multiple roles for the wilms' tumor suppressor, wt11 · wilms' tumor formation (6, 7)....

6
[CANCER RESEARCH (SUPPL.) 59, 1747s-1751s, April 1, 1999] Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 Rachel Davies, Adrian Moore, Andreas Schedl, Eva Bratt, Kiyoshi Miyahawa, Michael Ladomery, Colin Miles, Aswin Menke, Veronica van Heyningen, and Nicholas Hastie e Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom Abstract Wihns' tumor is a childhood kidney tumor that is a striking example of the way that cancer may arise through development gone awry. A pro- portion of these tumors develop as a result of the loss of function muta- tions in the Wilms' tumor suppressor gene, WT1. Inherited mutations in the WT1 gene can lead to childhood kidney cancer, severe gonadal dys- plasia, and life-threatening hypertension. Knockouts show that the gene is essential for the early stages of kidney and gonad formation. These tissues are completely absent in null mice. The WT1 gene encodes numerous protein isoforms, all of which share four zinc fingers. There is a large body of evidence supporting the notion that WTI is a transcription factor, particularly a transcriptional repressor. Recently, however, we obtained evidence that WT1 colocalizes and is physically associated with splice factors. What is more, one alternative splice isoform of WTI containing three amino acids, Lys-Thr-Ser (KTS; inserted between zinc fingers 3 and 4) is preferentially associated with splice factors, whereas the other alter- native splice version, lacking these three amino acids, preferentially asso- ciates with the transcriptional apparatus. Both genetic and evolutionary considerations suggest that these two different forms of the protein have different functions. We will discuss recent evidence to further implicate WT1 in splicing. Our results raise the possibility that regulation of splicing is a crucial factor in the development of the genitourinary system, and that tumors may arise through aberrant splicing. To pursue the regulation and function of WT1 in whole animals, we have been introducing the human gene and large flanking regions cloned in yeast artificial chromosomes directly into mice. These studies have allowed us to dissect the function of WT1 at late as well as at early stages in organogenesis and to identify new sites and surprising new potential functions for the gene. Introduction Wilms' tumor of the kidney is a striking example of the way cancer can arise through aberrant differentiation (1). Wilms' tumor is a relatively common pediatric cancer, affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 children world-wide during the first few years of life. The tumors arise through inappropriate proliferation of nephric stem cells that should, in normal circumstances, differentiate and stop dividing or perhaps die. To understand tumorigenesis, it is necessary to consider what we know about the normal--beautifully orchestrated--process of kidney development. The permanent kidney or metanephros arises from two embryonic tissues, the mesonephric duct and metanephric mesen- chyme, both of which derive from intermediate mesoderm. Epithelial structures called ureteric buds grow out of the mesonephric duct and invade the mesenchymal cells that condense around the bud to form the blastema. Through a series of reciprocal induction events between the bud and blastema, the nephron and collecting systems form and eventually link up. The bud sends signals to the blastema cells, which first proliferate and then differentiate to form (eventually) the epithe- lial cells of the proximal and distal tubules, the loop of Henle, and the glomerulus. The ureteric buds, on the other hand, will branch in response to signals from the blastema and go on to form the collecting ducts. Wilms' tumors arise from the blastemal cells, probably after induc- tion has been initiated because the tumors often go on to develop tubular and glomerular-like structures. A typical Wilms' tumor is classified as triphasic, consisting of blastema, epithelial structures, and stromatous components all of which derive from blastema during normal development. Why Do These Tumors Arise? In 10-15% of cases, Wilms' tumors develop through loss of function of the first Wilms' tumor gene identified, WT1, mapping to chromosome 1 lp13 (2, 3). In the remaining 85% of cases, WT1 is not mutated, and other genetic lesions are implicated. As yet, no other definite Wilms' tumor gene has been identified, but a strong candidate is the IGF23 gene on chromosome 1 l pl5. Normally IGF2 is an imprinted gene that is expressed only from the paternal allele. How- ever, in the majority of Wilms' tumors, there is relaxation of imprint- ing; therefore, the maternal allele is also expressed (4, 5), which leads (one presumes) to an increased dose that is known to result in developmental abnormalities but is not yet convincingly linked to Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with an eye problem--aniridia--and are often mentally retarded and have genital abnormalities. Such children, said to have the WAGR syndrome, have constitutional hemizygous deletions of chromosome 1 lp13. Positional cloning in the region led to the isolation of the WT1 gene that encodes a protein with four zinc fingers of the Kruppel type and, therefore, is likely to be a transcrip- tion factor (2, 3). Children with the WAGR syndrome have only one copy of WT1 deleted in all their cells. However, when tumors of such individuals were analyzed, the second WT1 copy was found to be mutated or deleted. Thus, the complete loss of function of the WTI gene is required for tumorigenesis. Hence, WT1 conforms to Knud- son's rule and can be classified as a tumor suppressor gene. However, unlike the majority of tumor suppressor genes such as Rb-1 and p53, WT1 is clearly a developmental gene expressed in, and essential for the production of, only a limited set of mesodermal tissues, particu- larly the genitourinary system. Here I will discuss our latest findings or approaches to understanding the developmental and biochemical roles of WT1, and how we are using mouse models to help dissect its functions. Although there has been some significant progress of late, we still do not understand why loss of WT1 function in the developing kidney leads to the formation of a Wilms' tumor. What Can We Learn about WT1 Function by Studying Tumors? Received 9/18/98; accepted 2/5/99. 1Presented at the "General Motors Cancer ResearchFoundationTwentiethAnnual Sci- entific Conference:Developmental Biology and Cancer," June 9-10, 1998, Bethesda,MD. N. H. and V. v. H. are InternationalScholarsof the HowardHughesMedicalInstitute.M. L. is supportedby a Grant fromthe NationalKidney ResearchFoundation.A. M. is supported by a WcllcomcTrust InternationalFellowship.C. M. is an MRC Training Fellow. 2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom. WT1 is expressed in a dynamic and tissue-specific pattern during development; the major sites of expression during organogenesis are the developing kidney, gonad, and mesothelium (8). All of these tissues experience a mesenchyme-to-epithelial switch as WT1 expres- 3 The abbreviationsused are: IGF, insulin-likegrowth factor; KTS, Lys-Thr-Ser;YAC, yeast artificial chromosomes. 1747s Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancer cancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Upload: others

Post on 25-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

[CANCER RESEARCH (SUPPL.) 59, 1747s-1751s, April 1, 1999]

Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11

R a c h e l D a v i e s , A d r i a n M o o r e , A n d r e a s S c h e d l , E v a B r a t t , K i y o s h i M i y a h a w a , M i c h a e l L a d o m e r y , C o l i n M i l e s ,

A s w i n M e n k e , V e r o n i c a v a n H e y n i n g e n , a n d N i c h o l a s H a s t i e e

Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom

Abstract

Wihns' tumor is a childhood kidney tumor that is a striking example of the way that cancer may arise through development gone awry. A pro- portion of these tumors develop as a result of the loss of function muta- tions in the Wilms' tumor suppressor gene, WT1. Inherited mutations in the WT1 gene can lead to childhood kidney cancer, severe gonadal dys- plasia, and life-threatening hypertension. Knockouts show that the gene is essential for the early stages of kidney and gonad formation. These tissues are completely absent in null mice. The WT1 gene encodes numerous protein isoforms, all of which share four zinc fingers. There is a large body of evidence supporting the notion that WTI is a transcription factor, particularly a transcriptional repressor. Recently, however, we obtained evidence that WT1 colocalizes and is physically associated with splice factors. What is more, one alternative splice isoform of WTI containing three amino acids, Lys-Thr-Ser (KTS; inserted between zinc fingers 3 and 4) is preferentially associated with splice factors, whereas the other alter- native splice version, lacking these three amino acids, preferentially asso- ciates with the transcriptional apparatus. Both genetic and evolutionary considerations suggest that these two different forms of the protein have different functions. We will discuss recent evidence to further implicate WT1 in splicing. Our results raise the possibility that regulation of splicing is a crucial factor in the development of the genitourinary system, and that tumors may arise through aberrant splicing. To pursue the regulation and function of WT1 in whole animals, we have been introducing the human gene and large flanking regions cloned in yeast artificial chromosomes directly into mice. These studies have allowed us to dissect the function of WT1 at late as well as at early stages in organogenesis and to identify new sites and surprising new potential functions for the gene.

Introduction

Wilms' tumor of the kidney is a striking example of the way cancer can arise through aberrant differentiation (1). Wilms' tumor is a relatively common pediatric cancer, affecting approximately 1 in 10,000 children world-wide during the first few years of life. The tumors arise through inappropriate proliferation of nephric stem cells that should, in normal circumstances, differentiate and stop dividing or perhaps die.

To understand tumorigenesis, it is necessary to consider what we know about the normal- -beaut i fu l ly orchestrated--process of kidney development. The permanent kidney or metanephros arises from two embryonic tissues, the mesonephric duct and metanephric mesen- chyme, both of which derive from intermediate mesoderm. Epithelial structures called ureteric buds grow out of the mesonephric duct and invade the mesenchymal cells that condense around the bud to form the blastema. Through a series of reciprocal induction events between the bud and blastema, the nephron and collecting systems form and eventually link up. The bud sends signals to the blastema cells, which first proliferate and then differentiate to form (eventually) the epithe- lial cells of the proximal and distal tubules, the loop of Henle, and the

glomerulus. The ureteric buds, on the other hand, will branch in response to signals from the blastema and go on to form the collecting ducts.

Wilms' tumors arise from the blastemal cells, probably after induc- tion has been initiated because the tumors often go on to develop tubular and glomerular-like structures. A typical Wilms' tumor is classified as triphasic, consisting of blastema, epithelial structures, and stromatous components all of which derive from blastema during normal development.

Why Do These Tumors Arise?

In 10-15% of cases, Wilms' tumors develop through loss of function of the first Wilms' tumor gene identified, WT1, mapping to chromosome 1 lp13 (2, 3). In the remaining 85% of cases, WT1 is not mutated, and other genetic lesions are implicated. As yet, no other definite Wilms' tumor gene has been identified, but a strong candidate is the IGF23 gene on chromosome 1 l p l5 . Normally IGF2 is an imprinted gene that is expressed only from the paternal allele. How- ever, in the majority of Wilms' tumors, there is relaxation of imprint- ing; therefore, the maternal allele is also expressed (4, 5), which leads (one presumes) to an increased dose that is known to result in developmental abnormalities but is not yet convincingly linked to Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7).

The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with an eye p rob lem--an i r id ia - -and are often mentally retarded and have genital abnormalities. Such children, said to have the WAGR syndrome, have constitutional hemizygous deletions of chromosome 1 lp13. Positional cloning in the region led to the isolation of the WT1 gene that encodes a protein with four zinc fingers of the Kruppel type and, therefore, is likely to be a transcrip- tion factor (2, 3). Children with the WAGR syndrome have only one copy of WT1 deleted in all their cells. However, when tumors of such individuals were analyzed, the second WT1 copy was found to be mutated or deleted. Thus, the complete loss of function of the W T I

gene is required for tumorigenesis. Hence, WT1 conforms to Knud- son's rule and can be classified as a tumor suppressor gene. However, unlike the majority of tumor suppressor genes such as Rb-1 and p53,

WT1 is clearly a developmental gene expressed in, and essential for the production of, only a limited set of mesodermal tissues, particu- larly the genitourinary system. Here I will discuss our latest findings or approaches to understanding the developmental and biochemical roles of WT1, and how we are using mouse models to help dissect its functions. Although there has been some significant progress of late, we still do not understand why loss of WT1 function in the developing kidney leads to the formation of a Wilms' tumor.

What Can We Learn about WT1 Funct ion by

Studying Tumors?

Received 9/18/98; accepted 2/5/99. 1 Presented at the "General Motors Cancer Research Foundation Twentieth Annual Sci-

entific Conference: Developmental Biology and Cancer," June 9-10, 1998, Bethesda, MD. N. H. and V. v. H. are International Scholars of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. M. L. is supported by a Grant from the National Kidney Research Foundation. A. M. is supported by a Wcllcomc Trust International Fellowship. C. M. is an MRC Training Fellow.

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Medical Research Council Human Genetics Unit, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, United Kingdom.

WT1 is expressed in a dynamic and tissue-specific pattern during development; the major sites of expression during organogenesis are the developing kidney, gonad, and mesothel ium (8). All of these tissues experience a mesenchyme-to-epithelial switch as WT1 expres-

3 The abbreviations used are: IGF, insulin-like growth factor; KTS, Lys-Thr-Ser; YAC, yeast artificial chromosomes.

1747s

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 2: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

MULTIPLE ROLES FOR WILMS' TUMOR SUPPRESSOR WT1

sion increases, leading to the hypothesis that WT1 may play a role in this switch. Although direct experimental evidence to prove a role for WT1 in the mesenchyme-to-epithelial switch is awaited, examination of tumors with WT1 mutations is informative.

Wilms' tumors can be classified into several groups from a his- topathological standpoint. The most common are triphasic tumors, containing a mixture of blastema, epithelial structures, and stroma (Fig. 1); another class is mainly stromal in character without epithelial structures. The third--fascinating and perhaps surprising--class com- prises Wilms' tumors with ectopic tissues, particularly muscle (Fig. 1), but more occasionally bone and cartilage; approximately 10% of Wilms' tumors show these ectopic tissues. Because the WT1 gene is also mutated in only 15% of tumors, it is worthwhile asking whether these show characteristic pathology. In a large survey, Schumacher et al. (9) were able to conclude that tumors with WT mutations are mostly stromal in character, supporting the idea that WT1 is required for epithelial development (9). Miyagawa et al. (10) examined ex- pression of myogenic genes, those essential for muscle formation, in a number of Wilms' tumors. They found that high expression of genes such as myoD or myf5 could only be detected in the subset of Wilms' tumors with WT1 mutations. Myogenic gene expression cannot be detected in the kidney during normal development. This leads us to the following model: during normal kidney development, mesenchy- mal stem cells expressing WT1 can differentiate into epithelial cells (Fig. 2). In tumors, if WT1 is missing, the mesenchymal cells can no longer differentiate into epithelia but can take on different fates, either stromal or myogenic (Fig. 2). The question is whether this is a default pathway or whether WT1 can play a direct role in repressing the myogenic program. Preliminary experiments in cell culture do support the idea that WT1 can repress muscle development (10), but proof of this will await transgenic experiments in mice.

Does WT1 Play Roles in Both Transcription and Splicing? Significance of Different WT1 Isoforms?

In all mammals studied, the WT1 gene expresses 16 slightly dif- ferent protein isoforms through a combination of alternative splicing,

NORMAL KIDNEY

Mesenchymal stem cell [~ Epithelium (Nephron)

~ Skele~cle TUMOR

Mesenchymal stem cell ~ Skeletal Muscle

Stroma Fig. 2. Postulated role for WT1 in normal kidney development and tumorigenesis.

RNA editing, and alternative translational start sites (Fig. 3). The significance of these different isoforms remains unclear; however, the fact that they are found in all of the mammals that diverged around 100 million years ago suggests that they all play important functions. It is interesting to consider the situation with the fish WT! gene, which seems to encode only two different isoforms (Fig. 3; Ref 11). It is noteworthy that these two isoforms--also found in mammals--differ by only three amino acids, KTS, inserted between zinc fingers 3 and 4 through alternative splicing. The fish genitourinary system is more primitive than that found in mammals. We are now trying to deter- mine how the evolution of WT1, both its structural complexity and regulation, may have contributed to the evolution of the genitourinary system.

Because WT1 has four zinc fingers, it was predicted to act as a transcription factor regulating the tissue-specific expression of genes during genitourinary development. There is now a considerable body of evidence supporting this idea (12). WTI protein binds to guanosine-rich DNA sequences of 9-12 nucleotides long. In transient transfection assays, WTI represses expression of reporter molecules linked to promoters with such guanosine-rich motifs; in some cases,

Fig. 1. Variable pathology of Wilms ' tumors; left panel, a typical triphasic tumor; right panel, skeletal muscle in a Wilms ' tumor.

1748s

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 3: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

M U L T I P L E R O L E S F O R W I L M S ' T U M O R S U P P R E S S O R W T !

however, WT1 can act as a transcriptional activator. Furthermore, WT1 can repress the expression of a number of important growth factor genes in cell culture, including the genes encoding the IGF2, the IGF1 receptor, the platelet-derived growth factor A chain and the epidermal growth factor receptor as well as the developmental gene PAX2 (for review, see Ref. 12). Several of these genes become down-regulated during kidney development concomittant with a rise in WT1 expression supporting physiological significance for the cell culture experiments. However, to this day, there is no conclusive evidence that WT1 acts to repress the expression of these genes in an in vivo chromosomal context during development. Given these find- ings, we were surprised that W T l - - o r at least a proportion of WT1-- colocalizes with splicing factors in kidney, testes, and mesothelial cells (13). What is more, WT1 was efficiently coimmunoprecipitated by antibodies to a number of splice factors which suggests that WT1 either directly or indirectly interacts with splicing proteins. We went on to show that the two WT1 isoforms with (+KTS) or without ( -KTS) the three-amino-acid insert between zinc fingers 3 and 4 localized differently in transfection experiments. Whereas the - K T S form colocalized mainly with transcription factors, the +KTS form colocalized mainly with the splicing proteins.

These findings add additional weight to the evidence that +KTS and -KTS WT1 isoforms have different functions. The most com- pelling evidence comes from an analysis of a human condition known as Frasier's syndrome. Children with Frasier's syndrome have a severe nephropathy, in the form of focal mesangial sclerosis, and also have gonadal dysgenesis in males. Remarkably this syndrome arises through a WT1 splicing mutation that prevents the production of the + KTS form from one allele, whereas the other allele is wild type and produces both forms (14, 15). Thus, in these children, one would predict that the ratio of + K T S : - K T S changes from, say, 60:40 to 40: 60. Hence the balance of these two different isoforms is critical for normal development and physiological function of the genitourinary system. These findings suggest that the two different WT1 isoforms have different functions, and that the balance of the two forms is critical. In addition, it has been shown that the -KTS WT1 isoform binds to DNA with relatively high affinity and to a 9-nucleotide motif, whereas the +KTS form binds to DNA with much lower affinity and to a motif of approximately 12 nucleotides (16, 17). Moreover, the two proteins behave differently in functional assays. Hence, under certain conditions the - K T S form can induce apoptosis in cell cul- ture, whereas the +KTS form cannot; the -KTS form in some cases promotes tumorigenesis, whereas the +KTS form inhibits it (for review, see Ref. 18).

Thus our findings suggest that WT1 may play roles in splicing as well as in transcription and that the two different isoforms play different roles. This has major implications for the mechanisms un- derlying normal development and tumorigenesis. However, the diffi- culty is to prove that WT1 really plays a role in splicing in a physiological context and to understand what that role is.

alternative splice 1

17-aa

M'~ I Co D (16 isoforms) [ f[[ " / •" )"~ N ' N Leu KTS

RNA alternative editing splice 2

Pro

Fish (fugu)

(2 isoforms) KT~5

Pro alternative splice 2

Fig. 3. Evolution of WT1 structure.

WT1 ..=

280kb

Not 1 Eag 1 Eag 1

< I I Lys

Exon 1 . .cue / / m / / construct "

Exon 1 Lac Z Leu 2 R ep o rter ~ [ '~ ,~ ~" i~ ~ '~ '~ c o n s t r u c t / / / / #

Leu 2 CMV Exon 1 Promoter switch / / construct e,g. CMV

actln

Fig. 4. YAC transgenic vectors for studying WT1 function and regulation.

Several new findings support a role for WT1 in RNA metabo- lism: (a) we showed with colleagues (19) that WT1 can bind RNA through the zinc fingers, something recently confirmed by Bard- eesy and Pelletier (20) who were also able to identify specific WTl-binding RNA sequences; and (b) a conserved RNA recogni- tion motif has been identified in the NH2-terminal region of the protein (21). Very recently we have shown that WT1 can be incorporated into active splice complexes (22), and that WT1 sediments with the properties of a ribonucleo-protein complex in nuclear extracts. Furthermore, we have shown that WT1 interacts specifically and directly with a basic splice factor, U2AF65, which is giving us some clues concerning its potential function (22). 4 Remarkably the +KTS form of WT1 interacts much more effi- ciently with U2AF65 than the - K T S form, correlating with the localization of these isoforms in vivo. Now the challenge is to identify physiological RNA targets and to determine the way in which WT1 influences the processing of these RNA molecules in normal development and during tumorigenesis.

Use of YAC Transgenesis to Explore WT1 Function

We have postulated that WT1 may play a role in the mesen- chyme-to-epithelial transition during kidney development, and also that WT1 may act as a suppressor of myogenesis in the mesen- chymal stem cell (10). From the perspective of tumorigenesis, it is vital to know whether WT1 plays a role in promoting apoptosis or suppressing the cell cycle, wtl null mice, although very informa- tive, do not shed any light on these issues. During normal devel- opment, WT1 is expressed at low levels in uncondensed mesen- chyme; then the levels increase as the cells condense around the bud (8). It is reasonable to assume that a tumor suppressor gene such as this will shut down the cell cycle in the induced mesen- chyme and also help to induce terminal differentiation. WT1 levels then stay high in the part of the S-shaped body that will go on to form the glomerulus, and levels continue to be high in the podocyte layer of the glomerulus. The wtl mutant mice completely lack kidneys; the mesenchymal stem cells form but then die through apoptosis, and the ureteric buds fail to invade the mesenchyme (23). Because these stem cells fail to survive, it is impossible to pursue the role of WT1 in the later stages of nephrogenesis in these mice. wtl - / - mice also lack gonads and die at 13.5 days of gestation, presumably because of heart failure although this has not been clarified.

4 Unpublished observations.

1749s

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 4: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

MULTIPLE ROLES FOR WILMS' TUMOR SUPPRESSOR WTI

To pursue WT1 func t ion at d i f fe ren t stages o f d e v e l o p m e n t and

in d i f fe ren t t issues , we are us ing a t ransgenic approach us ing very

large h u m a n f r agmen t s con ta in ing the W T 1 gene c loned in YACs.

There are severa l types o f expe r imen t that we are t ry ing to per-

form: ( a ) The first o f these is to express WT1 ec top ica l ly in

d i f fe ren t t issues at d i f fe ren t s tages o f deve lopmen t . For example , i f

we ec top ica l ly express WT1 in musc l e precursor cells, will m y o -

genesis be p reven ted? On the o ther hand, if WT1 is expressed in a

range of m e s e n c h y m a l cells inappropr ia te ly , wil l these conver t to

epi thel ia l cel ls? Does ectopic express ion of WT1 in f luence the

pro l i fe ra t ion o f s tem cells or induce cell dea th? Of ten in this type

o f exper iment , t i s sue-spec i f ic p romote r s are used to drive the

express ion of ind iv idua l cDNAs. In the case o f WT1 , we do not

th ink that this is des i rable because 16 d i f fe ren t fo rms of the prote in

are produced , and the rat ios o f these are more or less constant . As

an a l ternat ive s t ra tegy, we are rep lac ing the WT1 p r o m o t e r in the

Y A C with o ther p romote r s that wil l dr ive express ion in all o f the

WT1 i so fo rms s imu l t aneous ly and hope fu l l y in the correc t ratio

(Fig. 4). I f an in te res t ing p h e n o t y p e is observed, we can then make

muta t ions o f the Y A C in the yeas t cell; therefore , par t icu lar WT1

i soforms w o u l d be d i s rup ted or s t ructural mot i f s w o u l d be al tered.

So far, we have rep laced the WT1 p romote r wi th the c y t o m e g a l o -

virus p romote r that should dr ive express ion in all cells. W h e n the

Y A C was in jec ted into 1000 or more fer t i l ized eggs, no t ransgenic

mice were recovered . In fact, no t ransgenic mice have been ob-

ta ined up unt i l 13 days o f embryogenes i s . Thus , express ion of

WT1 e v e r y w h e r e causes le tha l i ty at an ear ly s tage o f d e v e l o p m e n t

(24). More recen t ly , we have rep laced the WT1 p romote r wi th an

actin p romote r and h e m a t o p o e t i c promoter . The lat ter is in teres t ing

because WT1 muta t ions have been iden t i f i ed in some m y e l o i d

l eukemias , and the prote ins are unde rexpres sed in a n u m b e r o f

l eukemias .

(b ) We are using transgenesis to fol low expression of the W T 1 gene

in mice and to al low dissection of the elements necessary for correct

t issue-specific and developmenta l expression of WT1. To do this, the

WT1 coding region was fused to a /3-galactocidase reporter in the

YAC, which was then purif ied and used to make transgenic lines (Fig.

4). The /3-galactocidase is expressed in all of the k n o w n WT1-

expressing tissues as well as in some interesting new sites o f expres-

sion (25, 26). This reporter is proving to be very usetul for s tudying

the early stages of intermediate mesode rm and k idney development

and the subsequent format ion of the geni tourinary system. We are

now making delet ion constructs and mutat ions of specific promoter

motifs in the WT1 YAC and testing the ability of these to be ex-

pressed in a normal pattern.

( c ) The f ina l type o f Y A C t r ansgene expe r imen t is to a t tempt

rescues o f the nul l p h e n o t y p e in mice (Fig. 4). I f the h u m a n WT1

Y A C can rescue d e v e l o p m e n t o f the W T 1 - / - mice, it wil l be

poss ib le to use this as a sys tem to test the impor t ance o f d i f fe ren t

w t l prote in doma ins and i soforms . Thus , mu ta t ions in splice sites,

d imer i za t ion domains , and R N A recogn i t ion m o t i f (RRM) can be

made , and the Y A C s can be tes ted for their abi l i ty to rescue.

A l though the f irst rescue expe r imen t s wi th the n o n m u t a t e d Y A C

have not w o r k e d comple t e ly , they have g iven new ins ights into the

func t ion of WT1 dur ing the d e v e l o p m e n t o f the k i d n e y and other

t issues (26). Hence , our part ial rescues show that WT1 func t ion is

requi red at severa l d is t inct s tages o f nephrogenes i s as p red ic ted by

the express ion pat tern. U l t ima t e ly it wil l be neces sa ry to make

specif ic WT1 muta t ions in the e n d o g e n o u s m o u s e gene us ing

h o m o l o g o u s r e c o m b i n a t i o n in ES cells and to use the cond i t iona l

cre / lox sys t em to detect the no rma l func t ion o f WT1 in d i f fe ren t

t issues at d i f fe ren t stages o f deve lopmen t .

1750s

References

1. Hastie, N. D. The genetics of Wilms' tumor: a case of disrupted development. Annu. Rev. Genet., 28: 523-558, 1994.

2. Call, K. M., Glaser, T., Ito, C. Y., Buckler, A. J., Pelletier, J., Haber, D. A., Rose, E. A., Kral, A., Yeger, H., Lewis, W. H., Jones, C., and Housman, D. E. Isolation and characterization of a zinc finger polypeptide gene at the human chromosome 11 Wilms' tumor locus. Cell, 60: 509-520, 1990.

3. Gessler, M., Poustka, A., Cavenee, W., Neve, R. L., Orkin, S. H., and Bruns, G. Homozygous deletion in Wilms' tumours of a zinc-finger gene identified by chro- mosome jumping. Nature (Lond.), 343: 774-778, 1990.

4. Ogawa, O., Eccles, M. R., Szeto, J., McNoe, L. A., Yun, K., el al. Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting implicated in Wilms' tumour. Nature (Lond.), 362: 749-751, 1993.

5. Rainer, S., Johnston, L. A., Dorby, C. J., Ping, A. J., Grundy, P. E., and Feinberg, A. P. Relaxation of imprinted genes in human cancer. Nature (Lond.), 362: 747-749, 1993.

6. Sun, F.-L., Dean, W. L., Kelsey, G., Allen, N. D., and Reik, W. Transactivation of lfg2 in a mouse model of Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. Nature (Lond.), 389: 809-815, 1997.

7. Hastie, N. D. Disomy and disease resolved? Nature, News and Views, 389: 785-787, 1997.

8. Pritchard-Jones, K., Fleming, S., Davidson, D., Bickmore, W., Porteous, D. J., Gosden, C., Bard, J., Buckler, A., Pelletier, J., Housman, D., Van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. The candidate Wilms' tumour gene is involved in genitourinary develop- ment. Nature (Lond.), 346: 194-197, 1990.

9. Schumacher, V., Schneider, S., Figge, A., Wildhardt, G., Harms, D., Schmidt, D., Weirich, A., Ludwig, R., and Royer-Pokora, B. Correlation of germ-line mutations and two-hit inactivation of the WTI gene with Wilms' tumors of stromal-predominant histology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 3972-3977, 1997.

10. Miyagawa, K., Kent, J., Moore, A., Charlieu, J-P., Little, M. H., Williamson, K. A., Kelsey, A., Brown, K., Hassam, S., Briner, J., Hayashi, Y., Hirai, H., Yazaki, Y., Van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. D. Loss of WT1 function leads to ectopic myogenesis in Wilms' turnout. Nat. Genet., 18: 15-17, 1997.

11. Miles, C., Elgar, G., Coles, E., Kleinjan, D-J., Van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. D. Complete sequencing of the Fugu WAGR region from WT1 to PAX6--dramatic compaction and conservation of synteny with human chromosome 1 lpl 3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 13068-13072, 1998.

12. Rauscher, F. J., III. The WT1 Wilms' tumor gene product: a developmentally regulated transcription factor in the kidney that functions as a tumor suppressor. FASEB J., 7: 896-903, 1993.

13. Larsson, S. H., Charlieu, J. P., Miyagawa, K., Engelkamp, D., Rassoulzadegan, M., Ross, A., Cuzin, F., van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. D. Subnuclear localization of WT1 in splicing or transcription factor domains is regulated by alternatice splicing. Cell, 81: 391-401, 1995.

14. Barbaux, S., Niaudet, P., Gubler, M-C., Grunfeld, J-P., Janbert, F., Kuttenn, F., Fekete, C. N., Souleyrean-Therville, N., Thibaud, E., Fellous, M., and McElreavey, K. Donor splice-site mutations in WT1 are responsible for Frasier syndrome. Nat. Genet., 17: 467-470, 1997.

15. van Heyningen, V. Sugar and spice and all things splice? Nat. Genet., 17: 367-368, 1997.

16. Bickmore, W. A., Oghene, K., Little, M. H., Seawright, A., van Heyningen, V., and Hastie, N. D. Modulation of DNA binding specificity by alternative splicing of the Wilms' tumor wtl gene transcript. Science (Washington DC), 257: 235- 237, 1992.

17. Drummond, I. A., Rupprecht, H. D., Rohwer-Nutter, P., Lopez-Guisa, J. M., Madden, S. L., Rauscher, F. J., I1/, and Sukhatme, V. P. DNA recognition by splicing variants of the Wilms' turnout suppressor, WT1. Mol. Cell. Biol., 14: 3800-3809, 1994.

18. Menke, A. L., Van der Eb, A. J., and Jochemsen, A. G. The Wihns' tumor gene: oncogene or tumor suppressor gene? Int. Rev. of Cyt., 181: 151-212, 1998.

19. Caricasole, A., Duarte, A., Larsson, S. H., Hastie, N. D., Little, M., Holmes, G., Todorov, I., and Ward, A. RNA binding by the Wilms' tumor suppressor zinc finger proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 7562-7566, 1996.

20. Bardeesy, N., and Pelletier, J. Overlapping RNA and DNA binding domains of the wtl tumor suppressor gene product. Nucleic Acids Res., 26: 1784-1792, 1998.

21. Kennedy, D., Ramsdale, T., Mattick, J., and Little, M. An RNA recognition motif in Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) revealed by structural modelling. Nat. Genet., 12: 329-332, 1996.

22. Davies, R. C., Calvo, C., Bratt, E., Larsson, S., Lamond, A. 1., and Hastie, N. D. WT1 interacts with the splicing factor U2AF65 in an isoform dependent manner and can be incorporated into spliceosomes. Genes Dev., 12: 3217-3225, 1998.

23. Kreidberg, J. A., Sariola, H., Loring, J. M., Maeda, M., Pelletier, J., Housmann, D., and Jaenisch, R. WT-1 is required for early kidney development. Cell, 74: 679-691, 1993.

24. Menke, A., Mclnnes L., Hastie, N. D., and Schedl, A. The Wilms' tumor suppressor WTI: approaches to gene function. Kidney Int., 53: 1512-1518, 1998.

25. Moore, A., Schedl, A., Mclnnes, L., Doyle, M., Hecksher-Sorensen, J., and Hastie, N. D. YAC transgenic analysis reveals Wilms' Tumour 1 gene activity in the proliferating coelomic epithelium, developing diaphragm and limb. MOD, 7 9 : 1 6 9 - 184, 1998.

26. Moore, A. W., Mclnnes, L., Kreidberg, J., Hastie, N. D., and Schedl, A. YAC complementation shows a requirement for Wtl in the development of epicardium, adrenal gland and throughout nephrogenesis. Development, in press, 1999.

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 5: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

MULTIPLE ROLES FOR WILMS' TUMOR SUPPRESSOR WT1

Discussion

Speaker: Could you say something about why you find only partial rescue by the human transgene?

Dr. Hastie: We think we only get partial rescue because we find the level of expression of the human transgene is lower than that of the endogenous mouse gene at later stages of kidney development. Whereas, it is expressed at the right levels in the developing epicardium. So we think it 's a dosage effect. But we are now trying to rescue with a mouse transgene to try to work out what 's the differ- ence.

Dr. Phillip Sharp: When you find the KTS form in the splicing bodies, have you expressed some parts of the protein and asked what is actually targeting it to these speckled regions?

Dr. Hastie: Yes, w e ' v e tried that. It 's , of course, more compli- cated than we would like. Certainly you require some zinc fingers normal ly when you do that sort of experiment . But, if we impair DNA binding in different ways, we still often get localization with speckles. It seems two different WT1 domains are involved. Then also it seems two domains are involved in interaction with U2AF65. It 's not simple.

Dr. Bruce Ponder: I asked him if there was any question he wished you 'd ask, he could ask it now.

Dr. Hastie: One thing I should say we ' re doing is to try to put fish genes back into mice. We' ve done this already to try to work out what it is that's different in evolution between the two.

1751s

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from

Page 6: Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT11 · Wilms' tumor formation (6, 7). The WT1 gene was identified because a few percent of children with Wilms' tumor are born with

1999;59:1747s-1751s. Cancer Res   Rachel Davies, Adrian Moore, Andreas Schedl, et al.   Multiple Roles for the Wilms' Tumor Suppressor, WT1

  Updated version

  http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/59/7_Supplement/1747s

Access the most recent version of this article at:

   

   

   

  E-mail alerts related to this article or journal.Sign up to receive free email-alerts

  Subscriptions

Reprints and

  [email protected] at

To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications

  Permissions

  Rightslink site. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC)

.http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/59/7_Supplement/1747sTo request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link

Research. on April 9, 2021. © 1999 American Association for Cancercancerres.aacrjournals.org Downloaded from