinessDirectives for the specific defence system programme over its full lifecycle. Integration of the DS into any wider organisational or businesscontext (e.g. armed force or industrial company) is assumed to occur

    outside the model and is reflected by ICOMs crossing the TLBM boundary,as shown in the context diagram.The TLBM model does not define the order in which these activities are

    to be performed, nor the organisation which may undertake them.

    In using the TLBM DS programs will need to tailor the model to reflecttheir specific relationships with Armed Forces and Industry. The TLBMcan be used to identify information exchanges between organisations byselecting the activities (boxes) each organisation will perform andnoting the arrows which cross the organisational boundary, as shownwithin the TLBM or at its boundary.

    DS will vary in the degree to which their support is integrated with the

    support of other Defence Systems operated by the relevant Armed Forces.The model includes all activities required to provide support for aspecific DS. Information required by others to support the integrationof support for the specific DS with the support of others DS are

    reflected by ICOMs crossing the TLBM boundary.The model reflects several activities which could be performed undercontract. It does not attempt to define relationships or interfaces

    into the industrial supply chain beyond the Prime Contractor.

    Purpose:

    1. The TLBM is one of three NATO CALS products that are requiredto support the Strategic Plan.

    2. To illustrate for NATO, the improved business processes for through lifemanagement of a DS, enabled by an SDE

    3. This purpose is clarified and extended by the following notes,developed as a result of working on the comments received, and the

    outstanding Issues (AnnexH of 4.2.report).

    Intended Use:

    4. The TLBM will be used to support both Track 1 and Track 2 of the 1998

    Strategic Plan as follows:

    Track 1:

    By DS program managers and their staff, supported by NCO, to develop a

    DS Program Strategy for CALS, based on NCOPS. In this context the modelmust:

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    4/36

    - provide a top level over view of the main activities through the DSlife cycle, as enabled by an SDE.- draw attention to certain key activities that need to be managed in a

    consistent manner through all lifecycle phase (CM, QA, ILS, Info

    Management).- illustrate, at a high level, the major information flow within the DSprogram lifecycle, so that the program management can see the totalityof information to be managed through life.- support discussions and decisions of the likely impact, on

    responsibilities and on information flows across boundaries arising from:

    - different organisational boundaries (within the project, between theproject and industry, between the project and the Armed Forces)- different SDE boundaries and capabilities

    - show where the IM processes themselves fit into the TL activities- provide a basis for the development of a program specific TLBM. Orother activity models required to solve specific problems.

    By other members of NCO, and others, in presenting CALS concepts and

    ideas during awareness activities.

    By other NATO or national agencies who are seeking to explore lifecycle issues (e.g. Co-operative Logistics).

    Viewpoint:

    the viewpoint taken in the TLBM is that of the life-time owner of the DS.

    The life time owner is accountable for providing and sustaining thespecific DS,over its full life cycle, to meet the Validated Mission Need andBusinessDirectives agreed and maintained for that DS. Responsibility for

    performing

    this role may be held by different organisations over time.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    5/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    6/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    10/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: MANAGE A DEFENCE SYSTEM THROUGH LIFEA-0

    MANAGE A DEFENCESYSTEM THROUGH LIFE

    Purpose: To illustrate NATO 's improved business

    processes for through life management ofa defence system, enabled by an SDE(See Model Editor for further clarification).

    Viewpoint: the viewpoint ta

    The life time owner is acco

    over its full life cycle, to me

    Directives agreed and main

    this role may be held by dif

    Validated Mission Need

    Goods & Services fm others

    Feedback fm Ops

    Business

    Directives

    Laws &

    Gov

    Policy

    Def.

    Pol.&

    Stds

    Usage&support

    Policy

    O

    P

    Project

    PersExisting

    Infrastructure

    External Data

    DS needing support

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    7/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    8/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    10/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READE

    NODE: TITLE: MANAGE A DEFENCE SYSTEM THROUGH LIFEA0

    A1

    ESTABLISH AND

    CONTROL DS

    PROGRAMME TL

    A2

    OBTAIN DS

    SUPPORT THE US

    the DS

    External

    Data

    Program

    SDE

    Feedback

    fm Ops

    Business

    Directives

    Def.

    Pol.&

    Stds

    Usage&support Policy Op Pro

    Inst to Ops

    Feedback fm Maintenance

    Current Req

    Existing I

    Prg Dir

    Information

    Services

    Support Info

    Proc Spec

    Core Product Data

    Tools & Facs.

    Perf Rep

    Goods &

    Servicesfm

    others

    Trg Req

    Contracts and Requests

    Change Impact

    Project

    Pers

    Predicted Perf

    DSneeding

    support

    Reqd Feedback

    Eval Def

    Spares & Components

    Evaluation Findings

    TestFindings

    Validated

    Mission

    Need

    Required Items

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    9/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    10/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    10/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: ESTABLISH AND CONTROL DS PROGRAMME TLA1

    A11

    ESTABLISH AND

    CONTROL THE

    REQUIREMENT

    A12

    DEVELOP LC

    STRATEGIES

    & POLICY

    A13

    ESTABLISH and

    RUN the DS

    ORGANISATION

    Business

    Directives

    Feedback fm Maintenance

    Usage&support

    Policy

    LC Strat & Pol.

    Required Items

    Change Proposal

    Proc Spec

    Validated Mission Need

    Predicted Perf

    Feedback fm Ops

    Support Info

    Evaluation Findings

    External Data

    TestFindings

    Change Impact

    Predicted LCC

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    11/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    12/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    27/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: DEVELOP LC STRATEGIES & POLICYA12

    A121

    DEFINE LC

    STRATEGY

    AND POLICIES

    A122

    DEFINE

    ACQUISITION

    STRATEGY

    A123

    DEFINE RISK

    STRATEGY

    A124

    DEVELOP ILS

    STRATEGY

    A125

    DEVELOP CM

    STRATEGY

    AND PLAN

    D

    CALS Strategy

    CM Strategy

    QA Strategy

    External Data

    Acq Strat

    Risk Man

    Strategy

    ILS Strategy

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    13/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    14/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    26/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: ESTABLISH and RUN the DS ORGANISATIONA13

    A131

    MANAGE

    PROGRAMSCHEDULE

    A132

    ESTABLISH

    ROLES and

    RELATIONSHIPS

    A133

    PLACE &

    MANAGE

    CONTRACTS

    A134

    MANAGE DS LC

    FUNDING

    MANAGE

    RESOU

    Program WBS

    Budget R

    Change Proposal

    Current Req

    Requests for Assistance

    Financial Implication

    Contract Dir.

    Program Schedule

    Av

    Org Structure

    Activities to be contracted

    External

    Data

    SDE Req.

    Change

    Impact

    Required

    Items

    Perf RepContracts

    Proc Spec

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    15/36

    NODE: TITLE: ESTABLISH and RUN the DS OA13

    A131

    MANAGE

    PROGRAM

    SCHEDULE

    A132

    ESTABLISH

    ROLES and

    RELATIONSHIPS

    A133

    PLACE &

    MANAGE

    CONTRACTS

    M

    Program WBSChange Proposal

    Current Req

    Requests for Assistance

    Financial Implication

    Contra

    Program Schedule

    Org Structure

    Activities to be contracted

    External

    Data

    Change

    Impact

    Required

    Items

    Perf RepContra

    Proc Spec

    A133T PLACE & MANAGECONTRACTS

    This chart briefly illustrates the major activities in placing and managing

    contracts. The requirement should be noted for historic data from other

    programs in developing a contract strategy (External data) and for

    significant feedback from maintenance and operations, to assess the

    performance of reliability or in service availability clauses. This is

    provided by the Performance Report. The proposals received in

    response to the ITT are treated as part of External Data.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    16/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    03/04/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: PLACE & MANAGE CONTRACTSA133

    A1331

    DEVELOP CONTRACT

    STRATEGY

    A1332

    ISSUE SOLICITATION

    A1333

    ASSESS PROPOSALS

    Contract

    Strategy

    Activities to be contracted

    Invitation to Tender

    Available Funding

    Selected

    Contractor

    Contract Information Req

    External Data

    Proc Spec

    Program

    Schedule

    SDE Req.

    Required Items

    Perf Rep

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    17/36

    NODE: TITLE: ESTABLISH and RUN the DS OA13

    A131

    MANAGE

    PROGRAM

    SCHEDULE

    A132

    ESTABLISH

    ROLES and

    RELATIONSHIPS

    A133

    PLACE &

    MANAGE

    CONTRACTS

    M

    Program WBSChange Proposal

    Current Req

    Requests for Assistance

    Financial Implication

    Contra

    Program Schedule

    Org Structure

    Activities to be contracted

    External

    Data

    Change

    Impact

    Required

    Items

    Perf RepContra

    Proc Spec

    A136T MANAGE DS INFORMATION

    The extensive activities involved in managing information through life, in

    the context of a Shared Data Environment are fully described in the

    NCOPS to which reference should be made.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    18/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: NCFP Team DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    14/04/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: MANAGE DS INFORMATIONA136

    A1361

    DEVELOP

    IM PLAN

    A1362

    ESTABLISH &

    OPERATEProgram SDE

    I

    Program

    WBS

    ProgramSchedule SDE Req.

    IM

    PlanExternal Data

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    19/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    20/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: NCFP Team DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    20/05/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: OBTAIN DSA2

    A21

    DEVELOP DS

    A22

    PRODUCE DS

    A23

    CONDUCT TESTING

    Current Req

    Project Pers

    Prg Dir

    Items

    for

    Test

    External Data

    Test Def

    Goods &

    Services fm

    others

    Users

    Items for Rfb

    DS for Deployment

    Tools & Facs.

    As-built Config

    Spares & Components

    Mfr &Rfb

    data

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    21/36

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    22/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    27/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READE

    NODE: TITLE: DEVELOP DSA21

    A211

    DEVELOP

    CONCEPTUALOPTIONS

    A212

    DEFINE DS

    A213

    ENGINEERING

    DESIGN

    A214

    FAILURE

    ANALYSIS

    A215

    DESIGN THE

    SUPPORT

    SYSTEM

    Support Equipment Requirements

    Existing

    Business

    Info

    DS Concept

    Functional Architecture

    TestFindings

    FMECA

    Data

    Current

    Req

    In Service Goals

    External

    Data

    Users

    Prg

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    23/36

    NODE: TITLE: MANAGE A DEFENCE SYSTEMA0

    A1

    ESTABLISH AND

    CONTROL DS

    PROGRAMME TL

    A2

    OBTAIN DS

    External

    Data

    Program

    SDE

    Feedback

    fm Ops

    Business

    Directives

    Def.

    Pol.&

    Stds

    Usage&support Policy

    Inst to Ops

    Feedback fm Maintenance

    Current Req

    Prg Dir

    Information

    Services

    Support I

    Proc Spec

    Core Product D

    Tools & Facs.

    Perf Rep

    Goods &

    Services

    fm

    others

    Trg Req

    Contracts and Requests

    Change Impact

    Project

    Pers

    Predicted Per

    DS

    needing

    support

    Reqd Feedbac

    Eval Def

    Spares & Com

    Evaluation Findings

    TestFindings

    Validated

    Mission

    Need

    Required Items

    A3T SUPPORT THE USE of the DS

    This activity provides the support needed to bring

    individual systems into the condition required for

    operations.

    A31 defines the work to be done, based on the Operational

    Program, the Program Directives and the support

    procedures within the Support Data. A31 also establishes

    the requirement for items to be purchased for use in

    support activities.

    A32 provides storage, transportation and issue as required

    of spares and other items needed for maintenance, based

    on the deliveries from A2.

    A33 undertakes the maintenance needed to restore the DSto the condition required for the next intended operation.

    This includes the activities of diagnosing, repairing, testing

    and calibrating the item in accordance with the Core

    Product and Support Data. The activity also includes the

    work needed to incorporate approved changes to the

    system configuration. Feedback from maintenance is

    provided as specified by Required IS Data, by recording the

    findings, action taken, spares used and issues arising. The

    AS Maintained (current) Configuration is reported to A31

    (and elsewhere as needed) to reflect work undertaken.

    Items removed or no longer required are passed to A4 for

    disposal, recycling or refurbishment.

    A34 undertakes any (non maintenance) activities needed to

    prepare the system for operations e.g fuelling, tow from

    hanger, empty waste tanks etc.

    A35 maintains the support facilities and tools in a fit for use

    condition.

    A36 provides operator and maintainer

    training, in accordance with the requirement

    from A215.

    A37 evaluates the performance of the

    support system, in relation to predictedperformance, in accordance with the

    definition provided from A212.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    24/36

    USED AT: AUTHOR: John Dunford DATE:

    REV:PROJECT: NATO CALS Office - TLBM

    10/03/98

    30/07/98

    NOTES: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    WORKING

    DRAFT

    RECOMMENDED

    PUBLICATION

    READENCO

    NODE: TITLE: SUPPORT THE USE of the DSA3

    A31

    PLAN

    SUPPORT

    A32

    STORE

    TRANSPORT &

    ISSUE ITEMS

    A33

    MAINTAIN,

    UPDATE &

    PROVIDE

    FEEDBACK

    A34

    O&S TASKS

    A35

    MANAGE

    FACILITIES

    T

    Support Plan

    Support Info

    Spares &

    Components

    External Data

    Op Prog

    Existing Infrastructure

    MaintainedDS

    Prg Dir

    DS needing support

    Core Product Data

    Current Req

    Tools & Facs.

    Items for

    Use

    Goods & Services fm others

    In-Scope EvalFindings

    Req Config

    Reqd

    Feedback

    Predicted Perf

    As-maint Config

    Tools & Facs.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    25/36

    TLBM v 6.00

    Act i v i t y Def ini t i ons

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    MANAGE A DEFENCESYSTEM THROUGH LIFE

    A0

    ESTABLISH AND CONTROL

    DS PROGRAMME TL

    A1 Activities needed to create, resource and manage the

    organisation, or organisations needed to obtain, use and

    dispose of the DS over its life cycle.

    ESTABLISH AND CONTROL

    THE REQUIREMENT

    A11 This activity takes the VMN, the Business directives, the

    Usage&Support Policy and any recommendations for

    change arising from within the DS program activities

    and develops, and sustains a Current Requirement

    statement, to the level of detail needed to execute the DS

    program. Requirement change proposals are assessed,

    approved or rejected, seeking external agreement where

    necessary. The valid current requirement is released for

    use. Configuration of the requirement statement, and

    the requirement history are maintained as required.

    DEVELOP LC STRATEGIES

    & POLICY

    A12 Develop and implement an integrated suite of policies

    and strategies for managing the DS over its life-cycle.

    These strategies will shape the development of the

    program organisation and establish the framework

    within which the Program Directives are developed.

    DEFINE LC STRATEGY AND

    POLICIES A121

    This activity establishes a consistent and integrated set

    of high-level policies and strategies to guide the

    management of the DS program over its full life cycle .

    DEFINE ACQUISITION

    STRATEGY A122

    The approach to be taken in acquiring a service or DS

    component, initially and for re-supply. It should cover

    the method of acquisition, the "rent, make or buy"

    policy, the use of competition and or partnering

    arrangements and the contract incentive mechanisms.Particular attention should be paid to ensuring continued

    satisfactory operation of the DS after the contract

    closure, as this determines what rights and what data

    must be acquired as part of the contract, or separately.

    DEFINE RISK STRATEGY

    A123

    Development of the program approach to identifying,

    assessing and managing risk of failure to comply fully

    with the VMN or Business Directives

    DEVELOP ILS STRATEGY

    A124

    Develop a strategy and plan to show how ILS will be

    implemented for the particular DS over its full life cycle.

    DEVELOP CM STRATEGY

    AND PLAN A125

    Develop a strategy and plan to show how CM will be

    implemented for the particular DS over its full life cycle.

    .

    DEVELOP QA STRATEGY

    AND PLANS A126

    Define the actions required to ensure systematic

    approaches are taken to the integrated concurrent design,manufacture and support of the DS and the related

    processes

    DEVELOP CALS STRATEGY

    & PLAN A127

    An assessment of the business and CALS Environment

    facing the DS program, development of the program

    goals for CALS and an assessment of the costs, risks,

    and benefits of the options of CALS-implementation.

    ESTABLISH and RUN the DS

    ORGANISATION

    A13 Set up and run an organisation capable of delivering an

    acceptable DS, that meets the Current Requirement.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    26/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    MANAGE PROGRAM

    SCHEDULE A131

    Define the tasks to be performed and services to be

    provided, in response to the Current Requirement and

    Change Proposals (what to do), and monitor task

    achievement. Develop a Program WBS or Task list.

    Develop any Service Level Agreements needed to

    specify the standard of ongoing services. The WBS or

    Task List must reflect the work needed to assess theimpact of proposed change. Based on the implications

    reported, decisions are made on which proposed changes

    to implement or reject. The work required to implement

    approved changes is reflected in the updated WBS or

    Task list. Develop and publish top level Program

    schedules showing when activities are to be undertaken.

    (Detailed planning of tasks in other activity boxes is

    assumed to occur "locally".)

    ESTABLISH ROLES and

    RELATIONSHIPS A132

    This activity establishes how responsibility for the

    various program tasks is to be allocated over the life

    cycle, including the identification of tasks to be placed

    on contract. As roles and relationships will change over

    time, particular attention should be paid to the

    mechanisms for incentivising and ending contracts andto the management of transitional arrangements (e.g. on

    entry into service).

    PLACE & MANAGE

    CONTRACTS A133

    Action needed to place, operate and close contractual

    agreements required by the DS program. It includes

    generation of the contract requirements and the

    development and operation of payment and incentive

    arrangements.

    DEVELOP CONTRACT

    STRATEGY A1331

    The process of programming, controlling, documenting,

    and implementing the specific requirements levied by

    the negotiated contract or agreement. This process

    includes ensuring that the Staff Target, program

    objectives, and implementation plans are incorporated in

    contractual definitions and design information. Also, it

    includes programming available funding into the

    contractual process through negotiations, incentives, and

    modifications, and the initiation and execution of

    appropriate agreements which may fall outside of the

    specific contract such as those between government

    units.

    ISSUE SOLICITATION

    A1332

    The specific contractual solicitation or tender is prepared

    and Issued, including the Statement of Work, the

    Evaluation Criteria, and the Contract Deliverables.

    ASSESS PROPOSALS

    A1333

    This activity encompasses all actions in assessing the

    formal response to the solicitation or tender, prepared by

    either a contractor or another government entity

    responding to the solicitation, and in choosing the

    successful bidder.RUN CONTRACT

    A1334

    Activities required to place and operate the contract over

    its life time, and, when required, to close it. This will

    include assessment of achievement against requirements,

    approval of payments, and resolution of issues arising.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    27/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    MANAGE DS LC FUNDING

    A134

    Acquire, allocate, and account for the funds needed to

    provide the DS through life. This is assumed to include

    the task of forecasting and tracking DS Life Cycle Cost.

    External data will be needed for this including cost of

    the operator/users and their training. The extensive

    feedback needed to capture costs and expenditure details

    over the life cycle are not shown in this model.MANAGE HUMAN

    RESOURCES A135

    Plan, organise, monitor and control, the provision of

    human resources for DS program lifecycle.

    MANAGE DS INFORMATION

    A136

    The act of constantly monitoring and updating both the

    technical data requirements and the database support

    structure that provides the through-life support the

    Defence System.

    DEVELOP IM PLAN

    A1361

    Define the program Information and IT-infrastructure

    requirements based on an analysis of user needs over the

    life cycle. Develop a plan for capturing, controlling and

    delivering the required information to users.

    ESTABLISH & OPERATE

    Program SDE A1362

    Design, acquisition, deployment and use of a Shared

    Data Environment for the DS. (See NCOPS)

    PROVIDE INFORMATION

    SERVICES A1363COMPARE ACTUAL

    SYSTEM STATE &

    PERFORMANCE WITH

    REQUIRED

    A14 The comparison of actual system state and performance

    with that required by the Current Requirement, Business

    Directives and Operational Program to identify the need

    for changes. This comparison addresses both technical

    and business aspects (e.g. will/can the aircraft achieve

    the specified range; are in-service maintenance costs in

    line with approved budgets, is the actual configuration in

    line with that needed to meet the Current Requirement

    and Operational Program? ) This comparison will

    identify the need for any changes to the Defence System

    itself, or to the DS Program, required to address the

    VMN. (Changes to the VMN are outside the TLBM)

    The comparison may lead to the raising of a Changes

    Proposal, affecting either the DS Design or the DS

    Program. Proposals may also be generated to change

    the Current Requirement, either directly or after

    assessing and rejecting the viability of a Proposed

    Change to the DS. This activity will also address the

    acceptability or otherwise of requests for waivers or

    concessions for components which fall short of the

    design intent. The activity also generates a report on

    the performance of the DS and the DS Program

    (Perf.Rep) and issues advice to Operators over specific

    design limitations applicable as a result of shortfalls

    (e.g. a power restriction applies until a suspect

    component is inspected).

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    28/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    OBTAIN DS A2 The activities necessary to define, design, procure,

    manufacture and test a new or improved DS capability

    to meet the Current Requirement. The activity includes

    the assessment of conceptual options, procurement of

    systems via integrated product development, the

    conducting of total system testing prior to making the

    operational system available for first operationaldeployment. It also includes the refurbishment systems

    and re-testing of Systems or components returned for re-

    cycling from the Operational environment and the

    establishment of a Support Capability which can sustain

    the operational system in use.

    DEVELOP DS A21 Develop possible realisable solutions to the Current

    Requirement, to the appropriate level of detail. This

    activity will be repeated to an increasing level of detail

    as the solution evolves from a proposed DS concept to a

    full definition of the DS to be produced. The DS

    solution must address the intended operational system

    and the support management arrangements needed to

    sustain the system in use, including any special-to-type

    tools, facilities and support equipment needed for thispurpose.

    DEVELOP CONCEPTUAL

    OPTIONS A211

    The action taken to review the operational threat and

    Mission Need to identify and evaluate potential

    alternative solutions. The activity applies to both the

    system and its support, establishing in-service goals for

    operational implementation of the proposed Defence

    System solution. The evaluation will address cost,

    schedule, performance, supportability, and technological

    feasibility to select the conceptual solution, or options to

    be offered in response to the defined operational need.

    DEFINE DS

    A212

    The functional design of the Defence System includes

    analysis of the design features needed by the subsequent

    manufacturing, transportation, use, support, and disposal

    processes. From this analysis the required functionality

    of systems, sub systems and components is derived, for

    both the operational system and the support system, and

    responsibility is allocated to the various elements within

    the functional architecture, for meeting all aspects of the

    overall system of performance, as defined by the Current

    Requirement. Acceptance criteria for test (A23) and

    evaluation (A37) are also defined. This activity also

    decides what items can be bought in from suppliers (as

    Goods and Services from Others), an which still require

    to be designed.

    ENGINEERING DESIGN

    A213

    The detailed engineering design activities to arrive at a

    product model for the DS and its support equipment and

    simultaneously define the manufacturing, refurbishmentand disposal processes. The task includes the design of

    the deployed system and of any special to type support

    tools, equipment and facilities.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    29/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    FAILURE ANALYSIS

    A214

    Analyse failure modes, effects and criticality to define

    product anomaly, criticality, causes/effects and

    compensating provisions. Provide diagnostic and

    troubleshooting recommendations. Predict the

    expected frequency of failure and calculate expected

    reliability.

    DESIGN THE SUPPORTSYSTEM A215

    Create the procedures and data needed to provide anoptimised support capability for the DS, to deliver the

    readiness, sustainability and availability required from

    the operational system, at least life cycle cost. This

    activity will create procedures for operating, servicing

    and maintaining the Operational System, including

    diagnostics and post repair tests. It will define

    intentions for managing the initial and ongoing supply of

    materials, components and spares required for

    manufacture and in-service use. This includes definition

    of the intended spares holding and the development of

    procedures buying, holding, issuing and accounting for

    stock. Decisions on the form of stock management (e.g.

    unique to the DS, by an Armed Force, by National or

    NATO stock systems) and undertaking any screeningand codification activities form part of this task. It will

    develop policies and procedures for the return,

    assessment, refurbishment and disposal of items no

    longer required. It will develop policies and

    procedures for supplying operators and maintainers with

    the information they require to perform operating,

    servicing and maintenance tasks, deciding whether to

    achieve this by components built into the equipment, by

    access to the SDE, by digital storage medium or on

    paper. It will also generate or re-format any additional

    data required for support, which is not already available

    from the SDE. It will define what feedback is needed

    from operators and maintenance staff to optimise the

    performance of the support system, and develop

    procedures for data collection and analysis. It will

    establish training requirements for operators and

    maintainers. The support system design activity will

    also identify requirements for special-to-type tools,

    facilities, test and training equipment, the design of

    which is undertaken in A214.

    PREDICT LIFE CYCLE

    PERFORMANCE A216

    Task of predicting the expected performance of the DS

    in regards to all aspects of the Current Requirement and

    Business Directives. This includes prediction of system

    capability, life, availability, readiness and life cycle cost.

    PRODUCE DS A22 The fabrication, assembly and production testing of the

    Operational DS, of related spares and components; of

    engineering test models, breadboards and prototypes andof associated special-to-type tools, facilities and test

    equipment. The re-furbishment of items returned from

    service use to the original production standard, or as

    otherwise defined, is also included in this activity as it

    requires similar facilities and data.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    30/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    CONDUCT TESTING A23 Process of measuring the performance of all DS

    components (including software, hardware, and human

    interface) for compliance with Current Requirements in

    accordance with the Test Definition and Test Plan. The

    Testing function also applies to the supportability

    features, processes and equipment (e.g. a test of the

    Maintenance Procedures and Tools). Normal productiontesting, applied routinely to each new item, is included

    within A22 (Produce).

    DEPLOY DS A24 The activities needed to, receive, process, and transport

    new Operational DS, support equipment or components,

    from the manufacturing environment to the location from

    which they will normally operate, or be stored. NOTE:

    the operational activity of deploying a DS from its

    peacetime base to another operational environment, as

    part of a Task Force, is not included in the TLBM as this

    requires integration with other systems and activities

    beyond the scope of this model.

    SUPPORT THE USE of the DS A3

    PLAN SUPPORT A31 Decide what work to do, in what order, on the systems

    awaiting support action. The plan will includespecification of the required configuration for each

    individual system. The Plan Support activity also

    generates a requirement for items to be purchased for

    use in support activities.

    STORE TRANSPORT &

    ISSUE ITEMS

    A32 The storage and issue as required of items needed for

    maintenance or to support the DS on operational use

    MAINTAIN, UPDATE &

    PROVIDE FEEDBACK

    A33 Perform the work needed to restore the DS to the

    condition required for the next intended operation

    (except for O&S tasks), by diagnosing, repairing, testing

    and calibration the item in accordance with the Core

    Product Data and Support Information. Implement

    updates and configuration changes in accordance with

    Required Support Actions. Provide maintenance

    feedback on findings, action taken and issues arising.

    Update current configuration to reflect work done.

    O&S TASKS A34 (Non maintenance) activities needed to prepare the

    system for operations e.g. fuelling, tow from hanger,

    empty waste tanks etc.

    MANAGE FACILITIES A35 Activities needed to sustain the "special to type"

    facilities and tools in a fit for use condition.

    TRAIN SUPPORT STAFF A36 [IEEE Std 1220-1994] The tasks, actions, and activities

    to achieve and maintain the knowledge and skill levels

    necessary to efficiently and effectively perform

    operations, support and disposal.

    CONDUCT EVALUATIONS A37 The evaluation of a DS operational and support

    capabilities based on both predetermined criteria and

    needs evolving from operational experience. Theseevaluations include analysis of existing data derived

    from operations and the collection and analysis of data to

    support a particular need. Conclusions and

    recommendations are documented as evaluation

    findings.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    31/36

    Activity Name Activity Definition

    DISPOSE or RECYCLE A4 Activities related with the retired Defence Systems and

    DS components for disposal or refurbishment. Items for

    refurbishment or recycling are returned to A2. Items no

    longer needed are disposed of. Asses the state of the

    item, decide whether to refurbish for use within the

    program, make it available for use by others (sell or re-

    allocate to other program) or scrap as waste.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    32/36

    TLBM 6 .00

    ICOM Repo rt

    Arrow Name Arrow Definition

    Acq Strat An acquisition strategy details the requirements, approaches, andobjectives of a Program Acquisiton Strategy

    Activities to be contracted Definition of the tasks to be undertaken, and services to be provided bycontract.

    Allocated Manpower Allocation of available manpower resources to organisational units andplans for providing trained people

    As-built Config The full configuration definition of each DS post production or re-furbishment.

    As-maint Config The configuration definition of the DS following maintenance. This

    definition would also include the reporting of configuration problems and

    anomalies.Available Funding Actual funds, available to the DS program, after approval and release by

    the Financial Management function.Budget Req Defence System specific requests for funding, in the form of budget

    requirement requests to the external authorities responsible for theprogram Business Directives.Business Directives Program specific business requirements and constraints placed on the

    LC-owner by his tasking body, matched by appropriate resources.Resources are assumed to be defined in terms of an allocated Budget for a

    DS, based on annual cash limits plus a target or acceptable range forwhole Life Cycle Costs. These provide the input from which the programgoals, priorities and budget are derived. This should include anydirectives for international co-operation.

    CALS Strategy

    Change Impact Assessment of the technical implications of a proposed change to the DS,

    or of an "off design" condition, arising in production or in-service use.Change Proposal A proposed change to the DS or the DS program to correct a state or

    performance shortfall. This may include a request from within the DSprogram to change the requirement itself.

    CM Strategy Strategy, Policies and plans for achieving adequate control of DSconfiguration through life

    Contract Dir. Instructions to staff on actions they need to take in regard to DScontracts. This may include supplying information, checking progress, orassisting the contractor to perform elements of the work.

    Contract Information Req The information requirements to be included in DS program contracts.Contract StrategyContracts Contracts and/or Invitations to Tender for the provision of goods or

    services to the DS ProgramContracts and Requests Contracts or Request for action from organisations or entities not

    directly controlled by the DS Life Cycle Owner. This may include:contracts to industry, training requirements, request for changes to otherDS, facility change requests, proposed changes to imposed, constraints

    including requests for additional funding. proposed new common tools.

    Core Product Data Information to define and describe items, components, assemblies andsystems to the level needed by those who will operate and support thesystem in-service. It includes the identity, version, definition, properties,classifications and characteristics of all parts likely to be exchangedduring the in-service life and the assembly structure of the DefenceSystem (the Design Configuration) including permitted options and

    variants.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    33/36

    Arrow Name Arrow DefinitionCurrent Req Current Requirement The latest approved statement of the functional and

    interface requirements for the DS, including the definition of theintentions and requirements for operational use and support (Use Study).The Current Requirement is also assumed to reflect approved changes.

    (Instructions to implement changes, either to the system design, or tospecific systems, are part of Programme Directives). The level of detail in

    the Current Requirement will grow over time. It will range from theValidated Mission Need, at the program outset, to the full technicalspecification of the product to be produced or in service. The Current

    Requirement is assumed to be managed as one or more CIs, in its ownright. The history of requirement changes will be maintained over time,and made available, where needed, through the SDE.

    Def. Pol.& StdsDisposed Items All, or any part of a DS, or waste it has generated, which are no longer

    required for operations and is to be removed from DS Program control.

    DS Concept Selected Concept, or Concepts, to be further developed into a full design.DS Data to Others All data relating to the DS required by external authorities. This

    includes: reports on achievement v targetDS for Deployment A new DS or component ready for initial deployment.

    DS needing support The Operational Defence System requiring support, as returned fromoperations.

    DS ready for Ops DS ready for OperationsEval Def Evaluation Definition: The criteria and specific manner in which

    evaluations will take place.

    Evaluation Findings The documented results of an evaluation of a DSExisting Business Info Existing Business Information: Data, needed by the LSA activity, from

    external sources. This may include government-provided list of approvedLSA tools, standard supportability data such as labour costs at eachechelon, existing documented historical data, etc.

    Existing Infrastructure Facilities Systems Tools

    External Data Data from other Systems or Authorities, needed by the DS program.Other DS program Schedules, Policies, WBS, Budgets and Organisations(A131/2/3), Data on other Contracts and Contractors (A134), Personnelinformation (A135), extent of and experience with existing Info Systems

    (A136) Data needed for Support Design (A215) including historical

    data, predecessor data, independent study data, health, safety orenvironmental data and data on existing tools, facilities, components andparts. Current locations holdings of other equipment and spares (A24)

    Feedback fm Maintenance Feedback fm Maintenance Feedback of information arising from

    maintenance activities. This may include reporting of defects found,actions taken, resources used and proposals for design or support systemchanges. It must include the Current Product Structure (Configuration)post maintenance.

    Feedback fm Ops Feedback from Operators Ops History Survey Results State, Failures,

    Deficiencies Changes madeFinancial Implication Report of the financial implications of the program WBS, including

    proposed changes.

    FMECA Data Description of possible failure modes for the DS, with their likelyconsequences and frequency of occurence.

    Functional Architecture An arrangement of functions and their sub-functions and interfaces(internal and external) that define the execution sequencing, conditionsfor control of system data flows, and the allocation of performancerequirements to each functional element within the operational andsupport systems, to satisfy the overall system requirement. Support

    influence on design is achieved through the allocation of requirements in

    the functional architectureGoods & Services fmothers

    Goods and Services from others

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    34/36

    Arrow Name Arrow DefinitionILS Strategy The formal planning document for the integration of the activities

    concerned with logistics support. It is kept current throughout the projectlife. It sets forth the concept of operational support, provides a detailedILS programme to fit with the overall programme and results in the

    necessary ILS information required by decision making bodies to makesound decisions in the system development and production.

    IM Plan Plan to manage information over the LCIn Service Goals A statement of general utilisation intentions for a Defence Systemincluding reference to national or co-operative logistics and training

    arrangements.Information Services Provision of Information services which cannot be provided directly

    through the SDE itself e.g archiving, retrieval of historic records, specialreports, new applications, new hardware, help desk services etc.

    In-Scope EvalFindings In-Scope Evaluation Findings: Evaluation findings that indicate a

    requirement to change Operational Support Instructions or Operational

    Support Requirements that do not effect existing system plans orstrategies.

    Inst to OpsInvitation to Tender A formal request for a proposal from a contractor upon which a contract

    for goods or services could be based. It includes, either directly or byreference, all of the technical, commercial and legal information needed

    to establish and operate a successful contract.Items for Rfb Items for Refurbishment Items removed from operational service and

    returned for reconditioning or repair

    Items for TestItems for Use Spares and other consumables supplied for incorporation into the main

    equipment, (this includes the "on board stock" where appropriate)Laws & Gov Policy Relevant Laws and regulations from beyond the Defence environmentLC Strat & Pol. The set of documents which provide the DS program team with policies

    and strategies for managing the acquisition and support of a DS in a

    consistent manner over its lifecycle. It includes: Acquisition Strategy(Acq Strat) Quality Management Plans (ImpPlan) ILSPlans

    Maintained DS DS after completion of the maintenance tasks, awaiting preparation fordeployment on mission

    Mfr & Rfb data Manufacturing and refurbishment data: information needed to

    manufacture, refurbish or dispose of the DS and its associatedcomponents

    Op ProgOrg Structure

    Perf Rep The currently achieved (or predicted) performance of the DS in relationto Current Requirement and Business Directives, highlighting any actualor expected shortfalls in technical or financial performance.

    Predicted LCC Prediction of the expected Life Cycle Cost of the DSPredicted Perf

    Prg Dir Program Directives: Program management directives generated withinthe DS Program, issued to set up the DS Organisation and to control thework of staff who can be tasked directly by the DS Life Cycle Owner.

    (other resources are obtained or tasked through Contracts and Requests)Programme Directives include the Organisational Structure and approved

    budgets, WBS, program plans, "make or buy" plans, instructions to buy,change authorisations and all other forms of instruction used to makethings happen on the program. The Program Directives alsocommunicate the specific policies, procedures and plans established bythe DS program and approved by the Life Cycle Owner.

    Proc Spec Technical or functional definition of Items to be purchased, to the level of

    definition needed to enable contract action to proceed. Note: Instructionto place orders for specific Items of Supply are provided from twosources: the Program WBS, for initial acquistion or from Plan Support,for re-supply, as "Required Items".

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    35/36

    Arrow Name Arrow DefinitionProgram Schedule Plans showing what activities have to be performed when, to meet DS

    Program requirements.Program SDE The hardware, software and communications and information

    infrastructure needed to enable participants in DS program to access the

    information they require to conduct the business processes illustrated bythis TLBM.

    Program WBS Definition of the activities to be performed to deliver (or dispose of) asuccessful DS. This may take any form. Typical outputs would include aformal work breakdown structure, a Task list or a series of Service Level

    Agreements for ongoing tasks. Changes to the DS and to the workprogram are initiated by changes to the Program WBS.

    Project Pers Project Personnel Staff from industry, government or the Armed Forceswho is supplied to work on the programme, potentially as part of a MultiDisciplinary Team or Integrated Project Team. Will include operational

    user on temporary deployment to the DS program to provide their

    experience or evaluation skills. People supplied as a resource are trainedand educated adequately except in regard to the DS itself.

    QA StrategyReq Config The required configuration state of a specific DS to be achieved by the

    maintenance activity. This would define the desired operationalconfiguration required for a particular mission (e.g. fit the long range

    fuel tanks), and indicate what approved changes/modifications were to beincorporated during a specific maintenance session.

    Reqd Feedback

    Requests for Assistance Requests for assistance from or action by parties beyond the control ofthe DS Life Cycle Owner (e.g. the owners of other DS, the ArmedForces, External training authorities, The DoD etc)

    Required Items The identity, quantity and required delivery details for purchased itemsneeded to support the use of the DS.

    Returned Items

    Risk Man StrategySDE Req. Requirement Statement for the Program SDESelected ContractorSpares & Components Spares and components obtained for use in support activities.

    Support Equipment

    Requirements

    Requirements for special-to-type support equipment, tools, training

    equipment and facilities required to support the DS.Support Info Support information provides the directives and data required to support

    the DS in-service. It includes: maintenance policy and maitenanceprocedures including, task descriptions and resources needed (skills,

    tools, parts etc); diagnostic, callibration and test procedures; supplysupport policy and procedures e.g. supply policy, stock holdings, initialstock buy, stock management and provisioning procedures, provisioningdata, codification data return, assesment, re-furbishment and disposalinstructions.

    Support Plan Instructions (short term) and plans (longer terms) defining the work to beundertaken on specific DS or DS components requiring support.

    Test Def Test Definition: Test objectives which are based on DS specifications and

    program requirements that define the parameters on which thequalification and quality tests are based.

    TestFindings The results of comparing actual results with identified performance,functional, and logistic specifications.

    Tools & Facs. The special-to-type tools, test equipments and facilities created for theDS.

    Trained People

    Trg Req Training Requirements A specification of the training needed by the

    operators and maintainers of the DS, plus a request to the trainingauthorities to provide the necessary training in a time scale required bythe program.

  • 8/3/2019 Nato Managing the Defence System Life Cycle Cals

    36/36

    Arrow Name Arrow DefinitionUsage&support Policy Constraints, requirements or policy guidance relating to the operation or

    support of the DS in service, placed on the program by the known orpotential users of the System

    Users The designated user of the proposed system (maintainers, operators,

    repairmen, commanders, etc.), provided to contribute to, or assess theevolving product and support design.

    Validated Mission Need A statement based on a mission analysis, identifying in broad outline aquantitative or qualitative operational deficiency that cannot be solvedsatisfactorily with existing forces or equipment. The mission need is

    constantly re-evaluated throughout the life of the Defence System andmay change over time. The VMN will also define any requirements forinteroperability with other DS.