nasscom: safe city architecture framework

23
SAFE CITY ARCHITECTURE FOR SMART CITIES IN INDIA NASSCOM Confidential 1

Upload: hanhan

Post on 13-Feb-2017

237 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

SAFE CITY ARCHITECTURE FOR SMART CITIES IN INDIA

NASSCOM Confidential 1

Page 2: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Why Smart Cities should be Safe Cities?

NASSCOM Confidential 2

A Smart City must enhance performance on safety and security for citizens, their activities and investments, and the sustainability of the environment, to thrive as a city.

A ‘Safe’ city is a pre-requisite to create an attractive economic and social environment for the citizens, and to attract the investments for the growth of smart city.

With the integration of Smart citizen centric services with the Safety and Security infrastructure, the city would be able to ensure sustainability and socio-economic growth.

Page 3: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Objectives to be achieved through a safe city architecture for smart cities

NASSCOM Confidential 3

Pre-empt and secure smart city against terror strikes and other

extraordinary threats from extremist/radical elements

Provide efficient Incident Response to emergency situations (terror

incidents, fire, medical, crime, accidents of all types, etc.; this is distinct

from disaster management, which is a separate requirement)

Traffic Management and Road Accidents Management (Road

Accidents are the single largest cause of non-natural deaths)

Re-enforce Crime Prevention and Investigation capabilities of Policing

Agencies for ensuring security for communities and commerce (including

vulnerable communities such as children, elders, women, minorities, etc.)

Protection of Critical Infrastructure (including cyber-

attacks) (transport systems, utilities, government and public installations)

Social Unrest management and Law & Order management

Safety and security of (large scale) Public Events and Special Events

Page 4: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

ARCHITECTURE - Citizen Centric Services

NASSCOM Confidential 4

Page 5: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Safe Cities as well as Smart Cities have specialist components of

infrastructure whose availability create the potential for

architecting higher level services and capacities for enhancing

security and safety

Page 6: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 6

GREEN CITY

MOBILITY LIFESTYLE & HEALTH ENERGY GOVERNA

NCE SAFE CITY

Safe City ICT COMPONENTS

SAFE CITY SERVICES

SMART CITY

Policing Services

Incident Response

Traffic Management & Mass Transport System

Community Policing

Emergency and Disaster Management

Surveillance and Monitoring

Safety and Security of Critical Infrastructure

Security of Public Places and Events

These components being …..

Page 7: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

C4i, Fusion Centre & other analytical modules

Surveillance & Monitoring System

Police Tactical Operations Management & Communications (part of C4i)

Community Policing

Traffic Management

Incident Response

Recommended Implementation Priority & Criticality of Various Technology Components for Safety & Security in Smart Cities..

09-Feb-15 © ORKASH 7

Page 8: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Architecture – 4 layers

NASSCOM Confidential 8

SERVICES CONSUMPTION & INTERACTION LAYER

Sharing and collaboration

layer

DATA GENERATION

Using smart city and safe city infrastructure

BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL MODEL

Policing Services

Incident Response

Traffic Management & Mass Transport System

Community Policing

Emergency and Disaster Management

Surveillance and Monitoring

Page 9: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 9

Citizens Government

Crowd Sourcing Stakeholders & Citizens acting as Sensors by reporting and providing feedback

Accountability Layer

Service Providers

Corporates

Government

RWAs, NGOs and Local Bodies Corporates

INFORMATION FLOW

Providing the Rationale for Collaboration

The Accountability layer holds stakeholders responsible for the provision and implementation of services. This layer of Accountability, thus, provides Stakeholders with a rationale for collaborating.

Stakeholders

Stakeholder Collaboration across the Safe City Infrastructure and the Smart City Infrastructure is the key to enhancing security and safety

Page 10: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 10

CROWD SOURCING

Fusion and

Analysis

DATA COLLECTION

ANPR CCTV RFID

Sensors and other data sources

Town Planners

Government Agencies

Citizens

Private Organizations

Crowd Sourcing - Basic Model for Data Collation

Page 11: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Data Sharing Crowd Sourcing

NASSCOM Confidential 11

Government Ministries Civic Bodies Security

Agencies Emergency

Services Transport

Authorities

Policy Legal, Bureaucratic and Administrative

Issues Data Security

DATA GENERATION

SHARING & COLLABORATION

Challenges

Citizens

Page 12: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

SOLUTIONS

NASSCOM Confidential 12

Page 13: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 13

Areas where Intervention is required Policing Services – Crime, Vulnerable Sections, etc. through citizen engagement

Community Policing and Neighborhood Security

Efficient Incident Response

Traffic Management and Mass Transport Systems

Security of Public Places and Events

Emergency and Disaster Management

Security and Safety Surveillance and Monitoring

Safety and Security of Critical Infrastructure

Page 14: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS - Early Stage Smart Cities

NASSCOM Confidential 14

Page 15: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 15

Policing Services – Vulnerable Sections of Society

Citizen centric services for the safety of vulnerable sections of society include:

Women Children Senior Citizens

People with disabilities OR

health problems

Marginalized Communities

Identification and protection of the most vulnerable in the society to ensure that they are allowed to live free from abuse and neglect.

Community specific volunteer networks – AA, Women’s Groups

GPS Tracking using Mobile Phones, PDAs, Electronic Tags; linked to an alert system

Integrated Incident Response across Police, Fire, Health services

Community specific Mobile Apps for incident reporting

Panic Buttons in Public places

Page 16: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 16

It is a philosophy that promotes organizational strategies that encourage the use of partnerships and collaborative problem solving methodology between police and local communities to address pro-actively the immediate conditions giving rise to issues of public safety and security such as crime, social disorder, and conditions that lead to criminal or high-risk behaviour amongst sub-groups of vulnerable communities.

Community Policing

Increased interactions with and participation of the community

in Policing and Crime intervention processes

Non-intrusive collaborations of law enforcement agencies in

crime prone areas/community groups or for the protection of vulnerable, marginalized and

minority communities.

It involves two aspects –

RWAs Police

Social Media based Interactions

Page 17: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 17

INFORMATION FUSION & ANALYSIS

INFORMATION SOURCING

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION

MULTI-AGENCY COORDINATION

Safety and Security for Traffic and Mass Transport Systems

SMART AND SAFE TRAFFIC AND MASS TRANSPORT SYSTEM

ANPR CCTV RFID LBS

Page 18: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 18

Security of Public Places and Events Citizens of a city are often most vulnerable when in crowds at Public Places like markets, metro stations or Special Events like political rallies or concerts. Security at such places needs to be of a certain standard to ensure the complete safety of citizens. The components that are critical for this are:

Identification of risk hotspots

across the city

Crowd control infrastructure

Automatic alert systems

Emergency specific

evacuation plans for the public

Integrated Response across

teams

Centralized action plans in case of threats

Surveillance and Monitoring

networks at public places and events

Uniform & Mandatory Security Standards and Protocols for Public Facilities and Buildings

Page 19: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 19

Consolidated understanding of incident response

Resources Readiness

Coordinated information sharing

approach in the context of Multi-Agency Handling

Integrated all round view of an emergency

situation

Coordination between Emergency Response Services – Fire, Police,

Health Services – in situation handling

Integrated platform for dissemination of

critical information to the public

Utilization of information and

intelligence for Rapid and Informed incident

responsiveness

Leveraging the Citizen layer in times of Emergency and

Disaster situations to maximize spread of management efforts

SAFE SMART

CITY

RECOVER

Emergency & Disaster Management

Page 20: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NEXT STEPS

NASSCOM Confidential 20

Page 21: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

Business Model

NASSCOM Confidential 21

Technology Death Risk Area

Cost

/ Re

venu

es

Time

Grant

Basic R&D

Bridge Capital zone Blending and Financial engineering zone

Private Investment Zone: Loans, Venture Capital

Revenue

Costs

Demonstration Deployment

In case of the Smart Cities the projects’ financial cycle is characterized by a long gestation period.

Page 22: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

NASSCOM Confidential 22

Next Steps

MoUD needs to set minimum security standards for public places like: malls, airports, metro stations, market places etc.

Business cycle evaluation for Safety and Security – incorporating PPP

Key Performance Indicators to be framed for each service component

Address Legal and Policy challenges to Information Sharing and Multi-agency Coordination

Page 23: NASSCOM: Safe City Architecture Framework

END