mr. a. square unbound continuum states in 1-d quantum mechanics
TRANSCRIPT
Mr. A. Square Unbound
Continuum States in 1-D Quantum Mechanics
With Apologies to Shelley
In the previous section, we assumedThat a particle exists in a 1-d spaceThat it experiences a real potential, V(x)That its wavefunction is a solution of the
TISE or TDSEThat at infinity, its wavefunction is zero.
In this section, those are removed
The consequences
If the boundary condition at infinity is removed,Then a quantum system is not limited to a
discrete set of states butA continuum of energies is allowed.
Normalizing Infinity
One problem if (x)∞, how do you normalize it?
Well, Postulate 7 (wherein we discuss normalization) is based on the proviso that it mainly applies to bound states.
Mathematically, if we have to find a matrix element, we perform the following operation:
a x ax
a a
The Free Particle
2 2
2 2
2
2 2
22
2
22
22
2
If V(x)=0 then the TDSE reduces to
( , ) ( , )-
2m i
( , ) ( )
Now the TISE:
2
2where
0 's solution is sinusoidal so
( ) ( )
iEt
ikx ikx
x t x t
x t
x t x e
mE
x
kx
mEk
kx
A k e B k e
( , ) ( )
( , ) ( ) ( )
where
iEt
i kx t i kx t
x t x e
x t A k e B k e
E
Assume k>0 & real, and B(k)=0, then describes a wave moving from –x to +x
*
*
*
*
* *
* *
What about p ?
p dxa p a
pa a
dx
dxi x
p
dx
k dx dx
p k
dx dx
p k
Obviously, <p2>=2k2
So p=<p2>-<p>2 =0
There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum
This is in agreement with Newton’s 1st Law
Assume k<0 & real, and A(k)=0, then describes a wave moving from +x to -x
*
*
*
*
* *
* *
What about p ?
p dxa p a
pa a
dx
dxi x
p
dx
k dx dx
p k
dx dx
p k
Obviously, <p2>=2k2
So p=<p2>-<p>2 =0
There is no variance in momentum, thus the free particle has mixed momentum
This is in agreement with Newton’s 1st Law
Obviously
eikx represents a particle moving from right to left
e-ikx represents a particle moving from left to right
The Wave Packet as a solution
Another solution to the TDSE is a “wave packet”
As an example, let B(k)=0 and the solution is in the form of the integral:
Note that this is the inverse Fourier transform
A complication arises in that is not really independent of k
( )( , ) ( ) i kx tx t A k e dk
The Wave Packet cont’d
Typically, the form of A(k) is chosen to be a Gaussian
We also assume that (k) can be expanded in a Taylor series about a specific value of k
0 0
22
0 0 0 2
1( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2k k
k k k k k kk k
The Wave Packet cont’d
The packet consists of “ripples” contained within an “envelope”
“the phase velocity” is the velocity of the ripples “the group velocity” is the velocity of the envelope In the earlier expansion, the group velocity is d/dk
The phase velocity
2
2 2 2 2 222
22 2 2 2 2
2
2
22
2
2
2 2
2 2
1Classically, E=
22
4 42
2
phase
phase
c
c phase
c phase
d x x tvdt t k k
x
EE
vmE m
mv
E Ev v
m mv v
So the ripple travels at ½ the speed of the particle
Also, note if <p2>=2k2
then I can find a “quantum velocity”= <p2> /m2
2k2/m2= E/2m=vq
So vq is the phase velocity or the quantum mechanical wave function travels at the phase speed
The Group Velocity
22
2
2 22 2
2
2 2
2
2
2
group
group c
mE mk
k
mk
d dkm
d kv
dk m
k Ev v
m m
The group velocity (the velocity of the envelope) is velocity of the particle and is twice the ripple velocity.
BTW the formula for in terms of k is called the dispersion relation
The Step Potential
Region 2
x=0
V(x)=V0
Region 1
0 x>0( )
0 x<0
VV x
Region 1
1 1
221
1 1 12 2
1
2
Soik x ik x
mEk
x
Ae Be
“A” is the amplitude of the incident wave “B” is the amplitude of the reflected wave
Region 2
2
20 22
2 2 22 2
1
2
Soik x
m E Vk
x
Ce
“C” is the amplitude of the transmitted wave
Matching Boundary Conditions
1 2
1 2 1 1 2
Condition 1: (0) (0)
Condition 2: '(0) '(0)
A B C
ik A ik B ik C
The problem is that we have 2 equations and 3 unknowns.
“A” is controlled by the experimenter so we will always solve ALL equations in terms of the amplitude of the incident wave
Applying some algebra
1 1 2 1 1 2
1 1 2
1 2 1 2
1 2
1 2
1 2 1 2 1
1 2 1 2 1 2
1
1
21
B CA B C
A AB C
ik A ik B ik C k k kA A
B Bk k k
A A
Bk k k k
Ak kB
A k k
k k k k kC B
A A k k k k k k
If E>V0 then E-V0>0 or “+” Then k2 is real and 2 is
an oscillator propagation
If E<V0 Classically, the particle
is repelled In QM, k2 is imaginary
and 2 describes an attenuating wave
Graphically
If E>V0 then E-V0>0 or “+” Then k2 is real and 2 is
an oscillator propagation
If E<V0 Classically, the particle
is repelled In QM, k2 is imaginary
and 2 describes an attenuating wave
Region 2
x=0
V(x)=V0
Region 1
Region 2
x=0
V(x)=V0
Region 1
Reflection and Transmission Coefficients
2
**
21
21
2 2Im( )22
Recall
2
Define 3 currents, , ,
Re( )
Define
A B C
A
B
k xC
CB
A A
Jmi x x
J J J
kJ A
mk
J Bmk
J C k em
JJR T
J J
If k2 is
imaginary, T=0 If k2 is real, then
2
2
1
k CT
k A
2
22
1 2
1 2
22Im( )2
1
Re( )
B
A
k xC
A
J k kBR
J A k k
J k CT e
J k A
In terms of Energy,
If E>V0 then
12
0 01 22 21
21 2
0 0
4 14
1
E EV Vk k
Tk k
E EV V
If E<V0 then R=1 and T=0
The Step Potential
Region 2
x=0
V(x)=V0
Region 1
0
0 x<0
( ) 0<x<a
0 x>a
V x V
x=a
Region 3
The Wave Function
0 0
0
20 2
022
2
2
ik x ik x
ikx ikx
ik x
mEe Re kAe Be
m E VkTe
Boundary Conditions
1 2 2 3
1 2 2 3
) (0) (0) ) ( ) ( )
) '(0) '(0) ) '( ) '( )
a b a a
c d a a
Apply Boundary Conditions
0
0
0
0
) 1
)
) 1
)
ik a ika ika
ik a ika ika
a R A B
b Te Ae Be
c ik R ik A B
d ik Te ik Ae Be
Solving
0
0
2
2 2
2 2
Let 1
1 sin 2
1 sin 2 cos 1 sin 2 cos
1 1
1 sin 2 cos 1 sin 2 cos
ika
ika ika
Vk
k E
ka iR T e
ka i ka ka i ka
i iA e B e
ka i ka ka i ka
Reflection and Transmission Coefficients
22 22
2 22 2 2
22
2 22 2 2
1 sin
1 sin 2 cos
2
1 sin 2 cos
kaR
ka ka
Tka ka
Some Consequences
22 22
2 22 2 2
22
2 22 2 2
1 sin
1 sin 2 cos
2
1 sin 2 cos
kaR
ka ka
Tka ka
When ka=n*, n=integer, implies T=1 and R=0
This happens because there are 2 edges where reflection occur and these components can add destructively
Called “Ramsauer-Townsend” effect
For E<V0
22
2 22 2 2
2
1 sinh 2 coshT
ka ka
Classically, the particle must always be reflected
QM says that there is a nonvanishing T
In region 2, k is imaginarySince
cos(iz)=cosh(z) sin(iz)=isinh(z)
Since cosh2z-sinh2z=1
T cannot be unity so there is no Ramsauer-Townsend effect
What happens if the barrier height is high and the length is long?
Consequence: T is very small; barrier is nearly opaque.
What if V0<0? Then the problem reduces to the finite boxPoles (or infinities) in T correspond to
discrete states
An Alternate Method
We could have skipped over the Mr. A Square Bound and gone straight to Mr. A Square Unbound. We would identify poles in the scattering amplitude as bound states.
This approach is difficult to carry out in practice
The Dirac Delta Potential
The delta barrier can either be treated as a bound state problem or considered as a scattering problem.
The potential is given by V(x)=-(x-x0)
x=x0
Region 1 Region 2
Wavefunctions and Boundary Conditions
1
2
1 2
1 2
(0) (0)
'(0) '(0)
ikx ikx
ikx
Ae Be
Ce
From the previous lecture, the discontinuity at the singularity is given by:
02
2' ( )
mx
Applying the boundary conditions
0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0
2
22 2 4
2 2 4 2 2
2 2 22
2 2 4 2 2
2( )
Elimination of is straight forward and
C C
A A
B B
A A
ikx ikx ikx
ikx ikx ikx ikx
ikx
Ae Be Ce
mikCe ikAe ikBe Ce
B
ik kT
ik m k m
m me R
ik m k m
R cannot vanish or only vanishes if k is very large so there is always some reflection
Solving for k and E
0
22
2 2
22
2 2 22
4 2 2
C B
A ABoth of these quantities become infinite if
the divisor goes to zero
0
2
2
ikxik me
ik m ik m
mik m k
i
m mE mk E
This is in agreement with the result of the previous section. If is negative, then the spike is repulsive and there are
no bound states
A Matrix Approach to Scattering
Consider a general, localized scattering problem
Region 1
V(x)
Region 2 Region 3
Wavefunctions
22
22
2Region 1 ( ) ( )
2Region 3 ( ) ( )
Region 2 ( ) ( ) ( )
where f(x) and g(x) are two linearly independent
functions which depend on the potential.
ikx ikx
ikx ikx
mEx Ae Be k
mEx Fe Ge k
x C f x D g x
Boundary Conditions
There are four boundary conditions in this problem and we can use them to solve for “B” and “F” in terms of “A” and “G”.
B=S11A+S12G F=S21A+S22GSij are the various coefficients which
depend on k. They seem to form a 2 x 2 matrix
Called the scattering matrix (s-matrix for short)
11 12
21 22
S S
S S
S
Consequences
The case of scattering from the left, G=0 so RL=|S11|2 and TL=|S21|2
The case of scattering from the right, F=0 so RR=|S22|2 and TR=|S12|2
The S-matrix tells you everything that you need to know about scattering from a localized potential.
It also contains information about the bound states If you have the S-matrix and you want to locate
bound states, let ki and look for the energies where the S-matrix blows up.