moscow rules cia

7/30/2019 Moscow Rules CIA

1/4

Tweet 0

Spycraft in MoscowThe wigs may seem silly, but Moscow's exposure of CIA espionage is serious

business.

By PHILIP GIRALDI May 21, 2013

FSB

It is tempting to regard the recent arrest of Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) officer Ryan

Fogle in Moscow and the subsequent outing of the station chief as symptoms of a decline

in the Agencys capability to run operations in a high-risk, high-security environment.

This was by no means the first such success for post-Soviet Russian counterintelligence

directed against the two countries, Britain and the United States, that continue to have

both the capability and motivation to spy against the Russians on their home turf. Inside

the United States, the Russians reciprocate, running spy networks generally focused on

obtaining high-tech military information useful for their own arms industry. The FBI

roll-up of a Russian spy ring featuring the alluring Anna Chapman in 2010 was widely

reported. Chapman is nowa television personality in Moscow and occasionally models.

The Russians filmed the arrest of Fogle and also obligingly provided the world media with

a photo of what he was carrying when he was detained. The photo has inspired

considerable merriment on the blogosphere because it apparently confirms everyones

worst fears that the CIA no longer knows what it is doing (if it ever did, as some would

add).

The Russian Federal Security Service (FSB) is reporting that Fogle, a third secretary at

the political section in the Moscow Embassy, twice phoned a Russian intelligence officer

who specialized in Islamic terrorism in Russias Caucasus region. Fogle, who revealed in a

Russian-language letter to his prospective agent that there had already been some quid

pro quo, clearly believed that the Russian was already committed to assisting the United

States. The letter that he carried provided instructions on setting up a secure Gmail

Subscribe to our newsletter

Help Us Grow

As a reader-funded non-profit, wecount on your support. Now you canhelp a little every month: just commit$3, $10, or whatever is comfortabletoday! Thanks to you, we will reachnew readers, challenge more minds,and give you more of the bestconservative magazine in America.

Donate

The Bystander President

PATRICK J. BUCHANAN May 21, 3:49 AM

AP, Then James RosenHow Widespread Is

DOJ Surveillance of Journalists?

JORDAN BLOOM May 20, 12:52 PM

Thats Right: Chris Christie Is a Good

Conservative Republican

SCOTT GALUPO May 20, 4:58 AM

Rod Dreher

For TEC Bish, Diabolism Is DiversityMay 21, 2:32 AM

Stan Wilson

May 21, 1:50 AM

Tornado Hits Elementary School

May 20, 5:56 PM

Daniel Larison

Rand Paul and the CFR

May 20, 10:53 AM

What Do Syria Hawks Want?

May 20, 10:05 AM

The Limits of U.S. Influence

May 20, 8:49 AM

Alan Jacobs

We Are Moving

May 21, 6:31 AM

Ross Douthat Is Wrong! (Or Not)

May 20, 10:37 PM

Noah Millman

Seriousness, Sadism and Sound Money

May 20, 4:38 PM

Is Kant An Advance Over A Sexual Ethics Of

Consent?

May 20, 3:44 PM

HOME BLOGS POLITICS WORLD CULTURE ARTS & LETTERS ARCHIVE

Spycraft inMoscow

Reagan, Hawk orDove?

Where MustAmericans Die?

BipartisanPredators

craft in Moscow | The American Conservative http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/sp

4 05/21/2013 02


2/4

account and pledging up to $1 million a year with the promise of additional bonuses for

information. Fogle was also carrying a considerable sum in cash which might have been

regarded as a recruitment bonus, de rigueur in such cases.

The Russians and the media have been making fun of Fogle over the letter, his wigs, his

Moscow street atlas, and his compass, but all are components for running intelligence

operations in what is referred to as a denied area, meaning an environment that is

controlled by a hostile security service. Fogles disguises were meant to fool live

surveillance following him on foot or in cars and to make it more difficult to track him on

CCTV, which covers central Moscow. The Russians have revealed that the Fogle wigs

matched a wig they seized while arresting CIA officer Mike Sellers in 1986not

completely surprising as the Agency has its own disguise factory.

Fogles route through Moscow would have been meticulously planned, indicating that the

atlas and compass had an operational rather than a practical purpose. The street atlas

would be used to set up secure communications in Moscow by use of dead drops, where

material could be left by one party and later picked up by another. I would imagine

dead-drop sites were somehow marked and indicated on the city street maps. The

compass likely would be used, rather than a GPS that gives off a trackable signal, because

Fogle may have been testing communicating to satellite from that part of Moscow. The

system used, referred to by a codeword that I would best not reveal, fires a microsecond

burst of encoded information but requires precise timing and compass orientat ion to

work correctly when the satellite is in the right position. The cell phone shown in the FSB

photo, large and clunky as it is, might have been modified to communicate with the

satellite. (Rest assured that I am not revealing anything that the Russians do not already

know.)

It is clear from the letter that Fogle was intending to meet his prospective agent, a man

Fogle or others would have certainly met with before, likely outside of Russia. The

potential agent would also have been vetted, possibly including a polygraph exam, to

make sure that the CIA was not being doubled. Otherwise no one in Langley would have

approved taking the considerable risk to set up the meeting in Moscow.

The approach itself might be construed as clumsy, but the letter carried by Fogle is not as

bizarre as it is being portrayed, as it would both outline and confirm the commitment to

compensate the fledgling agent with lots of money, the presumed motivation for

cooperation. The KGB used to say that one could corrupt the French and Italians with a

woman, the British with a man, and the Americans always with money. In truth, U.S.

intelligence officers have always regarded money as the key to establishing relationships

with spies and, when they themselves turned, as in the Robert Hanssen and Aldrich Ames

cases, they have done so for the cash on the line, not for ideological reasons.

Well, in this case, everyone involved from the CIA side was effectively diddled. The new

agent was clearly a double, undoubtedly a dangle produced by the FSB with the

expectation that the CIA, desperate for sources on the Caucasus in the wake of the Boston

Marathon bombing, would forget about normal security protocols and take the bait. They

did just that, falling into a trap set by the Russians and being filmed while doing so. It is

reminiscent of a scene in a Havana park in the 1980s in which a CIA officer, who will

remain nameless, was filmed while strolling down a footpath and pausing to pick up a

turd. He placed the turd in his pocket and went on his way. The turd was, of course, fake,

fabricated at the CIA Office of Technical Services to conceal a message from another

agent. As in Moscow, the agent in Cuba was a double, working for his own country while

pretending to cooperate with the Americans.

There have been numerous detentions of American officials in Moscowand of Russian

officials in Washingtonfor espionage since the fall of the Soviet Union. Frequently, the

official involved is declaredpersona non grata and leaves quietly, never to return, but

every once in a while the host country decides to send a message. The U.S. did so in 2010

with the Chapman ring arrests. In this case, the Russians, who had already more-or-less

quietly expelled U.S. official Benjamin Dillon in January, were sending the message that

aggressive CIA spying must stop. The FSB had reportedly been surveilling Fogle for

months, since he arrived in country, after noting that his outside-the-embassy behavior

did not fit the pattern of other American diplomats. The FSB was also saying something

on a more personal level, telling the Agency that it is more than capable of identifying and

exposing CIA officers operating inside Russia. Even though espionage tit-for-tat is a game

that Washington and Moscow have played since the end of the Second World War, the

outing of the station chief by the Russians is serious business, as it demands

commensurate retaliation. So the arrest and expulsion of Foyle will have real

consequences, apart from providing an amusing interlude of what might appear to be

bumbling. It is a deliberate raising of the espionage stakes on the part of the Russians

Ron Unz

American Pravda: Barrels of Gunpowder andSparks

May 17, 3:35 PM


4 05/21/2013 02


3/4

MORE FROM THIS AUTHOR

Recommended Movies

Who Voted for War With Iran, Mr.Obama?

MORE IN WORLD

PHILIP GIRALDI

Spycraft in Moscow

NOAH MILLMAN

A Brief Word About Hagel

that will negatively affect the already somewhat fractious bilateral relationship between

Moscow and Washington.

Philip Giraldi, a former CIA officer, is executive director of the Council for the National

Interest.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Name *

Email *

Website

Comment

You may use these HTML tags and attributes:

Post Comment


4 05/21/2013 02


4/4

BLOGS

State of the Union

Daniel Larison

Rod Dreher

Alan Jacobs

Noah Millman

CATEGORIES

Politics

World

Culture

Arts & Letters

The Repository

ABOUT US

Who We Are

FAQ

Comments Policy

Jobs/Internships

Masthead

Contact TAC

THE MAGAZINE

Subscribe

Change Address

Customer Service

Donate

Advertise


4 05/21/2013 02

moscow rules cia

Documents