MSP Annual Performance Report: Online Instrument

MSP Regional Conferences

November, 2006 – February, 2007

Annual Process Annual report required by legislation

• Twelve months intervention reported (60 days to complete report)

• Project between 12-18 months-single report

Data input to begin at date of award Data to be reviewed and submitted

by state coordinator

General Content

Description of MSP Partners Partners Roles and Responsibilities Characteristics of MSP Participants Professional Development Models Program Evaluation Design Evaluation Findings and Evidence

Outcomes

Types of Data Input Short Response Text

• Names, email addresses, numbers

Narrative Text• Project description, evaluation structure, major

findings

Pull Down Menu Selections Radio Button Selections Table Completions

• Partner areas of responsibility

MSP Report Organization

Project Descriptive Information• Includes information on all partners• Contact information• Project abstract• Project Goals• Partner Responsibilities• Intervention target

• Individual teachers, schools, districts

MSP Report Organization

Participant Descriptive Information• Numbers• Grade levels• Subject areas• Specialties

• Special Ed, coaches, ESL, paraprofessionals, administrators

Professional Development Models• Activities

• Summer Institutes, on-site follow-up, study groups, distance learning networks, on-line work

• Duration• Subject areas and content

MSP Report Organization

MSP Report Organization Evaluation

• Brief Design Description• Evaluator Information• Evaluation Design Method

• Random assignment, matched comparison groups, non-matched comparison groups

• Outcome assessment measures• Teacher content knowledge, student achievement• Types of instrument

• Pretest, posttest, observation protocol, videos, journals

• Findings• Download of formal evaluations

MSP Report Organization Lessons Learned

• Implementation challenges/successes• Partnership Development• State level and local administrative support• Size and scope of project• Teacher participation• Meeting needs of teachers

• Evaluation Challenges• Data instruments• Data collection• Data analysis