muji's alternative entry mode (international business strategies)
TRANSCRIPT
Muji’s
Alternative
Entry Modes
Amine Berrada April 2, 2014
1
Entry mode strategies
Alternative 1: Greenfield.
Chile is considered one of the most attractive countries in retailing especially because of the economic
condition that is growing continuously due to the political stability (Euromonitor, 2014) . The
consumption habits of the population is the main cause that enhance the desire to enter the country,
especially that the middle class that represents 60% of the population, are changing their consumers
habits from products providing convenience, to others that are turned to fashion and design
(euromonitor, 2014).Also, the high price sensitiveness of the consumers leaves the market in a high
competitiveness, especially that all companies are trying to develop their own premium private label
(most of the time proposing a reasonable quality/Price report) (Revised) (Euromonitor, 2014).
Moreover, Chilean consumers are characterized by having high levels of debts from the retail industry,
which means that they preserve a certain loyalty toward the store that they are purchasing from
(Euromonitor,2014).
The first alternative identifies the possibility for Muji to enter the market place by adopting the
Greenfield mode of entry. Greenfield is adopted by implementing direct managed stores in Chile.
Those stores are directly related to the headquarters, and the decisions are subject to centralization
(all taken by the headquarters in Japan). However, only daily and operational decisions are
decentralized and taken by the employees working in stores.
Because the firm has an international experience, it has developed a specific strategy that is
concentrated around sourcing the products from manufacturing to the host countries. The graph
below shows the sequence of providing the stores by Muji’s products.
2
Figure: Development of global sourcing and logistics systems by Muji.
All supplies are going from the manufacturing centers that are located in China and Singapore to Chile.
The strategic economic partnership agreement signed between both countries allows the free
circulation of goods which is not impacting the logistics strategy of the company ( revised) (Ministry of
foreign affairs of Japan, 2014). Muji’s target is the middle and high social class that represents the
majority of the population (Revised -Bargaining power of Buyers).
The international strategy that Muji is adopting is global. Since it started its internationalization, the
global strategy was a key to target multiple markets (Asian and European) (Dawson & Mukoyama,
2013). By standardizing its products, the company starts registering greater economies of scales, a
facilitation of international exchange of goods and services and availability of products in stock
(Dawson & Mukoyama, 2013).
Muji’s corporate strategic direction is represented by an organizational growth. The organizational
growth is formulated by a diversification strategy focused on the option of developing its market
through an expansion. The markets explorations allow the company to serve additional geographic
areas that were not served by the firm (Dawson & Mukoyama, 2013). Consequently, it is a way to
increase sales revenues and profits, fully utilize the existing resources and capabilities and make a
good use of the surplus cash flows
Muji’s business level is focusing on an integrated low-cost/ differentiation strategy. The combination
of these two strategies is becoming more popular for global companies as long as they provide
3
products that are differentiated from company’s host market, but also try to continuously lower costs.
The integrated low-cost strategy is formulated via the three following points:
Muji uses industrial materials that are not commonly used by other companies. These
materials are available at low cost and in bulk. Their advantage is to keep the prices low and
also enables the creation of distinctive and simple products (Dawson & Mukoyama, 2013).
Utilization of efficient production processes by paying close attention to the manufacturing
processes (Dawson & Mukoyama, 2013).
Keeping packaging to a bare minimum to minimize cost and waste (Dawson & Mukoyama,
2013).
Issues Greenfield :
Degree of rivalry: In industries with intense competition, new entrants would find it difficult to
enter and operate successfully (Elango et al, 2004). In the industry with high concentration
where numbers of competitors exists, the creation of new capacity could lead to a price war
between the incumbents and entrants. Also, the high concentration enhances the possibility of
retaliation by existing incumbents (Elango et al, 2004). Muji is trying to enter a market that is
dominated by national retailers that have good knowledge given by their longstanding
presence over 10 to 15 years average (Revised) (Euromonitor, 2014). Also, the Chilean market
is characterized by a continuous growth over the past 5 years, and a recent rate of 10% for
2013, whereas the rivals are highly committed to the business so they gain market shares
(Revised) (Euromonitor, 2014). By consideration the high degree of rivalry and the high growth
rate of the market, Muji is trying to enter a market where there is a moderate degree of
rivalry.
For the market characterized by intensed import activity, Greenfield alternative is suitable for
new entrants (Elango et al, 2004). Economic partnership agreements between both countries
(Japan and Chile) are incentives for entrants that are looking to import products to Chile
(Revised) (Euromonitor, 2014). However, the Greenfield alternative for Muji is focusing on
importing products from the manufacturing areas which represents an advantage (As
described earlier).
Entry Barriers: The economies of scale are a result of an expansion to a larger market where
the products can be sold. The benefits come from the fact that the company produces more
products with a lower cost. According to Elango et al (2004), industries characterized by plant
4
scale economies have significant barriers of entry, as long as they have significant investments
and strong competitive reaction from incumbents. Also, the companies while entering the
market by using Greenfield as an entry mode, they have financial responsibilities that are
considered as sunk costs (Elango et al, 2004). The Muji’s alternative strategy is to implement
stores and not factories to produce its products. Plant economies of scale are not related to
Muji because it produces in its main factories, but it is impacting it positively because it will
make economies of scale by producing more products to market in Chile.
Demand conditions: According to Elango et al (2004), incumbents are less likely to engage a
price war or react against new entrants in a growing market, due to the fact that all firms have
the opportunity to grow without fighting to gain market share. The cause is that the industry
with a growing demand is able to absorb additional capacity. The opposite happens when the
growth rate is low, the rivalry between competitors is intense going to the point to create a
price battle. Beside the growth rate described before, the impact of internet retailing helped
companies increase their sales as long as the Chileans become more connected and companies
offer expanded product information, beside the deals for shopping online (Revised)
(euromonitor, 2014). The demand variability is impacting the year to year shipment of product
that are imported from the sources, and the frequent changes in demand enhance level of
operational risks related to inventories, the principal rigidity of Muji.
Brouthers and Brouthers (2001) in their journal article “Acquisition and Greenfield start up?
Institutional, Cultural and Transactional Cost Influences” develop and test which of the model of
diversification is the more convenient, taking into consideration institutional (includes tangible and
intangible assets), cultural and transaction cost variables.
From the Institutional side, the hypothesis developed by Brouthers & Brouthers (2001) discuss about
the size of the investment that a company is projecting. Talking about intangible assets, the authors
advance that multinational experience and technology intensity are the main points that influence the
choice for opting for the Greenfield option. They said that firms with a higher multinational experience
prefer Greenfield because it gives some advantages like the opportunity to gain greater returns for
propriety knowledge and ability to guard against dissemination risks. The technological intensity
focuses around the research and development activity. Muji started its international activities 2 years
after its creation, and developed its business for a period of 30 years (Euromonitor, 2014). The
international experience plays an essential role because the company knows how to deal with new
markets. The research and development is an activity that Muji is engaged to maintain, since the
5
marketed products are related to fashion and new trends (Dawson & Mukoyama, 2013). The R&D is
not related to the strategy since only Greenfield is only focusing on the implementation of stores.
Brouthers and Brouthers (2001) consider cultural context as a key factor that helps defining potential
profits and risks associated with market entry. Hypothesis developed are related principally to
investments risk (economic, legal, political, institutional and cultural ) and market growth. The growth
rate is seen as element that companies have to look for before entering any market, and also the
cultural distance that there is between both countries. The cultural differences act to increase and
decrease managerial effectiveness in using firm-specific advantages in a specific location (Brouthers &
Brouthers, 2000). Small cultural differences perceive low levels of country risk, while a large cultural
difference enhances the level of country risks. The cultural difference between Japan and Chile are not
too different taking into consideration the uncertainty avoidance and the power distance are almost
similar (Hofstede, 2014).Since Muji has an international experience and produces products that suits
international consumers (not only Japanese), the cultural impact is very low.
From the transaction costs side, Brouthers & Brouthers report that diversified firms dislike Greenfield
because they have sophisticated management control systems that can provide organizational
efficiency. Another point is that, in a culture that is characterized to have high uncertainty avoidance,
organization tends to adopt for Greenfield mode because, by acquiring a company, the managers are
not psychologically prepared to handle the differences in an effective and eff icient manner; and also
employees are less willing to accept change, which results in more costs in managing the change.
Greenfield is more appropriate in uncertainty avoidance country like the chilean market that score 86
in UAI of Hofstede index (Hofstede, 2014). Moreover, Greenfield mode is preferred because of the
synergy achievement that represents a real obstacle for multinational companies. The transfer of
firm’s specific knowledge and technology is better with Greenfield because of the increased ability of
control (Brouthers & Brouthers, 2000).
Joint Venture with Chilemat:
Arrangements
The second alternative identifies the possibility for Muji to enter the market place by adopting the
Equity Joint venture mode of entry. The company selected for the operation is Chilemat which is
operating in different activities such as bath & kitchen, Home furniture and decor (Chilemat.cl, 2014).
The company’s core function is to act as an intermediary with intentions to satisfy the purchase needs
of its member (Chilemat.cl, 2014). The chain has a wide and solid network of suppliers, mainly focusing
6
on the local supply (Chilemat.cl, 2014). Furthermore, the company offers more than 300.000 products
through its providers (Chilemat.cl, 2014). The company relies on resources such as the local and
worldwide suppliers’ relationship, information transparence, technological applications, distribution
Centre, human resources and restoration of facilities to conducts its operations (Chilemat.cl, 2014).
Through the resources provided, the capabilities are resumed in effective supply chain coordination,
number of products offered, number points of sale (via a merger with an important group of
companies from the retail area to ultimately have better commercial conditions) , cash flow
management and marketing strategy developed via a network of more than 124 businesses
(Chilemat.cl, 2014). The core competencies of the company are focused on a strong sales volume and a
good financial performance, logistics and distribution systems and IT systems (Chilemat.cl, 2014). the
market competencies are resumed in a better customer service through the numbers points of sales
and the national presence, a brand recognition because it serves more than 300.000 products, product
availability through the performant logistic and distribution system and IT system. The choice of the
Chilemat was obvious because it is covering the rigidities of Muji that are the IT systems, logistics and
distribution and unavailable stock items. Moreover, the home furniture and décor sales of Chilemat is
the lowest of its activity, and making a joint venture with Muji has a positive impact in boosting the
activity.
Strategies :
The International (global strategy), corporate (organizational growth) and business level (low-cost/
differentiation) strategies remains the same as the one of Greenfield entry mode.
Joint venture Issues :
Beamish (2011) has listed in his chapter “The Design and Management of International Joint Ventures”
a number of issues related to the decision of choosing joint venture as an entry mode. Those issues
present advantages and disadvantages, related principally to the nature of the company, and its
purpose of entering the host market.
Numbers of multinational companies are looking to strengthen the existing business by opting for a
joint venture. Achieving economies of scale via acquiring the needed technology and know-how, and
venture by reducing the major risks of projects. Economies of scale are given to the joint venture
parents via the raw materials, components supply, in research and development and marketing and
distribution. Forming this network gives an ease to enter and exit the market, but also required a
limited investment (In time and fees) (Beamish, 2011). The joint venture with Chilemat covers the
7
rigidities that Muji in term of inventory management, distribution channels and IT systems. Fees
related to investment are divided with the partners, and also it is avoiding the issue of time
consumption.
The raw materials and component supply are another issue that Beamish (2000) took into account.
Manufacturers sometimes join their efforts to manufacture components. However, even if the results
are typically in cost savings and risk low, there are some other disadvantages that come out like the
slow process to take decisions because both companies have to agree or disagree about an issue
(Beamish, 2000).
Price transferring is another issue that arises in joint ventures (Beamish, 2000). A low transfer price on
products from venture to the parents means that whichever of them that buy the most get the most
benefits (Beamish, 2000). On the other side, some companies point out that the weight in shares hold
in the capital is the most appropriate way to share the economic benefits via the dividends distributed
the parents. As long as the shares obtained by a parent represent its contribution at the venture, it is
reasonable to follow the arrangement of the capital structure of the firms (Beamish, 2000). As long as
the joint venture between both companies (Muji & Chilemat) is an equity joint venture, the price
transferring is not a relevant issue because they share the profits made.
Marketing and Distribution is another issue that companies have to take into consideration when
forming a merger (Beamish, 2000). For the case of Muji, the merger is made principally to cover the
need in marketing and distribution. The experience of the local company has an impact in filling the
rigidities that Muji has. However, companies do not realize only economies in marketing and
distribution, but also cover the market wider with a lower cost without losing the direct control over
the sales force.
The financial risk is another issue that companies deal with while entering a foreign market. The
advantages and disadvantages depend on the nature of the activity and the importance of the project
taken. The case of Muji is to market its product in Chile, and earning experience and market shares by
limiting the financial risks and failures, are the aim to obtain from a joint venture. Another thing is that
the joint venture allows international company to keep close the competitor at least until having a
small pie from the market (Beamish, 2000).
Taking the products to a foreign market is the case of our particular company. The joint venture with
the local company seems to be the most attractive compromise (Beamish, 2000). The joint venture
starts as a sales and marketing operation, until the products starts to sell well and volumes rise. The
local partner also takes advantage of the joint venture to get a better utilization of existing plants and
8
distribution channels, to protect itself against threatening new technologies, and to drive new growth.
Moreover, the foreign partner makes profits shipping finished products to joint venture because they
are considered as hard currency (Beamish, 2000). The foreign partner receives also a technology fee,
which is a fixed percentage from the sales volume of the joint venture, but also pays a withholding tax
from the dividends received (Beamish, 2000).
Beamish & Lupton(2009) In their article “Managing Joint ventures” indicates that joint ventures enable
firms to access each other’s complementary resources and capabilities in order to achieve economies
of scope and scale, to develop the products more reliably and more cheaply than could done by a firm
acting alone. Local partners are helped through their adventure to get use to foreign business
practices and policies, and develop their credibility in the eyes of the local customers.
The knowledge management (knowledge and capabilities) is considered by Beamish & Lupton (2009)
as an important issue that the joint venture parents have to take into consideration. The knowledge
refers to the intellectual capital or to the market knowledge, while capabilities refer to the research
and development (Beamish & Lupton, 2009). However, accessing the local knowledge improves the
Joint Venture performance, as long as in the long run, learning enhance s the competitive advantage.
Local firms open the market and allow to multinational firms to have access to the business practice
expertise and to develop local access talent (Beamish & Lupton, 2009). Also, It was found that it is
much more easier to transfer technological capabilities by joint venture because it uses the transfer of
personal directly the JV instead of transferring the employees tacit capabilities from an organization to
another (Beamish & Lupton, 2009). However, while knowledge is very important for a joint venture to
be successful, there are some firms that are concerned about protecting their intellectual property and
trade secrets. Firms, especially the ones operating in new or operating segments, are taking benefits of
the joint ventures just to limit the risks of a riskier research and development where the outcomes are
uncertain (Beamish & Lupton, 2009). Also, the companies take more time to build trust and to adapt to
each other, which takes longer to produce or share the knowledge. Moreover, Beamish & Lupton
(2009) argue that joint venture is advantageous when both companies’ capabilities and resources
complement each other, in order to have a good performance. Firms that replicate the Joint Venture
management process would be able to develop core competencies by collecting, codifying and
disseminating their best practices in Joint venture management throughout the organization (Beamish
& Lupton, 2009).
Cultural differences are issues that Beamish & Lupton (2009) are discussing in details in their article.
International companies forming the joint venture with a local firm are always facing a cultural shock
that comes from the market, or from the partner. Culture differences, as described by the authors, is
9
primary related to the characteristics of the countries such as the individualism, power distance and
uncertainty avoidance (Beamish & Lupton, 2009).Companies may found differences in the
organizational culture (different management approaches) and differences in national culture, which
can affect the performance and the longitude of the partnership.
Franchising with Masisa :
Arrangements
The third alternative identifies the possibility for Muji to enter the market place by adopting the
franchising mode of entry. The company selected is Masisa S.A. which is producing and marketing
wood articles and fiber boards for furniture and interior architecture in Latin America (Masisa, 2014).
Masisa S.A is a subsidiary of Placacentro Group which has network business units that guarantees the
success of the core business (Masisa, 2014). The company focuses on satisfying the final customer by
providing sustainable and trustable articles through its fiber wood boards and industry (Masisa, 2014).
The company has a significant presence in South America, and its supply chain management and
distribution channels are the main factors that are leading its success (Masisa annual report, 2013).
The company is present in Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Equator, Mexico, Peru, USA and
Venezuela. The firms have a large panel of suppliers that are providing it. The aim of choosing Masisa
as a franchisee is that the company wants to diversify its core business, as long as it is a
complementary segment. Moreover, the benefits of the Franchise contract are to take advantage of
the distribution channels of the company which is concentrated in Latin America, the international
experience and the supply chain management applied for its products.
Strategies
The International (global strategy), corporate (organizational growth) and business level (low-cost/
differentiation) strategies remains the same as the one of Greenfield and Joint Venture entry mode.
The reason why it remains the same over the entry modes is because Muji has an international
experience and has used the different entry mode for all its attempts. So the Strategies are formulated
to be adapted for all entry modes.
Franchising Issues According to Hoffman (2001), the diffusion of franchising as an entry mode in nations, is positively
related to monitoring nations. Large franchise systems can develop economies of scale by effectively
lowering the cost per unit of monitoring franchisee or by making promotions (Hoffman, 2001). The
experience of seeking other markets and expand acquire to the firms knowledge about foreign
10
markets. It first reduces the degree of perceived risks of distant markets, but also gain experience in
making limited adaptation to the franchise concept for international firms by operating the system
efficiently and make easier the monitoring of dispersed units (Hoffman, 2001). The rivalry between the
local and foreign franchisors in a special market pushes the locals to make more effort to protect their
product, but also to duplicate the successful franchising methods.
The countries’ characteristics play an essential role in formulating the adequate mode of entry. The
economic condition of a country is one of the issues that Hoffman (2009) discussed about. A country
that is registering a higher per capita income boosts the franchise growth because can afford the
products and services without bothering themselves doing them (Hoffman, 2001). The Chilean GDP
per capita which is $15.410 and is increasing by 5.6% compared to 2013 (World Bank, 2013). The
Chilean peso and inflation rate have been stable for a long period of time, due principally to the
stability of the monetary institutions (Heritage, 2014). All these economic factors play a role to
enhance the plantation of franchises because the population starts consuming more when their
income grows.
Social trends are also factors influencing the lifestyle of consumers. Hoffman (2009) has found that
social changes impact positively the growth of a franchise. Urbanization, education, the increase of the
middle class population and women in labor force are special environmental characteristics that a f irm
must look for before implementing any strategy. Education is an important issue because it measures
the degree of awareness, and enhances the ability of the population for decoding a message (Hoffman,
2001). Urbanization is another factor that influences the franchise option because people in urban
areas use their wages to buy products, compared to rural areas where the population is self-sufficient
(Hoffman, 2001). About 85% of the people live in urban areas and nearly 40% live in the capital city
“Santiago” (CIA Factbook, 2014).
Cultural issues are factors that companies encounter when they go oversea, especially when the
values, customs and patterns of behavior and thoughts are different (Hoffman, 2001). Hofstede (2001)
research about cultural differences is taken into consideration because they align the perceived risks
of crossing border. Tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty avoidance and individualism influence the
choice of the entry mode. More the country is low in uncertainty avoidance and individualistic, the
more people tend to adopt franchising as an entry mode (Hoffman, 2001).
Political sector that includes the government regulations and policies interferes in selecting franchise
as an entry mode (Hoffman, 2001). Taxes, Tariffs and currency are determinants that increase risk or
lower it, depending on the import and export tax border, the royalties repartition or profitability
(Hoffman, 2001). Chilean government made reforms to improve capital market liquidity and to
11
enhance access to financial services for small companies (Heritage, 2014). However, Chile does not
provide any incentives for the tax reforms or tariifs (foreign investors are treated like the local ones),
but it allows the repatriate capital after one year of the entry and profits at any time (OCDE, 2002).
Doherty (2007) developed in the article “the internationalization of retailing: Factors influencing the
choice of franchising as a market entry mode” the key factors that lead the managers to select
franchising as an entry mode. The organizational factors such as the international experience influence
the choice of the company. Franchising has been profitable for firms as long as they move forward
internationally. Franchisees by recognizing the brand value, start approaching franchisor for settling
contracts (Doherty, 2007).
The availability of financial resources is a factor advanced by Doherty (2007). The companies start
expanding abroad with a limited financial commitment and exposure, and without having the
responsibility to manage a lot of assets (Doherty, 2007). The franchisees take the responsibility of
financing the settlement of the brand, but also pay royalty to the franchisor.
Furthermore, companies with a strong brand offers are much easier to replicate that firms with
weaker brands offerings (Doherty, 2007). International franchises become more attractive to
franchisees when it develops a brand image, and starts to be recognizable by the final consumers. The
international power of the brand is the key for success, and controlling it is very important (Doherty,
2007).
Recommendation: Based on the previous sections where we advanced a number of issues concerning each
alternative, time has come to choose the best alternative for Muji. However before starting analyses,
the table below summarizes the issues of each alternative.
12
Mode of entry Authors Issues
Greenfield
Elango et al, 2004
Brouthers & Brouthers
(2001)
Degree of rivalry
Entry Barriers
Demand Conditions
Size of the investment
Investment risks
Multinational Experience
Technology Intensity
Cultural Context
Market Growth
Transaction costs
Transfer of knowledge
Joint Venture Beamish (2011)
Beamish & Lupton (2009)
Achieving Economies of scale
Strengthen existing Business
Raw Materials & components supply
Price transferring
Marketing & Distribution
Financial risk
Access to the resources & capabilities of the partner
Knowledge management
Cultural Differences
Franchising Hoffman (2001)
Doherty (2007)
Economies of scale
Country’s characteristics
Urbanization
Education
Cultural Issues
Political issues
International experience
Availability of financial resources
Based on the issues that the articles provided, the selection of the most adequate alternative results
for the number of advantages and disadvantages, the order of importance of each issue, and harmony
of the entry mode with the activity (Retail).
13
Greenfield is considered as the riskiest alternative. First, even if Muji has an international experience
all over the continents, but it does not have any physical presence in all Latin American countries. The
population does not recognize the brand and the risk to have cultural differences is high. Also, there is
a risk in terms of interpreting the values and concepts of the firm by the local population, but also
needs extra investment for the knowledge transfer (training of the employees). The Chilean market
has a moderate degree of rivalry because of the presence of a high concentration and high growth rate
of the market (Revised) (Euromonitor, 2014). In terms of costs, it is the most expensive one because
the company relies on its own financial resources. The time to implement such a strategy takes
normally a long time due to the studies that the company does before entering the country. Moreover,
Muji still have to cover its rigidities that are related to logistics and IT systems.
Franchising comes in the second ranking of the best alternative to choose. The company by adopting
the franchising mode will realize economies of scale by producing more products for the new market.
Furthermore, the financial costs are low because the franchisee brings the financial resources and
invest in the project, while in the order side, Muji receives royalties. The time that implement the
project is very short because the franchisee is a local firm, and has the experience in the market
(Knows the cultural differences). However, the disadvantage is that the company does not represent a
strong brand for the Chilean consumers because it is new for them. Also, the risk of the company to be
misrepresented by the franchisee is high because they do not share the same cultural values.
Joint Venture is the alternative chosen for Muji as the best entry mode. First, the company’s rigidities
are covered by the Chilemat which has a strong supply chain management, plant and facilities, and an
effective IT system. Muji can learn from the knowledge of Chilemat, and develop its technology to be
better in terms of management and strengthen its existing business. Also, the financial costs are
divided between the partners which leads to conclude that there is less financial risks. The company is
achieving economies of scale because it has a new market where it can sell more products . Muji is
going to benefit from the network of the partner to expand its activities all over the area, but also it is
an occasion to learn from the partner and the market about the cultural differences and the different
needs of the customer. Muji, by being present in the market, implements correctly the values and
concept of the company which has a significant impact on the brand image of the firm. However, the
only disadvantage is the cultural differences between the partners that often lead to take a long time
making decision, but also to disagreements about the management.
14
References:
Beamish, P & Lupton, N 2009, Managing joint ventures. Academy of Management Perspectives. May
2009, Vol. 23 Issue 2, p75-94.
Beamish, P 2011. The Design and Management of International Joint Ventures. Transnational
Management: Text, Cases, and Readings in Cross-Border Management, 5th Edition, McGraw-Hill
Companies Press
Brouthers, K. & and Brouthers, L, 2000. Acquisition or Greenfield Start Up ? Institutional , Cultural and
Transaction Cost Influences. Strategic Management Journal, pp. 89-97
CIA Factbook, 2014. The World Factbook. [online] Available at:
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ci.html [Accessed: 4 Feb 2014].
Chilemat S.A, 2014, (online) Available at : www.chilemat.cl (Accessed 30 March 2014)
Doherty,A 2007. The Internationalization of Retailing : Factors influencing the choice of Franchising as
a market entry strategy. International Journal of Service Industry Management. Vol. 18 N°2, 2007. Pp:
184-205
Dawson, J & Mukoyama, M. 2013, Global Strategies in Retailing : Asian and European Experiences, e -
book, accessed 02 April 2014, <http://VIU.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1461139>.
Euromonitor Passport 2014, Retailing in Chile, accessed 20 March 2014,
http://www.portal.euromonitor.com.ezproxy.viu.ca/Portal/Pages/Analysis/AnalysisPage.aspx
Elango et al 2004, The influence of industry structure on the entry mode choice of overseas entrants in
manufacturing industries, Journal of International Management, Volume 10, Issue 1, 2004.
Ministry of foreign affairs of japan 2014, Japan Chile Economic Partnership Agreement . (Online)
Accessed 22 March 2014, http://www.mofa.go.jp/policy/economy/fta/chile.html
Heritage, 2014. Chile Economy: Population, GDP, Inflation, Business, Trade, FDI, Corruption . [online]
Available at: http://www.heritage.org/index/country/chile [Accessed: 4 Feb 2014].
Hoffman, R 2001. Global Diffusion of Franchising : A country level Examination. Multinational Business
Review. Spring 2001.
15
Hofstede Geert, 2014. Chile - Geert Hofstede. [online] Available at: http://geert-
hofstede.com/chile.html [Accessed: 7 Feb 2014].}
Masisa S.A., 2014, (Online) Available at : www.masisa.com(Accessed 30 March 2014) (Masisa, 2014).
OECD 2014. Chile:- Chile's accession to the OECD - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development. [online] Available at: http://www.oecd.org/chile/chilesaccessiontotheoecd.htm
[Accessed: 4 Feb 2014].
World Bank, 2014. Doing Business in Chile [online] Available at:
http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploreeconomies/chile/ [Accessed: 6 Feb 2014].