multiple myeloma 2016 - boca raton regional hospitalweb.brrh.com/msl/im2016/sunday - im 2016/4 - sun...
TRANSCRIPT
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine
Mayo Clinic Comprehensive Cancer Center
Multiple Myeloma 2016
Ayalew Tefferi
Professor of Medicine
Mayo Clinic
Slides were borrowed from
Vincent Rajkumar, MD
Myeloma expert Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
Disclosures
No conflicts to disclose
© Remstein E, Jevremovic D. 2010
NEW DIAGNOSTIC CRITERIA
• <10% BMPC AND
• <3gm/dL M protein AND
• No CRAB
• ≥10% BMPC OR
• ≥3 gm/dL M protein AND
• No CRAB
• Clonal PCPD
• CRAB
CRAB= Hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions attributable to a clonal plasma cell disorder
MGUS SMM MM
Rajkumar SV. Cecil Textbook of Medicine, 24th Edition, 2012
Previous Disease Definitions
Bone Marrow Plasma Cell ≥60%
Rajkumar SV et al. N Engl J Med 2011; N Engl J Med 2011; 365:474-475
CT PET-CT
Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A. In: Niederhuber JE, et al, eds. Abeloff’s Clinical Oncology, 5th Edition; 2013.
Rajkumar SV. In: Goldman L and Schafer AI, eds. Goldman’s Cecil Medicine, 24th Edition. 2012.
©2012 MFMER | 3206302-8
Smoldering Multiple Myeloma
Low-risk SMM:
5%/yr risk of MM
High-Risk SMM
Ultra-High Risk 40%/yr risk of MM
= MM
25%/year risk of MM
• >60% BMPC
• FLCr >100
• >1 MRI focal
lesions
Mateos M et al. N Engl J Med 2013;369:438-447.
Len/Dex versus Observation in High Risk SMM: OS
• <10% BMPC AND
• <3 gm/dL M protein AND
• No MDE
• ≥10%-60% BMPC OR
• ≥3 gm/dL S. M protein OR
• ≥500 mg/24h Ur. M protein AND
• No MDE
• PCPD, AND
• 1 or more MDE
• CRAB
• ≥60% BMPC
• ≥100 FLC ratio
• >1 MRI focal lesion
MDE, myeloma-defining events
MGUS SMM MM
Revised IMWG Criteria
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos M, Palumbo A, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-e548.
1961-70
1971-80
1981-90
1991-2000
2001-2010
Kumar S. Blood 2008;111: 2516 – 2520; Kumar S. Leukemia (2014) 28, 1122–1128.
Survival in Myeloma
Rajkumar SV et al. Blood 2011;118:3205-3211; Russell SJ et al. Lancet Oncology 2011
PROGNOSIS VARIES
MOLECULAR CLASSIFICATION
Myeloma Molecular Classification
t(14;16) (C-MAF)
t(14;20) (MAF-B)
Trisomies*
t(11;14) (CCND1)
t(6;14) (CCND3)
t(4;14) (FGFR3/
MMSET)
Standard-Risk ~75%
Intermediate-Risk ~10%
High-Risk ~15%
*10-15% have both trisomies and IgH translocation
Median survival <3 years Median survival 3-5 years Median survival 6-7 years
t(14;16) t(14;20) Del 17p
t(11;14)
t(6;14)
t(4;14)
High-Risk Intermediate-Risk Standard-Risk
msmart.org
CR appears critical Bortezomib Critical Excellent Outcome
*Presence of trisomies ameliorates high risk
Median survival <3 years Median survival 6-7 years
Trisomies
IMiDs
MM classification and Prognosis
Copyright ©2007 American Association for Cancer Research
Haessler, J. et al. Clin Cancer Res 2007;13:7073-7079
CR is critical in patients with high-risk myeloma
Low-Risk MM (87%) High-Risk MM (13%)
FIRST Trial: MPT vs Rd18 vs Rd till progression
Kaplan–Meier Estimates of Progression-free Survival and Overall Survival
Benboubker L et al. N Engl J Med 2014;371:906-917.
Bortezomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone vs. Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients (Pts) with Previously Untreated Multiple
Myeloma Without an Intent for Immediate Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT): Results of the Randomized Phase III Trial SWOG
S0777
Brian G.M. Durie, MD, Antje Hoering, PhD, S. Vincent Rajkumar, MD, Muneer H. Abidi, MD, Joshua Epstein, DSc, Stephen P. Kahanic, MD, Mohan Thakuri, MD, Frederic Reu, MD, Christopher M. Reynolds, MD, Rachael Sexton, MS, Robert Z. Orlowski, MD, PhD, Bart Barlogie, MD, PhD, Angela Dispenzieri, MD
Overall Survival By Assigned Treatment
Arm
Log-rank P value = 0.0125 (one sided)*
HR = 0.709 (0.516, 0.973)*
19
*Stratified
Rajkumar SV. 2015
Initial Treatment of Myeloma
Not Transplant Candidate
VRd
Newly Diagnosed MM
Transplant Candidate
*Frailty Score; Palumbo A, Blood. 2015;125:2068-2074.
Rd (if frail, age ≥75)*
ROLE OF TRANSPLANT
Attal M. N Engl J Med 1996; 335:97; Child J. N Engl J Med 2003; 348:1875
54
42
Role of Autologous Transplantation
Fermand. Blood 1998; 92:3131; Barlogie JCO 2006;24:929-936
Upfront versus Delayed Transplantation
MAG study SWOG study
Rajkumar SV. 2015
Initial Treatment of Myeloma
Not Transplant Candidate
VRd
Newly Diagnosed MM
Transplant Candidate
VRd x 4 cycles
Auto SCT +/-
Maintenance
(Len for std risk;
bortez for high risk)
VRd x4 cycles
Len maintenance
Delayed Transplant
*Frailty Score; Palumbo A, Blood. 2015;125:2068-2074.
Rd (if frail, age ≥75)*
POST-TRANSPLANT MAINTENANCE
Lenalidomide Maintenance: CALGB
McCarthy et al. N. Engl. J. Med. 366, 1770–1781 (2012).
PFS OS
Bortezomib Maintenance
HOVON trial: OS according to Arm and del(17p)
Sonneveld P et al. JCO 2012;30:2946-2955
©2012 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
Post-Transplant Maintenance
Dispenzieri et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2007;82:323-341; Kumar et al. Mayo Clin Proc 2009 84:1095-1110; Mikhael et al. Mayo Clin
Proc 2013;88:360-376. v12
Standard-Risk Intermediate-Risk High-Risk
Autologous stem cell transplant
2 cycles of Len consolidation and observe;
or consider Lenalidomide maintenance
t(11;14), t(6;14), Trisomies Del 17p, t(14;16),
t(14;20)
t(4;14)
Bortezomib-based maintenance
Autologous stem cell transplant
a
b
b
a
b5
b1 b2 *
*
*
20S proteasome particle
b-subunit ring
Proteasome Inhibitor Comparison
IC50s (nM)
Carfilzomib Bortezomib
Chymotrypsin-
like 6 7
Caspase-like 2400 74
Trypsin-like 3600 4200
Biochemical mechanism and selectivity
Carfilzomib Bortezomib
Irreversible
(keto-epoxide tetrapeptide)
Slowly reversible
(boronic acid dipeptide)
Highly selective for chymotrypsin-like
active site within the proteasome
Inhibits both chymotrypsin-like and caspase-
like activities of the proteasome
Highly selective for proteasome
N-terminal threonine active sites Cross reactivity with serine proteases
* Three distinct N-terminal threonine protease active sites Stewart, ASCO 2007
Progression-free Survival.
Stewart AK, et al. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(2):142-152.
Carfilzomib-Rd vs Rd: Aspire Trial
RELAPSED MYELOMA
years from start of regimen 'i'
cu
mu
lati
ve p
rob
ab
ilit
y (
%)
0 2 4 6 8 10
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Regimen 1
Regimen 2
Regimen 3
Regimen 4
Regimen 5
Regimen 6
Overall survival in Relapsed MM by regimen number
Kumar S. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79:867-74
Pom-Dex vs Dex (PFS)
San Miguel J, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14(11):1055-1066.
San Miguel JF, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(11):1195-1206.
Panobinostat-Vel vs Vel (PFS): Panorama 1 Trial
Treatment of Relapsed Myeloma
Alkylators Steroids Interferon Anthracyclines
Ixazomib Marizomib Daratumumab SAR650984
Dinaciclib Filanesib LGH447 ABT-199 Elotuzumab
Carfilzomib Pomalidomide
Panobinostat
Old Drugs Recently Approved
Drugs Future Drugs
Bortezomib Thalidomide Lenalidomide
Older Drugs
Rajkumar SV. 2015
Figure Response with increasing duration of therapy (A) and waterfall plot of best M-protein response (B) among 52
response-evaluable patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose One patient in phase 2 was excluded from the
response-evaluable populati...
Kumar et al. The Lancet Oncology, Volume 15, Issue 13, 2014, 1503 - 1512
Ixazomib-Rd
Lonial S et al. N Engl J Med 2015. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1505654
ELOQUENT 2: Elotuzumab Rd vs Rd
PFS
Daratumumab: Overall Response Rate in 106 refractory patients with MM
• ORR was 29% (95% CI, 21–39) in
patients receiving 16 mg/kg DARA
• The clinical benefit rate (ORR + MR)
was 34% (95% CI, 25–44)
• VGPR or better was achieved in 12%
(95% CI, 7–20) of patients including
sCR 3% (95% CI, 0.6–8.0)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
16 mg/kg
Ove
rall
re
sp
on
se
ra
te, %
ORR = 29%
sCR
n = 3 (3%)
VGPR
n = 10 (9%)
PR
n = 18 (17%)
Lonial S et al. ASCO 2015
Active Drugs in Multiple Myeloma
Alkylators Steroids Interferon Anthracyclines
Oprozomib Marizomib
Isatuximab
Dinaciclib Filanesib LGH447 ABT-199
Carfilzomib Pomalidomide Panobinostat
Daratumumab Ixazomib Elotuzumab
Old Drugs Recently Approved
Drugs (2013-2015) Future Drugs
Bortezomib Thalidomide Lenalidomide Liposomal
doxorubicin
Older Drugs
(2003-2007)
Rajkumar SV. 2015