mr2 - ub2012-2 mr on top 5 officials (final)

7/31/2019 Mr2 - Ub2012-2 Mr on Top 5 Officials (Final)

1/13

MEDIARELEASE(June 6, 2012)

FROM: Prof. Ronald D. Holmes

PresidentPulse Asia, Inc.

RE: Pulse Asias May 2012 Nationwide Survey on the

Performance and Trust Ratings of the

Top Five National Government Officials,

Congress and the Supreme Court

Pulse Asia is pleased to share with you some findings on the Performance and

Trust Ratings of the Top Five National Government Officials, Congress and theSupreme Court from the May 2012 Ulat ng Bayan national survey. We request you toassist us in informing the public by disseminating this information.

The survey fieldwork was conducted from May 20 to 26, 2012 using face-to-face

interviews. The following developments preoccupied Filipinos immediately before andduring the conduct of the field interviews for this survey: (1) the resumption of the

impeachment trial of Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato C. Corona on 07 May 2012

and his eventual testimony before the impeachment court on 22 May and May 25 20121;

(2) the continuing tension between the Philippines and China in connection with thedispute over the Scarborough Shoal; (3) the commemoration of Labor Day and

governments rejection of workers call for a P 125 across-the-board pay hike; (4) thegranting of a 30-peso increase in the daily wage of Metro Manila workers; (5) the

announcement of former President Joseph Estradas mayoralty bid in Manila in next

1By the time the senator-judges voted to convict Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona on 29 May

2012, all survey interviews were already completed.


2/13

2

years elections; (6) the resignation of National Economic Development Authority(NEDA) Secretary General Cayetano Paderanga, Jr. for health reasons and the

appointments of University of the Philippines School of Economics Dean Arsenio

Balisacan as acting NEDA Secretary General and retired Ambassador Sonia Brady as thecountrys envoy to China; (7) the passage of the sin tax bill at the House of

Representative and Malacaangs certification of the bill as urgent; (8) the continuingpower crisis in Mindanao; (9) the airport brawl involving media personality Ramon Tulfoand showbiz couple Raymart Santiago and Claudine Barretto and the ensuing exchange

of legal charges between both parties and (10) in the economic front, the increased level

of optimism among local business, failure of the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) to

meet its April 2012 goal, cut in jeepney fares due to oil price rollbacks, possible increasein meat prices due to governments plan to restrict meat importation and the Philippine

Stock Exchanges recording its worst performance of the year.

As in our previous surveys, this nationwide survey is based on a sample of 1,200

representative adults 18 years old and above. It has a 3% error margin at the 95%

confidence level. Subnational estimates for each of the geographic areas covered in thesurvey (i.e., Metro Manila, the rest of Luzon, Visayas and Mindanao) have a 6% error

margin, also at 95% confidence level. Those interested in further technical details

concerning the survey's questionnaire and sampling design may request Pulse Asia inwriting for fuller details, including copies of the pre-tested questions actually used.

Pulse Asias pool of academic fellows takes full responsibility for the design and

conduct of the survey, as well as for analyses it makes based on the survey data. Inkeeping with our academic nature, no religious, political, economic, or partisan group

influenced any of these processes. Pulse Asia undertakes Ulat ng Bayan surveys on itsown without any party singularly commissioning the research effort.

For any clarification or questions, kindly contact Prof. Ronald D. Holmes, Pulse AsiaPresident at 09189335497 or Dr. Ana Maria Tabunda, Pulse Asia Chief Research Fellow

at 09189436816.


3/13

3

Pulse Asias May 2012 Ulat ng Bayan Survey:Media Release on the Performance and Trust Ratings of the

Top Five National Government Officials, Congressand the Supreme Court

06 June 2012

Three out of the countrys top five national government officials obtainmajority approval ratings in May 2012; Filipinos are most appreciative of thework done by Vice-President Jejomar C. Binay (81%)

President Benigno S. Aquino III (67%), Vice-President Binay (81%) and SenatePresident Juan Ponce Enrile (68%) succeed in scoring majority approval ratingsin the latter part of May 2012. On the other hand, most Filipinos are critical of theperformance of Supreme Court Chief Justice Renato C. Corona (60%). As forHouse Speaker Feliciano R. Belmonte, Jr., nearly the same percentages of

Filipinos aware of him either approve of his performance (37%) or expressindecision on the matter (42%). (Please refer to Table 1.)

May 20 - 26, 2012 / Philippines

(Row Percent)

Base: Aware

Top National Officials Aware Approve Undecided Disapprove

BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 100 67 23 10

(President)

JEJOMAR C. BINAY 100 81 15 4

(Vice-President)

JUAN PONCE ENRILE 100 68 25 7

(Senate President)

FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 80 37 42 19

(Speaker of the

House of Representatives)

RENATO C. CORONA 97 12 26 60

(Supreme Court Chief Justice)

Q48-52. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap

nila ng kanilang tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay

TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG

HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME) sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na

ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?

Notes: (1) % Approve = % Truly Approve plus Approve; % Disapprove = Disapprove plus % Truly Disapprove.

(2) Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off or to Don't Know and Refuse responses.

AWARENESS & PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS

Table 1

Across geographic areas and socio-economic groupings, majority approvalratings are enjoyed by President Aquino (57% to 69% and 58% to 71%,respectively), Vice-President Binay (78% to 84% and 79% to 84%, respectively)and Senate President Enrile (61% to 74% and 65% to 73%, respectively). Incontrast, Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona registers majority disapproval


4/13

4

ratings in these survey sub-groupings (56% to 67% and 58% to 65%,respectively). Among Mindanaoans and those in Class E, the plurality sentimenttoward House Speaker Belmontes performance is one of indecision (44% and41%, respectively). However, the House Speaker obtains practically the sameapproval and indecision figures in the other geographic areas (36% to 42% versus

34% to 45%) and socio-economic classes (39% versus 42% to 44%). (Please refer toTable 2.)

Table 2PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS


LOCATION CLASS

BAL

APPROVAL RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

PRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 67 57 69 69 66 58 66 71

VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY 81 84 83 81 78 79 81 84

SEN. PRES. JUAN PONCE ENRILE 68 74 73 61 61 73 68 65

HOUSE SPEAKER FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 37 42 40 36 29 39 39 30

CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA 12 13 13 16 9 9 14 10

UNDECIDED






DISAPPROVAL




HOUSE SPEAKER FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 19 19 13 25 27 16 18 23CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA 60 62 56 59 67 63 58 65

Q48-52. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap

nila ng kanilang tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay

TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG

HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME) sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na

ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)

The performance ratings of these top officials of the Philippine nationalgovernment both at the national level and across geographic areas and socio-economic groupings remain generally unchanged between March and May2012. The double-digit decline in the approval ratings of President Aquino (-11

percentage points) and House Speaker Belmonte (-12 percentage points) in MetroManila as well as the double-digit increase in the level of indecision towardpresidential performance recorded among Metro Manilans (+10 percentagepoints) fall short of being significant in light of the +/- 6 percentage points errormargin in the different geographic areas. (Please refer to Table 3.)


5/13

5

Table 3

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALSMarch and May 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BALAPPROVAL RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E

PRES. BENIGNO S. AQUINO III May 12 67 57 69 69 66 58 66 71

Mar 12 70 68 69 76 68 52 71 72

VICE-PRES. JEJOMAR C. BINAY May 12 81 84 83 81 78 79 81 84

Mar 12 84 85 85 78 86 72 86 82

SEN. PRES. JUAN PONCE ENRILE May 12 68 74 73 61 61 73 68 65

Mar 12 71 82 72 69 66 65 71 73

HOUSE SPEAKER FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. May 12 37 42 40 36 29 39 39 30

Mar 12 41 54 43 37 34 38 44 37

CHIEF JUSTICE RENATO C. CORONA May 12 12 13 13 16 9 9 14 10

Mar 12 14 11 13 19 16 10 16 13

UNDECIDED


Mar 12 21 21 22 18 21 35 20 19


Mar 12 13 11 12 17 11 23 12 13


Mar 12 21 13 21 22 25 26 21 20


Mar 12 41 35 42 38 43 43 38 45


Mar 12 26 27 27 28 24 24 26 27

DISAPPROVAL


Mar 12 9 11 9 6 12 13 9 9


Mar 12 3 4 3 4 3 4 3 5


Mar 12 7 5 7 8 8 8 7 7


Mar 12 16 10 14 23 21 14 16 17


Mar 12 58 61 59 52 60 64 57 59

Q. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng ilang mga opisyal ng ating pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang

tungkulin nitong huling tatlong buwan. Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO,

APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO kay (NAME)

sa kanyang pagganap bilang (POSITION) o wala pa kayong nabasa o narinig na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanya kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)


6/13

6

Most Filipinos express trust in three of the countrys leading nationalgovernment officials; the highest trust rating is obtained by Vice-PresidentBinay (78%)

In May 2012, majority national trust ratings are obtained by President Aquino

(65%), Vice-President Binay (78%) and Senate President Enrile (62%). Themajority sentiment toward Supreme Court Chief Justice Coronastrustworthiness is one of distrust (65%) while half of those aware of HouseSpeaker Belmonte cannot say if they trust or distrust him (50%). There are nosignificant changes in the overall trust ratings of the countrys top five nationalgovernment officials during the period March to May 2012. (Please refer to Table4.)

Table 4

AWARENESS & TRUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALSMay 20 - 26, 2012 / Philippines

(Row Percent)

Base: Aware

Big Small /

Top National Officials Aware Trust Undecided No trust

BENIGNO S. AQUINO III 100 65 25 10

(President)

JEJOMAR C. BINAY 100 78 18 4

(Vice-President)

JUAN PONCE ENRILE 100 62 30 8

(Senate President)

FELICIANO R. BELMONTE, JR. 80 29 50 20

(Speaker of theHouse of Representatives)

RENATO C. CORONA 97 10 24 65

(Supreme Court Chief Justice)

Q95-99. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), maaari bang pakisabi ninyo kung gaano kalaki o kaliit ang inyong pagtitiwala

kay/sa [PERSONALITY/INSTITUTION]? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING

MALIIT, MALIIT, o MALIIT NA MALIIT/WALA?

Notes: (1) % Big Trust = % Very Big Trust plus % Big Trust ; % Small Trust = % Small Trust plus Very Small Trust

(2) *Figures may not add up to 100% due to rounding off.

Majority trust ratings are registered by President Aquino (59% to 68% and 57% to66%, respectively), Vice-President Binay (75% to 80% and 66% to 79%,

respectively) and Senate President Enrile (54% to 70% and 60% to 76%,respectively) across geographic areas and socio-economic groupings. On theother hand, majority distrust ratings are posted by Supreme Court Chief JusticeCorona in these survey sub-groupings (61% to 75% and 63% to 72%,respectively). In the case of House Speaker Belmonte, big pluralities to smallmajorities in all socio-economic classes (43% to 53%) and virtually everygeographic area (42% to 57%) are ambivalent on the matter of trusting or


7/13

7

distrusting him. Metro Manila is an exception since House Speaker Belmontescores basically the same trust and indecision ratings in this particulargeographic area (40% versus 42%). (Please refer to Table 5.)

Table 5TRUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS


LOCATION CLASS

BAL

TRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E






UNDECIDED






DISTRUST






Q95-99. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.






(In Percent)

Between March and May 2012, Filipinos assessment of the trustworthiness of thecountrys top national officials remains generally constant across geographicareas and socio-economic glasses. The only exception is the 14-percentage pointincrease in the distrust rating of Supreme Court Chief Justice Corona inMindanao. (Please refer to Table 6.)


8/13

8

Table 6COMPARATIVE TRUST RATINGS OF TOP NATIONAL OFFICIALS

March and May 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BALTRUST RP NCR LUZ VIS MIN ABC D E


Mar 12 69 67 67 73 71 60 68 72


Mar 12 80 85 79 78 82 78 80 80


Mar 12 63 76 63 62 58 60 64 62


Mar 12 32 42 34 27 25 28 33 30


Mar 12 11 9 11 10 11 7 11 11

UNDECIDED


Mar 12 23 24 26 19 19 28 24 19


Mar 12 15 11 17 16 13 18 16 14


Mar 12 29 18 31 30 33 31 29 30


Mar 12 48 43 49 48 49 50 48 49


Mar 12 29 27 30 31 28 29 29 30

DISTRUST


Mar 12 8 9 7 8 10 12 8 8


Mar 12 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 6


Mar 12 7 6 6 8 9 9 6 8


Mar 12 19 15 16 24 24 18 18 21


Mar 12 60 64 59 59 61 64 60 59

Q. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO AT INSTITUSYON SA ATING LIPUNAN.






(In Percent)


9/13

9

The Senate, House of Representatives and Supreme Court register almost thesame performance ratings in May 2012; near majorities of Filipinos (44% to48%) are appreciative of the work done by these government institutions

Almost the same percentages of Filipinos express approval for the performance

of the Senate (48%), House of Representative (45%) and Supreme Court (44%).Likewise, these government institutions record practically the same disapprovalscores (14% to 19%) and indecision ratings (35% to 39%). These figures do notdiffer in any significant way from the performance ratings they obtained inMarch 2012. (Please refer to Table 7.)

Table 7PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTMay 20 - 26, 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL


SENATE 48 47 47 53 45 36 48 50

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 45 41 43 52 45 38 44 49

SUPREME COURT 44 39 41 50 47 36 45 43

UNDECIDED

SENATE 37 41 40 26 40 49 38 34


SUPREME COURT 35 32 39 32 32 44 36 33

DISAPPROVAL

SENATE 14 11 11 20 14 14 13 15


SUPREME COURT 19 28 17 18 21 15 19 21

Q33-35. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng mga ahensiya o opisina ng pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang tungkulin.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING

HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO sa kanilang pagganap sa mga tungkulin ng (AHENSIYA/ OPISINA) o wala pa

kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanila kahit na kailan?

Notes: (1) % Approve = % Truly Approve plus % Approve; % Disapprove = % Disapprove plus % Truly Disapprove.


(In Percent)

The Senate and House of Representatives post generally the same approval andindecision ratings in Metro Manila (47% versus 41% and 47% versus 40%,respectively), the rest of Luzon (47% versus 40% and 43% versus 42%,respectively) and Mindanao (45% versus 40% and 45% versus 39%, respectively).Among Visayans, appreciation is the majority sentiment toward these legislativechambers performance (53% and 52%, respectively). However, in Class ABC,near to small majorities are ambivalent as regards the work done by the Senate


10/13

10

and House of Representatives (49% and 51%, respectively). Meanwhile, nearmajorities of those in Classes D and E approve of the Senates work (48% and50%, respectively). In the case of the Lower House, it scores a near majorityapproval rating (49%) in Class E but almost the same percentages of those inClass D either appreciate its performance or are ambivalent about it (44% versus

40%). (Please refer to Table 7.)

As for the Supreme Courts performance, Metro Manilans are split about thematter with 39% expressing approval, 32% being undecided about the matterand 28% criticizing it. The Supreme Court posts almost the same approval andindecision ratings in the rest of Luzon (41% versus 39%) and all socio-economicclasses (36% to 45% versus 33% versus 44%). In the Visayas and Mindanao,approval is the plurality sentiment toward the Supreme Courts work (50% and47%, respectively). (Please refer to Table 7.)

Across geographic areas and socio-economic classes, the performance ratings ofCongress and the Supreme Court remain generally unchanged between Marchand May 2012. The only marked movement during this period occurs in theVisayas a decline in the level of indecision toward the performance of theSenate (-14 percentage points). Slight changes in the Senates approval rating inMindanao (-11 percentage points) and its disapproval rating in the Visayas (+12percentage points) may also be noted. Meanwhile, ambivalence toward the workdone by the Lower House eases somewhat in the Visayas (-11 percentage points).(Please refer to Table 8.)


11/13

11

Table 8

COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTMarch and May 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASSBAL


SENATE May 12 48 47 47 53 45 36 48 50

Mar 12 50 47 47 52 56 44 50 50

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 12 45 41 43 52 45 38 44 49

Mar 12 43 42 40 47 47 38 45 40

SUPREME COURT May 12 44 39 41 50 47 36 45 43

Mar 12 41 34 36 48 45 34 40 43

UNDECIDED

SENATE May 12 37 41 40 26 40 49 38 34

Mar 12 37 36 39 40 31 42 36 38


Mar 12 40 37 42 42 36 43 39 42


Mar 12 35 35 36 33 36 42 34 37

DISAPPROVAL

SENATE May 12 14 11 11 20 14 14 13 15

Mar 12 13 17 14 8 14 13 14 12


Mar 12 16 20 18 10 17 19 16 17


Mar 12 24 31 27 19 18 23 26 20

Q. Mayroon ako ritong mga pangalan ng mga ahensiya o opisina ng pamahalaan. Pakisabi ninyo ang inyong opinyon tungkol sa pagganap nila ng kanilang tungkulin.

Sa pamamagitan po ng board na ito (SHOW RATING BOARD), kayo ba ay TALAGANG APROBADO, APROBADO, MAAARING APROBADO AT MAAARING

HINDI APROBADO, HINDI APROBADO, o TALAGANG HINDI APROBADO sa kanilang pagganap sa mga tungkulin ng (AHENSIYA/ OPISINA) o wala pa

kayong nabasa, narinig o napanood na kahit na ano tungkol sa kanila kahit na kailan?



(In Percent)

The Senate, House of Representatives and Supreme Court record essentiallythe same trust (41% to 44%) and indecision (41% to 47%) ratings in May 2012

While 41% to 44% of Filipinos express trust in Congress and the Supreme Court,41% to 47% cannot say if they trust or distrust these government institutions. Onthe other hand, 10% to 18% of Filipinos distrust Congress and the SupremeCourt. No significant changes in the overall trust ratings of these entities may beobserved between March and May 2012. Even the decline in the Senates overalltrust rating (-6 percentage points) and the corresponding increase in the level ofambivalence toward its trustworthiness (+6 percentage points) still fall within thesurveys overall error margin of +/- 3 percentage points. (Please refer to Table 9.)


12/13

12

Table 9TRUST RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTMay 20 - 26, 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL


SENATE 44 43 41 50 43 34 43 48


SUPREME COURT 41 33 41 48 40 25 42 43

UNDECIDED

SENATE 46 47 51 36 46 58 47 41


SUPREME COURT 41 47 43 32 41 59 40 40

DISTRUST

SENATE 10 10 7 14 12 7 9 11HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 11 15 9 15 11 14 11 11

SUPREME COURT 18 20 16 20 19 16 18 17

Q118-120. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO, AHENSIYA AT GRUPO SA ATING LIPUNAN.


kay/sa [PERSONALITY/AGENCY/GROUP]? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING




(In Percent)

Visayans grant the Senate and House of Representatives near majority trustratings (49% and 50%, respectively). In contrast, majorities in the rest of Luzon(51%) and Class ABC (58% to 60%) express indecision as regards the

trustworthiness of these lawmaking bodies. Practically the same trust andindecision ratings are obtained by the Senate and House of Representatives inMindanao (43% versus 46% and 42% versus 47%, respectively), Class D (43%versus 47% and 40% versus 48%, respectively) and Class E (both at 48% versus41%). Among Metro Manilans, the majority sentiment toward the House ofRepresentatives is one of indecision (51%) while in the case of the Senate, nearlythe same percentages either trust the institution (43%) or are ambivalent about itstrustworthiness (47%). (Please refer to Table 9.)

Meanwhile, near to small majorities of those in Metro Manila and Class ABC(47% and 59%, respectively) are unable to say whether they trust or distrust theSupreme Court while a near majority of Visayans (48%) expresses trust towardthe institution. Around the same percentages of those in the rest of Luzon (41%versus 43%), Mindanao (40% versus 41%), Class D (42% versus 40%) and Class E(43% versus 40%) either trust the Supreme Court or are undecided as regards itstrustworthiness. (Please refer to Table 9.)


13/13

13

There are hardly any significant movements in the trust ratings of these threeinstitutions across geographic areas and socio-economic classes between Marchand May 2012. The only significant change during this period is the increase inthe level of trust in the House of Representatives recorded in the poorest Class E(+15 percentage points). (Please refer to Table 10.)

Table 10

COMPARATIVE TRUST RATINGS OF THE SENATE,

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AND SUPREME COURTMarch and May 2012 / Philippines

LOCATION CLASS

BAL


SENATE May 12 44 43 41 50 43 34 43 48

Mar 12 50 53 48 50 52 43 52 47HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES May 12 41 34 39 49 42 26 40 48

Mar 12 41 44 38 42 43 38 45 33


Mar 12 37 38 31 48 37 34 38 35

UNDECIDED

SENATE May 12 46 47 51 36 46 58 47 41

Mar 12 40 38 44 38 35 41 39 42


Mar 12 47 43 52 44 41 52 44 52


Mar 12 42 41 45 34 45 46 39 48

DISTRUST

SENATE May 12 10 10 7 14 12 7 9 11

Mar 12 10 9 8 12 13 15 9 11


Mar 12 12 13 10 13 15 10 11 14


Mar 12 21 21 24 18 18 20 23 17

Q. NAIS SANA NAMING TANUNGIN KAYO TUNGKOL SA PAGTITIWALA NINYO SA ILANG MGA TAO, AHENSIYA AT GRUPO SA ATING LIPUNAN.


kay/sa [PERSONALITY/AGENCY/GROUP]? Masasabi ba ninyo na ito ay MALAKING-MALAKI, MALAKI, MAAARING MALAKI AT MAAARING




(In Percent)

mr2 - ub2012-2 mr on top 5 officials (final)

Documents