mucosal immunity-i
DESCRIPTION
Mucosal Immunity-I. Sarah Gaffen, Ph.D. Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology Spring 2009 [email protected]. Overview. Organization- what is a mucosal surface? Development, NALT, GALT etc Effectors IELs M cells IgA Commensal organisms Mucosal tolerance & homeostasis - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Mucosal Immunity-I
Sarah Gaffen, Ph.D.Division of Rheumatology & Clinical Immunology
Spring [email protected]
Overview
• Organization- what is a mucosal surface?– Development, NALT, GALT etc
• Effectors– IELs– M cells– IgA
• Commensal organisms• Mucosal tolerance & homeostasis• Mucosal diseases: lung, gut, mouth
Mucosal Immunity
• Comprises the “surface exposed” parts of the body (gut, mouth, genital tract, lung, eye, etc)
• Contrasts with “systemic immune system” (spleen, LN)
• Most infections start at mucosal surfaces• Probably the most evolutionarily ancient
Anatomical/Physical Barriers
• Skin - acidic, anti-microbial peptides• Mouth - enzymes, anti-microbial peptides,
directional flow of fluid to stomach• Stomach- low pH, digestive enzymes, fluid flow to
intestine• Large intestine -normal flora compete for niches• Airways and lungs- cilia, mucus, coughing/ sneezing,
macrophages in lung alveoli
Unique features of Mucosal I.S.• Close association of mucosal epithelial layers and
lymphoid structures– Diffuse or organized
• Specialized Ag-uptake mechanisms– Example: Microfold (M) cells in the gut
• Effectors– IgA– Specialized T’s, activated even w/o infection
• Strong immunosuppressive environment– Suppressive responses to commensals
Mucosal-Associated Lymphoid Tissue (MALT)
• Each mucosal surface has immune tissue, more or less organized– GALT (gut): Peyer’s Patches, appendix– NALT (nasopharynx): Adenoids, Tonsils– BALT (bronchial): iBALT– Genital tract? Not as clear, no lymphoid
follicles.
Antimicrobial Defenses of the Lung
• Structural Defenses– Glottis– Cough reflex– Airway secretions– Mucociliary transport
• Innate Defenses– Resident alveolar macrophages– Recruited polymorphonuclear leukocytes– Recruited monocytes
Prototypical mucosal surface: Gut• Largest mucosal surface• Specialized Ag-uptake• Large # of specialized lymphocytes• Villi- large surface area for nutrient exchange• Peyer’s Patch
– secondary lymphoid organs within wall of intestine– Rich in B cell follicles, smaller T cell areas– Surrounded by epithelium interspersed with
“microfold” (M) cells
M (microfold) Cells
• Transport antigens across the mucosal surface• Transport achieved via vesicles; “transcytosis”• Extensively folded – large surface area• Creates a “pocket” for DCs, lymphocytes• DC’s migrate to:
– T cell areas in PP– mesenteric LNs
• Can be exploited by pathogens to gain entry into
Blue=epithelial cellsRed = T cellsGreen = B cells
Luminal antigens are taken up by M cells and presented to T cells by
macrophages
EMBO reports 7, 7, 688–693 (2006)
Lymphocyte circulation in Mucosa
• Naïve lymphocytes that arrive at PP or mLNs enter via HEVs, just like other 2° organs
• If they are activated, they lose expression of CCR7 and L-selectin (which normally directs cells to peripheral LNs)
• They gain expression of the 4:7 integrin, which binds to “MAdCAM-1” on gut (and other mucosal) endothelial cells
• They also express CCR6, CCR9 and CCR10, which directs them to gut
Adhesion molecules in the Integrin family are heterodimers sharing similar
and chains
1 Integrins 2 Integrins 3-7 Integrins
VLA-4
4, 1
LFA-1
L, 2
MAC-1CD11b, CD18M, 2
4, 7
Initial steps in leukocyte migration are mediated by interactions with
endothelium
Selectin dep.Integrin dep
CCR6CCL20
“Common Mucosal Immune System”
• Lymphocytes primed at one mucosal area can recirculate to other mucosal surfaces
• This is because MAdCAM-1, mucosal chemokines are expressed on vasculature of other mucosal sites
• Therefore, priming at one site can provide protection at another– e.g. Immunization in the nose can protect against
infection in lung (flu)
The “Common” Mucosal Immune System
M cell
M M M
SIgA
Mucosal inductive site
Organized mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)
Antigen
B
BB
B
BB
B
T
TT
T
TT
T
FDC
B
Endothelial gatekeeper function
SIgM (IgG)
Mucosal effector site
HEV
IgG(J)
CD8
APC
CD4
B
pIgR
(SC)
APC
B
DC
Naivecells
Lymphatic vessel
T
Antigen
IgA+J
IgA+JIgM+J
B
Lymph node
Peripheral blood
Peyer's patches
Isolated lymphoid follicles (ILFs)
Appendix
Waldeyer's ring (NALT)
T
IgA
• The dominant class of Ab in the mucosal immune system
• Can exist in multiple forms– Serum- IgA is mostly monomer – Mucosa
• IgA is dimer linked by J chain• After transcytosis, associated with secretory
component
IgA is the most heterogeneous of Ig isotypes: 3 molecular forms
17%
52%
30%
1%
IgM IgG IgA IgD
13%
6%
80%
1%
>6 x 10 10 cells
Ig-producing cells in human tissues
~2.5 x 1010
cells
Mucosal Tissues
Gastrointestinal, respiratory,genito-urinary tracts; eyes;Salivary, lacrimal, mammary glands
Systemic Tissues
Bone marrow,lymph nodes, spleen
Daily production rates (mg) of IgA and IgG in humans (70kg adult)
Tissue/fluid IgA IgG
Circulation 1300 - 2100 2100
Saliva 100 - 200 1 - 2
Tears 1 - 5 ?
Bile 50 - 400 160
Intestine - small
- large
2100 - 5200
1200
600
140
Urine 1 - 3 1 - 3
Nasopharynx 45 15
Genital tract (F)
(M)
?
?
?
?
Total 4800 - 9000 3000
IgA
• Up to 5 GRAMS of IgA produced daily!• Certain pathogens can cleave IgA as a defense
mechanism• How does IgA get across? “Poly-Ig receptor”
– Remains tethered to “secretory component” =sIgA
• Class switching mediated by TGF• IgA-secreting B cells express 47, which binds
to MAdCAM-1 and directs them to mucosal tissues
Biological activities of IgA antibodies
mIgA pIgA S-IgA
Neutralization: Enzymes and toxins
Viruses
+
+
++
++
++
++
Inhibition of adherence/uptake at mucosae ++
pIgR-mediated transport across epithelium – ++
Intracellular viral neutralization – +
Comp. activation: Classical pathway
Alternative pathway
Lectin pathway
–
–
+
–
–
+
–
–
?
Phagocytosis via FcR (CD89) + ++ –
IgA
• Up to 5 GRAMS of IgA produced daily!• Certain pathogens can cleave IgA as a defense
mechanism• How does IgA get across? “Poly-Ig receptor”
– Remains tethered to “secretory component” =sIgA
• Class switching mediated by TGF• IgA-secreting B cells express 47 and CCR6,
which directs them to mucosal tissues
Figure 9-26IgA can prevent pathogen adherence to epithelium
Bacterial IgA Proteases-IgA Hinge Region
O O O O O | | | | |P V P S T P P T P S P S T P P T P S P S
Cl. ramosum
PrevotellaCapnocytophaga
Str. pneumoniaeStr. sanguisStr. oralisStr. mitisGemella haemolysans
H. influenzae 1H. aegyptius
H. influenzae 2H. parahaemolyticusN. gonorrhoeae 2N. meningitidis 2
N. gonorrhoeae 1N. meningitidis 1
IgA
• Up to 5 GRAMS of IgA produced daily!• Certain pathogens can cleave IgA as a defense
mechanism• How does IgA get across? “Poly-Ig receptor”
– Remains tethered to “secretory component” =sIgA
• Class switching mediated by TGF• IgA-secreting B cells express 47 and CCR6,
which directs them to mucosal tissues
IgA
• Up to 5 GRAMS of IgA produced daily!• Certain pathogens can cleave IgA as a defense
mechanism• How does IgA get across? “Poly-Ig receptor”
– Remains tethered to “secretory component” =sIgA
• Class switching mediated by TGF• IgA-secreting B cells express 47 and CCR6,
which directs them to mucosal tissues
TGF- is chiefly responsible for directing the IgA ‘switch’
IgA
• Up to 5 GRAMS of IgA produced daily!• Certain pathogens can cleave IgA as a defense
mechanism• How does IgA get across? “Poly-Ig receptor”
– Remains tethered to “secretory component” =sIgA
• Class switching mediated by TGF• IgA-secreting B cells express 47 and CCR6,
which directs them to mucosal tissues
Differential expression of chemokines in tissues explains distribution of T and B cells
between mucosal effector sites
Ontogenic development of mucosal immunity
• Newborn infants have virtually no S-IgA in secretionsbut all the cellular machinery is present:– SC in intestine by gestational day ~40– J chain+ B cells by day ~110– Mucosal T cells by day ~100-120– sIgA+ B cells in intestinal aggregates by day ~120– Peyer’s patches by day ~200
• Ag stimulation required to activate CMIS– colonization by commensal microbiota
NB: germ-free animals remain with poorly developed immune systems
Development of Igs in Infancy100
0
% r
el a
tive t
o a
dul t
level s
Placental transfer of IgG
Mucosal T or T-like cells
• Located in MALT, also scattered throughout• In the gut, found in:
– LAMINA PROPRIA– EPITHELIUM (intraepithelial lymphocytes, IELs)
• LP T cells: cause inflammation in disease– IBD, celiac disease (gluten allergy)– May be involved in tolerance
• IELs: 90% T cells, 80% are CD8+• High proportion of -T cells, IL-17+ cells
Mucosal T cells/IELs• High proportion have memory phenotype
– CD45RO (hu)– Gut homing markers (CCR6, CCR9, 4:7 integrin)
• Constitutively produce IFN, IL-10• IELs
– 80% are CD8+, 50% are form of CD8 (do not see conventional Ags+MHC, but Class Ib MHC)
– Many + T cells, high levels of NKG2D (induced in epithelial cells under stress) – repair? Danger?
– Intracellular granules with perforin, granzymes– Restricted VDJ usage
T cells in PP and lamina propria respond differently to antigens
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cellT-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
proliferation
Circulating memory cells
Peyer’s Patch
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cellT-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
proliferation
Circulating memory cells
Peyer’s Patch
Intestinal lamina propria
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cellT-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
Differentiated CD4 T cell
Naive CD4 T cell
Cytokines
B cell plasma cell
pIgA
Characteristics of Intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs)
• Large granular lymphocyte morphology• CD3+, CD8+• E, 7 integrin expression• TCR+ more common• Alternative pathways of activation• Produce IL-2, IFN-• Function: cytotoxic, immunoregulatory
CD4+ T-cells
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
APC
CD40
AgMHC
B7.2B7.1
T-cellT-cell
CD40L
TCRCD4
CTLA4CD28
TH2IL-4
IL-5
IL-10
TH1
IL-2
IFN-
TNF
IL-12IL-12
IFN-IFN-
IL-4IL-4
x
x
TGF-beta, IL-6, TGF-beta, IL-6, IL-23IL-23
TH17
IL-17A
IL-6
TNF
IL-22
x
Th17 cells in mucosal disease
• IL-17+ T cells can be both (classic Th17) or -T or NKT cells
• Th17 cells express CCR6 and CCL20• IL-17 and IL-22 also stimulate expression of
CCL20 in the epithelium, which amplifies recruitment to mucosal tissues
• Th17 cells protect from pathogens– Selectively depleted in HIV infection in gut
• Th17 cells cause inflammation in IBD, Crohn’s
IL23R
ATG16L1
3p21
5p13
IBD5
IRGM 10q21 NKX2-3
NOD2
PTPN2MHC
SBNO2
5q33
You are only 10% human!
• Humans = 1012 to 1013 cells• Flora: skin, gut, other mucosal sites: 1013 to
1014 bacteria
Oral Tolerance
• Oral tolerance is the generation of systemic immune unresponsiveness by feeding of antigen
• Oral tolerance is likely a mechanisms for prevention of harmful immune responses to harmless antigens such as foods
• Necessary to prevent excessive response to normal flora and food antigens
“Oral Tolerance” = mucosally induced systemic toleranceThe classic experiment:
1. Immunize a mouse i.p. with ovalbumin (OVA) in adjuvant develops CMI revealed by DTH reaction i.e. ear-swelling at 24-48h after test injection of OVA
2. First give OVA orally, then immunize i.p. DTH reaction to OVA is diminished
i.e., the mouse has been tolerized to OVA
3. First give bovine serum albumin (BSA) orally, then immunize i.p. with OVA
DTH reaction to OVA is NOT diminishedi.e., tolerance is Ag-specific!
NB: “oral tolerance” is most easily demonstrated in terms of T cell responses or DTH; systemic Ab responses are not so easily tolerized in this way.
A modern version of the same experiment:
Mice are first given naïve CD4+ T cells that transgenically express TCR specific for OVA peptide epitope.
After tolerance induction, it can beshown that such T cells have becomeanergized - they do not proliferatein response to OVA in vitro.
Smaller numbers of OVA-specific T cells also suggest some clonal deletion of these cells (especially at very high, nonphysiological Ag doses).
Limitations to Oral Tolerance
• Can be overcome with mucosal adjuvant (e.g. Cholera toxin)
• Alter physical characteristics of antigen: antigen in micro-spheres that target PP
• Feeding of attenuated enteric pathogen expressing the antigen (Salmonella)
Mucosal tolerance and mucosal antibody responses can coexist!
Spectrum of Mucosal Immune Spectrum of Mucosal Immune ResponsesResponsesSpectrum of Mucosal Immune Spectrum of Mucosal Immune ResponsesResponses
viable, aggressive toxins e.g. CT/CTB
bland, non-viable antigens
Food
killed organismsviable,
non-aggressive
Commensals Pathogens
Potent mucosal adjuvants e.g. CT
Mucosal Ab (S-IgA)
CMI
Systemic Ab(IgG>IgM,IgA)
Littleor noneLittle
or none
Suppressed‘oral tolerance’
Suppressed‘oral tolerance’
Moderate, while stimulus persists Moderate, while stimulus persists
??
Strong, persistentStrong,
persistent
Induced?Induced?
Strong, persistent
Strong, persistent
Littleor noneLittle
or noneLittle
or noneLittle
or none
Antigens:
Responses:
repeated high doses
The immune response is not something that happens only on those infrequent occasions when you inject yourself, or injure your skin.
It is constantly happening, mostly unregarded, as the bodyconfronts the commensal microbiota, and the mass of ‘foreign’ material consumed as food, or inhaled as dust.
Most of the time, the response seems to be: “Leave it alone, it is not harmful or threatening”;
or maybe:“Keep an eye on that, but don’t over-react”.
Yet, when necessary, the mucosal immune system can respond as vigorously as the circulatory immune system.