ms. susan hoff, epa region vii date: september 23, 1994 · 2016. 8. 16. · ms. susan hoff page 4...
TRANSCRIPT
MONTGOMERY WATSON '•J -", ^>
.:r 9V
To:
From:
Ms. Susan Hoff, EPA Region VII
Jeffrey L. Cootf^ffifKeith E. Schilling^
Date: September 23, 1994
Reference: 1166.0264
Subject: Phase 4 Project Update MemorandumFormer Ralston Disposal Site, Cedar Rapids, Iowa
cc: Darrell Kula, Rockwell International CorporationRobert Drustrup, Iowa Department of Natural ResourcesTed Faile, CDM-Federal ProgramsJohn Niffenegger, Sverdrup
RECEIVEDStP 26 1994SPFD BRAMCHREGION VII
INTRODUCTION
This Phase 4 project update memorandum has been prepared to briefly summarize and highlightresults of the Phase 4 remedial investigation (RI) at the former Ralston disposal (Ralston) site inCedar Rapids, Iowa. The Phase 4 activities outlined in the May 4, 1994 Phase 4 Addendum tothe April 1992 Field Sampling Plan (FSP) (Phase 4 FSP Addendum) focused on determining thehorizontal and vertical extent of volatile organic compound (VOC) contamination in the Siluriangroundwater system southeast of the Ralston site. The Phase 4 RI activities are distinguishedfrom the removal actions currently being implemented at the Ralston site. Whereas the removalactions are addressing the source area and contamination present above the bedrock surface, theRI is aimed at delineating the nature and extent of bedrock groundwater contamination at the site.
The specific objectives associated with the Phase 4 FSP Addendum were to:
1. Determine the horizontal and vertical extent of VOC contamination in the Silurianaquifer southeast of the Ralston site.
2. Delineate the Silurian stratigraphy southeast of the Ralston site for purposes ofidentifying zones of preferential groundwater flow and contaminant migration.
3. Define the potentiometric surface of the Silurian aquifer southeast of the Ralstonsite to determine the direction of groundwater flow downgradient of the site andpredict VOC migration pathways.
4. Establish a baseline for VOC concentrations in all site wells at the completion ofRI activities.
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 2 September 23, 1994
The objectives of the Phase 4 RI have been met and the results are reported in this memorandum.It should be noted that some analytical results have not been validated and any conclusionsregarding this data should be considered preliminary pending receipt of validated data.
SUMMARY OF PHASE 4 REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION
In order to accomplish the objectives listed above, two additional monitoring wells (MW-9B,MW-9D) were installed southeast of the Ralston site. The locations of the newly installed wellsand all existing site wells are presented in Figure 1. A summary of the investigation activitiescompleted during the Phase 4 RI are summarized below:
• Monitoring well MW-9D was installed approximately 500 feet southeast of theRalston site (Figure 1). The purpose of this well was to delineate the verticalextent of VOC contamination in the Silurian aquifer downgradient of the site. Inthe Phase 4 Addendum, the well was intended to be an "E" well; however, basedon the results of coring and packer sampling at MW-9, the well was installed at adepth of 250 feet and designated as MW-9D. Coring and packer samplingactivities were conducted at MW-9 to a depth of 340 feet. This depth penetratedthe dense and cherty dolomite as required in the Phase 4 Addendum. Packersamples were collected from the MW-9 borehole at depths of 115 feet(corresponding to the typical "B" elevation), 180 feet (typical "C" elevation),250 feet (typical "D" elevation), 280 feet, 317 feet and 340 feet. A combination1-inch and 2-inch well was installed through the core rods with the well screen forMW-9D set at 243-253 feet and sand pack placed from 240-256 feet. The bottomof the borehole was sealed with a combination of bentonite grout, bentonite chipsand pea gravel. A monitoring well construction diagram for MW-9D is presentedin Figure 2.
• Monitoring well MW-9B was installed next to MW-9D at a depth of 113 feet(well screen set at 103-113 feet) to correspond to the other "B" wells at the site.The borehole was drilled to a depth of 119 feet using water rotary drillingmethods. Sand pack was placed around the 2-inch diameter well from a depth of98-113 feet with the lowermost portion of the borehole filled in rock chips fromdrilling activities. A monitoring well construction diagram for MW-9B ispresented in Figure 3.
• Dye was used during coring through the designated packer sampling intervals atMW-9 to evaluate the degree of purging necessary to remove the water lost to theformation during drilling. The results indicated that removal of the volume ofwater lost during drilling enabled collection of a groundwater sample representingapproximately 90 percent formation water and 10 percent drilling water. Thissampling ratio was suitable for the packer sampling activities.
• Dedicated QED bladder pumps were installed in all of the bedrock monitoringwells at the Ralston site following Phase 4 well installation activities. All of the
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 3 September 23, 1994
bedrock monitoring wells were subsequently sampled for VOCs during the weekof August 8-12, 1994. A Hydrolab multiprobe water analyzer was utilized tomonitor the water quality in-line from the sample pumps in order to micro-purgethe wells at low sampling rates.
• All of the alluvial and bedrock monitoring wells at the site and piezometerMW-6C were resurveyed by Brain Engineering, Inc. to account for new well capsplaced on the bedrock wells and provide a baseline elevation for all of the wellsmeasured to a common datum. Depth-to-water measurements were conducted atthe site on September 6, 1994.
SUMMARY OF PHASE 4 RESULTS
Geology
The general geology of Devonian and Silurian bedrock formations present at the site is discussedin detail in the Removal Site Evaluation Report and previous project update memorandums. Arock core log for MW-9 is presented in Attachment A and a graphic lithologic log is presented inFigure 4. This update summary will focus on the subsurface lithology delineated by MW-9 andprovide a summary of the current state of understanding of the bedrock geology in the sitevicinity. Cross sections of the Ralston site area as shown on Figure 5 are presented in Figures 6and?.
• A bedrock core was collected from MW-9 from a depth of 98-340 feet. Thestratigraphy encountered at MW-9 was generally similar to other site locations.Underlying a thick mantle of clayey glacial drift (loess and till), the bedrocksurface was encountered at a depth of 73 feet, placing the bedrock surface atnearly the same elevation as the disposal area of the site (Figure 6). TheDevonian Otis and Bertram Formations were observed to a depth ofapproximately 163 feet (elevation of 683 feet). One large void and severalsmaller voids were encountered in the Coggon Member of the Otis Formationbetween 105-115 feet below ground surface. Underlying the Bertram Formation,the undifferentiated Silurian Scotch Grove Formation was observed to a depth of325 feet. At this depth, the cherty dolomite of the Buck Creek Quarry Member ofthe Scotch Grove Formation was observed to the bottom of the borehole at340 feet (Figure 4). Several large voids were encountered during drilling throughthe Scotch Grove Formation at depths of 191-193 feet, 195-199 feet, 290-296 feetand 300-307 feet. Voids of this magnitude have not been encountered at otherdrilling sites in the area.
• The cross sections (Figures 6 and 7) indicate that the Devonian and Silurianformations at the site are relatively flat-lying and continuous throughout the area.The vugular porosity noted in the Coggon Member of the Otis Formation iscontinuous from MW-4 to the former Bauer well (MW-5D). At MW-9 this zone
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 4 September 23, 1994
exhibits a high degree of porosity, including a 3-foot void at the base of the unit(110-113 feet).
• The upper Scotch Grove Formation observed from the base of the Devonian to anelevation of about 610 feet is the most variable portion of the Silurian bedrock atthe site, varying from dense mudstone to highly fossiliferous and coarsecrystalline. Underlying this variable fades, at an elevation of approximately610 feet, the dolomite becomes more dense with highly developed and solutionenhanced interconnected vugular porosity. This vugular zone is remarkablyconsistent throughout the site vicinity and exhibits a thickness of about 60-70 feet.The "D" wells at the site are generally installed in this unit. Below this unit, theScotch Grove Formation becomes more fossiliferous and generally exhibits thevariable qualities of the uppermost layer. The Buck Creek Quarry Memberunderlies the undifferentiated dolomite and consists of dense and chertymudstone. The member appears to slope downward to the north, exhibiting a topelevation of 525 feet at MW-9 and 490 feet at MW-3E.
• A dense, blue-gray mudstone layer was encountered at MW-1 and MW-3. Theunit comprises a highly reduced portion of the Silurian aquifer, evidenced by theunit's reduced color, secondary pyrite formation and hydrogen sulfide odoremanating from MW-3C which is screened in this unit. The reason for this isunknown. This reduced mudstone layer has only been observed at MW-1 andMW-3 at elevations of 670 feet and 677 feet, respectively. The clayey silt andfossiliferous dolomite observed between the two large voids at 293 feet and305 feet also exhibit these reduced-type qualities.
Hydrogeology
The hydrogeology of the bedrock groundwater system was investigated during the Phase 4 RI.Groundwater elevations measured in all of the bedrock wells at the site on September 6, 1994 arereported in Table 1 and summarized below.
• The horizontal direction of groundwater flow in the Silurian Scotch GroveFormation is generally to the south at the Ralston site disposal area (Figure 8).The horizontal gradient in this area continues to be very low, which suggestspredominantly lateral flow in the aquifer. The groundwater elevation measured atMW-8D was lower than previous determinations and appears to indicate asouthwesterly component of groundwater flow south of the site. This direction isinconsistent with previous measurements. MW-6C continues to exhibit thehighest groundwater elevations in the site area.
• The estimated direction of groundwater flow in the Devonian System is presentedin Figure 9. The water level data from MW-1B suggests that a groundwater highexists in the vicinity of this well which results in lateral groundwater flow fromthe disposal area in both northeast and southeast directions (Figure 9). The
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 5 September 23, 1994
detection of contamination in Devonian wells located north (MW-2B, MW-3B)and southeast (MW-9B) of the site support this interpretation.
• The vertical groundwater flow system along cross-section trace A-A' (Figure 5) isconceptually illustrated in Figure 10. This cross section trace generally parallelsthe direction of bedrock groundwater flow north and south of the site.Groundwater flow from the source area is directed both laterally to the north inthe alluvium and downward into the Devonian and Silurian bedrock. The effectof the groundwater high present in MW-1B is illustrated in Figure 10, sincegroundwater is apparently directed toward both the MW-3 and MW-9 wells. Thedensely spaced potential lines between MW-1B and MW-1C suggest that theBertram Formation in this area restricts vertical groundwater flow directly beneaththe site. Elsewhere (e.g., MW-9), the Bertram Formation appears to provide littlebarrier to vertical groundwater flow between the Coggon Member and Silurianaquifer (Figure 10).
• Very little vertical gradient exists in the Scotch Grove Formation from the "C" to"D" wells (Figure 10). A slight upward gradient exists from the upper HopkintonFormation (MW-3E) to the Scotch Grove Formation (MW-3D).
• Groundwater elevations measured in alluvial monitoring wells and existingtemporary piezometers on September 6, 1994 are presented in Figure 11. Thedirection of groundwater flow in the alluvial aquifer is generally similar toprevious determinations. Flow from the source area is oriented in both northeastand northwest directions, with groundwater flow on the north side of Dry RunCreek directed toward the east-northeast (Figure 11).
Extent of Groundwater Contamination
Groundwater samples were collected from all of the bedrock monitoring wells at the site duringthe Phase 4 RI. In addition, packer samples were collected from MW-9 during drilling andcoring activities at this location. Packer sampling results are presented in Tables 2 and 3 andnonvalidated monitoring well analytical results and packer sample results are presented inTable 4. Analytical reports for the monitoring well samples collected during the Phase 4 RI areincluded in Attachment B.
• Six packer samples were collected at MW-9 during drilling activities to determinethe vertical extent of contamination southeast of the Ralston site. Packer sampleswere collected at depths of 115 feet, 180 feet, 250 feet, 280 feet, 317 feet and340 feet and analyzed by National Environmental Testing, Inc. (NET) in CedarFalls, Iowa for overnight laboratory analysis of target VOCs. Duplicate samplesfrom 250 feet and 350 feet were shipped to NET in Cambridge, Massachusetts forContract Laboratory Program (CLP) VOC analysis. The target VOC analyticalresults and validated CLP duplicate analytical results are presented in Tables 2and 3.
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 6 September 23, 1994
• Cis-l,2-dichloroethene (DCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) were detected in bothDevonian and Silurian groundwater packer samples (Table 2). DCE was found ata higher concentration in the Devonian sample corresponding to the "B" depth(115 feet) than the "C" and "D" samples (180 feet and 250 feet, respectively). Theconcentration of TCE was generally consistent from the "B" to "D" depths andranged from about 3 |ig/L to 6 |ig/L. Groundwater samples collected at 317 feetand 340 feet indicated little VOC contamination present, with DCE detected at2.8 (ig/L at 317 feet and estimated at a concentration of 0.5 |0.g/L at a depth of340 feet (Table 3). TCE was not detected at 317 feet and 340 feet. Vinyl chloridewas not detected in any packer samples. The analytical results from the packersamples suggest that the vertical limits of VOC contamination in the Silurianaquifer have been defined downgradient of the site.
• Nonvalidated CLP analytical results for monitoring well samples are summarizedin Table 4. At the MW-9 wells, the CLP results from monitoring well sampling atMW-9D are generally consistent with the packer results from the same depth.TCE and DCE were detected at MW-9D at 5 u,g/L and 12 u,g/L, respectively. Thelevel of TCE is equal to the maximum contaminant level (MCL) for thiscompound (5 |J.g/L) whereas DCE is significantly below (70 Jig/L).
• At MW-9B, the well sampling yielded higher concentrations of VOCs than thepacker results. TCE, DCE and vinyl chloride were detected in MW-9B at 5 (J.g/L,370 (ig/L and 4 fig/L, respectively. The concentrations of DCE and vinyl chlorideare above MCLs set for the compounds. The discrepancy between packersampling and well sampling is likely due to dilution of the packer sample duringdrilling. Although most of the volume of water lost during drilling the packerinterval of 105-115 feet was measured and removed during the dye study, thevolume of water lost above this interval was not evaluated. The results fromMW-9B indicate VOC migration southeast of the Ralston site in the DevonianCoggon Member. The detection of VOCs in Devonian groundwater south of thesite suggests that previous detections of VOCs at the Bauer well may have beenthe result of Devonian contamination and, possibly not Silurian, as previouslysuspected. Although the former Bauer well was cased through the large voids ofthe Coggon Member, packer samples collected above and below this zoneindicated VOC concentrations in the Devonian strata.
• Although most of the VOC levels detected in monitoring well samples at the siteappear to decline, a significant increase in VOC concentrations was observed inMW-3C (Table 2). The VOC concentration in this well appeared to increasenearly 1.5 orders of magnitude since July 1993 (800-1000 p.g/L with the Rockwellgas chromatograph). The reason for this large increase is unknown. Evidently,the dense mudstone of MW-3C has provided a barrier for vertical contaminantmigration since the level of VOCs in MW-3D has declined during this same time.
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 7 September 23, 1994
• In general, VOC concentrations in bedrock wells appear to have declined sinceprevious measurements although there continues to be variability betweensampling events. Table 5 presents the results of some target analytes detectedduring previous sampling events at the site. The concentration of VOCs atMW-3B and MW-3D have declined most significantly at the site (Table 5).
• The estimated extent of VOC contamination in the Devonian groundwater systemis presented in Figure 12. This delineation considers packer samples collected atthe former Bauer well and MW-7D to define the lateral limits of the plume. Theorientation of the plume is consistent with the southeastern direction ofgroundwater flow in the Devonian bedrock (Figure 9). Although the absolutelimits are not defined, the lack of VOC detections in the Finley well provide somemeasure of the extent of contamination.
• The estimated extent of VOC contamination in the Silurian Scotch GroveFormation is presented in Figure 13. The highest concentrations of VOCs in theSilurian aquifer are noted at MW-3C and the extent of this high level ofcontamination is estimated to be confined primarily to the limits of the site. Thelateral extent of VOC contamination appears to be defined to the east by MW-7Dand to the south by MW-5D. The low levels of VOCs detected in packer samplesand in MW-9D appear to signal the close proximity of the horizontal limits ofcontamination in the Silurian aquifer southeast of the Ralston site. Theconfiguration of the Silurian and Devonian plumes (Figures 12 and 13) appear tobe very similar, further indicating the highly related properties of the two aquifersystems.
• The estimated vertical distribution of VOCs in the bedrock groundwater systemdowngradient of the site (cross-section trace A-A1) is presented in Figure 14. Thefigure considers both packer and well sampling results, although it must be notedthat the well results provide more definitive information. VOC concentrationsappear to increase in the dense mudstone layer at MW-3C and above the denseand cherty Buck Creek Quarry Member at MW-3E (Figure 14). The verticaldistribution of VOCs appears to be consistent with the vertical flow systempresented in Figure 10. The higher levels of VOCs present in the MW-3 wellsmay be the result of increased vertical migration along fractures or solutionnetworks associated with the Dry Run Creek channel. Beyond the vicinity ofMW-3 and the creek channel, the concentrations of VOCs appear to decline bothvertically and horizontally at distance from the site.
CONCLUSIONS
• The Devonian and Silurian stratigraphy observed at MW-9 is similar to other welllocations at the site. The vuggy "D" zone and dense cherty dolomite appear torepresent correlatable units throughout the Ralston site area. Several large voidsencountered at MW-9 have not been previously noted at the site.
Ms. Susan Hoff Page 8 September 23, 1994
• The horizontal direction of groundwater flow in the Silurian aquifer at the Ralstonsite is generally to the south. A low groundwater elevation measured at MW-8Dsuggests a westward component of flow south of the site, although this remains tobe substantiated with repeated measurements.
• Groundwater flow in the Devonian bedrock at the Ralston site appears to bedirected both north toward MW-3 and south-southeast toward MW-9 around agroundwater high in the vicinity of MW-1B.
• The horizontal and vertical extent of VOC contamination in the Silurian aquifersoutheast of the Ralston site is defined by the packer and well sampling activitiesat MW-9. The extent of VOC contamination in the Silurian aquifer is bounded tothe east by MW-7D, south by MW-5D and southeast by MW-9D.
• VOC migration southeast of the site is occurring in the Devonian bedrock, mostlikely in the vuggy and cavernous Coggon Member. DCE and vinyl chloridewere detected in MW-9B above MCLs. The lateral limits of the Devonian plumeappear to be defined by packer samples at MW-5 and MW-7.
• Significantly higher concentrations of DCE and vinyl chloride were detected inMW-3C, compared with previous determinations. At other bedrock wells at theRalston site, the levels of VOCs in the wells were generally observed to decline.
/kes:vasAttachments
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF GROUNDVVATER ELEVATIONS IN BEDROCK WELLSFORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Well No.
MW-1B
MW-1C
MW-1D
MW-2B
MW-3B
MW-3C
MW-3D
MW-3E
MW-4B
MW-4C
MW-5D
MW-6C
MW-7D
MW-8D
MW-9B
MW-9D
Top-of-CasingElevation
(ft)
805.34
805.91
810.9
794.18
791.94
791.1
790.58
793.62
789.79
789.6
865.98
807.75
812.02
850.02
855.49
856.22
Depth to Water(ft)
18.78
23.09
28.12
10.04
8.56
8.28
7.75
10.5
5.5
6.62
83.24
24.31
29.23
68.63
72.64
73.5
GroundwaterElevation
(ft)
786.56
782.82
782.78
784.14
783.38
782.82
782.83
783.12
784.29
782.98
782.74
783.44
782.79
781.39
782.85
782.72
Notes: Depth to water measurements conducted on September 6, 1994
Top-of-casing elevations resurveyed by Brain Engineering, Inc. to account for newwell caps and placement of well extensions on MW-1 cluster.
TABLE 2
MW-9 PACKER SAMPLE RESULTS - TARGER VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS - JUNE 1994(Results in pg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Sample Identification
Analyte MW-9E-115 MW-9E-180 MW-9E-250 MW-9E-317 MW-9E-340
Benzene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
1,1-Dichloroethene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene 41.5 21.1 25.6 2.8 <1.0
Tetrachloroethene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Toluene <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0
Trichloroethene 2.9 3.5 3.7 <1.0 <1.0
Vinyl Chloride <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0 <2.0
Drill Water
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10.0
TABLE 3
MVV-9 PACKER SAMPLE RESULTS - CONTRACT LABORATORY PROGRAM CONFIRMATIONJUNE 1994
(Results in |ig/L)FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Analyte
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-DichIoroethene1 , 1 -Dichloroethanetrans-1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-9E-250
2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U0.5, J
2,U2,U242,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U5
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.3, J2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-9E-2303
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U0.3, J
2,U2,U182,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U6
2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U0.2,12.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-9E-340
2,U2,U2,U2,U0.4, J
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.5, J2,U2,U2.U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-9E-330b
2,U2, U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.6, J
2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U
a MW-9E-250 is a duplicate of MW-9E-230.b MW-9E-330 is a duplicate of MW-9E-340.
U Indicates analyte was not detected at given detection limit.
J Analyte reported below detection limit and is an estimated value.
TABLE 4
COMPARISON OF TARGET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM VARIOUS SAMPLING PERIODS(Results in |ig/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Well No.
MW-1B
MW-1C
MW-1D
MW-2B
MW-3B
MW-3C
SampleDate
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-9407-9202-9312-9308-94
Trichloroethene
250230
-60
6545
-74
-293531
----
2,2001,200
-580
-0.7, J-0.2, J
cis-1,2-Dichloroethene
8601,400
-380
43120-160
-61
13090
----
4,6004,800
-2,400
-8
-38,000
VinylChloride
7<100
-<20
<44.J
-<10
.2,J
<20.4
420620-
200
2,1001,600
-1,800
-3
-9,000
U-Dichloroethene
2<100
-3
22-2
-0.9, Jl.J0.8, J
.---
240200, J
-140
-6,J
-200, J
Tetrachloroethene
7<100
-2
0.6, J<10
-0.4, J
-<4
0.5, J0.2, J
.---
0.8, J<500
-<2
-<2
-<2
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
912, J
-3
0.51-1
-0.7, J21
----
14<500
-12
-<2
-5
Benzene
1<100
-<2
<4140
-16
-<40.3, J
<2
----
2562, J
-13
-<2
-<2
TABLE 4 (CONTINUED)
COMPARISON OF TARGET VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND ANALYTICAL RESULTS FROM VARIOUS SAMPLING PERIODS(Results in |ig/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Well No.
MW-3D
MW-4B
MW-4C
MW-5D
MW-7D
MW-8D
Sample cis-1,2-Date Trichloroethene Dichloroethene
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-94
07-9202-9312-9308-94
12-9308-94
12-9308-94
12-9308-94
5873
.<2
-<2
.0.6, J0.4, J0.4, J
<2<2
U4
<2<2
.500
3315
.0.3, J
-<2
.U1,JU
<2<2
l.J5
<20.6, J
Vinyl 1,1-Chloride Dichloroethene Tetrachloroethene
11027
-0.7, J
-<2
.<2<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
6,J0.4, J0.4,1
-<2
-<2
.<2<2<2
<2<2
<20.2, J
<2<2
<50<2<2
.<2
-<2
.<2<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
0.4, J0.6, J
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
.<50
0.4,10.4, J
-<2
-<2
-<2<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
Benzene
5,J<2<2
-<2
-<2
.<2<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
<2<2
J Analyte reported below detection limit and is an estimated value.
- Sample was not analyzed.
TABLE 5
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in (Jg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-1B
2,U2,U0.4, J
2,U0.4, B,J
2,U2,U0.8,1
2,U3
320, E2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
54, E2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-1BDL
20, U20, U20, U20, U10.B.J20, U20, U20, U20, U3,J
38020, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U60
20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U3,J
20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U
MW-1C
2,U2,U0.6, J90.5, B, J2,U2,U3
2,U1,J
140, E2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
62, E2,U2,U162,U2,U2,U2,U0.4, J
2,U0.7, J0.3, J2,U2,U0.6, J
MW-1CDL
10, U10, U10, U114,B,J
14, B10, U3,J
10, U2,J
16010, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U7410, U10, U18
10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in Hg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichlorornethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis-1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1,1,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-1D
2,U2,U0.4, J
2,U0.4, B, J3,B2.U0.8, J
2,U1,J
87, E2,U2,U2,U0.2, J
2,U2,U2,U2,U272,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.2, J
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-1DDL
10, U10, U10, U10, U3,B,J
10, U10, U10, U10, Ul.J
9010, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U3110, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U10, U
MW-2B
2,U2,U202,U0.4, B, J1,B,J2,U2.U2.U2.U0.2, J2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-3B
2.U2,U
1.300.E2,U2,U2,U2,U
130, E0.6, J
12160, E
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
160, E2,U2,U132,U2,U2,U2.U2,U0.3, J0.5, J
2,U0.6, J
2,U1,J
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in (Jg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1 , 1 -Dichloroethene1 , 1 -Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1-TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-3BDL
200, U200, U
1,800200, U63.B.J
300, B200, U140, J200, U200, U
2,400, B200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U580
200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U
MW-3C
2,U2, U
520, E2,U0.2, B, J
4,B2,U
200, E5
100, E2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.2, J
2,U2,U
140, E2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U3
2,U5
2,U22
MW-3CDL
2,000, U2,000, U9,0002,000, U
430, B, J1,900,B,J2,000, U
200, J2,000, U2,000, U
38,0002,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U
250, J2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U
340, J2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U2,000, U
MW-3D
2,U2, U7
2,U2,U2,U0.3, J0.4, J0.2, J0.4, J
15, B2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U3
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in Hg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-9B
20, U20, U4,J
20, U5,B,J
20, U4,J95
20, U3.J
330,820, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U11020, U20, U11020, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U10011020, U20, U20, U
MW-9D
2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U0.2, J
2,U2,U
12, B2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U5
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in (ig/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-DichIoroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans-1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-3E
2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,B2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-4B
2,U2,U2,U2,U0.3, B, J
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2, U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-4C
2,U2,U2,U2,U0.5, B, J
2,B2,U2,U2,U2,U1,J2,U2,U2,U2.U2.U2,U2,U2,U0.4, J
2,U2,U2, U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-5D
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U3,B2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATF.R SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in |Jg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1.1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis- 1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1.1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 . 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
MW-7D
2,U2,U2,U2,U1,B,J2,U2,U0.2, J
2,U2,U5
2,U2,U102,U2,U2,U2.U2.U4
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
MW-8D
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U3,B2, U2, U2, U2,U0.6, J
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2, U2,U2,U2, U2.U2.U2,U0.6, J
2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2.U
MW-9B
2,U2,U4
2, U2,U0.6, B,J0.4, J6
2,U2
380, E2.U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U5
2,U2,U2,U2, U2,U2.U2,U0.4, J
2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2, U
MW-9BDL
20, U20, U5,J
20, U5, B.J
19,B.J20, U5,J
20, U2,J
380, B20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U6,J
20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U20, U
TABLE 5 (CONTINUED)
GROUNDWATER SAMPLE RESULTS - AUGUST 1994(Results in Hg/L)
FORMER RALSTON DISPOSAL SITE, CEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
Compound
ChloromethaneBromomethaneVinyl ChlorideChloroethaneMethylene ChlorideAcetoneCarbon Disulfide1,1-Dichloroethene1,1-Dichloroethanetrans- 1 ,2-Dichloroethenecis-1 ,2-DichloroetheneChloroform1 ,2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone1,1,1 -TrichloroethaneCarbon TetrachlorideBromodichloromethane1 ,2-Dichloropropanecis- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneTrichloroetheneDibromochloromethane1 , 1 ,2-TrichloroethaneBenzenetrans- 1 ,3-DichloropropeneBromoform4-Methyl-2-Pentanone2-HexanoneTetrachloroethene1 , 1 ,2,2-TetrachloroethaneTolueneChlorobenzeneEthylbenzeneStyreneXylene (total)
M\V-9Ca
2,U2,U
1,500,E2,U2,U4,B2,U
120,E0.6, J
17150.E
2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U
380, E2,U2,U132,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U0.5,1
2,U0.6, J2,Ul.J
MW-9CDL3
200, U200, U
2,100200, U56, B, J
200, U200, U160, J200, U200, U
2,700, B200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U580
200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U200, U
Trip Blank
2,U2,U2,U2,U0.8, B,J2,U2.U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U
Field Blankl
2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U8,B2,U2.U2,U2,U2,U0.9, J2.U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2,U2, U2,U2,U2,U
a MW-9C is a duplicate of MW-3B.B Indicates analyte found in associated blank sample.E Indicates compound concentrations exceeded calibration range of GC/MS instrument.J Analyte reported below detection limit and is an estimated value.U Indicates analyte was not detected at given detection limit.
Pag« __1__ of ..._5_._
MONTGOMERY WATSON
LOCATION: Former Ralston Disposal Sits
CLIENT: Rockwell International
HOLE NO: MW-9E
JOB NO: 1166.0261
DATE: September ?-1C. 1593
DATUM: USGS NGVD Elevation
DRILLER. J & R Dnlling
DRILL RIG CME 750
INSPECTORS. K Schilling
ROCK COKE LOG
§COS
1LITHOLOGIC LOG
ELEVATION(FEET)
95
100-
105-10
110——
115-
120-
125-
130-10
135-
140-
145-
150-
10
Start log at 98 ft
Cedar Rapids Member, Dolomite, blue-gray brown (98-98.5), It gray brown (98.5-100.5), Itgray to yellow brown (100.5-105), 98-100.5 vf xL to lithographic,banded, pressure solution features,dense, hard, few fractures, little sec. porosity, (mudstone fades).
Coggon Member, 100.5-105, becoming coarser grained, small vesicular porosity to 102.5, caldteveinlets (1-2 mm), med. xL to coarse - appears to coarsen downward, approx. 102.5 lost allcirculation, v. fractured, pieces 0.5-2.0" long, highly weathered, solution enhanced, more fractureporosity than scattered fossil moldic, interior of sol. voids v. coarse "sucrosie"dense, bard.
Very poor recovery, many voids encountered during drilling. One large void 110-113 feet, totalrecovery = 2.5 fL/10.0 ft Dolomite, It yellow brown to It brown, fine xL, "sandy" texture - v. smallgrains,laminated - many places, v. broken - most pieces 0.1 ft, laminations alternately 1L brown, dk. brown<0.01 wide, minor vugular porosity in one small piece, otherwise little sec. porosity noted. Soft,petroliferous odor.
115-120, Dolomite, orange-yellow brown to buff, fine to med. xL, generally 0.1-0.4' broken pieces,highly fractured, some fossil moldic porosity, many molds, fract. filled with dolomite spar, few fract.filled with clay, highly laminated with dk. brown lines, petroliferous odor on powdered surfaces,soft
120-124, Bertram Fm., dolomite, bluish brown to mostly gray brown, vf xln to fine xl, highlyfractured zone 121-123 ft, little sec. porosity in form of fossil molds and Tract, most fract. fillcaldte spar or clay, - mostly day in upper 2', dense, harder than above.
, most fract. filled with
Dolomite, bluish gray, fine xL, hard, dense, caldte spar, few styolites, 126.5-127.0 shale, dk. brownto dk. bluish brown small fossil moldic porosity up to 0.3' below shale (<0.01* diameter), becomesmore dense 128-130 feet
Dolomite, bluish gray, very fine xL to lithographic mudstone fades, brecdcted, some styolites, v.hard, dense, more fossil moldic 137-140 - small (<0.01') fossil wolds appear to be brachiopods, somecrescent-shaped.
Dolomite, gray-blue gray to si. buff, vf xL to lithographic, brecciated 148.5-150; like above, appearsto contain darts or fills or gray lith. carb. muds in xf matrix, more abundant small fossil moldscontinue from above to 151.5 feet, then less numerous, more dense, caldte span filling some cracksbetween breccia
595
—— 590
585
580
—— 575
—— 570
565
560
555
550
545
540
/ ' , , 'H^,~«—— i..__————ii t \^ — " je, _________ I
* / • ' ! " . *— THURNE5S HOUSE \
LEGEND:
• MONITORING WELL
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
MONITORING WELL LOCATIONSMONTGOMERY WATSON
CONCRETE PAD13' x 3' x 3')—^
KEY:
BENTONITE CHIPS (COARSE)
PEA GRAVEL
COARSE SILICA SAND
BENTONITE GROUT
\h
\
1
?">
\» • »" ;' .'- • • • ! "5
' -v*
r-0.5' I
L,
< 5:
o
_, — -— - —— PROTECTIVE CASH
' •;.' . .' GROUND SURFACEs .' • . ' •
$± —————— 2" STAINLESS STE
X* ————— 47/a" BOREHOLE - 5
^ BEDROCK SURFACE
( - —————— 3%" BOREHOLE
*:
< ^ ——— /'TO 2" ADAPTER
• ——————— /"STAINLESS STEt
.* — VOIDS
I •" —————— J" BOREHOLE
^^-TQP OF SAND PAL
-_ ' ——————— TOP OF SCREEN'-• ——————— 10' S.S. SCREEN 0.
1iI ^ — LARGE VOIDSgL -"
TOTAL DEPTH • 340 FT.
NOT TO SCALE
MONTGOMERY WATSON
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
MW-9D MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM
FIGURE 2
LL PAD-T ( -r I ,
2.6'
73 F7.- BEDROCK SURFACE
2" STAINLESS STEEL0.10 SLOT-
VOIDS-
ROCK CUTTINGS FILL UPTO THIS LEVEL = 1/3.5 FT.
•PROTECTIVE CASING LOCKED
GROUND SURFACE
-BENTON/TE GROUT
•SURFACE CASING DIAMETER(AUGER FLIGHTS - O.D.) = 77/B"
-4%" BOREHOLE
-2" STAINLESS STEEL
TOP OF BENTON/TE SEAL = 91.5 FT.-BENTONITE CHIPS (COARSE)-TOP OF SAND PACK = 98 FT.-TOP OF SCREEN = 103 FT.
SCREEN DEPTH =113 FT.
PEA GRAVEL
TOTAL DEPTH = 723.5 FT.
NOT TO SCALE
MONTGOMERY WATSON
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IOWA
MW-9B MONITORING WELLCONSTRUCTION DIAGRAM
FIGURE 3
/I
100
1*0
160
8
185
ZfO
no
ltd
IK
ioo
Q
S*
S
I
TOO
6SO
900
550
$10
*
1
SlL
Uf*
**
|1
0
iSC
OTCH
GKO
VE F
QMuT
to*
3
if
;
*.
5
if
^"tfifr/<zi/ V * /II"!1, li i/
~'{L-jL-J-
/'- /. %/ '/" /-/ , * / ,
°^-/°~ •>/L~~ 1 J
w «-=-/-« — /• — /•/ -7 -7 ~7ypv<A<V />-I I I !// 0 /O 0/>-0 0
o/c-*- <Vo oybo
</* ° / °
^TTTn/OfoT^oOf/O
%0/JoOc/
°4°/f°ff?F
y<%y>°'?'*$<'sKM*</i./(YA / ''/••/ V/J * /. v/{ /°/e°v/°v °
/«v /« VA' A*/
/ /"of/o
'/•*/. •/o /v t/« o/o / o^-^1
* »» *• x •.••-r^"" o/° Vo7 °/ e» / '"7^
o/-*/°^
/ = AV /o
/«/»/»/
/ - / •A'/'/< * /
IAV-
1
~T 2.7 J.5 2/J
I ,5 ,5 «
*• LUHHHTU
| *
,y ClLCITf LlHCD rues- SHUCT•* SMCH/OPODI tfU(CniK£Sv VUGULt*
o cww/o nrawsI lurfKHU. SCUUCHT FILLS
~ STTOLITCS" 8KCCHTCD
__ > GLMCOHITIC\ on <ij> z.i c^_ VOID
fir SHU.C
Y/f \ aoLounc
~T~ 0.33 <IJ> <I.O
f ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL \CEDAR RAPIDS, IA
MW-9 LITHOLOGY AND(fl*) MONTGOMERY WATSON GROUNDWATER SAMPLING INFORMATION
FIGURE 4
•^Cffv*
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, 1A
CROSS SECTION TRACESA - A' & B - B'
FIGURE 5
GLACIAL DRIFT UNDIFFERENTIATED
A
I——1——I——I——i——i—iOTIS FORMAT/ONCEDAR RAPIDS MEMBER
COGGON MEMBER
BERTRAM FORMATION
SCOTCH GROVE FORMATIONUHDIFFERENTIATED BLUE - GRAY MUDSTONE
(REDUCED ZONE)
§-——WELL SCREEN (TYP.IV
V
PACKER SAMPLE INTERVAL ITYPJ
JOHNS CREEK QUARRY MEMBER
HOPKINTON FORMATIONPICTURE ROCK MEMBERBUCK CREEK QUARRY MEMBER A A A
A A AA
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
LEGEND.MIXED DENSE. FOSSILIFEROUS.COARSE CRYSTALLINE FABRICSDENSE. INTERCONNECTEDVUGULAR NETWORKSDENSE. CHERTYSHALE OR SHALEY DOLOMITE
GEOLOGIC CROSSSECTION A - A'
FARMERS CREEK MEMBER
MONTGOMERY WATSON
oC
S50 -
800 -
750 -
700 -
650 -
600 -
550 -
vN
A A (NO)
SCOTCH GROVE FORMATION UNOFFERENTIATED tl2>
V vV
V
\v ;
/- x
- ABUCK CREEK QUARRY MEMBER
MONTGOMERY WATSON
LEGEND:&3 HIKED DENSE. FOSSILIFEROUS.:°\ COARSE CRYSTALLINE FABRICSTvi 0£«S£. INTERCONNECTED
WGULAfl "CTWWSAl DENSE. CHERTY
^- SHALE OR SHALEY DOLOMITE
/"» 700'
TO7-AL VOC CONCENTRATION <WL)PACKER SAMPLE RESULT (l^/Ll
__ LIMITS OFVOC CONCENTRATIONS (WL>
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
GEOLOGIC CROSS SECTION B - B'FIGURE 7
'.r-'V 331
- J ^W i ' iV .-i..:-^.
i!1^ .' i———
: CONTOUR INTERVAL VARIES.
LEGEND:• MONITORING WELL
1781.391 GROUNWATER ELEVATION
ESTIMATED GROUNDMATER FLOW DIRECTION
782.0———— ——— EOUI POTENTIAL LINE
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER FLOWDIRECTION IN SILURIAN SCOTCH
GROVE FORMATIONMONTGOMERY WATSON
•"**-*T-'"^*V'*'. fc' rl>- ' ~ - • .jt'., ,*r", -7 '"^ ~! j. "V'W•* *•- : -'•:.• - - ^ •*"• - ••-—^"—• iii -;i"'"**i«ia*i-. *--*- ct_• i^Mar • ah MII •Ui'~i '•••'• .^.- • *^^r.^_ . f * _ v ---n i^Aiai ' ni'n i«w 41
WVV-6C
/ +
300
SCALE IN FEET
WATSON
NOTE: CONTOUR INTERVAL ' 1.0 FT.
LEGEND:
• MONITORING WELL1784.74) GffiUMCWATER ELEVATION
——— >• ESTIMATED GROUNCWATER FLOW DIRECTION
784.Q ———— ——— EOUIPOTENTIAL LINE
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATER FLOWDIRECTION IN DEVONIAN SYSTEM
FIGURE 9
\\
SCOTCH GSO'/f FORMATIONUH&FFERENTIATECi BLUE. - GftAY UiiOSTOHE
#ELL SCf>£EN ITfPJ(78Z.8SH
V
PICKER SAMPLE INTERVAL (TYP.I
JOHNS CREEK OUARfir UEVBER
HOPKINTQ.1PICTURE ROCK ME
ESTIMATED GROUNCWATERFLOW DIRECTION
FARMERS CHEEK W£ECU/POTENTIAL LINE
APPROXIMATE CROUNOHATERELEVATION 109-06-941
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
CONCEPTUAL VERTICALGROUNDWATERFLOW SYSTEM ,.
FIGURE TO__________ V/
/•*"
i\\5 SG-22\\.<'^,.(DRY-785.67)-• •- *• -£v
786.0— EQUIPOTENTIAL LINE TOP-OF-CASINGS REFERENCED !
200
SCALE IN FEET
MONTGOMERY WATSON
APPROXIMATE DIRECTION OF TO PREVIOUS SURVEY.GROUNCWATER FLOW
GROUNCWATER ELEVATIONMEASURED 09/06/94
TEMPORARY MONITORING POINT
MONITORING WELL ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
APPROXIMATE GROUNDWATERFLOW DIRECTION IN
ALLUVIAL SYSTEM_________________FIGURE 11____________ ./
/vores: /. ror i. we CONCENTRATIONS ROUNDEDTO 2 SIGNIFICANT DIGITS.
LEGEND:
• MONITORING WELL
(-10) PACKER SAMPLE RESULTS
2. CONTOUR INTEff/AL LOGRITHMIC
3. SAMPLE RESULTS IN
MONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS
ISOCONCENTRATION LINE(DASHED WHERE APPROXIMATE!
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
MONTGOMERY WATSON
ESTIMATED EXTENT OF VOCCONCENTRATIONS IN DEVONIAN SYSTEM
FIGURE 12
MONTGOMERY WATSON
NOTES: I. CONTOUR INTERVAL LOGRITHUIC
LEGEND: 2. SAMPLE RESULTS IN i>g/L
• MONITORING WELL
1771 MONITORING WELL SAMPLE RESULTS
._. ISOCONCENTRAT/ON LINEI (J————-—" (DASHED WHERE APPROXIMATE!
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS, IA
ESTIMATED EXTENT OF VOCCONCENTRATIONS IN SILURIAN
SCOTCH GROVE FORMATIONFIGURE 13
LfGE/VO:ESTIMATED GROUNONATERFLOW DIRECTION
ROCKWELL INTERNATIONALCEDAR RAPIDS. IA
ECU/POTENTIAL LINE
\I69 1 TOTAL VOC CONCENTRATION (i^g/L!
128) PACKER SAUPLE RESULT
ESTIMATED VERTICALDISTRIBUTION OF VOCs
FIGURE 14
ATTACHMENT A
-MONTGOMERY WATSON •
Pag*
MONTGOMERY WATSON
LOCATION: Former Ralslon Disposal Site
CLIENT: Rockwell International
HOLE NO: MW-9D
JOB NO: 11660261
DATE: September 2-10, 1993
DATUM: USGS NGVD Elevation
DRILLER J& R Drilling
DRILL RIG: CME 750
INSPECTORS: K. Schilling
ROCK CORE LOG
;LU LITHOLOGIC LOG ELEVATION(FEET)
250-17
255-
260-
265-
270-
18
19
20
275-21 7.5
280-
285-
22 7.5
290-23 10
295-
300-
305-
6/10' recovery. Dolomite, med., dk. yellow brown, crystalline • fide to med., dense, hard, highlysolution weathered in fossil molds - sparsely fossilferous - many voids interconnected, solutionenlarged. Several vertical splits of cores, fractured - most pieces 0.1-0.5" long. Few voids containsmaller, rounded dolomite rocks - falls apart when core extruded. Crumbles into smaller pieces@251' and 255-257 ft.
Dolomite - as above - highly fractured, less solution enhanced, fossil moldic.
Dolomite, 3 ft. rec., v. broken, yellow brown to brown, dense, fine to med. xL., some dolomitespar, filling fractures, sparsely fossil moldic, numerous fractures - most solutionally weathered.Difficult to core - keeps breaking and crumbling into core barrel - binds up and makes Itdifficult to get good penetration.
Dolomite - 5 ft. recovery. Same as above. Many void surfaces, rounded. Few bned with coarsedolomite crystals. Voids interconnected through cores. Few styolites, approx. 271' - brownconnected to solution void possibly Indicating sec. iron oxide precipitation.
Dolomite, mottled yellow brown, orange brown, brown - fine xL, dense, hard, v. broken,fractured, sparsely fossil moldic - most molds enlarged greatly by solution of rock, clear dolomitespar/crystals lining few voids, several fractures filled with dolomite spar. 5/7.5 ' recovery.
Dolomite - 4.5 foot recovery, med. xL, mottled with orange brown, mostly It. brown to yellowbrown, v. broken, solutionally weathered, void contains dolomite crystals (approx. 284') l-2mmdiameter, crinoid debris present in one void approx. 288'.
Large void 291-297.Clay (296-298), v. dk. gray, v. soft, no HO reaction, mostly silt, .15' little day, few to trace sand.Upper 0.4 feet, dolomite rock. 298-300 Dolomite, vdk. gray to black, v. porous, soft, smallvesicular type porosity, intact peice 1.5 ft. in length. Pj rite disseminated throughout lower 2 ft.
Seven foot void 300-30T - No rock.
595
590
585
580
575
—— 570
—— 565
—— 560
—— 555
—— 550
545
—— 540
Psge __5_ o( __5
MOMTCOMEKV WATSON
LOCATION Former Ralston Disposal Site
CLIENT: Rockwell International
HOLE NO. MW-9D
JOB NO: 11660261
DATE: Sep:emL-er 2-10. 1693
DATUM: USGS NGVD Elevation
DRILLER: J & R Drilling
DRILL RIG CME 750
INSPECTORS: K. Schilling
ROCK CORE LOG
LU
s03
LITHOLOGIC LOG ELEVATION(FEET)
300-24 10
305-
310-25
315-
320-26
325-27 10
330-
335-28
340-
345-
350-
355-
300-305 - Void.305-307.5 - Clay, v. dk. gray, soft, mostly silt, some fine to med. sand, trace gravel - angular tosub-rounded, dolomite fragments, Pj rite disseminated - large pyrite crystals (0.05') at 307 feet.Sharp contact with underlying dolomite.307.5-310 - Dolomite, yellow brown, v. porous, small to few large vugular to vesicular porosity,"sandy" dolomite crystals throughout, grainy texture, soft, - Dense and hard where not highlydolomitized.
Note: 1.5 feet of sand and clay fell into bottom of corehole - this material present at top 1.5 feet ofcore run. Likely represents cuttings.310-319 - Dolomite, yellow brown, v. porous, mostly small vesicular molds, few large (0.5") vugs.Large part exhibits "sandy" or dolomite crystals. Several fractures, vugs, filled with dolomite spar.Few fossils observable (mostly crinoids) due to dolomitioation, bracb, plecypod fossil molds.
319-320 - Dolomite, yellow brown.320-323 - More gray to gray brown.323-325 - Lt. gray 319-323Dolomite, "sandy" texture, fine to med. dol. xLs, moderately fossilferous (abundant crinoids,brachiopods, plecypod shells) Fossil moldic porosity - most small (<0.01'), few larger molds (0.05to 0.10'). Dolomite, It. gray to dk. gray, more dense, fine to vf. xLn, hard, less fossilferous thoughstill some fossil molds present - much denser than above. 324.8 - Dolomite, It. gray, dense, sparselyfoss., soft, v. little vugular/vesicular porosity.325 - Dolomite, It gray to It gray brown. Dense to hard, soft, xf xLn.328 - White chert encountered, chalky, white, most soft, few modules, much harder. Many chertzones exhibit vugular porosity with some vugs, lined with dolomite xLs, many vugs, solutionaflyweathered. Cores tend to break along chert/dolomite contact Small, few vugs, vesicular indolomite. Minor fossil molds, sparsely fossilferous.
Same as above. Chert zone at 339.5 feet, v. fractured.
595
__ 590
585
—— 580
575
570
565
—— 560
—— 555
550
—— 545
540
Peg*
//- ———————————————————————————————————— ^ffffl MCWTGOHHEKr WATSON DATE: September 2-10, 1993
DATUM: USGS NGVD Elevation Ttr\fV rr\rt\? T f\f~<LOCATION Former Ralslon Disposal Site KOCK. C(JKr> LUCj
DRILLER: J & R DrillingCLIENT: Rockwell International
HOLE NO. MW-9D DR.LL R,G: CME 750
JOB NO: ,,660261 INSPECTORS: K. SchiHing ^
f
150 ——
155 ——
160 ——
165 ——
170 ——
175 ——
i Rfi
185 ——
1OA
195 ——
205 ——V
RUN
NUM
BER
7
8
9
10
11
1
10
10
10
10
10
1 LITHOLOGIC LOG
Bertram Km. - continuedDolomite, gray to blue gray 150-156.5, intermixed green shale and gray dolomite 156.5to 160 feet. 160-166.5 - same as above, brecciated, styolites, mud clasts (It. gray) v. dense, bard.166.5-170 green shale filling cracks to 169 ft., then mostly green shale 169-170. SI. sandy 166.5-167.5 flFinely laminated with dk. brown laminations (wavy). Dolomite dominates to 169 with shale infilling,then mostly shale. Little sec. porosity noted, v. dense, few natural breaks in core.
160-161.5 - Bertram Fm.- same as above, dolomite, It blue gray - large 0.02' fracture orientedvertically from mostly sbale above into more competent bedrock below.
161.5 - Silurian - Scotch Grove Formation - undifferentiated.Dolomite, buff with some orange brown and little yellow brown, med. xL, dense, hard, few fossils- most fossil molds enhanced by solution of rock (brachiopod molds), fractured (pieces rangefrom 0.2 to 0.5 feet long), some coarse xL, calcite spar in some voids, other voids solutionallyweathered and enlarged, little iron oxide staining along inside surfaces of voids and fractures.
Dolomite, fine & v. fine xL, dense, sparsely fossil, few fossil molds, few fractures, (core in large,unbroken pieces). Minor fossil moldic porosity, large (0.15', 0.3') solution enhanced voids at 178.5and 179.5 ft.
Dolomite, It gray, little yellow, orange brown staining along fracture surfaces; yellow brown clayfilling fractures at 184, 186 feet. Calcite span at 185 feet (0. 05' thick layer) - becoming morefossiliferous (crinoids, bracbs, etc.) - fossils and molds at 182 feet-183 feet Otherwise, sporadicfossils and molds present in dense, hard, fine xL matrix, more molds than above, also morefractures evident.
2 ft. recovery, approx. 4 ft void 195-199 feet, 2 ft void at 193-194.5 ft, numerous other smallvoids. Significant Fe oxide coatings on fract surfaces - also calcite spar, large interconnectedfossil moldic porosity. Dolomite med. to coarse grained, appears as ghost fabric, fossils evident -all coallesced into rock mass, some crlnoid stems evident, void surfaces v. weathered, eroded.
ELEVATION(FEET)
595
—— 590
coc
—— 580
——
—— 570
fff
—— 560
— 555
—— 550
-r~r\jJ
Pag« _. 3__ ol _J___
fi —————————————————————————————————————— ^(ffy MONTGOMERY WATSON DATE: Septenbe, 2-10. 1983
" " DATUM USGS NGVD Elevalion nf\/-^vs- /~**j-\Tir> T f\t~*LOCATION Fotmei Halslon Disposal Site ROCK CORE LOGDRILLER: J & R Drilling
CLIENT: Rockwell InternationalDRILL RIG CME 750
HOLE NO: MW-9DINSPECTORS: K. Schilling
JOB NO: 11660261
^
I&O z*~
L\fJ
~._ __
295 ——
210 ——
215 ——
220 ——
225 ——
—
—
—235 ——
240 ——
—
245 ——
•"in
255 ——V
ffifflS
2
1
12
13
14
15
16
*z.a
10
10
10
9
11
1Us
LITHOLOGIC LOG
Silurian Scotch Grove fra. • continued.Dolomite, It gray and It yellow; voids, fractures stained Fe oxides, fine to med. xL, dense, hard,
mostly small <0.01' fossil molds present, more fossiliferous zones, bands generally 0.2' thick - fossilsabundant in these zones - texture more "sandy", softer, often breaks in these zones. Few voidsfilled with calcite cement, spar. Most fossils appear to be crinoid debris.
Dolomite, It yellow brown, med. xL - where dense, less fossilferous, more fossil zones v. porous,("sandy" grains ) abundant crinoid debris. Varies from dense to v. porous over less than 6".213-213.8 shale, dk. gray (upper 0.6') to olive brown (0.2'). Minor shale 218.6 and 219.7 - dk. gray.Minor calcite spar, cement in voids and fractures. Fossil molds become larger, lower 4 feet, moresolution enhanced - only 7.5 feet recovery - small voids encountered between 215-220 feet
220-223 - Shale from before, shaky interval likely between 219.7-223. Olive brown, soft,malleable. Dk. gray to blue gray dolomite intermixed 220-221, then back to predom. shale, denser222-223 - more laminated olive brown, dk. gray layers, hard, more competent breaks.223-224 - very "sandy" - large dolomite rhombs, almost sandstone appearance224-228 - color more blue gray brown with orange brown in voids, dense, some fossil molds -many oriented at approx. 45 degree dip from core. Med. to coarse xL., hard.228-230 - Yellow brown - orange brown in voids, more fossilferous, crumbly, weakly cemented,abundant crinoid debris.
230-231 - Yellow brown, fossiliferous - plecypods, crinoids, brachiopods, grades into 233 feet.233 - Yellow and orange brown, dense, hard, few fossil molds - most greatly enlarged by solutionof rock, calcite cement more abundant236 - Becomes more Interconnected, fossil moldic, vugular, solution features, weathering on voidsurfaces typical "D" zone material.
Dolomite, yellow brown to dk. yellow brown to brown, fine to med. xL., v. dense, sporadic fossilmoldic - mostly enlarged by solution of rock. Clear dolomite crystals, few large (0.01') rhombs,highly fractured - pieces generally 0.1-0.6 feet Several 1-4" voids encountered during drilling -7/10 feet recovery. Many voids exhibit solution features - smooth, curved surfaces -interconnected voids, etc.
^
ELEVATION(FEET)
595
__
—— 590
—— 580
—— 575
— 570
—— 565
——— 560
—— 555
—
—— 550
.7T.J
—— 540J
ATTACHMENT B
-MONTGOMERY WATSON •
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Report To: Mr. Keith SchillingMontgomery Watson Americas11107 Aurora AvenueDesMoines, IA 50322
Project: Low Level Volatiles
FD Case 1203
Section One
08/31/1994
NET Job Number: 94.02521
National Environmental Testing
NET Atlantic, Inc.Cambridge Division
12 Oak ParkBedford, MA 01730
Massachusetts Certification NumberN HA023
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page NumberSection 1. Report Front
1A. Table of Contents.............. /MO/IB. Narrative/Cover Letter.........
1C. Main Page/Sample CrossReference....
ID. Chain of Custody Forms.........
IE. Data Qualifier/Flag Descriptions
IF. Document Inventories............ 1C OH
Section 2. Metals Analysis Data.................. NOT REQUESTED
Section 3 . Volatiles Analysis Data...............
TOOOT
NATIONALENVIRONMENTALTESTING, INC.
Cambridge D'vision12 Oak ParkBedford, MA 01730Tel: (617)275-3535Fax: (617) 275-7411
August 31, 1994
Mr. Keith SchillingMontgomery Watson Americas11107 Aurora AvenueDesMoines, IA 50322
RE: Low Level Volatiles Rockwell Project (FD 1203), NET Job Number94.02521
Dear Mr. Schilling:
Enclosed please find the results of the chemical analysesperformed by NET Cambridge Division for the Low Level VolatilesRockwell Project (FD 1203), NET Job Number 94.02521.
This narrative addresses all comments for all samples as listedbelow:
NET JOB HUMBER: 94.02521
SAMPLEID
HU-9B +MS/KSDHU-90MU-5DMW-80HU-3BHU-9CHW-3CMU-30HW-3EHU-4BHU-4CHU-2BMU-1BMU-1CHU-1DMW-7DFIELD BLANK 1Trip Blank
NETID
108171108172108173108174108175108176108177108178108179108180108181108182108183108184108185108186108187108188
DATETAKEN
08/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/1994
TIMETAKEN
07:4511:1512:1513:1014:5010:0015:3015:1016:1016:5017:0018:0008:0008:2009:0009:4008:15
DATEREC'D
08/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/1994
MATRIX
GROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERGROUND UATERBLANK
NATIONALENVIRONMENTALTESTING, INC.
Cambridge Divricn12 Oak ParkBedford. MA 01730Tel: (617)275-3535Fax: (617)275-7411
All laboratory comments for the data packages have beensummarized in the following tables:
Sample Receipt and LoginMetals and Cyanide AnalysesVolatile Organics Analyses
TABLE 1Analyses Not Required
TABLE 3
These narrative tables are also enclosed with each data packagesection.Please find enclosed a diskette of the results for this case.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. Pleasedo not hesitate to call or write if you have any questions orrequire further information.
Sincerely!j \
Alison P. DarrowProject Manager
enclosures
TABLE 1SAMPLE RECEIPT & LOGIN
FD1203
GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments were necessary.
10004
TABLESVOLATILES ORGANICS NARRATIVE SUMMARY
FD1203
GENERAL COMMENTS: The samples were analyzed using a modifiedmethod OLM01.9 with a 25 ml purge for lower detection limits.
The Client requested the laboratory to verify results for sampleMW3C (NET ID 108177) as preliminary results did not matchprevious sample history. Several dilutions had been analyzed andresults were consistent. The sample vials were checked forsample ID and everything appears to be correct.MANUAL INTEGRATIONS: Manual integrations are performed onstandards and samples when the integration is not complete due topeak shape and chromatography. This is confirmed by visualinspection by the analysts. The "M" flag indicates that a manualintegration has been performed.
#17- Total 1,2-Dichloroethene must be integrated in the initialand continuing calibration standards to include the total area ofthe cis- and trans- isomers.SURROGATES: All system monitoring compound I recoveries werewithin the contract required QC limits.MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE(s): All spike recoverieswere within QC limits for the MS/MSD analysis. All RPDs werewithin the required limits.BLANKS: A method blank was analyzed for each twelve hour timeperiod on each GC/MS system used for analysis. No blankcontained greater than five times the CRQL of Methylene Chloride,Acetone, and 2-Butanone, or greater than or equal to the CRQL ofany other volatile target compound.TUNE: All instrument performance check criteria were met priorto the start of sample analysis.
CALIBRATION: All compounds met the required minimum RF's andmaximum RPD's or %D.
10005
INTERNAL STANDARDS: All internal standard areas andtimes were within the QC limits.
HOLDING TIMES: All samplesrequired holding times.
retention
were analyzed within contract
DILUTIONS: The following samples exceeded the standardcalibration range for one or more analytes and were reanalyzedwith dilution:
CLIENT ID
MW1BMW1CMW1DMW3BMW3CMW9B,MS/MSDMW9C
pH Values: A pHvolatile samples.
NET ID DILUTION
108183108184108185108175108177108171108176
1:101:51:51:1001:10001:101:100
value of 1 was determined for all of the
10000
NET Cambridge Division
ANALYTICAL REPORT
Report To:
Mr. Keith SchillingMontgomery Watson Americas11107 Aurora AvenueDesHoines, IA 50322
Reported By:
National Environmental TestingNET Atlantic, IncorporatedCambridge Division12 Oak ParkBedford, MA 01730
Report Date: 08/31/1994
Project: Low Level Volatiles
P.O. Ho:
Job Description: Rockwell Project
Collected By: Client
NET Job Number: 94.02521
NET Client No: 55500
Shipped Via: FEDEX
Airbill No: 2443301210
This report has been approved and certified for release by the following staff. Please feel free to call the NETProject Manager at 617-275-3535 with any questions or coronents.
Alison P. DarrowNET Project Manager
Report prepared byNET Reports Group
Analytical data for the following samples are included in this data report.
SAMPLEID
MU-9B +MS/MSDMU-9DMU-5DMU-8DMU-3BMU-9CMW-3CMW-3DMU-3EMW-4BMU-4CMU-2BMU-1BMW-1CMU-1DMU-7DFIELD BLANK 1Trip Blank
NETID
108171108172108173108174108175108176108177108178108179108180108181108182108183108184108185108186108187108188
DATETAKEN
08/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/11/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/199408/12/1994
TINETAKEN
07:4511:1512:1513:1014:5010:0015:3015:1016:1016:5017:0018:0008:0008:2009:0009:4008:15
DATEREC'D
08/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/199408/13/1994
MATRIX
GROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERGROUND WATERBLANK
1000?
SAMPLEK>
(PRINT >*ME)
(PRINT NAME)
DATE TIME
R/fllSJS
NATIONALENVIRONMENTALTESTING, INC.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY k JCORDCOMPANYADDRESSPHONEPROJECT NAME/LOCATIONPROJECT NUMBER _____PROJECT MANAGER
C '
REPORT TO:
INVOICE TO:
P.O. NO. _
: C^* Vl/K
T, NET QUOTE NO.
ANALYSES
SAMPLE ID/DESCRIPTION
JL "8COMMENTS
1//L II »e/u MIS' u
fc/u 1310
fooo
i/M/uo
fi/u
AMUCONDITION OF SAMPLE: BOTTLES INTACT? YES / NO
FIELD FILTERED? YES / NOCOC SEALS PRESENT AND INTACT? YES / NOVOLATILES FREE OF HEADSPACE? YES / NO
SAMPLE REMAINDER DISPOSAL: RETURN SAMPLE REMAINDER TO CLIENT VIAI REQUEST NET TO DISPOSE OF ALL SAMPLE REMAINDERS .
TEMPERATURE UPON RECEIPT:
DATE
REfeWDUISHED BY: DATE/TIME RECEIVED BY: RELINQUISHED BY: DATE/TIME 1J1ECEIVED FO?T>JET BY:
MB1MOD OF SHIPMENTO
REMARKS
NATIONALENVIRONMENTALTESTING, INC.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY r CORDCOMPANYADDRESSPHONEPROJECT NAME/LOCATIONPROJECT NUMBERPROJECT MANAGER
C. I
REPORT TO:
INVOICE TO:
P.O. NO. _
ll/l—r
NET QUOTE NO.
CONDITION OF SAMPLE: BOTTLES INTACT? YES / NOFIELD FILTERED? YES / NO
COC SEALS PRESENT AND INTACT? YES / NOVOLATILES FREE OF HEADSPACE? YES / NO
SAMPLE REMAINDER DISPOSAL: RETURN SAMPLE REMAINDER TO CLIENT VIAI REQUEST NET TO DISPOSE OF ALL SAMPLE REMAINDERS
TEMPERATURE UPON RECEIPT:
DATE
RE££UISHEQ.BY:
oDATE/TIME RECEIVED BY- RELINQUISHED BY: DATE/TIME
8-0D OF SHIPMENT REMARKS:
ORGANIC FLAGS AND SAMPLE SUFFIXES
The following qualifiers have been used for reporting results:
B - The "B" flag indicates that the analyte was found in theassociated blank as well as in the sample.
E - The "E" flag indentifies compound concentrations that exceedthe calibration range of the GC/MS instrument. For Benzo (b)and Benzo (k) Flouranthene, the calibration range of eachpeak will be considered separately. Ortho, para, and metaxylene are quantified as two peaks, the calibration range ofeach peak will be considered separately.
D - If a sample is re-analyzed due to high concentrations andboth the original analysis and re-analysis have beenreported, the diluted analysis will have the "DL" suffix.All concentration values reported for the diluted analysiswill be flagged with a "D".
U - The "U" flag indicates that the compound was analyzed for butnot detected. The reported "U" value is the detection limitfor the given compound. The value is corrected fordilution and for percent moisture.
J - The "J" flag indicates an estimated value. The flag is usedfor tentatively identified compounds where a 1:1 response isassumed, or when the mass spectral or chromatographic dataindicate the presence of a compound that meets theidentification criteria but the guantitated value is lessthan the method quantitation limit.
P - The "P" flag indicates that the quantitated value of atarget pesticide/PCB differs by more than 25% on the two GCcolumns that were reported.
Y - Compound values that are flagged with a "Y" have been editedon our RTE/MS data system.
X - Compound values that are flagged with a "X" have been editedon our Foremaster data reporting system.
C - This flag applies to pesticide or GC parameters where theidentification has been confirmed by GC/MS.
The following sample suffixes have been used:
XXXXX = sample numberXXXXXMS = matrix spike sampleXXXXXMSD = matrix spike duplicate sampleXXXXXRE = re-analyzed sampleXXXXXDL = sample analyzed at a secondary dilution inn
EPA CLP 3/90 Deliverables InventoryProject Name: Montgomery WatsonNET Job Numbers: 94.02521FD Number; FD 1203
ITEM PAGE
3. GCMS VOLATILE ORGANIC ANALYSIS DATA
3A. PC Summary -Forms II, III, IV, V3B. Sample Data -Forms I, Ib, Raw Data3C. Standards Data -Forms VI, VII, VIII, Raw Data
Raw QC Data, .,1. BFB Tunes3D2. Blank Data -Form I, Ib, Raw Data3D4. Matrix Spike Data - Form I, Raw Data3D4. Matrix Spike Duplicate - Form I, Raw Data
0000
000100170374
0409041804580468
-'10011
TABLE 1SAMPLE RECEIPT & LOGIN
FD1203
GENERAL COMMENTS: No comments were necessary.
TABLESVOLATILES ORGANICS NARRATIVE SUMMARY
FD1203
GENERAL COMMENTS: The samples were analyzed using a modifiedmethod OLM01.9 with a 25 ml purge for lower detection limits.
The Client requested the laboratory to verify results for sampleMW3C (NET ID 108177) as preliminary results did not matchprevious sample history. Several dilutions had been analyzed andresults were consistant. The sample vials were checked forsample ID and everything appears to be correct.MANUAL INTEGRATIONS: Manual integrations are performed onstandards and samples when the integration is not complete due topeak shape and chromatography. This is confirmed by visualinspection by the analysts. The "M" flag indicates that a manualintegration has been performed.#17- Total 1,2-Dichloroethene must be integrated in the initialand continuing calibration standards to include the total area ofthe cis- and trans- isomers.SURROGATES: All system monitoring compound recoveries werewithin the contract required QC limits.MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPLICATE(s): All spike recoverieswere within QC limits for the MS/MSD analysis. All RPDs werewithin the required limits.
BLANKS: A method blank was analyzed for each twelve hour timeperiod on each GC/MS system used for analysis. No blankcontained greater than five times the CRQL of Methylene Chloride,Acetone, and 2-Butanone, or greater than or equal to the CRQL ofany other volatile target compound. j
I
TUNE: All instrument performance check criteria were met priorto the start of sample analysis. >
CALIBRATION: All compounds met the required minimum RF's andmaximum RPD's or %D.
INTERNAL STANDARDS: All internal standard areas andtimes were within the QC limits.
retention
HOLDING TIMES: All samplesrequired holding times.
were analyzed within contract
DILUTIONS: The following samples exceeded the standardcalibration range for one or more analytes and were reanalyzedwith dilution:
CLIENT ID
HW1BMW1CMW1DMW3BMW3CMW9B,MS/MSDMW9C
pH Values: A pHvolatile samples.
NET ID DILUTION
108183108184108185108175108177108171108176
1:101:51:51:1001:10001:101:100
value of 1 was determined for all of the
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
FIELDBLK1_^b Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
6C Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !__________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108187
Lab File ID: K3735
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
IJ 74-87-3———————Ch lor ome thane________1 74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________j 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______! 75-00-3———————Chloroethane_________! 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____I 67-64-1————————Acetone______________I 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______• 75-35-4————————1» 1-Dich loroethen*____! 75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane____! 156-60-5——————Trans-l> 2-Dich loroethene.! 156-59-2———————Cis-l« 2-Dich loroethene! 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________I 1O7-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______! 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________i 71-55-6———————1. 1. 1-Trichloroethane___I 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____I 75-27-4———————Bromod ich loromethane____• 78-87-5———————1. 2-Dichloropropane_____! 10061-01-5————cis-1* 3-Dichloropropene_! 79-01-6———————Tr ich loroethene________I 124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____I 79-00-5———————1, !• 2-Trichloroethane___I 71-43-2———————Benzene______________5 10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.I 75-25-2————————Bromoform______________! 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____I 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________I 127-18-4——————Tetrach loroethene_______! 79-34-5———————1, 1, 2i 2-Tetrachloroethane.! 108-88-3——————Toluene____________]I 1O8-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________8 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________! 100-42-5——————Styrene________________] 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________S______________________________________
FORM I VGA
22222822222 iU0. 91J
\!U!U!U:u:uIBIUtuIU:u
2222222222222222222222
IU!U:uiu:u:uiuiu:uiu!U:u:u!Uiu;uiu:u:u:uiu
(uL)
i3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
FIELDBLK1Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! _____
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: <uL)
Number TICs found: 2
Lab Sample ID: 108187
Lab File ID: K3735
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1J CAS NUMBER
J 1. 5410591 2. 556672
COMPOUND NAME
Cyclotrisi loxane* hexamethylCyclotetrasiloxane* octameth
RT 1
20. 74 127. 32 S
JEST. CONC. I Q
4 !BJ1 !J
FORM 1 VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW1BLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 1O8183
Lab File ID: K3749
Date Received: OS/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
(uL)
t
I ~7A — QT— O— — _— — _
! 75-01-4 —————
1 TC f\fy **1 / 3 \J r C»
! 67-64-1 —————• T^ 1 rt__
! 156-60-5 ————i 1 CLZ._^O_*3
! 67-66-3 —————
• o r>* *"
! 75-27-4 —————' TO-.Q~7_ — -.__.-I / €3 O/W — —— • —
1 1O061-01-5 ——
! 79-OO-5 —————1 / i *rO &
! 10061-02-6 ——i / w & w &• 1 OQ 1A—1 __
• «^0 1 ~7Q i.' 1 rJ7— 1 Q_A_____' TO — T/I_^— ____
i XwU *T X *T
• 1 Art— Af3— . __ _
J
-Chloromethane—— Bromome thane—— Vinul Chloride—— Ch 1 or oe thane—— Methylene Chloride—— Acetone—— Carbon Disulfide—— 1* 1-Dichloroethene—— li 1-Dichloroethane—— Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene—— Cis-1. 2-Dichloroethene— Chloroform—— 1* 2-Dichloroethane—— 2-Butanone—— 1. 1* 1-Trichloroethane—— Carbon Tetrachloride—— Bromodi chloromethane—— 1. 2-Dichloroprooane—— cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene—— Trichloroethene—— D i br omoc h 1 or ome thane—— li 1> 2-Trichloroethane—— Benzene—— trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene ___—— Bromof orm—— 4-Methijl-2-Pentanone—— 2-Hexanone—— Tetrachloroethene—— 1* 1, 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane ___— Toluene—— Chlorobenzene—— Ethyl benzene
—— Xylene < total)
0.20.
20.2
— »•• —WKV
2
22222
_ -S22222
22222222
I;u:u
4iJ• ui u ^
!U:u• w:u5;E:u;ui i ii \jiUIU:u:ui i ii \i*f^~ / > f*•*» L v:u;uiU:u:u:u:ui* uIUIU:uIUIUi
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW1BLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 2
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108183
Lab File ID: K3749
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
ii CAS NUMBER} ==s=t=======r======r
5 1.: 2. 556672
•1 COMPOUND NAME{ ============================
! UnknownICyc lotetrasiloxane* octamethI
RT=======: as
20. 7227. 34
EST. CONC.============
22
: i: Q i
: = • = = = = = |
!J !IBJ !
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
ERA SAMPLE NO.
!! MW1BDL! _____
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 53O (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
CAS NO. COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 1O8183DL
Lab File ID: K3758
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 10. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Ch 1 or omethane__________74-83-9————————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________75-00-3———————C h 1 or o e t h an e__________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_____67-64-1———————Ac e tone_______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_______75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene_____75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane_____156-60-5——————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene.156-59-2——————C i s-1, 2-Di c h 1 or oe t h ene_'_67-66-3———————C h 1 or o f orm_____________107-O6-2——————1< 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Br omod i c h 1 or omethane____78-87-5———————1. 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-O1-5—————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Tr i c h 1 or oe th ene_________124-48-1———————Dibromoc hi or omethane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z ene_______________10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromof orm______________1O8-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-He xanone_____________127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5————————1. li 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.1O8-8S-3———————To 1 u ene________________108-9O-7———————Chlorobenzene___________100-41 -4——————E t h y 1 b en z ene___________100-42-5——————S t y r en e___________________1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________
2O20202010202020203
38O2020202020202020602O20202020202032O2020202O20
iU!U!U!U!BJ:u:uIU:uui!U!Utu:uiU!UiU:ui:u!Utu!Usu:u!U!J!UiU!U!U:uiU
FORM I VOA 3/9O
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW1BDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! _____
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Lab Sample ID: 108183DL
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K3758
08/13/94
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Number TICs found:
Date Analyzed: 08/19/74
Dilution Factor: 10.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CA5 NUMBER
1. 5410592. 556672
: :! COMPOUND NAME iJ —— a —————— ss= —— a=_a==aa —— aa —— aa ', =
'Cyc lotrisi loxane* hexametyl-i•Cyclotetrasiloxane* octameth!
RT
20. 7427. 29
EST. CONC.
28010
i !i Qi =====!BJ!BJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9O
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
!! MW1C
Lab Name: CAMBRG Contract: MONTGOMERY !________
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 108184
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3750
Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/94
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
ID: 0. 530 (mm)
<uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________74-83-9————————Bromomethane____________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————Ch 1 or oe thane___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1 ———————Ac e tone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________75-35-4———————If 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5——————Trans-lf 2-Dichloroethene_156-59-2———————Ci*-l,2-Dichloroethene___67-66-3———————C h 1 or o for m_____________107-06-2———————1. 2-Dich lor o ethane______78-93-3———————2-B u t an on e_____________71-55-6———————1* 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————If 2-Dich 1 oropropane_____1O061-01-5—————cis-lf 3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromoch lor ome thane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z en e________________10061-02-6—————trans-1* 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Br omo f or m______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____591 -78-6——————2-He x an on e_______________127-18-4———————Te t r a c hloroeth en e_______79-34-5———————li If 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.1O8-88-3———————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________100-42-5——————Styrene_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
220.9
\:u!U
6iJIY
0. 5IBJ22321
140222222226222162222
iU!UI:u
:uiUIU:uiU!UtuIU\CIUIU
:u!U:u:u
0. 4! J2 !U0. 7IJ0. 3!J2 :u2 IU0. 61JY
(uL)
TV
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
MW1CContract: MONTGOMERY I___
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Lab Sample ID: 108184
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K3750
08/13/94
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER
1.2.3. 556672
i !! COMPOUND NAME !
'Unknown 1lUnknown 5! Cy c lotetrasi loxane* octameth!I \
RT
6. 7820. 7027. 32
EST. CONC.
121
•! Q5 =====!J!J:BJI1
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW1CDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108184DL
Lab File ID: K3759
Date Received: O8/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 5.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethan*__________74-83-9———————Br omome t h an e___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————Ch 1 or o e t h an •___________75-O9-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1———————Acetone_____________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroe thane______156-60-5——————Trans-11 2-Di c h 1 or oe t h ene_156-59-2———————Cim-1* 2-Dichloroethene__67-66-3———————Ch 1 or o f or m_____________107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-Bu t an on e_______________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 orid•____75-27-4———————Bromod i c h 1 orome thane____78-87-5———————li 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-O1-5—————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-O1-6———————Tr i c h 1 or oe thene_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1. 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z en e________________10061-02-6————trans-l> 3-Dichloropropen»_75-25-2———————Br omo f or m______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5————————1, 1. 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 uene________________1O8-9O-7———————Ch 1 or ob en z ene__________1OO-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________100-42-5——————Styren*_______________1330-2O-7——————Xylene (total)__________
10101011414103102
1601O1010101010101074101O18101010101010101O101O1O
I:u!U:uIY!BJ:B:uuiu!JI:u!UIU:uiuiuiUiuiiuiui!U:uiuiu!U!UIUIU:u:uiui
(uL)
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
! MW1CDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 2
O. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108184DL
Lab File ID: K3759
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 5.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
11 GAS NUMBER} ================! 1.! 2. 556672
!! COMPOUND NAME} ==s=s==s==es==i==ss=5=sassa!=ar=====s===s
! UnknownICyc lotetrisi loxanei octamethi
RT========20. 7527. 32
EST. CONC.=============
255
1Q :
===== jj ;BJ !___ s
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW1DLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O.53O (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
Contract: MONTGOMERY !__________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108185
Lab File ID: K3751
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
COMPOUNDCONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3 ——————— Chloromethane ________74-83-9 ——————— Bromome thane _________75-01-4 ——————— Vinyl Chloride _______75-00-3 ——————— Chloroethane _________75-09-2 ——————— Me t h y 1 ene Ch 1 or i d e ____67-64-1 ——————— Ac et one ______________75-15-0 ——————— Carbon Disulfide ______75-35-4 ———————— 1 , 1-Di c h 1 oroe t h ene ____75-34-3 ——————— 1. 1-Di Chloroethane ____156-60-5 —————— Trans-l» 2-Dich loroethene.156-59-2 ——————— Ci s-1, 2-Dich loroethen* _ '_67-66-3 ——————— Ch 1 or o f or m _____________1 07-06-2 ——————— 1 , 2-D ichloroet h an e ______78-93-3 ——————— 2-Butanone ____________71-55-6 ——————— 1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane ___56-23-5 ——————— Carbon Te tr ac h 1 or i d e ____75-27-4 ——————— Bromod ich loromethane ____78-87-5 ——————— 1. 2-Dich 1 or opropane _____1O061-O1-5 ————— cis-li 3-Dichloropropen* __79-01-6 ——————— Trichloroethene ________124-48-1 —————— Dibromochloromethan* ____79-00-5 ——————— 1, 1, 2-Trich lor oe thane ___71-43-2 ——————— Ben z ene ________________10061-02-6 ————— trans-1* 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2 ———————— Bromoform ______________108-1O-1 ——————— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone ____591-78-6 —————— 2-Hexanone _____________127-18-4 ——————— Tetrachloroethene _______79-34-5 ——————— 1, li 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.1 08-88-3 —————— To 1 u en e ________________108-90-7 —————— C h 1 or o b en z ene __________100-4 1 -4 —————— E t h y 1 b en z en» ___________100-42-5 —————— Styrene _______________
1 133O-20-7 —————— Xylene (total) __________
2 SU2 iU0. 4SJ2 !U0. 4SBJ3 IB2 !U0. 81 J2
872220.2222272222222O.222222
!U
\£:uIU!U
2!JIUIUIUIUIIU!UIUIU:uIUIU
21 J:uIUIUIUIUIUI
(jj
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 53O (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW1D
<uL)
Number TICs found:
Contract: MONTGOMERY !_____________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108185
Lab File ID: K3751
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL>
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/L
!i CAS NUMBERj ================! 1. 541059i 2. 556672
i! COMPOUND NAMEj ============================iCyclotrisi loxane> hexamethyliCyclotetrasi loxanei octamethi
RT========20. 7227. 29
EST. CONC.=============
261
11 Qi =====:BJ!BJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW1DDL
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 1O8185DL
Lab File ID: K3760
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/74
Dilution Factor: 5. O
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————C hlorometh ane__________74-83-9————————Bromome thane____________75-O1-4————————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1———————Ac etone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfid*________75-35-4————————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1» 1-Dichloroet h an e______156-60-5——————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene_156-59-2——————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene___67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________107-O6-2——————1.2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3———————2-Butanon«_____________71-55-6———————1, 1. 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5————————1. 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061-O1-5—————ci*-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroeth en e_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1, 1. 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene_75-25-2———————Br omo form______________108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone_____591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5————————1. 1. 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Ch 1 or o b en z ene__________100-41-4——————Ethyl benzene___________100-42-5——————S t y r en e_______________133O-2O-7——————Xylene (total)__________
101O10103101O1010190101O101010101010311O101010101010101O1010101010
J:uiU!UIU;BJ;u;u;u!U\j
!U:u:uiuiuiuiuiiuiuiu!U:u:u!U;u:u:uiuiuiuiui
(uL)
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW1DDLi_.o Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRO
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found: 2
Lab Sample ID: 1O8185DL
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K376O
08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 5.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER
1. 5410592. 556672
•1 COMPOUND NAME
!Cy c lotrisi loxane* hexamethgl!Cyc lotetrasi loxane< octameth1
1
RT S
20. 7O !27. 32 !
1
EST. CONC.
203
: !1 Q 1
= 5 ===== •:BJ i!BJ !! !
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
! MW2BContract: MONTGOMERY S_____Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 108182
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3748
Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/94
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chl or ome thane___________74-83-9————————Bromome thane____________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————C h 1 or o e than*___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1 ———————Ac e tone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_______75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroe thane______156-60-5——————Trans-li 2-Dichloroethen»_156-59-2———————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene__67-66-3———————C h 1 or o f orm_____________107-06-2———————1, 2-Dich 1 oroethane______78-93-3————————2-Bu t an on e_______________71-55-6———————1» 1* 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Br omod i c h 1 or omethane____78-87-5———————1 • 2-Di c h 1 or opr opane_____10061-01-5—————cis-1* 3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromoc hi or omethane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2————————Benzene________________10061-02-6————trans-1. 3-Dichloropropen«.75-25-2———————Bromof orm_____________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Chl or ob en z ene__________1OO-41-4———————Ethyl benzene___________100-42-5———————Styrenc________________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
222020. 412222O. 222222222222222222222222
I:uIUsJU;BJ:BJ:u!Uiu!Uu:uiu:u:u!Utuiu:uiu:uiu:u:u!Uiuiuiu:u:uiu:uiuiui
(uL)
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
! MW2BLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: <soi1/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 <mm)
Soil Extract Volume: <uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 1O8182
Lab File ID: K3748
Date Received: 08/13/74
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
]i CAS NUMBERj =================! 1. 541059i 2. 556672*
1
! COMPOUND NAME{ ============================SCyc lotr isi loxane* hexamethyl!Cyc lotetrasi loxane. octamethJ
RT========20. 7227. 29
I! EST. CONC.j =============: 4: i:
i :i Q i• ===== \:BJ ::BJ :! !
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
ERA SAMPLE NO.
! MW3B!
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108175
Lab File ID: K3721
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I! 74-87-3———————Chloromethane________! 74-83-9———————Bromomethane_________I 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______I 75-00-3———————Ch loroethane_________I 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____! 67-64-1———————Acetone_____________I 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_____I 75-35-4————————li 1-Dich loroethene____I 75-34-3———————li 1-Dich loroethane____I 156-60-5——————Trans-li 2-Dichloroethene.I 156-59-2——————Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene! 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________I 1O7-O6-2———————1. 2-Dichloroethane______1 78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________! 71-55-6———————1, It 1-Trichloroethane___I 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____i 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____! 78-87-5———————1. 2-Dich lor opropane_____I 10061-01-5—————cis-li3-Dichloropropene__I 79-O1-6———————Trichloroethene_________5 124-48-1———————Dibromochloromethane____J 79-OO-5———————1, 1,2-Trichloroethane___I 71-43-2———————Benzene________________I 10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.I 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________8 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____S 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone_____________I 127-18-4———————Te tr a c hloroeth en e_______! 79-34-5———————1, If2>2-TetrachloroethaneI 108-88-3——————Toluene_______________"_I 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene__________I 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________I 100-42-5——————Styrene________________I 1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________I___________________________________
FORM I VOA
22
13002222
13O0.1216022222222
16O2213222220.0.20.21
IUiUIEiU:uIU
6!JJXTIUIU:u:uIUiU!U!U
iUIU1IU:u!U!UIU
3IJ5IJIU
6IJIUIJY1
(uL)
r-
3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
,_ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
MW3BContract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL> ML
Level: (loui/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 108175
Lab File ID: K3721
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: O8/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER
1. 5410592. 556672
COMPOUND NAME
Cyc lotrisi loxane/ hexamethylCyclotetrasi loxanei octameth
! RT
! 20. 72! 27. 32I
EST. CONC.
41
: :: Q ;• ===== «:BJ i\j \\ \
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE GRGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3BDLLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: MONTGOMERY !_________
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 1O8175DL
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3737
Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/94
7. Moisture: not dec.
OC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 100.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg> UG/L Q
74-87-3————————C h 1 or ome t h ane___________74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________7 5-00-3———————C hloroethan •___________75-09-2———————Me t h y lene Chlorid e______67-64-1———————Acetone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————li 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5———————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroeth*ne_156-59-2——————Cis-1, 2-Dich 1 oroethene__67-66-3———————C h1 or o f or m____________107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethana______78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________71-55-6———————1, 1. 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Te trac h 1 or i d e____75-27-4———————Bromod ich loromethane____78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061-O1-5—————c is-1.3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroethen e_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1, I, 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z en e________________10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromoform______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————!• 1. 2/ 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzena___________100-42-5——————Styrene_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
2OO20018OO200633002001402002OO24OO20O2002OO20O2OO2OO20020O5802002002002002002OO2002002002002OO200200200
I!U:uIIU:BJIB:u!JIUIUIB!U:u!U!UiUiU:u!UI:u!U:u:u:u:u$u:u:u:usuIUIUIUi_
(uL)
FORM I VGA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW3BDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soi1/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 108175DL
Lab File ID: K3737
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 100.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
Ji CAS NUMBERJ =5== = === = = = = = = = = =
J 1. 541059! 2. 556672
! COMPOUND NAMEj ============================ICyclotrisi loxane/ hexamethyl!Cy c lotetrasi loxane/ octameth1
RT========20. 7527. 32
EST. CONC.=============
500100
1Q :
===== {BJ !J i
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
I
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3CName: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: (low/med) LOW
7, Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !_________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108177
Lab File ID: K3723
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Ch 1 or ome t h ane___________74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1————————Ac et one________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide________75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————li 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5——————Trans-1» 2-Di c h 1 or oe t h ene_156-59-2——————Cis-l,2-Dichloroethen«___67-66-3———————Ch 1 or of orm_____________107-O6-2——————l,2-Dichloroethan»______78-93-3————————2-B u t a n on e______________71-55-6————————li 1* 1-Trichloroethane____56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromod ich loromethane____78-87-5———————li 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5————cis-1.3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Trich loroethen*_________124-48-1——————Dibromoch loromethane____79-OO-5———————1* 1» 2-Tr ichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z en *________________1O061-O2-6—————trans-1* 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2————————Bromoform______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591 -78-6——————2-He x an on e_____________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1> 2i 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————Toluene________________108-90-7——————Ch lorobenzene___________100-41-4———————Ethylbenzene___________1OO-42-5——————Styrene________________1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________
22
52020.42
2005
1002222222220.2
140222222325222
ItUtUSEYtU
2!BJIBIU
tUIUIU!UIUtUtUtUtU
2IJIUIU
tUtUtUtUtUtUstu8!UtYt
<uL)
FORM I VOAI
3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3CContract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
Lab Sample ID: 108177
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K3723
08/13/94
(uL)
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
JJ CAS NUMBERJ ================
! 1. 1108271 2. 541059
COMPOUND NAME============================CyclohexaneCyclotrisi loxane* hexamethyl
RT========
13. 452O. 74
!
EST. CONC.=============
12
Q=====JBJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9O
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW3CDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY '.
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (loui/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
CAS NO. COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108177DL
Lab File ID: K3745
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1000. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane________74-83-9————————Br omome t h an e_________75-01-4———————Vingl Chloride_______75-00-3———————Chloroethane_________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1———————Acetone______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______75-35-4———————li 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3——————— 1,1-Dichloroethan e____156-6O-5——————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene.156-59-2———————Ci s-1, 2-Di ch 1 oroethene_'_67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-B u t a n one ______________71-55-6———————1. li 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____7B-87-5———————1. 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061-01-5—————cis-lj 3-Dichloropropenc__79-O1-6————————Trich loroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1. 1* 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene_______________10061-02-6————trans-1.3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Br omo f or m______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591 -78-6——————2-He x an on e_____________127-18-4——————Tetrach loroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1. 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 uene________________108-90-7——————C hlorobenz ene__________100-41-4——————Ethyl b en z en*___________100-42-5——————Styrene________________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
200020009OOO2000430190020002002OOO2OOO38000200020002000200020002000200020OO200O2000200025020002000200020002000200034O2000200020002000
:u:u\iU:BJ:BJ!Utj:u:u:u:u:u:u:u:u!U:u!Utu!U!J:u;u:u:uIU:u:j:u!U!U:u
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3CDLLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY .'
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soi1/uater) WATER
Sample uit/vol: 25. O <g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 1
Lab Sample ID:
Lab File ID:
108177DL
K3745
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1000.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
JJ!{1
CAS NUMBER5=== = === = === = = = = =
1. 541059
i COMPOUND NAMEI ============================iCyclotrisi loxanei hexamethyl1
RT========20. 72
j1 EST. CONC.j =============1 4000!
!! Q{ =====!BJ!
11!!1
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3DLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med> LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
<uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !_________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108178
Lab File ID: K3740
Date Received: 08/13/74
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
! 74-87—3———————Ch loromethane________• 74-83-9———————Bromomethane_________! 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______8 75-00-3———————Chloroethane____________! 75-09-2————————Methylene Chloride____! 67-64-1————————Acetone______________! 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______i 75-35-4———————1. 1-Dichloroethene____• 75-34-3————————1< 1-Dichloroethane____8 156-60-5———————Trans-1, 2-Dichloroethene.! 156-59-2———————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene8 67-66-3———————Chloroform________________8 107-06-2—————— 1, 2-Dichloroethane______8 78-93-3————————2-Butanone________________! 71-55-6————————1, 1, 1-TrichloroethaneI 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____1 75-27-4———————Bromodich loromethane____! 78-87-5————————li 2-Dichloropropane_____I 10061-01-5————c is-1,3-Dichloropropene__I 79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroeth en e________1 124-48-1——————Dibromoch loromethane____8 79-00-5———————1. li 2-Trichloroethane___} 71-43-2———————Benzene________________! 10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.8 75-25-2————————Bromoform______________! 108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____5 591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________8 127-18-4——————Tetrach loroethene_______I 79-34-5———————1. 1* 2i 2-Tetrachloroethane.I 108-88-3———————Toluene________________• 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________! 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________8 100-42-5———————Styrene________________! 1330-20-7——————Xylene < total)__________J_____________________________________
FORM I VOA
227222O.
5iU:u5!U:u:uIU
O. 4IJ0. 28 J0. 48J15 :B
!U:u:u8U!U;u:u:u
22222222322222222222222
S:u!U:u!U
:u:u;u:u:uIU:u!U!U
(uL)
i3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3DLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMDRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! ____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med> LOW
TL Moisture: not dec.
GO Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
0. 530 (mm)
<uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 108178
Lab File ID: K3740
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/74
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/L
: CAS NUMBER !j ================ |: i. iI 2. 556672 !
\
COMPOUND NAME============================UnknownCyclotetrasiloxane. octameth
RT========20. 7427. 31
EST. CONC. 1 Q============= j =====
4 iJ1 ! J
!
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3ELab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108179
Lab File ID: K3741
Date Received: OB/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
5! 74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________! 74-83-9———————Bromomethane___________! 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________\ 75-00-3———————Chloroethane__________1 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride_____! 67-64-1————————Acetone_______________1 75-15-0————————Carbon Disulfide_______! 75-35-4————————1, 1-Dichloroethenc_____! 75-34-3———————1> 1-Dichloroethane_____S 156-60-5———————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene! 156-59-2——————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene_'_\ 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________I 107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______! 78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________S 71-55-6———————li 1» 1-Trichloroethane___! 56-23-5————————Carbon Tetrachloride____! 75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____5 78-87-5——————— 1. 2-Dichloropropane_____! 10061-01-5————cis-li3-Dichloropropene_I 79-01-6———————Trich 1 oroethene________J 124-48-1———————Dibromochloromethane____J 79-OO-5———————1. 1,2-Trichloroethane___I 71-43-2———————Benzene________________! 10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.! 75-25-2————————Bromoform______________I 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____5 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________! 127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______! 79-34-5———————1< 1,2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.! 108-88-3———————Toluene________________! 108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________J 1OO-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________I 100-42-5——————Styrene________________! 133O-20-7——————Xylene <total)__________i_____________________________________
FORM I VOA
2222222222222222222222222222222222
:u:u!U:u;u:B:u:u:u!U:u:u;u!U:u;u:u!U1U!UIUIU:u:u:uIU!U:u!U!UIU:u:u:ui
(uL)
3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW3ELab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! _____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <low/med> LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108179
Lab File ID: K3741
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER
1.2. 556672
11 COMPOUND NAME
{UnknowniCyclotetrasiloxanej octameth
RT
20. 7427. 31
EST. CONC.
41
Q
JJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9O
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW4BLab Name: CAMBRG Contract: MONTGOMERY !________
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER Lab Sample ID: 108180
Sample ut/vol: 25.O (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3746
Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/94
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
S 74-87-3———————Ch loromethane________! 74-83-9————————Bromomethane_________! 75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______S 75-OO-3———————Chloroethane_________• 75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____! 67-64-1———————Acetone______________i 75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______• 75-35-4———————1* 1-Dich loroethene____• 75-34-3———————1» 1-Dich loroethane____I 156-60-5——————Trans-11 2-Dichloroethene.S 156-59-2——————Cis-li 2-Dichloroethene5 67-66-3———————Chloroform_____________! 107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______S 78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________! 71-55-6———————1, 1. 1-TrichloroethaneJ 56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____• 75-27-4———————Bromodich loromethane____S 78-87-5————————li 2-Dichloropropane_____I 10061-01-5—————cis-l« 3-Dichloropropene\ 79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________I 124-48-1——————Dibromoch loromethane____S 79-00-5———————1, 1. 2-Trichloroethane! 71-43-2———————Benzene_______________• 10061-02-6————trans-1.3-Dichloropropene.! 75-25-2———————Bromoform______________5 108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____! 591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________! 127-18-4———————Tetrach loroethene_______! 79-34-5———————li 1* 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.! 1O8-88-3———————Toluene________________! 108-90-7———————Chlorobenzene__________! 100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________! 100-42-5——————Styrene________________I 1330-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________5______________________________________
FORM I VOA
22220.2222222O
222222222222222222222
1:u:u:u;u
3IBJ:u:u;u:u!U!U;u!U!U:u:u;u:u!U:u:u!U:u!U!U:usu:u!U:uiUtu!U:u
(uL)
3/9O
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
i MW4BLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! _____
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soi1/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 2
O. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108180
Lab File ID: K3746
Date Received: O8/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UO/L
CAS NUMBER
1.2. 556672
COMPOUND NAME
UnknounCy c lotetrasi loxane. octameth
11 RT
! 20. 75! 27. 321
EST. CONC.
41
Q
JBJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
_.jb Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW4C
Case No. : FD12O3
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O.53O (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !_________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108181
Lab File ID: K3747
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
(uL)
s
« "7*4 f\n *a— ___1 75-09-2 —————! 67-64-1 —— ——J 75-15-O —————
i / w*r wS 156-60-5 ————
! 67-66-3 —— ——1 107-06-2 ————» "7CJ O*3 *3— _ _
! 71-55-6 —————1 fc/O KW V
1 / fc/ K / *t
S 10061-01-5 ——• 7O rt1 A— — — —
• "7o_r»r> ^_____1 T1— A*3— O ___ —
! 10061-02-6 ——
! 1 f\O 1 f\ 1 __— _' *4O1 _~7Q A___ _i W7 A / w O
1 / v O*r \s1 4 r\Q QQ *3
1 100-42-5 ————
{
—— Chl or ome thane—— Bromome thane—— Vinyl Chloride—— Chl or oe thane—— Methylene Chloride—— Acetone—— Carbon Disulfide—— 1* 1-Dichloroethene—— li 1-Dichloroethane—— Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene—— Cis-1* 2-Dichloroethene—— Chloroform—— 1» 2-Dich loroethane—— 2-Butanone—— 1« 1* 1-Tr ich loroethane—— Carbon Tetrachloride—— Bromodichloromethane—— 1» 2-Dich loropropane—— cis-li 3-Dichloropropene—— Tr ichloroethene—— Dibromochloromethane—— 1* 1* 2-Trichloroethane—— Benzene—— trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene ___—— Bromof orm—— 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone—— 2 Hexanone—— Tetrachloroethene—— li 1, 2.1 2-Tetrachloroethane ___— —To 1 uene—— Chlorobenzene—— Ethy 1 benzene—— Sturene—— Xylene (total)
20.22222122222222O.22222222222222
i•!U:u;ui..• j
5 1 D 1I O-Ji OIU:uIUIUuIUIUIUl i t1 V
:u:ui i ii UIU
4IJIUiU:u!UIUiU:uIUIUIUIU:u:u!Ui
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
MW4CContract: MONTGOMERY I___
Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 2
O.530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108181
Lab File ID: K3747
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: OS/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
:5 CAS NUMBER• ================I 1. 5410591 2. 556672
!! COMPOUND NAMEJ ============:==:==============
! Cyc lotr isi loxane. hexamethyl!Cyc lotetrasi loxane. octameth8
II RT| ========
5 20. 72S 27. 34!
EST. CONC.==:===========
41
; ;: Q ;j ===== »:BJ!BJ !! !
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW5DName: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25. O (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou»/med> LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108173
Lab File ID: K3719
Date Received: O8/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Ch 1 or ome thane________74-83-9————————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______75-OO-3———————Ch loroethane_________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1———————Ac etone______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______75-35-4———————1. 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3———————If 1-Dich loroethane____156-60-5———————Trans-li 2-Dichloroethene.156-59-2———————Cis-11 2-Dich 1 oroethene___67-66-3———————C h 1 or o f or m_____________107-06-2———————1. 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-B u t an on e______________71-55-6———————I, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Br omo d i c h 1 or ome t h an e____78-87-5———————If 2-Di ch loropropane_____1O061-01-5—————cis-li 3-Dichloropropene__79-O1-6———————Tr ichloroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-OO-5———————li If 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben 2 e n e _______________10061-02-6————trans-lf 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Br omo f orm______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591 -78-6———————2-He x a n on e______________127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5————————li 1, 3* 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Ch 1 or ob en z ene__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________1OO-42-5——————Styrene________________133O-2O-7——————Xylene (total)__________
2222232222222222222222222222222222
I!UIUiU;uiuIB!U!U!U!U!UiU!U:u!UiUiUIU!UIUtuIU:u!U:u:u;u:u:u:uiuiuiuiui
(uL)
FORM I VGA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW5D^b Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soi1/uater> WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 2
O. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108173
Lab File ID: K3719
Date Received: O8/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER========:======= =
1. 5410592. 556672
\\ COMPOUND NAME: j =======::=======•=====:====:=== = =
ICyclotrisi loxane< hexamethylICyclotetrasiloxane* octameth1
RT========:
20. 7227. 34
EST. CONC.==s=sss=a=ai=sssss===
51
ii Q 15 ===== j:BJ i!J i1 i
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
i MW7D<jb Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !__________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108186
Lab File ID: K3757
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
(uL)
!i /H o/ %j
\ 75-01-4 —————J 75-00-3 —————• / 3 \J 7 Cfc
! 67-64-1 —————! 75-15-0 —————! 75-35-4 —————• T^_*a/l O— .
! 156-60-5 ————! 156-59-2 ————
• TO— 0*3 *a_ _! 71-55-6 —————i ^O ew w
! 10061-01-5 ——1 79-01-6 —————
! 79-00-5 —————1 71-43-2 —————t iwVOl V/«£ O• "7 — O«4— ?3 — — — —
1 108-10-1 ————! ^Q 1 _~7Q_-/._ _
i i & / A o *?• 7Q— 'JA ^_ ________t / T O*r »/
t f O O/% *7
J 100-41-4 ————! 100-42-5 ————1 1330-2O-7 ———J
—— Ch 1 or ome thane—— Bromome thane—— Vinul Chloride—— Ch 1 or oe thane—— Methglene Chloride—— Acetone—— Carbon Disulfide—— li 1-Dichloroethene—— 1> 1-Dichloroethane—— Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene ____—— Cis-l» 2-Dichloroethene—— Chloroform—— 1* 2-Dichloroethane
—— 1» 1» 1-Tr ichloroethane—— Carbon Tetrach lor ide—— Bromod ich lor ome thane—— 1. 2-Dichloropropane—— cis-li 3-Dichloropropene—— Trichloroethene—— Dibromoch lor ome thane—— 1> 1> 2-Trichloroethane—— Benzene—— trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene ___
—— 4-Methvl-2-Pentanone—— 2 Hexanone—— Tetrachloroethene—— 1» 1* 2i 2-Tetrachloroethane ___—— Toluene—— Chlorobenzene—— Ethul benzene—— Sturene—— Xulene (total)
2O
221220.22522102222242222222222222
! 2I
1:u!U:u:u;BJ!U:u
2!J!U:ui:utui!U!U:u:uIUi:u!U!U:u:u:u:u:u:u:uIUIU:uIU!
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
ERA SAMPLE NO.
! MW7D!______
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: <uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 108186
Lab File ID: K3757
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
!IS==11«
CAS NUMBER5=S= = = SS=== = = = = SB
1. 5410592. 556672
{! COMPOUND NAME
= J ============================ICycltrisiloxane. hexamethyl-! Cyc lotetrasi loxane> octamethI
I\ RT} ========S 20. 70! 27. 32
EST. CONC.=============
41
\ \1 Q5 =====:BJ!BJ1I
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW8Di_ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3
Matrix: (soil/mater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0.530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
<uL)
COMPOUND
Contract: MONTGOMERY !_________
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 108174
Lab File ID: K3720
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: O8/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
I5 74-87-3———————Ch 1 oromethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______75-00-3———————Ch 1 or o e t h ane_________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1 ———————Ac e tone_____________75-15-O———————Carbon Disulfide______75-35-4———————1« 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3————————1> 1-Dich loroethane____156-6O-5——————Trans-1f 2-Dich 1 oroethene.156-59-2——————Cis-lf 2-Dichloroethene___67-66-3———————C h 1 or o f orm_____________107-06-2——————li 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-B u t an one______________71-55-6———————I. 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromod ich loromethane____78-87-5———————If 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5—————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr i c h 1 or o e t h en e_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Tr ich loroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2————————Br omo form______________1O8-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————If If 2f 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————Toluene_______________108-90-7——————Ch 1 or ob en z ene__________100-41-4——————Eth y 1 b en z ene___________100-42-5——————S t y r en e_______________1330-20-7——————Xylene <total)__________
2222232222
\iu:u!Utu:uIB!U:u!U!U
0. 6IJ2222222222222222
!UIUIU!UIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIU;u:u:u:u
O. 6IJ222222
:u!Uiuiu:u:ui
<uL)
FORM I VGA 3/9O
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
TENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW8D__«b Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY I
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
Z Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Lab Sample ID: 108174
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K3720
O8/13/94
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Number TICs found:
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg> UG/L
] 2] CAS NUMBER ',2 ================ jJ 1. 541057 !i 2. 556672 1! 1
COMPOUND NAME3=SB=ssB5====s=====s5ai==s=s==s=====s!a::
Cyclotrisi loxane. hexamethylCyc lotetrasi loxane* octameth
S! RTi ========S 20. 70! 27. 32I
EST. CONC.=============
21
Q=====JJ
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/9O
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMBRG
EPA SAMPLE NO.
! MW9BContract: MONTGOMERY
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample wt/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108171
Lab File ID: K3717
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Ch 1 or omethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______75-00-3———————Chl or oe thane_________75-09-2———————Me t h y lene Chl or id e____67-64-1———————Ac et one______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_____75-35-4———————li 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3———————I, 1-Dichloroethane____156-60-5———————Trans-1» 2-Di c h 1 or oe th ene.156-59-2———————Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene_1_67-66-3———————Ch 1 or o form_______________1O7-06-2——————1* 2-Di ch lor oe thane______78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromodich loromethane____78-87-5———————li 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061-01-5—————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Trichloroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromoc hi or omethane____79-00-5———————1. 1* 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10061-02-6————trans-li3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Br omo f or m___________________108-10-1——————4-Methyl~2-Pentanone____591-78-6———————2-Hexanone______________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1> 1» 2» 2-Tetrach loroethane.108-88-3———————To 1 u ene________________108-90-7——————Ch 1 or ob en z ene__________1OO-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________1OO-42-5———————Sty r en e________________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
22422
I:u:ui;u!U
0. 6!BJ0. 4IJ622
3802222222252222222
J:uiIEIUIUIU:u:uIU:u:uiIU:u:u:u!U:u
O. 4!222222
!U:uIU:u:uIUi
(uL)
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW9B. b Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY I
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 1
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108171
Lab File ID: K3717
Date Received: OS/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:<ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
It GAS NUMBERI =============I 1. 556672J________
! COMPOUND NAME RT I EST. CONC. !:==={================= ===========J ========)== ====== =====J=====
ICyc lotetrasiloxane, octameth! 27.29 i! ________________________ S _______ I
IJI
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW9BDLi_ab Name: CAMBRG Contract: MONTGOMERY !________
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD12O3 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER Lab Sample ID: 108171DL
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML Lab File ID: K3728
Level: (lou/med) LOW Date Received: 08/13/94
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
<uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 10.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg> UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane___________74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-OO-3———————Chloroethane___________75-09-2———————Meth y 1 ene Ch 1 or i de______67-64-1———————Acetone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______'75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5———————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene_156-59-2——————Cis-1, 2-Dich loroethene___67-66-3———————C h 1 or o f or m_____________107-06-2——————1, 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-B u t an one______________71-55-6———————1. 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Te trac h 1 or i d *____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————1» 2-Dich 1 oropropane_____10061-01-5—————cis-li3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Trich loroethene_________124-48-1——————Dibromoch lor ome thane____79-OO-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10O61-02-6—————trans-1* 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromof orm______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591 -78-6——————2-He x an on e_____________127-18-4——————Te trac h loroethene_______79-34-5———————li It 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u e n e________________108-90-7———————Ch 1 or ob en z ene___________10O-41-4——————Ethyl benzene___________1OO-42-5———————S t y r e n e________________1330-20-7—————Xylen* (total)_________
20205
2O519205202
38O2O2O2O20202020206202O202020202020202020202020
!U!UiJ:uIBJ1BJ:u!JiUIJ!B!UiUIU!UIUIUIUIUIJIUIU!U:u:u!U:u:u:u:uIU:uIU:u
(uL)
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW9BDL^b Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 108171DL
Lab File ID: K3728
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 10. 0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
! CAS NUMBERJ ================I 1. 541059t 2. 556672J
! COMPOUND NAMEI ============================iCyclotrisiloxanei hexamethyliCyclotetrasiloxanei octameth
\ RTj ========! 20. 74! 27. 32J
EST. CONC. ! Q============= j =====
40 :BJ10 !J
FORM I VOA-TIC 3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
\I MW9C
Lab Name: CAMBR6
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY I
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
Lab Sample ID: 108176
Lab File ID: K3722
Date Received: 08/13/74
Z Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
(uL)
-Chloromethane_-Bromomethane__-Vinyl Chloride.-Chloroethane__Methylene Chloride.Acetone__________Carbon Disulfide______1»1-Dichloroethene____1,1-Dichloroethane____Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene.Cis-l» 2-Dichloroethene_Chloroform_________________
74-87-3—————74-83-9————75-01-4—————75-00-3————75-09-2—————67-64-1————75-15-O————75-35-4—————75-34-3————156-60-5————156-59-2————67-66-3————107-06-2————78-93-3—————71-55-6—————56-23-5—————75-27-4————78-87-5————10061-01-5——79-01-6—————124-48-1———79-00-5—————71-43-2—————10061-02-6——75-25-2—————108-10-1———591-78-6————127-18-4————79-34-5—————108-88-3———— ______108-90-7——————Ch 1 or ob en z ene100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene_I100-42-5——————Styrene_____1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)
1» 2-Dichloroethane2-Butanone_________1. 1. 1-Trichloroethane.Carbon Tetrachloride_Bromodichloromethane_1.2-Dichloropropane.ci*-l»3-Dichloropropene.Trichloroethene_________-Dibromochloromethane_-1. 1. 2-Trichloroethane.-Benzene____________trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.Bromoform_____________4-Methy1—2-Pentanone.2-He xanone_________-Tetrachloroethene_______-li 1* 2» 2-Tetrachloroethane.-Toluene_______________
22
IIUIU
1500 IE2242
IUIUIBIU
120 fc;0. 61J
17 I150 £2 IU
IU!UIUIUIUIUIU
2222222
380 IE2213222222
IUIUIIUIUIUIUIU:u
0. 51J2 IU0. 61J2 IU1 IJY
I $0478FORM I VOA 3/9O
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
ERA SAMPLE NO.
!! MW9C
_ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL> ML
Level: <loui/med> LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
Number TICs found: 0
0. 530 (mm)
<uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108176
Lab File ID: K3722
Date Received: 08/13/74
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
I\ CAS NUMBERj =========I________
COMPOUND NAME RT I EST. CONC. !
FORM I VOA-TIC
304793/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMERG
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No.: FD1203
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample u»t/vol: 25.0 <g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Contract: MONTGOMERY
ERA SAMPLE NO.
! MW9CDLI________
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL>
COMPOUND
SAS No. : SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 10B176DL
Lab File ID: K3738
Date Received: 00/13/74
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 100.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg> UG/L Q
74-87-3———————C h 1 or ome t h an e__________74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_________75-00-3———————Chloroethane___________75-09-2———————Me t h y lene Chlorid e______67-64-1———————Acetone_______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide_______75-35-4———————1, 1 -Di c h 1 or oe t h ene______75-34-3———————1* 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5——————Trans-1» 2-Di c h 1 or o e th ene_156-59-2——————Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene__67-66-3———————C h 1 or o form____________107-06-2—————— 1, 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________71-55-6———————!• If 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————li 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-O1-6———————Trichloroethene________124-48-1——————Dibromochl or omethane____79-OO-5———————1, 1. 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————Ben z ene________________10061-02-6—————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromof orm_____________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591 -78-6——————2-He x an on e_____________127-18-4——————Tetrach loroethene_______79-34-5———————it 1, 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————T o 1 u e n e _______________108-9O-7———————C hlorobenz ene___________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________1OO-42—5———————Sty r en e ________________1330-20-7—————Xylene <total)_________
20020021002005620020016020020027002002002OO2OO20020020020O5802002OO20O2OO200200200200200200200200200200
\IU!U!!U!BJ:uIUIJ:u!UIBiUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIU
(uL)
FORM I VGA304803/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
!! MW9CDL
i_ab Name: CAMDRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ! _____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med> LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
Lab Sample ID: 108176DL
Lab File ID:
Date Received:
K3738
O8/13/94
(uL)
Number TICs found:
11 CAS•=====1 1.I
NUMBER===«===:===:=
11 COMPOUND{ =========:=:======:
• Unknownt
NAMEJ
RT J======== j
20. 74 J1
EST. CONC.
400
11 ••••«
IJ1
Q===•
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 100.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
FORM I VOA-TIC30481
3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY ____
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
ERA SAMPLE NO.
! MW9DI______
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
TL Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108172
Lab File ID: K3734
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: O8/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane__________74-83-7———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-00-3———————Ch 1 or oe thane___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1———————Ac e tone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Bisulfide________75-35-4———————1. 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3——————— 1,1-Dichloroethan e______156-60-5——————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethen»_156-59-2——————Cis-l,2-Dichloroethene__67-66—3———————C h 1 or o f or m_____________107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3———————2-B u t an on e____________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Te tr a c h 1 or i d •____75-27-4———————Br omod i chloromethane____78-87-5———————1. 2-Di c h 1 or opr opane_____1O061—01-5————cis-li3-Dichloropropene_79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroeth en •_________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————It 1. 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene_______________10061-02-6————trans-1* 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromof orm______________108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-He x an on e_____________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1» It 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u en e_______________108-90-7——————C hlorobenz en e__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________100-42-5——————Sty r en e_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
2222222
I:u!Utu;uIU!U!U
0. 2!JIUIU
2212 IB22222222522222222222222
(uL)
IUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIU:uIUiuIU!u 30482
FORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
MW9DLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108172
Lab File ID: K3734
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
CAS NUMBER===sss=ar=Ksa:sB=====ss
1. 5410592. 556672
COMPOUND NAME============================Cyclotrisiloxane* hexamethylCy c lotetrasi loxanei octameth
RT========
20. 7427. 31
EST. CONC.=============
51
1\ Q} =====!BJIJI
FORM I VOA-TIC30483
3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERYI TRIPBLK5________
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108188
Lab File ID: K3736
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/74
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg> UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vingl Chloride_______75-00—3———————C hloroeth an e_________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1———————Acetone_____________75-15-0———————Carbon Di sulf ide_____75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3———————1, 1-Dich loroethane____156-60-5——————Trans-1* 2-Dichloroethene.156-59-2——————C i s-1 * 2-D ichloroeth ene__67-66-3———————Ch 1 oroform______107-06-2———————1,2-Dich loroethane______78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________71-55-6———————1, 1. 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carb on Te tr a c h 1 or i d e____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————1> 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5————cis-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01-6———————Tr ichloroeth ene________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71 -43-2———————B e n z e n e_______________10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene_75-25-2———————Br omo f orm______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________127-18-4———————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3———————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7———————C hlorobenzen e___________100-41-4——————Ethyl benzene___________100-42-5——————Sty r ene_______________
)-20-7——————Xylene (total)__________
2222
IIUIUIUIU
0. 8IBJ22222222222222222222222222222
IUIU!UIUIUIUIUIU
IUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUI It
IUIUIUIUIUIUIUI
(uL)
FORM I VGA
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
TRIPBLKLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Lab Sample ID: 108188
Lab File ID: K3736
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
Number TICs found:CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
II CAS NUMBERI ================
1 1. 541059I 2. 556672
COMPOUND NAME============================Cyclotrisiloxanei hexamethylCyclotetrasi loxane* octameth
RT========2O. 7427. 29
EST. CONC.=============
41
Q=====BJJ
FORM I VOA-TIC
304853/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Name: CAMBRG Contract: MONTGOMERY
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW9BMS
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 108171MS
Lab File ID: K3732
Date Received: OS/13/94
Date Analyzed: OB/17/94
Dilution Factor: 10.0
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______75-00-3———————Chl or oe thane_________75-O9-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1 ———————Ac e tone______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______75-35-4———————1, 1-Di c h 1 or oe thene____75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane____156-60-5——————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene.156-59-2——————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene__67-66-3———————C h 1 or o form____________107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-Butanone______________71-55-6———————1* 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————1, 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5————cis-1* 3-Dichloropropene_79-01-6———————Tr i chl or oe thene________124-48-1——————Dibromoch lor ome thane____79-OO-5———————1, 1* 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10061-02-6—————trans-1. 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromof orm______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________127-18-4——————Te t ra c h 1 or o e t h ene_______79-34-5———————1, li 2. 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 uene_______________108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene___________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene___________1OO-42-5———————Sty r en e________________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
202O420520495203
33020202O2O2020202011020201102O2020202020100110202O20
iIU!U!J!U!BJ!U!JIiU1JIB:u!UtuIUIUIUIUIUIIUIUIiUIU!UIUIUIUIIIUIUIUI
(uL)
30494FORM I VOA
I3/9O
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
MW9BMSDLab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY l___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 10B171MSD
Lab File ID: K3733
Date Received: 08/13/94
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 10. O
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chloromethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride_______75-00-3———————Chl or oe thane_________75-09-2———————Me t h y lene Chl or id e____67-64-1———————Acetone_____________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulfide______75-35-4———————1, 1-Dich loroethene____75-34-3———————1, 1-Dich loroethane____156-60-5———————Trans-l» 2-Dich loroethene.156-59-2——————Cis-li 2-Dich loroethene67-66-3———————Ch lorof orm______________107-06-2——————1, 2-Dich loroethane______78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 oride____75-27-4———————Bromodichlorornethane____78-87—5———————li 2-Dichloropropane_____1OO61-01-5—————cis-1. 3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroethen e________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-OO-5———————1,1, 2-Tr ichloroet h an e___71 -43-2———————B e n z e n e _______________10061-02-6————trans-l« 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone_____________127-18-4——————Tetrach loroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1. 2* 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3———————Toluene________________108-90-7——————Ch 1 or ob en z ene__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________100-42-5——————Sty r e n e_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
20202204292094202
3002020202020202020no2020100202020202O2011011020202O
IiUiUIJ:u!BJIBIU1IUIJIBIUIUIUIUiuIUIUIU1!UIU1IUIUIU:uIUIU1
1
IUIUIU1
(uL)
P0495FORM X VOA
i3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
i_ab Name: CAMBRG
ERA SAMPLE NO.
! VBLK081694KContract: MONTGOMERY
Lab Code: CAMBRG Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3716
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1. O
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL>
COMPOUND
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3———————Chloromethane________74-83-9———————Bromome thane_________75-01-4———————Vingl Chloride_______75-00-3———————C h 1 or o ethane_________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride____67-64-1———————Ac e tone____________75-15-O———————Carbon Disulfide_____75-35-4———————1. 1-Dichloroethene____75-34-3———————I, 1-Dichloroethane____156-60-5———————Trans-l» 2-Dichloroethene156-59-2——————Cis-1,2-Dichloroethene_1_67-66-3———————Ch lor of orm____________107-O6-2———————i, 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3———————2-B u t a none____________71-55-6———————1, 1, 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrach 1 ori d•____75-27-4———————Bromodichloromethane____78-87-5———————1> 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061-01-5—————cis-1* 3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroethe n e________124-48-i———————Dibromochloromethane____79-OO-5———————li 1. 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene______________10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________108-10-1———————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6———————2-He xanone_____________127-18-4———————Te trac h loroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3———————Toluene________________108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene__________100-41-4——————Ethylbenzene__________100-42-5——————Sty r en e_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
I!U:u:u!U
0. 4!J1 IJ
!UIUiUIU:u!U;u!U!U!UIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIUIU:u:u:uIUIUIUIUIU
2222222222222222222222222222
(uL)
I 30486FORM I VGA
I3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I II I
! VDLK081694K !Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/uater) MATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 <g/mL> ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: O. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL>
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3716
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/16/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
IIII
CAS
1.
NUMBER===========541O59
I1
ICyc
COMPOUND
lotrisi loxane
NAME
i hexamethyl
RT=====20.
1«
===•72 1
I
EST=====
. CONC.========
3
!!==!J1
1Q !====•
II
FORM I VOA-TIC30487
3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
sVBLK081794K I
_ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25. O (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3727
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
74-87-3———————Chl or ome thane___________74-83-9————————Bromome thane______________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride__________75-OO-3———————C h 1 or o e t h an e___________75-09-2———————Methylene Chloride______67-64-1———————Acetone________________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulf ide_______75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene______75-34-3———————1, 1-Dichloroethane______156-60-5———————Trans-li 2-Dichloroethene_156-59-2———————Cis-1, 2-Dichloroethene___67-66—3———————C h 1 or o form____________107-06-2——————1,2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3————————2-B u t a n on e______________71-55-6———————1, li l-Trichloroeth«ne___56-23-5———————Carbon Tetrachloride____75-27-4———————Bromodich lor ome thane____78-87-5———————1> 2-Dichloropropane_____1O061—01—5—————ci»-l» 3-Dichloropropene__79-01—6———————Tr i c h 1 or oe th ene_________124-48-1———————Dibromochloromethane____79-00-5———————1, 1, 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Benzene________________10061-02-6————trans-l» 3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Bromoform_____________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6——————2-Hexanone____________127-18-4——————Tetrachloroethene_______79-34-5———————1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3———————To 1 u en e________________108-90-7——————Chlorobenzene_______________1OO-41-4——————Ethyl benzene___________100-42-5——————Sty r en e_______________1330-20-7—————Xylcne (total)_________
2 IU2 IU2 iU2 IU0. 5IJ152222
IIUIUIUIU
0. 3IJ22222222222222222222222
IUIUIU:uiuIUiuiuiuiuiuiuiuiu;uiuiu!Uiuiuiuiuiui
FORM I VOA_3b4883/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
1 !S VBLKOB1794K !
Lab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: <lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: <uL>
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3727
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: OB/17/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
J! CAS NUMBER
i 1. 541059!
11 COMPOUND NAME
ICyclotrisilxanei hexamethyl-J
!RT !
======== •20. 72 I
J
! 1EST. CONC. I Q !
4 SJ !i :
FORM I VOA-TIC
304893/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
t_ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
VBLK081894K !Contract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3744
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CAS NO. COMPOUNDCONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L Q
/ fejw f75-01-4 —— -75-00-3 ———/ W WTr «
67-64-1 ———75-15-0 ———75-35-4 ———75-34-3 ———156-60-5 ——
67-66-3 —— -107-06-2 ——-TO O*3_ 1————— _
71-55-6 ———
10061-01-5-~7O_/11_£._ __
124-48-1 — -79-00-5 ———71-43-2 ———10061-02-6-
/T *3t S
100-41-4 ——100-42-5 ——1330-20-7—
———— Chloromethane———— Bromome thane• ———— Vinul Chloride———— Ch 1 or oe thane- ———— Methglene Chloride———— Acetone• ———— Carbon Disulfide———— 1> 1-Dich loroethene———— 1> 1-Dich loroethane———— Trans-lj 2-Dich loroethene———— Cis-li 2-Dichloroethene
———— 1> 2-Dichloroethane———— 2— B u t a n o n e———— 1. 1> 1— Trich loroethane———— Carbon Tetrachloride• ———— Bromodi Chloromethane———— 1* 2-Dichloropropane———— cis-1* 3-Dichloropropene- ———— Trich loroethene———— Dibromochloromethane———— 1< li 2-Trichloroethane———— Benzene———— trans-1. 3-Dichloropropene ___———— Bromof orm———— 4-Methy 1-2-Pentanone———— 2-Hexanone———— Tetrach loroethene• ——— 1< 1> 2> 2-Tetrachloroethane ___———— Toluene• ———— C h 1 or o b en z ene• ———— Et h y 1 b en z en*• ———— Sturene• ———— Xylene (total)
22220.22222222222222222222222222222
FORM I VOA
\:u:u!U:u
2IJjIUIUIUtu!U!U!UIU!UiuIUIUIUIU:u:uIUIUIU:uIUIU!UIU:u!Uiu ;IU 4t iJ0490
3/90
IEVOLATILE OROANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
EPA SAMPLE NO.
I VBLK081894K !Lab Name: CAMBRO
Lab Code: CAMBRO
Contract: MONTGOMERY \
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
7. Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
Soil Extract Volume: (uL)
Number TZCs found: 2
Lab Sample ID: 6305-081594
Lab File ID: K3744
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/18/94
Dilution Factor: 1.O
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1\ CAS NUMBERj ================: 1. 541059I 2. 556672
COMPOUND NAME============================Cyc lotr isi loxane/ hexamethylCyclotetrasiloxane* octameth
RT========20. 7227. 29
EST. CONC.=============
41
J1 Q| ===8==
IJ;j!
FORM I VOA-TIC
30491
3/90
1AVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
! VBLK081994K !t-ab Name: CAMBRG
Lab Code: CAMBRG
Contract: MONTGOMERY !
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
% Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID: 0. 530 (mm)
SDG No. :
Lab Sample ID: 6305-091594
Lab File ID: K3756
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Extract Volume:
CAS NO.
(uL)
COMPOUND
Soil Aliquot Volume:
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
74-87-3———————Ch loromethane__________74-83-9———————Bromome thane___________75-01-4———————Vinyl Chloride________75-00-3———————C h 1 or o e t h ane___________75-O9-2———————Methylene Chloride_____67-64-1———————Acetone_______________75-15-0———————Carbon Disulf ide_______75-35-4———————1, 1-Dichloroethene_____75-34-3———————1* 1-Dichloroe thane_____156-60-5——————Trans-lf 2-Dichloroethen*.156-59-2———————Cis-1, 2-Dich 1 oroethene_'_67-66-3———————C h1or o f or m_____________107-06-2—————— 11 2-Dichloroethane______78-93-3———————2-Butanone_____________71-55-6———————1, li 1-Trichloroethane___56-23-5———————Car b on Te trac h 1 or i d e____75-27-4———————Bromodich loromethane____78-87-5———————1* 2-Dichloropropane_____10061-01-5—————cis-li3-Dichloropropene__79-01 -6———————Tr ichloroethene _________124-48-1——————Dibromochloromethane____79-OO-5———————1« if 2-Trichloroethane___71-43-2———————Ben z ene_______________10061-02-6————trans-li3-Dichloropropene.75-25-2———————Br omo f orm______________108-10-1——————4-Methyl-2-Pentanone____591-78-6———————2-Hexanone_____________127-18-4——————Te trach 1 or oe thene_______79-34-5———————1, 1, 2, 2-Tetrachloroethane.108-88-3——————To 1 u e n e________________1O8-90-7———————Chlorobenzene___________100-41-4——————Ethyl benzene__________100-42-5——————S t y r ene_______________1330-20-7—————Xylene (total)_________
IIUIUIUIU
0. 5IJ2 I
IUIUIUIUIUIUIUIU:uIU!UIUIUIUIUIU!UIUIUIU:uIU!U:uIUIUIUIU
2222222222222222222222222222
(uL)
IFORM I VOA 3/90
IEVOLATILE ORGANICS ANALYSIS DATA SHEETTENTATIVELY IDENTIFIED COMPOUNDS
Lab Name: CAMBRG
db Code: CAMBRG
EPA SAMPLE NO.
VBLK.081994KContract: MONTGOMERY !___
Case No. : FD1203 SAS No. : SDG No. :
Matrix: (soil/water) WATER
Sample ut/vol: 25.0 (g/mL) ML
Level: (lou/med) LOW
X Moisture: not dec.
GC Column: CAP ID:
Soil Extract Volume:
0. 530 (mm)
(uL)
Number TICs found:
Lab Sample ID: 6305-O81594
Lab File ID: K3756
Date Received:
Date Analyzed: 08/19/94
Dilution Factor: 1.0
Soil Aliquot Volume: (uL)
CONCENTRATION UNITS:(ug/L or ug/Kg) UG/L
1CAS NUMBER ! COMPOUND NAME
================ j ============================1. 541059 ICyclotrisiloxanei hexamethyl2. 556672 ! Cy c lotetrasi loxane* octameth
1
RT========20. 7227. 34
EST. CONC.=============
51
Q=====JJ
FORM I VOA-TIC304933/90