national health policy forum (3/25/11)
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Physician Employment
Greenville Hospital System University Medical Center
National Health Policy Forum Washington, DC March 25, 2011
Michael C. Riordan President and CEO
Greenville Hospital System
1. GHS Overview • Greenville Hospital System and University
Medical Group 2. Physician Employment
• Conceptual Continuum • Motivation
3. Quality and Operational Efficiency • What’s the impact?
4. Summary 2
Agenda
1. System Overview
Our Vision Transform health care for the benefit of the
people and communities we serve.
Our Mission Heal compassionately. Teach innovatively.
Improve constantly.
• 5 Campuses
• 1,268 beds
• 11 Specialty Hospitals • 746 bed Tertiary Care Center • More than 120 Practice Sites (and growing)
Bird’s Eye View
Baptist Easley Hospital
5
GHS: A Critical Community Resource
Academics • 174 medical residents and
fellows in 7 residency and 5 fellowship programs
• Half of USC medical students receive 3rd and 4th year training at GHS
• More than 1,350 nursing students receive part of their training at GHS each year (over 2.100 nursing student encounters yearly)
• Training for multiple allied health professions
FY ‘10 Actual
FY ‘11 Budget
Revenue* $1,346.1 $1,397.0
Expenses* $1,313.6 $1,376.0
Discharges 42,570 42,259
Patient Days
285,871 286,487
Outpatient Visits
2,107,575 2,367,661
6
Data Snapshot
*Millions
Quick Tour
Greenville Memorial Medical Campus
Greenville Memorial Medical Campus
• Greenville Memorial Hospital
• GHS Children’s Hospital
• Roger C. Peace Rehabilitation Hospital
• Marshall I. Pickens Hospital
• Cancer Center
• Medical Offices
• Institute for Advancement of Health Care
Patewood Medical Campus
-Outpatient Centers -Patewood Medical Offices -Patewood Memorial Hospital
GHS / Clemson University Translational Research Hub
Greer Medical Campus
Hospital, Medical Office Buildings, and long term care located on this site.
Cottages at Brushy Creek
One of just two such innovative skilled nursing facilities in the US offering residents a unique, home like experience. National award
for providing environments conducive to quality living.
• Hillcrest Memorial Hospital • Hillcrest Medical Offices
Simpsonville Medical Campus
• North Greenville Hospital - Long Term Acute Care • North Greenville Medical Offices
North Greenville Campus
Baptist Easley Hospital
50/50 Ownership
Continuing the Tour: University Medical Group
16
Specialty Physicians Specialty # MDs
Behavioral Medicine 13 Cardiology 30 Hospitalists 37 Neurology 5
Neurosurgery 6 OB/GYN 26
Ophthalmology 1 Ortho/Sports Medicine 28
Other Medicine Specialties 37 Otolaryngology 6
Pediatrics 78 Physiatry 8
Pulmonary 16 Radiology 39 Surgery 54 TOTAL 384
Primary Care Physicians Specialty # MDs
Family Practice 45 General Internal Medicine* 40
MD360 6 OB/GYN 25 Pediatrics 43
TOTAL 159
Source: UMG Master Physician File, dated 3.1.11
543 Total MDs
NOTE: These numbers do not include 111 non-MD providers
* Includes 3 Medicine/Pediatrics physicians
Employed Physicians University Medical Group
17
1994 1995 1998 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 # of Providers 69 104 145 320 396 454 559 647
Gross Revenue $90M $200M $232M $278M $358M $503M
Gross Collection Rate 36% 43% 46% 49% 49% 48%
Net Collection Rate 63% 86% 86% 88% 89% 89% Days in AR 168 53 47 43 37 35
% of GHS Admissions 35% 68% 82% 80% 83% 84%
Note: In addition to the above, GHS has mutually exclusive relationships with 134 physicians providing hospital based services: anesthesiology, emergency medicine, neonatology, and pathology.
University Medical Group Where Are We Now?
18
• GHSUMC has an open medical staff – 1,300 providers • Around 1990 began employing physicians
– Medical Education – Specialty programs (Trauma, specialty pediatrics, etc.) – Referral network (Partners in Health)
• Organized in 7 departments – Medicine, Surgery, Children's, Women's, Orthopaedics, and Community Medicine, Radiology
University Medical Group
19
Physician Employment
20
Physician Alignment Models
Fully Integrated Practice/Employment
Institute Member (Partial Employment)
Contract Affiliation
Joint Venture Arrangement
Mutual Project Development
Supportive participation in medical staff procedures and governance Neutral medical staff participation
Competitive position
Our Theory Physician
engagement increases as
relationships / connections
become stronger.
21
Conceptual Continuum
22
Affiliated
Engaged Physician Leaders Partner
Integrated Aligned
Employed
“Soft” “Hard”
Conceptual Continuum
23
Affiliated
Engaged Physician Leaders Aligned
Integrated Partner
Employed
“Soft” “Hard”
GHS Model
What is motivating physician practice acquisition at GHS
and why are physicians interested?
24
There exists the opportunity for physician groups to become part of something bigger
than they can be alone.
GHS Strategic Direction Physician Integration
25
Desired state is to get physicians to see the hospital as nothing more and nothing less than another part of their practice.
-- Spence Taylor, MD Chair, GHS Department of Surgery
The physicians and the hospital must recognize and share interdependent well-being.
Alignment is Not Enough
26
Desired state is to get physicians to see the hospital as nothing more and nothing less than another part of their practice.
-- Spence Taylor, MD Chair, GHS Department of Surgery
Benefits • Creates a structure that facilitates collaboration and
mutual commitment toward desired behaviors and outcomes: – Financial – cost savings as well as revenue – Higher Quality – Improved Patient Care and Satisfaction
The physicians and the hospital must recognize and share interdependent well-being.
Alignment is Not Enough
27
Integrated Delivery Model – Philosophy
Establishing a Culture of Shared Responsibility
with Engaged Physician Leadership
It’s About Much More than Economics...
28
• COMMUNITY: Fulfill our responsibilities as a Safety Net Hospital – improve access to and quality of care available in our community.
• TEACHING: To be the core faculty for LCME and ACGME accreditation processes
• INTEGRATION: To be known within and without the organization as the GHS physicians responsible for development of their specialty area AND to lead our QUALITY, PATIENT SAFETY, AND UTILIZATION INITIATIVES
• CONTRACTING: To offer a full slate of specialty physicians for third party contracting and grant applications
• FUTURE HEALTH CARE CHANGES: To present a full service integrated delivery system for CMS and insurers/payors involving regionalized health care delivery and risk-sharing by providers.
Why Do We Employ Physicians?
29
Why are Physicians Interested in Employment? • Environment that better allows them to do the things that
led them into medicine initially • Administrative Support = more time for patient care • Improved / Expanded Benefits
– Lower cost of malpractice coverage – Additional tax deferred retirement savings
• Affordable access to sophisticated EMR, billing systems and other large scale information systems
• Improved managed care contracting • Costs savings through vendor contracting • Access to funding for capital purchases • Opportunity to be part of something bigger (e.g.,
teaching, quality, highly integrated delivery system, etc.) 30
Impact on Quality and Operational Efficiency
Moving from physician employment to physician
engagement
31
Physician Engagement
• Board of Trustees (Physician leaders are voting members of Board Committees)
• GHS President’s Council (Executive Team includes key physician leaders)
• Operations Council (COO, VP Medical Services, CFO, Clinical Chairs, Campus Presidents)
• Physician Operations Council (Physician Executives, Clinical Chairs)
• • • Unit Leaders – Physician/Nurse Leader Partnership
32
Partnership/collaboration at all levels directed toward clinical and operational improvements.
University HealthSystem Consortium GHS: A Top Performer In Readmissions
©2011 University HealthSystem Consor>um 33
RESULTS
University HealthSystem Consortium GHS: Core Measures Results Are Outstanding
©2011 University HealthSystem Consor>um 34
AMI Composite
HF Composite
Pneumonia Composite
2009 99.5% 98.0% 96.2%
2010 97.0% 96.3% 95.8%
UHC Median (2010) 95.8% 89.5% 83.1%
NaConal Target 90% 90% 90%
Greenville Rank (2010) 31/106 13/109 11/110
RESULTS
Physician Engagement
Examples of Physician Leader Engagement • Supply Standardization • Length-of-Stay – Discharge Planning Process • Improving Operational Efficiency – Targeted DRGs • Utilization of Inpatient Radiology Services • Orthopaedics – Inpatient Process Improvements • Blood Conservation Initiative • Pharmaceutical Formulary Development
35
FY 2010 Result: $14 million in cost savings achieved.
University HealthSystem Consortium: GHS Now Top 10 In Efficiency
©2011 University HealthSystem Consor>um 36
• Adjusted cost/discharge declined in all major categories, 2009 to 2010
• Clinical portfolio intensification a significant contributor
• Total cost/discharge now 17% below UHC 25th percentile
• Supply cost/discharge now 12% below UHC 25th percentile
• Labor cost/discharge now 8% below UHC 25th percentile
RESULTS
Benefits of Physician Engagement
• Transparent and collective focus on clinical quality through development and adoption of evidence-based care protocols
• Collaborative/collegial opportunities to highlight unexplained physician practice variation
• Linking a strong organization bottom line to enhanced physician support for patient care
• Shared focus/unified goals foster relationship building and team approach among physicians, nurses, and administrators
• Fostering physician creativity in streamlining / maximizing quality, safety, and operational efficiency 37
Summary
38
• Future success for community-based academic medical centers will depend upon prioritizing patient care and competing by providing cost efficient, quality total health care.
• Such care likely can only be provided by regionalized integrated systems of health care.
• The key relationship is and will be that between the hospital and its highly engaged/employed physicians.
• GHS is becoming progressively positioned for success in the coming complex and tumultuous health care environment.
Summary
39
Summary
40
Our Core Belief GHS cannot effectively take responsibility for improved quality and reduced costs for the
governmental and private pay populations unless all parts of the health care continuum are highly
integrated.
• GHS is becoming progressively positioned for success in the coming complex and tumultuous health care environment…. Accountable Care Organization
• Challenges to moving toward highly integrated models include some legal/legislative restrictions including: • Stark Rules • Anti-Kickback and Civil Monetary Penalty Laws • Anti-Trust Regulations • Tax laws for non-profits dealing with private use and private
inurement
Summary
41