mse 131 ceramics lecture 1 2016 student

Upload: jaqjaqlee

Post on 02-Mar-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    1/38

    MSE 131 CeramicsLecture 1

    Dr. Benjamin O. Chan

    Physics Department

    Ateneo de Manila University2016

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    2/38

    Types of Ceramics

    Traditional ceramicsAbrasive products, clay products, construction,

    glass, refractories, whitewares Industrial/Engineering/Advanced ceramics

    Automotive, aerospace, electronics, hightemperature, manufacturing, medical

    Fine ceramics Very small grain sizes

    Nanoceramics

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    3/38

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    4/38

    Ceramic Bonds

    Covalent

    Electrons shared betweenatoms

    Ionic One atom gives willingly, the other readily takes

    Extreme form of covalent bond

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    5/38

    Partially Covalent/Ionic Bonds

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    6/38

    Associated Crystal Structures

    Diatomic Structures

    Diamond/Zincblende

    CsCl

    NaCl

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    7/38

    Stability of Anion-Cation

    Configurations

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    8/38

    Stable Configurations I

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    9/38

    Determining Critical Size

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    10/38

    Stable Configurations II

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    11/38

    Some Ionic Radii

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    12/38

    Stable Crystal Structures

    Things to consider

    Difference in electronegativity

    Atomic bonding Stoichiometry

    r/R ratio

    Coordination number

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    13/38

    Example: MgO

    EN = 3.44-1.31 = 2.13 (68% ionic)

    Ionic Bond between Mg and O

    r(Mg2+

    ) = r = 0.078 nm r(O2-) = R = 0.132 nm

    r/R = 0.078/0.132 = 0.591

    CN = 6

    NaCl structure Diatomic FCC with

    octahedral sites filled bycations

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    14/38

    Example: CsI

    EN = 2.66 0.79 = 1.87

    58% ionic

    r/R = 0.167/0.220 = 0.76,CN = 8

    CsCl structure

    Diatomic simple cubicstructure with the bodycenter occupied by acation

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    15/38

    Example: GaAs

    EN = 2.18 1.81 = 0.37, 3% ionic

    metallic or covalent

    Valence = (3+5)/2 = 4 > 3Covalent bond

    CN = 8 Valence = 4

    Zincblende structure

    Diatomic FCC with thecation occupying

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    16/38

    What happens if the cationand anion are of the same

    size?

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    17/38

    Atomic Packing Factor: NaCl

    Fractional volume occupied by atoms

    r(Na+) = r = 0.098 nm

    r(Cl

    -

    ) = R = 0.181 nm

    APF = 66.3%

    3

    33

    3

    33

    )(3

    2

    8

    )3

    43

    4(4

    Rr

    Rr

    Rr

    Rr

    APF

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    18/38

    Density Calculation: CsCl

    r(Cs+) = 0.167 nm

    r(Cl-) = 0.181 nm

    AtWt(Cs+) = 132.9 g/mol

    At Wt(Cl-) = 35.45 g/mol M = (132.9g/6.023x1023) + (35.45/ 6.023x1023)

    = 2.8 x 10-22g

    V = ao3 = (2(0.167nm+0.181nm)/31/2)3

    = 6.49x 10-23

    cm3

    = M/V = 2.8x10-22g/ 6.49x 10-23cm3

    = 4.31 g/cm3

    *experimental density is 3.99 g/cm3

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    19/38

    Three or more atoms in the basis

    Fluorite (CaF2)

    Perovskite (BaTiO3)

    Crystobalite (SiO2)

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    20/38

    Silicates

    Main components are Si and O

    Consider arrangement of SiO44-

    tetrahedron

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    21/38

    Silica

    Every corner O in each tetrahedron is shared

    by adjacent tetrahedra

    Polymorphic forms: quartz, crystobalite,tridymite

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    22/38

    Silicates

    Corner atom shared by 1, 2 or 3 tetrahedra

    Cations (Ca2+, Mg2+,Al3+) compensate

    negative tetrahedral charge and bond themtogether

    a) Forsterite (Mg2SiO4)

    b) Akermanite

    (Ca2MgSi2O7)

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    23/38

    Layered Silicates

    Sheet forms on sharing 3 O ions (Si2O5)2-

    Second sheet neutralizes sheet

    Kaolinite clayAl2(Si2O5) (OH)4

    Talc

    Mg3(Si2O5) 2(OH)2

    Mica

    KAl3Si3O10(OH)2

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    24/38

    Carbon

    Diamond

    Graphite

    Fullerenes

    CNT

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    25/38

    Homework

    Compare the densities of diamond,

    graphite, fullerene and carbon

    nanotubes. Make observations orcomments on the values.

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    26/38

    Piezo-ceramics

    Induced polarization upon

    application of stress

    Inverse effect: application of

    electric field generates stress

    Curie temperature

    Transformation from cubic to

    orthorhombic Orthorhombic structure is

    susceptible to polarization

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    27/38

    Piezo-ceramics

    Poling generates hysteresis

    and remanent polarization

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    28/38

    Piezo-ceramics

    Hard

    Can be exposed to repetitive high electrical

    and mechanical stresses Ideal for high-power and ignition applications

    Soft

    Relatively easy polarization

    Suitable for sensing applications, receivers,

    actuators and low power transducers

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    29/38

    More Complex Structures

    More than one

    compound

    YBCOsuperconductor

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    30/38

    Non-crystalline Structures

    GlassAmorphous structure

    Fused/vitreous silica Network formers

    B2O3 and GeO2

    Network modifiers Na2O, CaO

    Intermediates

    TiO2, Al2O3

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    31/38

    Determining Crystal Structure

    Indirect method

    Diffraction (probe beam must have

    wavelength < lattice spacing)Direct method

    STM

    AFMCan only see surface and immediate layers

    below it

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    32/38

    Determining Composition

    Spectroscopy

    UV-VIS

    IR X-ray

    Mass spectroscopy

    Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

    Rutherford Backscattering

    Neutron Activation Analysis

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    33/38

    Crystal Defects

    Point: 0-D

    Line: 1-D

    Area: 2-D

    Volume: 3-D

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    34/38

    Point Defects

    Vacancies

    Missing host atom

    Self-interstitialsDisplaced (misplaced)

    host atom

    Impurities

    Foreign atoms Interstitial

    Substitutional

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    35/38

    Ionic Crystal Point Defects

    Charge neutrality maintained

    Frenkel Defect: vacancy-interstitial pair

    Schottky Defect: vacancy pair

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    36/38

    Impurities

    Intrinsic Starting material (from growth)

    Extrinsic From material processing

    From device fabrication

    Intentional

    To attain desired property Included during growth or processing

    Doping

    Charge neutrality is maintained

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    37/38

    Location of Impurities Interstitial

    Occupying interstitial sites (in between host atoms)

    Substitutional Occupying vacancy sites (replacing host atoms in the lattice)

  • 7/26/2019 MSE 131 Ceramics Lecture 1 2016 Student

    38/38

    Interstitial or Substitutional?

    Hume-Rothery rules Size difference not greater than 15%

    EN comparable

    Similar valence ( 1, 2)* same crystal structure

    for complete solubility

    can be ignored for dilute solutions

    Satisfy first three conditions, impurity atomwill occupy a substitutional site

    Otherwise, interstitial site Size must be comparable to interstitial site