nac human exploration and operations committee briefing ... · july 24, 2012 . status of the human...
TRANSCRIPT
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NAC Human Exploration
and Operations Committee Mr. Richard Kohrs, Chair
July 26, 2012
Agenda – July 23, 2012
2
*Status of International Space Station and Plans for Intravehicular Activity/Extravehicular
Activity Environmental Control and Life Support Systems
Dan Hartman
*Space Launch System/Orion
William Hill
Status of Mars Program Planning Group
Orlando Figueroa and Michele Gates
Joint Robotic Precursor Activities
Victoria Friedensen/Mike Wargo
Status of Forming Subcommittee on Space and Life Science/ Center for Advancement of
Science in Space (CASIS)
D. Marshall Porterfield
Agenda – July 24, 2012
Status of the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate
Bill Gerstenmaier
Commercial Orbital Transportation Services/Commercial Crew Development
Phil McAlister
Overview of Contracting Options
William McNally
3
Committee Members
• Present
– Richard "Dick" Kohrs, Chair
– Bohdan "Bo" Bejmuk, Vice Chair
– Shannon Bartell
– Nancy Ann Budden
– Stephen "Pat" Condon
– Tommy Holloway
– David Longnecker
– Richard "Dick" Malow
– James "Jim" Odom
• Not present
– Leroy Chiao
– Joseph "Joe" Cuzzupoli
– Robert "Bob" Sieck
4
5
International Space Station
Program Status
NAC July 23, 2012
Dan Hartman
Manager, Operations Integration
ISS Program
MRM2
MRM1
(SM
Zenith)
(FGB
Nadir)
DC-1/
MLM/
RS
SM-Aft
Node-2
Zenith
Node-2
Nadir
N2 Fwd
Po
rt Utiliz
atio
n
165 / 163
28S
4/27
193 / 191
29S
7/1
125 / 123
30S
5/17 9/17
120 / 118
31S
7/17 11/12
155 / 153
32S
10/17 3/19
161 / 159
33S
12/7 5/15
167 / 165
34S
4/4 9/16
170 / 168
35S
5/31 11/15
168 / 166
36S
10/2 3/17
168 / 166
37S
12/1
186 / 181
ATV3
9/25 168 / 158
ATV4
3/22 8/27 180 / 172
ATV5
3/8
3R (MLM)
12/19
HTV3
7/27 9/6
HTV4
6/15 7/15
SpX-D
5/25 5/31
SpX-1
10/7 10/31
SpX-2
12/17 1/16
SpX-3
7/20 8/19
SpX-4
10/9 11/8 Orb-D1
12/17 12/29
Orb-1
4/11 5/7 Orb-2
8/9 9/8
Orb-3
12/8 1/7
46Pj
4/19
47P
4/22 7/30
48P
8/2 12/25
49P
11/3 3/15
50P
12/28 2/1
51P
2/4 4/25
52P
4/28 7/29
53P
8/1 12/13
54P
10/25 3/6
55P
2/18
5/15 30S
N°705
7/15 31S
N°706
10/15 32S
N°707
12/5 33S
N°704A
4/2 34S
N°708
5/29 35S
N°709
9/30 36S
N°710
11/29 37S
N°711
TMA-11M
3/12 ATV4
2/28 ATV5
12/10 3R (MLM)
MLM
7/21 HTV3
6/10 HTV4
5/22 SpX-D
10/5 SpX-1
12/15 SpX-2
7/18 SpX-3
10/7 SpX-4
8/31 Orb-TF
12/12 Orb-D1
4/8 Orb-1
8/6 Orb-2
12/5 Orb-3
4/20 47P
N°415
8/1 48P
N°416
11/1 49P
N°417
12/26 50P
N°418
2/2 51P
N°419
4/26 52P
N°420
7/30 53P
N°421
10/23 54P
N°422
M-22M
2/16 55P
N°423
R-31
8/16
U-18
8/30
R-32
Apr
R-33
Jun
R-34
Aug
U-19
Aug
R-35,36
Oct
U-19, 20u/r
Dec
R-38
Jan
R -39,40
Feb
06/03 -06/13 08/03 -08/10 11/03 -11/10 12/31 -1/10 06/1 -06/11 08/1 -08/09 11/2 -11/10 12/30 -01/09
HTV3: MCE, SCAN TB
SpX-2: HRSGF (2)
HTV4: MBSU, UTA, STP-H4
SpX-3: HDEV, OPALS, NOFBX
Crew
Rotation
Stage EVAs
Stage S/W
Launch
Schedule
Solar Beta >60
External Cargo
3/31 38S
41 days 24 days
12 d
30 days 26 days 30 days 30 days
R-37
Nov
NASA Official: John Coggeshall
Prepared by: Scott Paul
Chart Updated: July 11, 2012
SSCN/CR: 13330 (Baseline)
For current baseline refer to
SSP 54100 Multi-Increment
Planning Document (MIPD)
#3-7 (Beta)
#3-8 #3-8
#3-72
#3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8 #3-8
MIPD CR 13306
7/22 7/24
#3-75 #3-75
3/13 – 3/27 ATV4
2/21 – 2/24 4/26 – 5/23 ATV4
4/12 -15 6/13 -16 6/24 – 7/22 ATV4
8/11-14 8/24-28
#3-7
#3-7 (Beta)
[2]
[1]
ISS Flight Plan Flight Planning Panel (FPP)
(Pre-decisional, For Internal Use, For Reference Only)
2012 2013 2014 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar
Inc Inc 31 Inc 32 Inc 33 Inc 34 Inc 35 Inc 36 Inc 37 Inc 38 In N (28S)
R (28S)
R (28S)
R Kononenko (CDR-31) (29S)
E Kuipers 193 days (29S)
N Pettit 193 days (29S)
R G. Padalka (CDR-32) 125 days (30S)
R S. Revin 125 days (30S)
N J. Acaba 125 days (30S)
N S. Williams (CDR-33) 120 days (31S)
R Y. Malenchenko 120 days (31S)
J A. Hoshide 120 days (31S)
N K. Ford(CDR-34) 155 days (32S)
R O. Novitskiy 155 days (32S)
R E. Tarelkin 155 days (32S)
C C. Hadfield (CDR-35) 161 days (33S)
R R. Romanenko 161 days (33S)
N T. Marshburn 161 days (33S)
R P. Vinogradov (CDR-36) 167 days (34S)
R Misurkin 167 days (34S)
N Cassidy 167 days (34S)
R F. Yurchikhin (CDR-37) 170 days (35S)
N K. Nyberg 170 days (35S)
A L. Parmitano 170 days (35S)
R O. Kotov (CDR-38) 168 days (36S)
R S. Ryazansky 168 days (36S)
N M. Hopkins 168 days (36S)
J K. Wakata (CDR-39) 168 days
N R. Mastracchio 168 days
R M. Tyurin 168 days
7
Recent Mission Accomplishments thru June 2012 (last 4 months)
Successful Vehicle traffic at the ISS
March/April : ATV-3 dock 3/28, 46P undock 4/19, 47P
docking 4/22, 28S undock 4/27
May/June : 30S Docking 5/19, SpaceX Demo berthing
5/25, SpaceX Demo unberth 5/31, 29S undock 6/30
July 17 31S docking
Successful demonstration of SpaceX Demo vehicle objectives
Track and capture, berthing, cargo operations, unberth
and release of first commercial vehicle to the ISS.
Averaged 35 hours/week for research last Increment
Continued checkout of Robonaut
Robotic Refueling Mission (RRM) operations part 2
AMS detected 19 billionth cosmic particle
Reacted to several system anomalies (JEM low temp pump,
CDRA sensors and valves, Water Processor leak, GPS box
failures)
Expedition 31 Crew
SpaceX Dragon, berthed at N2 Nadir
Transit of Venus as seen by
the ISS crew.
8
SCAN testbed
ACE-1
Mission Objectives July 2012 – October 2012
Support upcoming vehicle traffic : 47P undocking, re-rendezvous, docking,
and undocking, 48P docking, HTV3 berthing, 30S undock, HTV-3 unberth,
ATV-3 undock, SpaceX-1 berthing, 32S docking
Perform RS EVA #31 (MMOD shields on SM, launch Spherical Satellite, collect
[CКК] and Biorisk) and USOS EVA #18 (R&R MBSU1, route MLM cables,
install PMA2 cover), both scheduled in August
Transition to the WRS Water Recovery System (WRS) re-usable Advanced
Recycle Filter Tank Assembly (ARFTA), which reduces need for delivery and
disposal of consumables for nominal operations
New science delivered on HTV3 and 48P
Advanced Colloids Experiment-1 (ACE-1)
Aquatic Habitat
ISS SERVIR Environmental Research and Visualization System (ISERV)
Multi-mission Consolidated Equipment (MCE)
Plate Reader
Space Communications and Navigation (SCAN) Testbed
Small Sat Deploy Demo
YouTube Space Lab
Spacecraft Single Event Environments at High Shielding Mass
(HiMassSEE): HiMassSEE
Radiation Environment Monitor (REM)
We
ekl
y C
rew
Tim
e (
Ho
urs
)
Increment 31 / 32 Utilization Crew Time
3-Crew 6-Crew 3-Crew 6-Crew
Increment 31 Increment 32
May June July August Sept ATV3
SpX-D
9
HTV 3
Week 9 of 20, 45% through the Increment
USOS Allocation (IDRD) : 686 Hours
USOS Actuals : 334 Hours
Total USOS Average Per week : 37.1 Hours
0.00
100.00
200.00
300.00
400.00
500.00
600.00
700.00
800.00
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Cu
mu
lati
ve S
che
du
led
Cre
w T
ime
(H
ou
rs)
OOS Allocation US Scheduled 35 Hrs/Week Requirement
OOS Cumulative USOS Cumulative Scheduled
Biology and Biotechnology
Earth and Space Science
Educational Activities
Human Research
Physical Science
Technology
3 25 31 82 60*
ISS Research Statistics: Expeditions 31/32 (Working data as of May 31, 2012)
Expeditions 31/32 201 Investigations
• 123 new investigations
• 82 NASA-led investigations
• 119 International-led investigations
• Over 400 Investigators represented
• Over 500 scientific results publications (Exp 0–present)
Expeditions 0 – 28
• 1251 Investigations
• 475 NASA-led investigations
• 776 International-led investigations
• > 1300 scientists served
Expeditions 29/30
• 191 Investigations
• 85 NASA-led investigations
• 106 International-led investigations
• > 400 scientists served
10
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
CSA ESA JAXA NASA Roscosmos
Research Disciplines of ISS Investigations By Partner Agency: Expeditions 31/32
* Planned data. Still In Work.
SpaceX Demonstration
11
SpaceX Demonstration Mission
SpX Demo Mission successfully met all necessary ISS
cargo demonstration activities
Launched successfully on 5/22
Completed successful ISS Flyunder on 5/23
All free flyer demonstration requirements fully met
Performed berthing to ISS on 5/25
Delivered 525 kg of upmass to ISS and returned 665 kg of
downmass from the ISS
Returned high priority ISS cargo including a Contingency
Water Container – Iodine (CWCI) and a Space Integrated
GPS (Global Positioning System)/INS (Inertial Navigation
System) (SIGI)
Unberth conducted on 5/31 with de-orbit and splashdown
successfully completed on same day
Retrieval of Dragon capsule from Pacific Ocean completed on
5/31
Early destow demonstration successfully completed on 6/2
Nominal cargo handover to CMC was completed from
6/13 – 6/15
Final Post Flight Report delivery is planned for early August
(Return + 2 months)
12
SpaceX Demo successfully launched from LC40 on 5/22
Dragon on the barge after being retrieved from
Pacific Ocean on 5/31 Photo Credits: SpaceX
Orbital Demonstration Mission
Orbital Test/Demo Missions
Completion and turnover for operations of the Wallops Flight
Facility (WFF) launch pad is July
5K Cold flowTest Readiness Review (TRR) Phase 1
completed at WFF on 5/15; Phase 2 closeout planned
for 7/23
5K test planned following pad handover; 7K hot fire
test planned for 8/29
Test Flight vehicle:
Orbital projecting a NET 9/29 Test Flight launch of
Anteras
Main Engine System Integration to Stage 1 Core has
been completed
Demo:
ISS Program official launch date for Demo is 12/12,
with Orbital readiness NET 11/22
Cygnus Service Module Final Integrated System Test
(FIST) completion planned for mid-July
Safety Review Panel (SRP) Phase III meetings held on 5/23,
6/6, and 6/22 for the Collision Hazard Report
Additional reviews in July, with closeout in August
Software Stage Test (Joint Test 4) scheduled for 8/22-9/12 (dry
run completed)
Joint Multi-Segment Training simulations on-going
13
Test Flight Core and Engines in HIF being prepped for
Launch. Photo Credits: OSC
ISS Top Program Risk Matrix (Post June 07, 2012 PRAB)
14
Corrective/Preventative Actions
None L
I
K
E
L
I
H
O
O
D
5
4
3
2
1
1 2 3 4 5
CONSEQUENCE
Watch Items No Watch Items Elevated
Continual Improvement None
2 1
1 1 2
1 1 2
3 1
Low Medium High
C – Cost S –
Schedule
T –
Technical
Sa –
Safety
Top Program Risk (TPR)
Added 6370
Rescored 2810 & 6198
Risks (L x C)
Score: 5 x 5
6352 - Overlap in Commercial Crew & Soyuz Launch
Services - (OH) - (C,S,T,Sa)
Score: 5 x 4
6344 - ISS Operations Budget Reduction - (OH) - (C)
6370 - ISS Pension Harmonization - (OH) - (C)
Score: 4 x 4
5456 - ISS Budget and Schedule - (OH) - (C,S,T)
6169 - Visual Impairment / Intracranial Pressure - (SA) -
(C,S,T,Sa)
Score: 3 x 5
5688 - ISS Solar Array Management Operations Controls
and Constraints - (OM) - (C,S,T,Sa)
2810 - Russian Segment (RS) capability to provide
adequate MM/OD protection - (OM) - (C,S,T,Sa)
Score: 3 x 4
5184 - USOS Cargo Resupply Services (CRS) Upmass
Shortfall - 2010 through 2016 - (ON) - (C,S,T,Sa)
Score: 4 x 3
5269 - The Big 12 Contingency EVA's - (OB) - (S,T,Sa)
Score: 2 x 5
6262 - Potential USOS Nitrogen and Oxygen Resupply
Shortfall - (OB) - (C,S,T,Sa)
Score: 3 x 3
6096 - Urine Processing Function - (OB) - (T)
Score: 4 x 2
6347 - Temporary Urine and Brine Stowage System
Catastrophic leak of a Tox-2 Fluid - (OB) - (S,T,Sa)
Score: 2 x 2
6032 - On-Orbit Stowage Short-Fall (Pressurized Volume) -
(OC) - (T,Sa)
6093 - Oxygen Processing Function - (OB) - (C,T)
6198 - ODAR HRCS/ICU Cost Growth - SSCN#11372 - (OD)
- (C,S,T)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Exploration Systems Development Briefing to the NASA Advisory Council
Status of ESD, Orion, SLS, and GSDO
Bill Hill
23 July 2012
Orion/SLS Plan
• 2014 Exploration Flight Test 1
– Launch Orion capsule on Delta 4 Heavy with delta upper stage
– 2 hr mission to demonstrate 80% deep space return entry velocity
– No crew
• 2017 Exploration Mission (EM-1)
– 70 metric ton
– Lunar fly-by
– No crew
• 2021 Exploration Mission (EM-2)
– 70 metric ton
– Mission TBD
– Crewed
16
Orion EFT-1 Updates
17
Orion EFT-1 in route to NASA’s
Kennedy Space Center
Exploration Flight Test 1
18
SLS 70 Metric Tons: First Flight 2017
INITIAL CAPABILITY, 2017–21
70 t 321 ft.
Launch Abort System Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle
(MPCV)
Interim Cryogenic
Propulsion Stage (ICPS) • MPCV Stage Adapter
• Launch Vehicle Stage Adapter
19
Core Stage/Avionics
(Boeing)
5-Segment Solid
Rocket Booster (SRB)
(ATK)
Core Stage Engines (RS-25)
(Pratt & Whitney Rocketdyne)
SLS Evolvable Configurations and Characteristics
20
385 ft
315 ft
209 ft
0
SLS First Flight (Non-crewed) in 2017
70t - Block l crew
Initial Capability: 70-100
metric tons (t), 2017-2021
• Serves as primary
transportation for Orion and
exploration missions
• Provides back-up
capability for crew/cargo to
ISS
105 - Block lA cargo
Evolved capability:
105 t, post-2021
• Includes Advanced
Booster
• Allows incorporation
of any products from the
Adv. Development NRA
focusing on risk
reduction
105t - Block IA crew 130t_Block ll cargo
Evolved capability: 130 t,
post-2021
• Offers large volume for
science missions and
payloads
• Modular and flexible,
right-sized for mission
requirements
SLS Summary by Element: Risk Reduction Incorporated in Design
• Boosters (3-phased approach)
– Phase I: 5-segment Solid Rocket Booster in-scope modification to existing Ares contract with ATK for initial
flights through 2021
– Phases II and III: Advanced Boosters
o II: Engineering demonstration and risk reduction via NASA Research Announcement (NRA): Full and
Open Competition in FY12; award by FY13
o III: Design, Development, Test & Evaluation (DDT&E): Full and Open Competition (RFP target FY15)
• Stages
– Core/Upper Stage: Justification for Other Than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) to Boeing, modifying
current Ares Upper Stage contract
– Instrument Unit Avionics: In-scope modification to existing Ares contract with Boeing; consolidated with
Stages contract to Boeing
• Engines
– Core Stage Engine: 4 RS-25 engines per core; JOFOC to existing Space Shuttle contract with Pratt &
Whitney Rocketdyne (PWR)
– Upper Stage Engine: J-2X in-scope modification to existing Ares contract with PWR
– Future Core Stage Engine: Separate contract activity to be held in the future
• Spacecraft and Payload Adapter and Fairing
– Initial design: Adapter and Fairing design and development in-house through early design phase
– Fairing Full and Open Competition planned for FY13
21
22
FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16 FY17 FY18
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2
EFT-1 flt h/w EM-1 flt h/wProgress to date
Milestones are "complete"milestones unless noted
ESD Tri-Program Summary Schedule
Element
HEO / ESD
SLS
Booster
Core Stage
ICPS
Orion
Flight Article
GSDO
Veh. Integ. / LaunchOffline Proc. /CCC & Range
12/5
C-SRR C-SDR
Checkpoint
EFT-1
Checkpoint Checkpoint Checkpoint
EM-1Uncrewed
3/11
MCR
7/19
ASM
3/30
SRR/SDR
5/17brd reconvene
PDR CDR DCR
9/14
DM-3 BRR PDR QM-1 CDR
Production
DCR EM-1 H/W
10/17
ATP SRR/SDR PDR CDR Struct Test st. DCR
Production
Green Run Test st.
EM-1 H/W
3/26
Trade StudiesStart
IssueJFOC
Down Select Start Design
Production
StartProd EM-1 HW
6/18
PTR 2
11/17
PTR 3 SDR-Synch DAC POD/ERB
EFT-1 Flt. Art.Ready PDR-Synch (UR) CDR (UR) SAR
LAS
Comp Qual
Design CM STA AI&T TestVehicle on dock at KSC
SM AI&T
11/30
MCR SRR/SDR PDR CDR DCR ORD ORR
10/3
Pad InfrastructConst start
CoreC&C
ML Struct Mod Start
Veh IntCapa
VAB PlatformConstruct start
MPPF Fac.Construct
ML UmbInstall st.
Flame Deflect. Const. st.
RPSF Booster Ops ready
ML/VABV&V cmplt
ML/Pad V&V cmplt
ORD
Orion CSM, LV Fwd, LV Aft LV Core
Integ Ops (EM-1)to Pad
EFT-1 flt h/w EM-1 flt h/wProgress to date
Milestones are "complete"milestones unless noted
version: 120703 R0
For comments [email protected]
Discussion
• Silent on contract type
• Plan to review certification/verification of CCDEV contractor and NASA
activity at next meetings
• Briefing from outreach at next meeting
• Pursue civilian tourist on Commercial Crew
• Committee will review 7120.5 and discuss at next meeting
23
Recommendation to the NAC
• Name of Committee:
NAC HEO Committee
• Short Title of Recommendation:
Systems Integration
• Recommendation:
A small team of experienced integrators, led by an empowered, accountable
and responsible leader, should be established to ensure adequate integration
of the SLS, Orion and Ground System programs.
• Major Reason:
Integration between SLS, Orion, and Ground Systems programs requires
definition and implementation.
• Consequence of no action:
Due to the lack of adequate integration of the three programs, design and
configuration disconnects will be identified late resulting in cost overruns,
schedule slips and risk to mission.
24