national vital statistics reports: infant mortality statistics from the 2006 period linked...

Upload: stateoftheusa

Post on 30-May-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    1/32

    National VitalStatistics ReportsVolume58,Number17 April30,2010

    Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 PeriodLinkedBirth/InfantDeathDataSetbyT.J.Mathews,M.S.,andMarianF.MacDorman,Ph.D.,DivisionofVitalStatistics

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESCenters for Disease Control and Prevention

    National Center for Health StatisticsNational Vital Statistics System

    MT

    WY

    ID

    WA

    OR

    NV

    UT

    CA

    AZ

    ND

    SD

    NE

    CO

    NM

    TX

    OK

    KS

    AR

    LA

    MO

    IA

    MN

    WI

    IL IN

    KY

    TN

    MSAL GA

    FL

    SC

    NC

    VAWV

    OH

    MI

    NY

    PA

    MD

    DE

    NJ

    CT RI

    MA

    ME

    VTNH

    DC

    Not significantly different from U.S.

    Significantly lower than U.S.

    10 lowest

    HI

    AK

    Significantly higher than the U.S.10 highestSOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

    Figure1. Infantmortalityratesbystate:UnitedStates,20042006

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    2/32

    2 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010Abstract

    ObjectivesThis report presents 2006 period infant mortalitystatistics from the linkedbirth/infantdeathdataset (linked file)byavariety of maternal and infant characteristics. The linked file differsfrom the mortality file, which is based entirely on death certificatedata.

    MethodsDescriptivetabulationsofdataarepresentedandinterpreted.

    ResultsTheU.S.infantmortalityratewas6.68infantdeathsper1,000livebirthsin2006,a3percentdeclinefrom6.86in2005.Infantmortalityratesrangedfrom4.52per1,000livebirthsforCentralandSouth American mothers to 13.35 for non-Hispanic black mothers.Infantmortalityrateswerehigherforthoseinfantswhosemotherswereborn inthe50statesortheDistrictofColumbia,wereunmarried,orwereborn inmultipledeliveries. Infantmortalitywas also higher formale infants and infants born preterm or at low birthweight. Theneonatalmortalityratewasessentiallyunchangedin2006(4.46)from2005(4.54).Thepostneonatalmortalityratedecreased4percent,from2.32in2005to2.22in2006.Infantsbornatthelowestgestationalagesand

    birthweights

    have

    alarge

    impact

    on

    overall

    U.S.

    infant

    mortality.

    Forexample,morethanhalfofall infantdeaths intheUnitedStatesin 2006 (54percent) occurred to the 2percent of infants born verypreterm(lessthan32weeksofgestation).Still, infantmortalityratesfor latepreterm infants(3436weeksofgestation)were three timesthoseforterminfants(3741weeks).Thethreeleadingcausesofinfantdeathcongenitalmalformations, lowbirthweight,andsudden infantdeathsyndrometakentogetheraccountedfor46percentofallinfantdeaths.Thepercentageof infantdeaths thatwere preterm-relatedwas36.1percentin2006.Thepreterm-relatedinfantmortalityratefornon-Hispanic black mothers was 3.4 times higher and the rate forPuerto Rican mothers was 84percent higher than for non-Hispanicwhitemothers.Keywords: infanthealthcbirthweightcgestationalagecmaternalcharacteristics

    IntroductionThis report presents infantmortality data from the 2006 period

    linked file.The linked file contains a numerator file consisting of allinfant deaths occurring in 2006 that have been linked to theircorrespondingbirthcertificates,whetherthebirthoccurredin2005orin2006.

    Inthelinkedfile,informationfromthedeathcertificateislinkedtoinformationfromthebirthcertificateforeachinfantunder1yearofagewhodied in the50states, theDistrictofColumbia,PuertoRico, theVirginIslands,orGuamduring2006(1).Linkedbirth/infantdeathdataarenotavailableforAmericanSamoaandtheCommonwealthoftheNorthern Marianas. The purpose of the linkage is to use the manyadditionalvariablesavailablefromthebirthcertificatetoconductmoredetailedanalysesofinfantmortalitypatterns(2).ThisreportpresentsinfantmortalitydatabyraceandHispanicoriginofthemother,birth-weight, period of gestation, sex of infant, plurality, maternal age,live-birthorder,mothersmaritalstatus,mothersplaceofbirth,ageatdeath, and underlying cause of death (Tables18 and AE; Figures16).Othervariablesavailable in the linked file(1)butnotdiscussed in this report include fathersage, race,andHispanicorigin;

    birth attendant; place of delivery; mothers weight gain during pregnancy;andmanymedicalandhealthmeasurements.

    Anotherreport,basedondataexclusivelyfromthevitalstatisticsmortalityfile,providesfurtherinformationontrendsininfantmortalityandcausesofinfantdeath(3).Thelinkedfileisusedforanalysisandforcalculating infantmortality ratesby raceandethnicity,whicharemoreaccuratelymeasuredfromthebirthcertificate.Someratescalculated from the mortality file differ from those published using thelinkedfile.Amoredetaileddiscussionofthedifferencesinthenumberofinfantdeathsandinfantmortalityratesbetweenthelinkedfileandthemortality file ispresented in TechnicalNotes.

    MethodsData shown in this report are based on birth and infant death

    certificates registered in all states, the District of Columbia, PuertoRico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam. As part of the Vital StatisticsCooperativeProgram,eachstateprovidedtotheCentersforDiseaseControlandPreventions(CDC)NationalCenter forHealthStatistics(NCHS)matchingbirthanddeathcertificatenumbersforeach infantunder 1 year of age who died in the state during 2006. When thebirth and death occurred in different states, the state of death wasresponsible for contacting the state of birth identified on the deathcertificate toobtain theoriginalbirthcertificatenumber.NCHSusedthe matching birth and death certificate numbers provided by thestates to extract final edited data from the NCHS natality andmortality statistical files. These data were linked to form a singlestatistical record, therebyestablishinganational linkedrecord file.

    After the initial linkage, NCHS returned lists of unlinked infantdeathrecordsandrecordswithinconsistentdatabetweenthebirthanddeathcertificatestoeachstate.Stateadditionsandcorrectionswereincorporated,anda finalnational linked filewasproduced. In2006,98.7percent of all infant death records were successfully linked ormatchedtotheircorrespondingbirthrecords.Recordswereweightedtoadjustforthe1.3percentofinfantdeathrecordsthatwerenotlinkedto theircorrespondingbirthcertificates;see TechnicalNotes.

    Informationonbirthsbyage,race,ormaritalstatusofmotherisimputedifitisnotreportedonthebirthcertificate.Theseitemswerenot reported for less than1percentofU.S.births in2006(2).

    RaceandHispanicoriginarereportedindependentlyonthebirthcertificate.IntabulationsofbirthdatabyraceandHispanicorigin,dataforHispanicpersonsarenotfurtherclassifiedbyracebecausethevastmajorityofwomenofHispanicoriginarereportedaswhite.Data forAmericanIndianorAlaskaNative(AIAN)andAsianorPacificIslander(API)

    births

    are

    not

    shown

    separately

    by

    Hispanic

    origin

    because

    the

    vastmajorityof thesepopulationsarenon-Hispanic.

    Cause-of-deathstatisticsinthispublicationareclassifiedinaccordancewiththeInternationalStatisticalClassificationofDiseasesandRelatedHealthProblems,TenthRevision(ICD10)(4);seeTechnicalNotes.

    Thisreportincludesdatabasedonthe1989and2003revisionsofthebirthcertificate.NineteenstatesandPuertoRicoimplementedthe2003revisionoftheU.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirthonorbefore January 1, 2006 (revised). The remaining reporting areasincludedatawhicharebasedonthe1989revisionoftheU.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirth(unrevised).Revisedandunreviseddataare

    http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-http://-/?-
  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    3/32

    3NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010combinedwhencomparable.Formoreinformation,seeNationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume57Number7,Births:FinalDatafor2006(2).

    Threekeydataitemsareconsiderednoncomparablebetweenthe1989and2003revisions:trimesterofpregnancyinwhichprenatalcarebegan,maternaleducationalattainment,andmaternalsmokingduringpregnancy (2).Because infantswhodied in2006wereborn inboth2005and2006,thisreportincludesdataonthesethreetopicsfromthe12states that implemented the2003revisionasofJanuary1,2005(seerespectivetextsectionsandTechnicalNotes).The12statesareFlorida, Idaho, Kansas, Kentucky, Nebraska, New Hampshire, NewYork (excluding NewYork City),Pennsylvania, SouthCarolina,Tennessee,Texas,andWashington.Resultsforthesethreeitemsfromthelimitedreportingareaarenotgeneralizabletothecountryasawhole(2).Databymaternaland infantcharacteristics

    This report presents descriptive tabulations of infant mortalitydata by a variety of maternal and infant characteristics. Thesetabulations are useful for understanding the basic relationshipsbetweenrisk factorsand infantmortality,unadjusted for thepossibleeffectsofothervariables.Inreality,womenwithoneriskfactoroftenhave other risk factors as well. For example, teenage mothers aremore likely to also be unmarried and of a low-income status, andmotherswhodonotreceiveprenatalcarearemore likely tobeofalow-incomestatusanduninsured.Thepreferredmethodfordisentangling themultiple interrelationshipsamongrisk factors ismultivariateanalysis; however, an understanding of the basic relationshipsbetweenrisk factorsand infantmortality isanecessaryprecursor tomore sophisticated types of analyses and is the aim of thispublication.

    Race and Hispanic origin dataInfant mortality rates are presentedherebyraceanddetailedHispanicoriginofmother.Thelinkedfile isparticularlyusefulforcomputingaccurate infantmortalityratesfor thispurposebecause theraceandHispanicoriginof themotherfromthebirthcertificateareusedinboththenumeratoranddenominator of the infant mortality rate. In contrast, for the vital statisticsmortality file, race information for thedenominator is the raceof themotherasreportedonthebirthcertificateandthatforthenumeratoristheraceofthedecedentasreportedonthedeathcertificate(2,3,5).Thus,standardinfantmortalityratescanbebasedoninconsistentrace

    information. In addition, race information from the birth certificatereportedbythemotherisconsideredtobemorereliablethanthatfromthedeathcertificate,wheretheraceandethnicityofthedeceasedinfantarereportedbythefuneraldirectorbasedoninformationprovidedbyaninformantorbyobservation.Thesedifferentreportingmethodscanleadtodifferencesinrace- andethnicity-specificinfantmortalityratesbetween the twodata files(3,5).

    The2003revisionof theU.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirthallows the reportingofmore thanonerace (multipleraces) foreachparent(6,7).Informationonthischangeispresentedinarecentreport(2).Twenty-threestatesreportedmultipleraceontheirbirthcertificatesforeitherpartorallof2006.Toprovideuniformityandcomparabilityof data, multiple race is imputed to a single race (see TechnicalNotes).

    Statistical significanceText statements have been tested forstatisticalsignificance,andastatementthatagiveninfantmortalityrateis higher or lower than another rate indicates that the rates aresignificantly different. Information on the methods used to test forstatisticalsignificance,aswellasinformationondifferencesbetweenperiod andcohortdata, theweightingof the linked file,andacomparison of infant mortality data between the linked file and the vitalstatisticsmortality filearepresented in TechnicalNotes.Additionalinformationonmaternalage,maritalstatus,periodofgestation,birth-weight,andcause-of-deathclassification isalsopresented in TechnicalNotes.ResultsandDiscussionTrends in infantmortality

    The overall 2006 infant mortality rate from the linked file was6.68infantdeathsper1,000livebirths,3percentlowerthanthe2005rate

    of

    6.86

    (Table

    C);

    the

    2006

    rate

    from

    the

    mortality

    file

    was

    6.69

    (3).Theneonatalmortality rate for2006 (4.46)wasnotsignificantlydifferentfrom2005(4.54).Thepostneonatalmortalityratedecreasedfrom2.32 in2005 to2.22 in2006(TablesAandB for2006data).

    Whiletheinfantmortalityratewas9percentlowerin2000(6.89)than in1995(7.57),theratehasdeclinedonly3percentsince2000(Figure2andTableC).Significantdeclines in2006 from2005wereobservedforinfantsofnon-Hispanicwhitemothers(3percent)andthetotalofHispanicmothers (4percent) (TableC).

    TableA. Infant,neonatal,andpostneonataldeathsandmortalityrates,byraceofmother:UnitedStates,2006 linkedfile

    Live Numberofdeaths Mortalityrateper1,000 livebirthsRaceofmother births Infant Neonatal Postneonatal Infant Neonatal Postneonatal

    All races. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,265,593 28,509 19,041 9,468 6.68 4.46 2.22White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,310,331 18,422 12,292 6,130 5.57 3.71 1.85Black. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 666,494 8,595 5,778 2,818 12.90 8.67 4.23American IndianorAlaskaNative . . . . 47,720 395 205 190 8.28 4.30 3.98AsianorPacific Islander. . . . . . . . . . 241,048 1,097 766 331 4.55 3.18 1.37NOTES: Infantdeathsareweightedsonumbersmaynotexactlyadd to totalsdue torounding.Neonatal is less than28daysandpostneonatal is28days tounder1year.Twenty-threestatesreportedmultiple-racedataon thebirthcertificate for2006.Themultiple-racedata for thesestateswerebridged to thesingle-racecategoriesof the1977standards forcomparabilitywithotherstates;seereference2 in thisreport.

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    4/32

    4 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010

    . . . Categorynotapplicable.1Originofmothernotstated included in Alloriginsbutnotdistributedamongorigins.2Includesracesother thanwhiteorblack.NOTES: Infantdeathsareweightedsonumbersmaynotexactlyadd to totalsdue torounding.Neonatal is less than28daysandpostneonatal is28days tounder1year.PersonsofHispanicoriginmaybeofany race. In this table,Hispanicwomenareclassifiedonlybyplaceoforigin;non-Hispanicwomenareclassifiedbyrace.Seereference2 in thisreport.Twenty-threestatesreportedmultiple-racedataon thebirthcertificate for2006.Themultiple-racedata for thesestateswerebridged to thesingle-racecategoriesof the1977standards forcomparabilitywithotherstates;seereference2 in thisreport.

    InfantmortalitybyraceandHispanicoriginofmother

    As inpastyears, infantmortality rates in2006variedconsiderably by race and Hispanic origin of mother (8,9). The highest rate,13.35 per 1,000 live births, was for infants of non-Hispanic blackmothers, nearly three times greater than the lowest rateof 4.52 forinfants of Central and South American mothers and 4.55 for APImothers. Rates were also fairly high for infants ofAIAN (8.28) andPuertoRican(8.01)mothers.Rateswere intermediate,butallbelowthe U.S. rate, for infants of non-Hispanic white (5.58) and Mexican(5.34)mothers.Cubanmothers(5.08)alsohada lowrate(Figure2;TablesAC).Infantmortalitybystate

    In2006,compared with2005, only threestates had significantchanges in infant mortality rates. Rates declined in South Carolina

    (12percent), California (5percent), andTexas (5percent) (TableD).ToobtainstatisticallyreliableratesbyraceandHispanicorigin,threeyears of data were combined (Table3). Across the United States,rates are generally higher in the South and Midwest and lowerelsewhere (Figure1). For 20042006, infant mortality rates rangedfrom10.63forMississippito4.93forMassachusetts.Thehighestratenoted, 12.57, was for the District of Columbia (D.C.); however, theD.C. rate is more appropriately compared with rates for other largeU.S.citiesbecauseofthehighconcentrationofwomenathighriskintheseareas.

    Forinfantsofnon-Hispanicblackmothers,mortalityratesrangedfrom20.85inHawaiito8.12inWashington.Forinfantsofnon-Hispanicwhitemothers,Oklahomahad thehighest infantmortalityrate(7.68)andHawaiihad the lowest rate (3.66)amongstates.Among the41states where infant mortality rates could be reliably computed forHispanic mothers, Rhode Island had the highest rate (7.95) andMinnesotahad the lowest(4.27).

    TableB. Infant,neonatal,andpostneonataldeathsandmortalityrates,byHispanicoriginofmotherandbyraceofmother formothersofnon-Hispanicorigin:UnitedStates,2006 linked file

    Live Numberofdeaths Mortality rateper1,000 livebirthsHispanicoriginand raceofmother births Infant Neonatal Postneonatal Infant Neonatal Postneonatal

    Allorigins1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,265,593 28,509 19,041 9,468 6.68 4.46 2.22TotalHispanic. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,039,079 5,622 3,883 1,739 5.41 3.74 1.67

    Mexican. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 718,148 3,837 2,679 1,158 5.34 3.73 1.61PuertoRican. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,932 536 364 172 8.01 5.44 2.57Cuban. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,936 86 61 24 5.08 3.60 1.42CentralandSouthAmerican. . . . . . 165,321 748 515 233 4.52 3.12 1.41OtherandunknownHispanic . . . . . 71,742 415 264 151 5.78 3.68 2.10

    Non-Hispanic total2. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,196,111 22,493 14,820 7,673 7.04 4.64 2.40Non-Hispanicwhite . . . . . . . . . . . 2,308,654 12,884 8,410 4,474 5.58 3.64 1.94Non-Hispanicblack . . . . . . . . . . . 617,260 8,241 5,525 2,716 13.35 8.95 4.40

    Notstated. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,403 395 338 57 ... ... ...

    TableC. Infantmortalityrates,byraceandHispanicoriginofmother:UnitedStates,1995,20002006 linked filesPercentchange

    RaceandHispanicoriginofmother 1995 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 20002006 20052006All races. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.57 6.89 6.84 6.95 6.84 6.78 6.86 6.68 **3.0 **2.6White. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.30 5.71 5.69 5.79 5.72 5.66 5.73 5.57 **2.5 **2.8Black. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.58 13.48 13.34 13.81 13.50 13.25 13.26 12.90 **4.3 2.7American IndianorAlaskaNative . . . . 9.04 8.30 9.65 8.64 8.73 8.45 8.06 8.28 0.2 2.7AsianorPacific Islander. . . . . . . . . . 5.27 4.87 4.73 4.77 4.83 4.67 4.89 4.55 6.6 7.0Hispanic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.27 5.59 5.44 5.62 5.65 5.55 5.62 5.41 3.2 **3.7

    Mexican. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.03 5.43 5.22 5.42 5.49 5.47 5.53 5.34 1.7 3.4PuertoRican. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.88 8.21 8.53 8.20 8.18 7.82 8.30 8.01 2.4 3.5Cuban. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.29 4.54 4.28 3.72 4.57 4.55 4.42 5.08 11.9 14.9CentralandSouthAmerican. . . . . . 5.52 4.64 4.98 5.06 5.04 4.65 4.68 4.52 2.6 3.4

    Non-Hispanicwhite. . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.28 5.70 5.72 5.80 5.70 5.66 5.76 5.58 2.1 **3.1Non-Hispanicblack. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.65 13.59 13.46 13.89 13.60 13.60 13.63 13.35 1.8 2.1** Significantatp

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    5/32

    5NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010

    Mortalityratescouldbereliablycomputed foronly13statesforinfantsofAIANmothersandfor31statesforinfantsofAPImothers.ForinfantsofAIANmothers,mortalityratesrangedfrom12.28inSouthDakotato6.30inCalifornia.MortalityratesforinfantsofAPImothersranged from8.64 in Iowa to3.19 inConnecticut.Sex of infant

    In2006,theoverallmortalityrateformale infantswas7.31per1,000 live births, 21percent higher than the rate for female infants(6.02).InfantmortalityrateswerehigherformalethanfemaleinfantsineachraceandHispanic-origingroup(Tables1and2),althoughthedifference was not significant for infants of Cuban and Central andSouthAmericanmothers.Multiplebirths

    Formultiplebirths,theinfantmortalityratewas30.07,morethanfivetimestherateof5.87forsingletonbirths(Tables1and2).Infantmortality rates for multiple births were higher than the rates forsingletonbirths forall raceandHispanic-origingroups.

    Theriskofinfantdeathincreaseswiththeincreasingnumberofinfants in the pregnancy. In 2006, the infant mortality rate for twins(27.92)wasnearlyfivetimestherateforsingletonbirths(5.87).Theratefortriplets(69.63)wasnearly12timesandtherateforquadruplets(146.48)was25 timeshigher than the rate forsingletonbirths (Figure3).Areliable infantmortality rate forquintupletandhigherorderbirthscouldnotbecomputeddue tosmallnumbersof infantdeathsforthatcategory.Infantmortalityratesforsingletonandtwinbirthsweresignificantlylowerin2006thanin2005,whiletheinfantmortalityratefor tripletswassignificantlyhigher in2006comparedwith2005.

    Multiplepregnancycanleadtoanaccentuationofmaternalrisksandcomplicationsassociatedwithpregnancy(2,1012).Forexample,multiplebirthsaremuchmorelikelytobepretermandoflowbirthweightthansingletonbirths(2,1012).Thehigherriskprofileofmultiplebirths

    has a substantial impact on overall infant mortality (10,1315). Forexample,in2006multiplesaccountedfor3percentofalllivebirths,but15percentofall infantdeaths in theUnitedStates (Table1).Ageatdeath

    In 2006, two-thirds of all infant deaths (19,041 out of 28,509)occurred during the neonatal period (from birth through 27 days of

    TableD. Infantmortalityrates,bystate:2000,2005,and2006 linked files[Byplaceof residence]

    Infantmortality rateper1,000 livebirths Percent

    changeState 2000 2005 2006 20052006

    Total

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    6.89

    6.86

    6.68

    **2.6

    Alabama. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.51 9.53 8.98 5.7Alaska . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.92 5.93 7.00 18.1Arizona. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.75 6.85 6.36 7.2Arkansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.23 7.83 8.45 7.9California. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.42 5.32 5.04 **5.2Colorado. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.14 6.44 5.77 10.5Connecticut . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.51 5.85 6.17 5.5Delaware. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.59 9.02 8.09 10.3DistrictofColumbia . . . . . . . . . . . . 12.13 13.67 11.85 13.3Florida . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.91 7.24 7.26 0.3Georgia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.45 8.07 8.07 0.0Hawaii . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.09 6.58 5.85 11.2Idaho. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.56 5.98 6.82 14.0Illinois . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.48 7.38 7.29 1.2Indiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.79 8.04 7.91 1.6Iowa . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.43 5.44 5.12 5.9Kansas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.55 7.37 7.15 3.0Kentucky. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.10 6.73 7.50 11.4Louisiana. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.03 9.85 9.96 1.1Maine. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.85 6.87 6.29 8.5Maryland. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.51 7.30 7.95 9.0Massachusetts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.61 5.13 4.85 5.3Michigan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.19 7.89 7.33 7.0Minnesota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.62 5.09 5.18 1.8Mississippi. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.64 11.46 10.53 8.1Missouri . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.19 7.52 7.45 1.0Montana . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.02 7.25 6.00 17.3Nebraska. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.18 5.66 5.54 2.2Nevada. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.45 5.66 6.62 16.9NewHampshire. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.82 5.27 5.91 12.2NewJersey . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.26 5.17 5.44 5.3NewMexico. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.72 6.17 5.71 7.5New York . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.40 5.82 5.64 3.0NorthCarolina. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.60 8.81 8.09 8.2NorthDakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.34 5.96 5.92 0.7Ohio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.66 8.17 7.76 5.1Oklahoma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.40 7.95 7.96 0.1Oregon. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.57 5.99 5.38 10.1Pennsylvania . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.10 7.29 7.65 5.0Rhode Island . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.24 6.46 6.22 3.6SouthCarolina . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.77 9.46 8.32 **12.1SouthDakota . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.22 6.98 6.88 1.4Tennessee. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.11 8.77 8.65 1.3Texas. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.60 6.55 6.19 **5.4Utah . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.32 4.52 5.12 13.3Vermont . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.46 6.49 5.68 12.4Virginia. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.91 7.47 7.10 5.0Washington . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.20 5.07 4.70 7.3WestVirginia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.38 8.16 7.07 13.3Wisconsin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.64 6.54 6.37 2.5Wyoming. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.72 6.63 6.78 2.2** Significantatp

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    6/32

    6 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010

    age)(TablesAandB).In2006,theneonatalmortalityratewas4.46deathsper1,000livebirths,essentiallyunchangedfromthepreviousyear (4.54). The 2006 postneonatal (28 days to under 1 year)mortality rateof2.22was4percent lower than the2005 rate (2.32)butwasnotsignificantlydifferentfromthe2004rate(2.25)(2004and2005datanotshown).

    The neonatal mortality rate for infants of non-Hispanic blackmothers(8.95)wasmorethantwicethoseforinfantsofAIAN(4.30),non-Hispanic white (3.64), API (3.18), Mexican (3.73), Central andSouth American (3.12), and Cuban women (3.60) (Figure4). TheneonatalmortalityrateforPuertoRicanwomen(5.44)wasthesecondhighest after that for non-Hispanic black women. Neonatal mortalityratesdidnotdeclinesignificantlyforanyraceorethnicgroupin2006from2005 (datanotshown).

    Infantsofnon-Hispanicblack(4.40)andAIAN(3.98)mothershadthehighestpostneonatalmortalityratesofanygroupmorethantwicethatfornon-Hispanicwhitewomen(1.94)(Figure4).Thepostneonatalmortality rate forPuertoRicanwomen (2.57)was32percenthigherthanfornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.Incontrast,postneonatalmortalityratesforMexican(1.61),API(1.37),andCentralandSouthAmericanwomen(1.41)were1729percent lowerthanfornon-Hispanicwhitewomen (Figure4; TablesA and B). Postneonatal mortality ratesdeclined in 2006 from 2005 for non-Hispanic white (2.05 to 1.94,respectively)andMexican(1.75to1.61,respectively)women;ratesforother race and Hispanic origin groups were essentially unchanged(2005datanotshown).Periodofgestation

    Thegestationalageofan infant isperhaps themost importantpredictor of his or her subsequent health and survival. Infants borntoosmalland toosoonhaveamuchgreaterriskofdeathandbothshort- andlong-termdisabilitythanthosebornatterm(3741weeksofgestation),andthepercentageofpretermbirthshasbeenlinkedtovariations in infant mortality rates betweencountries (1621). Infant

    0

    30

    60

    90

    120

    150

    QuadrupletTripletTwinSingletonAllpluralities

    Rateper1,0

    00livebirths

    6.86 5.87

    27.92

    69.63

    146.48

    Includes quintuplet and higher order births not shown separately.

    SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

    Figure3. Infantmortalityrates,byplurality:UnitedStates,2006

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10 Neonatal

    Centraland

    SouthAmerican

    CubanMexicanAmericanIndian orAlaskaNative

    TotalPuertoRican

    NonHispanic

    black

    Rateper1,0

    00livebirths

    NonHispanic

    white

    Asian orPacific

    Islander

    Postneonatal

    Includes persons of Hispanic and nonHispanic origin.

    SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

    Difference between neonatal and postneonatal is not significant.

    8.95

    4.40

    5.44

    2.57

    4.46

    2.22

    4.303.98

    3.73

    1.61

    3.64

    1.94

    3.60

    1.42

    3.18

    1.37

    3.12

    1.41

    NS

    Figure4.Neonatalandpostneonatalmortalityrates,byraceandethnicityofmother:UnitedStates,2006

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    7/32

    7NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010mortality rates are highest for very preterm (less than 32 weeks)infants, and the risk decreases sharply with increasing gestationalage(1620).In2006,theinfantmortalityrateforverypreterminfants(175.94)was74timestherateof2.39forterminfants(TableE).Themortalityrateforinfantsbornat3233weeksofgestationwas16.19,nearlyseven times the rate for term infants.Althoughmortality fallswith increasinggestationalage,even infantsbornonlya fewweeksearly have a substantially increased risk of death when comparedwith term infants (2224). In 2006, the infant mortality rate for latepreterm infants (3436weeksofgestation)was7.08, 2.9 times therate for term infants. Even within the term period, infants born at3739 weeks of gestation had mortality rates that were 28percenthigher than those for infants born at 4041 weeks of gestation(Tables1and2).

    Becauseof theirmuchgreaterriskofdeath, infantsbornatthelowest gestational ages have a large impact on overall U.S. infantmortality.Forexample, infantsbornverypretermaccounted foronly2percentofbirthsbutmorethanone-halfofallinfantdeaths(54percent)intheUnitedStatesin2006(TableE).Conversely,infantsbornat37weeksofgestationormoreaccountedfor87percentofbirthsbut32percentof infantdeaths.Afteraplateaufrom2000to2005,theinfantmortalityrateforverypreterminfantsdeclinedby4percentin2006from2005.In2006,theinfantmortalityrateforverypreterminfantswas175.94,comparedwith

    183.24in2005and180.95in2000(TableE).Changesin2006from2005forotherspecificgestationalagecategorieswerenotstatisticallysignificant.

    Therewerelargedifferencesinthepercentageofpretermbirthsby raceandethnicity,and thesedifferenceshavea large impactoninfantmortalityrates(15,25).In2006,thepercentageofpretermbirthsranged from10.9percentofbirths toAPImothersto18.5percentofbirthstonon-Hispanicblackmothers(Tables4and5).Thepercentageofpretermbirths in theUnitedStateshasbeen increasingsince themid-1980s(2).Aportionoftheincreaseisrelatedtoariseinmultiplebirths (in part due to growth in the use of assisted reproductivetechnologies),althoughthepercentageofpretermbirthshasalsorisenforsingletons(2).Changesinthemedicalmanagementofpregnancy(i.e.,increasesincesareansectionandinductionoflaborforpreterminfants)mayhavealsohadan impact(2,12,22,2628).

    Somedifferencesoccurredingestationalage-specificinfantmortalityratesbyraceandethnicity(Tables1and2).Infantmortalityratesweresignificantlyhigherfornon-Hispanicblackthanfornon-Hispanicwhitemothersforthegestationalagecategorieslessthan32weeks,3436weeks,3741weeks,and42weeksormore.Whencomparedwithnon-Hispanicwhitemothers,infantmortalityrateswerehigherforAIANmothersat3436weeksand3741weeksofgestation,whileinfantmortalityrateswerehigherforPuertoRicanmothersatlessthan32weeksofgestation. Comparedwith non-Hispanicwhitemothers,

    TableE. Infantmortalityrates,andpercentdistributionof livebirthsand infantdeaths,byperiodofgestation:UnitedStates,20002006 linked files

    Preterm (less than37weeks)Very Late

    All preterm preterm Term Post-termgestational Total (less than 3233 (3436 (3741 (42weeks

    Year ages1 preterm 32weeks) weeks weeks) weeks) ormore)Infantmortality rate1

    2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.68 35.15 175.94 16.19 7.08 2.39 2.802005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.86 36.55 183.24 16.69 7.30 2.43 2.662004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.78 36.56 182.47 16.06 7.32 2.39 2.872003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.84 37.21 188.24 16.42 7.12 2.42 2.882002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.95 37.86 186.39 17.63 7.66 2.48 3.072001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.84 36.94 181.00 17.62 7.32 2.54 2.952000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.89 37.88 180.95 17.37 7.96 2.59 2.91

    Percentdistributionof infantdeaths22006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 68.1 54.3 4.0 9.8 29.5 2.42005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 68.6 54.9 3.9 9.8 29.1 2.32004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 68.3 54.7 3.8 9.7 29.1 2.72003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 68.1 55.0 3.8 9.3 29.2 2.72002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 67.3 53.7 4.0 9.7 29.6 3.02001

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    100.0

    66.1

    52.8

    3.8

    9.0

    30.9

    3.0

    2000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 65.6 52.0 3.7 9.4 31.2 3.2

    Percentdistributionof livebirths22006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 12.8 2.0 1.6 9.1 81.5 5.72005 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 12.7 2.0 1.6 9.1 81.4 5.82004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 12.5 2.0 1.6 8.9 81.3 6.22003 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 12.3 2.0 1.6 8.8 81.3 6.42002 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 12.1 2.0 1.5 8.6 81.2 6.72001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 11.9 1.9 1.5 8.4 81.2 6.92000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0 11.6 1.9 1.5 8.1 81.1 7.31Infantmortalityratesaredeaths less than1yearper1,000 livebirths inspecifiedgroup.2Infantdeathsandbirthswithnotstatedgestationalagearesubtracted from the totalnumberofeventsusedasdenominators forpercentagecomputations.

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    8/32

    8 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010infantmortalityrates forAPImotherswere lowerat3436weeksofgestation; for Mexican mothers, infant mortality rates were lower at3741 weeks of gestation; and for Central and South Americanmothers,infantmortalityrateswereloweratbothlessthan32weeksand3741weeksofgestation.Birthweight

    Birthweight is another important predictor of infant health. It iscloselyassociatedbutdoesnotexactlycorrespondwiththeperiodofgestation. Infant mortality rates are highest for the smallest infantsand decrease sharply as birthweight increases. In 2006, infantmortalityratesweremuchhigherforlowbirthweight(lessthan2,500grams) infants(55.38per1,000)thanfor infantswithbirthweightsof2,500 grams or more (2.24) (Table1). The infant mortality rate forvery low birthweight (less than 1,500 grams) infants was 240.44,more than 100 times the rate for infants with birthweights of 2,500grams ormore. When detailed birthweight categoriesareexamined(Table6), 85percent of infants with birthweights of less than 500grams(1 lb.1oz.or less)diedwithinthefirstyearof life.Reportingofdeathsamongtheseverysmallinfantsmaybeincomplete(29).Aninfants chances of survival increases rapidly with increasing birth-weight: Infant mortality rates were lowest at birthweights of3,0004,999grams.

    Becauseoftheirmuchhighermortalityrates,infantsbornatthelowestbirthweightshaveasubstantialimpactonoverallinfantmortalityrates. For example, infants born weighing less than 1,000 gramsaccountedforonly0.7percentofbirthsbutnearlyone-halfofallinfantdeaths (48.0percent) in theUnitedStates in2006 (tabulardatanotshown).Conversely,91.7percentofinfantsbornintheUnitedStatesin2006weighed2,500gramsormore,buttheseinfantsaccountedforlessthanone-thirdofinfantdeaths(31.0percent).ThelargeraceandHispanic-originvariationsinthepercentageofbirthsatlowbirthweight(less than 2,500 grams)from 6.6percent for Mexican mothers to14.0percentfornon-Hispanicblackmothersmeanthatsomeraceorethnicgroupsaredisproportionatelyimpactedbythehighinfantmortality rates for lowbirthweight infants (Tables4and5).

    From2000to2006,infantmortalityratesforthetotalpopulationdeclinedby10percentforinfantsweighing1,0001,249gramsandby814percentforinfantsweighing1,5003,999gramsatbirth(Table6).Changesforotherdetailedbirthweightcategorieswerenotstatisticallysignificant.

    Fornon-Hispanicwhitewomen from2000 to2006,birthweightspecificinfantmortalityratesdeclinedforspecificbirthweightcategories(1,0001,249gramsand2,0003,499grams),whilefornon-HispanicblackandHispanicwomen,declinesweresignificant for infantswithbirthweights of 2,5003,999 grams. No significant changes for anydetailedbirthweightcategorywereobservedforAIANandAPIwomen.TheinfantmortalityratesforseveralraceandHispanicorigingroupsdeclined foroneorbothof thesummarycategories less than2,500gramsor2,500gramsormore(Table6).Prenatalcare

    This report includes data on the timing of prenatal care basedonlyonthe12statesthathadimplementedthe2003RevisiontotheU.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirthasofJanuary1,2005(2).The2003revisionof thebirthcertificate introducedsubstantivechanges

    in item wording and to the sources of prenatal information (seeMethods and Technical Notes). Accordingly, prenatal care databasedon the2003and1989 revisionsarenotdirectlycomparable.Only ratesbasedon the2003 reviseddataareshown in thisreport(seeTableII, TechnicalNotes).

    The timingandqualityofprenatalcare receivedby themotherduringpregnancy is important to the infantssubsequenthealthandsurvival (3033). Early comprehensive prenatal care can promotehealthierpregnanciesbyprovidinghealthbehavioradviceaswellasearlydetectionandtreatmentofriskfactorsandsymptoms(30,31).Theinitiationandsubsequentutilizationofprenatalcareisalsoviewedasan indicator foraccess tocare(33).Maternalage

    Infantmortalityratesvarywithmaternalage:Infantsofteenagemothers(9.78)andmothersaged40yearsandover(8.01)havethehighestrates.Thelowestratesareforinfantsofmothersintheirlatetwentiesandearly thirties(Tables1and2).

    In 2006, among births to teenagers, infants of the youngestmothers(under15years)hadthehighestmortalityrate(18.14).Therateforinfantsofmothersaged1517was10.42,a9-percentdecreasefrom2005(11.40);therateforinfantsofmothersaged1819was9.30in2006comparedwith9.60in2005(tabulardatanotshown);andtherateforinfantsofmothersaged2024decreased4percentfrom7.86in2005 to7.55 in2006.

    Withinracialandethnicsubgroups,amonggroupsforwhichratescould be reliably computed, infant mortality rates for births to non-Hispanic white mothers under age 20 years were higher than formothersaged40andover.Incontrast,forMexicanmothers,ratesforbirths to the oldest women were higher than rates for infants ofteenagers.Maternaleducation

    Information on educational attainment in this report is drawnfrom the 12 states that had implemented the 2003 U.S. StandardCertificateofLiveBirthasofJanuary1,2005(2).The formatof theeducation item on the 2003 revised birth certificate substantivelydiffers from that of the unrevised (1989) standard certificate (seeMethods and Technical Notes). Only rates based on the 2003revised data are shown in this report (see TableII, TechnicalNotes).

    Infant mortality rates are known to decrease with increasingeducational levels, which may reflect socioeconomic differences;womenwithmoreeducationtendtohavehigherincomelevels(9,34).Livebirthorder

    Infantmortalityratesweregenerallyhigherforfirstbirthsthanforsecondbirths,and thengenerally increasedasbirthorder increased(Tables1and2).Overall,theinfantmortalityrateforfirstbirths(6.69)was14percenthigherthanforsecondbirths(5.89).Therateforfifthandhigherorderbirths (10.13)was 72percenthigher than the rateforsecondbirths.Thehigherparitiesandthereforethehighest-orderbirths (fifth child and above) are more likely to be associated witholdermaternalage,multiple births,and lowersocioeconomic status(2,35).

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    9/32

    9NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010Maritalstatus

    Maritalstatusmaybeamarker for thepresenceorabsenceofsocial,emotional,andfinancialresources(36,37).Infantsofmotherswhoarenotmarriedhavebeenshown tobeathigher risk forpooroutcomes (38,39). In 2006, infants of unmarried mothers had aninfantmortalityrateof9.19per1,000,80percenthigherthantheratefor infants of married mothers (5.11) (Tables1 and 2). Within eachrace and Hispanic origin group, infants of unmarried mothers hadhigherratesofmortality,andwith theexceptionofAIANandCubaninfants, thesedifferencesweresignificant.Nativity

    In 2006, the infant mortality rate for mothers born in the 50statesandtheDistrictofColumbia(7.03)was38percenthigherthantherateformothersbornelsewhere(5.09)(Figure5;Tables1and2).Among race and Hispanic origin groups for whom infant mortalityrates could be calculated, except for Puerto Rican, Cuban, andCentralandSouthAmericanmothers,mothersborn in the50statesand the District of Columbia had higher infant mortality rates thanmothersbornelsewhere(Tables1and2).

    Avarietyofhypotheseshavebeenadvancedtoaccountforthelowerinfantmortalityrateamong infantsofmothersbornoutsidethe50statesandtheDistrictofColumbia, includingpossibledifferencesinmigrationselectivity,socialsupport,andriskbehaviors(40,41).Also,womenbornoutsidethe50statesandtheDistrictofColumbiahave

    been shown to have different characteristics than their U.S.-borncounterpartswithregardtosocioeconomicandeducationalstatus(42).Maternalsmoking

    Informationonsmokingduringpregnancyinthisreportisbasedonthe2003revisionofthebirthcertificate,whichdifferssubstantivelyfrom that of the unrevised (1989) standard certificate (2). For the2006linkedfile,reviseddataareavailablefor11ofthe12statesthatrevised their certificates as of January 1, 2005; Florida revised thecertificate but had a noncomparable question (see Methods andTechnical Notes). Only rates based on the 2003 revised data areshown in thisreport(seeTableII, TechnicalNotes).

    Tobaccouseduringpregnancycausesthepassageofsubstancessuchasnicotine,hydrogencyanide,andcarbonmonoxide from theplacenta into the fetal blood supply. These substances restrict thegrowinginfantsaccesstooxygenandcanleadtoadversepregnancyandbirthoutcomessuchas lowbirthweight,pretermdelivery, intrauterine growth retardation, and infant mortality (43,44). Maternalsmoking has also been shown to increase the risk of respiratoryinfectionsand inhibitallergic immune responses in infants (45,46).Leadingcausesof infantdeath

    Infantmortality rates for the five leadingcausesof infantdeatharepresented inTable7byraceandHispanicoriginofmother.Theleading cause of infant death in the United States in 2006 was

    0

    3

    6

    9

    12

    15 Born in the U.S.

    Centraland

    SouthAmerican

    CubanMexicanAmericanIndian orAlaskaNative

    TotalPuertoRican

    NonHispanic

    black

    Rateper1,0

    00livebirths

    NonHispanic

    white

    Asian orPacific

    Islander

    Born elsewhere

    13.54

    10.01

    8.35

    NA

    7.56

    8.70

    7.03

    5.09

    5.92

    4.985.59

    4.04

    5.76

    4.19

    5.304.76

    4.994.43

    NS

    NSNS

    Includes persons of Hispanic and nonHispanic origin.

    SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

    Difference between born in the U.S. and born elsewhere is not significant.Not applicable, for mothers born elsewhere there are fewer than 20 infant deaths.

    Figure5. Infantmortalityrates,bymothersplaceofbirthandraceandethnicityofmother:UnitedStates,2006

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    10/32

    10 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010Congenitalmalformations,deformationsandchromosomalabnormalities(congenitalmalformations),accountingfor21percentofallinfantdeaths.Disordersrelatingtoshortgestationand lowbirthweight,notelsewhere classified (low birthweight) was second, accounting for17percent of all infant deaths, followed by Sudden infant deathsyndrome (SIDS) at 8percent of infant deaths. The fourth and fifthleading causesNewborn affected by maternal complications ofpregnancy (maternalcomplications), followedbyAccidents (unintentional injuries)accounted for 6percent and4percent, respectively,of all infant deaths in 2006. Together the five leading causesaccounted for56percentofall infantdeaths in theUnitedStates in2006.Theorderof the top four leadingcauseswas thesameas in2005. The fifth leading cause of death in 2006 was unintentionalinjuries, which was ranked sixth in 2005. Newborn affected bycomplicationsofplacenta,cordandmembranes(cordcomplications)was fifth in2005butdropped tosixth in2006. Infantmortality ratesfor the five leadingcausesdidnotchangesignificantly in2006 from2005,exceptformaternalcomplications,whichdeclinedby8percentin2006 fromayearearlier(2005datanotshown).

    In2006,therankorderofleadingcausesof infantdeathvariedsubstantially by race and Hispanic origin of the mother. Congenitalmalformations was the leading cause of infant death for all groupsexceptfornon-HispanicblackandPuertoRicanwomen,forwhomlowbirthweightwas the leadingcause.

    When differences between cause-specific infant mortality rateswereexaminedbyraceandethnicity,infantmortalityratesfromCongenitalmalformationswere38percenthigher fornon-Hispanicblackand20percenthigherforMexicanthanfornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.InfantmortalityratesfromCongenitalmalformationswere14percentlower forAPI than fornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.

    Infantsofnon-Hispanicblackmothershad thehighestmortalityratesfromlowbirthweight.Theratefornon-Hispanicblackmotherswasnearlyfourtimestheratefornon-Hispanicwhitemothers.TherateforPuertoRicanmotherswasmorethantwicetheratefornon-Hispanicwhitemothers.

    SIDS rates were highest for AIAN and non-Hispanic blackmothers2.1 and 1.9 times those for non-Hispanic white mothers,respectively. As most SIDS deaths occur during the postneonatalperiod,thehighSIDSratesforinfantsofnon-HispanicblackandAIANmothers accounted for much of their elevated risk of postneonatalmortality.Comparedwithnon-Hispanicwhitemothers,SIDSrateswere54percent lower for Mexican mothers, 59percent lower for APImothers, and 73percent lower for Central and South Americanmothers.

    Formaternalcomplications(e.g., incompetentcervix,prematureruptureofmembranes,andmultiplepregnancy,amongothers),infantsof non-Hispanic black mothers had the highest mortality rates2.8times those fornon-Hispanicwhitemothers.Rates forPuertoRicanmotherswere74percenthigherthanfornon-Hispanicwhitemothers.Infantsofnon-HispanicblackandPuertoRicanwomenhaveamuchhigherpercentageoflowbirthweight(Tables4and5),whichmayhelptoexplain theirhigher infantmortality rates frommaternalcomplications, as this cause occurs predominantly among low birthweightinfants.Infantmortalityratesfrommaternalcomplicationswere26percentlowerforAPIand52percentlowerforCentralandSouthAmericanwomen than fornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.

    ForAIANwomen,infantmortalityratesfromunintentionalinjurieswere triple those for non-Hispanic white women. For non-Hispanicblackwomen,ratesfromunintentional injuriesweredoublethosefornon-Hispanic white women. Infant mortality rates from unintentionalinjurieswere47percentlowerforMexicanand50percentlowerforAPIwomen than fornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.

    An examination of cause-specific differences in infant mortalityratesamongraceandHispanicorigingroupscanhelpinunderstandingoveralldifferences in infantmortality ratesamong thesegroups.Forexample, 29percent of the elevated infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic black mothers, when compared with non-Hispanic whitemothers,canbeaccountedforbytheirhigherratefromlowbirthweight,and7percentbydifferencesinmaternalcomplications.Inotherwords,ifnon-Hispanicblackinfantmortalityratesforthesetwocausescouldbereducedtothelevelsfornon-Hispanicwhiteinfants,thedifferencein the infant mortality rate between non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanicwhitemotherswouldbereducedby36percent.

    ForAIAN mothers, 24percent of their elevated infant mortalityrate, when compared with non-Hispanic white mothers, can beaccountedforbytheirhigherSIDSrateand19percentbydifferencesinunintentional injuries.Thus, ifAIAN infantmortalityrates forthesetwocausescouldbereducedtonon-Hispanicwhitelevels,thedifferenceintheinfantmortalityratebetweenAIANandnon-Hispanicwhitemotherswouldbe reducedby43percent.

    Similarly,37percentofthedifferencebetweenPuertoRicanandnon-Hispanic white infant mortality rates can be accounted for bydifferencesinlowbirthweightand10percentbydifferencesinmaternalcomplications. Thus, if Puerto Rican infant mortality from these twocausescouldbereducedtonon-Hispanicwhitelevels,thedifferencein the infant mortality rate between Puerto Rican and non-Hispanicwhite infantswouldbereducedby47percent.Preterm-relatedcausesofdeath

    In order to more fully assess the impact of preterm birth oninfant mortality, CDC researchers have developed a grouping ofpreterm-related causes of death. A cause of death is consideredpreterm related if75percentormore of infantswhose deathswereattributedtothatcausewerebornatlessthan37weeksofgestation,and the cause of death was a direct consequence of preterm birthbasedonaclinicalevaluationand reviewof the literature(47,48).

    Thisgroupingwasdevelopedbecause it isdifficult,using traditionalanalysesof the leadingcausesof infantdeath, toassess theoverall impactofpreterm-related infantdeathson infantmortality. Inparticular,thecategoryofDisordersrelatedtoshortgestationandlowbirthweight, not elsewhere classified, includes the phrase not elsewhere classified, indicating that many other preterm-related infantdeathsareclassified toothercause-of-deathcategories.

    The comprehensive list of preterm-related cause-of-death categories(ICD10codes)isshownintheTable8footnote.Notethateventhis more comprehensive listing probably underestimates the totalimpactofpreterm-related infantdeath,assomecause-of-deathcategories(notablythosebeginningwiththewordsotherandallother)hadahighpercentageofpreterm infantdeathsbut lackedsufficientspecificitytobeabletoestablishtheetiologicconnectiontoprematuritywithanydegreeofcertainty.

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    11/32

    NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010 11Table8shows trends inpreterm-related infantmortalityby race

    andHispanicoriginofmotherfrom2000to2006.Ofthetotal28,509infantdeathsintheUnitedStatesin2006,10,303werepretermrelated.In 2006, 36.1percentofall infantdeaths in the United Stateswerepreterm related, slightly lower than in 2005 (36.5percent), but still4percenthigher than in2000 (34.6percent).

    The impactofpreterm-related infantdeathsvariedconsiderablybymaternalraceandethnicity.In2006,45percentofinfantdeathstonon-Hispanicblackwomenand41percentofinfantdeathstoPuertoRicanwomenwereduetopreterm-relatedcauses,whilepercentagesweresomewhat lower forother raceandethnicgroups (Table8).

    Preterm-relatedinfantmortalityratesvariedconsiderablybyraceand ethnicity of the mother (Figure6 and Table8). Preterm-relatedinfant mortality rates were 3.4 times higher for non-Hispanic black(6.01)thanfornon-Hispanicwhitemothers(1.79).Infact,in2006thepreterm-related infant mortality rate for non-Hispanic black motherswashigherthanthetotalinfantmortalityratefornon-Hispanicwhite,Mexican,CentralandSouthAmerican,andAPIwomen.ThepretermrelatedinfantmortalityrateforPuertoRicanwomen(3.30)was84percenthigherthanfornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.Preterm-relatedinfantmortalityratesforAPI(1.49)andCentralandSouthAmerican(1.52)womenweresignificantly lower than fornon-Hispanicwhitewomen.Changes inpreterm-related infantmortality rates in2006 from2005were not statistically significant except for API women, who had a14percentdecline inpreterm-related infantmortality.

    Aswiththeleadingcausesofdeath,itispossibletocomputethecontributionofpreterm-related infantmortality toraceandethnicdifferences in infant mortality rates.Thus,54percent of the difference

    betweenthenon-Hispanicblackandnon-Hispanicwhiteinfantmortalityrates isduetopreterm-relatedcauses.Ifpreterm-related infantmortalityfornon-Hispanicblackwomencouldbereducedtonon-Hispanicwhite levels, thedifference in the infantmortality ratebetweennon-Hispanicblackandnon-Hispanicwhitemotherswouldbereducedby54percent.

    Similarly,forPuertoRicanwomen,62percentofthedifferenceininfantmortalityratescomparedwithnon-Hispanicwhitewomenisdueto differences in preterm-related causes of death, and reducingpreterm-relatedinfantmortalityforPuertoRicanwomentothelevelsfor non-Hispanic white women would lower the difference in ratesbetweenthetwogroupsbythesamepercentage.Inadditiontohelpingtoexplaindifferencesininfantmortalityratesbetweenvariousgroups,comparisons such as these can be helpful in targeting preventionefforts.

    References1. National Center for Health Statistics. Public-use data file documenta

    tion:2006period linkedbirth/infantdeathdataset [online].Hyattsville,MD.Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htm.

    2. MartinJA,HamiltonBE,SuttonPD,etal.Births:Finaldata for2006.Nationalvital statistics reports;vol57 no 7. Hyattsville, MD: NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2009.

    3. Heron M, Hoyert DL, Murphy SL, et al. Deaths: Final data for 2006.Nationalvitalstatisticsreports;vol57no14.Hyattsville,MD:NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2009.

    0

    3

    6

    9

    12

    15 Total

    Centraland

    SouthAmerican

    MexicanAmericanIndian orAlaskaNative

    TotalPuertoRican

    NonHispanic

    black

    Rateper1,0

    00livebirths

    NonHispanic

    white

    Asian orPacific

    Islander

    Pretermrelated

    13.35

    6.01

    8.28

    2.10

    8.01

    3.30

    6.68

    2.42

    5.58

    1.79

    5.34

    1.71

    4.55

    1.49

    4.52

    1.52

    Preterm-related deaths are those where the infant was born preterm (before 37 completed weeks of gestation) with the underlying cause of death assigned to one of the following

    International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision catagories: K550, P000, P010, P011, P015, P020, P021, P027, P070P073, P102, P220P229, P250P279, P280, P281, P360P369,

    P520P523, and P77; see Technical Notes.

    Includes persons of Hispanic and Non-Hispanic origin.

    SOURCE: CDC/NCHS, National Vital Statistics System.

    Figure6.Totalandpreterm-related infantmortalityrates,byraceandethnicityofmother:UnitedStates,2006

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/VitalStatsOnline.htm
  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    12/32

    12 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,20104. World Health Organization. International statistical classification of

    diseases and related health problems, tenth revision. Geneva: WorldHealthOrganization.1992.

    5. RosenbergHM,MaurerJD,SorliePD,etal.Qualityofdeathratesbyrace and Hispanic origin: A summary of current research, 1999.NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.VitalHealthStat2(128).1999.

    6. NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.U.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirth. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03finalACC.pdf.2003.7. Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ. Characteristics of births to single- andmultiple-race women: California, Hawaii, Pennsylvania, Utah, andWashington, 2003. National vital statistics reports; vol 55 no 15.Hyattsville,MD:NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2007.

    8. TomashekKM,QinC,HsiaJ,IyasuS,BarfieldWD,FlowersLM.Infantmortality trends and differences between American Indian/AlaskaNative infantsandwhite infants in theUnitedStates,19891991and19982000.AmJPublicHealth96:22227.2006.

    9. Singh GK, Kogan MD. Persistent socioeconomic disparities in infant,neonatal, and postneonatal mortality rates in the United States,19692001.Pediatrics119:e928e39.2007.

    10. AmericanCollegeofObstetriciansandGynecologists.Multiple gestation: Complicated twin, triplet, and high-order multifetal pregnancy.ACOGpracticebulletin;no56.Washington,DC.October2004.11. AyresA, JohnsonTRB.Management ofmultiplepregnancy:PrenatalcarePart1.ObstetGynecol60;52737.2005.

    12. Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology andcausesofpretermbirth.Lancet371:7584.2008.

    13. Blondel B, Kogan MD, Alexander GR, et al. The impact of theincreasingnumberofmultiplebirthson theratesofpretermbirthandlowbirthweight:Aninternationalstudy.AmJPublicHealth92:132330.2002.

    14. MacDormanMF,MartinJA,HoyertDL,etal.Explaining the200102infant mortality increase: Data from the linked birth/infant death dataset. National vital statistics reports; vol 53 no 12. Hyattsville, MD:NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2005.

    15. LukeB,BrownMB.Thechangingriskof infantmortalitybygestation,plurality, and race: 198991 versus 19992001. Pediatrics118:248897.2006.

    16. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M. Neurologic anddevelopmental disability at six years of age after extremely pretermbirth.NEnglJMed352:919.2005.

    17. FanaroffAA,StollBJ,WrightLL,etal.Trendsinneonatalmorbidityandmortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol196:147.e18.2007.

    18. Costello DW, Friedman H, Minich N, et al. Improved neurodevelopmentaloutcomes forextremely lowbirthweight infants in20002002.Pediatrics119:3745.2008.

    19. Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J. Intensive care for extremeprematurityMoving beyond gestational age. N Engl J Med358:167281.2008.20. SaigalS,DoyleLW.Anoverviewofmortalityandsequelaeofpretermbirth from infancy toadulthood.Lancet371:26169.2008.

    21. MacDorman MF, Mathews TJ. Behind international rankings of infantmortality: How the United States compares with Europe. NCHS databrief, no 23. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.2009.

    22. DavidoffMJ,DiasT,DamusK,etal.Changes in thegestationalagedistributionamongU.S.singletonbirths:Impactonratesoflatepretermbirth,1992 to2002.SeminPerinatol30:815.2006.

    23. McIntireDD,LevenoKJ.Neonatalmortalityandmorbidityratesinlatepreterm births compared with births at term. Obstet Gynecol111:3541.2008.

    24. TomashekKM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK,Davidoff MJ, Petrini JR. Differences inmortality between late-pretermand termsingleton infants intheUnitedStates,19952002.JPediatr151:4506.2007.

    25. SchempfAH,BranumAM,LukacsSL,SchoendorfKC.Thecontributionofpretermbirthtotheblack-whiteinfantmortalitygap,1990and2000.AmJPublicHealth97(7):125560.2007.

    26. BettegowdaVR,DiasT,DavidoffMJ,DamusK,CallaghanWM,PetriniJR. The relationship between cesarean delivery and gestational ageamongU.S.singletonbirths.ClinPerinatol35(2):30924.2008.27. Sunderam S, Change J, Flowers L, et al. Assisted reproductivetechnologysurveillanceUnitedStates,2006.MMWR58(SS05):125.2009.

    28. Martin JA, Kirmeyer S, Osterman M, Shepherd RA. Born a bit tooearly: Recent trends in late preterm births. NCHS data brief, no 24.Hyattsville,MD:NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2009.

    29. Paulson J, Ramsini W, Conrey E, et al. Unregistered deaths amongextremely low birthweight infantsOhio, 2006. MMWR 56: 11013.2007.

    30. Kirkham C, Harris S, Grzybowski S. Evidence-based prenatal care:Part 1. General prenatal care and counseling issues. Am FamPhysician71:130716.2005.

    31. CramerME,ChenLW,RobertsS,CluteD.Evaluating thesocialandeconomic impact of community-based prenatal care. Public HealthNurs24(4):32936.2007.

    32. ConwayKS,DebP.Isprenatalcarereallyineffective?Or,isthedevilin thedistribution?JHealthEcon24:489513.2005.

    33. VintzileosAM,AnanthCV,SmulianJC,ScorzaWE,KnuppelRA.Theimpact of prenatal care on neonatal deaths in the presence andabsenceofantenatalhigh-riskconditions.AmJObstetGynecol186(5):10116.2002.

    34. U.S.BureauoftheCensus.PINC04.EducationalattainmentPeople18 years old and over, by total money earnings in 2008, workexperience in 2008, age, race, Hispanic origin, and sex. Currentpopulation survey, 2009 annual social and economic supplement.Available from: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htm.2009.

    35. Bai J, Wong FWS, Bauman A, Mohsin M. Parity and pregnancyoutcomes.AmJObstetGynecol186(2):2748.2002.

    36. McNamaraTK,OravEJ,Wilkins-HaugL,ChangG.Socialsupportandprenatalalcoholuse.JWomensHealth15(1):706.2006.

    37. Feldman PJ,Dunkel-SchetterC,SandmanCA,Wadhwa,P.Maternalsocial support predicts birth weight and fetal growth in humanpregnancy.PsychosomMed67:71525.2000.

    38. JoomaN,BorstellJ,ShenkangY,TahnerA,VuH. Infantmortality inLouisianaIdentifying the risks. J La State Med Soc February;153:8591.2001.

    39. Raatikainen K, Heiskanen N, Heinonen S. Marriage still protectspregnancy.BJOG112(10):14116.2005.

    40. Singh GK, Miller BA. Health, life expectancy, and mortality patternsamongimmigrantpopulationsintheUnitedStates.CanJPublicHealth95(3):I1421.2004.

    41. Liu KL, Laraque F. Higher mortality rate among infants of U.S.-bornmotherscomparedtoforeign-bornmothers inNewYorkCity.JImmigrMinorHealth8(3):2819.2006.

    42. Acevedo-GarciaD,SoobaderM,BerkmanLF.Thedifferentialeffectofforeign-bornstatusonlowbirthweightbyrace/ethnicityandeducation.Pediatrics115:2030.2005.

    43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequencesofsmoking:Areportofthesurgeongeneral.Atlanta:Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention, Office on Smoking and Health.2004.

    44. DelpishehA,AttiaE,DrammondS,BrabinBJ.Adolescentsmoking inpregnancyandbirthoutcomes.EurJPublicHealth16:16872.2006.

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdfhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstables/032009/perinc/new04_019.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/birth11-03final-ACC.pdf
  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    13/32

    NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010 1345. NoakesPS,HaleJ,ThomasR,LaneC,DevadasonSG,PrescottSL.

    Maternal smoking is associated with impaired neonatal toll-likereceptor-mediated immuneresponses.EurRespirJ28:7219.2006.

    46. Le SoufPN.Adverseeffectsofmaternalsmokingduringpregnancyon innate immunity in infants.EurRespirJ28:6757.2006.

    47. CallaghanWD,MacDormanMF,RasmussenSA,etal.Thecontribution of preterm birth to infant mortality rates in the United States.Pediatrics118:156673.2006.

    48. MacDorman MF, Callaghan WM, Mathews TJ, Hoyert DL, KochanekKD. Trends in preterm-related infant mortality by race and ethnicity,UnitedStates,19992004. IntJHealthServ37:63541.2007.

    49. BuehlerJW,PragerK,HogueCJR.Theroleof linkedbirthand infantdeath certificates in maternal and child health epidemiology in theUnitedStates.AmJPrevMed19(1S):311.2000.

    50. National Center for Health Statistics. 2003 revision of the U.S.StandardCertificateofLiveBirth.Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htm.2003.

    51. NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.Reportof thePanel toEvaluatetheU.S.StandardCertificatesandReports.Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/panelreport_acc.pdf.2000.

    52. NationalCenterforHealthStatistics.Technicalappendix.Vitalstatisticsof

    the

    United

    States,

    2003,

    vol

    I

    natality.

    Hyattsville,

    MD.

    2005.

    Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdf.53. Office of Management and Budget. Race and ethnic standards for

    federal statistics and administrative reporting. Statistical Policy Directive15.May12,1977.

    54. OfficeofManagementandBudget.Revisionstothestandardsfortheclassification of federal data on race and ethnicity. Fed Regist62FR5878158790.October30,1997.Available from:http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/rewrite/fedreg/ombdir15.html.

    55. JohnsonD.Codingandeditingmultiple raceandethnicity.Presentedatthe2004jointmeetingofNAPHSISandVSCP.Portland,OR.June610,2004.Available from:http://www.naphsis.org/index.asp?downloadid=75.

    56. AlexanderGR,AllenMC.Conceptualization,measurement,anduseofgestational age. I. Clinical and Public Health Practice. J Perinatol16(1):53B9.1996.

    57. NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.Computeredits fornatalitydata,effective1993. Instructionmanual,part12.Hyattsville,MD.1995.

    58. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital statistics, instructions forclassifying the underlying cause of death. NCHS instruction manual;part2a.Hyattsville,MD:PublicHealthService.Publishedannually.

    59. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Statistics, instructions forclassifyingmultiplecausesofdeath.NCHSinstructionmanual;part2b.Hyattsville,MD:PublicHealthService.Publishedannually.

    60. Israel RA, Rosenberg HM, Curtin LR.Analytical potential for multiplecause-of-deathdata.AmJEpidemiol124(2):16179.1986.

    61. National Center for Health Statistics. 2006 mortality multiple causepublic-use

    data

    file

    users

    guide.

    Hyattsville,

    MD.

    2009.

    Available

    from:

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/Record_Layout_2006.pdf Accessed:10/27/2009.

    62. World Health Organization. Manual of the International StatisticalClassification of Diseases, Injuries, and Causes of Death, NinthRevision.Geneva.1977.

    63. AndersonRN,MinioAM,HoyertDL,RosenbergHM.Comparabilityofcause of death between ICD9 and ICD10: Preliminary estimates.Nationalvitalstatistics reports; vol 49 no2.Hyattsville,MD:NationalCenter forHealthStatistics.2001.

    64. NationalCenterforHealthStatisticsDataWarehouse.Comparabilityofcause-of-deathbetween ICDrevisions.Available from:http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/comparability_icd.htm.2008.

    65. National Center for Health Statistics. ICD10 cause-of-death lists fortabulatingmortalitystatistics,effective1999.NCHSinstructionmanual:part9.Hyattsville,MD:PublicHealthService.1999.

    66. Brillinger DR. The natural variability of vital rates and associatedstatistics.Biometrics42:693734.1986.

    ListofDetailedTables1. Infant mortality rates, live births, and infant deaths, by selected

    characteristics and race of mother: United States, 2006 linkedfile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

    2. Infant mortality rates, live births, and infant deaths, by selectedcharacteristics and Hispanic origin of mother and by race ofmother for mothers of non-Hispanic origin: United States, 2006l inked file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17

    3. Infant mortality rates, by race and Hispanic origin of mother:United States and each state, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, andGuam, 20042006 linked files . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20

    4. Percentage of live births with selected maternal and infantcharacteristics, by race of mother: United States, 2006 linkedfile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    5.

    Percentage

    of

    live

    births

    with

    selected

    maternal

    and

    infant

    characteristics,byHispanicorigin ofmotherand raceofmotherfor mothers of non-Hispanic origin: United States, 2006 linkedfile. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21

    6. Live births and infant, neonatal, and postneonatal deaths andmortality rates, by race and Hispanic origin of mother andbirthweight:UnitedStates,2006linkedfile,andpercentchangeinbirthweight-specific infantmortality,20002006 linked files. . . . . 22

    7. Infant deaths and mortality rates for the five leading causes ofinfantdeath,byraceandHispanicoriginofmother:UnitedStates,2006 linked file . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25

    8. Number and percent of preterm-related infant deaths andpreterm-related infantmortalityrates,byraceandHispanicoriginofmother:UnitedStates,20002006 linked files. ... . ... . .. 26

    http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/panelreport_acc.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/rewrite/fedreg/ombdir15.htmlhttp://www.naphsis.org/index.asp?downloadid=75http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/Record_Layout_2006.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/comparability_icd.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/panelreport_acc.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdfhttp://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/rewrite/fedreg/ombdir15.htmlhttp://www.naphsis.org/index.asp?downloadid=75http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/dvs/Record_Layout_2006.pdfhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/mortality/comparability_icd.htmhttp://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/TechApp03_1-09.pdf
  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    14/32

    14 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010Table1. Infantmortalityrates, livebirths,and infantdeaths,byselectedcharacteristicsandraceofmother:UnitedStates,2006 linked file

    RaceofmotherAmerican

    All Indianor AsianorCharacteristic races White Black AlaskaNative Pacific Islander

    Infantmortalityratesper1,000 livebirths inspecifiedgroupTotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.68 5.57 12.90 8.28 4.55

    AgeatdeathTotal neonatal. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4.46 3.71 8.67 4.30 3.18

    Earlyneonatal (less than7days). . . . . . . . 3.55 2.95 6.93 3.29 2.56Lateneonatal(727days). . . . . . . . . . . . 0.91 0.77 1.74 1.03 0.63

    Postneonatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.22 1.85 4.23 3.98 1.37Sex

    Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.31 6.12 13.91 9.54 5.09Female. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.02 4.98 11.84 6.96 3.98

    PluralitySingle births. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.87 4.87 11.39 7.84 3.96Plural births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.07 25.57 52.18 26.38 24.32

    BirthweightLess than 2,500 grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55.38 50.10 72.95 54.71 38.55

    Less than1,500grams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240.44 228.21 269.15 227.56 206.821,5002,499grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14.11 13.95 15.09 18.81 11.04

    2,500 grams or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.24 2.06 3.33 4.49 1.50Periodofgestation

    Less than32weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 175.94 162.26 208.41 139.88 160.223233 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16.19 15.83 17.11 * 16.913436 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.08 6.61 9.11 9.69 5.273741 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.39 2.17 3.68 4.85 1.65

    3739 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.58 2.34 3.96 4.79 1.744041 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.02 1.84 3.06 5.05 1.46

    42 weeks or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.80 2.65 3.83 * 2.09Ageofmother

    Under 20 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.78 8.30 13.94 8.83 9.512024 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.55 6.26 12.72 8.45 5.402529 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.95 4.99 11.94 8.28 4.093034 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.32 4.46 12.96 7.67 3.393539 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.09 5.14 13.73 6.68 5.284054 years. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.01 6.92 14.88 * 7.80

    Livebirthorder1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.69 5.61 13.15 7.82 4.252 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.89 5.08 11.14 6.87 4.213 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.39 5.24 12.33 7.79 5.004 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7.78 6.30 13.80 10.61 7.025 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10.13 7.88 16.97 12.86 7.57

    MaritalstatusMarried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.11 4.68 10.71 7.28 4.17Unmarried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    9.19

    7.33

    13.82

    8.82

    6.48

    Mothersplaceofbirth

    Born in the50statesandD.C. . . . . . . . . . . 7.03 5.66 13.36 8.35 5.76Born elsewhere. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.09 4.82 8.65 * 4.19See footnotesatendof table.

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    15/32

    NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010 15Table1. InfantUnitedStates, mortalityrates, livebirths,2006 linked fileCon. and infantdeaths,byselectedcharacteristicsandraceofmother:

    Characteristic Allraces

    Raceofmother

    White BlackAmericanIndianor

    AlaskaNative AsianorPacific Islander

    Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sex

    Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    PluralitySinglebirths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Plural births . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    BirthweightLess than2,500grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    Less than1,500grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,5002,499grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    2,500gramsormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not stated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    PeriodofgestationLess than 32 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3233 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3436 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3741 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    3739weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4041 weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    42 weeks or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not stated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    AgeofmotherUnder 20 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2024 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2529 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3034 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3539 years

    . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    4054 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    Livebirthorder1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not stated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    MaritalstatusMarried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Unmarried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

    MothersplaceofbirthBorn

    in

    the

    50

    states

    and

    D.C.

    . . . . . . . . . .

    Bornelsewhere . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Not stated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . See footnotesatendof table.

    4,265,5932,184,2602,081,333

    4,121,964143,629

    353,46064,456

    289,0043,911,038

    1,095

    86,54768,579

    387,7913,456,4242,303,0211,153,403

    240,58925,663

    441,8341,080,4511,181,909

    950,267498,620

    112,512

    1,697,0001,354,418

    716,673288,771185,022

    23,709

    2,623,6231,641,970

    3,191,345

    1,058,70715,541

    3,310,3311,695,8861,614,445

    3,199,491110,840

    239,31040,366

    198,9443,070,169

    852

    55,75648,264

    285,8392,709,3291,792,662

    916,667190,709

    20,434

    311,948818,260935,936756,478399,118

    88,591

    1,312,3471,067,145

    563,322220,968131,031

    15,518

    2,206,7671,103,564

    2,545,857

    755,7138,761

    Live666,494339,844326,650

    641,86924,625

    90,94020,71070,230

    575,385169

    26,29416,12977,746

    508,501349,822158,679

    34,9592,865

    113,616213,884166,862104,123

    53,964

    14,045

    257,537189,937115,040

    53,64043,480

    6,860

    198,596467,898

    555,151

    105,6525,691

    births47,72024,30823,412

    46,5451,175

    3,601624

    2,97744,111

    8

    1,008874

    4,84837,29224,41012,882

    3,451247

    8,38516,44712,197

    6,7803,143

    768

    16,75412,947

    8,7254,6184,431

    245

    16,89230,828

    44,659

    2,952109

    241,048124,222116,826

    234,0596,989

    19,6092,756

    16,853221,373

    66

    3,4893,312

    19,358201,302136,127

    65,17511,470

    2,117

    7,88531,86066,91482,88642,395

    9,108

    110,36284,38929,586

    9,5456,0801,086

    201,36839,680

    45,678

    194,390980

  • 8/9/2019 National Vital Statistics Reports: Infant Mortality Statistics From the 2006 Period Linked Birth/Infant Death Data Set

    16/32

    16 NationalVitalStatisticsReports,Volume58,Number17,April30,2010Table1. Infantmortalityrates, livebirths,and infantdeaths,byselectedcharacteristicsandraceofmother:UnitedStates,2006 linked fileCon.

    RaceofmotherAmerican

    All Indianor AsianorCharacteristic races White Black AlaskaNative Pacific Islander

    InfantdeathsTotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28,509 18,422 8,595 395 1,097

    AgeatdeathTotalneonatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,041 12,292 5,778 205 766

    Earlyneonatal (less than7days) . . . . . . . 15,148 9,760 4,616 157 616Lateneonatal (727days) . . . . . . . . . . . 3,893 2,533 1,161 49 151

    Postneonatal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,468 6,130 2,818 190 331Sex

    Male . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,973 10,384 4,726 232 632Female . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12,536 8,039 3,869 163 465

    PluralitySinglebirths . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24,190 15,588 7,310 365 927Pluralbirths. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,319 2,834 1,285 31 170

    BirthweightLess than2,500grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19,576 11,989 6,634 197 756

    Less than1,500grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,498 9,212 5,574 142 5701,5002,499grams . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,078 2,776 1,060 56 186

    2,500gramsormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,779 6,331 1,918 198 333Notstated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 154 103 44 8

    PeriodofgestationLess than32weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,227 9,047 5,480 141 5593233weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,110 764 276 14 56 3436weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,746 1,890 708 47 1023741weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,272 5,888 1,871 181 332

    3739weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,937 4,198 1,385 117 2374041weeks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,335 1,690 485 65 95

    42weeksormore . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 674 505 134 11 24 Notstated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 481 329 127 1 24

    AgeofmotherUnder20years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,320 2,588 1,584 74 752024years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,156 5,124 2,721 139 1722529years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,036 4,669 1,992 101 2743034years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,058 3,376 1,349 52 2813539years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,039 2,053 741 21 2244054years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 901 613 209 8 71

    Livebirthorder1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11,345 7,359 3,387 131 4692 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,977 5,417 2,116 89 3553 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,583 2,949 1,418 68 1484 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,248 1,393 740 49 675 or more . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,874 1,033 738 57 46Notstated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 482 271 197 2 12

    MaritalstatusMarried . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,419 10,330 2,127 123