multivariate land data assimilation at global...
TRANSCRIPT
Mitglie
d d
er
Helm
holtz-G
em
ein
schaft
Multivariate Land Data Assimilation at Global Scale
Xujun Han1,2, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen1,2, Carsten Montzka1,2, Harry Vereecken1,2, Rui Jin3,4, Xin Li3,4
1.Forschungszentrum Jülich, Agrosphere (IBG 3), Leo-Brandt-Strasse, 52425 Jülich, Germany
2.Centre for High-Performance Scientific Computing in Terrestrial Systems, Leo-Brandt-Strasse, 52425 Jülich, Germany
3.Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou 730000, PR China
4.CAS Center for Excellence in Tibetan Plateau Earth Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, PR China
Figure 2. Average latent heat flux of FLUXNET(MTE)-a, CLM Openloop
simulation-b, data assimilation (ESA_SM-c or GRACE-d) on 01-2009
Community Land Model
CRUNCEP
ForcingVegetation Soil
ESA Soil
Moisture
GRACE Data Assimilation
Figure 1. Global land data assimilation with community land model
a b
c d
Summary
1. ESA CCI soil moisture product and GRACE terrestrial water storage
anomalies were assimilated into the Community Land Model (Fig. 1) using
the Local Ensemble Transform Kalman Filter.
2. The FLUXNET-MET latent heat flux and runoff data (Global Runoff Data
Centre) were used to evaluate the results of different scenarios.
3. Fig. 2 shows the average latent heat flux on 01-2009, the zonal average of
latent heat flux on 01-2009 is summarized in Fig. 3. The openloop
simulation of CLM shows very good performance compared with
FLUXNET-MTE. And two data assimilation scenarios (ESA_SM and
GRACE) improved the results of latent heat flux further. Because most areas
of northern hemisphere were not updated in data assimilation due to the low
temperature condition in January and February, the impacts of data
assimilation on the southern hemisphere are more obvious.
4. The differences among different scenarios of data assimilation and openloop
simulation are showed in Fig. 4 and Fig. 5 for latent heat flux, runoff and soil
moisture (10 cm and 50 cm), respectively.
5. The leaf area index, snow water equivalent measurement and other sources of
observation could also be used in the data assimilation to improve the results
further.
Figure 3. Zonal average of latent heat flux on 01-2009
Figure 4. Difference of latent heat flux (upper) and runoff (lower) between
data assimilation (ESA_SM-a,c or GRACE-b,d) and CLM Openloop
simulation on 01-2009
Figure 5. Difference soil moisture at 10 cm (upper) and 50 cm (lower)
between data assimilation (ESA_SM-a,c or GRACE-b,d) and CLM
Openloop simulation on 01-2009
Acknowledgements:The authors would also like to thank ESA Dragon 3 program (Project ID 10649),
DFG (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) Forschergruppe 2131; NSFC (National
Science Foundation of China) project (grant number: 41271357, 91125001);
Transregional Collaborative Research Centre 32, financed by the German Science
foundation; Supercomputing facilities of Forschungszentrum Julich (JUROPA)
GRACE land data were processed by Sean Swenson, supported by the NASA
MEaSUREs Program, and are available at http://grace.jpl.nasa.gov
Contact:https://github.com/daspy/daspy --- [email protected]
References:Jung, M., Reichstein, M., and Bondeau, A.: Towards global empirical upscaling of
FLUXNET eddy covariance observations: validation of a model tree ensemble approach
using a biosphere model, Biogeosciences, 6, 2001-2013, 2009.
Landerer, F. W. and Swenson, S. C.: Accuracy of scaled GRACE terrestrial water storage
estimates, Water Resour Res, 48, 2012.
Liu, Y. Y., Dorigo, W. A., Parinussa, R. M., de Jeu, R. A. M., Wagner, W., McCabe, M. F.,
Evans, J. P., and van Dijk, A. I. J. M.: Trend-preserving blending of passive and active
microwave soil moisture retrievals, Remote Sens Environ, 123, 280-297, 2012.
Liu, Y. Y., Parinussa, R. M., Dorigo, W. A., De Jeu, R. A. M., Wagner, W., van Dijk, A. I.
J. M., McCabe, M. F., and Evans, J. P.: Developing an improved soil moisture dataset by
blending passive and active microwave satellite-based retrievals, Hydrology and Earth
System Sciences, 15, 425-436, 2011.
Swenson, S. and Wahr, J.: Post-processing removal of correlated errors in GRACE data,
Geophys Res Lett, 33, 2006.
Wagner, W., Dorigo, W., de Jeu, R., Fernandez, D., Benveniste, J., Haas, E., and Ertl, M.:
Fusion of active and passive microwave observations to create an essential climate
variable data record on soil moisture, XXII ISPRS Congress, Melbourne, Australia, 2012.
315-321, 2012.
a b
c d
a b
c d