moxie - spring 2011

MOXIET H E C A L I F O R N I A C O L L E G E R E P U B L I C A N S P R E S E N T S

The Republican Recovery

LookingBack and Ahead

Reagan and theRebirth of a Nation

Public EmployeeUnions vs. Taxpayers

3 | Moxie Spring 2011

Michael Antonopoulos (St. Mary’s College) Chairman

Chasen Bullock (CSU San Marcos) Co-Chair

Clinton Soffer (UC San Diego) Administrative Vice-Chair

Izaak Pichardo (UC Davis) Treasurer

Rick Chen (UC Berkeley) Secretary

Megan Rodriguez (UC San Diego) Executive Director

Ryan Fedrizzi (CSU Chico) Northern Vice-Chair

Justine Speegle (University of the Pacific) Capitol Vice-Chair

Nithin Mathew (SJSU) Bay Area Vice-Chair

Landon Wolf (CSU Monterey Bay) Central Coast Vice-Chair

Cole Rojewski (CSU Fresno) Central Valley Vice-Chair

Alexa Ekman (USC) Los Angeles Vice-Chair

Matt Crimi (SDSU) Southern Vice-Chair

Tierney Burke (UC Davis) Political Director

Amit Batish (UC Davis) Chief of Staff

Taryn Dicterow (USC) Communications Director

Mark Laluan (CSU East Bay) Operations Director

Damien McDowell (El Camino College) Activism Coordinator

Kaitlyn Shimmin (UC Santa Cruz) Parliamentarian

Cheyenne Steel (USC) Immediate Past Chair

Moxie is the official publication of the California College Republicans. The views in Moxie do not necessarily represent those of our membership, Executive Committee, Board of Directors or committees thereof. All ads placed in Moxie are sold according to the prices and regulations set forth in our official advertising prospectus. This prospectus is available upon request.

Megan Rodriguez (UC San Diego) Editor in Chief

Taryn Dicterow (USC) Deputy Editor

Chelsey Mullins (USD) Layout and Design

Caroline Wren Cover and Design

Paul Khoury (CSU Los Angeles) Photography

CCR Executive Committee

Moxie Staff


Contents 3 | Editor’s Note Megan Rodriguez

7 | Chairman’s Corner Michael Antonopoulos

8 | Looking Back and Ahead Chris Telfer

10 | Reagan and the Rebirth of a Nation Andrew Murcia

12 | Old Ideas, New Perspectives Zac Gates

14 | Flashpoint: Public Employee Unions v. Taxpayers Clinton Soffer

18 | Governor Brown’s Tax-Hikes Avoid the Fundamental Problem in California Andy Nevis

20 | America’s Presence in Egypt’s Transition towards Democracy Bianka Asik

22 | Chapter Evolution: The Natural Progression of the CR Chapter Nithin Mathew

23 | Chapter Update: UC Berkeley College Republicans Shawn Lewis

24 | Running for School Board Trustee Francisco Diaz

26 | Being Red in a Blue State Joanna Diaz

27 | Counter Protest Sammy Levine

28 | Creating and Communicating a College Republican Presence on Campus Taryn Dicterow

NUMBERSRepublicans in the U.S.

House of Representatives

241Republicans in the U.S.

Senate

47Republicans in the

California State Assembly

27Republicans in the

California State Senate

15



California College Republicans

Convention 2011

The Davis College Republicans invite

you to attend the 2011 CCR Statewide

Convention in Sacramento

For more information please contact

Convention Director Tierney Burke at

[email protected]

Join us April 29th to May 1st

Embassy Suites Sacramento

100 Capitol Mall

Sacramento, CA 95814

Throughout 2010, the California College Republicans worked tirelessly to elect Republicans to state, federal, and local offices. Waving signs at campaign rallies, walking precincts, making phone calls, and bracketing Democrats were just some of the many ways that College Republicans volunteered for the California Republican ticket.

With the election behind us and the next campaign season still a year away, now is the time for College Republicans to dedicate their considerable talents and energy into growing the membership of their chapters. Without an election to spark the interest of otherwise politically non-engaged students on campus this can be a very difficult task.

The key to successful recruitment of new members is recognizing that everyone has a different reason for joining CRs. There are those who strive to be the next Karl Rove, viewing College Republicans as their first step in a long political career. There are activists, who spend every waking moment brainstorming on how to best irritate liberals on campus. Of course there are also the social CRs, who enjoy networking with conservative minded students, yet would not be caught dead at a protest or precinct walk.

A successful club will attract and welcome students with varying interests and motivation for joining CRs. The most effective way to grow your chapter is to make it clear to all potential members that there is no “typical” CR. Work with your club’s executive board to ensure that when you are tabling, your members are marketing all activities of College Republicans, from volunteering to partying. While College Republicans can be (and often is) a starting point for a political career, it does not have to be any more than a place for like-minded students to gather, share their beliefs, and network. There is no wrong reason to join College Republicans, and there is no such thing as being too active or not active enough. CRs are and will continue to be a big tent.

The California College Republicans have been a major part of my life for the last five years, and it has been an honor to serve as Chairman. As I move on with my work in the Republican Party, I can truly attest that you will get out of CRs what you put into it. I have made my best friends in College Republicans, and many of my fondest memories in college were with College Republicans. Your experience will be what you make of it, so get involved, stand up, and make yourself heard!

Cheers,

Michael AntonopoulosChairmanCalifornia College Republicans


MICHAEL ANTONOPOULOS

Saint Mary’s College

Chairman’s Corner

Looking Back and AheadThe American electorate sent President Obama and his far-left buddies a very strong message on November 2nd- “No, you can’t!” After enacting some of the most liberal, pro-big government pieces of legislation this country has seen since FDR, Obama and the Democratic Party suffered what was described by Obama himself as a “shellacking.” To most people even remotely familiar with American elections and the history thereof, President Obama’s description may seem like somewhat of an understatement.

Let’s take a quick look at this “shellacking.” After just two short years removed from having comparisons drawn to the Whig Party and its demise of 1856, the GOP gained 63 seats in the House of Representatives, 6 seats in the Senate, 675 state legislative seats, and 5 governorships. Additionally, Republicans now hold a very significant role in the redrawing of the boundaries of an appalling 314 congressional districts, a fact that wil l benefit the GOP tremendously in 2012.

Rejuvenated by an energized voter base and led by some new faces, the Republican Party made gains in the House that were nearly unprecedented. Only the

election of 1948 yielded a power s h i f t o f t h i s magnitude when the Democrats gained 75 seats in t h e H o u s e o f Representatives.

Frustrated by the s l o w p a c e o f economic recovery and the state of our country, voters wanted a change of

direction. The lack of fiscal responsibility t h a t o u r f e d e r a l g o v e r n m e n t h a d displayed in a time of economic recession was something that voters could no longer tolerate. The $787 b i l l i o n “ s t i m u l u s ” package did absolutely nothing to quell the r i s i n g l e v e l o f unemployment, with the unemployment rate actually increasing since the spending bill was passed. It was successful, however, in stimulating the federal debt, which Obama and his Democratic Congress increased nearly $3 trillion in only 21 months. After Obama ran disingenuously in 2008 on fixing out of control government spending, voters grew disenchanted with what many called, “Obamanomics,”

Democrats then passed the “Affordable Health Care for America Act,” more commonly known as “Obamacare.” This bill claims to reduce the federal deficit, reduce the cost of health care, and also improve the quality of health care. Seriously, when has the vast expansion of an entitlement program (Medicaid, in this case) ever reduced the deficit? Or have you ever heard of the government providing a better quality product than the private sector? Me neither. More than 60% of Americans opposed this government take-over of one-sixth of the economy, and for good reason.

These two pieces of legislation have really defined the Obama presidency’s first two years. Unfortunately, the desire that he and the Democrats had to grow the size of government did not stop there. The passage of a financial regulation bill and the failed attempt to pass the infamous “Cap and Trade” bill are just two


Poll ResultsRasmussen Reports

Percentage of people that believe that the health care bill should be repealed and

replaced.

Approve 61%

Oppose 28%

Not Sure 11%

CHRIS TELFER

College of the Sequoias

more of the countless number of examples of an over-reaching government agenda.

Although the GOP made tremendous gains in 2010, many political pundits saw the results as a referendum on the policies of Obama and the two past years of Democratic control, not necessarily an endorsement of the Republican Party. Newly elected Florida Senator Marco Rubio, a rising star of the party, said it best during his acceptance speech, “We make a great mistake if we see these results are somehow an embrace of the Republican Party. What they are is a second chance; a second chance to be what they said they are going to be not so long ago…” He is right. The results of this election, and the time leading up to November 2012, is a very small window of opportunity to prove to Americans that the Republican Party will provide pro-business economic policies that will help create private sector jobs and reduce the regulatory burden that businesses have to face in doing so. The reduction of the size and scope of the federal government will be integral to the success of the party in 2012.

With the likes of Sen. Rubio, Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey, Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana, Rep. Paul Ryan of Wisconsin and many other very ambitious GOP leaders, the chances of accomplishing this are very good.

The goals are very clear and concise: dramatically cut spending, create jobs, repeal job-destroying Obamacare, and then replace it with a patient-centered health care reform bill that reduces the cost of health care while making it more accessible. These are daunting tasks

considering that the Senate and White House are still controlled by Democrats, but the desire of the American people was stated very clearly last November: a change of course is needed.

If Republicans can rein in spending and return to the values that made our nation the greatest this world has ever seen, there won’t be any telling how successful we will be in 2012. If College Republicans in California and across the nation work tirelessly to ensure that our generation does not succumb to the empty message of “hope and change” once again, and build off of the momentum that was established last November, that success seems inevitable. The citizens of America want to see our government return to the way it is supposed to be: limited in its power, fiscally responsible, and out of the way of the private sector. Let’s make sure that happens.


The American electorate sent President Obama and his far-left buddies a very strong message on November 2nd: “No, you can’t!”

Reagan and the Rebirth of a NationA Tribute to the President Who Restored America�’s Promise.

On the occasion of Ronald Reagan�’s centennial, there is no shortage of voices to praise our late 40thPresident. All I can do is add my own to the chorus.

To catalogue the events of Reagan�’s life is work better left to a biographer. Instead, let me offer a testimonialto the greatness of the man who is the newest inductee into the pantheon of American heroes, the man whobrought modern Conservatism into maturity, the man who oversaw the rebirth of these United States andthe restoration of America�’s promise.

Reagan once said, �“I know in my heart that man is good. That what is rightwill always eventually triumph. And there�’s purpose and worth to each andevery life.�” Such an abiding faith in the human spirit, in the fundamentaldecency of mankind, and in the incomparable worth of every human lifemade Reagan a man well suited to take on the problems our nation faced inthe 1980s.

In a world fundamentally divided between liberty and totalitarianism,capitalism and communism, individualism and collectivism, he understoodthe Soviet threat and met it head on, delivering the final blow to an alreadydying �“evil empire.�”

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

!"##$ %&'(!)"$ *'+ #',-&),.(/ ".)

(!".0 $12 31' !".)&.4 *$ 4,.,'"(&1.

". "*,'&5" 61'(! (!, 3&4!(7

“Freedom is never more than one generation

away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in

the bloodstream. It must be fought

for, protected, and handed on for them to do

the same.”

When I took my first step onto the campus of the University of California at Santa B a r b a r a , I w a s b e a m i n g w i t h c o n fi d e n c e . I graduated high school thinking I knew it all. With big expectations and an even bigger

ego, I saw the university as a mere platform to provoke those who disagreed with me politically. I did this through senseless pugnacity and a complete lack of respect—not only for other views, but for my own as well.

I took what I heard at face value. I found myself memorizing empty data for no good reason, other than the sake of argument. Facts were arrows in my quiver, always fletched, always ready, and always disposable. I would state a random point in a discussion and then I would forget it the next day. I was a train on the move, but I often derailed during my early college years. I became a rambling juggernaut, a screaming, smoking locomotive that only stopped to pick up passengers once in a while. But then one word changed my life forever. That word is “why.”

Why do I believe what I believe? Why do I think my beliefs are correct? Why do I think my opponents’ beliefs are incorrect? Why do I think my beliefs benefit more people than other beliefs? Why?

I never stopped asking the question. And then something started happening to me, a revelation of

the mind: I started learning. I began to understand my beliefs instead of simply reciting them.

I thought I was a hot shot in my early years at UCSB. I thought my journey through college was going to be a cakewalk. And then I was humbled. I realized that I honestly did not know why I considered myself “right-wing.” Somebody asked me one day why I wasn’t a liberal. I had the basic talking points covered, but it was unsatisfying because there wasn’t any substance to my answer. The empty words I was throwing at this person reflected a personal ignorance, and they certainly were not thought provoking.

So I retreated into the depths of my mind and began asking that beautiful word “why.” After reading a few books by Dr. Thomas Sowell, I discovered that the answers to my questions did not necessarily have to be complicated or wordy. Dr. Sowell demonstrated that simple sentences could carry great wisdom. But I had to learn how to craft a coherent thought process that I could understand, and more importantly, that those around me could understand as well.

It was a sort of mental “spring-cleaning”, if you will. I wasn’t throwing away everything I had believed up to that point, but rather I was refurbishing my beliefs. I challenged myself both in class and in simple conversations with my friends. If someone voiced a political cliché or philosophical f o r t u n e c o o k i e , I urged them to explore it. I b e g a n r e a l i z i n g t h a t m o s t events on the p o l i t i c a l spectrum are

ZAC GATES

UC Santa Barbara


I saw the university as a mere platform to provoke those who disagreed with me politically.

Old Ideas, New Perspectives


not as complicated as most of our right-wing brethren believe them to be. And yet, I still dawdled at a crossroads. I had neglected my ignorance for so long that I was no longer having any impact on my colleagues. How could I change their minds, and more importantly my own? I kept learning, I kept listening and I kept asking “why.”

With my newly constructed thought process, politics became much more rewarding. Intellectual maturity helped me better understand the world around me. I made it a personal endeavor to study both sides of every issue, and it gave me a sense of confidence that drove my passion to promote the concept of liberty. I learned that I must respect my beliefs before I advance them.

As Vice President of the UCSB College Republicans, I am attempting to use my new philosophy to encourage other members to explore their own ideologies as well. The Founding Fathers were unshakable advocates of liberty because they fully understood the perils of tyranny. I believe it is important for all of us to understand why we oppose or disagree with certain arguments before we promote others. This intellectual discipline can do nothing but help us in the long run—it keeps ideas fresh instead of prolonging the monotony of unchallenged perspectives.

Liberty is my passion and it is something that I value not as a hobby, but a way of life. From my own observations, it seems the huddled masses in this country take it for granted. If this trend continues, there is no reason why tyranny will not triumph, because if liberty is not respected, then it will not be preserved. As Edmund Burke once said, “the only way for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.” We cannot be good and true in our philosophy until we appreciate what is at stake. For this reason, I believe the best way to respect liberty is to understand liberty. If we learn, value, and honor this beautiful concept, our nation will see bright days in its future.

I am so thankful for the privilege of attending UCSB for four years because academic introspection allowed me to realize that I was heading down the wrong path. It allowed me to acquire a sense of humility. But more importantly, I gained an aura of awareness. This new perspective has enlightened me on my journey through politics, and I want to share those rewards with as many people as possible.

If we want our nation to progress, we must never stop learning.

Flashpoint: Public Employee Unions v. Taxpayers

If 2010 was the rise of the Tea Party movement, then 2011 is most certainly shaping up to be the year of the showdown. This showdown is not exclusive to just Republicans and Democrats on the Hill, but is expanding to become a much larger pitched battle between public employee unions that strongly support the Democratic Party and Republican governors and mayors across the country.

The cause of such uproar is the result of Republicans being supported by a private sector workforce and a business community that want to see government live within its means. Republicans also receive strong support from the Tea Party and those who are tired of runaway spending, backed by tax increases to pay for it. It’s a clash for the future of America and after the election we are now seeing the battle raging in our capitols and city halls.

On the Hill, Speaker Boehner and the Republicans in the House are doing their best to cut spending against opposition from Democrats in Congress and the President-‐ a promise Republicans made and are remaining committed to. With leaders such as Paul Ryan, who has been leading the budget cutting efforts, Americans are being shown that our party means business.

In New Jersey, Governor Chris Christie’s crusade to reign in the outrageous public employee unions is gaining traction in the news and within the Conservative movement; with much thanks to Ann Coulter who is leading the charge. Christie’s message resonates with people who feel like our country is falling by the wayside from within. It’s not only about reforming the way

government operates, but it is also about having a future for generations to come and the wellbeing of our country.

One of the more unbelievable battles is occurring in Wisconsin, where Democrats in the Senate Qled to prevent a vote on curtailing collective bargaining rights of government unions. Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker is standing up against public employees

protesting at the state capitol, saying that the GOP “will not be intimidated.” Liberal fanatics like Rachel Maddow and Ed Shultz from MSNBC have come out attacking the Governor with usual left wing talking points claiming there is no budget deQicit and that he is giving a tax break to the rich. They have even gone so far as to ignore journalistic objectivity by neglecting coverage of the use of Hitler and Mussolini by protestors to describe the Governor all while attacking the tea partiers for being “dangerous” and “racist”.

By Clinton SofferUCSD

It’s not only about reforming the way government operates, but it is also about having a future for generations to come and the wellbeing of our country.

As we see the movements beginning to take place in states such as New Jersey, Wisconsin and Ohio, we are left to think “what about California?” Unfortunately such momentum will most deQinitely lose weight at the Rockies as public employee unions have free reign to do whatever they want in this state. Why? Because public employee unions have automatic campaign funds collected by dues funded by taxpayers. This means that in 2014, Governor Jerry Brown doesn’t have to spend a dime of his own campaign money and unless another Meg Whitman, Steve Poizner, or other wealthy Californian decides to run, public employee unions will continue to outspend Republican candidates.

One of the most important steps in turning our state around and checking the unfettered power of public employee unions is passing paycheck protection. Paycheck protection allows public employees the option of paying union dues, which today is considered mandatory by law. Simply, if you don’t support the agenda of the union, you can protect your hard earned money from being used to promote their political special interests. Paycheck protection would help Republicans be competitive with Democrats in campaign spending, which is currently very lopsided and unfair. But it’s not that easy!

Since the Governor and the Legislature are under the direction of the public employee unions, lawmakers are discouraged to pass legislation curtailing such union power. SEIU has even gone so far as to threaten running primary challengers against any Democrat who votes against their wishes. Paycheck protection will have to be an initiative created and passed by California voters.

In 2005 during Governor Schwarzenegger’s special election, paycheck protection was placed on the ballot as Proposition 75. Public employee unions spent $54.6 million to defeat the proposition compared to just $5.4 million by Yes on 75 supporters. Californians rejected it with 54% of the vote. This tells us that it won’t be easy to pass paycheck protection and that we must pick the right time to put it on the ballot. But if we can, we can change the political landscape of this state and begin the process of turning this state around it will have to start with paycheck protection.

We are seeing the clash of ideas coming full circle, as liberals and conservatives Qight to determine how the 21st century for America will look; Government as the instrument of America or as the defender? We choose as our defender.

One of the most important steps in turning our state around and checking the unfettered power of public employee unions is passing paycheck protection.

CR’S IN ACTION

Governor Brown’s Tax Hikes Avoid the Fundamental Problem in California


In a post election s u r v e y l a s t November, The Los A n g e l e s T i m e s found that seventy p e r c e n t o f Californians who participated in the election believe that the state’s

$25 billion budget hole can be filled mostly or completely by eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse. They are probably wrong, but can hardly be blamed for believing so.

Following the untimely death of State Senator Dave Cox this past summer, a special election was held January 4th to select a replacement to serve his northeastern California district. A primary had already been held, so the only contenders left were then Assemblyman Ted Gaines (R) and local city councilmember Ken Cooley (D). The district carries an eleven point Republican registration advantage and neither candidate campaigned significantly, so Gaines was the all but certain victor. The race attracted virtually no media attention. Predicting a low turnout, county elections officials asked state legislators to carry a bill allowing them to conduct a much cheaper vote by mail contest. Legislators of both parties refused. So instead, Placer County alone spent $650,000 that could have gone to other services to open the polls so that just over four percent of registered voters could cast a ballot at the voting booth on Election Day. Since Gaines achieved the expected

victory, his vacated assembly seat will now require two more special elections in March and May which will cost $800,000 each just in Placer County.

Down the road in Sacramento, KCRA television reported that the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) is spending $60,000 per year for a crossing guard to help employees cross the street between two buildings owned by the state. This would be waste enough on its face – adults generally shouldn’t require crossing guards, especially in tough budget times – but the buildings are also connected by a tunnel that most workers use instead. The DMV says the tunnel is not ADA accessible for wheelchairs. No word on why those in wheelchairs are unable to use the above crosswalk without crossing guard assistance, as they do at most every other crosswalk in the state.

All of this is occurring as Gov. Jerry Brown intends to ask Republican lawmakers and California voters to raises taxes by approximately $60 billion over five years and slash state spending. During his

ANDY NEVIS

UC Berkeley


inaugural address, Brown stated, “When dealing with a budget gap in the tens of billions, I must point out that it is far more than waste and inefficiency that we have to take out.” He is almost certainly correct. There is waste and abuse in state government, but probably not $25 billion worth. However, in politics perception is reality. As long as stories such as this remain abundant, his hopes of passing a tax increase are slim to none. In order to win the trust of the people of California and have any chance for GOP support, he must show he is serious about cutting where money should not be spent even with a surplus. So far his budget, while featuring some meaningful cuts, hasn’t fully addressed this problem.

He must not stop there, however. As President Obama’s former Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel said, “You don’t ever want a crisis to go to waste.” California must use this situation to permanently right our fiscal ship and guarantee that drastic cutbacks or tax increases will not be needed in future downturns. The state must do something to address the public employee pension crisis that will (not might) bankrupt the state if nothing is done. We must make sure that every dollar spent on education benefits students, not administrators, teachers, or bureaucrats. We must do something about the fact that California has 12% of the population but 32% of the welfare recipients nationwide. And above all else, we must make sure that state government never again spends more than the revenue it takes in.

If Governor Brown addresses these issues, he may find Republicans pragmatists both inside and outside of the legislature that will be willing to consider short-term tax hikes (not five years, try one or two) to get us out of this downturn and preserve services that truly are necessary. So far he has declined to do so, i n s t e a d o f f e r i n g gimmicks such as r e q u i r i n g s t a t e workers to turn in cell phones and cars that don’t address t h e r o o t o f t h e problem. The ball’s in your court, Governor.

QUICK FACTS

ABOUT

CALIFORNIA

1 . C a l i f o r n i a i s suffering from a $19 billion deficit.

2. $22.2 Billion is spent on state employees’ salaries annually.

3. 68.1% of the state budget goes towards t h e s a l a r i e s o f e m p l o y e e s i n t h e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n department, UC, CSU, or CDCR.

4. California’s GDP is $1.8 trillion.

5. California’s GDP is most closely related to that of Italy.

6. 37.25 million people i nha b i t the Go lden State.

7. If California were a country, it would have t h e e i g h t h l a r g e s t economy in the world.

8. California is home to three of the top ten most populated cities in the U.S.

9. California attracts more than 9 million international visitors each year.

10. California ranks number six in overall tax burden in the U.S.

While assessing the current political situations that are taking place around the world, it is important to focus our attention at just what initiated the momentum and acceleration of these events. The issue being addressed is the recent political turmoil we have seen in Egypt. It is apparent that the United States has advocated the encouragement of democratic advancement. Egypt is no exception to this. While Egypt cannot yet be categorized as a democracy, it is currently in a state of transition that needs our focus. If disregarded, the cost can be consequential.

The call for democracy is in great part due to the economic situation and started with a revolt by the people of Egypt. In regards to developing and in creating stability, the revolution will essentially geared toward the goal of addressing the high unemployment rate and rising costs of living. These issues were the catalyst for the protests and demonstrations that took place in Egypt.

Democracy can be established in Egypt; however, in order for this to begin involvement must be enacted from other world powers. The United States and other democratic nations must focus resources on institutional development. As the primary advocate for democracy worldwide, the United States must help promote democracy for the Egyptians. If not, civil and social unrest will linger and possibly lead to higher consequences.

When these protests began in January, it was quite clear that Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak’s doctoral reign was about to come to a close. After e i g h t e e n d a y s o f m a s s p r o t e s t s a n d demonstrations, Mubarak finally resigned and the military took power. People celebrated Mubarak’s resignation by shouting “Egypt is Free” in the same streets that they had been asking their dictator to step down.

Now, why should this be matter of interest to us Americans? In 2 0 0 2 , t h e n U . S S e n a t o r B a r a c k O b a m a u rge d t h e Egyptians to stop oppressing their own p e o p l e a n d suppressing dissent. He insisted that they stop tolerating corruption, inequality, and mismanagement of their economy so that in turn their youth would be able to step away from growing up without education, without prospects, and furthermore, without hope. As President, he should continue to uphold his word to focus on peacefully leading the Middle East into n e w l y d e m o c r a t i c r e g i m e s . T h e O b a m a Administration should engage in the advancement of democracy in Egypt. By doing so, they will potentially instill trust in democracy abroad. A successful transition to democracy in Egypt needs immediate attention. A neglection of the rising forces in Egypt could result in subsequent uprisings of nearby countries. It is evident that the Egyptians are extremely determined in alternating the current establishment and creating a new future. The role that America now needs to play will determine the final outcome of this current situation.

America ’s Presence in Egypt ’s Transition Towards Democracy

BIANKA ASIK

UC Irvine



C H A P T E R E V O L U T I O N

Four years ago what were you doing with College Republicans? Oh you were not a College Republican? That’s unfortunate; it is too bad you could not be a lifelong College Republican. Then again, being a College Republican is temporary. This is

something we cannot forget, so we must take advantage of this opportunity. The obvious benefits of being a CR is the networking, the good times, and work possibilities. However, I

want to talk about something that is just as important but not discussed enough.

Chapter succession is a healthy and inevitable process that

every club experiences. The imperative factor is to do this properly. There are some vital steps that must be taken in training new leadership.

In most chapters, it is not the current leaderships’ role to hand

select the next organizers of the chapter. I encourage every CR to be involved as much as possible and ask how they can be involved. If there is a vacancy, do not be afraid to fill the

position. We must always be trying to do more as CRs, which is what separates us from other the college students.

It is the current leaderships’ role to constantly share

information on how they accomplish things. Attaining guest speakers, organizing meetings, or arranging socials are a lot easier when you know how to work with your school to make it successful. Also, it must be stressed the recruitment must never

take a break, because chapters always feel the effects of fluctuating members. Information that is commonly forgotten to pass down is how to communicate with the school or get in

contact with CCR. This is how many schools lost their recognition or become no longer involved with CCR.

O t h e r t r a d e s e c r e t s include how to successful be a part of activism, rallying CRs for events,

and how to fundraise. We should never assume that t h e n e w l e a d e r s h i p

u n d e r s t a n d s h o w everything works. I can personally testify I had no

idea what to do when I became the chair of the club. The new leadership should also ask about anything they need help with, either with the former leadership or with the state board.

Finally it is also important to recognize the level the CRs are at

that will be taking over the chapter. It is just as vital to have a support group of beginners and veterans, as it is to have core active members. Every club should be aggressively recruiting

freshman and making them part of the team as part of the support group. Also, just because they are a freshman does not mean they are not qualified for major responsibilities. Some

freshman will be rockstars and capable of playing a major role. The key is to provide opportunity for everyone, which will enable natural succession.

Four years from now, when you are no longer the CR you once

used to be, you should not regret anything about your chapter. It should be as active and prosperous as the day you left it. It is sad to see many clubs that once were so famous, now struggling

or non-existent. We can change this, so everyone remember to provide the necessary tools for your chapter to continue.

NITHIN MATHEW

SJSU

The Natural Progression of the CR Chapter


CHAPTER UPDATEBeing the largest active political organization on the UC Berkeley c am p u s , B e rk e l ey Co l l ege Republicans has always stood to

strengthen our Conservative student following by promoting the core values of the Republican

party, such as a small, limited government; low tax rates from a

broad tax base; fiscal responsibility from both the federal and

state levels; and supporting our armed forces at home and abroad. Last semester, BCR made great strides to strengthen our Conservative coalition on campus by boosting club membership, working on numerous local and statewide

campaigns, and hosting a variety of events on campus to spread our Republican values.

Without a doubt, Berkeley College Republicans has held its

reputation as the largest political organization on campus for many years now -- but that doesn’t mean we can’t always get bigger. By the end of the last academic year, BCR had roughly

200 members on its roster, with about 15 to 20 members regularly attending meetings. This year we’ve grown to over 270 members on our roster, with 40 to 50 students attending weekly meetings regularly. Why is this important? Growing

stronger as an organization is not just about filling a room once a week to talk politics; our increase in numbers has allowed us to be involved in a variety of campaigns, turnout volunteers

when needed, and actually put planned events into motion through our strong and dedicated members. By tabling 5 days a week in Sproul Plaza, we have increased our visibility and

brought in new, very energetic members by the dozens.

Regardless of some of the results at the polls, some of our greatest achievements last semester involved the many campaigns of the November 2010 election. Romik Barseghian worked at least 20 hours a week on the Abram Wilson for

Assembly campaign; Andy Nevis effectively became deputy campaign manager for a Sacramento City Council campaign; and Anne Morse was the campus contact for the Balanced

Budget Amendment campaign. In addition to these few names were dozens of BCR’s who volunteered several hours at the Meg office in Oakland to phone bank, or to assist in the David

Harmer recount. For the third and final debate between Meg and Jerry in San Rafael in October, nearly 40 BCR’s carpooled across the bay to rally for Meg. After the debate, Meg spoke with the College Republicans to thank us, and our group photo

ended up being used multiple times in her online ads. BCR was well recognized and talked about across the state in the 2010 elections.

But all of these experiences and achievements would mean little if they just amounted to another line on a resume. The hard work of every Berkeley College Republican last semester has

not only given members powerful knowledge and tools from experience, but it has also boosted the reputation and brand of BCR on campus and throughout the statewide College Republican community. Put simply, BCR is back on the map

and bigger than ever before, and we plan to continue this trend by organizing great social events, such as celebrating President Reagan’s 100th birthday; planning powerful community service

events, such as Operation Military Kids; and finally by providing political and professional experience to our members through local, state, and presidential campaigns moving

forward.

SHAWN LEWIS

UC Berkeley

UC Berkeley College Republicans


As it turned out, college proved an ideal place for me to develop political and leadership skills. It was the stepping-stone to my Republicanism. My roommates bequeathed it to

me and I still have it. Michael Antonopoulos, one of my roommates who made an early name for himself on campus, asked if I’d be interested participating in the District 15 State Assembly campaign. The next months involved an amazing

combination of frustration, excitement, and unforeseen events which, when combined with political discourse, ensured my love affair.

After four years at Saint Mary’s College, like the rest of the graduates, I was packed and ready to drive back home to Watsonville. Though occasionally I felt cooped up at home

most days I found myself occupied; absorbed in my books and friends. Then I started helping my 11-year-old brother choose a middle school and my research raised concerns about student achievement. Governor Schwarzenegger

subsequently announced that six schools in the county were in emergency situation that could “seriously harm” students. I never knew how much our public education had

deteriorated. Because I had been away from home I’d rarely kept up with political affairs. Given my predicament, I thought I could get involved.

A few days later I found an extraordinary group of Republican Party leaders from the Santa Cruz County Republican Committee, which met at the local community

college. They were the keys to opportunity and empowerment for my cause. The committee member who had by far the greatest impact on my cause was Derrick Seaver, a consultant for Terra Eclipse. He was a couple years

older than I was but much more experienced in grassroots politics, having worked for several more campaigns.

My campaign got off to a rocky start, mostly because of the

lack money, but also because a lot of the local Democrats didn’t want a Republican on the board. The incumbent, who had defeated a stronger challenger, a former trustee, didn’t

a p p e a r t o b e threatened by my campaign. I already

knew enough about how difficult it was to push against the D e m o c r a t i c

establishment and that we couldn’t expect to win all

the t ime , but I believed we could d o s o m e t h i n g

special.

We reached out to the younger people first by using free online media outlets like Facebook and MySpace. We thought they would help us win crucial votes. We believed that the

candidate who was far ahead using online media communications was sure to win the election. In Watsonville forty-two percent of the population was under the age of

twenty-four, and I wanted to get every single eligible vote.

A few weeks later I raised a little money from family and friends in my first campaign dinner fundraiser. Several people

showed up and it received coverage in the local newspaper, mostly because people found out that I was the youngest person to run for office. One city councilman charged that I had so much support from the Republicans that I would be a

puppet of the party. From the beginning the local newspapers showed their bias, but the radio turned out to be a great ally. Charley Freedman from Happy Hour on KSCO was one

great supporter of my campaign. Thanks to Charley, I made some good friends who shared my passion for politics and learned more about the mechanics of grassroots

campaigning.

I was most worried about what came next: that is the walking house-to-house knocking on doors. I figured it was my only chance to make an impression. I had worked hard on

my talking points and had hammered them down to five minutes. It was a passionate call for a stronger leader that would present ordinary people against the incumbent’s

FRANCISCO DIAZ

SAINT MARY’S COLLEGE ALUMNI

RUNNING FOR SCHOOL BOARD TRUSTEE

It was the stepping-stone to my Republicanism.

concentration of power and interests. Thanks largely to walking the district three times we got enough support to build a competitive race.

The first big political event of the campaign was the Candidate Trustee Public Forum, sponsored by the Pajaro Valley Federation of Teachers, Classified School Employees

Union, and Cesar Chavez Club. I got a great reception from the forum. All I did was stand in front of an audience and talk. I was even getting some strong support from a few members who weren’t afraid to go against their union

supported candidate.

On election night we gathered at the county headquarters to watch the returns and I carried 38 percent of the votes. We

were nervous but hopeful. I thought about how, when the campaign began, the incumbent had a strong backing, while mine had gone from zero to something. We successfully

registered a large number of young adults and talked to almost every single constituent in my district. As my support grew stronger we picked up endorsements from local organizations.

At midnight, the final vote was about 46 to 52 percent. Although we had worked hard, we just couldn’t overcome

the incumbent. I was proud of our campaign, but couldn’t help think maybe I let my supporters down or my team who worked so hard for me. Maybe if I’d had more money it

would have made a difference-probably not. Still, I thought I might win. Nevertheless, I had hundreds of encounters, met voters that appreciated my message, and those of the opposition learned not to underestimate the tenacity of a

College Republican.

The opposition lear ned not to underestimate the tenacity of a College Republican.


T h i s p a s t No ve m b e r, California Republicans e x p e r i e n c e d disappointment losing every single statewide seat. College Republicans all across the state of California, put blood, sweat, and tears into the c a m p a i g n s o f t h e i r favorite candidates. We

formed student coalitions, spent Friday nights at phone banks, walked thousands of houses, rallied, and drove almost anywhere to cheer on our candidates. Not to mention eating grotesque amounts of pizza, tiring out our superstar volunteers, and spending too much time with the same people. All the sacrifices we made seem to have be in vain and make us feel like our state is hopeless.

I’ve seen my fair share of discouraged Republicans. Like my dad says when he threatens to move the family to Georgia, “California is going to break off and fall into the ocean.” Well guess what? I do not want to move to Georgia…no offense Georgia.

We can win in California but it is not going to come easy by any means. One of the most crucial things that we need to do as Republicans, especially College Republicans, is to reach out to the “unknown”. Our unknown entails minorities, particularly Latinos and young people. By doing this, Republicans need not change their values or beliefs. However, I do believe that we need to break out of our comfort zone and become active in communities we wouldn’t normally get involved in.

We have to show that we care about others than the “privileged people” the liberal media makes us out to care for and be. The hardest part is to show that we care all the time, not just when we need someone’s vote.

If Democrats know how to do anything, they know how to reach out to minorities. College Republicans have to do more community service in less fortunate areas and become involved in all communities, not just the political community. We need to seek out minorities and show them who we really are.

Ronald Reagan said it well, “Status quo, you know, is Latin for ‘the mess we’re in’.”

JOANNA DIAZ

Orange Coast College

Being Red In A Blue State


Leftist artists and entertainers, in their moral indignation and self-proclaimed righteousness, are boycotting Arizona and

the state of Israel. They are boycotting Arizona because of the modes t proposa l o f

Governor Brewer to stem the flow of illegal immigrants into her state. This new law, which was recently diminished by a court decision, would allow officers to ask civilians for their

papers only after being stopped for a legitimate lawful matter. This proposed law is actually less stringent than Federal immigration law, which allows officers to ask for documentation for no reason at all. In addition, the Arizona law explicitly

disallows race to be a factor in officers questioning of immigration status.

Regardless of these facts, what has followed is the usual

overreaction of leftists crying "racist," "xenophobe" and the rest of the epithets liberals throw around whenever they get upset at conservatives. In addition to accusing conservatives of racism,

liberal artists and entertainers are refusing to perform in Arizona. This is how liberals operate-- we disagree with you politically, therefore we will starve you economically (this reminds me of when liberals in Hollywood attempted to purge

supporters of proposition 8 from show business, even though a majority of Californians supported the initiative). Could you imagine conservative artists refusing to perform in

Massachusetts because it permits same sex marriage? So far, Kanye West, Rage Against the Machine and Sonic Youth are refusing to perform in Arizona because of SB 1070.

Where is the outrage among conservatives? Where is the outrage among Arizonans?

This brings me to the state of Israel, where the Pixies, Elvis Costello and the Gorrilaz have refused to perform to punish

the only Jewish country in the world. Elvis Costello claimed his "conscience" wouldn't allow him to perform in Israel. The moral ineptitude and stupidity of boycotting the only

true democracy in the Middle East--where Muslims are treated better than in any Muslim country--is beyond

reproach. Furthermore, these artists aren't even principled in their boycotts. I would like to ask the Pixies, Gorillaz and Elvis Costello this: Do you support America's war in Iraq (of course, they do not)? If not, then why don't you refuse to play in

America? The obvious answer is they cannot afford to boycott America or they would be out of business. So basically, they are boycotting tiny Israel--the only country in the world constantly

threatened with annihilation--because it won’t negatively affect their income. How courageous! Again I ask, where is the outrage among Jews, Israel supporters and conservatives

(unfortunately, Israel has become a partisan issue, as liberals are abandoning Israel in droves, while conservatives stay sturdy in support).

Why is it that the left has been able to hijack the narrative with

regards to Israel and Arizona? Americans overwhelmingly support both Israel (63%) and SB 1070 (55%) yet these liberal artists are able to boycott Israel and Arizona without any

significant outrage or counter-boycotts. So I propose this: encourage your children, friends, relatives, parents, etc. to refuse to support these artists. Do not buy their CDs and do not

go to their live shows. Some one like Kanye West especially--one of the most popular rappers in the world--is very popular among teenagers; thus, parents who support SB 1070 should refuse to buy their teenager tickets to see him perform live. If

these artists wish to starve Israel and Arizona economically then we should do the same back to them. Enough is enough. Conservatives must start fighting back!

SAMMY LEVINE

CSU Northridge

Counter|Protest

As College Republicans, we have to compete with the popularized liberal movement taking shape among our peers. While we have a myriad of reasons for our political views, we must work to communicate that message in our battle with the liberal media and the political commentary of celebrities that our classmates look up to. We must learn from our mistakes and avoid falling short in outreach to the youth vote because while the youth stereotype persists on college campuses, there are many students

who consider themselves liberal and do not even know why.

So, with all these obstacles in our path, how can we show our peers the error in their ways?As corny as it may sound, building a positive conservative image and membership base starts with individual and club activism. By creating a loud, positive presence on campus, College Republicans can get on and off campus publicity and gain student support.

Know your Stuff

Having an opinion or view is great. Having facts, data and other news sources to support your opinions are even better. The easiest way to discover information about a subject you care about is to ask: Why? Why do I feel this way? And, just as importantly, why do others not agree? By researching these questions on the most important political topics to you, you can uncover many details and data about the topic at hand that political opponents may not consider.

Network

Particularly for those studying Political Science, finding a political ally can be as easy as socializing in class. Do not be afraid to reach out to strangers in class, on campus, and at political events, as you never know who may want to become the next College Republican board member or may want to help you get a job one day. Never be ashamed to express yourself and reach outside of your comfort zone to networking with others.

Creating and Communicating a College Republican Presence on Campus


TARYN DICTEROW

USC


Also, as college students, we have a rare, great opportunity to get involved, not just in our College Republican club, but also with dozens of other student organizations. By attending meetings and social events for clubs, even non-political ones, you may be able to find politically interested, like-minded individuals like yourself with ease.

Create a Presence on Campus

While this may sound like a daunting task, creating a strong presence on campus can be as simple as being on campus as a College Republican consistently. However, if you do not “look” like a College Republican, do not have a College Republican shirt or banner to give you away, this will be in vain. Getting members of your chapter to show off their shirts in class, have lunch in highly student-populated areas together either with a banner as a marker, or tabling on campus every week can create a lasting impression among your peers. By showing that you are there and have support, many Republicans “in the closet” may loosen their fear and become inspired to join forces with your club.

Write!

Another way to create publicity for your club on campus and in the community is through writing in local newspapers. Pick a current event that you care about and present the issue from the College Republican perspective. This method will gain you support from both students and community members who want to contribute to the College Republicans.

Volunteer

Be proactive about volunteering for political events on and off campus. From precinct walking and phone calls, to special events, to student activism and outreach, political organizers are constantly looking for support and volunteers. Further, when willing and eager to get involved, organizers will remember your work and dedication in future projects. Volunteering will also attract students who care to get involved in politics on a more pragmatic and consistent level.

Remember, when you are voicing a conservative opinion, you are representing the conservative movement so get out there, be heard, and do it justice!


1. Know your stuff

2. Network

3. Create a presence on campus

4. Write!

5. Volunteer

DMI thanks the college republicans for their moxie on campuses throughout California

moxie - spring 2011

Documents