mvusd aug 2011 day 1
TRANSCRIPT
Moreno Valley USD
Curriculum Development Academy
August 1-4, 2011
We will begin promptly at 8:30.
Please help yourself to coffee and snacks!
• At the end of the Academy, you will have
developed at least one standards-aligned
SMART Notebook lesson which includes direct
instruction, cognitively demanding interactive
activities, and meaningful responder-based
quizzes and polls, all specifically tailored to
the identified needs of your incoming
students.
Outcome
• Work collaboratively to create lessons and Notebooks in a supportive environment
• Plan and prioritize instruction based on student achievement data
Objectives
• Build and practice questioning strategies to engage students using the responders
• Expand and reinforce skills learned in the 101, 102 and advanced classes to better implement your Digital Math program
Objectives
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
1. Using Decision Making for Results process, identify student learning goal
2. Identify at least 2 resources or tools in SMART Notebook Gallery that support the goal
Today’s Outcome
•Respect
•Participation
•Results
Norms
•Discuss and clarify topics
• Individual reflection on personal responses
•Discuss and aggregate responses
•Write responses on cube
•Cut out and assemble cube
• Identify one person to share out group information
Group Resume: Bio Cube
Antecedents
CollaborationAccountability
Principles of Decision Making for Results
TM p. 3
Becoming Data-Driven
• How are you currently embracing a data-driven decision-making process that leads to results?
TM p. 5
•Where’s the Proof?
Marzano, Classroom Instruction that Works
Cotton, Classroom Questioning
Zemelman, Best Practices
NCTM Research Brief, Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning?
Educause Quarterly, Clickers in the Classroom
http://ctap10.org/moval2011
Results-Driven Schools
“The value of the data emerges only when analysis provides insights that direct decisions for students.”
White, Beyond the numbers
Take notes on p. 8 as you read and/or as team shares out research
Reflection
• Cause data: professional practices that create specific effects or results
Definitions and Examples
• Effect data: outcomes or results
Leadership & Learning Matrix
LuckyHigh results, low understanding
of antecedents
Replication of success unlikely
LeadingHigh results, high understanding
of antecedents
Replication of success likely
Losing GroundLow results, low understanding
of antecedents
Replication of failure likely
LearningLow results, high understanding
of antecedents
Replication of mistakes unlikely
Leadership/Teaching Practices
Effects
/Results D
ata
1. Lucky (high results, low understanding)
2. Losing ground (low results, low understanding)
3. Learning (high results, high understanding)
4. Leading (high results, high understanding)
Where is your school?
A Look at Collaboration
•What elements did you observe that made the collaboration effective?
•How would you describe the attitudes of the participants?
Reflect on page 18 of DMR book
A Look at Collaboration
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
•What are the achievement levels of our incoming students?
•What are the achievement gaps?
•What targeted strategies can we apply to meet these gaps?
•What tools will we use to monitor whether we are effective?
Big Questions
•What do you want to know?
Effective strategies
Effective tools
Student learning needs
Student learning strengths
Reflect on page 20 of DMR book
Inquiry
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop
questions
Inquiry: Develop questions
DMR p. 21
•Why? – To gather and organize data in order to gain insights about leadership, teaching, and learning practices
•Considerations:
Measures of data
Disaggregation
Triangulation
Reflection
Step 1: Conduct a Treasure Hunt
•Disaggregation is not a problem-solving strategy. It is a problem-finding strategy.
Victoria Bernhardt, Data Analysis, 1998
Disaggregation
• Using district reports, chart the data in a way that makes sense for your grade level
• Think about:
In which strands are our students having the most success?
What are some common needs students coming into my class are likely to have?
If desired, chart data on templates: pages 27-31
Treasure Hunt Activity
•Highlight standards in which students scored lowest
•Cross reference with how heavily weighted those standards are in CST
For Example:
A. I was able to capture the data I need in the templates provided
B. I filled in the templates, but I’m not sure the data tells me anything useful
C. I got some data, but was not able to organize it in the templates
D. I cannot figure out the data or how to organize it
Checking In
White, S. (2005). Beyond the numbers.
Englewood, CO: Advanced
Learning Press.
It is not so much a lack of data, but an absence of analysis, and an even greater absence of actions driven by the data.
Treasure hunt Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
DMR p. 34
• Identify causes for celebration and to identify areas of concern
•Make inferences
Cognitive disconnect
Specific gaps
Cause
DMR p. 35
Analyze Data to Prioritize Needs
Grade Level Instruction
Grade K 95.3% Grade 5 40.1%
Grade 1 87.2% Grade 6 38.0%
Grade 2 62.1% Grade 7 32.9%
Grade 3 71.8% Grade 8 27.6%
Grade 4 46.5% Grade 9 11.8%
Grade Level Instruction
•Students perform no higher than the assignments given
•State tests assess grade-level content
•Students cannot learn what they are not taught
•Students learn more when taught at a higher level than at a lower level
Why Grade Level Instruction?
Grade LevelInstructional
Level
Curriculum Complexity
•Why? - To take immediate action on most urgent needs
•Considerations
Student needs
Curriculum and Power Standards
Foundational knowledge
Prioritization
White, S. (2005). Beyond the numbers.
Englewood, CO: Advanced Learning Press.
•Which strands and concepts are most important to target in order to ensure students will be successful with grade level content?
Table Conversation
1. Review data from Step 1 (DMR p. 27-32, EADMS reports)
2. Consider pacing schedule, CST weights, and professional judgment
3. Prioritize urgent needs
4. Record your work on templates pages 38-43
Analyze to Prioritize
•Explain what area you prioritized and why
•1 minute per person
Speed Round
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
DMR p. 44
•Why? – To identify our most critical goals for student achievement based on the challenges that were identified through the inquiry process
Specific
Measurable
Achievable
Relevant
Timely
Step 3: Establish SMART Goals
• Review prioritized needs
• Review Treasure Hunt baseline data
• Apply SMART goal formula
• Use templates if desired
DMR p 49
Handout
Write your own
Establish SMART Goals
• At the end of the Academy, you will have
developed at least one standards-aligned
SMART Notebook lesson which includes direct
instruction, cognitively demanding interactive
activities, and meaningful responder-based
quizzes and polls, all specifically tailored to
the needs of your incoming students.
Academy Outcome
1. SMART goal based on identified priorities
2. Identification of at least 2 Notebook tools or activities to support SMART goal
Final Products – Day 1
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop
questions
Inquiry: Develop questions
Treasure hunt Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
Treasure hunt
Analyze to
prioritize
SMART goals
Select strategies
Determine results
indicators
Monitor and
evaluate
The Process for Results
Inquiry: Develop questions
1. SMART goal based on identified priorities
2. Identification of at least 2 Notebook tools or activities to support SMART goal
Final Products – Day 1
1. Delicious. Like my favorite dessert.
2. Good. Like a wholesome entrée.
3. Nutritious. Like my least favorite vegetable.
4. Not so good. Like eating stale bread.
5. I’d rather eat sand.
How did today’s material go down?
•Standards and rigor
•Common Core: Standards of Mathematical Practice
•Cognitive demand and task analysis
•Work time
8:00 - Continental breakfast
8:30 - Academy begins
Day 2 Preview