mystical approach to self and no self: ‘being’ and ‘nothingness’ in meister eckhart and...

6
International Journal of Humanities and Religion (IJHR) www.humanitiesjournal.info Online ISSN: 2319-5630 Research Article December, 2012 IJHR, 1(2): 56 -61 56 Mystical Approach to Self and No Self: ‘Being’ and ‘Nothingness’ in Meister Eckhart and Heidegger Vanlal Tanpuia* and Archana Barua** Dept of Humanities and Social Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology, Guwahati, India *e-mail: [email protected]; **e-mail: [email protected] One of the most famous mystics of the Middle Ages Meister Eckhart, who is famous and at the same time notorious to Church authorities because of his so called radical theological outlook, speaks of the nothingness of the creatures in comparison with the ‘all light’ and ‘divinity ‘ in God. Given the metaphysical mode of thinking that prevails in the West during Eckhart’s time, he also speaks of Godhead, beyond the grasp of metaphysics, God as Godhead is beyond the God of metaphysics, beyond any name that the mind applies to him, beyond logical grasp and that way God is ‘nothing’ to the logical mind. When Eckhart speaks of Godhead, he means the God beyond the grasp of metaphysics. Godhead is the God of mysticism, for the true God cannot be comprehended by any conceptualizations. One can see that Heidegger’s way is similar to the mystical view expounded by Eckhart. Like the mystics way, Heidegger calls for a non-representational approach to Being and not a conceptual or rational determination of it. The way to Being is not through some ground or first principle as what metaphysics proposes. This article makes an attempt at comparing mystical elements in Heidegger’s thinking with a kind of mysticism that we come across in some Christian mystics like in Meister Eckhart from a phenomenological perspective. Key words: Mysticism, Being, Nothingness, Phenomenology INTRODUCTION To show how mystical approaches of certain Christian mystics like Meister Eckhart’s can match with Later Heidegger’s hermeneutical -phenomenological quest for Being, ‘the Self’ – or rather, ‘No self’, detachment, and indistinct union, is not at all an easy task. However, there is always a meaningful dialogue of explicating Heidegger’s mystical view of Being in the light of Eckhart’s mysticism since philosophers have observed that Heidegger’s calls for a non-representational approach to Being ,which he thinks is beyond a conceptual or rational determination of it,has some resemblance with Eckhart’s mysticism. The Being question was initially asked in the Aristotelian philosophy, but, for the German philosopher Martin Heidegger, traditionally (he claimed) ,the question remained a misdirected one in terms of aiming at something uncanny, independently real and permanent throughout in the midst of changes. Heidegger sought to reinterpret Ontology of Being in terms of the nothingness of Being, which appears to be more or less the same with Eckhartian mysticism. In fact, the prior readiness or meaningful settings of Being, which equally means the lack of man’s effort in the entire process of the disclosure Being, as for Heidegger, humans are only the clearing place of Being. Something like this seems to characterize Eckhart’s mystical approach to God wherein, the best thing that human can do is to patiently listen to the voice of such Being, rather than being active in the process of revealing the truth. In this background the first phase of the paper will endeavor to carry out the technical understanding of Heidegger’s so called ‘Mystical Approach’ in his late philosophy, especially the one that echoes some elements of Eckhartian mysticism, and the manner in which this has molded and inspired the non-representational Being of Heidegger. And the second part will culminate in a dialogue for explicating the possible mystical nature of the non- representative union with transcendental Being or Absolute Nothingness.

Upload: noorcasta

Post on 16-Aug-2015

10 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

by Vanlal Tanpuia and Archana Barua

TRANSCRIPT

International Journal of Humanities and Religion (IJHR) www.humanitiesjournal.info Online ISSN: 2319-5630 Research Article December, 2012IJHR, 1(2): 56 -6156 Mystical Approach to Self an No Self: !"ein#$ an !Nothin#ness$in Meister %c&hart an 'eie##er Vanlal Tanpuia* and rc!ana "arua**(ept of ')*anities an Social Sciences+ Inian Instit)te of ,echnolo#y+-).ahati+ Inia /e-*ail: 0an1iit#2ernet2in3 //e-*ail: archana1iit#2ernet2in One ofthe *ost fa*o)s*ysticsof theMileA#es Meister %c&hart+ .hoisfa*o)s an at thesa*e ti*e notorio)sto4h)rcha)thorities5eca)seofhissocalleraicaltheolo#icalo)tloo&+spea&softhe nothin#ness of the creat)res in co*parison .ith the !all li#ht$ an !i0inity ! in -o2 -i0en the *etaphysical *oeofthin&in#thatpre0ailsinthe6est)rin#%c&hart$sti*e+healsospea&sof-ohea+5eyonthe #rasp of *etaphysics+ -o as -ohea is 5eyon the -o of *etaphysics+ 5eyon any na*e that the *in applies to hi*+ 5eyon lo#ical #rasp an that .ay -o is !nothin#$ to the lo#ical *in2 6hen %c&hart spea&s of -ohea+he *eans the -o 5eyon the #rasp of *etaphysics2 -ohea is the -o of*ysticis*+ for the tr)e -o cannot 5e co*prehene 5y any concept)ali7ations2 One can see that 'eie##er$s .ay is si*ilar to the*ystical0ie.e8po)ne5y%c&hart29i&ethe*ystics.ay+'eie##ercallsforanon-representational approach to "ein# an not a concept)al or rational eter*ination of it2 ,he .ay to "ein# is not thro)#h so*e #ro)n or first principle as .hat *etaphysics proposes2 ,his article *a&es an atte*pt at co*parin# *ystical ele*entsin'eie##er$sthin&in#.itha&inof*ysticis*that.eco*eacrossinso*e4hristian*ystics li&e in Meister %c&hart fro* a pheno*enolo#ical perspecti0e2 Key words: Mysticis*+ "ein#+ Nothin#ness+ :heno*enolo#y I#TR$D%&TI$# ,osho.ho.*ysticalapproachesofcertain4hristian*ysticsli&eMeister%c&hart$scan*atch.ithLater 'eie##er$sher*ene)tical-pheno*enolo#ical;)estfor"ein#+!theSelf$5elie0esitis possi5le to pass 5eyon the sphere of lo#ical tho)#ht+ that is+ he 5elie0es it is possi5le not only to inferthat -o is+ 5)t that it is possi5le to feel+ to to)ch+ to 5eco*e act)ally one .ith -o2 @Mysticis* is one of those .ors+ li&e !reli#ion$ itself+ .hich .e all )se an to so*e e#ree )nerstan+ 5)t .hich pro0esiffic)lttoefineanthereforepro)cti0eofenless*ethoolo#icalisp)tes2A2Asital.aystal&sof so*ethin# )n)s)al h)*an e8perience+ there is a char#e especially fro* the lo#ical positi0ists that !*ysticis*$ is 5y efinitionsofoolishthattheonly.ise.orto5e)tterea5o)titisa.orofis*issal2@(espitethechar#e ho.e0er+ .e ha0e the 0irt)ally )nani*o)s teachin#s of the *ystics+4hristian an non-4hristian+that the#oal of the*ysticpath+5eit)nion.ith-o+the)ni0erse+orso*efor*ofconition+is5eyonthepo.erofh)*an concepts or speech to escri5e2A3 ,he *ystics ne0ertheless clai*e to ha0e attaine s)ch a 5lissf)l )nion+ .hich the h)*an ton#)e tr)ly cannot e8plain+ a perfect state anyho. for the*2 Mysticis*+ tho)#h acte as a ceaseless 5)rner of the ch)rch alters thro)#ho)t the ch)rch$s history ha oppresse #ro.thasit.asso*e.hatli*iteanprophesi7eonly.ithintheconstraintsofthech)rcha)thority2Borany inepenentorini0i)alteachin#o)tsieofthech)rch$sinfl)encestoo0)lnera5leto5etreateasheresy2A *ysticli&e%c&hart)ners)chcirc)*stances+.ho)ni;)elye*phasi7e)pontheineffa5le)nionorspirit)al *er#e .iththe -ohea 5eyon the ch)rch$s concept of ,rinitarian -o+ a#ainst.hich @the 5)ll iss)e 5y :ope Cohn DDII on April 15+ 1329+ !In a#ro o*inico$A is of no .oner2E

*&,HRT-) '()TI&. #$TI$# ,hef)na*entaltenetof%c&hart$steachin#+speciallyinter*sofhisfa*o)sistinction5et.eenthe*anifeste ,rinitarian -o an the -ohea+ is colore 5y the inner no5ility of each ini0i)al - the see of -o in the so)l2 Ans)chsee5ein#i*printe-o+ine0ita5lyleasonetosee-ointheen+e0entho)#htheso)lislost so*e.here else in life )ner the infl)ence of the 5oy or the .orl at lar#e2 ")t .hen the i0ine so)l *er#es .ith the -ohea < its *ain essence attains s)ch a 5lissf)l state that one is not a5le to escri5e it .ith the h)*an ton#)e an .ors2 S)ch a transcenental e8perience+ %c&hart says+ is achie0e 5eca)se a pri0ile#e position solely eri0e fro*the#reatnessof-o+asheer)ni;)e*anifestationof-ointheso)l+"eca)se-ore*ains5eyonthe #raspofrepresentationsone5y*[email protected]%c&hartspea&sof)nion.ith-o release *an2 !6ill less lettin# 5e !isthe state .hen theso)l si*ply lets the li#ht of -o thro)#hitself2 No other thin# enters or fills the life e8cept -o hi*self2 In the fa*o)s ser*on 52+ he says+ @"lesse Are the :oorA: @,herefore+ .e 5e# -o to #et ri )s of -o so that .e *ay #rasp an eternally enFoy the tr)th .here the hi#hest an#el an the fly an the so)l are e;)al2A %;)ally+ in the ser*onI3.erea:@6hen=theso)l>sees-oasheis-oorasheisfor*orashe isthree+there isso*ethin# inae;)atepresentinit35)t.henallfor*sareetachefro*theso)lanshe#a7esonly)pontheOnealone+ thenthep)re5ein#oftheso)lfinsthatit5earshieninitselfthep)refor*less5ein#ofi0ine)nitythatis 5ein# 5eyon 5ein#2A1E %c&hart tal&e a5o)t three &ins of po0erty that is : 1>!A*anhasnothin#$+5eca)se+$yo)s)rreneryo)r0ery5ein#to5efinallytr)e5ein#2as5ein#+asa creat)reso*ethin#otherthan-oisnothin#atall5eca)se+.hate0erithasis5orro.efro*!"ein#$< !-o$ li&e the .ay the air has li#ht+ as .hite thin# are .hite 5eca)se of .hiteness22>-oinheresinall2O)r5ein#isa5orro.e5ein#2Initselfthisselfisnothin#+thereforethisspirit)ally pooris etachefro* e0erythin#createan 5ac& fro* e0erythin# create an5ac& into 5ein#5eco*es li&e ho*e #oin# < -o to-o2 In ret)rn to )nion .ith -o .hich is -o+ @"lesse are the poor in spirit+ for theirs is the &in#o* of hea0en2A Jno.in#+ .illin#+ "ein# are s)rrenere in %c&hart2,he li5eration of the ini0i)al lies in theeffortto #i0e )p any istinction anto accept all thin#s as 5elon#in# to the one: @,hereforeitisinonenessthat-oisfo)n+anthey.ho.o)lfin-o*)stthe*sel0es5eco*e one2A15 3>!:oorinspirit&no.snothin#$2,hehi#hest&no.le#eofallisto&no.nothin#3)n&no.in#+a.holly )n&no.in#.hichNicholasof4)safollo.in#%c&hartcallealearne)n&no.in#-!ataignorantia< .hich is a .ay of learne in the .ay of -o2 "eca)se concept)al &no.le#e #i0es )s a *an *ae concept of-o+aniolatry2Itisnotthe-o.ho*.eha0ee0ise.itho)rtho)#ht+.ho*.esho)lsee&+ 5)ttheessential-o+-oin'is0ery"ein#2')*anpassi0ityhere+inter*sof.illan&no.le#eis orienteto.ars-o$sacti0ity2-ocannotspea&'is.orintheso)l%c&hartinsists2Itisso)lfille .ithitso.nisco)rse2'ence+theso)l*)stclearitselfofallnoise3it*)sts)spenallconceptsan i*a#esallspo&enan.ritten.orsthanalonecantheir%ternal.or5espo&en2Inate8tthatlater attracte the attention of 'eie##er+ %c&hart .rites that the so)l co*es to see .ith the sa*e eye in .hich -osees'i*self26hen%c&hartoespreachhisser*on+hisconcernisnotonlyof*oralanethical aspects5)talsoe8presseshisconcern.ithspirit)al.ell-5ein#+s)##estin#a*eitati0esta#e)rin# .hich the self can e8plore its inner or essential concerns an philosophical fra*e.or& of h)*an e8istence2 'eie##eralsospea&sa5o)tpo0ertyofspirit+anofnon-.illin#2'esaysinthe*istofpro)cti0ity+ tho)#ht pro)ces nothin#2Inthe *istof control tho)#ht isloro0ernothin#2In the *istof *asterin# theart+tho)#htisart5o)nan*ortal2,hetas&oftho)#htisnottoac;)irethepo.er.ith.hichto tra0eltothe*oonan5ac&3itistolearn+to.ellontheearth2Itsho)l5etorespontotheestiny .hich is )nfolin# in .estern history+ to ass)*e *astery o0er it2 In a sense+ in 'eie##er .e fin po0erty of tho)#ht is less than political an technolo#ical action2 ')*anity rests onhi#her estiny of "ein# itself2 ?anlal an Archana =2012>: Mystical Approach to Self an No Self: !"ein#$ An !Nothin#ness$ In Meister %c&hart an 'eie##erDecember, 2012 IJHR, 1(2) : 56-6160 'encein5oththephilosophiesof%c&hartan'eie##erthereisaco**onalityof.ill-lesness2In 'eie##er tho)#ht is al.ays tho)#ht of "ein#+ 5ein# as 5ein#+ 5rin#s itself to tho)#ht in *an3 it is 5ein#$s o.ntho)#htofhi*self+*anistho)#htless2Ofitselftho)#htri0esto.ars5ein#calc)latin#+ *anip)latin#+acc)*)latin#"ein#2Sotho)#htstansinneeofa#race.hich.illliftit)pan5rin#it 5ac& fro* its fol2 ")t it cannot 5e one 5y "ein#$s effort+ it is "ein#$s oin# in *an2 So this relationship is s)staine 5y "ein#2 "ein# #i0es itself to tho)#ht2 ,ho)#ht is to response the response to the #ift the #i0in# of than&s2 %c&hart states: @,hey =those .ho 5elie0e> *)st &no. that the 0ery 5est an no5lest attain*ent in this life is to 5e silent an let -o .or& an spea& .ithin2 6hen the po.ers ha0e 5een co*pletely .ithra.n fro* alltheir.or&sani*a#es+thenthe6orisspo&en2,hereforehesai:!Inthe*istofthesilencethe sacre .or .as spo&en )nto *e2$A16 ,o;)ote 'eie##er$s re*ar&s fro* his essay @,he :ath.ayA: @In the )nspo&en of speech+A accorin# to %c&hart+ @-o is first -o2A As 4ap)to s)**ari7es the parallel 5et.een %c&hart an 'eie##er:@6ith the Ken *asters+ he =%c&hart> a#rees that the (i0ine -ohea is )nerstoo only in a5sol)te silence an so+ on this point+ is nearer to Kenthanto'eie##er2")t+li&e'eie##er+heisconsiera5lyinteresteinlan#)a#eanishi*selfa*asterof -er*an0ernac)lar3asa4hristianheiseeplyinteresteintheSacreScript)res+an+*osti*portantly+inthe octrine of the !(i0ine .or2$A1I Apart fro* the infl)ence of %c&hart+ 'eie##er is also inspire 5y Niet7sche$s procla*ation of the !eath of -o$ .hichisac&no.le#easthecontin)ationoftraitionaltheolo#y2Altho)#h+'eie##eri*a&eat)rna.ay fro*theolo#y+yetitholsani*portantplaceinfor*)latin#hiso.nposition2Italso*eansf)rtherthatthe theolo#ythatis*at)rein'eie##erhasane.face.hich)neresti*atestheh)*anrepresentationofthe (i0ine Mystery2 It rather a0ocates the h)*an tho)#ht or 5ein# to 5e only the clearin# of the "ein# itself+ in .hich the.illof*aniss)5orinatetothe(i0ine6ill.hichis5)te8pressehereinter*sof"ein#$slan#)a#e2 'eie##er)nerstanstheh)*antho)#ht+asthecapacity.hichisa5letoreali7e"ein#$slan#)a#einsilenceG *eitation+aninline.ithMeister%c&hart3thes)5Fecti0ityof*anisnolon#eracti0e5)tpassi0etos)ch lan#)a#e2 "eca)se+ he later on fo)n that the 5est thin# that h)*an can o is to patiently listenin# to the lan#)a#e of "ein#2 "eca)se of its richness+ *any theolo#ians + incl)in# R)olf ")lt*ann to Jarl Rahner +ha0e appropriate *anyof 'eie##er$s insi#hts in orer to e0eloptheir o.n reli#io)s perspecti0es2 Lnfort)nately+ ho.e0er+ these theolo#ians ha0e less re*ar&e in istin#)ishin# the in#reients in 'eie##er$s thin&in# .hich pro0ie the fertile soilforthose5rea&thro)#hs26hen'eie##er*aea!,)rn$heiit5y)sin#a!'er*ene)tical$approachto reciprocate philosophy an theolo#y to a post-*etaphysical stance 19 6hatiscr)cialin'eie##erishist)rna.ayfro*the,heo-centrictheolo#y.hichinirectlyne#ate anthropocentricis* that pri0ile#es @*anAo0er all creat)res2'eacc)ses)ch*etaphysics of prioriti7in# h)*an .ill or tho)#ht to )n0eil the *ystery of "ein# G -o2 ")t this *o0e*ent on the contrary+ s)5orinates tho)#ht to lan#)a#e+ an there5y restores reli#io)s *eanin# thro)#h the #enesis of the *ost pri*orial lin#)istic #est)res2 In reFectin#the*etaphysicalientificationof5ein#="ein>.ith-o+'eie##eroesnotsi*plyta&eref)#eina @sec)lari7etheolo#y2ARather+hisphilosophyof5ein#safe#)arsaconcernforthei0ine*ystery5yin0itin# tho)#ht to e8plore the li*its of lan#)a#e+ an see&in# .hat is )ni;)e to the i0inities as *)ch in the *oality of their a5sence =#bwesenheit> as their presence2 #$T*) #D R*0*R*#&*):1(o.nes+ R2 62 =?ol 5E2 No 62 1920>2 Mysticis*2 $he %iblial world + 619-62E2 6Ki**er*an+ M2 %2 =1993>2 'eie##er+ ")his*+ an eep ecolo#y2 In 42 "2 -)i#non+ $he &ambridge &om'anion to Heidegger =pp2 2E0-269>2 4a*5ri#e Lni0ersity :ress2 2Mc-inn+"2=?ol2612No=Can19I1>>2,he-o5eyon-o:,heolo#yanMysticis*inthe,ho)#htofMeister %c&hart2 $he Journal of Religion + 1-192 3 I5i H I5i ?anlal an Archana =2012>: Mystical Approach to Self an No Self: !"ein#$ An !Nothin#ness$ In Meister %c&hart an 'eie##erDecember, 2012 IJHR, 1(2) : 56-6161 9 I5i 10 I5i 1E I5i 114lassen+ A2 =2003>2Meister %c&hart$s philosophy in the ,.enty-Birst cent)ry2 Mystics M)arterly+ 6 -23 5 %ncyclopeia "ritannica ERaler+42=?ol226=2006>>29osin#theSelf:(etach*entinMeister%c&hartanItsSi#nificancefor")hist- 4hristian (ialo#)e2 %uddhist ( &hristian "tudies + 111-11H2 I I5i 12 I5i 13 I5i 15 I5i 16Schalo.+B2=2001>2Heideggerand$he)uest*or$he"ared+*rom$houghttothe"antuaryof*aith. (orrechtG"ostonG9onon: Jl).er Acae*ic :)5lishers2 1H I5i 1I I5i (a0ies+ "2 62 =2010>2 ,artin Heidegger Key &one'ts. ()rha*: Ac)*en :)5lishin# 9i*ite2 'art+J2=19I9>2$he$res'assof$he"ign+!eonstrution+$heologyand-hiloso'hy.4a*5ri#eGNe.Nor&G:ort 4hesterGMel5o)rneGSyney: 4a*5ri#e Lni0ersity :ress2 C292Mehta2 =1990>2 -hiloso'hy and Religion+ .ssays in Inter'retation. Inian 4o)ncil of :hilosophical Research2 9an7etta+ "2 C2 =?ol2 H2+ No2 2 =Apr 1992>>2 ,hree 4ate#ories of Nothin#ness in %c&hart2 $he Journal of Religion + 2EI-26I2 )3urce 34 )upp3r5: Nil &3n4lic5 34 In5ere65: None (eclare2 'o. to 4ite:'alar+ "2 =2012>: I*pact of 6estern 4)lt)re on Inian Society .ith Special reference to Jrishna 4hanra "hattacharyya2 Inter2 C2 ')*anitiesO Reli#ion+ 1=2>: 56-61