mumbai metro project gr madan
TRANSCRIPT
THE PPP X-CHANGE, The GOI-ADB PPP Workshop, January 2010
Ashwini Bhide
Joint Metropolitan commissioner,
MMRDA,Mumbai
Urban Transport
Case Study: Mumbai Metro Project
Overview:MMRDA was established in 1975 under MMRDA Act
MMRDA is a Regional Planning Authority for MMR and Special Planning
Authority for certain notified areas within MMR.
Development Financing Agency for ULBs within MMR.
Nodal Agency for Centrally Sponsored Schemes.
Co-ordination Agency for Infrastructure Projects implemented by different
agencies.
Implementing Agency for various infrastructure projects within MMR with
Transport Infrastructure as the primary focus
Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority
Overview:• Implementing agency: MMRDA
• Master Plan prepared by DMRC with
the help of IIT Mumbai & TCS
• The main objective is to provide a
mass transit connectivity to people
within an approach distance of 1 to 2
K.m. & to serve the areas not
connected by existing Suburban Rail
System
• Total corridors indentified in
Greater Mumbai: 9 to be
implemented in three phases, total
length 146.5 km
Mumbai Metro Rail Project:
Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar
Charkop-Bandra- Mankhurd
Colaba-Mahim-Bandra
Charkop - Dahisar
Ghatkopar – Mulund
BKC-Kanjur Marg via Airport
Andheri(E) - Dahisar(E)
Hutatma Chowk - Ghatkopar
Sewri – Prabhadevi
Project Case Details
MMRDA equity :Rs.133Cr(26%)
Reliance Equity :Rs.353.1Cr(69%)
VioliaTransport Equity :Rs.25.59 Cr.(5%)
Elevated corridor of 11.77 km of total
Length with 12 Elevated stations
Minimum ground clearance : 5.5 m
Maximum Gradient : 4.0 %
Minimum Curvature : 100 m
Platform Length (6 Coaches):135 m
Project Cost: Rs 2356 Cr
Project Period: 2007 to 2012
Likely to be completed by December
2010
Viability Gap : Rs 650 Cr (28%)
Concession period : 35 years
Consessioning Authority : MMRDA
Concessioner : Joint Venture of Reliance Energy
Ltd and Violia Transport of France
SPV : MMOPL
Metro I : Varsova Andheri Ghatkopar Corridor
5
Salient FeaturesProject Overview and Salient Features
This corridor connects densely populated areas of
western & eastern suburbs and two important
suburban railway stations
High ridership forecast
Will provide access to important industrial and
commercial area
Will reduce the journey time from 71 min to 21 min between
Versova & Ghatkopar
Fare of Rs. 8.00 (up to 3 km) & Rs. 10.00 (> 3 km and <km)&
Rs.12 (> 8 km)-2009 Prices
Fare Revision Mechanism - Revised at the rate of 11 % every 4th
year.
Metro I : Varsova Andheri Ghatkopar Corridor
Expected daily ridership
2011: 5,15,000
2021: 6,64,000
2031: 8,82,000
6
VAG Corridor: Overview and Salient Features
• Scope of the Project – covers the finance, design, construction, testing ,
commissioning, operation and maintenance.
• Basis of the Concession Agreement –based on Model Concession Agreement
implemented by NHAI for road projects, modified and adopted to suite
requirements for implementing a rail based system.
• Nature of the Concession to be Granted –
• To investigate, study, design, engineer, procure, finance, develop, complete,
commission, operate and maintain the MRTS project Facility and;
• To levy, demand, collect and appropriate Fare from commuters and persons liable to
payment of Fare using the MRTS Project facility.
• Period of Concession: 35 years including construction period commencing from the
Appointed Date, i.e. signing of Concession Agreement including 5 years of construction
VAG Corridor: Overview and Salient Features
• Capital Contribution of Rs 650 cr
• Provide necessary space/land for Car
Depot and for locations of electric
sub stations on a nominal lease
charge of Rupee One per annum (Rs
1/annum) , free from all
encumbrances.
• Resettle and Rehabilitate (R & R) all
affected persons, as necessary
• Cost of shifting of utilities to be
borne by MMRDA
Risk sharing: Roles and responsibilities…
• No guarantee whatsoever with regard to
ridership and revenue has been provided.
Entire risk is to be borne by SPV.
• No assurances regarding parallel
competing facility has been given.
• Performance and Technical standards in
accordance with best industry practices
have been specified.
• Concessioner „s source of revenue: Fare
Box Collection, Advertisement Revenues,
100 square meter commercial space for
passenger amenities on each station
MMRDA Concessionaire
VAG corridor: Bidding Process
Eligibility Criteria
An Indian Company or a Company authorised to
carry out business in India or a JV with an
Indian Company
Net worth of more than Rs.5,000 million or US$
112 million
Annual Turnover for the last 3 years of more than
Rs.3,650 million or US $ 81.0 million
Relevant experience in developing, constructing or
operating a Mass Transit System with
minimum capacity of 20,000 PHPDT.
Evaluation
• First Stage-Technical Proposals
• Evaluate Bids for Financial Capability and Technical
Competence as per evaluation criteria
• Scrutinize system design proposals for conformity
o Technical and Performance specifications
• Obtain bidders‟ confirmation to incorporate
proposed modifications if any to provide level
playing ground
• Those bidders scoring 75% and above in technical
evaluation were eligible to submit financial proposal
• Second Stage-Financial Proposals:
• Evaluation of Business Plan and other formats
submitted as per RFP Documents
A bidder asking for minimum capital contribution to be selected as Preferred Bidder
Two stage evaluation process
VAG corridor: Bidding Process
•Received bids: five
•Technically qualified: three
• Mumbai Metro Consortium” led by L&T- Gammon Infrastructure Ltd – Siemens
and BEML
• “Mumbai Metro One consortium” led by Reliance Energy Limited (REL) –
Connex France
• “IICCU consortium” led by Infrastructure Leasing & Financial Services Limited
– ITD Thailand-Unity Infra
•Financial proposals received: two
Mumbai Metro One and IICCU
•Preferred Financial bid: Mumbai Metro One : Cost- Rs 2356 Cr and Capital Contribution: Rs 1251 Cr
•Negotiations carried out with the lowest bidder to reduce the capital cost
•As a result demand for capital contribution reduced from Rs 1251 Cr to Rs 650 Cr
•Negotiated offer evaluated by the Bid Evaluation Committee appointed by the Metropolitan
Commissioner
•Approval by the state cabinet to the revised offer
Salient features of Financial Offer
Parameters Mumbai Metro One (MM1)
Debt : Equity 70:30
Total project cost Rs. 2356 Crores
Capital Contribution (VGF) Rs 650 Crores
Total Equity – Rs 513 cr
REL : 69% ~ Rs. 353 Crores
Connex: 5% ~ Rs. 26 Crores
MMRDA: 26% ~ 134 Crores
Debt Rs. 1194 Crores
Total taxes and duties Rs. 296 Crores
Land To be provided free of cost
VAG Corridor: Investment Details
Bidding Process – Time Schedule
Milestone Date
Govt. of Maharashtra approval 19th August, 2004
Invitation of Global Bids 21st August, 2004
Pre-bid meeting 23rd November 2004
Technical bids 16th May, 2005
Invitation of Financial Bids 15th September, 2005
Receipt of financial bids 10th January, 2006
Evaluation of Financial bids January, 2006
Negotiations with the lowest bidder February-May, 2006
Negotiated offer 10th May, 2006
LOI issued after GOM approval June 2006
VAG Corridor :Milestone Achievements
• Public Information Centre was commissioned
• along the alignment at Sakinaka in 26th October, 2007.
• Partial ROW was provided to SPV on 17th December, 2007.
• Land for casting yard, Electric sub Station was
• provided to MMOPL by MMRDA in January, 2008.
• Actual construction work was started from 08th Feb,2008.
• Land for labour camps was handed over to MMOPL at Mulund and Malwani on 25th Feb,
2008 & 7th March, 2008.
Milestone Achievements ….
• SPV named Mumbai Metro One Pvt. Ltd. was incorporated on 22nd December,
2006
VAG Corridor: Milestone Achievements
• Land for car depot at D N Nagar handed over to MMOPL on 4th August, 2008.
• Lenders apprised the project and accorded their approval.
• O & M agreement between MMOPL & Veolia transport signed on 26th Sept, 2008.
• Financial closure achieved on 3rd Oct, 2008.
• Home guard Land handed over to MMOPL for casting Yard on 17th Jan, 2009.
• Western railway approved the GAD of major Bridge at Andheri on 17th march, 2009.
• GOI accorded approval for VGF up to 20% of project cost.
VAG Corridor: Milestone Achievements ….
Milestone Achievements ….
More than 90% ROW handed over to MMOPL
Utilities mapping, condition survey of adj. buildings completed and the work for utility
shifting is in progress.
Consortium of M/s Systra & Parsons Brinkerhoff are appointed as the Engineering and
Project Management Consultancy (EPMC) Consultants.
The contracts for the civil works, supply of rolling stock, track work, power supply,
Electrification, Signaling, Communications Automatic Fare collection System etc. awarded.
M/s Louis Berger Inc. in Association with RITES Limited are appointed as “Independent
Engineer”
Physical Progress: 70% foundation work completed, girder launching started at certain
stretches
VAG Corridor: Present Status
Pier Cap Launching
Viaduct @ D N Nagar Station Stretch
Viaduct @ Kamdhenu Junction Stretch
Viaduct @ J B Nagar
Civil Works – Pier Cap Casting
Civil Works – Pier Cap Stacking
Civil Works – Viaduct : Girder
Ghatkopar Station
Marol Naka Station
Will Cross the Andheri Flyover
Biggest pile cap foundation
on land for any bridge in the
country. 56 ft wide, 26 ft
wide & 16 ft deep
East Side
East Side
Tallest pier on land for any Metro bridge in the country :
East Side Pier of WEH Bridge, 60 ft
West Side
Marol Naka Station
Sakinaka Station
Project Case Details
BS
NL
Sh
iva
ji C
ho
wk
SG
Ba
rve
Ma
rg
Co
mp
lex
Ro
ad
Bh
ara
t N
ag
ar
MM
RD
A
RC
Ma
rg
Inco
me
Ta
x O
ffic
ce
Aryasamaj Chowk
National College
Charkop
Bandra
Ghatkopar
Versova
Mankhurd
Ku
rla
(M)
CharkopMalad (M)
Kasturi Park
Bangur Nagar
Oshiwara
Juhu
Ville Parle (M)
Nanavati hospital
Khar (M)
Shastri Nagar
DN Nagar
ESIC Nagar
JVPD
Samartha Nagar
Charkop – Bandra – Mankhurd AlignmentMetro Line 2: Charkop Bandra Mankhurd
Route Length 31.87 Km
Number of stations 27 –All Elevated
Daily passengers in Lakhs
2011 12.75
2021 18.77
2031 22.16
Maintenance Depot Charkop
Mankhurd
Interchange facilities D.N Nagar, Bandra, Kurla and
Mankhurd
Salient Features of Charkop –Bandra- Mankhurd Corridor
Project is being implemented on BOT / PPP format
Metro Line 2: Project Details
Process followed
GoI accorded approval to initiate Pre-Qualification process subject to the
condition that model documents finalized by GoI/Planning Commission will be
followed.
The Pre-Qualification process started based on RFQ document of GoI.
Concession Agreement finalized based on Bid Documents of Hyderabad Metro
and drafts of Planning Commission.
The documents submitted to Department of Economic Affairs (DEA) on 19th
June 2008.
Clearance was given by DEA in October 2008 after several meetings.
The bid documents were issued to the bidders in October 2008
List of Technically qualified bidders
• Essar (India, Mumbai), Alstom (France), Lanco Infratech (India)
• GVK Power & Infrastructure Ltd. (India, AP), Yeoh Tiong Lay (Malaysia),
Bombardier Transportation (USA)
• IL&FS (India), Transportation Network Ltd (India, Mumbai), Punjleoyd Ltd (India,
Delhi), Soma Enterprise Ltd. (India, Hyderabad)
• Larson & Tubro Ltd. (L&T Ltd) (India)-IDPL, GE India Industries Ltd. – IIPL, CAF
• Tata Power Company Ltd. (India, Mumbai), Pioneer Infratech Pvt. Ltd (India, New
Delhi), Mitsubishi Corporation (Japan).
• Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. (India, Mumbai), SNC-Lavalin Inc. (Canada), Reliance
Communication Ltd. (India, Mumbai).
• Reliance Industries Ltd. (India, Mumbai), Siemens AG (Berlin -Germany),
Gammon India Ltd. (India , Mumbai).
DEA sanctionedVGF grant of Rs. 1532 Cr. in Nov. 2008
Financial Proposals were finally received on 29th May 2009 after few extensions of
bid due date as per request of the bidders.
After initial extensions with the help of ADB‟s PPP expert working with the state
government confidence building meetings were held with the selected bidders and
their concerns were addressed.
• As a result one bid from consortium led by M/s Reliance Infrastructure Ltd. was
received demanding a grant of Rs. 2298 Cr.
• The Concession Agreement will be signed by GoM. MMRDA will however be the
project implementing agency as well as the government instrumentality as per G.R
Dated 17th March 2009
• GoM/MMRDA will not hold any equity in the SPV. The concessionaire will however
allot one Golden Share in favour of the government which will entitle the
government to nominate one Director on the Board of the Concessionaire
Continued …
GoM Approved the project 14.11.2006
Proposal for VGF Funding 16.11.2006
Invitation of Global Bids 18.02.2007
PQ issued to Applicants (32) 01.03.2007
PQ applications submission date (8 applicants submitted) 11.06.2007
Submission of Technical Proposal
(7 Pre-qualified applicants were asked to submit the Technical
proposal)
30.11.2007
Proposal for In-principle approval for VGF for revised cost of
Rs 8250 Cr
16.07.2008
Final Bid Documents issued to Bidders 02.02.2008
Metro Line 2: Milestones Achievement
Bid documents approved by GoM 26.03.2009
Submission of Financial proposal 29.05.2009
LOA issued 03.08.2009
Laying of Foundation Stone by Hon‟ble President of
India
18.08.2009
Formation of SPV 29.10.2009
Signing of the Concession Agreement 21.1.2010
Financial Closure October 2010
* Commencement of Work September 2010
Metro Line 2: Milestones Achievement
Financial Obligation on MMRDA
• Project Cost Rs 8250 Cr.
• VGF *Rs 766 Cr.
• Utilities shifting & R&R Rs. 382 Cr.
• Independent Engineer Fee Rs 39 Cr.
• Land Acquisition Rs 665 Cr.
• Total Rs 1852 Cr.
* VGF of Rs. 1532 Cr. will be provided by GoI,
Total VGF Grant demanded by Bidder is Rs. 2298 Cr.
Distance Metro Fare (in Rs.) 2007-08
0-3KM 7
3-8KM 9
8-12KM 11
12-15KM 13
15-20KM 15
20-25KM 18
25-30KM 20
>30KM 22
Fare Structure for Mumbai Metro Line 2
The METRO fare to be revised at the rate of 11% every fourth year
Key-Lessons:-
41
Public Private Participation (PPP) model as the preferred mode of implementation for
capital-intensive rail-based urban transit projects due to budgetary resource crunch.
Adoption of model transaction documents will expedite competitive bidding process.
Realistic Eligibility criteria for the lead and other consortium members shall ensure
technically strong & financially sound Special PurposeVehicle (SPV).
Potential Bidders‟ concerns must be addressed adequately through process of
consultation.
Model Concession Agreement finalized by Planning Commission needs further fine-
turning especially with reference to technical aspects.
Only a well structured project will be attractive to private investors.
42
Risk-allocation has to be equitable; Tendency to pass on maximum risk to
the Concessionaire will prove counter productive.
Ridership risks-area of major concern for the private investors; Realistic
provisions will make projects more bankable & minimise demand to Viability
Gap Fund (VGF).
Property Development as a part of the concession does reduce demand for
VGF but lack
For the Operation & Maintenance phase, Concession Agreement must have
transparent, easy to implement and monitor provisions to achieve desired
quality of service.
For success of PPP model conducive environment is a MUST.
Key Lessons
Thank you