multi-hazard design of blast-resistant façades
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades
Presenter: Carrie Davis, P.E.
NCSEA WebinarAugust 9, 2016
![Page 2: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Learning Objectives1. Become familiar with blast effects on
façade components2. Understand and apply government and
industry multi-hazard criteria3. Become familiar with the coordination
process between blast design and other requirements
4. Recognize common conflicts and how to solve them with efficient detailing and project coordination
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 2
![Page 3: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Blast-Resistant Design of Facades
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 3
![Page 4: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Blast Load Basics• Common sources:
– High explosives (bomb, warhead…)– Vapor cloud explosions (from gas or
chemical leak)• Definition:
– Energy that dissipates violently through shockwaves, projectiles, and thermal radiation
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 4
![Page 5: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Blast Load Basics• Shock waves are NOT like wind
– Can not be redirected– Wind moves air particles, while shock
propagates through air particles– Rare design event
• Design goal is protection of people or critical systems
• Dissipate energy through significant movement• Components may need to be replaced
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 5
![Page 6: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Why design for blast loads?
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 6
![Page 7: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Blast Effects• Most injuries and occasionally a few
fatalities that occur during a bombing event are associated with façade debris
• Façade hazards from high-velocity, flying debris:– Lacerations from glass shards– Blunt trauma from wall debris or entire
window systems
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 7
![Page 8: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Wall Hazards
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 8
![Page 9: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Wall Hazard Mitigation
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 9
![Page 10: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Window Hazards
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 10
![Page 11: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Window Hazard Mitigation
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 11
![Page 12: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Door Hazards
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 12
![Page 13: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Door Hazard Mitigation
August 2016
Severe Damage Moderate DamageNCSEA Webinar 13
![Page 14: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Multi-Hazard Façade Design Loads
Load Type Load Duration Design Codes & Standards*
Trad
ition
al
Dead always IBC & ASCE7
Wind seconds IBC & ASCE7
Hurricane seconds ASCE7, ASTM E1886 & E1996
Tornado seconds FEMA P361 & ICC-500
Earthquake minutes ASCE7, ASCE 41, AISC Design Guide 22
Blast milliseconds Government (DoD UFC, VA, GSA/ISC, DoS) and Industry
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 14
More
Less
Load
Con
fiden
ce
*not an exhaustive list
Static
Dynamic
Load
App
licat
ion
![Page 15: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
LLOP
Tornadoes and Hurricanes• Goal: prevent loss of life and limit building damage
due to high wind and impact loads • Available Criteria:
– Safe rooms for tornado and hurricane hazards• ICC-500 (2014) – storm shelter design for
tornadoes• FEMA P361 (2015) – higher resistance
than ICC-500, but based on that approach– Hurricane debris impact protection (costal
areas)• ASCE 7-10 – for wind load design• ASTM E1996 (2014) and E1886 (2013) –
for impact test methods and requirementsAugust 2016 NCSEA Webinar 15
![Page 16: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
LLOP
Tornadoes and Hurricanes• Design Methods:
– Wind: static analysis or testing– Debris Impact: testing (and/or finite element modeling)
August 2016 16NCSEA Webinar
Tornado Debris Impact(200 lbs at 300 mph)
![Page 17: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
LLOP
Earthquakes (Seismic Hazards)• Goal:
– Falling architectural façade components could present a hazard to building occupants
– Components must be capable of resisting the forces (heavy facades increase seismic forces) and deformations associated with seismic loads
• Available Criteria:– ASCE 7-10 (Chap. 13) – design requirements for non-
structural components– Generally architectural components in Seismic Category
B are exempt for seismic provisions (unless specific of project)
– ASCE 41 and AISC Design Guide 22 “Façade Attachment” also provide guidance
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 17
![Page 18: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
LLOP
Earthquakes (Seismic Hazards)• Design Methods:
– Analysis – Testing
• ICC-ES AC156
– Experience data
August 2016 18NCSEA Webinar
www.wbdg.org
![Page 19: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
More
Less
Avai
labl
e C
riter
ia
More
Less
Allo
wab
le D
amag
e
Blast-Resistant Design Criteria
• Government (Anti-Terrorism & Force Protection)– Department of Defense (DoD UFC)– Veteran Affairs (VA)– General Services Administration (GSA ISC)– Department of State (DoS)
• Industry– Petrochemical (ASCE book)– Airports (FAA/TSA)– Energy and Industrial (Power)– Data Centers
August 2016 19NCSEA Webinar
![Page 20: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
ATFP Design• Goal: prevent loss of life by allowing significant
damage to the structure• Available Criteria: well developed design loads and
response limits for each government agency
August 2016 20NCSEA Webinar
VLLOP LLOP
![Page 21: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
ATFP Design• Design Methods:
– Dynamic analysis• Single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF)
analysis• Finite element analysis (FEA)
– Dynamic testing• Replicate field application• Any deviations from test must be
analyzed– Design connections using static
analysis
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 21www.enclos.com
![Page 22: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
ATFP Design• Available Criteria:
– Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC) 4-010-01 DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings (October 2013)
– U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Physical Security Design Manual for VA Life-Safety Protected or Mission Critical Facilities (January 2015)
– The Risk Management Process for Federal Facilities: An Interagency Security Committee Standard (January 2016) for GSA federal facilities
– Department of State (DoS) Overseas Building Operations-International Code Supplement (OBO-ICS)
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 22
![Page 23: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
ATFP Design – DoD/UFC• Design Highlights:
– Blast engineer is required– Occupancy level important– Site plan is important – design blast
load based on applicable explosive weights (CWI or CWII) at the actual standoff distances
• Check for a controlled perimeter (CWI apply)• Nearest roadways and parking (CWII apply)
– Design wall, window, door, and roof components to meet applicable LOP for applicable blast loads
• Check conventional construction standoff distance and parameters for wall and roof designs
• Must design windows and doors
August 2016 23NCSEA Webinar
![Page 24: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
ATFP Design – VA PSDM• Design Highlights:
– Physical security specialist required
– Based on Life Safety or Mission Critical designation
– Set minimum design load of • GP1 with minimum 25-ft standoff (LS) • GP2 with minimum 50-ft standoff (MC)• Independent site layout
– Design wall, window, door, and roof components for specified response criteria
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 24
![Page 25: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
ATFP Design – GSA/ISC• Design Highlights:
– Blast engineer required for 100,000 GSF projects (new or renovations) or larger
– Based on Facility Security Level(FSL)
– Blast load based on Design Basis Threat at closest point to protected set back
• Site layout important– 90% of façade must meet
performance requirements • 10% can fail for given load scenario
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 25
![Page 26: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
• Goal: prevent loss of life and allow for continued operations (shelter-in-place), thus less damage allowed
• Available Criteria: response limits minimally developed for a narrow class of facades/structures, however loads must be determined from site studies
Petrochemical
– ASCE design guide: Design of Blast Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities (2010)
– Shelter-in-place requires doors, louvers, penetrations special design and equipment
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 26
![Page 27: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Energy and Industrial Hazards• Goal: prevent loss of life
and allow for continued operations (shelter-in-place), thus less damage allowed
• Available Criteria: – Specialized loads case by
case – vessel burst, reactive vessel burst, vapor cloud explosion, pool fire
– Can utilize response limits from petrochemical design resources
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 27
![Page 28: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Airports• Goal:
• Life safety and collapse prevention – landside
• Shelter in place - airside• Available Criteria:
– FAA/TSA– Process incorporates site
specific vulnerability assessment and local acceptance of risk
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 28
![Page 29: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Data Centers• Goal: allow for continued operations (shelter-in-
place), thus minimal damage allowed• Available Criteria:
– Loads case by case – often located in industrial (Class “B/C”) areas; envelope design includes forced entry, impact, blast (roadway incidents) and ballistic protection
– Can utilize response limits from petrochemical or ATFP design resources
– Critical that power and cooling stay operational; often requires secondary protection of power and HVAC feeds
– Typically little or no glazing
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 29
![Page 30: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Multi-Hazard Façade Design Loads Comparison
Traditional Loads Blast Loading
Design Load Type Static Pressure Dynamic Pressure-Impulse
Load Combinations IBC/ASCE7 Independent Load Case
Design Methods Static (LRFD, ASD) Dynamic (Ultimate)
Allowable Response Elastic Inelastic / Plastic
Material Strengths Lower Bound* Expected (SIF and DIF)
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 30
![Page 31: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Multi-Hazard FaçadeCommon Design Approach
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 31
![Page 32: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Multi-Hazard FaçadeRecommended Design Approach
Grouping by task rather than by discipline
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 32
![Page 33: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Multi-Hazard FaçadePotential Design Conflicts
1. Façade mass2. Member strength and stiffness3. Impact resistance requirements4. “Non-structural” components5. Accommodating movement6. Incomplete Specifications
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 33
![Page 34: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Façade Mass
August 2016
Seismic Blast
Low HighDesign loads are
proportional to weight
0.4
Inertial resistance is proportional to weight
NCSEA Webinar 34
![Page 35: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Façade Mass
August 2016
Structural Engineer (Seismic)
Light façade mass
Provide EIFS on CFSS
Reaction at diaphragm…0.4 5 psf EIFS
10-ft
Trib
Wid
th
150.4 0.6 1.25 50
NCSEA Webinar 35
![Page 36: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Façade Mass
August 2016
Structural Engineer (Seismic)
Heavy façade mass
Provide 4-in. brick on CFSS
Reaction at diaphragm…0.4
40 psf Brick
10-ft
Trib
Wid
th
800% INCREASE1200.4 0.6 1.25 400
NCSEA Webinar 36
![Page 37: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Case B: Gr. 50 Steel Studs with 4-in BrickSupported Weight ~40psf
Required studs for CWII at 50-ft and LLOP
600S200-54 at 16 in O.C
Connection forces: 3kip
Case A: Gr. 50 Steel Studs with EIFSSupported Weight ~10psf
Required studs for CWII at 50-ft and LLOP
600S200-97 at 16 in O.C
Connection forces: 16kip!!
14-ft14-ft
Façade Mass
August 2016
Blast Engineer
NCSEA Webinar 37
![Page 38: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Member Strength & Stiffness
August 2016 38NCSEA Webinar
Blast Seismic Wind
Low Depends High
Plastic design and resistance through ductility
Elastic design and serviceability requirements
Ductile LFRS – High EQ Non-Ductile LFRS – Low EQ
![Page 39: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Member Strength & StiffnessParticularly for long-span slender members…• Wind serviceability
requirements govern stiffness
• Unnecessarily strong sections result
• Blast reactions quickly become excessive due to “capacity design”
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 39
![Page 40: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Impact ResistanceParticularly in coastal regions, wind-borne debris impact resistance is required…• Heavy laminated or
polycarbonate systems are required for missile impact
• Blast reaction forces necessitate heavy connections and/or additional support framing
August 2016
FEMA P361
NCSEA Webinar 40
![Page 41: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Impact Resistance
August 2016
72”x48” with 0.03pvb
72”x48” with 0.09pvb
Supporting Frame
NCSEA Webinar 41
![Page 42: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Pressure (10x)
Coupled Glazing Analysis• Can help reduce reactions…
August 2016 42NCSEA Webinar
![Page 43: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
“Non-Structural” ComponentsComponents detailed by the Architect that are required to resist significant lateral loads for blast.• Architectural knee walls• Non-loadbearing stud walls• Etc.
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 43
![Page 44: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
“Non-Structural” ComponentsCantilever Knee Walls
August 2016 44NCSEA Webinar
~0
![Page 45: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
“Non-Structural” ComponentsNon-Load-Bearing Stud Walls
August 2016
Notch for stud bearing
Good
NCSEA Webinar 45
![Page 46: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Accommodating Movement• Façade elements must accommodate the
relative displacements of the structure • May be required to prevent load transfer
(ex: “wind only" connections)• Potential sources of movement:
– Seismic lateral drift – Wind deformations– Live load deflections– Thermal movements– Etc.
August 2016 46NCSEA Webinar
![Page 47: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Accommodating Movement
August 2016
Vertical Slots to Prevent Gravity Load Transfer
Horizontal Slots to Allow Lateral
Sway Displacement
Vertical Live Load Deflections taken at
Stack Joints (not shown)
NCSEA Webinar 47
![Page 48: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Accommodating Movement• Potential issues when allowing for
movement in a connection– Decreased edge distances– Increased or variable eccentricities– Reduced sections at slots– Larger connections– Etc.
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 48
![Page 49: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Incomplete Specifications• Architectural components are typically
addressed through delegated design– Window systems– Doors– Cold formed steel stud walls or roof trusses– Precast panels
• Requires adequate performance based or prescriptive specifications
August 2016 49NCSEA Webinar
![Page 50: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Incomplete Specifications• What to look for or include:
– Applicable design loads– Allowed methods of analysis or testing– Acceptance criteria – Specialty requirements
• hurricane impact, ballistic, forced entry…– Defined submittal requirements
• Shop drawings + calculations and/or test reports– Experience requirements for subcontractors
August 2016 50NCSEA Webinar
![Page 51: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Tips for Blast Design• Recommend dynamic analysis for
façade component design – Most economic solution for blast– Blast loads do not always control
• Design connections statically for flexural capacity of component – Blast reactions typically control– Properly accommodate movement
August 2016 51NCSEA Webinar
![Page 52: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Tips for Blast Design
Dynamic Testing Options
August 2016
www.enclos.com
Shock Tube
FEA
ComplexSimple
Blast Tests
SDOF Dynamic Analysis Tools
Façade Complexity
NCSEA Webinar 52
![Page 53: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Complex Façade Design• Finite element analysis for blast
August 2016 53NCSEA Webinar
smugmug
![Page 54: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Complex Façade Design
August 2016 54NCSEA Webinar
• Finite element analysis for wind-borne debris impact
![Page 55: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Conclusions• There are many government and
industry criteria available for design of envelope components against blast loads– Generally less defined criteria results in
more restrictive design requirements • Coordinate early and understand all the
applicable requirements of your project– Impact, seismic, blast, etc.
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 55
![Page 56: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Conclusions• Group work design by task not discipline
– Accommodate serviceability requirements before designing for strength
– Different load cases will control different aspects of the design
• Complex facades require advanced analysis tools or testing– Take advantage of dynamic analysis for blast– Account for coupled response in design
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 56
![Page 57: Multi-Hazard Design of Blast-Resistant Façades](https://reader031.vdocuments.site/reader031/viewer/2022011801/61d301b814003f2ec8089c9c/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Questions?Carrie Davis, P.E., PrincipalProtection Engineering Consultants512-380-1988x305cdavis@protection-consultants.comwww.protection-consultants.com
August 2016 NCSEA Webinar 57