more meat, milk, and fish by and for the poor: cgiar research program 3.7
DESCRIPTION
Presented by Tom Randolph to the 2nd Multi-stakeholder Platform Meeting Agenda for Action for Sustainable Livestock Sector Development, Phuket, Thailand, 2 December 2011TRANSCRIPT
More meat, milk, and fishby and for the poor
Presented to the 2nd Multi-stakeholder Platform MeetingAgenda for Action for Sustainable Livestock Sector Development
Phuket2 December 2011
CGIAR Research Program 3.7
CGIAR Change process
Perceived lack of impact
Lack of focus, inefficiencies
Lack of funding stability
New! CGIAR Consortium & Fund Council
CGIAR Research Programs
Transition ongoing
Outline of Presentation
CGIAR Change process
Purpose of consultation
CRP3.7 Concept
Operationalizing CRP3.7
CRP3.7 on Livestock & Fish
April-May 2010: Concept note
June-Sept 2010:
Proposal development
Stakeholder consultation
Feb-May 2011: Comments and revisions
July 2011: Fund Council approves with
‘light adjustments’
Official start: January 2012
Purpose for this consultation
Stakeholders shaped CRP3.7 proposal FARA meeting in July 2010
Stakeholder meeting in August 2010
E-consultation June 2010-June 2011
Continue spirit of consultation now CRP3.7 has been approved
How are we planning to implement CRP3.7?
How are we addressing environmental concerns
Goal
More meat, milk and fish by and for the poor
To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
Goal
More meat, milk and fish … for the poor
To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
Goal
More meat, milk and fish by … the poor
To sustainably increase the productivity of small-scale livestock and fish systems to increase the availability and affordability of animal-source-foods for poor consumers and, in doing so, reduce poverty through greater participation by the poor along the whole value chains for animal-source foods.
Consumers
Past research has focused specific aspectsof given value chains, commodities and country.
Consumers
...in Country A
Consumers
Consumers
...in Country D
...in Country C
...in Country B
Basic Idea: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Traditional approach was piecemeal
Consumers
R4D integrated to transform selected value chains In targeted commodities and countries.
Value chain development team + research partners
We propose a focus on integrated value-chains for bigger impact . . .
Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Strategic CRP 3.7 Cross-cutting Platforms• Technology Generation• Market Innovation• Targeting & Impact
Consumers
R4D integrated to transform selected value chains In targeted commodities and countries.
Value chain development team + research partners
GLOBAL RESEARCH PUBLIC GOODS
INTERVENTIONS TO SCALE OUT REGIONALLY
. . . combined with strategic cross-cutting platforms for scaling out.
Major intervention with development partners
Approach: Solution-driven R4D to achieve impact
Getting to impact
Serving as Knowledge Partner in development interventions
Goal: catalyze large-scale intervention to transform target value chain
Smart design
Generate convincing evidence
Attract investment
1 Technology development:
− Genetics− Feeds− Health
Consumers
Commodity X in Country Y
2 Value chain development
3 Targeting: Foresight, prioritization, gender, impact assessment
Cross-cutting: M&E, communications, capacity building
Delivering CRP3.7 Livestock + Fish
Structure: Three integrated Components
9 Target Value Chains
PIGS
AQUACULTURE
SHEEP & GOATS
DAIRY
3-year Budget Envelope by Center
TOTAL = US$99.6 million
3-year Budget Envelope by Component
TOTAL = US$99.6 million
Initial Work Plan: Technology Development
Animal health, genetics, feeds: Assess constraints from pro-poor value chain lens Identify best-bet interventions
Animal health Continued work on key diseases: ECF, CBPP,
PPR, African Swine fever Livestock and fish genetics
Community-breeding schemes, fish improvement programs
Feeds Improved food-feed crops, forages
Initial Work Plan: Value chain development
Frameworks, tools for VC assessment Link to CRP2 led by IFPRI
Partner engagement – R&D alliances Site selection process Rapid and in-depth VC assessment Situational analysis Testing & generating evidence for best-bet
interventions Action-research to get to solutions Conventional trials to ensure credible
evidence
Initial Work Plan:Targeting, gender, M&E
Targeting GIS and trend analysis of target value chains
regionally and nationally
Gender & equity Tools and reviews Priority interventions
M&E and impact assessment Frameworks and indicators
Environmental concerns
Growing value chains will have environmental implications Expanded carbon footprint, more GHG Stress on eco-services, degradation Social: over-consumption of animal-
source foods?
Good: improved productivity reduces GHG/unit product
Actions to addressenvironmental concerns
Articulate Environment strategy(as addendum to proposal)
NEW! Environmental impact assessment
1 Technology development:
− Genetics− Feeds− Health
Consumers
Commodity X in Country Y
2 Value chain development
3 Targeting: Foresight & prioritization, gender, impact assessment
Cross-cutting: M&E, communications, capacity building
Environment Component added
Structure: Three integrated Components
Actions to addressenvironmental concerns
Articulate Environment strategy
Add Environment Component to structure
Trade-off analysis for water, land and biomass use
Appropriately adapted Life Cycle Analysis for value chain (ex. WF study)
Environmental monitoring plan
Evaluate implications of proposed technologies and value chain interventions
Relevance for the Agenda of Action
Closing the efficiency gap
improving productivity in small-scale systems
Grasslands ??
Reduced discharge – manure management
easier to manage in small-scale systems as integrated crop-livestock production or with manure as a marketable by-product
CRP 4
Discussion Points1. Does our approach on environmental
issues adequately address your thematic areas?
2. Are we missing other key environmental concerns?
3. What lessons can you offer on how research can better work with development partners to stimulate pro-poor value chain development?
4. Obviously the private sector is key to sustainability of our target value chains. What have we learned about research successfully engaging the private sector? Examples?
More meat, milk and fishby and for the poor
We wish to thank FAO for allowing this opportunity to consult with our core
stakeholders