moving on: why flying less means more for business jean leston, transport policy, wwf-uk
TRANSCRIPT
Moving on: why flying less means more for
business
Jean Leston,
Transport Policy, WWF-UK
“The strength of London’s economy depends on its success as a world city and, for many business sectors, that means being able to fly to meet their customers, peers and suppliers. They need to fly.”
Baroness Valentine, Chief Executive, London First
But business doesn’t NEED to fly!
What you might want
vs
What you actually need
Other reasons for flying…
• Bragging rights
• Status
• Break from the office
• Escape from family duties
WWF’s Moving On research
• Discover how recession affecting business travel in FTSE 500 companies
• Understand future travel intentions, especially flying
• Provide data that can be used to fight back on ‘business needs expansion’
Key findings
• 86% of companies reducing carbon footprint from business travel
• 47% have reduced their business flights in last 2 years• 63% of companies have a policy to reduce business
flights• Much greater use of conferencing technologies• 85% do not expect to return to pre-recession levels of
flying• 92% agree it is possible to fly less and remain both
profitable and competitive
Changes to business travel (in last 2 years)
Alternatives to flying
Benefits of changing travel and meeting practices
What WWF thinks the findings mean
• Conferencing technologies now mainstream• Evidence of permanent change, BAU flying won’t
return• Domestic/short haul flights most easily replaced• Supports better not bigger airports• Government needs to:
– Roll out high speed broadband– Improve rail network– Reduce cost of rail travel vs air– Offer tax incentives to business
One in Five Challenge
• 20% cut in flying over five years• Includes leading companies: M&S, Lloyds
Bank, Balfour Beatty, BSkyB, Vodafone, Microsoft, BT
• In first year, on average members achieved– 5,500 fewer flights– £1 million in avoided costs– 1,000 tonnes CO2 savings
wwf.org.uk/movingon
wwf.org.uk/oneinfive